
In the name of tolerance, tolerance is being abolished; this is a real threat we face.
The House Judiciary Committee voted 13-10 Tuesday to advance legislation that would repeal the controversial Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act, a law which has been disproportionately weaponized to jail peaceful pro-life activists.
Rep. Chip Roy, R-TX, who introduced HR 589 in January, urged the committee to put an end to what he called politically motivated prosecutions ahead of Tuesday’s vote.
“The politicized nature of these prosecutions cannot be ignored,” Roy said. “HR 589 eliminates the possibility that everyday Americans can face felony convictions for peaceful acts such as sidewalk counseling or signing hymns. Passage of this bill is a crucial and necessary step.”
“Having a statute such as this in place is begging for it to be politicized,” Roy continued. “It was politicized, and Americans have been put in prison as a result of their beliefs. And it should not remain in place.”
REACH PRO-LIFE PEOPLE WORLDWIDE! Advertise with LifeNews to reach hundreds of thousands of pro-life readers every week. Contact us today.
Originally enacted in 1994, the FACE Act criminalizes interference with access to abortion clinics. But as CatholicVote previously reported, 97% of FACE Act prosecutions have targeted pro-life individuals — many for nonviolent protests, including prayer outside abortion facilities.
CatholicVote Director of Government Affairs Tom McClusky praised the committee’s action Tuesday.
“When the FACE Act was first passed in the ‘90s, both Democratic and Republican administrations avoided using it, questioning its constitutionality,” McClusky said. “It wasn’t until Barack Obama started using it to attack pro-lifers, and then Joe Biden’s Justice Department ultra-weaponized it, that a growing consensus realized that the FACE Act needed to go, as well over 90% of its targets were peaceful pro-lifers.”
“Rep. Chip Roy has been the champion of repeal — and it is past time the whole House votes to rid ourselves of this ugly weapon,” he concluded.
In January, President Donald Trump pardoned nearly two dozen pro-lifers unjustly prosecuted under the FACT Act by the Biden administration Department of Justice (DOJ). Some individuals faced several years in prison for peaceful protesting and sidewalk counseling.
Ahead of Tuesday’s vote, a coalition of major pro-life groups — including CatholicVote — sent a letter to the Judiciary Committee voicing strong support for repeal.
“Repealing the FACE Act in its entirety is an excellent step in ensuring that never again will pro-life activists have the FBI knock on their front door simply for standing up for the most vulnerable in society,” the letter stated.
The bill now heads to the House floor for a full vote.
LifeNews Note: Elise DeGeeter writes for CatholicVote, where this column originally appeared.
The post House Panel Approves Bill to Stop Putting Pro-Life Americans in Prison appeared first on LifeNews.com.
In what is reportedly the first real test of the tariff terror pass-through impact on the average American, today's CPI print was expected to rise modestly following survey after survey suggesting the fecal matter is about to strike the rotating object... just like every mainstream media economist warned.
ISM Manufacturing prices expanded to 69.8, the highest since June 2022.
ISM Services ticked up to 65.1 in April, the highest since January 2023.
S&P Global US Manufacturing firms increased their output prices by the greatest degree since early 2023.
S&P Global US Services prices advanced.
Richmond Fed manufacturing showed prices received rose to 2.65 from 2.34 in March.
New York Fed manufacturing prices received edged up to 28.7 from 22.4 in March.
Philadelphia Fed manufacturing report showed prices received gained to 30.7 compared to 29.8 in March.
Kansas City Fed manufacturing prices received surged to 29, up from 15 in March.
Kansas City Fed non-manufacturing showed selling prices rose in April.
Dallas Fed manufacturing outlook report showed prices received for finished goods advanced to 14.9, up from 6.3 in March.
Dallas Fed services selling prices rose to 8.4 from 5.2 in the prior month.
Chicago PMI showed prices expanded at a faster pace in April.
So what did we get?
A nothingburger... again... as headline and core CPI both printed below expectations.
Headline CPI rose just 0.1% MoM in May (+0.2% MoM exp), inching higher to +2.4% YoY (from +2.3% YoY in April)...
Source: Bloomberg
Energy deflation dominated the headline CPI...
Source: Bloomberg
CPI increased 0.1% MoM after rising 0.2 percent in April; Over the last 12 months, the all items index increased 2.4 percent before seasonal adjustment. The index for all items less food and energy rose 0.1% in May, following a 0.2% increase in April.
The index for shelter rose 0.3% in May and was the primary factor in the all items monthly increase. The food index increased 0.3% as both of its major components, the index for food at home and the index for food away from home also rose 0.3% in May.
In contrast, the energy index declined 1.0% in May as the gasoline index fell over the month.
Indexes that increased over the month include medical care, motor vehicle insurance, household furnishings and operations, personal care, and education.
The indexes for airline fares, used cars and trucks, new vehicles, and apparel were among the major indexes that decreased in May.
CPI rose 2.4% for the 12 months ending May, after rising 2.3% in April. The all items less food and energy index rose 2.8% over the last 12 months. The energy index decreased 3.5% for the 12 months ending May. The food index increased 2.9% over the last year.
Core CPI was even more disappointing for the average PhD pundit as it rose 0.1% MoM (well below the +0.3% MoM expected), flat with April's +2.8% YoY - the lowest since March 2021...
Source: Bloomberg
Goods prices deflated...
Source: Bloomberg
Some more details on core CPI which rose 0.1% in May, following a 0.2% increase in April.
The shelter index increased 0.3% over the month.
The index for owners’ equivalent rent rose 0.3% in May and the index for rent increased 0.2 percent.
The lodging away from home index fell 0.1% in May.
The medical care index increased 0.3% over the month, following a 0.5% increase in April.
The index for hospital services increased 0.4% in May and the index for prescription drugs rose 0.6%.
The physicians’ services index fell 0.3% over the month.
The motor vehicle insurance index rose 0.7% in May, after rising 0.6% in April.
The index for household furnishings and operations increased 0.3% over the month.
The personal care index increased 0.5% in May, and the education index rose 0.3%.
In contrast, the index for airline fares fell 2.7% in May, after declining 2.8% in April.
The used cars and trucks index fell 0.5% over the month, and the new vehicles index (-0.3%) and apparel index (-0.4%) also declined.
Shelter inflation keeps falling...
May Rent inflation 3.81% YoY, down from 3.98% in April, lowest since Jan 2022.
May Shelter inflation 3.86% YoY, down from 3.99% in April, lowest since Nov 2021
On a YoY basis, Services cost price increases continue to slow while Goods prices accelerate very (very) modestly...
Source: Bloomberg
So, we guess we will just have to wait for NEXT MONTH to see the hyperinflationary hellscape that so many TV pundits told us would occur after Trump's terror tariffs were imposed.
Every month https://t.co/pbD9Cc3Wml
— zerohedge (@zerohedge) June 11, 2025Cue the excuse factory... just wait until next month...
US equity futures dropped into today's CPI print after traders weren't moved by the US-China trade talks, which saw the two two sides agree on a framework to implement last month’s Geneva deal with few actual details. There’s also nervousness ahead of inflation data: a hot reading would be a big risk factor for a market near record highs (see full preview here). As of 8:00am ET, S&P and Nasdaq 100 futures traded 0.2% lower but were off session lows; pre-market Mag7 names are mostly higher with TSLA (+2%) the standout after a contrite Elon Muskusk tweeted "I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far." Semis and Cyclicals are poised to outperform. In other trade news, US/Mexico were close to a deal on steel tariffs by using import caps, which would be higher than the previous cap, and would remove the 50% tariff on steel below said cap; this looks like a reversion to 2018 levels and may be a template for talks with Canada. The G7 summit will carry additional weight as we are a month away the expiration of the 90-day tariff delay, with only a US/UK framework on the tape. Elsewhere, the EU is said to see talks with the US going beyond a July 9 deadline. The yield curve is twisting steeper with 10Y yields higher, the USD is slightly higher and commodities rise with crude and gold higher after Trump told the NY Post that he’s getting “less confident” about nuclear talks with Iran; natgas and base metals also rallied with Ags are down. The key event today is the CPI report at 8:30am ET where economists expect a relatively tame number, with core inflation up 0.3% in May. Positioning suggests a hotter print will be punished more than a dovish one will be rewarded, according to JPMorgan.
In premarket trading, Tesla rose over 2% in, outperforming Magnificent 7 counterparts after Elon Musk expressed regret over his recent social-media outburst directed at Trump.
I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 11, 2025Other Mag7 moves: Alphabet -0.1%, Microsoft -0.4%, Apple little changed, Nvidia little changed, Amazon -0.4%, Meta Platforms -0.3%. Steel stocks fell as the US and Mexico close in on a deal that would remove 50% tariffs on steel imports up to a certain volume — seen to erode the advantage US steelmakers would have benefited from if imports from Mexico faced higher rates. (Cleveland-Cliffs drops 5%, Nucor -3%, Steel Dynamics -1.6%). Here are some other notable movers:
Tuesday’s thinly detailed outcome of the Trump administration’s trade talks with China in London left traders and investors underwhelmed. Markets were watching whether the world’s top two economies could damp down tensions that economists say have tipped the global economy into a downturn. After some 20 hours of negotiations, US officials said both sides had established a framework to revive the flow of sensitive goods, even though the plan still needs sign-off from Trump and Xi Jinping.
“A preliminary agreement doesn’t fill me with enthusiasm in terms of this being resolved,” Guy Miller, chief market strategist at Zurich Insurance Co., told Bloomberg TV. “This is going to continue to be pushed down the line.”
On Wednesday morning, Trump tweeted that the "deal with China is done" and that "we are getting a total of 55% tariffs, China is getting 10%."
In other trade news, a Federal Court of Appeals extended an earlier, short-term reprieve for the administration as it presses a challenge to a lower court ruling last month that blocked tariffs. Steel stocks are trading lower after Bloomberg reported the US and Mexico are closing in on a deal that would remove 50% tariffs on steel imports up to a certain volume.
Trade (non) deal aside, CPI is top of mind today. Economists expect a relatively tame number, with core inflation up 0.3% in May. Positioning suggests a hotter print will be punished more than a dovish one will be rewarded, according to JPMorgan (full CPI preview here). Economists expect a modest impact from tariff pass-through for goods that are mostly imported. They see inflation rising 0.3% from April after increasing 0.2% the previous month, excluding the volatile food and energy categories. The core CPI, which is regarded as a better indicator of underlying inflation, is seen accelerating for the first time this year — to 2.9% — on an annual basis.
The CPI report, along with producer price data due Thursday, will offer Federal Reserve officials a final look at inflation and the impact of high tariffs before they gather next week Traders are increasingly betting that policymakers will cut rates only once this year.
“It is not expected to be market-moving for now but that could increase the scope for an impact from a big surprise,” said Geoff Yu, FX and macro strategist at Bank of New York Mellon Corp. “We expect a more data-driven session as some repositioning is needed ahead of a key central bank week.”
Investors have been shifting to under-owned, riskier pockets of the market like small caps and high-beta stocks, with Nomura strategist Charlie McElligott citing a “right-tail” risk. Nasdaq has led the recent US equity gains, while technicals are becoming tricky with RSI and MACD indicators showing a bearish divergence.
Global stocks are likely to rally another 3% into the end of the year, while in Europe, there’s scope for corporate earnings to see more upgrades, according to Citigroup.
Concerns about a ballooning US budget deficit and demand for long-end bonds have caused the yield on 30-year Treasuries to spike in recent weeks. A downgrade of US sovereign debt by Moody’s Ratings last month has prompted Hong Kong pension fund managers to form a preliminary plan to sell down their holdings if the US loses its last recognized top credit rating, Bloomberg News reported Wednesday.
In Europe, the Stoxx 600 is flat as banking and basic resources lead stocks, while the retail sector is the biggest laggard, with Inditex SA falling 6.4% after Zara owner’s sales missed estimates. Here are the most notable European movers:
Asian stocks rose, with sentiment lifted by a preliminary deal between the US and China to de-escalate trade tensions. The MSCI Asia Pacific Index rose as much as 0.4%, on track for a third day of gains. Chip stocks provided the biggest boost after TSMC posted a 40% increase in May revenue, in a sign of resilient AI demand. Most regional gauges were in the green. Chinese equities led gains in the region, with the onshore benchmark CSI 300 Index climbing 0.8%, the most in nearly a month. The Hang Seng China Enterprises Index gained as much as 1.4%. South Korea’s Kospi rose 1.2%, capping a sixth-straight daily advance. Risk-on trades got a lift after negotiators from the world’s two largest economies said they had agreed on a framework on how to implement the consensus reached in their prior round of discussions. Officials at the talks in London are expected to take the latest proposal back to their respective leaders in Washington and Beijing.
In FX, the Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index is little changed. The euro and Swiss franc are the best performing G-10 currencies, rising 0.2% each. The kiwi is the laggard with a 0.2% fall.
In rates, treasuries decline ahead of CPI data, following a bigger drop for UK gilts, where focus is on fiscal policy ahead of Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ spending review. US session includes May CPI data and 10-year note auction. US yields are 1bp-4bp cheaper across a steeper curve, with 2s10s and 5s30s spreads unwinding most of Tuesday’s flattening move. 10-year near 4.50% is ~3bp cheaper on the day; German counterpart is comparable; Gilts lead a selloff in European government bonds, pushing UK 10-year yields up ~6 bps to 4.60%. Bunds pare declines after solid demand at a 10-year auction.
In commodities, spot gold climbs $14 to around $3,337/oz. Oil prices swing, with WTI now up 0.9% to around $65.50.
Bitcoin finds itself in the red this morning, specifics for the space light after a handful of equity-related updates for the complex overnight.
To the day ahead now, and as we previewed earlier, look out for the US May CPI release as well as the federal budget balance data. Also worth mentioning that the US 10-yr treasury auction will be held. We’ll also get the Canada April building permits. In terms of central bank speakers, we’ll hear the ECB’s Lane and Cipollone speak. Earnings include Oracle and Inditex
Top Overnight News
Market Snapshot
Trade/Tariffs
A more detailed look at global markets courtesy of Newquawk
APAC stocks were mostly higher amid the recent trade-related optimism stemming from the US-China trade talks in London which have now concluded and where officials reached a framework to implement the Geneva consensus and outcome from the recent Trump-Xi call. ASX 200 advanced to print a fresh record high in early trade before paring some of the gains amid little fresh catalysts. Nikkei 225 marginally benefitted from recent currency weakness and softer-than-expected PPI data. Hang Seng and Shanghai Comp gained following the progress in US-China trade talks, albeit with the upside in the mainland capped given the lack of solid details.
Top Asian News
European bourses are generally marginally firmer, EuroStoxx 50 +0.2%, defying indications for a slightly softer cash open. However, this comes with the exception of the IBEX 35 -0.8%, given marked pressure in Inditex (-3.3%).
Sectors are mixed with Retail -1.0% the laggard given the above Inditex action. Basic Resources, Tech, Consumer Products & Services all benefit from the US-China updates. Stateside, futures are modestly into the red with subdued trade despite the framework agreement between US-China officials as we now await the response from President's Trump & Xi; ES -0.3%. Attention in the meantime firmly on CPI. NVIDIA (NVDA) CEO Huang says there is an inflection point happening in Quantum computing.
Top European News
FX
Fixed Income
Commodities
Geopolitics
Economic Data
DB's Jim Reid concludes the overnight wrap
I have a dark secret I'm holding onto at the moment. It's my birthday tomorrow and over the weekend our family photo stream had pictures of one of my presents. My wife is not as tech savvy as she could be. A voucher for a round with Rory Mcllroy? No sadly, but instead a portrait for my office (I assume) of our dog Brontë swinging a golf club dressed in plus fours. It's very amusing and cute. I will show surprise and gratitude tomorrow. If I do a WFH webinar again no doubt I'll show you all and you can smile or shake your head with horror.
Overnight, US and Chinese negotiators have said they've agreed on a framework of how to implement the agreement reached at talks in Geneva last month. The main details came from Commerce Secretary Lutnick, who said that “We do absolutely expect that the topic of rare earth minerals and magnets” will be resolved and that export controls implemented by the US should come down as China approves relevant export licenses. China’s trade representative Li Chenggang said that the US and Chinese delegations will now take the proposal back to their respective leaders, with Lutnick noting that “once the presidents approve it, we will then seek to implement it”. At the same time, there was no evidence of progress on topics such as the fentanyl-related 20% tariffs on China that the US has implemented since February. So while the mood music has stayed positive, investors may be wary of the pattern that emerged during the previous US-China trade talks in 2018-19, when apparently constructive in person meetings seemed to take a step back as the negotiating teams returned to their capitals. So there's perhaps a little disappointment this morning that we haven't yet got a bigger announcement, even though there's time to hear the full conclusions of the meeting.
In other trade news last night, the US Court of Appeals extended its temporary reprieve for the administration’s tariffs that had been blocked by the US Court of International Trade in late May, as it scheduled arguments in the case for July 31. So that leaves wide-ranging tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act in place, while confirming that the legal uncertainty over their use will remain unresolved until well after the July 9 deadline for the reciprocal tariff delay. Separately, Bloomberg reported yesterday that the US and Mexico are close to a deal that would remove 50% of steel imports from Mexico up to a certain quota, adding to the sense that sectoral tariffs are up for negotiation in US talks with trading partners.
Turning to yesterday’s market moves, given the focus on export controls that have affected chips and rare earth metals, and the hope the restrictions would be eased, semiconductor and technology stocks benefited, helping to lift US equities more broadly. For instance, the Philadelphia Semiconductor Stock Exchange (+2.06%) continued to rally on the hope for a positive outcome, advancing for the third consecutive day. Similarly, the Mag-7 also advanced +1.29% thanks to Tesla’s (+5.67%) continued recovery as well as decent gains for Alphabet (+1.43%) and Meta (+1.20%). And chipmaker TSMC was up +3.98% after the company reported monthly sales that climbed +39.6% in May.
Another notable story yesterday was a Bloomberg report that Treasury Secretary Bessent was being considered as a potential successor to Powell as Fed Chair. However, the report acknowledged that formal interviews for the role have not yet begun, and later in the day the White House denied that Bessent was a contender for the Fed job. The story follows comments by Trump last Friday that the decision on the next Fed Chair may be “coming out very soon” and yesterday our US economists published a note with initial thoughts on the topic of Powell’s replacement.
Looking forward, the focus will now turn back to inflation, with the May CPI results coming out later. Our US economists have a full preview here, and their view is that weak seasonally adjusted gas prices should continue to keep monthly headline CPI (+0.20% expected) below core inflation (+0.31% expected). A critical thing to look out for will also be the tariff pass-through, so they’ll be focusing on core goods prices, especially in categories like household furnishings and supplies categories, which saw some preliminary impact in the April data. Bear in mind that even with the 90-day tariff extension, the baseline 10% tariffs have still been in place for the entire month, and the reduction in the China tariffs from 145% to 30% wasn’t announced until May 12, so there were plenty of tariffs in place in May.
Speaking of inflation, there were fresh signs of inflationary pressure from the NFIB’s small business optimism index. In particular, a net 31% said they were planning to raise average selling prices, the highest share in over a year. But there was some brighter news, as the headline index showed that for the first time in 2025, small business had grown more optimistic, with the headline gauge up to 98.8 in May (vs. 96.0 expected), and up from 95.8 the previous month. So that points to a rebound in sentiment as the administration have dialled back tariffs in recent weeks.
Ahead of the CPI print, US Treasuries were pretty stable yesterday with an ongoing flattening of the curve. For instance, the 2yr yield (+1.6bps) moved up to 4.02%, whilst the 10yr yield (-0.4bps) fell to 4.47%, marking the flattest level of the 2s10s slope in two months. Those modest moves came amid an uneventful 3yr auction that saw $58bn of notes issued +0.4bps above the pre-sale yield. This will be followed by a 10yr auction today, and then a 30yr auction tomorrow, which will be an important focal point given recent fiscal fears.
Over in Europe, the latest UK labour market data pointed to growing weakness in Q2. In particular, the number of payrolled employees was down -109k in May (vs. -20k expected). Moreover, average weekly earnings growth fell to +5.3% in the three months ending April (vs. +5.5% expected). So that led investors to dial up the likelihood of rate cuts by the Bank of England, with the probability of a rate cut by the August meeting up to 81%. In turn, that meant gilts outperformed their European counterparts, with the 10yr yield falling -9.0bps. By contrast, there were smaller moves elsewhere, including for 10yr bunds (-4.1bps), OATs (-3.7bps) and BTPs (-5.1bps). The latest move also means the 10yr Italian-German spread edged down again to just 91.3bps, the tightest since February 2021.
European equities saw a mixed performance, with the STOXX 600 little changed (-0.02%). Defence stocks saw some pullback after their strong performance so far this year, with Rheinmetall (-5.80%), BAE Systems (-2.63%) and Thales (-3.63%) dragging European markets down. That left Germany’s DAX (-0.77%) and Italy’s FTSE MIB (-0.65%) underperforming for a second day running. On the other hand, France’s CAC (+0.17%) and UK’s FTSE 100 (+0.24%) posted modest gains, with the FTSE having been briefly on track for a record closing high intraday.
In Asia, the Hang Seng (+0.95%), the CSI (+0.82%), and the Shanghai Composite (+0.54%) are all making gains, supported by hopes for improved trade relations with the US even if S&P (-0.32%) and NASDAQ futures (-0.32%) seem a little disappointed we haven't got more information so far. Elsewhere, the KOSPI (+0.91%) is also on the rise, reaching a new 11-month high, while the Nikkei (+0.46%) is being pulled up by tech stocks.
Early morning data showed that producer prices in Japan increased by +3.25% y/y in May, a deceleration from a revised +4.1% rise the previous month and falling short of the market consensus of +3.5%. This marks the 51st month of producer inflation, although it is the lowest annual rate observed since last September.
To the day ahead now, and as we previewed earlier, look out for the US May CPI release as well as the federal budget balance data. Also worth mentioning that the US 10-yr treasury auction will be held. We’ll also get the Canada April building permits. In terms of central bank speakers, we’ll hear the ECB’s Lane and Cipollone speak. Earnings include Oracle and Inditex
Gov. Gavin Newsom was in his element this week. After scenes of burning cars and attacks on ICE personnel, Newsom declared that this was all “an illegal act, an immoral act, an unconstitutional act.” No, he was not speaking of the attacks on law enforcement or property. He was referring to President Donald Trump’s call to deploy the National Guard to protect federal officers.
Newsom is planning to challenge the deployment as cities like Glendale are cancelling contracts to house detainees and reaffirming that local police will not assist the federal government.
Trump has the authority under Section 12406 of Title 10 of the U.S. Code to deploy the National Guard if the president is “unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States.”
The Administration is saying that that is precisely what is unfolding in California, where mobs attack vehicles and trap federal personnel.
Most critics are challenging the deployment on policy grounds, arguing that it is an unnecessary escalation. However, even critics like Berkeley Law Dean Erwin have admitted that “Unfortunately, President Trump likely has the legal authority to do this.”
There is a fair debate over whether this is needed at this time, but the President is allowed to reach a different conclusion. Trump wants the violence to end now as opposed to escalating as it did in the Rodney King riots or the later riots after the George Floyd killings, causing billions in property damage and many deaths.
Courts will be asked to halt the order because it did not technically go through Newsom to formally call out the National Guard.
Section 12406 grants Trump the authority to call out the Guard and employs a mandatory term for governors, who “shall” issue the President’s order. In the memo, Trump also instructed federal officials “to coordinate with the Governors of the States and the National Guard Bureau.”
Newsom is clearly refusing to issue the orders or coordinate the deployment.
Even if such challenges are successful, Trump can clearly flood the zone with federal authority. Indeed, the obstruction could escalate the matter further, prompting Trump to consider using the Insurrection Act, which would allow troops to participate directly in civilian law enforcement.
In 1958, President Eisenhower used the Insurrection Act to deploy troops to Arkansas to enforce the Supreme Court’s orders ending racial segregation in schools.
The Trump Administration has already claimed that these riots “constitute a form of rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States.” In support of such a claim, the Administration could cite many of the Democratic leaders now denouncing the claim.
After January 6th, liberal politicians and professors insisted that the riot was an “insurrection” and, in claiming that Trump and dozens of Republicans could be removed from ballots under the 14th Amendment.
Liberal professors insisted that Trump’s use of the word “fight” and questioning the results of an election did qualify as an insurrection. They argued that you merely need to show “an assemblage of people” who are “resisting law” and “using force or intimidation” for “a public purpose.” The involvement of inciteful language from politicians only reinforced these claims. Sound familiar?
Democrats are using this order to deflect from their own escalation of the tensions for months. From Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz calling ICE officers “Gestapo” to others calling them “fascists” and “Nazis,” Democratic leaders have been ignoring objections that they are fueling the violent and criminal responses. It did not matter. It was viewed as good politics.
While Newsom and figures like Sen. Cory Booker (D., N.J.) have called these “peaceful” protests, rocks, and Molotov cocktails have been thrown at police as vehicles were torched. Police had to use tear gas, “flash bang” grenades, and rubber bullets to quell these “peaceful” protesters.
There appears little interest in deescalation on either side. For the Trump Administration, images of rioters riding in celebration around burning cars with Mexican flags are only likely to reinforce the support of the majority of Americans for the enforcement of immigration laws.
For Democrats, they have gone “all in” on opposing ICE and these enforcement operations despite support from roughly 30 percent of the public.
Some democrats are now playing directly to the mob. A Los Angeles City Council member, Eunisses Hernandez, reportedly urged anti-law enforcement protesters to “escalate” their tactics against ICE officers: “They know how quickly we mobilize, that’s why they’re changing tactics. Because community defense works and our resistance has slowed them down before… and if they’re escalating their tactics then so are we. When they show up, we gotta show up even stronger.”
So, L.A. officials are maintaining the sanctuary status of the city, barring the cooperation of local police, and calling on citizens to escalate their resistance after a weekend of violent attacks. Others have posted the locations of ICE facilities to allow better tracking of operations while cities like Glendale are closing facilities.
In Washington, Jeffries has pledged to unmask the identities of individual ICE officers who have been covering their faces to protect themselves and their families from growing threats.
While Democrats have not succeeded in making a convincing political case for opposing immigration enforcement, they may be making a stronger case for federal deployment in increasingly hostile blue cities.
* * *
Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University and the author of “The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage.”
Elon Musk publicly expressed regret over his recent X post attacks on President Donald Trump, admitting that his posts on X — particularly the one linking Trump to Jeffrey Epstein — "went too far."
"I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far," Musk wrote in an early morning X post.
I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 11, 2025The fallout stemmed from last week's blowout after Musk opposed Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill," prompting Trump to hint at cutting off government contracts. In response, Musk unleashed a series of now-deleted X posts, including a claim that Trump was "in the Epstein files."
Détente? Musk Hints At Path Forward On BBB; Trump Team Schedules Friday Call
'Very Disrespectful': Trump 'Assumes' Musk Relationship Is Over
To recap last week:
Earlier in the week, Musk came out against the 'Big Beautiful Bill' - which raises the debt ceiling by $5 trillion, and either raises the deficit by $2.4 trillion, or lowers it by $1.4 trillion - depending on who you believe, and fails to address any of the waste, fraud and abuse found by DOGE.
Thursday morning, Trump was asked about Musk's opposition to the bill, telling reporters on Thursday that he's 'very disappointed in Elon,' and that Musk only opposes the bill because they eliminated electric vehicle tax credits from it.
Trump then suggested he might pull government funding from Musk's companies such as SpaceX, which owns the only operational US spacecraft capable of transporting astronauts to and from the International Space Station. "The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!" -President Donald Trump via Truth Social
Musk went ballistic - announcing he would 'immediately' decommission the Dragon program (which he later walked back Thursday night), proposed a new political party (that's still his pinned post on X), endorsed another Trump impeachment, and said in a now-deleted post Trump is 'in the Epstein files,' which is why they haven't been released.
Now that the dust has settled in the Trump-Musk feud, the president stated there would be consequences for Musk if he supports Democratic candidates opposing the tax and spending bill.
Musk stated in a CBS interview that BBB "undermines" the work of DOGE... The Trump administration has refuted this point.
On Monday, Trump said he had no plans to discontinue Starlink service at the White House but hinted he might have his Tesla Model S removed from the White House grounds.
"I may move the Tesla around a little bit, but I don't think we'll be doing that with Starlink. It's a good service," Trump told reporters.
Trump also said that he would not have a problem if Musk called him: "We had a good relationship, and I just wish him well."
Musk's actions over the past several days suggest his anger has subsided and that he may be seeking to repair his relationship with the president.
As we noted last week...
For better or worse, the BBB will pass. Instead of clashing over what is autopilot spending to satisfy legacy obligations, focus on how to generate the biggest GDP growth https://t.co/bw6DQ4pBVa
— zerohedge (@zerohedge) June 5, 2025Odds are looking great on Polymarket...
Source: Polymarket https://t.co/UtjqsaIWrU
— zerohedge (@zerohedge) June 6, 2025However, we do agree with Musk on codifying DOGE cuts—after all, it's a clear mandate from the American people for the president to rein in a bloated federal government long captured by deep-state swamp creatures.
Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) will start a new journal that will help change the culture of science, the agency’s director said in a newly released interview.
“The NIH can stand up and will stand up a journal where these replication results can be published and made searchable in an easy way,” Dr. Jay Bhattacharya said in a four-hour podcast interview with Andrew Huberman, a professor at the Stanford University School of Medicine, released on June 9.
Bhattacharya said he envisions people being able to see summaries of similar papers that looked at the same questions.
“A scientific journal put out by the NIH, a high-profile journal will then make publishing replication work a high-profile scientific, high-prestige scientific activity,” he added later.
Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said in May that federal scientists would likely be told to stop publishing in medical journals and, if that happened, the NIH would launch journals that would publish the scientists’ research.
Kennedy said that the existing journals have problems such as not publishing all of the data that underpins studies, while Bhattacharya said the journals will not publish replication research. Both officials have said they want the government to devote resources to replication, with Kennedy estimating that 20 percent of the NIH budget be designated for that purpose.
Replication is the process of taking a study, repeating it, and seeing if the results are the same.
While some scientists conduct meta-analyses, or studies that sum up existing literature on a topic—which could be considered a form of replication—“it’s really difficult to make a career out of doing replication work as a general matter,” Bhattacharya said in the podcast.
Scientists cannot at present earn large grants from the NIH for such work, which means the scientists cannot receive tenure at a top university, he said. That dissuades young scientists from focusing on replication work.
“We don’t reward it. The NIH doesn’t reward it,” Bhattacharya said. “That will change.”
The new journal will also publish negative results, or when scientists try to replicate a study and fail.
Emphasizing replication will make scientific literature more reliable, according to Bhattacharya, including for drug discovery and individual behavior, and will change the culture of science so that it “rewards truth ... rather than influence,” he added later.
Huberman, a neuroscientist, said that he welcomed the new journal and the focus on replication. “Everything you’re saying is very reassuring, and should be reassuring to people,” he said. “It’s music to my ears, frankly.”
The interview was released the same day some NIH employees signed a declaration that called cuts to NIH grants harmful and urged Bhattacharya to restore them. The NIH has terminated more than 2,000 grants totaling some $9.5 billion, as well as $2.6 billion in contracts, the employees said. The Trump administration is also proposing a smaller budget for the NIH in the next fiscal year.
Huberman noted that some grants that were labeled as diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) were cut and questioned Bhattacharya on whether the cuts included grants with the word transgenic. Bhattacharya said that there’s been an appeal process set up and researchers whose grants should not have been cut can file with the government. Some grants that were cut have been restored.
The NIH director said that it’s important to carry out research on vulnerable populations, and there are legitimate scientific questions where race or sex matters, such as breast cancer.
“The NIH absolutely supports that kind of research still despite all of the changes,” he said.
Bhattacharya also said that DEI is centered on the idea that structural racism is primarily responsible for the health outcomes of minorities and that he could not think of a scientific experiment that would in principle falsify that idea. Researchers who want to conduct studies based on the idea will not receive funding, he indicated.
“Let’s focus on the mission,” Bhattacharya said. “The mission is how do we advance, how do we make investments in research that advance the health and longevity of the American people ... I don’t believe there’s any place for this sort of race essentialism in it.”
Vatican City – On Sunday, June 29, 2025, on the Solemnity of Saints Peter and Paul, His Holiness Pope Leo XIV will preside over the Eucharistic Celebration in St. Peter’s Basilica at 9:30 a.m. During the Mass, he will personally bless and bestow the Pallia upon the new Metropolitan Archbishops, restoring a tradition that had been suspended by Pope Francis in 2015. Press title for full story:
Does Western Civilization Have Enough Belief to Continue to Exist?
Paul Craig Roberts
Democrats for many long years have imposed race and gender privileges, which violate the 14th Amendment’s requirement of equal protection under law and the 1964 Civil Rights Act’s statutory prohibition of race and gender quotas. In order to give preferences to women, people of color, and sexual perverts at the expense of white heterosexual men, equal protection of law was set aside. Now Democrats are proving to us that they are only concerned with alleged rights of people of color who are immigrant-invaders and assigned by Democrats, such as the Democrat governor of California, the rights of US citizens.
The Democrats are responding to the Federal government’s effort to deport people who are unlawfully in the US by attempting to organize an insurrection, a real one not an alleged one used to imprison Trump supporters. To be clear, Democrat office holders at local, state, and federal levels together with George Soros funded NGOs, foundations, and the whore media are in a treasonous conspiracy against the government of the United States and its President and against American citizens.
The protest that soon became a riot against deporting illegal entrants began in one section of Los Angeles. Organizers spread it to San Francisco and to Texas. I do not know if the effort to spread the riots into every blue jurisdiction and to turn it into a full-scale insurrection will succeed. https://www.cnn.com/us/live-news/la-protests-ice-raids-trump-06-11-25
However, it does seem clear that the Democrats are sufficiently confident that they can create an insurrection, backed by the Democrat judges, that will give them bargaining power over the Trump administration’s deportation policy. California Governor Newsom who stands with illegal entrants against US law has given the federal government the finger and defied federal authorities to arrest him for his lead in an insurrection against the United States.
California Governor Gavin Newsom condemned the deployment of the National Guard as unlawful and filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, accusing it of violating state sovereignty.
What we will see is whether the federal government is too weak to arrest or even acknowledge an insurrectionist.
If the Democrats succeed in constraining the deportation policy, the likely outcome will be that proven criminals and recent arrivals are subjected to deportation, but illegals who have put down roots have acquired citizenship according to the law of adverse possession will be granted amnesty.
I think it is unrealistic to believe that the Trump administration can deport 30 million illegals who have established their own livelihoods and existence in the US courtesy of the absence of enforcement of US laws. The open border policy of the Democrats is clearly a US invitation to immigrant-invaders to enter America unopposed. Unopposed entry implies acceptance of entry. In effect, deportation is a breach of an unwritten promise extended by the non-enforcement of US immigration laws.
All of this said, let’s turn to the real problem. The United States has a political party–the Democrats–which by its control of the major cities in swing states can steal elections at will. The whore media, together with lawsuits against, and prosecutions of, those who have factual evidence of electoral theft, brought before Democrat judges and juries who have no interest in facts, guarantees the validation of the election theft as the legitimate vote. I do not know if Trump has yet pardoned all those who produced conclusive evidence that his 2020 reelection was stolen. They were prosecuted by the Biden regime’s US Department of Justice (sic) and by Democrat states for doing so. In the Democrat Biden regime anyone in American who told the truth was a target for prosecution and imprisonment. Yet tens of millions of dumbshit Americans supported the corrupt Biden regime.
In the 2024 presidential election the American Ruling Establishment decided that they would allow Trump to be returned to office, where he would be frustrated and defeated at every turn by the Establishment’s power, with the result being Trump’s failure and the demoralization of Americans who attempted to restore accountable government with Trump’s election. Demoralized and defeated, “the Trump Deplorable” go home and accept their impotence.
Possibly if the Democrats succeed in creating an insurrection, Trump will respond, unlike the French President in The Camp of the Saints, with sufficient violence to put it down and follow up with the arrest, prosecution, and execution of the treasonous Democrats responsible.
But this assumes he has the military on his side. Does he after 12 years of Obama/Biden anti-white, anti-normal American appointees to the officer ranks? Does the US military any longer represent majority white America? Do the Hispanic elements in California’s National Guard represent the US or Mexico?
Americans, being dumbshits, don’t realize how far things have gone. They now have Hispanic, Asian, Arab and other Muslim peoples, and African immigrants as judges who are immigrant-invaders presiding over local, state, and federal courts and police forces.
My own opinion is that Americans, like Europeans, having sat sucking their thumbs, entertaining themselves, and being deceived by official narratives and multicultural brainwashing have lost their country.
If you look honestly at the US today and at Britain, France, Germany, Canada, and the rest, what is there to defend? Why would a white heterosexual male die for Washington, or for the UK, France, Germany, Canada, or any of the other countries that have repudiated their ethnic nationality?
The most significant fact of our time is that the entire Western World is a dead man walking bereft of the belief system that upheld Western Civilization, now routinely denounced in all major universities in the Western World.
Do the Democrats Have Insurrection Underway in America ?
PCR with Nima on Dialogue Works
https://x.com/Dialogue_NRA/status/1932460907088826407?s=19
This interview was taken down by YouTube as soon as it was posted, which proves the point that serious issues cannot be acknowledged and discussed. Just as official narratives prevailed over reality in the Biden, Obama, and Bush regimes, official narratives continue to prevail. Print, TV, and social media continue to censor.
Who’s behind LA’s Anti-ICE Riots?
https://sputnikglobe.com/20250609/whos-behind-la-anti-ice-riots-1122221077.html
How to Recover from the Covid vax
If you took the Covid vaccination and have experienced health consequences, here is what you can do:
Dr. William Makis reports daily on his website his successes in curing stage 4 cancer with Ivermectin and Fenbendazole:
Dr Russell Blaylock reports in his monthly Wellness Report (worth taking for $50 annually) that the spike protein introduced into the body by the “Covid vax” is destroyed by a dose of nattokinase, 2,000 FU twice a day taken on an empty stomach. Nano-curcumin detaches the spike protein from the blood vessel wall. Add a dose of zinc 50mg twice a week for 3 weeks, then once a week thereafter.
After a full second day of discussion on the US-China trade deal, we finally have... something.
As Bloomberg reports, just before midnight London time, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and China’s Vice Commerce Minister Li Chenggang both said they have agreed in principle on "a framework for implementing the Geneva consensus" combined with the outcome of the leaders June 5th call.
“Once the presidents approve it, we will then seek to implement it,” Lutnick added.
If it sounds confusing, it is: the parties said they will implement a framework which was already agreed upon weeks ago... so what exactly were the talks for? Shouldn't there have been at least some token progress beyond what was already agreed upon, hence "consensus."
Lutnick adding that “We absolutely expect that the topic of rare earth minerals and magnets… will be resolved in this framework implementation," does not make it any clearer if there is any actual deal on rare earths and/or chips... or just an agreement to continue talks?
Lutnick continued: “Also, there were a number of measures the US put on when those rare earths were not coming… You should expect those to come off — sort of, as President Trump said, in a balanced way. When they approve the licenses, then you should expect that our export implementation will come down as well” which suggests that nothing has been resolved at this stage, and instead we just wait for China to start exporting rare earth minerals?
And yes, for all the pomp and circumstance, it appears that all that took place in the past 48 hours was some meetings over coffee and KFC, because as Lutnick also said, the "framework is a first step, we had to get the negativity out."
Well, the negativity may be out, but no actual deals or agreements are in; instead agreement was reached to implement the implementation of an already agreed upon consensus.
Finally, the Commerce secretary said that the idea behind the framework is to increase trade with China, which is great but wasn't the whole point of the negotiation to rebalance trade, not merely increase it? After all, it's very easy to receive even more Chinese exports and "increase trade."
Meanwhile, US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said there were no other meetings scheduled, but added that the American and Chinese sides talk frequently and are able to do so whenever they need.
US-China trade talks wrapped up in London just before midnight.
“We have reached a framework to implement the Geneva consensus,” Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick tells us.
“Once the presidents approve it, we will then seek to implement it.” pic.twitter.com/eMu3xRb4y6
On the news, gold fell through 3320 but promptly rebounded as the market realized that what the announcement effectively boils down to is that the two sides have agreed to speak more.
Spoos were trading at 6,040, before jerking higher, lower, and at last check trading unchanged from where they closed the regular session.
In FX, cross-JPY buying morphed into broad USD selling with cross-JPY not really gaining traction; USDJPY is back under 145 after rising to a high of 145.10.
North American grocery wholesaler United Natural Foods (UNFI), the primary distributor for Whole Foods Market, has been hit by a cyberattack that temporarily paralyzed U.S. operations. The company is working to restore systems by the weekend. The disruption has already led to reports of empty shelves at some Whole Foods locations due to delayed shipments.
Last Thursday, UNFI revealed in a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that it "activated its incident response plan and implemented containment measures, including proactively taking certain systems offline," after uncovering unauthorized network activity on its systems.
"The incident has caused, and is expected to continue to cause, temporary disruptions to the Company's business operations," the Form 8-K continued, adding, "The Company is working actively to assess, mitigate, and remediate the incident with the assistance of third-party cybersecurity professionals and has notified law enforcement."
Fast forward to Monday, UNFI told customers in an email obtained by Bloomberg that it was "working toward the goal of returning to full operational capacity by Sunday or sooner," while apologizing for the disruption.
What's happened so far (via Bloomberg):
Operations Halted: UNFI shut down all business systems, including ordering and shipping, after detecting intruders in its network.
Customer Impact: Forklift operators were sent home, and some resumed work using pen-and-paper systems. Clients like National Co+op Grocers made special requests to keep top-selling products moving.
Response: UNFI is working with cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike and has reported the incident to the FBI. CEO Sandy Douglas said the situation is being handled by "a strong team of experts."
No Payroll Disruptions Expected.
Whole Foods: Confirmed supply disruptions; shelves in some Manhattan stores were visibly empty.
UNFI CEO Sandy Douglas informed investors during a Tuesday earnings call that intruders had compromised its IT systems, and backend systems related to the supply chain were down.
"We believe we are managing the incident capably with a very strong team of inside and outside professionals, including specialized experts," Douglas said, adding, "We will continue to keep our customers, suppliers and associates regularly updated on our progress and next steps."
Bloomberg reported that at least one Whole Foods location in Manhattan had partially empty shelves as a result of the disruption.
X users report disruptions...
At Whole Foods just now. Lotsa shelves empty
I asked what’s going on. One of the largest food distributors in the US got cyberattacked
That’s umm troubling the food supply can be disrupted this way pic.twitter.com/GG9UsftcI4
Tech blog BleepingComputer noted about the increasing cyber threats targeting America's food supply chain:
UNFI is just the latest company in the food industry to have been breached in recent years. For instance, in March, Walmart-owned warehouse supermarket chain Sam's Club disclosed it was investigating claims of a Clop ransomware breach. Food giant JBS Foods, the world's largest beef producer, also paid an $11 million ransom in 2021 after a REvil ransomware attack forced it to shut down production at multiple sites worldwide.
The key takeaway: UNFI's cyberattack underscores the fragility of the U.S. just-in-time supply chain and its heavy reliance on vulnerable IT infrastructure.
Our view—well known to readers—is clear: Take control of your food supply. Whether that means planting a garden, raising chickens, or building direct relationships with local ranchers and farmers, the message is the same: stop relying on globalist multinational corporations.
Authored by Gary Abernathy via The Empowerment Alliance,
The “One Big Beautiful Bill” – designed to put most of President Trump’s campaign promises into action – squeaked through the House of Representatives on May 22 and was immediately greeted by expressions of horror from activists and corporations invested in so-called “alternative” energy.
The big business interests that drive the solar and wind boom have for years operated at a huge advantage. Most startups historically identify a need and create a quality product or service to meet the demand in the hope of becoming profitable within a few years. By contrast, the “renewables” industry has had the backing of the United States government in the form of tax incentives designed to virtually guarantee success. Even with so much government largesse, it’s astounding how many solar companies have been so badly managed that they have gone out of business.
Still, with Uncle Sam cheering them on, solar companies have converted more than a million acres of cropland and pastures to unsightly collections of solar panels. The rapid deployment often stirred controversy, pitted neighbor against neighbor, and sent state lawmakers scurrying to craft new and evolving rules and regulations.
Many people viewed the encroachment of solar as a blight on generational farmland, as ugly glass and metal panels replaced corn, soybean, wheat and other crops. Some landowners, though, eagerly grabbed the lifeline offered by solar companies in the form of per-acre sale or lease prices that were far above average market values, in many cases allowing them to escape mountains of farming debt.
As I wrote in a Washington Post column a few short years ago about a public hearing I attended on the topic of solar developments in southern Ohio, “The testimony was sometimes heart-wrenching. Some members of multigenerational farm families who have made deals with the solar companies spoke with tears in their eyes. Farming is in their blood, and in a perfect world they would continue the family tradition. But for them, it’s been a long time since the world was perfect.”
The kicker, of course, is that solar companies were able to offer such lucrative deals almost entirely because of subsidies and tax incentives offered by the Obama administration, curtailed somewhat by the first Trump administration, but reinvigorated on steroids by the Biden administration’s misleadingly named Inflation Reduction Act.
In a follow-up Post column in 2021, I noted that suspicions about the solar installations were increasing. “Questions are growing about neighboring property values and environmental issues,” I wrote. “What about responsible land practices such as plant maintenance, erosion protection and water runoff? When the solar fields are dismantled someday, will the soil be safe for reuse? Solar companies are providing answers, but trust is not always evident.”
For solar, the return of Trump and GOP congressional control means the gravy train might be rolling to a stop. The budget passed by the House ended many tax credits for companies installing rooftop solar panels, but, more importantly, the bill “also ends the investment and electricity production credits for clean energy facilities that begin construction 60 days after the legislation is enacted or enter service after Dec. 31, 2028. Those credits have played a key role in the rapid expansion of utility-scale solar projects in the U.S.,” as CNBC reported. Solar stocks immediately plunged.
But political considerations are always in play, and it’s telling that the House budget bill “left the manufacturing tax credit relatively unscathed.” That’s almost certainly because of the fact that domestic solar component manufacturing is well underway, including in many red states where members of Congress aren’t anxious to pull the plug on jobs that benefit local communities – even if they are based on the artificial tax subsidies from a government picking winners and losers.
When it comes to energy, the House bill will likely see some revisions in the Senate. Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) was probably smart, politically, when he said he would push for a slower phase-out of clean energy subsidies.
“For companies that have made major capital deployment decisions, we need to respect that or people are going to start thinking that the United States has massive changes in policy every two years in this space, and that will be devastating to the U.S.’s current position as the innovation leader,” Tillis said.
As Doc Holliday said in the movie “Tombstone,” that’s the damnable misery of it. Subsidies have backed the manufacture of solar initiatives in state after state, so while there are endless unknowns about the future, jobs are here now, at least in the short term. Abruptly shutting them down would give Democrats an election issue that a slow phaseout might help to avoid, or at least alleviate.
An “all-of-the-above” approach to energy is a popular political slogan, and indeed, alternatives will continue to be part of our energy mix. But recent blackouts, brownouts and general grid failures around the world due to an overreliance on solar demonstrate that the various resources that make up “all of the above” are not created equal. They do not generate equal energy, or give consumers the same dollar-for-dollar value.
The success of “alternatives” should be based on merit. Are they affordable? Are they effective? Are they reliable? Are they in demand? Our system of capitalism decides winners and losers. When government bureaucrats try to make those calls, taxpayers end up footing inflated bills for inferior products. That outcome should be an alternative no one supports.
Gary Abernathy is a longtime newspaper editor, reporter and columnist. He was a contributing columnist for the Washington Post from 2017-2023 and a frequent guest analyst across numerous media platforms. He is a contributing columnist for The Empowerment Alliance, which advocates for realistic approaches to energy consumption and environmental conservation. Abernathy’s “TEA Takes” column will be published every Wednesday and delivered to your inbox!
As Pope Leo XIV enters the firing line of the homosexual lobby following his re-statement of Catholic teaching on marriage, it’s the painful duty of Catholics respectfully to resist Bishop Terence Drainey, who continues to advance the LGBT+ agenda in his diocese of Middlesbrough, UK, and all bishops who subvert Catholic teaching. The Diocese of Middlesbrough LGBT+ Ministry was established, ostensibly, […]
The post Catholics must respectfully resist Bishop Drainey’s promotion of the LGBT+ agenda appeared first on Voice of the Family.
Extract of Christian Fashion in the History of the Church by Virginia Coda-Nunziante (Calx Mariae Publishing, 2022). Letter to those responsible for Catholic associations and education, 12 June 1960 This year, the first signs of our late-arriving spring showed a certain increase in the use of men’s dress by girls and women; even by mothers […]
The post Concerning men’s dress worn by women appeared first on Voice of the Family.
From Divine Intimacy Presence of God “I return thanks to You, O God, one and true Trinity, one sovereign divinity, holy and indivisible unity. ” (Roman Brieviary) 1 From Advent until Trinity Sunday, the Church has had us consider the magnificent manifestations of God’s mercy toward men: the Incarnation, the Redemption, Pentecost. Now she directs […]
The post The Source of Mercy: on the feat of the most Holy Trinity appeared first on Voice of the Family.
Above: Allegory of the Holy Eucharist by Miguel Cabrera (1750). From the Roman Office. ℣. Grant, Lord, a blessing. Benediction. May the Gospel’s holy lection Be our safety and protection. ℟. Amen. Reading 1 Continuation of the Holy Gospel according to John John 6:44-52 At that time, Jesus said unto the multitudes of the Jews: No man can come to Me, except the Father…
On May 20th, Google CEO Sundar Pichai updated the public on the company’s progress on its AI development as follows: We are now processing 480 trillion monthly tokens, a nearly 50X increase in just one. Over 7 million developers are […]
The post The Google AI Buildout In Plain English appeared first on RIA.
By falling significantly short of its intended savings goals, the DOGE program underscores the substantial challenges that hinder efforts to reduce federal spending and cut the deficit. Furthermore, its failure suggests that a more expedient way to reduce the deficit […]
The post Deficits And The Tradeoffs Required To Fix Them appeared first on RIA.
Jefferies Financial Group is ramping up its outsourced trading business by hiring 17 new traders, aiming to tap into the growing trend of asset managers looking to cut costs and expand their trading capabilities, according to Bloomberg.
The firm has already recruited nine traders and plans to hire eight more, extending its services to fixed-income products in addition to its existing equities desk.
This expansion comes as more asset managers consider outsourcing their trading operations. UBS’s exit from the outsourced trading business earlier this year has opened opportunities for competitors to gain market share. “A main theme has been the increase in the larger asset managers looking at this,” said Amy Thorne at Northern Trust. “This is not just a cost play.”
Outsourced trading allows money managers to execute trades during busy periods, access new markets, or even replace their entire trading divisions. Advocates say it provides better pricing and access to major counterparties, while critics worry it could erode market knowledge and relationships.
Jesse Forster at Crisil Coalition Greenwich said, “The buy-side’s doing more with less these days. So those hesitancies are wearing away, but there is still an element of: ‘Hey, I’m giving up a little bit of control. Is my boss going to like them better than me? Are they going to do too good of a job?’”
Bloomberg writes that to address potential conflicts, Jefferies stresses that its outsourced traders operate independently. “The information barriers we have in place ensure full segregation of order flow,” said Dean Gray, Jefferies’ head of international outsourced trading.
Other firms are also entering the market. Clear Street has hired six traders so far, with plans to grow to 20 within 18 months. Cantor Fitzgerald is expanding its offering to crypto, while Northern Trust and Marex Group are scaling up globally. “They don’t have to build their own infrastructure and capability, that’s what these firms are plugging into,” said Jack Seibald at Marex.
Data from a 2024 State Street survey shows nearly three-quarters of institutional investors plan to use outsourced trading for foreign exchange, and 67% plan to use it for derivatives.
Rebecca Crowe at Bank of New York Mellon said, “Eventually the drive for returns and client outcomes has to win.”
This year, 2025, marks 1,250 years of the German region of Westphalia, the place where a celebrated treaty was signed in 1648 which laid the legal foundations of the modern nation state. Ours is now an age of globalists, however, at least on the EU-governed continent of mainland Europe, where, at the behest of the little people’s political “betters,” all expressions of traditional national and…
Not long ago, a bright and thoughtful young woman opened up during a retreat small group. She shared that she had recently come to view her upbringing as “traumatic.” Gently, the group leader asked her to elaborate. The young woman hesitated, then she offered: “Well…my dad was strict. He didn’t really validate my emotions. He focused on my behavior not my heart. He expected a lot—too much…
Authored by Yeny Sora Robles via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),
The pistol used to shoot Colombian presidential candidate Sen. Miguel Uribe Turbay was purchased in the U.S. state of Arizona, the South American country’s top police officer said Monday.
Speaking at a press event, Gen. Carlos Fernando Triana of the Colombian National Police said, “According to the verification carried out by the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, within the framework of international cooperation, the firearm was purchased on August 6, 2020, in Arizona, United States, that is, it was purchased legally.”
Monday’s media event follows Uribe’s being shot twice at close range in the head and once in the leg during a pre-campaign event in the Modelia neighborhood of Bogotá on Saturday. Uribe, 39, who is of the conservative Centro Democrático party, remains hospitalized in critical condition.
El momento en que el disparan contra @MiguelUribeT, senador, precandidato presidencial y nieto del expresidente Julio César Turbay, durante un mitin en Bogotá https://t.co/dVWNPngstZ
— Pascal (@beltrandelrio) June 7, 2025Triana further told the media that the Colombian Attorney General’s Office is investigating the shooting with the assistance of the country’s army and international cooperation to investigate how the weapon entered the country.
Luz Adriana Camargo Garzón, attorney general of Colombia, told the media event that investigators are also trying to identify whether the firearm used against Uribe has been involved in other similar attacks.
The alleged shooter, a 15-year-old boy from a poor neighborhood in Bogotá, was shot in the leg by police as he attempted to flee the scene and was captured.
The motive behind the attack remains unclear.
The Santa Fe Foundation clinic, which is treating Uribe, issued a statement about his condition early on Monday.
“After completing the neurosurgical and left thigh procedures, he was transferred to intensive care for postoperative stabilization. His condition is extremely serious, and the prognosis is reserved,” the foundation stated on Monday.
His wife, Maria Claudia Tarazona, sent a message asking people to pray for him.
“Miguel is currently fighting for his life. Let us ask God to guide the hands of the doctors who are treating him. I ask everyone to join us in a chain of prayer for Miguel’s life. I put my faith in God,” she said in a post on X.
Uribe is the son of journalist Diana Turbay, who was kidnapped by Pablo Escobar’s Medellín cartel and killed during a botched rescue operation in 1991. He is also the grandson of former President Julio César Turbay, who served as the country’s leader from 1978 to 1982. Uribe was a councilman in Bogotá, secretary of government in Enrique Peñalosa’s mayoral office, and, since 2022, has held a seat in the Senate for the Democratic Center.
Weeks after Germany decided to reverse course and 're-embrace' nuclear power following their supreme idiocy on the matter, the UK government announced on Tuesday that it would invest 14.2 billion pounds (US$19.3 billion) to build a new nuclear plant in the southeast of England.
The move was revealed by the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero as part of its broader spending review, which will lay out priorities for the next four years.
The new plant, named Sizewell C, will be located in Suffolk county, and is predicted to create around 10,000 jobs during construction, according to a government statement. Once operational, it will create enough electricity power roughly 6 million homes.
"We need new nuclear to deliver a golden age of clean energy abundance, because that is the only way to protect family finances, take back control of our energy, and tackle the climate crisis," said Energy Minister Ed Miliband. "This is the government’s clean energy mission in action, investing in lower bills and good jobs for energy security."
As the Epoch Times notes further, the UK has also been tapping up new investors to fund the construction of Sizewell C, but no new partners were mentioned in the announcement.
Neither the total cost of construction nor a date for expected completion has been announced.
Sizewell C was originally an EDF Energy project but is now majority-owned by the British government, with EDF Energy a minority shareholder.
EDF Energy is the British arm of Électricité de France (EDF), which is wholly owned by the French state.
The UK government’s stake was 83.8 percent and EDF’s stake was 16.2 percent at the end of December, EDF’s financial results showed in February.
Sizewell C would be just the second new nuclear plant built in Britain in more than 20 years, after another EDF project, Hinkley Point C, which was first announced in 2010.
Hinkley Point C, based in Somerset, southwest England, has been beleaguered by delays and budget overruns and is currently expected to come online in 2029.
Sizewell C would be the third power station built on the site after Sizewell A and Sizewell B, both of which are currently in the process of being decommissioned.
The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero also announced that it had picked Rolls-Royce SMR to build Britain’s first small modular reactors (SMRs).
About 2.5 billion pounds ($3.4 billion) of government funds will be dedicated to the SMR program over the next four years, in a bid to get one of Europe’s first small-scale nuclear industries going.
SMRs are usually around the size of two football fields and composed of parts that can be assembled in a factory, making them quicker and cheaper to build than conventional plants.
The moves by Britain come amid a renewed interest in nuclear power across Europe, sparked by spiraling energy costs due to the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine, which is hampering the continent’s supply of natural gas.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said in a keynote speech in August 2024 that the European Union needed more nuclear power.
As Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's ruling government coalition stands on the brink of being toppled by a bill that would dissolve the country's parliament and force new elections, US ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee has controversially inserted himself into the country's domestic affairs by lobbying ultra-Orthodox members of Netanyahu's coalition -- urging them to rethink their plans to vote in favor of the measure.
The rebellion by the ultra-Orthodox parties springs from their anger over the prospect of ultra-Orthodox youth being included in the country's military draft -- after having been exempt from conscription since Israel's 1948 founding. Last summer, Israel's Supreme Court ruled that the government must start drafting the Haredi men, who typically dedicate their entire lives to religious study. Since then, the ultra-Orthodox have been pushing hard for the Knesset to pass legislation to render the Supreme Court decision on the subject moot. With the IDF poised to conscript 54,000 Haredi yeshiva students in July, the parties have been boycotting various votes and are now poised to tip the scales in favor of new elections.
According to polling, Netanyahu would be thrown to the curb in a new election. Enter Huckabee. The former Arkansas governor and fervent Evangelical Christian Zionist has been meeting with senior Haredi politicians, imploring them to give Netanyahu more time to solve the draft crisis. His pitches reportedly include a caution that “government stability is important for dealing with the Iranian issue.” (Pursuing a resolution of tensions over Iran's nuclear program, Trump administration diplomats will have a sixth round of talks with Iranian counterparts on Sunday in Oman's capital, Muscat.) Another report has Huckabee telling ultra-Orthodox leaders that "Washington will have difficulty supporting Israel during an election period," though it isn't clear what means, exactly.
As you might expect, Huckabee's intervention isn't appreciated by opposition members working to trigger new elections. Opposition Leader Yair Lapid diplomatically said he hoped the reports were untrue:
“Since I have no doubt that Ambassador Huckabee respects Israel’s independence and its democracy, I hope and believe that the report that he is interfering in Israel’s internal politics and trying to help Netanyahu [deal with] the ultra-Orthodox in the military draft law crisis are not true. Israel is not a protectorate.”
So far, Huckabee has been tight-lipped about his machinations. “He is holding meetings with various Israeli figures. The content of those conversations remains private,” a Huckabee spokesperson told Channel 13. The outlet reported that Netanyahu is aware of Huckabee's lobbying and is pleased about it. Huckabee has long been aligned with right-wing, expansionist elements in Israel. “I consider [the two-state solution] no solution whatsoever,” he told a Republican Jewish Coalition audience in 2015, insisting that Israel has a "God-given...title deed" to all the land it controls -- including the West Bank -- or, as he insists on calling it, "Judea and Samaria."
Mike Huckabee, after being named Ambassador to Israel by Trump, declares "there is no occupation" of Palestinian territory by Israel. Rather, Israel has had the "rightful deed" to the territory since the days of Abraham. He says he'll be using Biblical terms like "Promised Land" pic.twitter.com/hRjlMpwcBM
— Michael Tracey (@mtracey) November 16, 2024The measure to dissolve the parliament was introduced last week by Israel's largest opposition party. There are 120 seats in the Knesset, and Netanyahu's coalition controls 68 of them. Of his coalition, 18 come from Israel's two main ultra-Orthodox parties, which means their defection would guarantee the dissolution of the Knesset and a new round of elections. Last week, two spiritual leaders of a faction of the ultra-Orthodox United Torah Judaism Party instructed members to move forward with an attempt to topple Netanyahu's government over the draft issue.
Netanyahu has been also been making the rounds with ultra-Orthodox Knesset members. On Monday, Israel's Channel 12 quoted Netanyahu as telling Haredi lawmakers, “We are in a dramatic period. There are extraordinary challenges on the table. This is a historic window of opportunity that will not return, and therefore, under no circumstances should the foundations of the government be shaken.”
Authored by Andrew Korybko via Substack,
It’s very difficult to imagine how Ukraine can prevent any further Russian advances after this...
The Russian Ministry of Defense announced on Sunday that their forces had entered Ukraine’s Dnipropetrovsk Region, which Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov confirmed is part of Putin’s buffer zone plan. This was foreseen as early as late August once the Battle of Pokrovsk began but has been achieved even without capturing that strategic fortress town. Russian forces simply went around it after breaking through the southern Donbass front. This development puts Ukraine in a dilemma.
It’ll now have to simultaneously fortify the Dnipropetrovsk front together with the southern Kharkov and northern Zaporozhye ones in case Russia uses its new position to launch offensives into any of those three. This could put serious strain on the Ukrainian Armed Forces as they’re already struggling to prevent a major breakthrough in Sumy Region from Kursk. Coupled with depleting manpower and questions about continued US military-intelligence aid, this might be enough to collapse the frontlines.
To be sure, that scenario has been bandied about many times over the past more than 1,200 days, but it nowadays appears tantalizingly closer than ever. Observers also shouldn’t forget that Putin told Trump that he’ll respond to Ukraine’s strategic drone strikes earlier this month, which could combine with the abovementioned two factors to achieve this long-desired breakthrough. Of course, it might just be a symbolic demonstration of force, but it could also be something more significant as well.
Ukraine’s best chances of preventing this are for the US to either get Russia to agree to freeze the frontlines or to go on another offensive.
The first possibility could be advanced by the carrot-and-stick approach of proposing a better resource-centric strategic partnership than has already been offered in exchange on pain of imposing crippling secondary sanctions on its energy clients (specifically China and India with likely waivers for the EU) and/or doubling down on military-intelligence aid if it still refuses.
As for the second, the 120,000 troops that Ukraine has assembled along the Belarusian border according to President Alexander Lukashenko last summer could either cross that frontier and/or one of Russia’s internationally recognized frontiers. Objectively speaking, however, both possibilities only stand a slim chance of success: Russia has made it clear that it must achieve more of its goals in the conflict before agreeing to any ceasefire while its success in pushing Ukraine out of Kursk bodes ill for other invasions.
The likelihood of Ukraine cutting its losses by agreeing to more of Russia’s demands for peace is nil. Therefore, it might inevitably opt, whether in lieu of the aforesaid scenarios or in parallel with one or both of them, to intensify its “unconventional operations” against Russia. This refers to assassinations, strategic drone strikes, and terrorism. All that will do, however, is provoke more (probably outsized) conventional retaliation from Russia and thus painfully delay Ukraine’s seemingly inevitable defeat.
With an eye towards the endgame, it appears as though an inflection point is about to be reached or already has been in the sense of irreversibly shifting the military-strategic dynamics in Russia’s favor. It’s very difficult to imagine how Ukraine can extricate itself from this dilemma. All signs point to this being impossible, though the conflict has already surprised observers on both sides before, so it can’t be ruled out. Nevertheless, it’s a far-fetched scenario, and it’s more likely that Ukraine’s official defeat is nigh.