That Christianity gives joy and breadth is also a thread that runs through my whole life. Ultimately someone who is always only in opposition could not endure life at all.
Distinction Matter - Subscribed Feeds
-
Site: AsiaNews.itThe Filipino president has announced a "cabinet reshuffle" to "adjust our actions to the expectations of the people." The failure to elect five out of eleven candidates for Senate seats, crucial in the battle against the "Duterte clan," weighs heavily. The goal is to revitalise the administration's initiatives to overcome poverty, inadequate public services, and limited opportunities for young people.
-
Site: AsiaNews.itThe outcome of the recent round of elections for the renewal of several municipal councils remains uncertain in many cases. In over 150 municipalities, no party or alliance holds an outright majority. The first meeting is scheduled for 2nd June. The opposition parties are attempting a difficult path towards unity in an effort to wrest control of the administrations from the ruling majority.
-
Site: PaulCraigRoberts.org
America’s Real Foreign Policy
Paul Craig Roberts
It is amazing how difficult it is for the Western foreign policy community and media to recognize and acknowledge facts. Generally speaking, analysts who tell you the difference between the truth and the narrative are brushed aside. All sorts of dismissive names are applied to us few, and false narratives serving agendas prevail. Policymakers themselves end up believing the false narratives, and this raises the risks of dangerous miscalculations.
For example, one of the most dangerous of the false narratives is that the slowness of Russia’s military advance against Ukraine is the consequence of Russian military weakness, high Russian battlefield casualties, the vulnerability of the Russian economy to US sanctions, and Putin’s unrealistic expectation to be regarded by Ukrainians as a liberator.
The truth is entirely different. Every time Putin endorses negotiations, he emphasizes that they must address the “root cause” of the conflict. The root cause is the absence of a Great Power Agreement. Putin is using a long drawn out war that the West tires of to initiate “peace negotiations” that Putin hopes to turn into a Great Power Agreement like the one he and his foreign minister failed to achieve in the winter of 2021-2022.
Washington policymakers have concluded that Russia’s weakness allows the US to withdraw from Ukraine and turn the war over to Europeans, while Washington gears up to deal with the more dangerous enemy–China. Failed Ukraine peace negotiations are the intended excuse for Trump washing his hands and walking away. What it signifies is Washington’s refocusing on China as the most dangerous adversary.
It is my opinion that China is not an adversary any more than Russia and Iran are, but the narrative demands that they are adversaries. The American military/security complex cannot exist without adversaries. That is the reason America has adversaries. Without adversaries what would the CIA, NSA, Defense Intelligence Agency, think tanks such as the Center for Strategic and International Studies, organizations such as the Council on Foreign Relations, university international studies departments, and publications such as Foreign Affairs do? The United States has massive vested interests in having adversaries, the more dangerous the better.
The question has arisen: How does the US deal with so many adversaries. Formerly, we were assured that we could defeat all adversaries simultaneously. Today it is recognized that we cannot. Wess Mitchell in a recent article in Foreign Affairs says it is the policy of the Trump administration to sequence its conflicts. As Washington regards Russia as the weaker of its two main “adversaries,” Washington is turning the Ukraine conflict over to its European puppets while Washington takes on China.
Wess Mitchell, a former Trump senior defense department official, wipes out the narratives and tells us the policy. And no one other than John Helper and myself have commented on it.
Here is Secretary of State Marco Rubio telling the US Senate yesterday what I have told you, what John Helmer has told you, and what Wess Mitchell has told you: The purpose of the Ukraine “peace negotiations” is for the US to exit the conflict and focus on China. Here are Rubio’s words:
The war against China, Secretary of State Marco Rubio told a Senate committee hearing on Tuesday (May 20) – is now the strategic priority for the US. Implementing it requires sequencing Washington’s wars. “Every minute we spend, every dollar we spend on this conflict in Europe [Ukraine] is distracting both our focus and our resources away from a potential for a much more serious and much more cataclysmic confrontation in the Indo-Pacific…they are related but they’re related both ways — they’re related on the one hand by the precedent that it could set, but they’re also related by the fact that every minute that we spend on this [Ukraine] conflict that cannot be won by military means, every resource that’s expended into it [Ukraine] is money and time that’s not being spent on preventing a much more serious confrontation from a global perspective in the Indo-Pacific.” Rubio clearly states that the prime target is China.
You can watch and hear Rubio speak here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xiRGVc2J73s at the 53 minute 51 second mark.
In my judgment based on the knowledge I have at the present time, Putin and the Russian foreign policy commentators do not understand what is afoot. Putin is lost in hopes that peace negotiations can be turned into a Great Power Agreement, a new Yalta. That would be a greater achievement than merely winning a military conflict with Ukraine and, therefore, is worth the sacrifices of Russian troops in a conflict in which Putin prevents a victory, as a victory would prevent the negotiations that Putin imagines could become a Great Power Agreement.
If Putin had immediately smashed Ukraine, Russia would be regarded as a Great Power and would have obtained its Great Power Agreement. Instead, Putin created the image of a weak Russia that can be sidelined to Europe while Washington takes on China.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73eXRlduSa0
https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2025/05/21/how-america-is-being-made-great-again/
Here is John Helmer’s report: https://johnhelmer.net/the-politics-of-the-slow-russian-army-movement-westward/
-
Site: PaulCraigRoberts.org
The Ever-Widening War Has Widened Further
Paul Craig Roberts
https://johnhelmer.net/maga-v-mega-mad-v-lunacy-putin-v-trump-the-new-podcast/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CCyAkxfOiW4
Sebastian Gorka has been a US citizen for only 12 years, and he is Deputy Assistant to President Trump and Senior Director for Counterterrorism. Immigrant-invaders along with Zionists now determine US war policies.
Putin’s desire for a Great Power Agreement makes it easy for Washington to again walk him down the garden path to another deceptive agreement. The “peace negotiations” will be Minsk all over again.
Kremlin spokesman Peskov describes the nature of the needed Great Power Agreement, but Russia is not going to get it:
“The course of events requires the resumption of contacts between Russia and the United States on issues of strategic stability in the interests of global security. Now that the legal framework in this area has been destroyed, the validity period has expired and deliberately, let’s say, a number of documents have ceased to be valid, this base must be recreated both in the interests of our two countries and in the interests of security throughout the planet.”
The Kremlin fails to understand that Washington is concerned with its hegemony, not the world’s security. The conflicts with Russia, China, and Iran are all manufactured to serve war profits and US hegemony.
Putin and Lavrov worked hard for a mutual security agreement during the winter of 2021 and 2022 and were refused by the Biden regime, NATO, and the EU, thus forcing Russia to enter the Russian provinces of Ukraine. Russia is again going to be refused. What will be the consequences this time?
The world needs to become aware that the US and Europe are pushing the world into Armageddon. All the talk about peace is cover for the wars that are being prepared in Washington and Europe. The Russians and the Chinese are so slow to catch on.
Here is John Helmer’s report:
https://johnhelmer.net/maga-v-mega-mad-v-lunacy-putin-v-trump-the-new-podcast/
-
Site: PaulCraigRoberts.org
All Compromises Will Have to be Made by Washington
PCR and Nima have a reality talk, the real reality.
-
Site: LifeNews
The full House of Representatives has passed the reconciliation bill to defund the Planned Parenthood abortion business.
The bill passed 215-214. Two Republicans voted against the bill — Reps. Thomas Massie and Warren Davidson — and another, House Freedom Caucus Chairman Andy Harris, voted “present.” Rep. Andrew Garbarino and Rep. David Schweikert missed the vote.
“We’re going to get it [to Trump’s desk] by Independence Day, July 4th,” House Speaker Mike Johnson said Thursday regarding the budget bill.
The House Energy and Commerce Committee signed off on the bill first last week and then the House Budget Committee followed suit over the weekend.
SUPPORT LIFENEWS! If you want to help fight abortion, please donate to LifeNews.com!
The good news for pro-life Americans is that the measure includes language to defund Planned Parenthood and Big Abortion. The abortion giant just announced that it killed over 420,000 babies in aboritons in its most recent year and mamade over $2 billion.
Nearly all committee Republicans voted against an amendment brought by pro-abortion Democrat Rep. Lizzie Fletcher to strike the language that would prohibit Planned Parenthood from receiving federal funds, even through Medicaid payments. Republican Reps. Mariannette Miller-Meeks and Gabe Evans did not vote on the amendment.
March for Life Action president Jennie Bradley Lichter celebrated the vote.
“Today, March for Life Action welcomes the House of Representatives’ passage of a strong pro-family reconciliation package that supports mothers and their children, and stops spending taxpayer dollars to subsidize Big Abortion. As this bill advances to the Senate, we express our sincere thanks to President Trump, Speaker Mike Johnson, and other House leaders, for their bold pro-life leadership. Their commitment and common-sense negotiations ensured critical resources will be used to benefit American families instead of padding the pockets of the deadly Big Abortion industry.”
Students for Life Action President Kristan Hawkins celebrated the vote in the U.S. House that advances President Trump’s “Big, Beautiful Bill” without support for the abortion industry, including Planned Parenthood, and said: “Our country needs to invest in hope and a future for everyone, born and preborn. As Planned Parenthood’s annual report just revealed, American taxpayers have been forced to be in the business of supporting the abortion industry, which bragged about ending the lives of over 400,000 babies last year. As I’ve said before, Planned Parenthood can go fund themselves.”
The Catholic Association Senior Fellow Ashley McGuire also applauded Republicans for approving the bill.“American taxpayers overwhelmingly oppose to funding abortions and harmful hormones for children. Planned Parenthood is a corporate abortion chain that is a leading provider of both, without basic and commonsense health and safety guardrails. As was highlighted in a recent New York Times exposé, their clinics are filthy and hazardous, where women are left bleeding on dirty tables and where children are given life-altering transition hormones in many cases without informed consent or parental knowledge. America’s women and children deserve better and American taxpayers should have no role in funding these atrocities. We applaud the House’s efforts to protect women and children from exploitation at these dangerous clinics.”“Today Congress took a big step toward stopping forced taxpayer funding of the Big Abortion industry. This is a crucial win in the fight against America’s #1 cause of death – abortion – and against waste and corruption,” said SBA Pro-Life America PresidentMarjorie Dannenfelser. “While House Democrats lied and fearmongered throughout this process, the truth is women have real choices for their health care, with community health centers that offer far more comprehensive care outnumbering Planned Parenthood facilities 15:1 nationwide. Medicaid will be stronger for those who need it most. There is no excuse for forcing taxpayers to prop up a scandal-ridden industry that prioritizes abortions, gender transitions and partisan political activism instead of prenatal care, cancer screening and other legitimate health services that are in continual decline.The reconciliation process, which allows legislation to pass the Senate with a simple majority, offers Republicans a rare opportunity to strip federal funding from Planned Parenthood, the nation’s largest abortion business. Pro-life groups argue that taxpayer dollars, even if not directly funding abortions, indirectly subsidize Planned Parenthood’s operations, which include killing over 390,000 babies every year.
Pro-life advocates emphasize that community health centers, which outnumber Planned Parenthood clinics and provide comprehensive care without abortions, can absorb patients if funding is redirected.
House Speaker Mike Johnson, a staunch pro-life advocate, has signaled that defunding “big abortion” is a priority in the reconciliation bill, which also addresses Trump’s agenda on taxes, border security, and energy.
The Hyde Amendment already prohibits federal funds from directly paying for abortions, except in cases of rape, incest, or to save the mother’s life. However, Planned Parenthood receives approximately $700 million annually through Medicaid reimbursements and Title X grants. Pro-life leaders argue this funding frees up resources for Planned Parenthood’s abortion operations.
The reconciliation bill, which allows legislation to pass with a simple majority in both chambers, is seen as a critical opportunity to strip federal funding from Planned Parenthood, the nation’s largest abortion business. The abortion company received nearly $700 million in taxpayer funds in its 2022-2023 fiscal year, killing 392,715 babies in abortions, according to its annual report.
Meanwhile, Representative Mary Miller (R-Ill.) is waging a fierce campaign among her Republican colleagues to make defunding Planned Parenthood a non-negotiable piece of the final proposal.
Miller sent a passionate letter to Rep. Brett Guthrie (R-Ky.), chairman of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, obtained by Breitbart News. In it, she urged Guthrie to “use every legislative option available to cease all federal funds going to Planned Parenthood,” exposing the organization’s deep entanglement in abortion and transgender treatments. “Abortions and transgender treatments have exploded in clinics across the country,” she wrote.
Citing the Charlotte Lozier Institute, Miller highlighted that “abortions made up 97.1% of Planned Parenthood’s pregnancy services from 2021-2022, performing nearly 400,000 abortions.” She also underscored the crisis in her home state, noting, “In 2023, my home state of Illinois performed 72,143 abortions, the most in our history since the state started reporting abortion totals in 1973.” Miller laid bare Planned Parenthood’s financial empire, stating, “Due to a lack of decisive Congressional action, Planned Parenthood has become a federally funded health network with private assets valued at $2.5 billion. Recent numbers show that Planned Parenthood received nearly $700 million in taxpayer revenue from 2022-2023.”
Her letter concluded with a call to action: “It is essential that we protect taxpayer dollars and stop funding this organization. President Trump has already issued an Executive Order that implements such a plan. Therefore, I urge you to do everything possible to ensure Planned Parenthood never receives another penny of taxpayer dollars.”
Speaking to Breitbart, Miller doubled down, declaring, “Planned Parenthood is a multi-billion-dollar abortion business that continues to receive millions in federal funding.” She praised Trump’s leadership, stating, “President Trump had it right when he issued an Executive Order to cut off taxpayer dollars from abortion providers like Planned Parenthood,” and insisted, “it’s time for Congress to make that policy permanent. I urge the Energy and Commerce Committee to ensure that not another dime of American tax dollars goes to this murder-for-profit organization.”
The post House of Representatives Passes Bill to Defund Planned Parenthood appeared first on LifeNews.com.
-
Site: Mises InstituteProgressives have repeated the Malthus theme of overpopulation for six decades. However, the real demographic problem facing modern industrial nations has been the dearth of population growth fueled by an inflation culture.
-
Site: Zero HedgeThe Highest-Paying Industry In The US May Surprise You...Tyler Durden Thu, 05/22/2025 - 06:55
The U.S. is one of the highest-paying countries globally, but the average earnings differ significantly between industries.
This infographic, via Visual Capitalist's Niccolo Conte, ranks average annual salaries across major U.S. industries using data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics as of March 2025. The data covers private industries, and annual salary figures are estimated by multiplying average weekly earnings by 52.
Which Industries Pay the Most?
The average annual salary across all U.S. industries (ex. government employees) is around $64,000. In the utilities sector, the highest-paying industry, the average employee makes nearly $114,000 annually.
Here’s a look at the highest and lowest-paying industries in America:
The BLS updates earnings data on a monthly basis. The above figures are based on data from the March 2025 release.
The utilities sector includes occupations related to electric power generation, including wind turbine technicians and solar photovoltaic installers—the two fastest-growing jobs of the next decade.
The information industry, which includes all types of software and computer-related jobs, ranks second with nearly $100,000 in average annual earnings. It’s also among the most profitable industries for companies in America.
Mining/logging and financial activities have nearly equivalent average pay of just over $92,000 per year. Other well-paying industries include professional services, construction, wholesale trade, and manufacturing—each paying more than the $64,000 average across all industries.
On the other end of the wage spectrum, the leisure and hospitality sector has the lowest average salary of around $30,000 per year. The retail trade industry, the second-biggest by number of employees, is also among the lowest-paying with around $39,000 in average annual salary.
Which Industries Are Adding the Most Jobs?
Over the 12 months ended April 2025, the private education and health services industry added 894,000 jobs, with about 70% of these additions being in the healthcare segment.
The leisure and hospitality sector followed with 225,000 new jobs, followed by transportation and warehousing (151,000) and construction (143,000).
Employment in the public sector also increased by 322,000 employees, although the Federal government shed 6,000 jobs.
If you enjoyed this infographic, check out The Biggest Industries of 2040, on the Voronoi app.
-
Site: OnePeterFive
Author’s note: this article is a significant obiter dictum to the main series of articles linked above. The point it attempts to make is so important, based on the conclusions of part II, that it seems best to publish as a separate article. Part III will follow shortly. If you haven’t already, please read Part II before continuing to this section. No. First of all, a Catholic can save…
-
Site: Zero HedgeAlmost All 'Extreme' UK Temperature Highs Recorded At Junk Sites with Massive Possible ErrorsTyler Durden Thu, 05/22/2025 - 06:30
Authored by Chris Morrison via DailyScpetic.org,
Over the last few days the UK has experienced balmy spring weather with temperatures often settling in the low 20s Celsius. The Met Office has been out in force colouring the maps orange and declaring ‘extreme’ highs all over the green and pleasant land. Or more accurately, a remarkably few chosen spots across the g&p land. Net Zero promotion demands ever higher temperature recordings so only unnaturally heat-ravaged sites provide most of the daily records. I looked at the last nine days of Met Office records to Sunday May 18th and can reveal that nearly nine out of 10 local ‘extreme’ daily temperature highs were posted in junk Class 4 and super junk Class 5 sites with internationally-recognised ‘uncertainties’ of 2°C and 5°C respectively.
Certain locations crop up constantly in the records. In nine days the Scottish sites at Aboyne and Tyndrum recorded area highs eight and seven times respectively. In England, Coton-in-the-Elms recorded seven daily highs while Kielder Castle posted six. Of course the recording of highs in these corrupted sites didn’t mean the air temperature was representative of the wider surrounding area. It just meant that the sites were poorly located next to unnatural heat sources and were producing a false natural air record, recently re-badged by the Met Office as a so-called ‘extreme” high. Until the Met Office sorts out its largely junk-class 380-plus weather station network, these records and recordings are largely meaningless.
Every day the Met Office posts a daily high temperature for 16 locations around the UK. In the nine consecutive days under review, I initially found that 83.8% of the highs were recorded in Class 4 and 5 sites rated by the World Meteorological Organisation to have the large ‘uncertainties’ up to 5°C. No less than 36.6% of records came from Class 5 sites that have no qualifying criteria for accuracy and can be located anywhere. Quite how any Class 4 and 5 site can be used to calculate a national let alone a global temperature has long been a mystery, and their central use to promote the Net Zero fantasy is a scientific and political scandal. But I looked further into the claimed records and found the overall picture was even worse than it first appeared.
The above picture from Google Earth shows the location of the Kirkwall weather station marked in red. It is claimed to be a Class 2 site, a pristine rating with no ‘uncertainties’. The Met Office has very few of these Class 2 rated sites, with 78% of its stations to be found in the bottom two junk categories. But there is no way this is a Class 2 site. It is located at Kirkwall airport, barely 50 metres from what appears to be the aircraft park. Nearby buildings, car parks and roads provide ample opportunities for heat corruptions. Yet six times in the last nine days Kirkwall was said to hold the temperature record for Orkney and Shetland. I removed the supposedly ‘non-junk’ Kirkwall from the overall calculation with the result that no less than 87.4% of daily highs are in the junk classes.
Of course it beggars belief that on a large island comprising four different nations and wide variations in geographical locations the same old suspects keep recording the hottest daily temperatures. Was nowhere warmer for seven days in the East Midlands than Coton-in-the-Elms? What is so special about Kielder Castle that on six days it was hotter than everywhere else in North-East England? Should heat lovers in Northern Ireland and Wales move to Castlederg and Porthmadog respectively where they would have enjoyed five days of record highs? Scotland is often on the chilly side, so can we assume that house prices have a premium in Tyndrum, where in the nine days under review it only twice lost the highest temperature spot in the Central, Tayside and Fife region?
Earlier this month, citizen super sleuth Ray Sanders examined the central England Class 5 weather station at Coton-in-the-Elms and concluded: “There are worse sites … but not that many.”
Late last year, Science Feedback ‘fact checked’ articles published by both the Daily Sceptic and Ray Sanders detailing the junk status of most of the Met Office sites and its invention of temperature data from over 100 non-existent sites. Written largely by the Met Office, the ‘fact check’ suggested that stations rated internally as ‘Unsatisfactory’ did not meet the required standards for data validity, and recordings would not be used in the official records. A recent Freedom of Information request revealed that just 27 sites had been placed on the meteorological naughty step. As they used to say in the Wild West days of the City of London, self-regulation. like self-abuse, leads to exceedingly short sight. Nevertheless if the Met Office, marking its own homework, says the 27 sites are rubbish, who are we to argue?
It is therefore a surprise to see that Castlederg is on the ‘Unsatisfactory’ list and, as noted above, it produced a recent local record five days out of nine. It is possible the list has been updated in the last few months and Castlederg has been removed. It would be interesting to discover if it was on the list on July 21st 2021, when a Northern Ireland record temperature of 31.3°C was declared at the site. Other unsatisfactory sites quoted in the last few days include Redesdale Camp and Hawarden, the latter being a Class 4 airport location that holds the national temperature record for Wales set on July 21st 2021.
Why is all this relevant and important?
As we have shown many times at the Daily Sceptic, this super-heated data is fed into the mainstream to promote the political needs of Net Zero.
Just one example out of many saw Justin Rowlatt from the BBC reporting last July that climate change is dramatically increasing the frequency of “extreme” high temperatures in the UK, “new Met Office analysis has confirmed”. Rowlatt also observed that there had been a 40% increase in the number of “pleasant” days, defined as around 20°C. “These changes may sound positive,” wails the BBC activist-in-chief, “but the UK’s shifting climate represents a dangerous upheaval for our ecosystems as well as our infrastructure.”
* * *
Try IQ Biologix Astaxanthin - a super potent antioxidant (read more here).
Satisfaction guaranteed. Simply ask for a refund...
-
Site: Mises InstituteSales of previously owned homes in April declined 0.5% from March. That is the slowest April pace since 2009. Jobs and incomes aren't nearly as good as we've been told.
-
Site: Catholic ConclaveLeo XIV unites North and South America. Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Müller is convinced that he can bring the two continents closer together. And he will also be able to reach an understanding with US President Trump.The German Curial Cardinal Gerhard Ludwig Müller considers the election of Pope Leo XIV a fortunate coincidence given his biography. "It is, so to speak, providential that he unites the Catholic Conclavehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06227218883606585321noreply@blogger.com0
-
Site: Mises InstituteIn this lecture from the Mises Institute's recent Conference on War Revisionism, McMaken looks at how classical liberals' pro-peace foreign policy was defeated by a century of war propaganda beginning with the First World War.
-
Site: Real Investment Advice
When building a strong and diversified portfolio, most investors focus heavily on stocks. But bonds play an equally important role—especially when it comes to managing risk and providing consistent income. Incorporating bonds into your investment portfolio can lead to more stable investment strategies and long-term financial resilience.
Whether you’re just beginning to invest or looking to rebalance your asset allocation, understanding how bonds work and how to use them effectively is key to building a well-rounded portfolio.
Why Bonds Matter in Your Investment Portfolio
Bonds are debt securities issued by governments, municipalities, or corporations to raise capital. When you purchase a bond, you’re essentially lending money to the issuer in exchange for regular interest payments (called coupons) and the return of your principal at maturity.
Unlike stocks, which represent ownership and can be highly volatile, bonds provide more predictable returns. This stability can help cushion your portfolio during market downturns and reduce overall risk—making bonds an essential component of stable investment strategies.
Key benefits of bonds include:
- Capital preservation: Especially useful for investors nearing or in retirement.
- Income generation: Bonds pay fixed or variable interest, often semi-annually.
- Diversification: Bonds typically behave differently from stocks, helping to reduce portfolio volatility.
Types of Bonds: Government, Municipal, and Corporate
Not all bonds are created equal. Different types offer varying levels of risk, return, and tax implications.
Government Bonds
Issued by the U.S. Treasury, these include Treasury bills (T-bills), notes (T-notes), and bonds (T-bonds). They're considered the safest type of bond because they're backed by the U.S. government.
- Pros: Very low risk, exempt from state and local taxes.
- Cons: Lower returns compared to other types of bonds.
Municipal Bonds
Issued by states, cities, and other local government entities, these bonds help fund public projects like schools, roads, and infrastructure.
- Pros: Interest is often exempt from federal and possibly state/local income taxes.
- Cons: Slightly more risk than Treasury bonds depending on the issuing municipality’s credit rating.
Corporate Bonds
Issued by companies to raise capital. These offer higher yields but come with increased risk depending on the company’s creditworthiness.
- Pros: Higher potential returns.
- Cons: Greater default risk, may be affected by changes in business conditions or credit ratings.
How to Choose the Right Mix of Bonds
Choosing the right bond mix depends on your risk tolerance, time horizon, and income needs. A conservative investor may favor government bonds and municipal bonds for their safety and tax advantages, while someone with a higher risk appetite might include corporate bonds for greater yield.
Tips for selecting bonds:
- Evaluate the issuer’s credit rating.
- Consider duration—shorter-term bonds are less sensitive to interest rate changes.
- Look at the bond's yield compared to current inflation rates.
Understanding Bond Laddering
Bond laddering is a strategy where you purchase bonds with staggered maturity dates. As each bond matures, the proceeds can be reinvested into new bonds, creating a consistent stream of income and reducing interest rate risk.
Benefits of bond laddering:
- Helps manage reinvestment risk.
- Provides liquidity at regular intervals.
- Smooths out income and interest rate volatility over time.
How Interest Rates Affect Bond Investments
Interest rates and bond prices have an inverse relationship. When interest rates rise, existing bond prices fall (and vice versa). That’s because new bonds offer higher yields, making older bonds with lower rates less attractive.
This relationship is especially important when considering the timing of bond purchases and overall duration of your bond holdings. A financial advisor can help you manage interest rate exposure and align your bond strategy with your broader financial goals.
Let RIA Advisors Help You Build a Balanced Strategy
Bonds are more than just a conservative choice—they are a foundational part of any well-balanced portfolio. By understanding the types of bonds available, how they fit within your investment goals, and the strategies to manage them effectively, you can create a portfolio designed for growth, income, and stability.
Contact RIA Advisors today to schedule a consultation and explore how bonds can strengthen your investment strategy.
FAQs
What percentage of my portfolio should be in bonds?
This depends on your age, risk tolerance, and financial goals. A common rule of thumb is to subtract your age from 100 to determine your equity allocation, with the remainder in bonds.
Are bonds safe investments?
While no investment is without risk, government and high-quality municipal bonds are generally considered low-risk, especially compared to stocks.
What is the best time to invest in bonds?
Bonds can be a good investment in any market, especially during periods of stock market volatility or economic uncertainty. Timing may also depend on interest rate trends.
Can I lose money on bonds?
Yes. Bond prices can fall if interest rates rise or if the issuer defaults. However, holding bonds to maturity typically ensures you’ll get back your original investment (unless the issuer defaults).
What is a bond ladder?
A bond ladder is a strategy of buying bonds with staggered maturity dates to provide consistent income and reduce reinvestment and interest rate risk.
The post The Role of Bonds in a Well-Balanced Investment Portfolio appeared first on RIA.
-
Site: Crisis Magazine
A reporter recently asked U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, a practicing Catholic, how he reconciled the teachings of the Catholic Church with the Trump administration’s aggressive stance against illegal and mass migration. Rubio gave an interesting answer about the nature of mass migration, but he also insisted that “the pope is not a political figure.” This is the kind of answer that Catholic…
-
Site: Real Investment Advice
Fiscal worries, the dollar’s imminent demise, and soaring tariff-related inflation expectations are among the concerns driving bond yields higher. At the same time, inflation, the historical determinant of US Treasury yields, continues normalizing. As a bond investor, it is difficult to reconcile facts that argue for lower yields and narratives pointing in the opposite direction.
In all markets, narratives win the day. In other words, market narratives dictate short-term price behavior, whether correct or not. Sometimes, narratives persist for months or longer. Understanding the differences between the narratives and the fundamentals is critical for those trading and investing in bonds. That is a meaty topic. Accordingly, we will expand on it in our blog article next Wednesday.
In the meantime, the two graphs below provide a road map for the current bond situation.
The first graph shows the long-term relationship between 10-year UST yields and inflation, inflation expectations, and economic growth. Based on those factors, yields are 64 (4.58-3.94) basis points above fair value. Below it, the 10-year yield has been stuck in a 1.50% trading range for over two years. The bottom of the range is close to fair value, and the top of the range is 5%. Narratives can push yields higher. However, the 5% yield level should generate significant interest from long-term bond investors and protection from the Fed and/or Treasury.
What To Watch Today
Earnings
Economy
Market Trading Update
Yesterday, we discussed the market's technical overbought condition and trading an "unstoppable bull market" in stocks. (We will discuss that topic further in this weekend's #BullBearReport.) An important consideration concerning the recent market rally is Bob Farrell's Rule #9: "When all experts agree, something else tends to happen."
Notably, the same applies to every asset class, such as the bond market. As Michael Lebowitz noted above, bond market traders have all latched onto a theme of runaway deficits as the reason for the recent rise in rates. No matter where you look, every tick higher in rates as of late is associated with concerns over the debt and the deficit. However, as shown, the deficit is about 1/2 of the level it was in 2021. Nonetheless, the increase in the deficit, while it has been going on for 40-years, has become the latest topic to spark traders positioning against bonds.
In other words, as Michael notes, the "narrative" drives bond traders to make increasingly large short bets against bonds, pushing higher yields. As long as traders can control the narrative, they can control the price.
However, in the longer term, fundamentals will drive the price of yields. More importantly, the deficit narrative will collapse if economic growth strengthens due to deregulation, tax cuts, or other growth-inducing policies being implemented. Of course, we also can not rule out Central Bank intervention to lower yields to support the economy's health and the financial banking system. In other words, there is a high degree of probability that the narratives of today will fail to come to reality.
The technical backdrop also tells us that. In the longer term, like stocks, interest rates can only move so far before something happens, leading to a recessionary or event-driven outcome (lower yields as shown above). But technically, using a monthly chart for long-term analysis, bonds are at overbought levels that have only occurred four times previously. Each of those previous periods corresponded to the onset of an "event" and lower yields. Furthermore, the massive MACD sell signal also suggests lower yields will come, and given the tightening price channel on yields, a break below 4% currently will likely spark a good deal of short-covering in bonds, driving yields toward 3% or lower.
One important note is that this is a MONTHLY chart, so the analysis is VERY slow to move. Therefore, in the short term, days and weeks, yields will continue to be driven by the narrative. However, eventually, as is always the case, that "bearish narrative" will fail. When fundamentals regain control, there will be many traders caught with their "shorts down."
Inflation Narrative
Need we say any more about why yields are rising than sharing the graph below? Consumers expect that inflation will top the levels seen in 2022. While the graph below is certainly scary, there is little statistical evidence that consumers can accurately forecast inflation. To wit, expected inflation during 2021 and 2022 lagged actual inflation.
More importantly, inflation during 2021 and 2022 was the result of excessive stimulus, including checks sent directly to consumers and a crippled supply chain. We have neither of those circumstances today. Instead, fears of tariff-related inflation are the concern. While it's too early to gauge the impact tariffs will have on prices, thus far, we have seen CPI and PPI come in below expectations. We suspect that when inflation expectations start to turn back down, bond yields will follow.
Lastly, the second graph shows that inflation expectations have a significant political bias, further blurring how much we should read into consumer expectations.
Death Of The Dollar: An Eternal Tale
The following paragraph, courtesy of Amazon, reviews the book Death of the Dollar by William Rickenbacker.
Death of the Dollar by William F. Rickenbacker is a critical examination of the economic policies and monetary mismanagement that the author argues are eroding the value of the U.S. dollar and threatening financial stability. Rickenbacker contends that the actions of money managers, including excessive government spending, inflationary policies, and the detachment of the dollar from the gold standard, are systematically devaluing the currency. The book warns of an impending monetary disaster, highlighting how these policies disproportionately harm everyday citizens who rely on the dollar’s stability for savings and investments. Through a blend of economic analysis and historical context, Rickenbacker underscores the dangers of unchecked financial intervention and the potential for a collapse of the dollar’s purchasing power.
Plenty of books, articles, and social media posts herald the same grim forecast as Rickenbacker. For the most part, they rely on similar reasoning. Essentially, lax monetary policy and gross fiscal spending, both deemed to be inflationary, will result in dollar devaluation and ultimately the death of the dollar.
The difference between Rickenbacker’s book and other dollar demise forecasts is that Death of the Dollar was written in 1968!
Tweet of the Day
“Want to achieve better long-term success in managing your portfolio? Here are our 15-trading rules for managing market risks.”
Please subscribe to the daily commentary to receive these updates every morning before the opening bell.
If you found this blog useful, please send it to someone else, share it on social media, or contact us to set up a meeting.
The post Bond Yields Are Surging: Narratives Vs. Fundamentals appeared first on RIA.
-
Site: Crisis Magazine
Over a month ago, on the night of March 30, Jonathan Hoang disappeared from his house near Seattle. He’d gone upstairs to bed on Sunday evening, but when his mother went to wake him for school on Monday morning, he was gone. There are no known suspects yet. Jonathan is autistic, with the outlook and capacity of perhaps an eight-year-old, but he is chronologically 21, making the case harder to…
-
Site: Mises InstituteMassie is right, as usual. Most Republicans will vote for it anyway, and continue the US slide into bankruptcy.
-
Site: LES FEMMES - THE TRUTH
-
Site: AsiaNews.itToday's headlines:Gaza, at least 93 dead since yesterday; "warning shots" fired near foreign diplomats in Jenin. In North Korea, a technical incident damages a new warship, Kim: "a criminal act". Delhi, professor released on bail: under investigation for comments on the India-Pakistan conflict. Indonesian health minister criticised for unscientific claims.
-
Site: Rorate CaeliFrom an interview granted by Cardinal Goh, Archbishop of Singapore, to Bussola Quotidiana:Your Eminence, do you think you cardinals elected the right man? Yes, I think Leo XIV is exactly the pope the world needs at this time. Francis strengthened the missionary dimension of the Church, trying to bring the Gospel to all of humanity, including sinners, the marginalized, the vulnerable. New Catholichttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04118576661605931910noreply@blogger.com
-
Site: AsiaNews.itMirziyoyev plans to build a large shopping centre on the site where, in 2005, hundreds of protesters—who had occupied a high-security prison in protest against a wave of arrests—were killed in a military crackdown. For years, the authorities claimed that the demonstrators were 'slaughtered by Islamic terrorists.'
-
Site: Mises InstituteA stagnating economy means fewer vacations and less air travel. Airlines are feeling it.
-
Site: Rorate CaeliSt. Rita, OSA, with her patron Saints: Augustine, Nicholas of Tolentino OSA, John the Baptist "From the first, I have entrusted this Pope to the Mother of Good Counsel. "Today, I also entrust Leo to St Rita of Cassia on her feast day (22nd May): a patroness of 'impossible' causes and an Augustinian…*** Amen, Father. And it is all for a good cause, the best of causes.New Catholichttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04118576661605931910noreply@blogger.com
-
Site: Mundabor's blogI have just written about the grave sin of presumption in the papal tweet sent out yesterday. That was, as stated yesterday, a tweet. Black on white, but just a few lines, and possibly not sent out by Pope Leo personally or with his previous consent. Yesterday, 21 May, Pope Leo had his first general […]
-
Site: Zero HedgeNorway Bets Big On Offshore WindTyler Durden Thu, 05/22/2025 - 03:30
Authored by Michael Kern via OilPrice.com,
Norway announced on Monday a tender for three project areas for floating offshore wind in a highly-anticipated first competition for this type of renewable energy in the Nordic country.
The Norwegian Energy Ministry, which said earlier this year that it would bet on floating wind instead of fixed-bottom offshore wind, is now opening competition for project areas for offshore wind in Utsira Nord outside the coast of Rogaland off Norway’s southwest coast.
The installed capacity in each project area cannot exceed 500 megawatts (MW), according to the competition tender, in which applications for projects will be received until September 15, 2025.
Norway will subsidize the projects, for a total of $3.4 billion (35 billion Norwegian crowns) cap for state aid at Utsira Nord.
Winning bids will have two years to mature their projects and participate in an auction for state aid as a direct grant in 2028 or 2029.
The model for allocating project areas and government support – developed in dialogue with the offshore industry – is adapted to floating offshore wind and will contribute to both technology development and cost reductions for subsequent projects, Energy Minister Terje Aasland said in a statement.
Earlier this year, Norway scrapped plans to hold a fixed-bottom offshore wind tender at the Sørvest F offshore area in 2025, due to high costs to connect power to the grid.
Instead of fixed-bottom offshore wind at Sørvest F, the Norwegian government will prioritize floating wind in the tenders with radial links to the grid, the energy ministry said in February.
Norway’s floating wind tender comes as the global offshore wind industry continues to face significant headwinds relating to supply chain, regulatory, and macroeconomic developments.
Orsted, the world’s biggest offshore wind project developer, earlier this month warned of a continued challenging environment for the industry.
Due to higher costs and interest rates, the company announced it had decided to discontinue the development of the Hornsea 4 offshore wind project in the UK in its current form.
-
Site: Mises Institute
-
Site: Zero HedgeSpain's Socialist Govt Pours Taxpayers' Millions Into Equality Plan To Combat Nationalist SurgeTyler Durden Thu, 05/22/2025 - 02:45
Authored by Thomas Brooke via Remix News,
As nationalist parties surge across Europe, the Spanish Socialist-led government is doubling down on its ideological agenda — plowing over €140 million of taxpayer money into a nationwide equality plan aimed, in part, at combating what it labels “far-right” narratives among young men.
The move comes just days after significant gains for right-wing forces across the continent, including in neighboring Portugal, where the populist Chega party enjoyed electoral success to compete with the two dominant legacy parties, and in Poland, where the presidential race saw a majority of voters supporting conservative candidates.
Yet while many European electorates turn toward nationalist, traditionalist platforms, Spain’s Ministry of Equality has announced the distribution of €142.5 million to the country’s autonomous communities as part of its 2025 Co-Responsible Plan.
As reported by El Debate, the funding, which is 75 percent covered by the central government and 25 percent by regional administrations, will finance projects aimed at enforcing gender parity, redefining family life, and promoting what the government terms “co-responsible masculinities.”
Speaking after the Council of Ministers approved the latest round of funding, Equality Minister Ana Redondo explained that the Spanish government’s focus is “social transformation.”
The timing of the announcement has raised eyebrows, especially given Redondo’s remarks about the growing popularity of nationalist parties among young men. “It’s a concern of this government, in Europe, and a concern of society as a whole,” she said, describing online platforms as an environment where “hate, denialism, and anti-equality messages” are allegedly radicalizing young people against parties like hers and into the hands of populists.
Redondo warned that pornography and social media were fuelling “a misogynistic, sexist conception that devalues women,” which she claimed undermines both equality and democracy.
“All the policies of the Ministry are also aimed at facing this new reality,” she added.
Critics accuse the government of responding to rising disillusionment with its social agenda by funneling state money into programs that stigmatize dissenting views as extremism.
-
Site: Zero HedgeEnd Of An Era: Kurdish PKK Disbands After 4-Decade Fight Against TurkeyTyler Durden Thu, 05/22/2025 - 02:00
Authored by Christian Orr via The Epoch Times,
Some rather surprising (perhaps even “shocking” would be an appropriate adjective?) news emerged from Turkey on May 12: the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) declared its decision to disband and disarm, thus ending an insurgency campaign against the Turkish government that had begun on Aug. 15, 1984, and claimed the lives of over 40,000 people.
Leader Calls for Cease-Fire
As noted in a May 13 SOFX article:
“The decision came after PKK leader Abdullah Ocalan, who is serving a life sentence on an island near Istanbul, urged the group to disband. In March, the PKK declared a unilateral ceasefire in response to Ocalan’s call. ... In announcing its disbandment, the PKK, designated as a terrorist organization by Turkey, the EU, the U.K., and the U.S., said that it has ‘completed its historical mission’ and will ‘end the method of armed struggle.' ... The group added that, from now on, the Kurdish issue ‘can be resolved through democratic politics.’”
Erdogan and Other World Leaders React
Not surprisingly, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan welcomed the disbandment announcement, calling it an “important threshold” toward a “terror-free Turkey,” adding that the move opens the door to stronger democratic processes and political stability. Granted, one might be inclined to take Erdogan’s notion of “stronger democratic processes” with a grain of salt, given his well-known autocratic tendencies.
Meanwhile, to quote the SOFX piece again, “The United Nations called it a step toward peace while Syria’s foreign ministry called it a ‘pivotal moment’ for regional stability.”
True Terrorists, or Freedom Fighters?
The PKK has been designated a terrorist organization by Turkey, the European Union, and the United States alike.
There is the old adage—some would say “cliché”—that “One man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter,” and that saying is certainly applicable to the PKK. Indeed, the application of the “terrorist organization” label to the PKK is certainly not without its fair share of controversy. For example, both in 2008 and 2018, the Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the PKK was arbitrarily designated as a terror organization without due process; however, the EU as a whole has sustained the PKK’s terrorist classification in spite of those two rulings.
In addition, the U.S. State Department’s continued inclusion of the PKK on its Designated Foreign Terrorist Organizations list—which has been in place since October 1997—might be a tad surprising at first glance in light of America’s longstanding friendship with the Iraqi Kurds (as exemplified by the alliance between the U.S. military and the Kurdish peshmerga in the overthrow of then-Iraqi strongman Saddam Hussein during the 2003 Iraq War). But then again, since Turkey at least ostensibly remains America’s ally in NATO, notwithstanding the tensions between Washington and the Erdogan regime, perhaps this is not so surprising.
Labeling controversies aside, the PKK began its insurgency seeking an independent Kurdish state, but gradually shifted its focus to securing more autonomy and rights for Turkey’s Kurdish population, which comprises roughly 20 percent of the country’s total populace.
Historical Analogies and Precedents
As far as I can recall and ascertain, the last time a major freedom fighter/guerrilla/insurgent/terrorist group dissolved so suddenly after such a long conflict was back in May 2009. That was when the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam, often referred to as simply the Tamil Tigers, formally surrendered to the Sri Lankan Army and the latter’s Sinhalese majority-dominated government, thus ending a civil war that had ravaged that South Asian island nation since July 1983 (coincidentally just over a year before the PKK began its own armed struggle).
Going back in time an additional 11 years from the Tamil Tigers’ surrender, there was the Good Friday Agreement, a.k.a. the Belfast Agreement, signed on April 10, 1998, which officially ended “The Troubles” between the UK government and the Provisional Irish Republican Army (a.k.a. the “Provos”) in Northern Ireland. Though semantically speaking, one doesn’t typically see or hear the word “surrender” used in reference to the Provos’ acquiescence to this accord—and indeed, their political wing, Sinn Féin, remains to this day—the fact remains that the Irish militant group formally announced the end of its campaign of violence in July 2005.
The Way Forward?
It is still unclear what reward or concession (if any) Mr. Ocalan—who has been serving his sentence since 1999—and his supporters might receive in return for disbanding, though there is some speculation that he could be granted parole (assuming, of course, that President Erdogan is willing and able to grant that sort of forbearance and magnanimity).
Time will tell if the new Turkish Kurdistan “peace” (assuming it’s not too early to use that word in this instance) will hold steady over the long term like it has in Sri Lanka and Northern Ireland. “Inshallah,” as some might say.
-
Site: The Unz ReviewIn standard western economic textbooks, state planning and market competition are mutually exclusive. Thatcher and Reagan brought western capitalism into the neoliberal phase by claiming “Government is not the answer. Government is the problem”, putting market fundamentalism on the altar. On the other side, Soviet central planning proved rigid and wasteful, leading to the eventual...
-
Site: The Unz ReviewAn English couple, an American couple and a Ukrainian couple were dining in a high-end restaurant. The Englishman asks his wife: “Could you pass me the honey, honey?” A little later, the American asks his wife: “Could you pass me the sugar, sugar?” Upon seeing this, the Ukrainian says to his wife: “Pass me the...
-
Site: The Unz ReviewPolling data clearly shows that Americans prefer capitalism over socialism. In fact, it's not even close. A 2021 Gallup survey found that 60% of Americans view capitalism positively, while only 38% felt the same about socialism. A 2025 Rasmussen/Heartland poll reported an even bigger disparity, with an impressive 71% saying they prefer free-market economics over...
-
Site: The Unz ReviewFrom Ken Klippenstein’s (highly recommended) Substack. Klippenstein is a serious professional journalist who vets his sources, with a solid track record, so we can accept this as authentic. -KB Explication by Elias Rodriguez May 20, 2025 Halintar is a word that means something like thunder or lightning. In the wake of an act people look...
-
Site: The Unz ReviewEver since I expressed my skepticism about the secret world government run by the Satan-Worshipping Pedophiles (SWP), I am cautioned, by those who know better, that “the greatest trick of the Devil is to convince us that he doesn’t exist” (an approximate quote from French poet Baudelaire). Marvel of unfalsifiability! Disbelief in the Devil’s existence...
-
Site: AntiWar.comWho could have imagined 19 months ago that it would take more than a year and a half of Israel slaughtering and starving Gaza’s children for the first cracks to appear in what has been a rock-solid wall of support for Israel from western establishments. Finally, something looks like it may be about to give. … Continue reading "Why the Wall of Silence on the Gaza Genocide Is Finally Starting To Crack"
-
Site: The Unz ReviewSebastian Gorka has been a US citizen for only 12 years, and he is Deputy Assistant to President Trump and Senior Director for Counterterrorism. Immigrant-invaders along with Zionists now determine US war policies. Putin’s desire for a Great Power Agreement makes it easy for Washington to again walk him down the garden path to another...
-
Site: The Unz ReviewIt is amazing how difficult it is for the Western foreign policy community and media to recognize and acknowledge facts. Generally speaking, analysts who tell you the difference between the truth and the narrative are brushed aside. All sorts of dismissive names are applied to us few, and false narratives serving agendas prevail. Policymakers themselves...
-
Site: The Unz ReviewWestern capitals are still coordinating with Israel and the US on their ‘criticisms’ of the genocide – just as they earlier coordinated on their support for the slaughter After 19 months of being presented with dissembling accounts of Gaza from their governments, western publics are now being served up a different – but equally deceitful...
-
Site: AntiWar.comThe hatred of some in Israel for the people of Gaza – even for little children – is just astounding. If they have even a tiny bit of belief in God, they should pray for forgiveness. Unfortunately, NPR reported last Thursday (May 15) on “deadly airstrikes, killing more than 150 people in the past day, … Continue reading "Israeli Hatred for Children in Gaza Is Shocking"
-
Site: Zero HedgeCCP, Russia, Iran Collaborating With Cartels To Smuggle Fentanyl Into US Through Canada: FBI DirectorTyler Durden Wed, 05/21/2025 - 23:25
Authored by Jennifer Cowan via The Epoch Times,
FBI Director Kash Patel says the flow of fentanyl into the United States is coming from his country’s northern neighbour. He says China, Russia, and Iran are partnering with cartels to smuggle the drug into the United States via Vancouver.
Patel told Fox News that the Chinese Communist Party and the regimes in Russia and Iran are responsible for the influx of fentanyl pouring into his country. He said hostile regimes like Beijing, Tehran, and Moscow are collaborating with criminal organizations to smuggle fentanyl across the Canada-U.S. border following President Donald Trump’s sealing of America’s southern border with Mexico.
“They’re sailing around to Vancouver and coming in by air,” Patel said during an interview with Fox News host Maria Bartiromo that aired on May 18. The FBI is focused on fentanyl coming across the border and calling on state and local law enforcement partners to address the issue, he said, also noting that the Canadian government needs to do more.
“You know who has to step in? It’s Canada, because they’re making it up there and shipping it down here,” he said.
“I don’t care about getting into this debate of making someone the 51st state or not, but they are our partner in the north. And say what you want about Mexico, but they helped us seal the southern border. The facts speak for themselves.”
With Vancouver being identified by the FBI as a problem area, B.C. Conservative MLA and public safety critic Elenore Sturko is calling on Premier David Eby’s NDP government to implement a provincial fentanyl strategy, appoint a bipartisan provincial drug task force on drug trafficking, and launch two public inquiries.
“The FBI has issued a warning to Canada to prepare in the event that we see an increase in the production of fentanyl and other deadly drugs as a result of American enforcement on their southern border with Mexico,” she said in a video posted on social media on May 18. “This shouldn’t come as a surprise to Canada, because we know that between 2023 and 2024, Canada saw an increase in the number of gangs and cartels and terrorist organizations doing business here in Canada, primarily in Ontario and in British Columbia.”
A 2024 report from Criminal Intelligence Service Canada (CISC) indicated that participation of Canada-based organized crime groups in fentanyl-related activities has increased by 42 percent since 2019.
There are 235 criminal organizations engaged in fentanyl-related activities, with 35 of these groups participating in the export of domestically manufactured drugs like fentanyl and methamphetamine, according to the report.
Sturko said immediate action should be taken by the B.C. government to deal with the fentanyl issue.
“It’s never been more important for us to take action on illicit drug production in British Columbia,” she said.
B.C.’s Minister of Public Safety and Solicitor General Garry Begg has said that his government is expanding police resources and “intelligence-led” enforcement to fight drug trafficking.
“Just this past October [2024,] RCMP federal drug policing dismantled the largest fentanyl and methamphetamine superlab in Canadian history, preventing over 95 million lethal doses of this drug flooding our streets. This is the kind of action that saves lives,” Begg said in the B.C. legislature in February. “We will continue to support enforcement crackdowns on drug traffickers and bad actors wherever they may be in British Columbia.”
Drug Concerns
The comments from Patel and Sturko come just days after the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) released its 2025 National Drug Threat Assessment, which links Mexican transnational criminal organizations (TCOs)—including international drug cartels and other violent criminal groups—to the fentanyl supply in the United States.
The law enforcement agency says Mexican cartels are capitalizing on the relative ease of the production of synthetic drugs compared with traditional plant-based drug production to generate immense revenues, primarily sourcing the necessary precursor chemicals from China and India. They maintain a “complex and robust” network—couriers, border tunnels, and stash houses—to smuggle all of the major illicit drugs into the United States via air and maritime cargo as well as overland traffic, the DEA said.
Canada was named in the DEA report as a destination point for shipments of precursor chemicals as well as a source of “growing concern” due to “elevated synthetic drug production” occurring there, particularly from sophisticated fentanyl “super laboratories” such as the type seized by the RCMP in B.C. in October 2024.
The production of fentanyl and its illicit smuggling across borders by Canadian criminal organizations has been a point of contention between the United States and Canada for several months.
Trump levied 25 percent tariffs on Canadian products not covered under the countries’ free-trade agreement USMCA, as well as a 10 percent levy on Canadian energy products, saying that Canada must do more on border security to curb the flow of illegal immigrants and drugs flowing into the United States.
White House senior adviser Peter Navarro has said the tariffs were implemented because “the president is fighting a drug war,” while dismissing accusations that his country was launching a trade war against Canada.
Canada has earmarked $1.5 billion to boost border security since Trump first threatened tariffs and, at his request, has also appointed a “fentanyl czar” to oversee a Canada–U.S. Joint Strike Force and named a list of fentanyl cartels as terrorists.
The Prime Minister’s Office said in January that less than 0.2 percent of fentanyl seized by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) comes from Canada.
According to the DEA’s 2025 National Drug Threat Assessment report, as of spring 2025, 22.7 kilograms of Canada-sourced fentanyl were seized at the Canada-U.S.border in 2024, compared to 9,354 kilograms seized at the U.S.-Mexico border.
Precursor Chemicals
But China analysts say the statistics on northern border drug seizures do not account for the Beijing-linked fentanyl precursor operations that are based in Canada.
“It doesn’t have to be that border services at the U.S. [bust] a big load of finished fentanyl,” author and investigative journalist Sam Cooper told The Epoch Times in a previous interview. “What is key here is that the precursors are coming into Canada and being shipped elsewhere, and the money laundering is being directed from Canada.”
Once these precursor chemicals are brought into the country, they predominantly find their way to superlabs located across Canada, especially in the Western provinces. “Superlabs” is the term used by the RCMP to describe the clandestine synthetic drug production facilities, which are “large-scale, highly organized labs generally tied to organized crime where drugs are produced for the purpose of wholesale trafficking.”
Federal investigators in British Columbia said they dismantled the “largest, most sophisticated” drug-production lab in Canadian history last fall, dealing what they described as a “decisive blow” to a major transnational organized crime group operating in the province.
Pacific Region RCMP Assistant Commissioner David Teboul said officers seized a combination of precursor chemicals and finished fentanyl products that could have amounted to 95.5 million potentially lethal doses of fentanyl.
Several million more “potentially lethal doses of fentanyl” were seized by the B.C. RCMP in March after investigators dismantled three synthetic drug labs in the province. All three labs have been tied to transnational organized crime groups based in British Columbia.
The police said it was not known where the drugs would have been shipped, but a June 2024 briefing note by Global Affairs Canada said that past seizures of Canada-sourced fentanyl have occurred in places like the United States and Australia.
The report identified China as the largest source country for illegal fentanyl and chemical precursors exported to Canada and North America since 2015.
-
Site: Zero HedgeWhat Are The Most Popular Baby Names In The US?Tyler Durden Wed, 05/21/2025 - 23:00
Olivia, Emma and Amelia have been announced as the three most popular baby names for girls in the U.S., while for boys, Liam, Noah and Oliver were parents' favorites.
This is according to the U.S. Social Security Administration’s annual list of the most popular baby names in the United States.
According to the institution, Statista's Anna Fleck reports that the list, released earlier this month, is based on applications for Social Security cards, which are submitted at the time of birth.
Olivia and Liam have held the top spots for the past six consecutive years. The third position has shown slightly more variation since 2015, with the appearance of Amelia, Charlotte, Ava and Sophia for girls, as well as William and Mason for boys.
You will find more infographics at Statista
Other girls' names that featured in the top 10 last year were Charlotte, Mia, Sophia, Isabella, Evlyn and Ava. For boys, they were James, Genry, Mateo, Elijah, Lucas and William.
In 2024, the names with the biggest changes in popularity were Truce for a boy, which rose from rank 12,109 in 2023 to 991 in 2024 and Ailany for a girl, which rose from rank 855 to 101.
Truce is an Old English name meaning “peace”, while Ailany is believed to be derived from the Hawaiian name Ailani, which means “chief”.
In total, 3.61 million babies were born in the U.S. in 2024, up from 3.59 million in 2023.
-
Site: Zero HedgeThe KGB Spy Who Predicted Our FutureTyler Durden Wed, 05/21/2025 - 22:35
Authored by Adam Sharp via DailyReckoning.com,
My dear friends, I think you are in very big trouble. Whether you believe it or not, YOU ARE AT WAR. And you may lose this war very soon together with all your affluence and freedoms unless you start defending yourselves.
–Yuri Bezmenov, 1984
In 1970, a Soviet KGB agent named Yuri Bezmenov defected to the West. His story is fascinating. Yuri shared key details on how USSR propaganda and subversion worked.
But first we need to discover why Yuri came over to the West…
Since the 1960s, Yuri had been stationed in India. His cover assignment was as a journalist for the Novosti Press Agency.
But his real job as a KGB agent was to influence policymakers, academics, and journalists. Yuri’s mission was to infect these targets with Marxist-Leninist ideology.
He planted stories about how benevolent and fair the USSR was. He charmed diplomats and politicians with vodka (and less tasteful means). He planted stories to discredit the United States.
He built relationships with influential Indians with a goal of shaping the narrative around the Soviet Union. He worked with students, recruiting future Indian leaders to study in Moscow and Saint Petersburg.
His job was to corrupt both individuals and institutions.
Eventually Yuri became disillusioned with his work. He realized that his efforts were actively harming the Indian people, whom he had become quite attached to.
So he decided to defect to the West. He disguised himself as an American hippie, and joined one of the wandering groups of backpackers which frequented India at the time.
Yuri slipped his Soviet handlers and made his way to the American embassy. They granted him asylum, and he was debriefed by the CIA and FBI.
Lessons in Ideological Subversion
Once in North America, Yuri Bezmenov changed his name to Tomas Schuman and worked as a producer for the Canadian Broadcasting Company (CGC). Ironically, part of his job was now to target Russian-speaking countries with Western views.
Yuri wrote books and lectured all over North America, warning that if the United States didn’t guard its values closely, they would be overwhelmed by the same type of social warfare he used in India.
Bezmenov described this process as “ideological subversion”. He claimed that 85% of the KGB counterintelligence budget was used to subvert countries. Less than 15% of KGB spending was on the cloak-and-dagger stuff we see in movies.
The USSR ran the same playbook in countless countries, and Yuri warned Americans that we were now the primary target.
He explained that ideological subversion generally has 4 stages.
-
Demoralization (15-20 year process) – begin to undermine a society’s values, religion, and institutions.
-
Destabilization (2-5 years) – encourage political polarization, unrest, inflation.
-
Crisis (sudden but with lasting effects) – enacting change by taking advantage of a major destabilizing event such as war or economic crisis.
-
Normalization (indefinite) – The now authoritarian and demoralized society becomes normal to citizens, and they barely notice its negative aspects.
Yuri said that it takes 15-20 years to demoralize a nation because that’s how long it takes to propagandize one generation with socialist ideals.
Bezmenov also said that once someone is subverted, it is extremely difficult to reverse the process. You can show them all the factual information you want, but it won’t change their views. They have become completely demoralized.
I would argue that America’s crisis stage was 9/11. It was a war combined with an economic collapse. Interestingly, this date also coincides with America’s declining religiosity. In 2000, 68% of Americans reported belonging to a church, synagogue, temple, or mosque. Today it’s just 45%.
Source: Gallup
Americans of all religions have been losing faith. Yuri predicted this. Disrupting a country’s religious values is a key part of the subversion playbook. However, we’re beginning to see signs of a religious reawakening. Many of my kids’ friends have actually encouraged their parents to join a church, which is a positive sign.
If you can’t guess, we are still in the midst of the normalization stage. However, Americans do finally appear to be waking up.
The only thing that will wake fully demoralized people from their slumber is a “kick in the balls” as Yuri said. In other words, conditions have to get bad before the brainwashed population wakes up. We’re reaching that stage now and I suspect we’ll hit the tipping point over the next decade.
Set in Motion Long Ago
To be clear, modern Russia is not actively subverting America. This plan was set in motion many decades ago during the peak of the cold war with the USSR.
Subversion is a “set it and forget it” type of operation. Once you influence one generation, the effect is self-perpetuating (up to a point).
It’s a disturbingly brilliant form of warfare. Silent, effective, and cheap.
Fortunately, there is a way out of demoralization. Yuri encouraged Americans to vote conservative, and basically said the only way out is through strong right-wing leaders. We have that in Donald Trump, and his return to the Presidency is a good sign for the country.
The left tried everything to prevent the re-election of Donald J. Trump. Fake criminal charges, lawsuits, slander, and more. Yet Americans saw through the lies. This is encouraging.
Additionally, young Americans are increasingly conservative. The old demoralized political left is withering away. Their appeal amongst young voters has plummeted, and the DNC is rudderless.
Our country will get out of this demoralized phase in time. We’ve already made good progress over the past decade and this should continue.
For those who wish to learn more, here are my favorite interviews, books, and lectures featuring Yuri Bezmenov:
-
Socialist Subversion Explained (Youtube)
-
Full Interview with G. Edward Griffin (Youtube)
-
A Love Letter to America (PDF)
-
1983 Lecture on Subversion (Youtube)
-
-
Site: Zero HedgeFew Americans Enjoy Using AITyler Durden Wed, 05/21/2025 - 22:10
Tools using artificial intelligence, such as ChatGPT, are only liked by 22 percent of Americans in their everyday lives.
This places the country towards the bottom of the ranking when compared to other nations, reports Statista's Katharina Buchholz according to a survey by Statista Consumer Insights shows.
You will find more infographics at Statista
In India, almost every second respondent said they enjoyed using AI tools, while in China and Spain, the number is still just over one in three.
ChatGPT and other AI tools are least popular in Japan, where only 10 percent of respondents said they were excited about using AI software in their everyday lives.
The popularity of AI software is also low in Italy (20 percent).
The chatbot was developed by the U.S. software company OpenAI.
These findings align with data from Ipsos, which found that Asia as a region has higher levels of enthusiasm about a future with AI. Ipsos also asked respondents how much they knew about AI products and services, finding that this self-claimed knowledge was highest in Asia, with China (81 percent), Indonesia (80 percent) and Thailand (69 percent) topping the list.
In terms of consumer products, artificial intelligence refers to the simulation and automation of intelligent behavior. AI in general is used in a wide variety of fields, such as the development of voice assistants, industrial robots and medicine.
The field of autonomous driving also falls within this category. Forecasts predict that global revenues in the field of artificial intelligence will continue to grow in the coming years.
-
Site: Zero HedgeFrugality Rules As Americans Start Making The Most In A Hand-Me-Down MarketTyler Durden Wed, 05/21/2025 - 21:45
Authored by Allan Stein via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),
PHOENIX—While many retailers have struggled, business has thrived since Estefania Gasca and her husband, Cristobal Zepeda, established Thrift It Forward consignment store in Phoenix nearly two years ago.
Deborah Locker, an employee at Christian Family Care Thrift Store in Phoenix, Ariz., stands behind the sales counter on May 1, 2025. Allan Stein/The Epoch Times
Some days, the second-hand goods sell as quickly as they come in.
The couple has learned to appreciate the intrinsic value of old things, as second-hand resale and “do-it-yourself” repairs grow in popularity.
Gasca views it as a gradual paradigm shift—a new way of living based on old-school thinking.
“I feel like people are being more frugal. I feel that people are resorting more to buying second-hand rather than new,” said Gasca, standing behind the check-out counter on May 1.
“I feel like we haven’t experienced a [major] change just yet.”
COVID-19 revealed weaknesses in supply chains, resulting in empty store shelves and foreshadowing potentially worse situations due to global trade conflicts and import tariffs.
If it’s broken, second-hand tools can fix it as fine as new, Gasca said.
Used electronics, such as old gaming systems, computers, and digital devices, are among her best-selling products. They provide good quality at a significantly lower cost than large retail stores.
However, Gasca told The Epoch Times she is worried about the current unstable economy, which could lead to problems with pricing and availability, even for resellers like Thrift It Forward.
Deborah Locker, an employee at Christian Family Care Thrift Store in Phoenix, Ariz., goes over prices on May 1, 2025. Allan Stein/The Epoch Times
“We buy all of our stuff. We don’t get any donations,” Gasca said. “I’m afraid people will start selling more expensively. It will affect our prices. The [profit] margins won’t be as good.”
That means that thrift, budget, and consignment stores will have to start selling inventory at higher prices, undermining the purpose of buying second-hand items.
“We want to push reasonable prices because we know the economy is not as good,” Gasca said.
However, “we don’t want to raise our prices,” and there are indications that more challenging times may lie ahead.
If there’s a silver lining, Gasca said, Americans are becoming less wasteful and more practical with their personal belongings.
Hand-Me-Down World
Gasca said the country should be more self-sustainable. “We are a big throw-away society.”
“I feel a lot of people are coming in to buy [second-hand] as opposed to buying brand new, trying to keep their costs down,” she said.
“Automotive mechanics come to see us. We focus heavily on tools because there are a lot of fix-it-yourself people. Things go [fast].”
A sign shows assorted clothing marked at $5 at the Christian Family Care Thrift Store in Phoenix, Ariz., on May 1, 2025. Allan Stein/The Epoch Times
According to research by Capital One Shopping, between 16 percent and 18 percent of Americans shop at thrift stores annually, visiting more than 25,000 resale, consignment, and nonprofit resale shops across the United States.
Of these consumers, 93 percent primarily shop online, with bargain hunters spending an average of $1,760 a year on second-hand items.
In 2023, the U.S. second-hand market generated $53 billion in revenue, projected to grow to $73 billion by 2028, according to Capital One’s research.
During this period, the clothing resale sector has grown 15 times faster than the overall retail apparel industry and should continue expanding at an annual rate of 17 percent through 2028.
The most commonly thrifted items include clothing (67 percent), books (60 percent), furniture (49 percent), shoes (36 percent), and toys (29 percent).
‘Planned Resilience’
At the Christian Family Care Thrift Store in Phoenix, volunteer cashier Deborah Locker has noticed an increasing interest in recycling old items, commonly known as “thrifting.”
She sees it as a logical progression in a throw-away society, and people are often surprised by the quality of second-hand items.
“We got a new Prada purse yesterday,” which usually retails for hundreds of dollars, and now is selling at a fraction of the cost, Locker told The Epoch Times.
Estefania Gasca, co-owner of Thrift It Forward consignment store in Phoenix, Ariz., adjusts items on a shelf on May 1, 2025. Allan Stein/The Epoch Times
With other items, they will say, “What a bargain! It would have cost me $60, but I got it for $20.”
“I’ve seen more information on thrifting on the internet lately,” Locker said. “They’re in my news feeds.”
As global trade encounters increasing disruptions, Locker envisions a domestic economy focused less on planned obsolescence and more on planned resilience.
Locker said she tries to be a good steward of the world’s resources, not a “throw-away” person.
Thrifting is one way of expressing that conviction.
It often involves do-it-yourself repairs, and Marlina Kessler, co-owner of Bernina Connection in Phoenix, believes that knowing how to sew and mend clothes is an essential skill for the 21st century.
The sewing shop offers classes specializing in Bernina sewing machines, regarded as the Mercedes-Benz of the industry, along with fabrics and quilting supplies.
At the top of the sewing machine sales line is the B735 computerized patchwork edition, which sells for around $8,000.
“It’s amazing. I tell people it’s like a CNC machine that sews instead of cuts [metal],” Kessler said.
Kessler is primarily a garment “sewist” rather than a traditional quilter.
When she purchased the shop, established in 2002, she leaned more toward fabric sales and garment repair.
With rising prices and a renewed interest in extending the lifespan of clothing, Kessler believes that “fast fashion” is declining.
Fast fashion refers to the rapid and inexpensive production of trendy clothing that saturates the market. This phenomenon goes hand in hand with a culture of disposability.
Kessler said that this is where sewing and mending skills truly shine.
“We do a lot of classes. I’ve got a 23-year-old son, and he is much more aware than I ever was at that age about our environment, things that are just disposable,” Kessler said.
“I think the newer generation is placing much more value in sustainable things, creating clothing, and getting good products.”
New Life From Old Clothes
Purchasing second-hand items gives new life to old fabrics and reduces the cost of alterations, Kessler said.
“These bundles here are made from vintage quilts,” she said, pointing to a set of fabrics.
“And people will use that for what they call visible mending. They‘ll make their patches. Sometimes, they’ll stitch and elaborate, making them look cute.”
Currently, students in the Bernina Connections sewing classes are learning how to “upcycle,” which involves creatively reusing fabrics.
At the same time, Kessler knows that many of her suppliers are worried about import tariffs and the potential increase in wholesale prices.
“Our machines are going up in price across the board. We’re going to try to absorb as much of it so that we don’t see that [passed on] to the consumer,” Kessler told The Epoch Times.
When it comes to clothing, Kessler is practical and thinks long-term.
Why spend $100 on a new pair of fashion slacks or denim jeans when you can fix the ones you have for much less?
Why choose a shirt that lasts only a couple of years when you can repair one and make it last a decade or more?
Kessler said there’s pride in mending and creating clothing and value in keeping things longer.
Buying new items means spending a lot of money in some cases, constantly. And in the garment industry, there are certain immutable realities.
One is, “You’re always going to need to take up or let out your slacks,” Kessler said.
“You’re always going to need to shorten tops. It used to be so easy to say, ‘Oh, I’ve got a hole in my jeans, I’ll just go and buy a new pair.’
“Now, that option is more difficult. So we do classes on how to patch them up.”
For thrift store customer Sara Stafford of Phoenix, it’s all about product longevity and finding treasures “wherever you are.”
She is not very concerned about import tariffs at the moment.
“I think it’s going to build back up soon, especially with the small businesses,” Stafford said.
“And if we give back to our small businesses, it will be booming again.”
-
Site: Zero HedgeBibi Defiant, Unfazed: 'All Of Gaza Will Be Under Israel's Control'Tyler Durden Wed, 05/21/2025 - 21:20
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has remained defiant and came out swinging in a Wednesday press conference amid growing international isolation and pressure, even from allies.
He declared at a press conference in Jerusalem that Israel will control all of Gaza when the military offensive ends, and this remains the ultimate goal - to fully and finally crush Hamas.
Via Reuters
Netanyahu described that it was days ago, upon the approval of Operation Gideon’s Chariots - the greatly expanded ground offensive in Gaza - that he made the decision to initiate the next stage of the war.
He asserted that "At the end of this campaign, all of the territories of the Gaza Strip will be under Israel’s security control."
However, he did also say that "If there is an option for a temporary ceasefire to free hostages, we’ll be ready" - this after calling back Israeli negotiators from Doha this week.
He further said in the televised news conference, which was his first since December, that "We must avoid a humanitarian crisis in order to preserve our freedom of operational action."
Shortly after the address, regional headlines cited that dozens of aid trucks entered the Gaza Strip, which marks the end of an 80-day cutoff, and after intense pressure from allies to let aid flow, and amid fears of famine gripping the Palestinian population.
The BBC observed that Netanyahu's tone was one of defiance and defensiveness:
Benjamin Netanyahu was in defensive mode, sticking to his guns and unfazed by critics - foreign and domestic - of his decision to step up the war in Gaza.
Operation Gideon's Chariots is intended to “complete the war, the job”, said the Israeli Prime Minister at a rare press conference tonight to which only Israeli media were invited.
Despite recent reports this week that President Trump is "frustrated" with Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister believes he still has Washington's full backing:
Despite growing calls from Israel’s European allies to end the war and address Gaza’s dire humanitarian needs, as long as he has the backing of the United States to continue the war in Gaza, Netanyahu indicated he will not change tack.
He said that his controversial aid plan for Gaza, which would bypass existing UN structures and facilities, would give Israel “another tool to win the war”. It’s a plan that has been widely condemned by the UN and foreign governments as akin to “weaponizing food aid”.
Bibi vs. the world...
BREAKING: Netanyahu: “I stand alone against the world — even against the self-haters in the Knesset — and I will not surrender. We will defeat Hamas.” pic.twitter.com/9FkUUyGxYv
— daniel (@LionsOfZion_ORG) May 21, 2025"The president [Trump] is frustrated about what is happening in Gaza. He wants the war to end, he wants the hostages to come home, he wants aid to go in and he wants to start rebuilding Gaza," one White House official said to Axios.
Yet, the reality is that US arms flow has shown no signs of slowing, nor has the billions in annual foreign aid doled out to Tel Aviv. Western leaders will likely continue their largely symbolic hand-wringing and expressions of 'frustration' - but nothing is likely to fundamentally change regarding the Israeli military's trajectory at this point. Gaza is being turned into a parking lot, essentially.
-
Site: Zero HedgeJohn Stewart Is Right...Tyler Durden Wed, 05/21/2025 - 20:55
Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity.news,
Every now and then John Stewart says something that undeniably hits the nail on the head, and he’s done it again while commenting on the renewed Biden cognitive decline and cancer saga.
In a Daily Show segment Stewart said of the cancer diagnosis “Maybe it is another cover-up. I don’t f***ing know. If they came out and said, yeah, Biden knew about it five years ago, I wouldn’t be shocked.”
He continued, “If they came out and said Biden found out on Friday, I wouldn’t be shocked. And I understand the excitement over an insidious Democratic cover-up about Joe Biden’s mental decline. The thing is, though, it was a terrible cover-up.”
“Because we all f***ing knew. All of us knew. There was no cover-up.”
He’s right.
Everyone with eyes and half a brain knew Biden was out of it and that his entire presidency was fake and scripted.
Stewart continued, “Poll after poll showed vast majorities of the public thought Biden was too old and too out of it to run again.”
“And that’s what’s so hilarious about politicians,” he further urged, emphasising “The cover-up doesn’t work when everyone knows you’re lying… the tell is when you’re so over the top about what you don’t want to tell the truth about.”
Stewart also absolutely seared CNN grifter Jake Tapper for suddenly developing a conscience and desire to report the truth now he has written it down in a book he wants the public to buy.
“How fucking weird it is that the news is selling you a book about news they should’ve told you was news a year ago … for free,” Stewart brayed.
* * *
Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.
-
Site: Zero HedgeBoys Targeted With Investigation After Complaining About Trans Student In School Locker RoomTyler Durden Wed, 05/21/2025 - 20:30
In 2021 Loudon County Schools in Virginia were implementing DEI policies that allowed for trans students to use the bathrooms and locker rooms of their preferred gender. The institutional decision to let trans students essentially do whatever they please regardless of safety concerns led to an incident in May of that year in which a trans girl (boy pretending to be a girl) sexually assaulted a female student in a school bathroom.
The Loudon case sparked a national firestorm, not just because of the rape (which the boy was eventually convicted of), but because of the reported attempts by school officials to cover up the attack.
The teen perpetrator was found criminally responsible for two counts of sodomy in the May 28 incident at Stone Bridge High School and a separate incident on Oct. 6 at Broad Run High School after he was transferred to that school. He was placed on supervised probation in a locked juvenile treatment facility until his 18th birthday.
According to court documents from the civil suit case, the victim claimed the Loudoun County Public Schools system failed to protect her when she reported the sexual assault to leaders at the high school, who did not follow Title IX protocols. The filing claimed that the school tried to avoid reporting the assault to the Loudoun County Sheriff’s Office and a guidance counselor refused to talk about the sexual assault at first, calling in the victim’s parents because she had been “beaten up” by a male student in the bathroom.
The lawsuit says the school only called the police when the teenage victim’s father “caused an incident at the front office,” as he became upset about the lack of law enforcement’s involvement. This was the same father who was arrested later for trying to speak out about his daughter's assault at a public school board meeting.
This event and others set in motion a national debate over transgender policies in public schools. Progressive run districts argued that parents have little to no say in their children's educational environment. Parents who raised concerns about trans policies were placed under investigation by the FBI for potential "domestic terrorism". The politicized nature of US schools was exposed. The culture war was about to go nuclear.
When Democrats tried to ideologically groom other people's children, that was the moment they committed political suicide.
Fast forward to 2025 and the American people have decided the trans agenda is an unacceptable element of US schooling that needs to go. The wider culture war is over but there are still elements of progressive indoctrination everywhere. Case in point: Loudon County Schools are once again in the headlines as they continue to try to force students to accept transgenderism as a normal part of their education.
This time, instead of ignoring Title IX protections, they are misapplying them in an apparent effort to silence three male students who were caught on camera complaining about a transgender student (girl pretending to be a boy) changing in the boys locker room.
School officials have pursued a Title IX investigation against the boys, calling their complaints "sexual harassment". Parents report that the officials tried to interrogate the boys and also refused to show the video evidence until pressured to do so.
Nothing in the video footage indicates sexual harassment. In fact, the boys respond quite the opposite, saying they are uncomfortable with the locker room situation. The trans student who illegally filmed inside the locker room was, of course, not placed under investigation by the school.
Luckily, the story has caught the attention of the Virginia Governor's Office. Gov. Glenn Youngkin is looking into the district response, saying he’s “deeply concerned” about how Loudoun County Public Schools handled the matter. Virginia Attorney General Jason Miyares announced that the state will investigate Loudoun County Public Schools following media reports.
“Students who express legitimate concerns about sharing locker rooms with individuals of the opposite biological sex should not be subjected to harassment or discrimination claims,” Youngkin said in a statement.
The situation is reflective of a larger issue, which is the ongoing progressive attempt to change the legal language of sexual harassment to include charges against people that speak out against open door policies for transgenders in historically gender exclusive spaces. The use of sexual harassment investigations is simply a weapon to silence dissent against the trans agenda.
Women's locker rooms and bathrooms in particular have become a battleground, with mentally ill men invading women's private spaces across the country while claiming to be the opposite gender. Incidents involving trans boys (girls pretending to be boys) are more rare, but represent an equally troubling development. The Trump Administration's intent to defund schools that enforce trans inclusion ideology will perhaps finally bring an end to the absurd debate, the the entrenched nature of woke ideology in the education system is a problem that will surely take years to sort out.
-
Site: Zero HedgeA Three Step Solution To Rebuild The Marine CorpsTyler Durden Wed, 05/21/2025 - 20:05
Authored by Gary Anderson via RealClearDefense,
I recently received a call from an old Marine Corps acquaintance who now works for the Corps as a contractor. He has been heavily involved in the controversial Force Design (FD) project begun by former commandant, General David Berger, and continued by his successor General Eric Smith. FD has caused an intellectual civil war within the Corps that has pitted the current senior leadership against many retired marines as well as a growing underground resistance in the active ranks.
I have been a particularly virulent critic of FD for six years and have gone so far as to recommend replacing General Smith with a commandant more open to an approach which would head the Corps back to becoming a balanced world-wide force in readiness rather than being a China-centric force as directed under FD.
I was asked what actions on the part of the current leadership would cause people like me to be less antagonistic toward General Smith and FD.
I started off by telling him that I don't presume to speak for the other people who think that FD is a terrible idea, including every living former commandant, with the exception of Gen Berger. Every living USMC Medal of Honor winner, most of the former Marine Corps combatant commanders, and the editor of the alternative Marine Corps publication "Compass Points".
However, I did outline three steps that would shut me up. All of them are designed to give future commandants some latitude to determine the future of the Corps. Right now, whoever the next commandant is, he will have one option, and that is FD.
First, conduct a real operational and tactical field test of FD. Most critics argue that it is a flawed concept at the strategic, operational, and tactical levels of war. Its operational assumption is that small groups of Marines known as Stand-in-Forces (SIF) can operate from the hundreds of isolated islets and shoals in China’s first island chain, firing sub-sonic NEMSIS anti-ship missiles at Chinese naval combatants. The theory is that they will "shoot and scoot" from islet to islet before the Chinese can develop a firing solution. They would theoretically be transported by light, yet to be built, Navy Medium Landing Ships (LSM).
Most of the critics of FD, myself among them, believe that the SIF will not be able to scoot fast enough to avoid Chinese detection and destruction. Although the personnel numbers are relatively small, the missiles, launchers, and radars are bulky and not easily transported. However, I for one, am willing to be proved wrong.
After six long years, the Marine Corps has exactly one SIF deployed to the Philippines. It could be declared an experimental unit and tested in deployment/employment exercises with the U.S. Navy playing the Chinese Red Team.
However, since the transport LSMs do not yet exist, the marines would have to borrow Army ships with similar capabilities for the experimental exercises. These exercises should be conducted and umpired by the Commander of the Indo-Pacific Command. Being the supported Combatant Commander, If he determines that the concept is as useless as many retired and current marines think it is, the concept can be scrapped before it does any more damage to the Corps in particular and national defense in general.
The second step is a logical follow-on to the first. The commandant should form two more experimental units, one of tanks and one of heavy engineers to include an assault bridging capability. If FD shows itself to be the fraud that I think it is, the next commandant will at least have something to build from.
The Army is looking at some lighter and more transportable tank and engineer capabilities that the Marine Corps discarded to afford the missiles and radars to support the SIFs for FD implementation. At least the new commandant would have something in the way of expertise with which to rebuild a semi-castrated Marine Corps.
A final step would be to insist that the Navy commit to a thirty-eight big deck amphibious ship fleet. When General Berger released the Navy from that requirement the then CNO promised him that the Navy could maintain the capability to maintain three Marine Expeditionary Units afloat world-wide 24/7.
The combination of incompetence and negligence the Navy has fallen far short of that promise. Incredibly, the other living commandants recently allowed Berger to sign on to a letter urging the Navy to expand its amphibious fleet. That is akin to letting the fox complain about hen house security.
I warned my former colleague that my recommendations would probably not be well received at Headquarters Marine Corps or at Quantico and that the current Marine Corps leadership has an unfortunate reputation for shooting the messenger. However, if General Smith wants to quiet the insurgents in the family, those recommendations would be a good place to start. To paraphrase Lynyrd Skynyrd – give me three steps General – and you won't hear from me no more.
Gary Anderson is a retired Marine Corps Colonel who also acted as a Special Advisor to the Deputy Secretary of Defense. He is the author of Beyond Mahan; a Naval Strategy for the 21st Century.
-
Site: Public Discourse
American Protestantism is in a bad way. At least, depending on how you define the term “Protestant.”
For many of us, it means “not Catholic.” If we’ve done our church history homework, or pay attention to online theological debates, maybe we mentally add “or Orthodox.” But baked into the name is a protest and that nominal fist is raised squarely at Rome.
There was a time when the umbrella term did some work. Protestants included the heirs of Martin Luther, of John Calvin, of Thomas Cranmer, even of Menno Simons. Later there were break-offs and dissenters—including pietists (Lutherans who cared about the heart), Puritans (Anglicans who cared about the heart), Baptists (one-time Puritans who cared about the heart), and Methodists (are you sensing a pattern?)—but the family, however extended, was still recognizable.
Aside from a small number of exceptions, you could generally count on Protestants to claim the full heritage of the Reformation as their own. They did so by confessing the creed, ascribing supreme authority to the Bible, ordaining their pastors to the ministry of word and sacrament, and (most of the time) baptizing their babies. Fractiousness was less about the program and more about fidelity of execution. If the Protestant revolution was above all a revolution of the heart, then any time the emphasis shifted to the head, to codified doctrines and calcified institutions, it was only a matter of time before new reformers would arise to lay claim to the original vision and start the whole process over again.
This pattern is common to all revolutions and proved reliably cyclical for successive generations of Protestant believers.
What about a more radical vision, though, one that went down to the roots? Europe already contained seeds of such a thoroughgoing transformation, but it wasn’t until the American frontier that they bore lasting fruit. This fruit is, you might say, a third species in the genus of Western Christianity. Neither Catholic nor Protestant, it has taken more than two centuries to come into clear view. It goes by many names, but the best is also the most hotly contested: evangelical.
As I use it, “evangelical” names non-Catholic Christians who are “low church.” By this I mean that evangelicals are:
1) biblicist, meaning the Bible isn’t just chief among many authorities, including church tradition, but the one and only authority;
2) autonomous, meaning their organizational leadership structures are either local or, if trans-local, then voluntary and quite loose;
3) egalitarian, meaning they either do not ordain pastors or, if they do, then the qualifications for and prerogatives of the ministry are modest;
4) entrepreneurial, meaning churches are often analogous to start-up business ventures, founded and led by charismatic individuals who cast a vision for the community;
5) evangelistic, meaning proselytization is high on the agenda, using money, grassroots training, and parachurch ministries to support foreign missions and local efforts at gaining new converts;
6) affective, meaning their piety is focused on the heart, which is more likely to find expression in music, song, and spontaneous spiritual gifts than in robes, rituals, and sacraments.
Note well that these six features all center the individual will, which in turn helps to explain why evangelicals do not baptize their babies. Faith cannot be imposed; it can only be chosen. The same rule applies to local congregations. Evangelicals inhabit a competitive marketplace in which believers vote with their feet. If your church can’t supply decisive reasons why they should stay with you, then rest assured they will be out the door and church shopping in a matter of months.
It’s not hard to grasp what respectable Protestants in the early nineteenth century thought of evangelicals when they first started making noise: at best, ignorant déclassé upstarts; at worst, heretics, nincompoops, and frauds. Despoilers of doctrine, corrupters of tradition, arrogant racketeers of religion pulling the wool over simpletons’ eyes. Would it be better or worse if they actually believed in what they were hawking? No creed, no clergy, no church, just you and the Lord and the Bible and maybe a preacher to bring the three together at a revival.
Fast forward to the present. The reputable Protestants never knew what hit them. Today American Protestantism is all but dead, whereas evangelicalism is alive and, if not exactly well, then certainly kicking. What happened?
Earlier this spring I published an essay for First Things called “Goldilocks Protestantism.” It makes the case that Protestantism as we know it, both nationally and globally, is on life support. The Christian world has become either “high,” meaning catholic, or “low,” meaning evangelical. The one includes bishops and priests, liturgy and tradition, creeds and councils, icons and saints, relics and mystics, Mary and monks, whereas the other includes none of the above. The excluded middle is the Protestantism of the Reformation, a “Goldilocks” Gospel that strives to be neither too high nor too low, but just right. By my reckoning, this style of faith makes up no more than 10 percent of global Christianity. In truth it may be as low as 5 percent, and its numbers continue to decline.
That’s the global story. Now I’d like to focus on the national story. As Hemingway once described the onset of bankruptcy, American Protestantism collapsed slowly, then all at once. Precisely while it was building to an extraordinary, dominating height in the 1960s, its competitors and eventual replacements were growing as well, biding their time. They only had to wait. Termites had long since found their way to the foundation. Once it was destroyed from within, there was no way to reverse the damage. The house was doomed to fall.
Let’s date the pinnacle to the late 1950s. By one estimate, in 1958, more than half of all Americans belonged to a “mainline” Protestant denomination. Think Methodist, Lutheran, Presbyterian, Episcopalian. It’s a mistake to wonder how many of these were “actual” as opposed to “nominal” Christians. The social prestige was the point. A prestigious institution is powerful just to the extent that it attracts members regardless of their beliefs. The “mainline” was what you belonged to if you aspired to join—or sought the respect of, or wanted to remain in—the class that ran the country. Presidents, politicians, and businessmen placed formal membership in a known and vetted Protestant denomination. They were neither irreligious nor part of the riffraff (fundamentalists, Pentecostals, Mormons). Like Roman philosophers, their private skepticism and unchristian habits were beside the point: civil religion binds society together. Pay your tithes, say your prayers, make the sacrifices; otherwise the center might not hold.
The center did not hold anyway. Today perhaps fewer than one in ten Americans is a mainline Protestant, and most of them don’t go to church. Demographers predict that in the next dozen years this percentage will trend downward until it settles around one to three percent. So what happened? At this point the story is well told. The best popular books on the subject are Ross Douthat’s Bad Religion, Joseph Bottum’s An Anxious Age, and Tara Isabella Burton’s Strange Rites, all of which build on the work of scholars like Nathan Hatch, George Marsden, Mark Noll, Christian Smith, and David Chappell. Lately we’ve also been well served by sociologists and demographers like Ryan Burge, Stephen Bullivant, and Phil Zuckerman. This only scratches the surface of the research published on the subject.
I’m a theologian and make no claim to originality. In what follows I’d simply like to lift up four themes from these and other works that I find illuminating for understanding the story of American Protestantism, past, present, and future.
Before beginning, though, a caveat is in order. The black church is one of the central institutions of American life and its numbers, although finally showing decline in younger generations, resemble far more the embattled resilience of white evangelicals than the deflated balloon of the white mainline. At the same time, African American Christians are not nearly so easy to categorize as the language of “the black church” would suggest. Black believers fill the pews of Protestant churches, charismatic and Pentecostal churches, evangelical and Baptist churches, and both majority-black and majority-white churches. A small but sturdy percentage is Roman Catholic. In other words, they are well distributed. So while I will not be focusing on race, I here acknowledge that it—not just race but racism—hovers above and within and around the story, sometimes at the edges, more often at the heart of it.
Protestantism and the Sexual Revolution
The transition from Eisenhower to Kennedy symbolizes, for the American mainline, both a summit and a cliff. The reason is that the 1960s kicked off two epochal trends that continue into the present. The first was the sexual revolution.
It could be argued that, in the last seventy-five years, every major public debate in the American church, including every occasion for schism or division, has been about sex. Divorce and remarriage, artificial contraception, births out of wedlock, working mothers, single parenting, the Pill, abortion, the ordination of women, sex outside marriage, same-sex marriage, gender identity and biological sex—these, and not arguments about Jesus or justification by faith, have dominated Christian discourse. (Race, again, is the only other contender, whether in the 1970s or the 2020s. This, too, is a social and not a doctrinal issue.)
With respect to sex, the mainline bet on the wrong horse. It allied itself to the liberalism of the political, educational, and cultural elites and this, it turned out, was not what most American Christians were looking for—even when they agreed on the politics. Mainline Protestantism had always been respectable, and since political and sexual liberalism was supposed to be not just the spirit of the present age but the vanguard of the future, then liberalism as such needed to be embraced and proclaimed from within the Church, from her pulpits and prayers and pamphlets. This liberalism was all-encompassing: it was moral, it was political, it was activist, and ultimately it was theological, too. It called into question the trustworthiness of Scripture, the classical metaphysics of the creeds, the traditional morality of the catechisms, and much more besides.
Defection and loss weren’t instantaneous, but once the ball got rolling it only sped up as the years went by. Two phenomena are worth noting. On one hand, ordinary people in the pews needed a reason to come to church. But if the mainline was merely the DNC at prayer while crossing its fingers even during prayer, then why go? Why not sleep in, drift away, or maybe join that young, vibrant, energetic start-up around the corner? Sure, they might be a little conservative, but they’re on to something. There’s life there. And there’s no doubt that they believe—evangelicals aren’t known for crossing fingers.
On the other hand, mainline leaders living in the postwar boom failed to realize how much they depended on the social and religious capital built up from prior centuries. They fervently believed in the separation of church and state, but they operated as the clerisy of an unofficially established church. They cared about helping the poor, but their education and values (not to mention the source of their prestige and a good portion of their rolls) were substantially upper-class. They hated war and segregation, but their WASP credentials alienated them from the working class, both white and black, and their fence-sitting on Vietnam marked them as insufficiently radical for the left and insufficiently patriotic for the right. While their younger members protested, their older members began to trickle out the door.
In a word, mainline leadership took for granted that the world they’d always known and led would somehow remain in place even as they helped to birth a new world to replace it. But in midwifing a novus ordo seclorum into being, they rendered themselves redundant. Once you’ve placed a question mark next to traditional beliefs, traditional morals, and traditional texts, what else is left? Absent these, there is no reason to join a religious tradition except for community and social capital. But those are byproducts of membership; as the sole motivation for observance or attendance, they are far too weak to sustain belonging, especially when peer pressure has relaxed.
It is a tautology to say that religion becomes optional when it is no longer compulsory. Compulsoriness, however, is said many ways. For many people church was felt to be compulsory, even if, strictly speaking, it was not. And once the feeling was gone for mainline Protestants, they started heading for the exits.
Losing Our Religion
This trend, namely, Americans leaving religion altogether, leads to another I want to highlight: secularization. Like “evangelical,” this is a charged term with dozens of possible meanings. For my purposes I will rely on a sociological definition offered by Phil Zuckerman, Isabella Kasselstrand, and Ryan T. Cragun. In their book Beyond Doubt: The Secularization of Society, they argue that secularization includes:
1) the process of religion losing its overarching, hegemonic significance as a result of its being increasingly differentiated and sequestered from other institutional sectors of society and 2) the concomitant processes whereby religiosity weakens, lessens, diminishes, or fades in society. At the micro level, secularization is best understood, articulated, and measured in relation to the three Bs. That is, secularization entails a social process in which fewer people, over time, believe in supernatural claims, fewer people engage in religious behaviors, and fewer people belong to or identify with a religion.
The authors go on to argue that, as societies develop economically and/or adopt liberal political structures, they always secularize. This, they say, is demonstrably true and brooks no significant exceptions. The end result “is not widespread irreligion,” meaning mass atheism or opposition to religion, “but rather widespread religious indifference.” Such indifference is not mutually exclusive with plenty of people believing, behaving, and belonging in religious ways and in religious communities. But the civic bonds of social obligation have seriously deteriorated; the ambient culture no longer makes faith a given of common life.
The process of secularization came earlier for Europe, and for a time it seemed America would hold out. It proved only to be a delay. Members of every generation since the Boomers are less likely to be regular attenders of religious services of any kind, less likely to be regular attenders of a Christian church, and less likely to claim to be Christians. Three terms have been proposed to describe these Americans: “None,” “Nothing in Particular,” and “Nonvert.” The first takes its name from those who check none of the above on a survey of religious options, but for this reason it includes atheists and agnostics. The second group picks out those Nones who are neither atheist/agnostic nor a member of a determinate religious body. The third, coined by Stephen Bullivant, refers to members of either the first or the second group who were raised in a religiously observant household but, at some point in teen years or adulthood, left the faith and did not join another.
Regarding this last group, a book published in 2023 called The Great Dechurching offers some important insight. With the help of research done by Ryan Burge and Paul Djupe, pastors Jim Davis and Michael Graham found that forty million living American adults no longer attend church, though they once did, and that “most of this dechurching has happened in the past twenty-five years.” That’s 15 percent of the population. If true, it amounts to a kind of negative Third Great Awakening, and quite possibly the greatest single-generation religious shift in American history.
Whether we call these people Nones, Nonverts, or Dechurched, they are a growing, if curious, bunch. Most of them still believe in the divine and many still pray or occasionally attend religious services. If you count them as one American religious group among others, comparing them not to Christianity in general but to Hindus and Muslims, Catholics and Baptists, they are likely to be the largest such group in the next decade. In his new book The American Religious Landscape, Burge even argues that, among all Americans, “it’s probable that nothing in particulars will be the plurality choice . . . in the next fifteen or twenty years.”
This, in brief, is the secular future and present for American society: at once religious and irreligious, Christian and post-Christian, spiritual but not institutional, culturally Protestant but syncretistic, entrepreneurial, and individualistic in practice. Nathan Hatch calls this “the democratization of American Christianity.” Ross Douthat’s term is “bad religion.” Americans don’t give up on prayer or the supernatural, they just opt for heresies old and new, riffing on received religion with peculiarly American twists. Tara Burton calls it “remixed religion,” a do-it-yourself approach that fuses crystals and seances with sacraments and rosaries. It’s odd only if you assume the truth is found nowhere except in one of the major global institutional expressions of faith. And that’s just begging the question.
Who Will Replace the Mainline?
I said I’d lift up four themes, and so far I’ve mentioned two: the sexual revolution and secularization. The other two are simply other Christian traditions: evangelicalism and Catholicism. These, in a sort of pincer movement, quietly advanced on the mainline’s position and, when the opportune moment arrived, attacked it from both sides. It didn’t happen all at once; rather, it resulted from decades of quiet incremental expansion.
We have already seen what has long attracted so many Americans to evangelicalism: the frontier spirit, the can-do attitude, the charismatic vision, the muscular ambition, the cultural adaptability, the missionary zeal, the affective dimension, the leveling spirit. Youth, vitality, growth, expansion—these have always marked American evangelicalism even and especially when besieged by challenges, whether from without or from within. You can see this today in the only growing Christian group in America: so-called “nondenominational” churches. It is unclear whether this growth comes from converts to the faith or “transfers” from other Christian traditions. At any rate it is one more example of the old frontier flexibility applied to a newly competitive marketplace, innovating to attract newcomers inside the doors.
This is the essence of evangelicalism, because evangelicalism is the American genius applied to Christian religion. Evangelicals’ every virtue and every vice have their roots in the American character. The two are intertwined. Evangelicals believe in the Gospel, but they also believe in America. Even the most jaded among them retain some hope in the latter; the despair of some evangelicals in the last decade is best explained by a loss of faith, not in God, but in the country.
To be clear, secularization comes for all, and just as it made inroads on the mainline in the 1960s and ’70s, so it did the same with evangelicals in the last three decades. Perhaps they failed to learn the lesson of Protestant liberals and wedded themselves to a narrow politics, only this time on the right instead of the left. Perhaps their moral and other failures exhausted the patience of parishioners. Perhaps evangelicals, too, were drawing down on capital they’d not created themselves, capital they furthermore lacked the institutional strength to replenish. In any case, evangelicals we will always have with us, but in the coming years they will endure in diminished numbers.
That leaves Catholics. With around sixty-two million Americans on the rolls, Catholicism is by far the largest religious tradition in the country. No other Protestant group comes close. The primary reasons are immigration and, until recently, large families. The truth, however, is that American Catholicism cannot keep its children in the faith, and both Nones and evangelicals are the beneficiaries. Even today its numbers appear superficially steady by comparison to others’ decline solely because of the steady stream of Catholic immigrants across the border. There is a distinct possibility, then, that Catholic support of strict immigration and deportation policies could end up weakening Catholics’ dominant presence in America.
For a moment it seemed that Catholics might seize the leadership vacuum left open by the collapse—the detonation, the evacuation, the suicide—of mainline Protestantism. Just as neoconservatives were anti-Communist liberals who moved right during the Cold War, so erstwhile liberal Protestants found themselves politically homeless, even betrayed, in the 1970s. For a Lutheran like Robert Jenson, who marched on Washington in 1963 and protested the war in Vietnam, the Supreme Court’s ruling in Roe v. Wade changed everything. From Jenson’s perspective, the moral and political through-line from racial segregation through bombing villages to abortion on demand was self-evident. He learned quickly that the connections were not nearly so clear to those he marched with. For this reason his fellow Lutheran, Richard John Neuhaus, left Protestantism and was received into the Catholic Church.
Neuhaus, Jenson, and their many friends and fellow travelers hoped the mainline could be replaced, if not by Catholics per se then by an ecumenical alliance led by conservative Catholic clergy and intellectuals. It was not to be. They had success in elite spheres like academia and Washington, D.C. They advised presidents, launched think tanks and magazines, filled seats on courts at every level. But even if America wasn’t so culturally Protestant as to recoil at a new Catholic mainline—and I think it was and ever will be—the one-two punch of the sex abuse crisis and the George W. Bush presidency put that notion to rest for good. The American bishops are still recovering from their loss of moral leadership. And with reason.
Not that Catholics are going anywhere. Their sheer numbers, plus the continuation of immigration in some form from countries in Asia, Africa, and Latin America with large Catholic populations, plus their disproportionate presence in elite cultural, legal, and political institutions ensure a Catholic future even in secular America.
In a way, you might reduce the complexity of that religious future (which, I risk repeating, is the present) by reference to four groups: Catholics, evangelicals, cultural Protestants, and other. “Other” would encompass actual mainline Protestants, Eastern Orthodox Christians, and all non-Christian religious traditions as well as vehemently anti-Christian groups. “Cultural Protestants” would describe Christian-friendly atheists and agnostics, adherents of American civil religion, citizens who don’t go to church but pray in the name of Jesus, and ex-Christians of various stripes—i.e., all people who wear the mantle of high-Protestant civilization and its mores, which is to say, the worldview minus the metaphysics.
And this returns us to where we began: namely, with the vast middle of American Christianity utterly hollowed out. Mainline believers who remained in the faith were either hoovered “up” into catholic traditions or pulled “down” into evangelical fellowships. To be sure, there remain some true-believing via media Protestants who are morally and theologically conservative and continue to attempt to strike the balance between high and low. These are members, for example, of the Presbyterian Church of America (PCA), the Lutheran Church–Missouri Synod (LCMS), the newly formed Global Methodist Church (GMC), and offshoots of Episcopalianism like the Reformed Episcopal Church (REC), Anglican Church of North America (ACNA), and Anglican Mission in the Americas (AMiA). Outside of the Methodists, whose departure from the larger, more liberal United Methodist Church (UMC)—over, yes, sexual ethics—is still ongoing, each of these groups is a fraction of a fraction of the American population. Whatever their future, they will not be resuming their place at the commanding heights of the culture.
More to the point, even these traditions contain more than a little evangelical DNA. What “converts” they make are often already Christians who are looking for a more liturgically reverent, more intellectually sophisticated, more historically rooted Protestantism. These believers, sometimes ex-Catholics but usually ex-vangelicals, bring the American religious genius with them through the doors. In many cases it’s only a matter of time before the leveling impulse wends its way through the parish. Soon it will be evangelical in all but name. This is fitting, since the churches in America have for some time been Protestant in name only.
-
Site: Fr. Z's Blog
Pages
