One can readily admit that the Magisterium's manner of expression does not seem very easy to understand at times. It needs to be translated by preachers and catechists into a language which relates to people and to their respective cultural environments. The essential content of the Church's teaching, however, must be upheld in this process. It must not be watered down on allegedly pastoral grounds, because it communicates the revealed truth.
Distinction Matter - Subscribed Feeds
-
Site: PaulCraigRoberts.org
The Ever-widening War
Paul Craig Roberts
Scott Ritter says the attack on Russia’s strategic bombers was a British operation that the CIA knew about. https://www.youtube.com/live/5p_faUdJT3w
According to the White House, Trump was not informed. As Russian war doctrine calls for a strategic response to such an attack, both British and US intelligence risked launching a nuclear attack on the country or countries that Russia decided was responsible.
In other words, security agencies, not the president or Congress can launch a nuclear war. A stop must be put to the unaccountability of “security agencies” as clearly they have an independence of action that makes us very insecure.
Putin avoided his responsibility as defined by Russian war doctrine by classifying the attacks as terrorism and not acts of war. Putin substituted pretense for reality and has accepted an attack on Russia’s triad of nuclear forces as a non-event in order to keep alive the Kremlin’s unrealistic hopes of a peace deal that could turn into a broader agreement.
The ever-widening war continues to widen. The consequence of Putin’s good will is likely to be more provocative attacks. Sooner or later Russia will have to respond or surrender.
Can Reality Any Longer Be Acknowledged?
Paul Craig Roberts
https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2025/06/05/can-reality-any-longer-be-acknowledged/
The attack on Russian strategic forces by Ukraine, with or without President Trump’s knowledge and with or without help from Washington and the British, could have been the most dangerous event in East-West relations during my lifetime. The reason is that recently revised Russian war doctrine states that an attack, even by a non-nuclear country, on the Russian strategic triad requires a strategic response. Strategic usually means nuclear or at least a disabling response.
Putin dodged the responsibility (more later), but no one knew for certain that he would. In other words, whoever is responsible for the attack on Russia’s strategic bombers subjected Ukraine, Europe, the US to the possibility of nuclear attack, depending on whom the Russians decided was responsible. This person or persons is a madman, a maniac who must be identified and removed from his position. Try to imagine how it is possible for, say Zelensky, to launch an attack that could result in nuclear war between the US and Russia. How can control over whether or not the US faces nuclear war be in the hands of Zelensky? If Zelensky is responsible, the US and NATO have a massive failure in command and control. If Trump or someone in the Trump administration gave the green light, they should be removed for committing the most potentially dangerous act during my lifetime.
The extraordinarily reckless and extremely dangerous attack on Russia’s nuclear triad is being treated by all concerned as a nothing event, a mere terrorist act, not an act of war. The fact that there is no acknowledgement in Washington, Europe, Moscow, or the media of the seriousness of an attack on Russian strategic forces, and thereby no measures put in place to prevent such dangerous acts, means either full scale, not proxy, war between Russia and the West or Russia’s surrender. Perhaps Putin would like to surrender in order to avoid nuclear war, but he won’t be permitted to surrender.
Putin took the lead in burying the seriousness of the attack on Russia’s nuclear triad. By designating the attack a “terrorist act” he evades the responsibility that Russian strategic doctrine imposes on him for a strategic response.
Nothing of consequence has happened, says the President of Russia. Amen say Washington and Europe. Therefore, whoever is responsible for the attack knows that the next attack can go further. It too will be unacknowledged as an act of war.
How many times can Putin pretend that attacks on Russia’s sovereignty, which is what attacks on Russia’s nuclear triad are, are mere terrorist events before he discredits himself with the Russian people?
The purpose of the recent revision of Russian strategic doctrine was to discourage or prevent attacks by Western proxies such as Ukraine on Russian strategic forces. It failed because Putin has taught the West not to take him seriously. He is ever ready to turn the other cheek. Now Putin has shown that he will not acknowledge attacks on Russian strategic forces as anything other than a terrorist event, not an act of war. So Putin has negated Russian strategic doctrine. It means nothing. Now that the West knows this, Russia can expect escalating provocations. All of Putin’s good intentions have ended in disaster, and a major war will be the consequence.
It could be that Russia is doomed. Decades of successful Western propaganda have turned most of the Russian professional and intellectual class into Atlanticist Integrationists. They think that Russia belongs as part of the West and are willing to make concessions of sovereignty to be part of the West. Clearly this point of view is strong in the Kremlin and the Russian Foreign Ministry.
The zionist American neoconservatives are very much aware of this Russian weakness, and they are adept at taking advantage of it. They don’t have to do much, because Putin does their work for them.
Putin has declared Ukraine to be conducting terrorism, not war, against Russia. Putin’s declaration also absolves Washington and Europe for any responsibility.
Here are English language Russian headlines of Putin’s hiding from reality that apparently he is unable to face up to. Or perhaps he is not yet ready, being at work constructing a powerful military that US/NATO cannot resist.
“‘Illegitimate Kiev regime’ turning into terrorist organization” – Putin
“The latest terrorist acts carried out by Ukraine in Russia are the outcome of decisions made by the Ukrainian political leadership.” Putin added that “the decisions to carry out such crimes were, of course, made in Ukraine” by the political leadership in Ukraine. In other words, Washington and Europe have no responsibility for the act of war, which is not an act of war, but merely terrorism. https://www.rt.com/russia/618651-kiev-regime-rejecting-peace/
In other words, the Kremlin has said that Washington and Europe have nothing to do with the attack on Russia’s strategic triad, and that Ukraine is merely creating terrorist incidents, not making war against Russia. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2025/01/31/russia-ukraine-rubio-trump/? utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=wp_opinions
I find it hard to believe that Putin is this stupid. My bet is that he is not yet ready. He keeps the minor Ukraine conflict going while he builds up to remove NATO from Russian borders.
Trump can remove the coming conflict by giving Putin the mutual security agreement Russia has been requesting for years. This would be the costless solution, but Trump is not really in power, and the power and profit of the US military/security complex needs the Russian Enemy.
So, how will a devastating war be avoided? Information such as I have just presented is banned by the official narratives. The American foreign policy community avoids it like the plague.
-
Site: PaulCraigRoberts.org
The Camp of the Saints
Whites to become minority in UK in 40 years
The British government is destroying the British.
White people can’t afford to have children. They are taxed too heavily in order to support immigrant-invaders.
https://www.rt.com/news/618666-study-whites-to-become-minority-uk/
-
Site: PaulCraigRoberts.org
In Latvia if you watch Russian TV they put you in prison
https://www.rt.com/russia/618630-latvia-russian-tv-channels-arrest/
-
Site: PaulCraigRoberts.org
-
Site: AsiaNews.itThe discovery was made thanks to the work of the Rubber Research Institute of Sri Lanka (RRISL). The global problem affects plants by delaying the production of the nutrients they need, impacting latex output. With the disease, yields drop by up to 40 per cent. The problem could get worse in the future.
-
Site: Zero HedgeTrump Nominates Slew Of New Generals To Command Europe, Mideast & AfricaTyler Durden Fri, 06/06/2025 - 07:45
The Trump administration has just nominated a slew of new generals to head up top US military commands in the Middle East, Africa, and Europe.
Importantly, Air Force General Alex Grynkewich has been nominated as NATO’s new Supreme Allied Commander in Europe (SACEUR) and head of U.S. European Command (EUCOM).
Gen. Alexus Grynkewich, via CENTCOM
This comes amid reports that the US under the Trump administration is growing frustrated enough to 'step back' from NATO leadership, with lack of collective defense spending out of Europe.
For example, Defense News last month acknowledged, :The nomination to head European Command, which is not yet final, comes at a moment of uncertainty for America’s military commitment to Europe, potentially including cuts to U.S. forces on the continent and a lesser role in the NATO alliance."
Brussels is meanwhile pushing plans for NATO buildup plans in connection with a new spending goal, also at a moment Washington has told the UK that it should reach a target of 5% of GDP spending on defense, according to The Telegraph.
Grynkewich currently serves as Joint Staff Director for Operations and was formerly the top US Air Force commander in the Middle East, which means he oversaw the aerial response to CENTCOM's prior bombing raids against the Houthis of Yemen, as well as previously 'counter-ISIS' ops in northern Syria.
According to his official Air Force bio:
Lt. Gen. Grynkewich received his commission in 1993 after graduating from the U.S. Air Force Academy. He has served as an instructor pilot, weapons officer and operational test pilot in the F-16 Fighting Falcon and F-22 Raptor. Lt. Gen. Grynkewich has commanded at the squadron, wing and Air Expeditionary Task Force levels. His staff assignments include service at Air Combat Command, U.S. European Command, U.S. Central Command, Headquarters Air Force, and the Joint Staff. Prior to his current assignment, he served as the 9th Air Force (Air Forces Central), Shaw Air Force Base, South Carolina, and the Combined Forces Air Component Commander for U.S. Central Command, Southwest Asia.
President Trump also nominated Navy Vice Admiral Brad Cooper, currently CENTCOM’s deputy commander, to lead CENTCOM. Additionally, Dagvin Anderson, director for Joint Force Development, has been tapped to lead US Africa Command (AFRICOM).
The Pentagon announces U.S. Air Force Lieutenant General Alexus Grynkewich as NATO's new Supreme Allied Commander and head of U.S. European Command. pic.twitter.com/IIofVrs7W3
— Clash Report (@clashreport) June 5, 2025This fresh crop of commanders are likely being tapped for their loyalty to Trump's vision of 'make deals, not chaos' for the Middle East and Eastern Europe.
While there's no peace on the horizon as yet when it comes to Ukraine, Gaza, or Yemen - there's been noticeably quiet from the White House these past few days as both conflict theatres heat up. This could be a good thing, given Trump is not issuing threats, but could be patiently waiting for how Russia's retaliation on Ukraine - for example - plays out.
-
Site: Zero HedgeFutures Rise On Easing Trump-Musk Spat As Payrolls LoomTyler Durden Fri, 06/06/2025 - 07:26
S&P 500 futures rose 0.4% as Tesla shares rebounded 4% in premarket on signs that the spat between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk is cooling. Market gains had little conviction as traders brace for Friday’s main event: a pivotal payrolls report (full preview here) that’s likely to set the direction of travel for markets. Nasdaq futures also add 0.5% even as Broadcom shares fall 3% in premarket after giving a a lackluster revenue forecast for the current quarter. European stocks are little changed. Bond yields are 1-2bp lower; the USD is higher; the yen dropped after BBG reported that Bank of Japan officials are likely to discuss slowing their pullback from buying government bonds at a policy meeting later this month. Commodities are mostly higher: Gold climbs $6 to around $3,358/oz while silver tops $36/oz. WTI falls 0.6% to $63 a barrel. Bitcoin rises 3%. Macro headlines were largely muted overnight; All eyes on NFP today.
In premarket trading, Mag7 stocks are higher, led by Tesla, whose shares are set to rebound, rising 4.9% premarket, after plunging on Thursday as the feud between Elon Musk and President Donald Trump showed signs of de-escalation (Amazon +1%, Meta +0.8%, Apple +0.6%, Alphabet +0.6%, Nvidia +0.5%, Microsoft +0.4%).
- Broadcom (AVGO) dropped 3% after the company gave a lackluster revenue forecast for the current quarter, suggesting that the AI spending frenzy isn’t as strong as some investors anticipated. Lululemon added to the gloom after its latest earnings report highlighted the risk posed by new tariffs and exacerbated concerns about slowing growth.
- Docusign (DOCU) shares are down 18% after the e-signature software company gave a second-quarter billings outlook that is weaker than expected.
- Lululemon (LULU) shares plunge 21% after the upscale athletic clothing company cut its earnings per share forecast for the full year.
Markets are still reveberating from the spat between Trump and Musk in which Trump proposed cutting off the billionaire’s government contracts. Musk, who sparked the public feud by criticizing Trump’s signature tax bill, later signaled that he’s keen to dial down the hostility. White House aides have reportedly scheduled a call with the world’s richest person for Friday in an effort to cool things down. Their public back-and-forth triggered the most spectacular real-time destruction of wealth ever, with $34 billion erased from Musk’s net worth. Tesla shares are rebounding in premarket, after tanking 14% Thursday.
“Futures are edging higher, perhaps as Musk has started to suggest on X that he would be open to a cooling-off period in his war of words with the President,” said Jim Reid, global head of macro research and thematic strategy at Deutsche Bank AG.
Moves in other asset clases were more muted as traders awaited Friday’s nonfarm payrolls report for fresh insight on how the Trump administration’s trade war is affecting the economy. Turning to today's main event, economists see payrolls rising by 125,000 after job growth in March and April exceeded projections. The unemployment rate is seen holding at 4.2%. Weak payrolls data would be bad news for markets, with a big miss potentially sending stocks down 1.5%, according to Goldman Sachs traders (full preview here). A softening labor market would support expectations that the Federal Reserve will cut interest rates at least twice this year.
“Investors are getting used to all the noise and are looking at concrete matters like the jobs report or budget,” said Mabrouk Chetouane, head of global market strategy at Natixis Investment Managers. “There is a cooling trend in the labor market, which I expect will show this afternoon. That should further reinforce our call for two or three cuts from the Fed this year.”
Meanwhile, BofA’s Michael Hartnett is warning that global stocks are close to triggering sell signals as both fund inflows and market breadth are running too hot. The strategist said inflows to stocks and high-yield bonds have totaled 0.9% of AUM in the past four weeks. The sell signal will be set off if that exceeds 1%.
European equities are little changed as investors search for fresh catalysts on trade negotiations between the US and China and look ahead to a key US jobs report. The real estate and health care sectors outperform, while consumer shares are among the biggest laggards. Among individual movers, Adidas and Puma fall after Lululemon’s disappointing quarter fueled concerns over rising competition and tariffs. Here are the biggest European movers:
- Chemring gains for an 18th straight day, rising as much as 5.1% following an upgrade to buy at Berenberg which gives the UK defense firm a clean sweep of positive analyst ratings
- Galderma shares gain as much as 3.3%, to the highest level since February after Kepler Cheuvreux initiated coverage of the Swiss pure play dermatology group with a recommendation of buy and a new street high price target.
- Demant shares jump as much as 6.7% as the stock trades for the first time since being upgraded to buy at Citi.
- Huber + Suhner shares rise as much as 4.6% after Berenberg said the Swiss electrical products manufacturer is especially well-positioned for growth as it started coverage with a buy rating.
- Canal+ rises as much as 8.1%, reaching highest since mid December, after the media and entertainment company confirmed its full-year expectations and said it has reached an agreement with France’s cinema agency to settle a tax dispute.
- Recordati shares gain as much as 3.4% to a three-month high after JPMorgan lifted its price target on the stock, saying the Italian pharmaceutical company’s growth outlook is “strong and sustainable,” even before more M&A activity.
- Norwegian salmon stocks gaining after a broad cross-party agreement to delay any sweeping changes to the licensing system for several years, according to a statement from the parties after markets closed on Thursday.
- European athleisure stocks fall as US-listed Lululemon posted a second straight disappointing quarter, fueling concerns around the impact of rising competition and new tariffs.
- Allegro shares drop after two of its major holders — investment vehicles of Cinven and Permira Holdings, sold a 5.2% stake in the company.
- PostNL falls as much as 12.5% as Kepler Cheuvreux analyst Marc Zeck downgraded his recommendation from hold to reduce.
- Dassault Systemes shares decline as much as 2.5% after the company said it aims to double its non-IFRS diluted EPS by 2029, pushing out a more ambitious 2028 goal.
- Polish banking stocks fall after Szymon Holownia, the leader of junior coalition party Polska 2050, told Polsat News that he wants to include a windfall tax on lenders into a renegotiated coalition agreement.
Earlier in the session, Asian stocks traded in a tight range as a much-anticipated call between Donald Trump and China’s Xi Jinping offered little details on how trade negotiations would progress. The MSCI Asia Pacific Index was little changed. Indian stocks rose after the central bank cut interest rates more than projected and unexpectedly reduced the cash reserve ratio for banks. Gauges in Hong Kong fell, while those in Japan rebounded. Markets in Indonesia, Philippines and South Korea were closed for holidays.
In rates, treasuries edge higher ahead of the jobs report, with US 10-year yields falling nearly 2 bps to 3.37%. Bunds outperform their US peers, pushing German 10-year borrowing costs down 5 bps to 2.54%.
In FX, the Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index rises 0.2%. The Japanese yen and Swedish krona are the weakest G-10 currencies, falling 0.4% each. The euro dips 0.3% with little reaction seen after euro-area GDP was revised up for the first quarter. ECB policymakers largely stuck to Thursday’s messaging after they cut rates by a quarter point. USDJPY rose 0.4% to 144.08 after BBG reported that Bank of Japan officials are likely to discuss slowing their pullback from buying government bonds at a policy meeting later this month.
In commodities, gold climbs $6 to around $3,360/oz while silver tops $36/oz. WTI falls 0.6% to $63 a barrel. Bitcoin rises 3%.
Looking at today's calendar, the payrolls numbers are due at 8:30 a.m., while consumer credit data is due later in the day. The Fed’s Bowman is scheduled to give a speech on supervision and regulation.
Market Snapshot
- S&P 500 mini +0.5%
- Nasdaq 100 mini +0.5%
- Russell 2000 mini +0.6%
- Stoxx Europe 600 little changed
- DAX -0.2%, CAC 40 little changed
- 10-year Treasury yield -1 basis point at 4.38%
- VIX -0.3 points at 18.18
- Bloomberg Dollar Index +0.2% at 1210.26
- euro -0.3% at $1.1413
- WTI crude -0.5% at $63.03/barrel
Top Overnight News
- Elon Musk signaled he would move to cool tensions with US President Donald Trump, after differences between the two exploded Thursday into an all-out public feud.
- White House aides scheduled a call with Elon Musk today to take down the temperature after a public feud erupted with Donald Trump. Musk signaled he’s open to cooling tensions. Premarket, Tesla shares (+4.3%) pared some of yesterday’s plunge. Musk also backed off on a threat to decommission SpaceX’s Dragon spacecraft. BBG
- In the midst of the trade war and administration efforts to disentangle the U.S. and Chinese economies, US pharma companies have simultaneously supercharged their interest in China-based biotechs, announcing what are likely to be the biggest deals ever for the rights to experimental medicines invented by Chinese companies. Barron’s
- The US Treasury called on the BOJ to raise rates to strengthen the yen, making a remarkable policy recommendation in its semiannual currency report. Japan’s finance ministry said it doesn’t comment on the views of a foreign government. BBG
- Expectations in the market are intensifying that the Japanese government may adjust debt issuance as soon as next month by increasing sales of shorter maturity securities and trimming offerings of longer-dated ones to prevent a further rise in yields. BBG
- The European Central Bank is approaching the end of its interest-rate cuts, according to two Governing Council members, as others declared inflation has been vanquished.
- The Reserve Bank of India cut its key policy rate on Friday by an unexpectedly sharp 50 bps to 5.5%, its lowest level in nearly three years, as tepid inflation allowed the bank to focus on spurring economic growth. Nikkei
- Iran orders thousands of tons of ballistic missile material from China as Tehran looks to rebuild its arsenal and provide more weapons to proxies in the Middle East. WSJ
- We estimate nonfarm payrolls rose by 110k in May, below consensus of 125k and the three-month average of +155k. On the positive side, big data indicators suggested a healthy pace of job creation. On the negative side, trade policy uncertainty was very high across the survey period and we expect another 10k decline in federal government payrolls from workforce reductions. GIR
- The ECB is approaching the end of its interest-rate cycle, Madis Muller said. Fellow Governing Council member Yannis Stournaras told BTV that the bank should take a break to give officials a chance to assess recent shocks. BBG
- Trump told Senate Republicans he’s open to a SALT cap below the $40,000 in the House-passed tax bill. BBG
Tariffs/Trade
- German Chancellor Merz said Europe is looking for more independence from China and tariffs are having a "terrible" impact on German automakers, while the Chancellery and White House agreed to even closer cooperation on trade talks, according to CNN. Merz also commented that US tariffs are threatening our economy and we are looking for ways to bring them down, according to a Fox News interview. German Chancellor Merz said this US admin is open for discussions, and hearing other opinions; no doubts US will stick with NATO
- Canadian PM Carney spoke with Chinese Premier Li Qiang and exchanged views on bilateral relations, while they emphasised the importance of engagement and both leaders agreed to regularise communication channels between Canada and China. Furthermore, they also discussed trade between the two nations and Carney’s office stated that both governments committed to collaborating on addressing the fentanyl crisis.
- Chinese Premier Li held talks with Canadian PM Carney, according to Xinhua; China willing to safeguard multilaterals and free trade with Canada. There is 'great potential' for cooperation between China & Canada. Both should strengthen cooperation in clean energy, climate change, and innovation.
- Japan's government said trade negotiator Akazawa met with US Commerce Secretary Lutnick and Akazawa strongly sought a review of US tariffs, while they discussed non-tariff barriers and trade expansion.
A more detailed look at global markets courtesy of Newsquawk
APAC stocks traded mixed following the subdued handover from the US where a stunning online bust-up between US President Trump and Elon Musk overshadowed the recent call between President Trump and Chinese President Xi in which the leaders agreed to start a new round of talks ASAP. ASX 200 saw two-way, rangebound trade as outperformance in the energy and utilities sectors was counterbalanced by losses in gold miners and the top-weighted financial industry, while a lack of pertinent data releases also contributed to the uneventful picture. Nikkei 225 gained with the index supported by recent currency weakness although further upside was capped following disappointing Household Spending data which showed a steeper-than-feared M/M decline and a surprise Y/Y contraction. Hang Seng and Shanghai Comp were indecisive despite the recent phone call between US President Trump and Chinese President Xi which the White House had been touting throughout the week, while Xi reiterated calls for the US to handle the Taiwan issue with caution.
Top Asian News
- RBI cut the Repurchase Rate by 50bps to 5.50% (exp. 25bps cut) and changed its stance to neutral from accommodative, while it cut the Standing Deposit Facility Rate and Marginal Standing Facility Rate by 50bps each to 5.25% and 5.75%, respectively. RBI Governor Malhotra said growth remains lower than aspirations and it is important to stimulate growth, as well as noted that front-loading rate cuts to support growth was felt necessary. Malhotra also stated that inflation has softened significantly over the last six months and inflation is likely to undershoot the full-year target at the margin, while he noted that monetary policy has limited space left to support growth and they retained the FY26 Real GDP growth forecast at 6.5%. Furthermore, the RBI Governor announced to cut the Cash Reserve Ratio by 100bps in four equal tranches, which will release INR 2.5tln, as well as noted that they will continue to monitor and take measures as necessary and that the CRR cut is to reduce the cost of funding of banks and help accelerate policy transmission.
- PBoC set USD/CNY mid-point at 7.1845 vs exp. 7.1935 (Prev. 7.1865).
- Japan's former top FX diplomat says narrowing US-Japan rate gap will likely support the yen at around 135-140 against USD by year-end.
European bourses - Flat/lower trade across Europe following the fallout of the dramatic Trump-Musk spat, but with traders setting their sights on the US jobs report due 13:30 BST/08:30 EDT. On the week, futures of the broad Stoxx 600 and Euro Stoxx 50 indices are currently poised for a second week of gains, though not by much at this stage, and will depend on how the aforementioned data comes in. European sectors - Sectors display a mixed picture with the breadth of the market also narrow, with no real bias. Top gainers at the time of writing include Health Care (+0.6%), Energy (+0.5%), and Retail (+0.3%); losers include Basic Resources (-0.9%), Industrial Goods and Services (-0.4%), and Media (-0.3%). European movers - HSBC (+0.3%) chairman Mark Tucker will step down on September 30th. Adidas (-1.3%), JD Sports (-0.5%), and Puma (-1.6%) are all slipping after US apparel maker Lululemon (LULU) saw its shares tumble by over 20% in extended trading. Airbus (-0.9%) confirmed that it delivered 51 jets in May (-4% Y/Y),
Top European News
- UK government unveiled new concessions to private equity firms regarding its tax break crackdown in which it proposed changes to tax treatment of carried interest that will make the regime less onerous, according to FT.
- ECB's Holzmann says "I dissented" at the rate decision on Thursday (as expected)Lowering rates at a time of high savings and low investments ha no effect except a monetary effectCurrently expansive in monetary policyLagarde said we are at the end of the cycle, wanted to discuss whether that is the caseCurrent nominal neutral rate is around 3%
- ECB's Muller said ECB can be happy with inflation where it is; and he agrees with ECB President Lagarde that cycle almost finished. Hard to say what's coming next on rates.
- ECB's Villeroy said the ECB has won the battle against inflation in Europe, and we will not again see the low rates we saw a few years ago, and added that French inflation is now under control but debt remains a serious issue, "France cannot continue like this", according to Bloomberg.
- ECB's Simkus said interest rates are now at neutral; its important to keep full flexibility, according to Reuters. Stournaras said the best thing for the ECB is to wait and see, ECB rate cutting is nearly done, ECB has achieved a soft landing, and ECB may cut if the economy weakens and inflation falls. Stournaras noted of downside risks to growth, and the bank is "quite" confident in its forecasts, and said he's afraid the Dollar may lose some of its status.
- Bundesbank semi-annual report: German recovery delayed further; economy to tread water in 2025; German GDP to stagnate in 2025, grow by 0.7% in 2026. Increased defence, infrastructure spending to significantly increase growth by the end of 2027. German exports will decline significantly in 2025, increase only slightly next year.
- Italian Stats Bureau ISTAT cut Italy's 2025 GDP growth to 0.6% from 0.8% forecast in December.
- SNB noted that it does not engage in any manipulation of the CHF; does not seek to prevent adjustments in the balance of trade or to gain unfair competitive advantages for the Swiss economy. In addition, the use of FX market interventions may be necessary under certain circumstances to ensure appropriate monetary conditions. SNB monetary policy is geared towards the needs of Switzerland.
FX
- USD - USD is slightly firmer in what has ultimately been a week of losses for DXY. Attention now is firmly fixated on today's NFP report which is set to see payroll growth slow to 130k from 177k and unemployment rate hold steady @ 4.2%. As it stands, the next 25bps cut is not fully priced until September with 54bps of loosening seen by year-end. DXY is towards the top end of yesterday's 98.35-98.94 range.
- EUR - EUR is trivially softer vs. the USD after gaining yesterday on account of the ECB rate decision which saw policymakers pull the trigger on a 25bps rate cut, whilst noting that policy is "well-positioned"; suggesting that the ECB could be nearing or at the end of its cutting cycle. ECB speak this morning hasn't shifted the dial with policymakers signalling flexibility going forward, whilst acknowledging progress on inflation. EUR/USD is contained within yesterday's 1.1404-1.1495 range.
- JPY - JPY is the laggard across the majors following disappointing Household Spending data. Subsequently, USD/JPY briefly made its way back onto a 144 handle with a current session peak @ 144.13, stopping shy of the WTD high @ 144.39. On the trade front, Japan's government said trade negotiator Akazawa met with US Commerce Secretary Lutnick and Akazawa strongly sought a review of US tariffs. Elsewhere, Japan's former top FX diplomat says narrowing US-Japan rate gap will likely support the yen at around 135-140 against USD by year-end.
- GBP - GBP is softer vs. the broadly firmer USD with UK-specific newsflow on the light side ahead of next week's UK spending review. On which, UK Chancellor Reeves reaffirmed she will not have a UK budget like October's again, but can't rule out any tax changes over the next four years. For today's agenda, BoE Chief Economist Pill is due to speak @ 13:00BST, but given the subject matter of "AI and Households", it is unclear how much he will touch on monetary policy. After printing a multi-year high yesterday @ 1.3616, Cable has since retreated and moved back below the 1.3550 mark.
- Antipodeans - Antipodeans are steady vs. the USD following a light data docket and relevant newsflow overnight. Both continue to keep an eye on US-Sino relations following the Xi-Trump call yesterday given their trade exposure. However, the readout had little follow-through into either currency. AUD/USD has moved back onto a 0.64 handle and pulled back from yesterday's YTD peak @ 0.6538. NZD/USD has also retreated from yesterday's YTD high @ 0.6080 but is still holding above the 0.60 mark.
- NBP's Litwiniuk said they need to be cautious regarding the disinflation path; MPC can return to the subject of cuts in July or September; rates can still be cut by 100-125bps this year.
Treasuries
- USTs - USTs are a touch higher ahead of the US jobs report and following yesterday's ECB-led losses which outmuscled a spike higher in weekly claims metrics. As it stands, the next 25bps cut is not fully priced until September with 54bps of loosening seen by year-end. Sep'25 USTs are currently within yesterday's 110.23+ to 111.14+ range. From a yield perspective, the US curve is fractionally in bull flattening mode, whilst the 10yr yield has moved back to the 4.37% after venturing as low as 4.318% yesterday.
- Bunds - Bunds are attempting to atone for yesterday's losses which were seen in the wake of the ECB rate decision. Sep'25 Bunds have been as high as 130.72 but are still some way away from yesterday's peak @ 131.47. The 10yr yield is back below the 2.55% mark after climbing as high as 2.581% yesterday.
- Gilts - Gilts are currently being led by the upside in German paper as UK-specific newsflow remains light ahead of next week's UK spending review. Sep'25 Gilts have been as high as 92.31 but still have some ground to cover before approaching yesterday's best @ 92.63. The 10yr yield currently sits just above the 4.6% mark and within yesterday's 4.557-4.648% range.
Commodities
- Crude Futures - Subdued trade amid a firmer Dollar and overall cautious risk tone heading into the US jobs report before the weekend. Contracts saw a leg lower likely on technicals as WTI dipped under USD 63.00/bbl at the same time as Brent fell under USD 65.00/bbl, although prices thereafter stabilised. News flow has been light for the complex, with nothing major to report in geopolitics either.
- Precious Metals - Spot gold and silver are largely treading water amid a lack of catalysts during the European morning in the run-up to the US jobs report. Spot gold currently resides in a current USD 3,351.49-3,375.29/oz range, well within yesterday's USD 3,338.29-3,403.15/oz parameter.
- Base Metals - Mixed trade across base metals, in fitting with the cautious risk tone ahead of the US jobs report, with the Trump-Xi phone call doing little to keep broader prices underpinned during this session. 3M LME copper dipped back under USD 9,700/t to trade in a USD 9,659.00-9,768.00/t range at the time of writing. Dalian iron ore futures rose to a one-week peak overnight with traders citing strong Chinese demand coupled with some optimism following the Trump-Xi call, with the front-month contract ending daytime trade +0.9%.
- HSBC expects OPEC+ to accelerate supply hikes in August and September; weaker fundamentals after the summer, raise downside risks to the Bank's USD 65/bbl brent forecast from Q425.
- LME has intervened to make Mercuria roll its "huge" position in aluminium, according to Bloomberg.
- India's Mines Minister said exploring critical mineral assets in Australia, Argentina and Chile.
- EU Ags Commissioner said EU-Ukraine trade has reverted to conditions of pre-war trade deal, after the expiry of wartime exemptions; could conclude a longer-term trade arrangement by summer. New EU-Ukraine trade arrangement will be in between the quotas under pre-war trade deal and war-time exemptions
Geopolitics: Middle East
- Israel assured the US it won't strike Iran unless talks fail, according to Axios.
- Iran is said to have ordered material from China that could make hundreds of ballistic missiles, according to Wall Street Journal.
- "Lebanese Army: Israel's continued violation of the agreement may push us to freeze cooperation with the monitoring committee regarding site inspection", via Al Hadath.
Geopolitics: Ukraine
- Ukraine said Russia launched a drone and missile attack with explosions and air defence activity heard over Kyiv.
- Russian Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Ryabkov said returning to the arms control agreement with the US is becoming less and less realistic amid the US' Golden Dome project.
- EU is weighing adding Russia to its money laundering 'grey list', according to FT.
- French Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs hopes the European Commission will put new Russian sanctions package before the end of June, according to Reuters.
US Event Calendar
- 8:30 am: May Change in Nonfarm Payrolls, est. 126k, prior 177k
- 8:30 am: May Change in Private Payrolls, est. 120k, prior 167k
- 8:30 am: May Change in Manufact. Payrolls, est. -4.5k, prior -1k
- 8:30 am: May Unemployment Rate, est. 4.2%, prior 4.2%
- 8:30 am: May Average Hourly Earnings MoM, est. 0.3%, prior 0.2%
- 8:30 am: May Average Hourly Earnings YoY, est. 3.7%, prior 3.8%
- 3:00 pm: Apr Consumer Credit, est. 10b, prior 10.17b
Central Banks
- 10:00 am: Fed’s Bowman Gives Speech on Supervision, Regulation
DB's Jim Reid concludes the overnight wrap
Markets had a volatile session yesterday, as they grappled with a barrage of news that each pushed in different directions. Those included positive US-China headlines amid a call between Trump and Xi, a hawkish ECB decision and more weak data from the US. But the most remarkable was an extraordinary war of words between Trump and Elon Musk that ultimately left risks assets losing ground. Tesla’s shares plunged by -14.26%, while the S&P 500 fell -0.53% despite earlier briefly moving into technical bull market territory as it climbed just over +20% since its recent low on April 8.
The dramatic feud between the US President and the world’s richest man emerged after Trump said during a meeting with Germany’s chancellor Merz that he was “disappointed” and “surprised” in Musk’s recent criticism of the Republicans’ budget bill, with Musk responding on X by suggesting that Trump would have lost the election without his support. The war of words then escalated on social media, with Trump posting that “The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon’s Governmental Subsidies and Contracts”, while Musk posted that Trump’s tariffs “will cause a recession in the second half of this year” and responded “yes” to a suggestion that Trump should be impeached.
Following the Trump-Musk spat, Tesla’s shares slumped -14.26%, which together with a -3.55% decline on Wednesday marked its worst two-day decline (-17.30%) since 2020. The feud also weighed on US risk assets more broadly, with the S&P 500 (-0.53%) seeing ten of its eleven sector groups move lower on the day. Meanwhile, the VIX volatility index rose +0.87pts to 18.48, having been earlier on course to fall to its lowest level since late March. The tech mood has stayed subdued overnight as Broadcom’s results delivered a lackluster revenue forecast. The chipmaker, which is now the 7th largest company in the S&P 500 and around $300bn of market cap ahead of Tesla, saw its shares slide by more than -4% after-hours. However S&P 500 (+0.25%) and NASDAQ 100 (+0.14%) futures are edging higher, perhaps as Musk has started to suggest on X that he would be open to a cooling-off period in his war of words with the President.
Earlier on in the session we had seen a clear risk-on move on both sides of the Atlantic as a surprise Trump-Xi call raised the prospect of fresh US-China talks, leading to growing optimism that trade tensions would ease. The news of a call by Chinese state media led to an immediate jump in US equity futures. Shortly after, the rally got a further boost after Trump posted that it was “a very good phone call” which “resulted in a very positive conclusion for both Countries.” In the post, it said that their respective teams would soon meet, and also that “There should no longer be any questions respecting the complexity of Rare Earth products.” So that helped to boost market optimism, particularly after Trump had posted the previous day that Xi was “VERY TOUGH, AND EXTREMELY HARD TO MAKE A DEAL WITH!!!”.
The trade headlines outweighed an initial negative reaction to the latest weekly US jobless claims, which added to fears that the US labour market was finally deteriorating after Liberation Day. Initial jobless claims (one of the most timely indicators we get) moved up to 247k in the week ending May 31 (vs. 235k expected), reaching their highest level since October. Moreover, that followed the very soft ADP report the previous day, which had private payrolls up by just +37k in May. The one caveat to the claims data is that seasonals tend to boost the number a bit at this time of the year. However it’s not the only evidence of a slightly weakening labour market. So that’s really heightened the focus on today’s jobs report for May, as any softness there would really magnify those fears. In terms of what to expect, our US economists forecast nonfarm payrolls to come in at +125k, dipping down from the +177k in March, with the unemployment rate remaining at 4.2%.
Those competing factors drove a big turnaround for US Treasuries yesterday. They initially fell back, with the 10yr yield hitting an intraday low of 4.31% just after the claims data. But the hawkish ECB decision and the Trump-Xi call led to a significant turnaround, with the 10yr yield ultimately closing up +3.7bps at 4.39%. The moves were even larger at the front-end of the curve, with the 2yr yield up +5.4bps to 3.92% as investors dialled back the likelihood of Fed rate cuts.
Meanwhile in Europe, the ECB was the biggest market driver yesterday. They cut rates by 25bps as expected, taking the deposit rate down to 2%. But significantly, President Lagarde signalled that they had “nearly concluded” the easing cycle, suggesting that policy rates weren’t likely to go much lower from here. She also signalled little urgency to cut rates, saying that the current level left them “in a good position to navigate the uncertain conditions that will be coming up.” As such, the ECB appears to be saying that it may have now reached the appropriate level of rates, a stronger message than a soft signal of a pause our European economists had expected. That said, our economists see expected soft growth in H2 and more significant disinflation than projected by the ECB as still favouring some further easing. See their full reaction here.Lagarde’s comments immediately drove a clear market reaction, with another 25bp ECB cut now being less than fully priced, the 2yr German yield surging +7.8bps on the day and the euro itself strengthening +0.25%. Several other details also fed into the hawkish narrative, with the policy statement saying that although trade uncertainty would be a short-term drag, “rising government investment in defence and infrastructure will increasingly support growth over the medium term.” Later in the day, Bloomberg also reported that ECB officials thought a pause at the next meeting in July was the most likely scenario, with mixed views on whether another rate cut was likely after that. By the close, yields on 10yr bunds (+5.2bps), OATs (+4.7bps) and BTPs (+3.5bps) had all moved higher. Otherwise, equities ended the day higher with the STOXX 600 up +0.16%, but that was mainly thanks to the Trump-Xi call, as the index had been in negative territory after the hawkish ECB news.
In Asia markets are relatively subdued this morning. The Nikkei (+0.24%) has risen a little on weak Japanese economic data that might delay further rate hikes by the BOJ (more below). Meanwhile, the CSI (-0.12%) and the Shanghai Composite (-0.06%) are struggling to gain traction while the Hang Seng (-0.21%) and the S&P/ASX 200 (-0.19%) are seeing minor losses.
Coming back to Japan household spending (-0.1% y/y) unexpectedly fell in April, attributed to consumers curbing spending due to rising prices. This contrasted sharply with market expectations of a +1.5% gain following the previous month's +2.1% increase.
Elsewhere yesterday, data showed the US trade deficit narrowed sharply to $61.6bn in April, reflecting the impact of the new tariffs. That was the smallest monthly deficit since September 2023, and a huge decline from the prior month's $138.3bn trade deficit. Given that lower imports mechanically add to GDP, this is expected to lead to a strong bounceback in GDP for Q2 after the Q1 contraction. Indeed, the Atlanta Fed’s latest GDPNow estimate is pointing to annualised growth of +3.8% in Q2.
To the day ahead now, and the main highlight will be the US jobs report for May. Over in Europe, there’s also Euro Area retail sales for April, and German and French industrial production for April. Otherwise, central bank speakers include ECB President Lagarde, and the ECB’s Holzmann, Simkus and Centeno.
-
Site: Zero HedgeDo We Really Need Home Robots?Tyler Durden Fri, 06/06/2025 - 07:20
Authored by Jeffrey Tucker via The Epoch Times,
Maybe there was a time—when I was a kid watching “The Jetsons”—when I fantasized about a walking, talking, productive robot in my house. It would do the laundry, the cooking, the cleaning, answer the door, walk the dog, dress the kids, make the bed, and so on.
Many companies, most notably Tesla, are working on this now. We see the prototypes all over social media. Artificial intelligence (AI) language models have made their speech very impressive. Their movements are looking ever more natural. They do seem to be on the way, and Elon Musk says they will be the biggest consumer product in history.
These days, I’m not so sure. In fact, the prospect seems absurd to me, destined to make our lives worse not better. Do we really need fewer routines and more excuses to sit and stare at our computers while machines do even more work for us?
Count me among the skeptics. We have been replacing household routines with machines for a century. Some have merit because the manual way is too arduous. I would rather have a vacuum cleaner than beat out rugs, even if the latter method is better in the long run. Same with dishwashers and washing machines. I get that they save time.
But there comes a point when it is all too much. The trigger for me was the “smart” lightbulb. That’s where I drew the line. I would rather stand up and turn it off and on than become nothing but a couch potato with a smartphone. There are reasons perhaps for the ability to remotely manage household temperature, but if I were building today, I would look long and hard for analog over digital thermostats.
After my decision to reject smart bulbs, I started de-digitizing my domestic space. No more home assistants. I can stand up and turn the volume on the speaker up and down with my fingers. I can look through a hole in the door to see who is there. I can walk to the car and turn it on. And so on. I also appreciate not being surrounded by tools of surveillance.
As this process unfolded, I began to realize something culturally insidious about all of these new technologies. They all teach us to regret however it is we are using our time except and to the extent we are frittering away our lives on digital devices. They teach us that everything else we are doing is a waste of time.
We are encouraged always to get things done faster and with ever less effort. Whatever we are doing is regrettable. Adopting a new tech means saving time and energy. But ask yourself: For what are we actually saving this time and energy? Very likely it is something else that you are supposed to regret.
This becomes a major attitude problem. It creates a culture of grumbling and discontent. That attitude invades our hearts and souls, so eventually the normal stream of life itself becomes nothing other than a big pain in the neck. This then fuels the consumer demand for ever more products that promise to do everything for us.
How many actual skills are we losing along the way? Plenty.
Quick story about how I had wax melted all over a linen cloth. I had no idea what to do about it. So I looked it up on Grok. The suggestion came in two parts. First, freeze the cloth and scrape off the excess with a credit card. Second, iron it with a hot iron with a brown bag or newspaper between the iron and cloth.
I did it and was utterly astounded. It worked like a dream.
I thought, “Thank goodness for AI for teaching me this amazing trick.”
But in talking with others about it, it turns out that this is not some great secret. This is how people have been removing wax from cloth for centuries.
Apparently, our grandfathers all knew this. But for me, I somehow missed out on that lesson. Now it can be part of my routines.
One wonders how much other knowledge is being lost as we turn over more and more parts of our lives to AI and robots. There is a genuine danger here of intellectual and spiritual atrophy. We should think about this carefully before we plunge full-on into a machine-run world.
Every new technology brings benefits, but also costs. Musical skill is evaporating in the home, for example, and has for decades. Most young people today have no idea how to iron. When inflation hit restaurants so hard a few years ago, many people had to learn how to cook for the first time.
Most people have no clue about how clothing comes to be washed without a machine and would not even know how to begin cleaning a pair of socks by soaking them in hot water. Instead, we think the machines do some mysterious magic inside a rumbling box.
This is not a case against streaming music or washing machines but only a heads-up that they come at the cost of our own capacity to manage our lives in their absence. We become less useful as human beings. That surely must be recognized as something to regret, even if only a bit.
We should be more aware of the way the product market thrives off feeding our disgruntlement. It’s not evil, and that’s the market at work. There’s always going to be a better mousetrap.
But we should still be aware of the effect on our lives and attitudes. There is merit and joy in simple routines such as cleaning, cooking, folding, walking the dog, standing up from time to time and doing things, and even gardening and hard work.
If we come to think of all these things as pointless expenditures of time and energy, better done by a machine, a major swath of our lives becomes nothing but drudgery.
This is all about the attitude we bring to routine tasks. If we go into them with a sense that someone or something else should be doing them, we have a downcast mind, do a sloppy job, and let our brains be invaded by all kinds of negative energy.
If you look at the same task as an opportunity to be scrupulous, to be useful, to achieve something with one’s own hands, to better our little part of the world, and to take pride in what we have done, the opposite happens. Our blues turn to joy, gradually over time.
As I’ve written, this is how farmers think. They rise early to feed the chickens, repair the fences, fix the water well, brush the horses, or whatever else, not with a sense that all of this is terrible but rather that this is how life is, its very essence. It is all about using one’s own energy to exercise some controlling and civilizing cooperative relationship with the natural world around us.
Most of us are not farmers, but we can adopt the same patience, persistence, and joy that they have, even if we are dealing with urban commutes, buying groceries, or keeping our homes and spaces clean and orderly. Or gardening. We don’t need robots for this. We can do this with our own hands.
Again, what precisely are we preparing to do with the time we supposedly save with all this automation and rushing around? If you think about it, you are probably merely doing something else that you are regretting just as much as the previous thing. Honestly, this is no way to live.
It’s all about the attitude we bring to the conduct of daily life. If we listen to the constant screams that our lives are miserable—that it is darn near slavery to fold clothes and do dishes—so we need robots to do things for us, the result will be sadness all around instead of a constant sense of achievement.
Maybe there is a role for these machines for the sick and infirm, just like autonomous driving can be a dream for those in no position to drive themselves. But as usual with new products, we have a tendency to wildly exaggerate their merits, believing that they will take away all the demons that surround us. When that doesn’t work, we turn to substances.
Buy a robot if you must, but it is just as crucial to learn and do so-called menial tasks with joy, if only to remind ourselves of the high place of the human person—ourselves—in the unfolding of our lives. Maybe we should stop spending money on toys that encourage us to believe that we are ever less useful as human beings.
Every new technology in the 21st century seems to go in the same direction: overpromised results, wild enthusiasm, roaring stock markets, release, disappointment, and finally reality. Remember the way we were all going to wear headsets and live in the Metaverse? That did not happen.
Similarly on robots for domestic use. I’m bearish. My intuition is that society has already seen peak techno-utopia and is now ready for a return to the physical world with all its beautiful routines, the mastery of which requires human hands.
Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times or ZeroHedge.
-
Site: Mises InstituteAs a bookend to last week‘s critical article on Thomistic Aristotelianism of Alasdair MacIntyre, Dr. David Gordon in Friday Philosophy scrutinizes the libertarian-tolerant philosopher Henry B. Veatch. Dr. Gordon finds Veatch‘s arguments much more tolerable.
-
Site: Novus Motus LiturgicusPfarrkirche Lunz am See: Lunz Parish Church, AustriaThere is a special joy in seeing something that one has only read about for years. I experienced this joy in Lunz am See, Austria, last week. This tiny town in Lower Austria, not far from the crystal-clear lake of Lunzersee, has a quaint parish church that was built around 1502. It is described both as a Marienkirche (a church dedicated to the Michael P. Foleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02649905848645336033noreply@blogger.com0
-
Site: Zero HedgeJapan's iSpace Spacecraft Crashes On Moon, Shares Crater Back On EarthTyler Durden Fri, 06/06/2025 - 06:55
Tokyo-based ispace Inc.'s second uncrewed lunar landing attempt ended in failure on Friday, as its Resilience lander crashed during the final descent phase. The lunar mishap marks another setback for the Japanese firm.
"As of 8:00 a.m. on June 6, 2025, mission controllers have determined that it is unlikely that communication with the lander will be restored and therefore completing Success 9 is not achievable. It has been decided to conclude the mission," ispace wrote on X.
As of 8:00 a.m. on June 6, 2025, mission controllers have determined that it is unlikely that communication with the lander will be restored and therefore completing Success 9 is not achievable. It has been decided to conclude the mission.
— ispace (@ispace_inc) June 6, 2025
“Given that there is currently no… pic.twitter.com/IoRUfggoiQThe mission, which was positioned as a pivotal moment for Japan's entry into lunar exploration and a cornerstone for its commercial space ambitions, has sidelined moon missions from the company for now. The loss follows a failed 2023 mission due to a software error.
Meanwhile, Texas-based rivals Intuitive Machines Inc. and Firefly Aerospace Inc. have already achieved lunar landings. Firefly became the first private company to successfully land a functioning spacecraft on the moon in March, while Intuitive Machines managed a hard touchdown—but its lander lost functionality just hours later.
Ispace provided color on the sequence of events that led to the failed landing:
ispace engineers at the HAKUTO-R Mission Control Center in Nihonbashi, Tokyo, transmitted commands to execute the landing sequence at 3:13 a.m. on June 6, 2025. The RESILIENCE lander then began the descent phase. The lander descended from an altitude of approximately 100 km to approximately 20 km, and then successfully fired its main engine as planned to begin deceleration. While the lander's attitude was confirmed to be nearly vertical, telemetry was lost thereafter, and no data indicating a successful landing was received, even after the scheduled landing time had passed.
Based on the currently available data, the Mission Control Center has been able to confirm the following: The laser rangefinder used to measure the distance to the lunar surface experienced delays in obtaining valid measurement values. As a result, the lander was unable to decelerate sufficiently to reach the required speed for the planned lunar landing. Based on these circumstances, it is currently assumed that the lander likely performed a hard landing on the lunar surface.
After communication with the lander was lost, a command was sent to reboot the lander, but communication was unable to be re-established.
In markets, iSpace shares in Tokyo crashed on Friday, closing down nearly 29%... What goes up must come down.
Earlier, Ispace CEO Takeshi Hakamada held a news conference following news of the failed landing attempt. He compared iSpace to SpaceX: "SpaceX has also failed several times, but now SpaceX occupies the launching market."
Ispace CFO Jumpei Nozaki recently told CNN that the company has already secured funds for a third attempt at landing a craft on the lunar surface.
-
Site: Zero HedgeDoug Casey On Silver: Money, Markets, & The Metal's Role In The Coming Chaos
International Man: What is it about silver that makes it viable as a monetary metal—that is, something people actually use to store and exchange value?
Doug Casey: Let’s look at the definition of what makes a good money. There are basically six characteristics. A good money has to be durable, divisible, convenient, consistent, have use value, and some limit on supply. Using those six key characteristics, gold ranks first, silver second, and copper third. That’s why those three metals have been preferred money throughout history. They were superior to seashells, salt, cows, paper, and other commodities. In today’s world it makes sense to bring Bitcoin, which also satisfies those six characteristics into the mix.
So, to answer the question: Silver has always been a monetary metal, and it likely always will be.
International Man: Do you think gold functions better as money than silver—and if so, why? If not, why not?
Doug Casey: Gold is much scarcer than silver. It has an extremely high unit value. And its value relative to silver has increased throughout history. In the days of Ancient Egypt, gold traded at only three times the value of silver. In Rome, at the time of Caesar, the gold aureus was worth about 12 times more than the silver denarius. The US initially fixed the value of gold against silver at 17.5 to 1. Incidentally, fixing the value of any commodities—which fluctuate widely for many reasons—is always a bad idea. As of now, the ratio is about 100 to 1. The increase in gold’s value relative to silver is a trend that, with fits and starts, has been in motion for over 3,000 years.
It’s important to have an adequate quantity of money available for use in commerce. This was a problem in the early days of the US, when there was neither enough gold nor silver in circulation. Of course, the terms “adequate” and “enough” are rather arbitrary. That’s one reason why money itself should be strictly a function of the free market, not government. If there’s not “enough” gold or silver, more will be mined at a profit. When there’s too much, mining becomes unprofitable, and stops. Unlike government money, free market money is self-regulating.
Out of maybe 7 billion ounces of gold that have ever been mined, almost all is stored in vaults, safe deposit boxes, or worn as jewelry. Most is owned by governments and their central banks. It doesn’t circulate in any meaningful way.
Governments—including the US government—used to hold large amounts of silver in storage too. But now none do.
International Man: The long-term trend has been for silver to be demonetized and increasingly treated as an industrial metal. Do you see that continuing, and what are the implications?
Doug Casey: Let’s look at silver as an element. In the past, it was only used as jewelry. But out of the 92 elements, it’s the most reflective and the most conductive of both heat and electricity. There’s every reason to believe that silver is going to gain many more industrial uses over time because of these properties. It’s a high-tech metal.
A great deal of silver used to be consumed in photography and X-rays, until a generation ago, but it’s hardly used there at all anymore. Digital photography has nearly replaced it.
About 850 million ounces of silver are mined every year, and about another 150 million ounces are recycled. The available supply of bullion, therefore, is about a billion ounces—versus about 100 million ounces of gold. That’s roughly a ten-to-one ratio on the supply side, although most of the silver is “consumed,” whereas almost all the gold is added to inventory. Since 2019, silver has been in deficit. Roughly 150 million ounces a year have been taken from various stockpiles. That explains why its price has risen to a new base level in the $30 to $35 range, and done better than gold, percentage-wise.
And while we’re talking about silver’s unique qualities, it’s worth mentioning that gold also has unique metallic properties. It’s the most non-reactive of all metals; gold doesn’t oxidize. It’s the most ductile, meaning it can be drawn into the thinnest wire of any metal. It’s the most malleable, meaning it can be beaten into the thinnest sheet of all metals.
When people talk about gold and silver, they often treat them as if they were one metal. While they do share a lot of characteristics, they each have unique qualities. You’ll notice that, on the Periodic Table of Elements, copper (with 29 protons) is at the top of the file, above silver (with 47), and gold (79). The three metals are closely related atomically, as well as by their traditional use as money.
International Man: During times of monetary chaos and runaway inflation, people tend to rush into traditional forms of money—assets that hold value better than rapidly depreciating government paper.
Silver often sees a surge in demand during these moments, despite its limited monetary role today.
Do you see something like that happening again?
Doug Casey: I don’t think there’s any doubt that we’re heading into a massive monetary crisis. The dollar is going to lose value at an accelerating rate because of the US government’s profligate spending policies.
DOGE, which was an excellent idea, has failed; the deficits are going to rise from $2 trillion to $3 trillion. And when the economy takes a downward turn, the government’s tax revenues will fall, even while its obligations rise. I expect that within the next five years, we’ll see $5 to $6 trillion annual deficits.
That’s why bonds are in a world of trouble, for reasons we’ve discussed in the past. The stock market is grossly overpriced. Real estate is also in bubble territory, with large carrying costs aggravating the problem. The average guy is likely to rediscover gold, and especially silver.
International Man: Where do you see silver prices heading, and what do you think are the best ways to speculate on a rise?
Doug Casey: Both gold and silver are in major bull markets. Silver is the poor man’s gold. The average guy, who can’t lay his hands on $500 cash if he needs it, really can’t afford gold. But when he gets scared enough about what’s going on, silver will still be relatively affordable. The average guy will start accumulating silver as a place to hide.
I’ve accumulated silver for many years, just like gold. I’ve only bought it, never sold it. The problem with silver is that its unit value is so low, you’d need a vault like Uncle Scrooge to store a substantial amount. That’s not true with gold.
That said, everybody should have 100 ounces of silver coins. If you can, set aside a few thousand ounces as a savings vehicle. If the US government succeeds in destroying the dollar, many people are likely to prefer being paid, and buying and selling, with gold and silver coins. They’ll want something real and tangible, not a digital abstraction, or pieces of paper.
It really doesn’t matter how high the price of silver goes from a supply point of view. That’s because almost all new silver is a byproduct of mining other metals—gold, copper, lead, and zinc. To major mining companies, silver is only a nice bonus. Even at $100 it won’t have a material effect on their production plans.
Years ago, there was a Spokane Stock Exchange. It closed in 1991. Most people are unaware the US used to have a number of regional stock exchanges—Denver for oil, Salt Lake for uranium, and so forth. Scores of small silver stocks were traded in Spokane. From about 1960 to 1970, those little penny stocks went up by orders of magnitude. The boom was chronicled in a book called “Small Fortunes in Penny Gold Stocks.” The best one was Coeur d’Alene Mines, which went from 2 cents to $20. That kind of thing could happen again.
There are a few pure publicly traded silver companies now, and they’re generally very small-cap stocks. Institutions don’t own them, and few care about them. However, I think we’re going to see $100 or $200 silver in the next few years, and these stocks should catch fire. There used to be a whole class of investment advisors who published newsletters and made a living beating the drum about silver. They no longer exist. That tells me that silver is under-owned, nobody cares about it, and it’s going higher.
I consider silver stocks a superb speculation.
* * *
Doug Casey’s analysis lays bare the forces reshaping our financial future—and why silver may once again emerge as the “people’s money” during times of crisis. In a must-watch video, Doug pulls back the curtain on what the mainstream media won’t tell you about precious metals. Click here to watch it now.
-
Site: Catholic Conclave"The Association of Roman Catholic Women Priests (ARCWP) and the Christian community 'Home Novo' invite everyone to the ordination of Christina Moreira Vázquez as bishop." This is the wording of the invitation currently being circulated, announcing a unique event (at least in Spain): the ordination of a woman as bishop.The association, to which Moreira belongs as a priest, has already ordained Catholic Conclavehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06227218883606585321noreply@blogger.com0
-
Site: AsiaNews.itWhile the Muslim world celebrates the holiday, thousands of workers in Bangladesh are waiting for back pay from April. After Beijing, Dhaka is the world's second largest producer, employing 4.4 million workers, 60% of whom are women. Management continues to fail to meet its obligations.The frustration of the unions: 'Every year it's the same scenario. How can we celebrate with our families'
-
Site: AsiaNews.itData from a new national survey shows the growth in methamphetamine use. This phenomenon no longer affects only the northern areas traditionally close to production sites in Myanmar. As many as 300,000 people have needed medical treatment for drug addiction-related problems.
-
Site: Real Investment Advice
The graph below provides a clearer understanding of the US fiscal deficit. First, focus on the red line below, graphing the ratio of federal debt to GDP. Note that it is at the same level today as it was in […]
The post The Deficit Crisis Is Really A Recession Problem appeared first on RIA.
-
Site: Real Investment Advice
It would seem evident that most investors would understand that consumer spending drives economic growth, ultimately creating corporate earnings growth. Yet, despite this somewhat tautological statement, Wall Street appears to ignore this simple reality when forecasting forward earnings. As discussed […]
The post Does Consumer Spending Drive Earnings Growth? appeared first on RIA.
-
Site: Mises InstituteOn this episode of Power and Market, the group discusses the fallout from Musk's fight with Trump, recent reporting on Palantir contracts, and how the courts are not interested in protecting rights.
-
Site: Crisis Magazine
Jordan Peterson’s recent appearance on Jubilee’s viral YouTube debate wasn’t just another skirmish in the culture war between belief and unbelief. It revealed something deeper and more unsettling: the ongoing drama of a man caught between archetype and Incarnation, between myth and metaphysical truth. The event was less about the 20 atheists who challenged him and more about the unresolved…
-
Site: AsiaNews.itA traditionally multicultural land, the peninsula seized by Moscow from Kiev in 2014 is now seeing everything that is not Russian systematically targeted. Although even the Moscow-linked authorities recognise three 'state languages' on paper - Russian, Ukrainian and Crimean Tatar - education in native languages has almost completely disappeared from schools.
-
Site: Crisis Magazine
Sitting on Leonard Leo’s always immaculate desk—because he does not allow a piece of paper to linger more than once before handling—sits a bent, titanium rod. It reminds him of what a bad day is really like. The rod had been inserted into his daughter Margaret’s back, along her spine, to keep her spine from bending even more than what spina bifida had already caused. Her spine bent the rod…
-
Site: Zero HedgeNarcotics Dark Web Donation Scandal Weakens Czech Ruling PartyTyler Durden Fri, 06/06/2025 - 05:00
Authored by Bart Marcois via American Greatness,
Czech Prime Minister Petr Fiala built his political brand on being the ethical alternative to his populist rival, Andrej Babiš.
His supporters in Prague call him “Mr. Clean”—the pro-EU, pro-NATO leader who would restore moral authority to Czech politics after years of scandal. But he just destroyed that carefully crafted image with his tepid response to a drug money scandal.
When Your Justice Minister Takes Drug Money
The scandal reads like a dark comedy of political incompetence. Justice Minister Pavel Blažek was forced to resign after revelations that his ministry had accepted and sold 480 Bitcoin worth $45 million from Tomáš Jiříkovský—a name that should have set off every alarm bell in the Justice Ministry.
Jiříkovský wasn’t just any donor—he was the mastermind behind Sheep Marketplace and Nucleus, notorious cryptocurrency platforms where users bought illegal drugs, weapons, and other contraband. The platforms were shut down in 2016, and Jiříkovský was imprisoned for drug trafficking and weapons possession. Following his release, he apparently decided to donate his fortune to the very ministry responsible for locking him up.
The sheer audacity is breathtaking. In March 2025, Jiříkovský’s lawyer approached Blažek and offered one-third of the criminal’s Bitcoin stash as a “donation” to help digitize the justice system and combat drug use in prisons. The irony was apparently lost on everyone involved, and nobody knows where the rest of the money went.
Fiala’s Loyalty Problem
What makes this scandal particularly damaging for Fiala isn’t just the spectacular failure of due diligence—it’s how he responded when the story broke. Rather than immediately distancing himself, Fiala rushed to defend Blažek, insisting his justice minister “acted in good faith” and calling his eventual resignation a “responsible step.”
This wasn’t Fiala’s first time defending the indefensible regarding Blažek. Last year, coalition partners called for Blažek’s dismissal after he met with Russian agent of influence Martin Nejedlý, yet Fiala stood by him.
The situation is further complicated by revelations involving Fiala’s own circle. As one senior retired DEA special agent bluntly put it, “These darknet marketplaces have long been hubs for laundering money tied to Russian organized crime and intelligence services. Anyone connected with these funds should be immediately arrested, and their assets frozen without hesitation.”
Bad Political Timing
The timing couldn’t be worse for Fiala. With parliamentary elections scheduled for October, his center-right coalition is already trailing former Prime Minister Andrej Babiš’s populist ANO party by a comfortable 12 points. Fiala’s government has suffered some of the lowest approval ratings in a decade, largely because of economic pressures and a series of smaller scandals.
Now, Babiš—whom Fiala has spent years attacking for his own ethical lapses—has been handed the perfect ammunition. The government of the man who positioned himself as the ethical alternative has just been caught accepting millions from dark web drug dealers. The attack ads practically write themselves.
How Did This Happen?
The most damning aspect isn’t the donation itself—it’s the complete breakdown of basic governmental safeguards. How does a Justice Ministry staffed with prosecutors and investigators accept $45 million without conducting elementary background checks?
Intriguingly, Fiala established the office of National Security Advisor to get better security advice. He appointed self-styled hawk Tomas Pojar to that position, who in turn hired the former director of military intelligence, Jan Beroun, as his staffer. Was the failure of his national security team incompetence, or were they part of the attempted cover-up?
Their past associations cast further shadows over this scandal. Pojar was previously exposed for collaborating with Chinese intelligence officials during a trip to Beijing. Beroun was highly decorated by former President Miloš Zeman, a known ally of Vladimir Putin. Both are political allies of Blazek.
The connecting threads of this web seem to be Martin Nejedlý, a self-admitted agent of influence for Vladimir Putin. Even Tomáš Jiříkovský’s attorney, who negotiated the deal with Blazek, is an associate of Mr. Nejedly. Nejedly’s relationships with Czech political elites raise profound questions about the integrity of the Czech government’s stance on Russia. Mr. Nejedly has many friends in the Fiala cabinet.
Fiala now admits the state may have been “abused to launder criminal proceeds” and promises to convene the National Security Council to investigate. But the activities of the National Security Council are coordinated by Pojar, Blazek’s ally.
What’s Next?
With elections just months away, this scandal may have sealed Fiala’s fate. Czech voters, already frustrated by economic hardship and governmental incompetence, now have a vivid example of leadership failure: a justice minister who let his government launder drug money.
Babiš, despite his own troubles, now has a compelling narrative: the establishment lectures on ethics while covertly accepting money from criminals. It’s a narrative that resonates easily and may propel him back to power.
Ultimately, the dark web donation scandal will likely be remembered as the moment Fiala’s “Mr. Clean” image died—not through his opponents’ efforts but through his own profound failure to meet the ethical standards he set for others. In politics, there’s nothing more dangerous than hypocrisy. And this hypocrisy raises questions about Fiala’s Russian associations. If Mr. Clean isn’t so clean, maybe he isn’t so anti-Putin either.
-
Site: Zero HedgeThese Are The 20 Worst College Degrees For Finding A JobTyler Durden Fri, 06/06/2025 - 04:15
As students weigh their post-secondary options, job prospects remain a key consideration.
Visual Capitalist's Bruno Venditti reports that new data from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, current as of May 2025, highlights which college degrees have the highest unemployment rates in the U.S. workforce.
For income, mid-career is defined as ages 35 to 45.
Anthropology Tops the List
At the top of the list is anthropology. Anthropology majors face an unemployment rate of 9.4%, the highest among the 20 fields analyzed.
Fine arts and sociology follow closely, with unemployment rates of 7.0% and 6.7%, respectively. These degrees tend to offer mid-career salaries around $70,000, placing them on the lower end of the earnings spectrum.
Interestingly, some of the highest-paying degrees also have relatively high unemployment rates.
For instance, computer engineering majors earn a median of $122,000 mid-career, but face a 7.5% unemployment rate. Physics ($100,000) and computer science ($115,000) also show above-average jobless rates, at 7.8% and 6.1%, respectively.
Meanwhile, several liberal arts degrees continue to show a mismatch between pay and employment. English language, history, and liberal arts majors typically earn between $70,000 and $77,000 mid-career, with unemployment rates ranging from 4.6% to 5.3%.
Communications and journalism degrees, which offer earnings closer to $85,000, show slightly lower unemployment levels, around 4.4% to 4.5%.
Other fields such as economics, political science, and international affairs offer stronger income potential—often exceeding $90,000 mid-career—but still face moderate unemployment rates, generally between 4.7% and 5.5%.
While salary remains a strong indicator of economic outcomes, these findings underscore that a higher paycheck doesn’t always guarantee job security.
As the labor market continues to evolve, prospective students may want to weigh both earning potential and employability in their education decisions.
If you enjoyed this graphic, check out this map on Voronoi about the income needed to buy a home in every U.S. state.
-
Site: Zero HedgeSweden Urged To Halt International Adoptions After Decades Of Child Trafficking UncoveredTyler Durden Fri, 06/06/2025 - 03:30
Authored by Owen Evans via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),
A Swedish government commission has recommended halting all international adoptions after an investigation found that decades of illegal adoptions amounted to child trafficking involving state authorities and adoption agencies.
Children at Wang Jiayu Orphanage in Anhui Province, China, on July 9, 2006. China Photos/Getty Images
At a news conference in Stockholm, Swedish Social Services Minister Camilla Waltersson Gronvall told the Swedish language Epoch Times on June 2: “[There are] appalling cases of deficient background information, and even children simply being stolen from their parents.
“There has been an unreasonable level of trust in the governments of the countries of origin for the children adopted to Sweden.”
According to Human Rights Watch, roughly 60,000 people have been adopted into Sweden. It started with children from South Korea in the 1950s, and then began to include children from China, Chile, Ethiopia, India, Sri Lanka, and Thailand, peaking in the mid-1970s to 1980s. By the early 2000s, the numbers began to steadily decline.
Amid growing concerns that adopted children may have been taken from their biological parents illegally, the commission found confirmed cases of child trafficking spanning every decade from the 1970s to the 2000s.
Head of the inquiry Anna Singer, professor of civil law, told The Epoch Times that this practice is “winding down by itself.”
“Last year, 54 children were adopted to Sweden [from abroad]. ... Many countries have ceased putting children up for intercountry adoption,” she said.
“Adoption agencies are not a sustainable solution for meeting the needs of these children. It’s better to try to improve conditions in their countries of origin. Intercountry adoption may have worked to slow down such efforts.”
China in the Spotlight
The final two-volume report released on June 2, the result of a probe that started in 2021, states that Swedish adoption organizations “have taken great risks by operating in China, which has been a closed country with very limited opportunities for transparency throughout the period.”
It states that all children adopted from China were described as abandoned and lacked any background history, making it difficult, or impossible, to assess whether the adoptions were in the children’s best interests.
“Chinese authorities have confirmed that four adoptions to Sweden were linked to the systematic child trafficking in Hunan [Province] that was exposed in 2005,“ the report reads. ”However, it cannot be ruled out that more Swedish adoptions are affected by the child trafficking in China.”
Financial incentives were created, as orphanages in China were compensated with $3,000 to $5,000 per child placed for international adoption. The Swedish supervisory authority found that the orphanages were dependent on these fees.
In total, almost 4,300 adoptions from China have been carried out to date, making China the fourth-largest country of origin for adoptions to Sweden in terms of total numbers.
Most adoptions occurred during the period 2000 to 2010, when more than 3,200 children were adopted from China to Sweden.
China is one of the few countries that approved adoption of young children to single adoptive parents.
The report also states that Swedish adoption companies failed to ensure that children were made available for adoption through proper channels or that the process was in the children’s best interests.
In many cases, signed documentation from biological parents was missing, even when those parents were known. Files also often lacked critical details needed for adoptees to understand their origins.
“Ultimately, it is the Swedish State that has failed to protect the rights of children in intercountry adoption activities,“ the report reads. ”This means that the State must take responsibility for what has happened and take measures to ensure that it does not happen again.”
It recommends an official apology to adopted people and their families as well as financial aid to help those who have been adopted to travel to their country of origin.
The Netherlands said in December 2024 that it would phase out international adoptions over the next six years, after an official 2021 report found that children had been stolen or bought from their birth parents in cases going back to the 1960s.
Switzerland said in January that it also plans to end international adoptions, amid similar concerns of abuse.
Roger Sahlstrom and Reuters contributed to this report.
-
Site: Mises InstituteTraffic jams are so frequent that many Costa Ricans have adjusted their routines to deal with this phenomenon, treating it like a chronic illness.
-
Site: Mises InstituteModern neoclassical economics is based upon the physical sciences, which Austrian economists recognize is an inappropriate way to explain economic phenomena. Ludwig von Mises recognized this fraudulence, calling it “scientism.”
-
Site: Zero HedgeGermany Considers Implementing Retirement Accounts For Kids As Young As 6 Years OldTyler Durden Fri, 06/06/2025 - 02:45
Because what six-year-old doesn’t want to start planning for retirement?
Germany’s government is floating an “early start pension” for kids aged 6 to 18, according to Fortune.
Instead of relying on your own paycheck (which, at 6, probably isn't that robust), the government would pony up 10 euros ($11) a month per child. Over 12 years, that’s a whopping 1,440 euros—plus whatever compounding interest the Tooth Fairy manages to generate.
Once they hit 18, these kids can add their own cash and get tax-free gains—but no withdrawals until they’re 67. Because nothing says “carpe diem” like waiting six decades to cash in.
Fortune writes that this is all part of Germany’s plan to reform pensions, bolster private saving, and generally get people thinking about the unaffordable retirements that plague modern life. With people living longer and working well past 65, retirement is looking less like a golden sunset and more like a second job. The share of Americans over 65 who are still working has doubled since the 1980s—because that beach house just won’t buy itself.
Financial gurus like Suze Orman say Gen Z could retire millionaires if they start investing early enough. She crunches the numbers: just $100 a month at 12% growth could net them over a million bucks by 65. Now imagine starting at age 6 instead of 26—who knows, maybe they’ll be sipping umbrella drinks while their parents are still on the clock.
That is, if a million bucks even buys you a coffee in America decades from now...
-
Site: Novus Ordo Watch
Marshall quickly deleted pre-conclave episode critical of Leo XIV…
Taylor Marshall’s About-Face on Robert Prevost:
From Worst-Choice Candidate to Hope for the Church?Imagine you’re a ‘trusted Catholic influencer’ with a huge following and you publish a video about who in your opinion would be among the worst possible candidates for Pope.
For Dr. Taylor Marshall that distinction belonged to ‘Cardinal’ Pietro Parolin, but since his chances had tanked in the days just before the 2025 conclave due to alleged involvement in a financial scandal, among other things, Marshall wasn’t terribly worried about him anymore. The next in line for worst candidate in his estimation was — wait for it — ‘Cardinal’ Robert Francis Prevost.… READ MORE
-
Site: Novus Ordo Wire – Novus Ordo Watch
Marshall quickly deleted pre-conclave episode critical of Leo XIV…
Taylor Marshall’s About-Face on Robert Prevost:
From Worst-Choice Candidate to Hope for the Church?Imagine you’re a ‘trusted Catholic influencer’ with a huge following and you publish a video about who in your opinion would be among the worst possible candidates for Pope.
For Dr. Taylor Marshall that distinction belonged to ‘Cardinal’ Pietro Parolin, but since his chances had tanked in the days just before the 2025 conclave due to alleged involvement in a financial scandal, among other things, Marshall wasn’t terribly worried about him anymore. The next in line for worst candidate in his estimation was — wait for it — ‘Cardinal’ Robert Francis Prevost.… READ MORE
-
Site: The Unz ReviewUzbekistan champions "Stability Through Connectivity" by engaging pragmatically with Taliban-led Afghanistan to boost trade, manage water resources, and reduce regional tensions. Key infrastructure projects like the Trans-Afghan railway, Surkhan–Pol-e-Khumri power line, and Termez Free Economic Zone aim to link Central and South Asia. Tashkent seeks geopolitical balance, positioning itself as a bridge between East and...
-
Site: The Unz ReviewThe attack on the USS Liberty on June 8, 1967 was a false flag attack by the Israeli Air Force and Navy, meant to be blamed on Egypt, in order to draw the U.S. into bombing Egypt, and possibly to start WWIII. To succeed, the operation needed the unarmed NSA ship to be sinked with...
-
Site: The Unz ReviewThe UK has a severe structural crisis in leadership: each of the two main parties have defects that do not usually occur in tandem, but, when combined, are highly destructive. Each is oligarchic, not democratic. But, in contrast to most oligarchic regimes, each lacks the benefit of stability usually associated with oligarchic regimes — in...
-
Site: The Unz ReviewElon controls Twitter. Trump can either have him killed, or… I don’t really know what other options he has. Trump cannot really function if Twitter is weaponized against him, and Elon absolutely will do that. I think “Trump was doing Epstein island” is probably bullshit (maybe it isn’t, I don’t know), but it doesn’t matter...
-
Site: The Unz ReviewThis video is available on Rumble, Bitchute, Odysee, Telegram, and X. I just returned to the United States from one of the most charming countries in the world. It’s Slovenia, which you can see in dark green on this map, bordering Austria and Italy. It was the wealthiest part of the former Yugoslavia, and became...
-
Site: AntiWar.comThe relentless bombing of Gaza, with its gut-wrenching toll on civilian lives – children buried under rubble, families torn apart, entire neighborhoods reduced to ash – has become a grotesque spectacle on the global stage. The effort to bully Americans into co-signing this carnage, framed as a necessary strike against Hamas terrorists (whom Israel itself … Continue reading "The Gaza Crisis and the Repeal of Christianity’s Personhood Revolution"
-
Site: The Unz ReviewDemocrats constantly accuse Donald Trump of constantly lying. Journalistic factcheckers, who work for Democratic-aligned media companies, back their claims with statistics. But it's the Democratic Party that's facing historically low approval ratings. In poll after poll about one issue after another, voters say they trust Republicans more. A major contributing factor to the diminishment of...
-
Site: The Unz ReviewThere are few pieces of literature that remain as prescient and relevant throughout history as John Milton’s Paradise Lost. Thomas Jefferson, Malcolm X, Virginia Woolf, Thomas Paine and dozens more drew inspiration from and studied Milton’s grand work and the revolutionary themes within it. Professor Orlando Reade, in his book, What in Me Is Dark:...
-
Site: The Unz ReviewJournalists and politicians have repeatedly declared that populism and nationalism are fading. There have been setbacks, but the overall trend is positive. Nationalism is clearly on the rise in Europe, even though patriots face a race against time as demographics change. Romania recently crushed a right-wing challenge through tactics that most would call brutally authoritarian...
-
Site: AntiWar.comAfter twenty months of horror in Gaza, political rhetoric in Western countries is finally starting to shift – but will words translate into action? And what exactly can other countries do when the United States still shields Israel from efforts to enforce international law, as it did at the UN Security Council on June 5th? … Continue reading "Is There a Crack in Western Support for Genocide?"
-
Site: The Unz ReviewScott Ritter says the attack on Russia’s strategic bombers was a British operation that the CIA knew about. According to the White House, Trump was not informed. As Russian war doctrine calls for a strategic response to such an attack, both British and US intelligence risked launching a nuclear attack on the country or countries...
-
Site: The Unz ReviewThe Triforce overlaid over my photo of June Lake, where I had a mystical experience, represents the Divine Source at the top supported by the Divine Consciousness and the avatars) Hypothetical names for the new religion: Cosmoplatonism, Cosmotheosophy, Cosmotheism, Cosmotheology, Cosmodeism, The Church of Divine Science, and The Church of Divine Emanations. I am leaning...
-
Site: Zero HedgePeter Daszak's Smokescreen Attack on Dr. BhattacharyaTyler Durden Thu, 06/05/2025 - 22:35
Authored by Randall Bock via The Brownstone Institute,
Peter Daszak’s recent X posts (June 2, 2025) labeling Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, the new NIH Director, an “anti-science Luddite” who is “destroying public health” are a masterclass in projection.
Daszak, former head of EcoHealth Alliance (facilitator and co-conspirator of that recent pandemic, what was it called? Oh yes, SARS CoV-2 Covid-19), accuses Bhattacharya of having a “vendetta against the NIH” and claims his policies will cost lives, while pointing fingers at organizations like Brownstone Institute for being part of a right-wing conspiracy (how original!) to dismantle science. Let’s cut through the noise.
Calling Bhattacharya anti-science is absurd. Erstwhile Stanford professor and co-author of the Great Barrington Declaration, Bhattacharya has consistently championed evidence-based public health, advocating for open scientific debate over dogmatic policies. His focus on data-driven approaches—like considering natural immunity and the harms of lockdowns—earned him censorship under the previous administration. His leadership at the NIH promises transparency and rigor, both of which seem to terrify Daszak—operating without (his previous sponsor) Dr. Fauci’s golden parachute of a Biden/autopen pardon.
Now, let’s talk about Daszak’s version of “science.” EcoHealth Alliance, under his watch, funneled US. taxpayer dollars to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) for gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses—research that may have contributed to the unleashing of the novel coronavirus in Wuhan.
As I detailed in my Brownstone articles, Daszak’s collaboration with WIV’s “Bat Woman” Zhengli-Li Shi involved modifying coronaviruses to make them more infectious to humans, fitting the NIH’s own definition of gain-of-function despite his denials. That second article of mine only came about after EcoHealth Alliance’s bullying. When I had pointed out EcoHealth’s complicity in my original Dr. Anthony Fauci’s Own Gain-of-Function, Daszak’s minions tried to bully Brownstone into retracting the reference.
When that failed, he blocked me on X to dodge accountability.
How “science-y” is that? Blocking someone for raising legitimate questions about your role in a global pandemic isn’t the mark of a scientist—it’s the mark of someone with something to hide.
Daszak’s attacks on Bhattacharya are a distraction from his own failures. Why were US funds sent to a CCP-controlled lab with poor oversight instead of trusted allies? Why the lack of transparency? These questions remain unanswered, and his attempts to silence critics—like me—only deepen the suspicion around EcoHealth’s actions.
Science thrives on open debate, not censorship. Bhattacharya represents a return to that principle at the NIH, while Daszak’s behavior—blocking dissenters and evading tough questions—shows what anti-science really looks like. The public deserves better, and with Bhattacharya leading the NIH, we might finally get it.
NEVER FORGET: Peter Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance tried to quash and have Brownstone retract my: Dr. Anthony Fauci’s Own “Gain-of-Function”—October 9, 2023.
Instead, I researched further, doubled down, and produced this: “EcoHealth Alliance’s Wuhan-Virus Dalliances” October 22, 2023.
After which, crickets…Peter Daszak blocked me on X.com. The essence of bullies is cowardice.
Please see also my Fauci’s ‘DNA of Caring’ By Randall Bock, August 9, 2024, Brownstone.org.
Republished from the author’s Substack
-
Site: Zero HedgeBayer's Push For State-Level Roundup Immunity Sparks Backlash In The HeartlandTyler Durden Thu, 06/05/2025 - 22:10
In a brazen bid to shield itself from a tsunami of lawsuits over its toxic Roundup herbicide, Monsanto (acquired by Bayer Pharmaceutical) has unleashed a multi-state lobbying blitz to secure immunity from liability, with Missouri as a key battleground.
The agrochemical giant, reeling from over $8.68 billion in pre-reduction jury verdicts and $11 billion in settlements, is pushing state legislatures to pass bills that would block "failure-to-warn" claims tied to glyphosate, Roundup's cancer-linked ingredient.
But their heavy-handed tactics have sparked fierce resistance, exposing the corporate underbelly of a company desperate to dodge accountability.
In Missouri, home to Bayer's North American Crop Science headquarters, the company ramped up its lobbyists from four to nine - or about 1.29 lobbyists for each of the seven Senators of the Missouri Senate Agriculture Committee - directly before introducing Senate Bill 14, and its companion House Bill 544.
Both bills - nearly identical to those seen in each state where courts have awarded billions for harms - were aimed at shielding Monsanto-Bayer from lawsuits claiming Roundup causes non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Missouri trial lawyer Matt Clement has successfully represented clients in their claims that Roundup was the cause of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
"Monsanto is trying to push legislation that would take away constitutional rights," Clement told ZeroHedge. "It [Bayer] has not been successful in getting courts to buy its preemption argument, so it is resorting to trying to pass state legislation that will do what most courts have refused to do."
Missouri courts have already hammered Bayer with massive verdicts: $611 million, upheld on appeals in 2025 for three plaintiffs in Cole County (originally $1.56 billion), and $1.25 million for John Durnell in St. Louis.
With 40,000 cases still pending in Missouri alone, Bayer's panic seemed palpable. Their strategy? Convince lawmakers that EPA-approved labels, which omit cancer warnings - despite jurys awarding plaintiffs a whopping total of $19.68 billion in verdicts and settlements to-date - should preempt state litigation.
"State law claims, which Monsanto is trying to take away with the proposed legislation, are the only way for private citizens to hold companies accountable," Clement explains.
In 1947, Congress created The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA). Last significantly amended in 1972, FIFRA - administered by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) - requires pesticides to be registered with the EPA before they can be sold or distributed in the United States.
The law aims to ensure that pesticides are safe for human health and the environment when used according to their labeling.
However, when FIFRA was last reviewed by the EPA, the alleged harms of Roundup (backed by $19.68 billion in settlements) were not yet known. In addition, courts have held that private citizens can't use FIFRA to sue pesticide manufacturers for damages if they are injured by a chemical.
"In other words," Clement tells ZeroHedge, "only the EPA can enforce the terms of that law. Because the EPA only reviews the chemicals every fifteen years, there is no real enforcement mechanism except state law. If the proposed legislation takes that away, there is nothing left for an injured person to do."
Due to the fact that registration and warning labels are administrative law, the only way to hold a company like Monsanto-Bayer accountable for not properly warning consumers, is through state-based constitutional law. Rather than pay out billions in on-going settlements, Bayer shifted its focus to PR and lobbying state lawmakers.
Bayer's campaign, funneled through the Modern Ag Alliance and "murky groups" like the Protecting America Initiative, has spent an estimated $150,000 to $700,000 across 12 states, including Missouri, Iowa, and Georgia.
In Missouri, nine Freedom Caucus Senators were targeted—Nick Schroer, Brad Hudson, Rick Brattin, Ben Brown, David Gregory, Mike Moon, Joe Nicola, Adam Schnelting, and Jill Carter—with vicious direct-mail flyers.
The mail flyers accused the Freedom Caucus members of betraying American farmers and aiding China by opposing the bill. The senators, incensed by what they called "dark money" attacks, vowed to investigate via the Missouri Ethics Commission, effectively killing HB 544 in the Senate through a filibuster.
The missteps were catastrophic.
Bayer underestimated bipartisan fury, with 24 House Republicans and 48 Democrats rejecting the bill.
Bayer is essentially bribing both Republican and Democrat congresspeople to insert an extraordinary provision into the Farm Bill that would give the German company immunity from lawsuits over its pesticides, especially Roundup. If these products are as safe as the pesticide… https://t.co/29BJr1vKAv
— Robert F. Kennedy Jr (@RobertKennedyJr) September 13, 2024Aggressive ads and sponsorship of Governor Mike Kehoe's inauguration reeked of corporate overreach, alienating allies and fueling perceptions of prioritizing profits over public health. Critics also pointed to Monsanto's history of manipulating science, as exposed in California courts, which found the company focused on PR over safety.
Nationwide, Bayer's playbook proved more successful as Georgia passed an immunity bill (SB 144) into law this year. The new law could impact a $2.1 billion jury verdict awarded to plaintiff John Barnes, as Bayer is expected to appeal the case.
North Dakota and Montana also passed shields, but legislative efforts faced resistance in states like Iowa, Florida, Tennessee and Idaho. With 54,000–67,000 lawsuits still looming and a $16 billion litigation war chest, Bayer's now scrambling for help from the U.S. Supreme Court and lobbying hard for Farm Bill amendments that reinforce federal preemption.
However, Congress could just as easily amend FIFRA to explicitly preserve states' rights or strengthen EPA labeling oversight. Meanwhile, the Trump administration can also update EPA regulations or issue executive guidance to limit the scope of federal preemption.
These steps would close the loophole Bayer is attempting to exploit at the state level, ensuring victims of Roundup's alleged harms, can seek justice without federal interference.
Either way, the fight highlights the need for regulatory reforms as the outcome will shape pesticide regulation for years to come.
Bayer's attempt to rewrite the rules and escape accountability has only hardened resolve among farmers, health advocates, and legislators alike. But, just as this saga illustrates the "corporate capture" outlined in the MAHA Report, the fight over Roundup's label is far from over.
-
Site: Zero HedgeJudge Says Education Department Remains Barred From Canceling COVID-19 School AidTyler Durden Thu, 06/05/2025 - 21:45
Authored by Aldgra Fredly via The Epoch Times,
A federal judge issued an order on June 3 preserving a previous preliminary injunction that had blocked the Department of Education from rescinding extensions given to states for accessing COVID-19-related funds for school districts.
District Judge Edgardo Ramos of the Southern District of New York said the injunction he issued on May 6 will remain in effect amid the ongoing litigation involving 16 states and the District of Columbia, which brought the case on April 10 alleging that the Education Department’s reversal in granting the extensions for accessing the Education Stabilization Fund (ESF) was arbitrary, in violation of the law.
ESF allocated more than $276 billion to support school districts in mitigating the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.
States were initially given until Sept. 30, 2024, to obligate the use of funds, and until Jan. 28, 2025, to access the funds to liquidate the obligations.
The department later granted extensions to the plaintiffs, allowing them to access the funds through March 2026.
Education Secretary Linda McMahon subsequently informed the states in March this year that the previously granted extensions were being rescinded because the pandemic was over and extending the deadline was no longer aligned with the department’s current priorities, although the states could reapply for extensions.
In the June 3 ruling, Ramos ordered the department to process the plaintiffs’ outstanding and future requests for the funding “without delay” and provide a status report detailing the payment.
The department was also barred from enforcing a May 11 directive requiring the plaintiffs to liquidate their obligations under the ESF by May 24, according to the ruling.
The Department of Education did not return a request for comment by publication time.
Government lawyers argued in an April 24 brief that the department’s actions were not arbitrary and capricious “because rescission of the prior extension was within the Department’s discretion” and that they “did not conflict with the relevant appropriations statutes.”
The lawyers also stated that the plaintiffs would not suffer irreparable harm in the absence of an injunction because they still had the option to reapply for a fresh extension but had chosen not to do so.
Ramos issued the preliminary injunction on May 6, blocking the department from rescinding the previously approved extensions for accessing the funds. The judge also required department officials to give the plaintiffs at least 14 days’ notice before making any changes to the extensions.
The lawsuit was brought by the attorneys general of New York, Arizona, California, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, Nevada, Oregon, and the District of Columbia, as well as Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro.
-
Site: Zero HedgeSupreme Court Unanimously Rejects Mexico's $10 Billion Lawsuit Against U.S. GunmakersTyler Durden Thu, 06/05/2025 - 21:20
The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously tossed out Mexico's 2021 lawsuit against seven U.S. gunmakers and one wholesaler, ruling that firms like Smith & Wesson and Glock are shielded from liability under the federal Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA).
Mexico's lawsuit accused U.S. gunmakers of knowingly enabling illegal firearm sales to dealers linked to drug cartels, fueling cartel violence. The government sought $10 billion in damages and a court order imposing stricter rules on the marketing and distribution of firearms.
Mexico attempted to use PLCAA's narrow "predicate exception," claiming the gunmakers knowingly violated federal firearms laws by aiding and abetting illegal sales by U.S. dealers.
Here's the Supreme Court's rationale that went into their unanimous decision:
-
The Court, led by Justice Elena Kagan, found that Mexico's complaint did not plausibly allege that the manufacturers took deliberate, affirmative steps to facilitate crimes — a requirement for aiding and abetting liability.
-
Allegations that manufacturers failed to monitor dealers or cut off suspected "bad apple" dealers were deemed insufficient. Passive nonfeasance or general market activity does not amount to aiding and abetting.
-
Design and marketing choices (e.g., Spanish-language branding, military-style weapons) were not enough to imply culpability under U.S. law.
Justice Elena Kagan, writing for the majority, acknowledged rampant cartel violent crime, but found that Mexico failed to present allegations strong enough to overcome PLCAA's liability shield, rejecting claims that the gunmakers aided and abetted illegal firearm sales.
"The question presented is whether Mexico's complaint plausibly pleads that conduct. We conclude it does not," Kagan wrote.
Meanwhile, Democrats in Congress have introduced legislation intended to reduce the flow of guns across the border. Yet Democrats facilitated four years of disastrous open borders under the Biden-Harris regime era...
* * *
Read the Supreme Court's ruling.
-
-
Site: Zero HedgeUS Energy Strategy Hinges On MexicoTyler Durden Thu, 06/05/2025 - 20:55
Authored by Haley Zaremba via OilPrice.com,
-
The United States and Mexico have a vital energy trade relationship, with U.S. natural gas exports to Mexico increasing dramatically in recent decades, creating a high level of economic interdependence.
-
Experts argue that the energy trade between the U.S. and Mexico is so crucial for both nations' economies that it may be largely shielded from tariff threats, which are possibly being used for diplomatic leverage.
-
The U.S. strategy of near-shoring its energy supply chains heavily involves Mexico, making the maintenance of good relations between the two countries' leaders essential for both nations' economic and energy goals.
Tariff whiplash under the Trump administration has raised a lot of concerns about the United States’ relationship with its first- and second-largest trading partners, Canada and Mexico. This is especially true for energy trade, which all members of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) depend on to keep their economies healthy. Experts contend that recognizing the vital role of energy trade for all parties, and strengthening those relationships, is critical in these volatile times.
While this is true for all of North America, it is particularly true of the energy trade relationship between the United States and Mexico, which has massively expanded in recent decades. In January of this year, pipeline exports of natural gas from the United States to Mexico reached a whopping 199.2 billion cubic feet. That marks a more-than ten-fold increase since 2012, and a nearly 200-fold increase since 1990. This rapid growth has made the two economies more inextricably interlinked than ever before.
Because of the scale and rapid expansion of this relationship, the United States and Mexico both need a healthy energy trade relationship for their respective economic well being, according to experts.
“For Mexico, reliable access to competitively priced U.S. energy is essential to sustaining economic growth, enabling industrial competitiveness and stabilizing the electric grid,” states a recent opinion piece from The Hill, written by Duncan Wood.
“At the same time, for the U.S., Mexico has become an indispensable customer, so much so that any downturn in Mexican demand would ripple through U.S. refineries, gas producers and the infrastructure companies that have built pipelines and terminals to serve the southern market,” Wood continues.
This means that tariffs could pose a major threat to what is a foundational piece of the continental trade agreement and economy. But it could also mean that the tariffs never really stood a chance. In April of this year, Carlos Guadarrama, a senior energy consultant at the World Bank, said that energy trade between the two countries is so integrated and important that it is essentially shielded from tariffs, and implied that Trump’s tariff rope-a-dope with Mexico is founded on empty threats.
“I don’t think the tariffs will impact bilateral energy trade because at this point, we’ve seen the U.S. threaten tariffs on Mexico several times,” Guadarrama told Natural Gas Intelligence.
“I think Trump is using the tariffs as a threatening mechanism so that the Mexican government complies with the U.S. on other requests and areas of interest beyond energy, and I personally don’t think they will have any effect in bilateral trade when it comes to energy,” he went on to say.
This means that the two new presidents of the United States and Mexico, Donald Trump and Claudia Sheinbaum, will need to maintain good relations and a high level of diplomacy if the United States wants to keep making money off of Mexico’s grid, and Mexico wants to keep growing its own economy using relatively cheap and abundant American energy imports.
What is more, maintaining energy trade relations with Mexico is paramount to the United States’ own energy strategy, which is moving away from global supply chains and toward friend-shoring and near-shoring. Around this time last year, the Atlantic Council reported that cooperation between the two new regimes in the United States and Mexico would be critical for loosening trade reliance on China. The United States’ plans for nearshoring its energy supply chains – moving their lines of production closer to home – feature Mexico prominently.
At that time, when the potential outcome of the United States election was still the subject of much debate, the Atlantic Council advised that “The United States should seize the opportunity to work with the incoming Sheinbaum administration to strengthen the Mexican energy sector, thereby enabling supply chain security gains through nearshoring.”
So far, Trump has worked against Mexico as much as with them. But with such complementary mutually beneficial energy market needs, he may just be blowing smoke.
-
-
Site: Public Discourse
Editors’ Note: This is Part II of a two-part essay on Jonathan Rauch’s Cross Purposes: Christianity’s Broken Bargain with Democracy.
Rauch presents his proposal of his “Gospel of Compromise,” we have noted, as a recovery of a “thick Christianity,” as opposed to the “sharp,” that is, conservatively accented version. He regards his favored version as “thick” because he thinks it offers a way of reconciling human and divine law, a way of seeing liberalism’s “permanent process of public negotiation” as a core value of Christianity. It is in this context that Rauch offers his surprising proposal, namely that the teachings of the LDS Church offer the most perfect specimen of the “thick theology” he is looking for.
The “thick” theology that thrilled Rauch comes down essentially to placing “good-faith negotiation at the very center of the Constitution’s meaning.” This approach, Rauch argues, goes far beyond mere mechanical difference-splitting to foster a “creative, generative, pro-social endeavor,” one allows the parties to develop “peaceful habits of collaboration, and feelings of goodwill and fellowship.” At the same time, Rauch observes, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints continues to make rigorous demands on the personal lives of its members, thus “combining high personal investment with high communal returns.” Thus, although Rauch recognizes that Latter-day Saints continue to affirm a teaching on homosexuality that is “repugnant and harmful,” as well as a view of gender roles that is “discriminatory and archaic,” he finds the church’s ideas about “pluralism” “compelling.”
Rauch’s proposal of an LDS–liberal alliance does not address only immediate and practical concerns. The author ventures briefly but suggestively into a properly theological engagement with LDS beliefs. This engagement centers on the idea of “agency,” which he rightly understands to be a central idea of LDS theology and anthropology. Rauch highlights the distinctive interpretation of Adam’s fall, certainly a very unorthodox or heretical doctrine from the standpoint of the mainstream Augustinian tradition of Western Christianity, namely, that Adam’s “transgression” was gloriously good news. Rauch cites LDS scholars Terryl and Fiona Givens: “Instead of deploring Eve’s and Adam’s transgression, one might find in it a cause for rejoicing.”
This is not the place for a full or even adequate account of LDS doctrine, which is surely no more free of paradox and mystery (how can it be good to transgress God’s law?) than the traditional Augustinian view. But Rauch is certainly right that there is something distinctive in the foundations of LDS belief that grounds the goodness of human choice and practical action in an understanding of ultimate reality and a “great plan of happiness” laid down before the foundation of the world. Rauch writes that, for the Latter-day Saints, “[l]ife is not a process of moral repair or atonement under the oppressive curse of original sin; it is a process of moral development under the tutelage of experience.”
To be sure, Rauch is mistaken to sever “moral repair” from “moral development,” and his argument approaches self-refutation when he extends it to claim that, for the LDS, “we cannot develop morally unless we confront all kinds of choices.” From this he thinks there is “but a short step to Madisonian pluralism.” If what Rauch calls Madisonian pluralism is equivalent to the view that a political community can somehow be morally neutral and boundlessly pluralist, yet based on materialistic science, then this small step is in fact a gigantic leap across an unseen abyss. Let us grant, all the same, that Rauch has put his finger on a distinctive feature of LDS belief that is relevant to the question of Christianity and liberalism.
Rauch skillfully, though in the end preposterously, appeals to Latter-day Saints with the heady possibility that they might provide the model of a new interpretation of Christianity centered on those teachings or dispositions he elevates as truly Christian (as well as “Madisonian”): the disposition to forgive and to have no fear of secularism, and the readiness to “negotiate” all the way down to our very understanding of the human good. The effectual truth of this appeal to his truncated version of LDS belief is that the acceptance of political exile and complacency in negotiation on liberal terms will continue to rise to ascendancy over those substantive LDS beliefs that he regards as “discriminatory and archaic.” This is the hand of friendship that Jonathan Rauch has extended, no doubt in all sincerity, to American members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Certainly it does more credit to the obliging good will of his LDS audience than to their intellectual discretion that not a few seem inclined to accept the invitation, or, at least, to praise the gesture.
Rauch is not wrong to place “agency” at the heart of LDS belief. But he distorts it beyond recognition by reducing this rich concept, deeply embedded in a moral and cosmological vision, to the idea that the best social framework for the development of our humanity is one with the least encumbrance of moral authority, that more “choice” is always better, and, finally that the act of choosing can be considered the essence of human meaning, without reference to the reality of good and evil that is thought to guide our choices. Rauch does not even pause to consider the question whether the ideal of limitless choice is in any way practicable, or even thinkable as an ethical principle. His understanding of “agency” is neither a remotely adequate phenomenology of human choice nor a serious rendering of LDS belief. In fact, LDS leaders have generally qualified the word “agency” with the word “moral,” precisely to avoid the nonsensical proposition that more freedom, a freedom divorced from moral accountability, is always better.
LDS agency is very clearly a moral and lawful agency, an understanding of active human choice as central to man’s eternal vocation, but emphatically within a divine plan and a morally meaningful cosmos. Inconveniently for Rauch, this divine plan affirms the centrality of the procreative family. This is the great irony in Rauch’s attempt to cement a deep alliance with the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in forging a liberal future unimpeded by any enduring moral contents that cannot be generated from within the purely scientific-constitutional framework that he proposes: Latter-day Saints are arguably the most fundamentally irreconcilable of all religious groupings to his post-Obergefell liberal settlement. Latter-day Saints believe, not only that the highest meaning of marriage is both natural (heterosexual) and sacramental, but also, and perhaps uniquely, that the marriage between man and woman is eternal and grounded in the eternal significance of sexual difference and complementarity.
More generally, the LDS concept of agency is inseparable from a belief in eternal standards of righteousness and in a rigorously normative “plan of salvation.” That said, Rauch is not wrong to point to a distinct break in LDS teachings with the anthropology of creedal Christianity. The second of our thirteen “Articles of Faith” (formulated by Joseph Smith in response to a Chicago newspaper reporter) is as plain as can be about the rupture with all things Augustinian: “We believe that men will be punished for their own sins, and not for Adam’s transgression.” Thus, the LDS idea of “agency” is bound up with a Christian concept of “sin,” or the recognition of the orientation of human freedom by permanent principles of right and wrong, good and evil.
To be clear, this is not to say that the LDS understanding of human freedom falls into the category of a Pelagian reliance on works as opposed to grace. The Third Article of Faith makes clear the dependence of human agency on divine redemption: “We believe that, through the Atonement of Christ, all mankind may be saved, by obedience to the laws and ordinances of the Gospel.” Agency, for Latter-day Saints, is inseparable from the “infinite atonement” effected by the Savior’s ultimate sacrifice.
A Time for Compromise?
It is precisely in order to guard against the potential antinomian tendencies of the concept of “agency” when elevated to the status of a leading principle that LDS authorities routinely favor the expression “moral agency” to indicate the profound difference with a purely secular and liberal understanding of individual freedom. Rauch’s appropriation of the LDS term “agency” is thus tendentious at best. This is not to deny that Rauch’s spin on agency has found some resonance among Latter-day Saints eager to make peace with mainstream liberalism. This readiness to entertain Rauch’s liberal politics of negotiation must be understood against the background of recent LDS experience in the political realm. Some church leaders were apparently surprised by the negative publicity and violent acts of discrimination and anti-religious hatred that resulted from its institutional support in 2008 for California’s Proposition 8 against homosexual marriage. It might be argued as well that some LDS church members have been insufficiently appreciative of the positive cultural and evangelical effects of the church’s alliance in this cause with Roman Catholics and others committed to the defense of marriage. The Church’s outward-facing posture since the struggle in California and the Supreme Court’s 2015 decision in Obergefell has been to look for opportunities to make peace with advocates of homosexual rights and to participate in the fashioning of legislative compromises.
The trade-offs of these compromises and their long-term effects are certainly debatable, but it is important to note that the church has made very clear in the case of every political compromise that no changes are intended to its fundamental moral and religious doctrines. The church’s position has clearly been that the religious meaning of “marriage” has not changed, even though we must learn the uses of political pragmatism, so it is argued, in order to secure the protection of our religious freedom. To be sure, the path of pragmatism can prove to be a slippery slope, and this slipperiness appears in the very rhetoric that seems necessary to justify compromise.
Rather than simply acknowledging the necessity to accommodate political circumstances unfavorable to certain basic teachings of the church, defenders of compromise almost irresistibly slip into a vocabulary of “fairness” and “respect” that all but explicitly concedes moral equivalence to opinions fundamentally opposed to what are held to be sacred truths. In a democratic system, it is hard to address pragmatic political necessities without adopting language that goes well beyond the strictly pragmatic. The “respect” inherent in the process of coming to terms with a political rival is almost irresistibly defended, in the relativistic language of equal respect for all opinions (which of course does not follow from respect for persons as such). It is hard to make a democratic bargain on the basis of a rhetoric that says: “You are profoundly and disastrously wrong, but I see for now that your view must to some degree prevail.”
Even more concerning is the apparently irresistible temptation to cover political necessity with the Christian language of love: I compromise with you because I have been commanded to love you. Here the bond between the first part of the Great Commandment, to love God absolutely, is at risk of being absorbed by the second part, the love of fellow human beings. The Christian commitment to “peacemaking” comes perilously close to endorsing not only the fundamental dignity of all God’s children, but even the ideological self-understanding of those with whom we find that we must compromise. Christian love thus risks losing its vertical orientation, its moral and religious substance, as it embraces the rhetoric inherent in democratic political compromise. It is one thing to submit obediently to a post-Obergefell political and legal regime; it is another step, a fateful one, to deny that at some fundamental level the new regime is based on a mistaken view of reality, not to say on a lie, and thus can only have disastrous consequences in the long term. If the metaphysical demand for human autonomy that underlies the radical redefinition of marriage is wrong, even evil, then it would be wrong to “respect” it, even when we must accommodate it legally and politically.
It is precisely the audacity of the secular liberal project, the imprudence of a liberalism that declares its independence from all traditional and religious morality, that is apparently inaudible to Jonathan Rauch and those who celebrate his proposed “Christian”–liberal alliance. The secular prophets of a pure and autonomous liberalism simply assume as true the false liberal proposition that opinions may be regarded as equally worthy of “respect,” and thus as equally subject to negotiation and compromise, regardless of their bearing on the realities of human nature and the human condition. When truth is defined in terms of democratic negotiation, then propositions of the public good that appeal to natural or divine truths not subject to human mastery are disqualified in principle. Democratic process is no longer the negotiation of serious, substantive truth-claims, but itself advanced as a substitute for truth. In Rauch’s view of liberalism, “love” no longer implies concern for the natural happiness or the eternal soul of one’s neighbor, but equal “respect” for all opinions, lifestyles, and identities.
But again, although some LDS advocates of “Fairness for All” have shown a weakness for rhetoric that tends to slip toward progressive relativism, the substance of LDS teaching is very clearly on the side of permanent moral and anthropological truths, especially where sexuality and procreation are concerned. Rauch and others who hopefully await the LDS church’s renegotiating of the religious understanding of marriage to include a same-sex version will be disappointed. The church’s authoritative (and not at all innovative) 1995 statement on the matter, its Proclamation to the World on the Family, clearly states: “We [the First Presidency and Quorum of the Twelve Apostles] warn that the disintegration of the family will bring upon individuals, communities, and nations the calamities foretold by ancient and modern prophets.” This bold and clear proclamation, which church leaders have emphatically endorsed throughout the recent period of political pragmatism, is hardly compatible with the rhetoric of “equal respect” for all politically powerful viewpoints.
Moral Agency and Sustainable Liberalism
More characteristic of LDS social teaching addressed to the faithful as religious teaching (as opposed to pragmatic accommodation) is an official General Conference address by Elder D. Todd Christofferson of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles on “Sustainable Societies” (2020). The question of sustainability necessarily points beyond the immediate necessities of negotiation and compromise to the deeper problem of the enduring parameters of human nature and thus to the ineluctable preconditions of a healthy society. Christofferson plainly states: “when people turn from a sense of accountability to God and begin to trust instead in the ‘arm of flesh,’ disaster lurks. Trusting in the arm of flesh is to ignore the divine Author of human rights and human dignity and to give highest priority to riches, power, and the praise of the world (while often mocking and persecuting those who follow a different standard).”
He continues:
A society . . . in which individual consent is the only constraint on sexual activity is a society in decay . . . Follow-on consequences that work against sustainability of a healthy society include growing numbers of children raised in poverty and without the positive influence of fathers, sometimes through multiple generations; women bearing alone what should be shared responsibilities; and seriously deficient education as schools, like other institutions, are tasked to compensate for failure in the home.
These reflections and authoritative teachings are in a register wholly unlike the view of religion at work in Rauch’s search for a religion that might provide a moral backstop for his autonomous liberalism. The point is not so much that Christofferson gives answers to social and political problems that are different from Rauch’s. What we cannot fail to notice is that he asks questions that Rauch (and his temporarily enthralled LDS audience) have altogether forgotten to ask. Beginning from a pseudo-Madisonian perspective of individual rights as the most fundamental concept of political theory, Rauch is not even aware of the problem of sustainability, or, therefore, of the question of the human good or of the common good of the political body.
We may choose, or not, like Rauch, to consider all rights as, at bottom, assertions of our autonomous humanity and thus ultimately matters of social and political compromise, but the natural conditions of happiness and sustainability, including the essential role of the natural reproductive family, will not be subject to our negotiation. Rauch would do well to consult, on the question of compromise and its limits, a classic address by Elder Dallin Oaks:
Our tolerance and respect for others and their beliefs does not cause us to abandon our commitment to the truths we understand and the covenants we have made. . . . We are cast as combatants in the war between truth and error. There is no middle ground. We must stand up for truth, even while we practice tolerance and respect for beliefs and ideas different from our own and for the people who hold them.
If moral principle is not only an accident of religious belief but grounded in the truth of human nature and the human vocation, it follows that any peace based on Rauch’s violent stretching of the LDS theology of “agency” must be ill-founded and by nature unsustainable. Without undertaking a presentation of this theology, let me conclude with a suggestion of its real value and bearing on our present political circumstances, that is, on the present stage of the crisis of liberalism. If there is a contemporary political lesson to be drawn from the LDS idea of the eternal significance of moral agency, this insight would not at all be aligned with Rauch’s fundamentally secular and ostensibly neutral and pseudo-scientific liberalism.
Instead, one might find in a certain “moral agency” the outlines of a view of humanity and eternity that would resonate with a kind of conservative liberalism, a practical yet deeply moral liberalism equipped to avoid the pitfalls of integralism, both left and right. The LDS understanding of moral agency is in the spirit of Tocqueville’s praise of “liberty under God and the laws”; it weaves together eternal law and personal choice in a practically meaningful way that resonates at the deepest, ontological level. The touchstone of this moral agency is neither the supposedly pre-modern attitude of “heteronomy,” nor the chimera of liberal “autonomy,” but the reality of productive, creative action under a personal God and Savior within an orderly and meaningful cosmos.
Image by Seadog81 and licensed via Adobe Stock.
-
Site: Ron Paul Institute for Peace And Prosperity
During the United States presidential election last year, then Libertarian Party Chairman Angela McArdle spoke openly of her desire to use the Libertarian Party to help elect Republican Party presidential nominee Donald Trump. She even arranged for Trump to make a campaign speech at the Libertarian Party’s national convention and released through the party, around a week before election day, a video promoting Trump.
Via a Thursday post at Twitter, McArdle suggested to fellow Trump campaign supporter Elon Musk, who went on to become a Trump administration official leading the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), that Musk “should just take over the Libertarian Party.” Doing so is “not hard,” McArdle added. McArdle was replying to a post in which Musk had brought up the possibility of starting a new political party.
McArdle, who resigned her party chairmanship less than three months after the presidential election, apparently knows a thing or two about taking over the Libertarian Party. But, if Musk wants to take over the party, he may have to act quickly. Last month, Steven Nekhaila, who became chairman of the Libertarian Party after McArdle’s resignation, warned the Libertarian National Committee, which oversees the party, that the party is on the verge of a “full collapse.”
-
Site: 4ChristumAlthough he is being convicted by the Argentine courts, Bergoglio never initiated any canonical proceedings against him to remove him from clerical status.Homosexual predator Gustavo Zanchetta returns to his victims' diocese to serve a lax house arrest in a Convent.Zanchetta, even though he has been convicted by the Argentine justice system, continues to be treated as if he were a retired bishop, just as happened with the homosexual predator McCarrick.
Zanchetta spent more than a year in Rome due to alleged health problems and only spent four months in prison.His protégé in Oran, Luis Antonio Scozzina, authorized the house arrest of the homosexual convicted Zanchetta in a convent.Parishioners reject Zanchetta's house arrest in a convent.In Prevost's church the gates of Hell prevail, which are heresy and vice. -
Site: PaulCraigRoberts.org
Can Reality Any Longer Be Acknowledged?
Paul Craig Roberts
The attack on Russian strategic forces by Ukraine, with or without President Trump’s knowledge and with or without help from Washington and the British, could have been the most dangerous event in East-West relations during my lifetime. The reason is that recently revised Russian war doctrine states that an attack, even by a non-nuclear country, on the Russian strategic triad requires a strategic response. Strategic usually means nuclear or at least a disabling response.
Putin dodged the responsibility (more later), but no one knew for certain that he would. In other words, whoever is responsible for the attack on Russia’s strategic bombers subjected Ukraine, Europe, the US to the possibility of nuclear attack, depending on whom the Russians decided was responsible. This person or persons is a madman, a maniac who must be identified and removed from his position. Try to imagine how it is possible for, say Zelensky, to launch an attack that could result in nuclear war between the US and Russia. How can control over whether or not the US faces nuclear war be in the hands of Zelensky? If Zelensky is responsible, the US and NATO have a massive failure in command and control. If Trump or someone in the Trump administration gave the green light, they should be removed for committing the most potentially dangerous act during my lifetime.
The extraordinarily reckless and extremely dangerous attack on Russia’s nuclear triad is being treated by all concerned as a nothing event, a mere terrorist act, not an act of war. The fact that there is no acknowledgement in Washington, Europe, Moscow, or the media of the seriousness of an attack on Russian strategic forces, and thereby no measures put in place to prevent such dangerous acts, means either full scale, not proxy, war between Russia and the West or Russia’s surrender. Perhaps Putin would like to surrender in order to avoid nuclear war, but he won’t be permitted to surrender.
Putin took the lead in burying the seriousness of the attack on Russia’s nuclear triad. By designating the attack a “terrorist act” he evades the responsibility that Russian strategic doctrine imposes on him for a strategic response.
Nothing of consequence has happened, says the President of Russia. Amen say Washington and Europe. Therefore, whoever is responsible for the attack knows that the next attack can go further. It too will be unacknowledged as an act of war.
How many times can Putin pretend that attacks on Russia’s sovereignty, which is what attacks on Russia’s nuclear triad are, are mere terrorist events before he discredits himself with the Russian people?
The purpose of the recent revision of Russian strategic doctrine was to discourage or prevent attacks by Western proxies such as Ukraine on Russian strategic forces. It failed because Putin has taught the West not to take him seriously. He is ever ready to turn the other cheek. Now Putin has shown that he will not acknowledge attacks on Russian strategic forces as anything other than a terrorist event, not an act of war. So Putin has negated Russian strategic doctrine. It means nothing. Now that the West knows this, Russia can expect escalating provocations. All of Putin’s good intentions have ended in disaster, and a major war will be the consequence.
It could be that Russia is doomed. Decades of successful Western propaganda have turned most of the Russian professional and intellectual class into Atlanticist Integrationists. They think that Russia belongs as part of the West and are willing to make concessions of sovereignty to be part of the West. Clearly this point of view is strong in the Kremlin and the Russian Foreign Ministry.
The zionist American neoconservatives are very much aware of this Russian weakness, and they are adept at taking advantage of it. They don’t have to do much, because Putin does their work for them.
Putin has declared Ukraine to be conducting terrorism, not war, against Russia. Putin’s declaration also absolves Washington and Europe for any responsibility.
Here are English language Russian headlines of Putin’s hiding from reality that apparently he is unable to face up to. Or perhaps he is not yet ready, being at work constructing a powerful military that US/NATO cannot resist.
“‘Illegitimate Kiev regime’ turning into terrorist organization” – Putin
“The latest terrorist acts carried out by Ukraine in Russia are the outcome of decisions made by the Ukrainian political leadership.” Putin added that “the decisions to carry out such crimes were, of course, made in Ukraine” by the political leadership in Ukraine. In other words, Washington and Europe have no responsibility for the act of war, which is not an act of war, but merely terrorism. https://www.rt.com/russia/618651-kiev-regime-rejecting-peace/
In other words, the Kremlin has said that Washington and Europe have nothing to do with the attack on Russia’s strategic triad, and that Ukraine is merely creating terrorist incidents, not making war against Russia. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2025/01/31/russia-ukraine-rubio-trump/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=wp_opinions
I find it hard to believe that Putin is this stupid. My bet is that he is not yet ready. He keeps the minor Ukraine conflict going while he builds up to remove NATO from Russian borders.
Trump can remove the coming conflict by giving Putin the mutual security agreement Russia has been requesting for years. This would be the costless solution, but Trump is not really in power, and the power and profit of the US military/security complex needs the Russian Enemy.
So, how will a devastating war be avoided? Information such as I have just presented is banned by the official narratives.
Pages
