NOChurch

A lot of water under the bridge, but only variations on the same narratives

It has been a long time since I last wrote - close to 9 months. A lot has happened since then, but truly, it has been all variations on the same themes, both in the secular and the ecclesiastical worlds. The details may have changed but the narratives have remained practically identical since my last entry.

In the Church, Bergoglio has continued cracking down on anything resembling Catholicism, what with Traditionis Custodes in July and a response to his own dubia to the same document which made things even worse. Doubless I shall write more about that. On top of that the usual diet of heresy and insults. In other words, just another year in the Bergoglian papacy.

In the secular world, reopenings and emergence of 'new variants' whenever things seem to be calming down. The only true change from last May when I wrote last is that we now have forced injections introduced by Western governments, with others in non-Western countries following suit. The big disappointment has been Russia, where Vladimir Putin has been a massive disappointment.

Now we have talk of war in Ukraine - which I insist is yet another media hoax - and stories of even worse diseases coming from China - with no evidence presented of their existence. It does seem as though many in the bash China crowd really want to turn the clock back to 2019 and start the whole Covid-19 hoax all over again. I cannot understand why else they are pushing the story about hemorragic fever in China with not even the accompanying fake footage that we had in 2019 at the outset of the Covid-19 scamdemic.

As I have been mainly pre-occupied with keeping track of the Covid-19 lies, I have had little time for ecclesiastical details, and little time for much else. That must change as it seems as though the Covid-19 narratives are also shifting, and Bergoglio has intensified his attacks on the Faith.

There are large protests in Canada, and truck convoys have also sprung up in Europe, Australia, the U.S. and possibly even other places we have not heard about. 

There are rumours that Bergoglio will issue even more restrictions on the practice of authentic Catholicism by banning the Mass on certain Sundays - 1st Sundays - and Feast days, presumably. We do not have any details on these as far as I have been able to ascertain, but if we keep in mind a simple rule with Bergoglio, we shall not be shocked, and the rule is "the worse the rumours are with Bergoglio the more likely they are to be true".

In brief, there will be much to write about in the coming weeks and months, and I vow to make an effort to stay on top of things and offer commentary.

Meanwhile, I continue to insist that every Catholic has a duty to join in on anti-Covid-19 protests. We can also join in on anti-Bergoglio protests by attending the True Roman Rite Mass and avoiding the Novus Ordo pseudo-Mass. 

If we start there, then at least we are on the right side of things.

Every Catholic has a duty to join in on the Covid-19 protests

As anybody reading this will know, we are coming close to the 2-year anniversary of the supposedly first case of the supposed Covid-19 disease, which they allege is caused by the alleged SARS-CoV2 virus. That was indeed a rather strenuous sentence to read, but it expressed the sort of skepticism which has been all-too lacking in this whole distasteful episode.

Many of those who have not believed the lies wholesale have taken to the streets to protest, to the mockery of Bergoglio and the Covid-19 agents. Sadly the Catholic Church has a whole has not spoken out against the Covid-19 agenda, and on the whole, the NOChurch hierarchy has been a driver of this agenda and not an opponent.

Even the usually-reliable SSPX has not taken a unified stand against it, and some of the more official documents have been disappointing to say the least. While I can understand that the SSPX is not in as strong a position to oppose it as the Holy See, it is nonetheless disappointing that some of the messaging has been approving of the medical concoction which has been labelled a Covid-19 vaccine. They could at least have stayed silent if they didn't dare to join in the protests publicly. I certainly do not want to believe that some of the higher-ups in the SSPX could be so stupid as to believe there is an actual medical pandemic afoot.

I for one have joined in on many of these protests as we have indeed had quite a few in Sweden. Generally I do not believe in protests, at least not in peaceful ones, because I remain unconvinced that peaceful protests actually achieve anything. The only protests which work tend to be those which are either funded or taken over by other political forces aiming to take the reins in the country, Certainly, I am unaware of any large peaceful protest movement which has ever changed the policy direction of a country.

The Covid-19 protests are different, however. It is fanciful to think that politicians will change their mind on account of a small proportion of a small minority of people who still think for themselves, when these are protesting peacefully and when history has shown that politicians cannot even be moved by large peaceful protests.

Rather, the object of the protests must be seen first and foremost as those individuals who have misgivings about the Covid-19 agenda but think they are alone in doing so. It seems indeed as though the propaganda has had as one of its primary aims to convince people that everyone else has bought into the hoax, that if you do not buy into it then you are all alone, that resistance, even dissent, is futile. It is for the awakening of these people that I mainly go out into the streets to protest. Plus, I can have little excuse for not protesting in Sweden given the punishments I face here are puny compared to those protesting in places far more authoritarian - say Australia or Canada, or even Germany.

There is, however, another very important reason to go out, and that is because I as a Catholic must atone for the Church's - more specifically NOChurch's - role in this mass deception. The most unsavoury incident in this whole Covid-19 show was Bergoglio closing down the churches in Italy, even before the state had forced him to, while cafés and all maner of other places were still open. It would have been atrocious for Bergoglio to concede even had the state attempted to force him, but he did it without even that. In truth, it must be admitted that Bergoglio probably wanted to close down churches for a long time since eliminating the Catholic Faith seems to be the one thing that drives him on to all his other wicked deeds, but given that he did it while the Covid-19 rmedia oad show was hitting Italy, it allowed the world's press to write all manner of horror headlines. We all remember the many "this is the first time in X-hundred years that so-and-so has been cancelled" and these headlines could not have happened without Beroglio.

It is, I would argue, these headlines which helped propel Covid-19 into a mass psychosis.

I remain convinced, and have been so from almost the very beginning, that Bergoglio is the key figure in this whole hoax. We need Bergoglio taken out, and I don't mean to dinner. If we got a Catholic pope to replace Bergoglio, the Covid-19 hoax would end within a week, and then the NWO-agents would have to find another excuse to imprison mankind.

Of course, Bergoglio is not alone in this. I have also long held the belief - from the very beginning actually, back when I thought Covid-19 was real - that this agenda will only end when one of the national rulers loses his/her head, when heads roll, and I do mean that literally. At this rate, this will only end with the shedding of blood, and I don't even think it would take many revolutions for that to happen. If crowds break into the presidential palace of a major, or even minor, European country, or even South American country, and impale the president's head on the gates of the palace, that would send a strong enough message and the rest would fall in line pretty quickly.

The problem right now is that the rulers of countries fear the global elites more than they fear their own citizenry. When that changes, the Covid-19 agenda ends. It's that simple. However, they won't fear their citizenry until and unless they have an example to point to. Right now, they probably point to John Pombe Magufuli - the president of Tanzania who died under extremely suspicious circumstances - and think to themselves that they don't want to be Magufulid next. Well, that could change with just one popular revolution. Much like with the fall of communism in Eastern Europe, the...

NOChurch lives up to its moniker and becomes "no church"

For quite a while now I have referred to the Church of Vatican II as NOChurch. This is obviously a moniker derived from my usual reference of it as "Novus Ordo church", as opposed to the real Catholic Church which is obscured by this pseudo-church of Vatican II.

Little did I know that NOChurch was actually going to give up even the pretence of Catholicism and forbid Mass attendance, and even celebration, altogether. The occasion of this prohibition was the now-pervasive Covid-19 Chinese coronavirus, which has spread like wildfire in Italy and has by now shut down much of the country. The frightening thing about it, however, is that NOChurch shut down Masses in Italy even before the government required it. Even confession has been cancelled in many places.

Presumably they wanted to show that they cared more than anybody else, but at least part of it probably has to do with the fact that they don't see the Mass as something all that important. To many of the hierarchy in the Vatican it's just a pasttime, something pious or pious-seeming people get up to on Sundays, as opposed to hiking or canoeing. That might explain also why they don't see it as such a big thing inviting non-Catholics and public heretics to the 'banquet', as they call it, because if it's just a gathering then there is no reason why protestants or other non-Catholics (heretics included) should be denined the chance of a communal gathering hightlighted by a communal stroll to the front of the church.

What is has allowed everyone to do is conclude this very thing. One need not even be a traditionalist to see that the NOChurch hierarchy doesn't believe much in the 'mumbo jumbo' as they would probably call it.

Let us recall that - if my information is accurate - they cancelled Mass while there was still no general prohibition against frequenting public spaces! My understanding is that restaurants and pubs were still open, as was public transportation. I would assume that these have now been shut down but at the time that NOChurch decreed this they were still available. In other words, if they actually believed that the Chinese coronavirus was dangerous, it was apparently not dangerous enough to keep one from work, but dangerous enough to keep us from the Mass.

Worse was to follow still as Bergoglio then ordered all churches in Rome closed. This seems to have backfired and he seemed to pin the blame on his vicar-general, but we can assume that Bergoglio was definitely in on it if not the chief instigator of the decision. It would seem typical of the man to shun responsibility when put to task.

Outside Italy things were not much better as even though churches were not closed everywhere, many bishops took the opportunity to ram hand Communion down our throats, or hands, as the case may be, proving yet again that these people never waste a chance to desacralise. This was certainly the case in Germany, and before that the Diocese of Hong Kong and Singapore had done the very same thing. In fact, Sweden is one of few places where the Church has had a measured response, and for that the bishop and his vicar-general and the Church hierarchy in general is to be commended. The Church in Poland also deserves praise for not losing sight of priorities.

It is certainly easy to understand why the Church would want her flock  to be physically safe, but given that we must put God first and that our souls are eternal, it seems very telling that the hierarchy chose to prioritise the physical well-being of the few who frequent Mass over their spiritual well-being, by denying them the very tools they need to reach eternity at the very time of the year when the Sacraments and sacramentals are likely to bear most fruit - the Lenten season. We must conclude that we are dealing with a largely unbelieving hiearchy. It has been reported that in times past the Church urged the faithful to participate in public processions and acts of atonement at times of plagues and epidemics, and yet today we are left with a hierarchy which in places has attempted to deprive us of even personal use of our sacred spaces. Others have remarked that Bergoglio and his henchmen, in shutting down the celebration of the Mass, managed to achieve what emperors and communists never managed to do.

Another consideration is worth pondering: If the faithful can go without Mass for a month, and manage to occupy themselves with other pursuits, what is to bring them back to Church after that month? I mean, we have already established that the Church and God definitely take a backseat at the very least to the professional life. Perhaps resting out on Sundays so as to be fit and ready for Monday work is a better pursuit of one's time then.

In any case, God does bring good out of evil, and in the response to the Chinese coronavirus scare, He has afforded a good opportunity to those resistant to facing reality to see just how far from Catholicism NOChurch has fallen.

NOChurch at this moment in time literally entails "no church" and that is not even an exaggeration. It matters not that the abscence of Novus Ordo masses probably ought to be cause for celebration. I might disdain the Novus Ordo Mass, but the hierarchy insist it is a valid, licit and dignified Mass. I am willing to grant that it is valid but definitely not licit or dignified, and their treatment of it and the Sacraments in general says much more than their protestations to the contrary.

 

 

Pages

Subscribe to NOChurch