Distinction Matter - Subscribed Feeds

  1. Site: Zero Hedge
    2 days 1 hour ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    US Attorney's New Program Sidesteps California's Sanctuary Laws Shielding Illegals From ICE

    Authored by Darlene McCormick Sanchez via The Epoch Times,

    In what could be a game changer for the Trump administration’s deportation efforts, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for California’s Central District and federal partners launched a program to “neutralize California’s sanctuary state policy.”

    Operation Guardian Angel, announced by federal officials on May 19, will file complaints and arrest warrants to allow federal authorities to take as many defendants as possible into custody from county jails, according to a Department of Justice press release.

    “Under the Trump administration, we will not allow sanctuary jurisdictions to stand in the way of keeping the American People safe,” U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli, who launched the test program, posted on X.

    One of President Donald Trump’s main campaign promises for a second term was the mass deportation of millions who came into the country illegally during the Biden administration.

    If a person who has been deported reenters the country illegally, that’s a felony under Title 8 law, said Ciaran McEvoy, a spokesman for the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Los Angeles.

    California’s state law—Senate Bill 54—prevents county sheriff’s departments and local law enforcement from honoring an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detainer.

    “Even if they want to turn them over, they can’t,” McEvoy told The Epoch Times.

    Operation Guardian Angel gets around the law through federal arrest warrants, which McEvoy said leave the counties no choice but to hand the targeted illegal immigrants over.

    Essayli stated in the press release that “the worst criminal aliens in state custody are frequently released into the community” because California’s sanctuary state policies block cooperation with federal law enforcement.

    “These laws effectively render federal immigration detainers meaningless. The days of giving criminal illegal aliens a free pass are over,” he stated.

    “While California may be presently disregarding detainers, it cannot ignore federal arrest warrants.”

    The program, which began May 10, has resulted in the arrest of 13 defendants as of May 15 in California. The Operation Guardian Angel task force is made up of ICE, the FBI, the Drug Enforcement Administration, Homeland Security Investigations, and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.

    The California federal district is home to the counties of Riverside, San Bernardino, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Ventura, and Los Angeles County. An estimated 1.5 million illegal immigrants reside in the district, including gang members, the press release said, adding that California’s protection of criminal illegal aliens makes residents less safe.

    The release noted that in February 2025, José Cristian Saravia-Sánchez, 30, of Mexico, shot and killed an Inglewood man who tried to stop him from stealing a catalytic converter, which garnered national attention.

    He was an illegal immigrant who had been convicted of vehicle theft, removed from the United States in 2013, and arrested 11 times between June 2022 and August 2024, according to the release. However, local law enforcement was prevented by state law from complying with an immigration detainer request, the release stated.

    The office of California Gov. Gavin Newsom did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Epoch Times by publication time.

    Tyler Durden Tue, 05/20/2025 - 15:00
  2. Site: Mundabor's blog
    2 days 1 hour ago
    Author: Mundabor
    And it came to pass that we have, today, the first guy who loses the first office in Leo’s Pontificate. This is very interesting, as from these kind of decisions you can get a clue about the future intentions of the Pontiff. It turns out that the first guy who loses a job (at the […]
  3. Site: Zero Hedge
    2 days 1 hour ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    US Shale Output Nearing Peak As Oil Prices Stagnate

    Authored by Tsvetana Paraskova via OilPrice.com,

    • Low oil prices and economic uncertainty are causing U.S. oil production, particularly in shale basins, to plateau or decline earlier than anticipated.

    • Major oil companies acknowledge the accelerated peak in U.S. oil output, with the Permian Basin being the last major area still showing growth potential.

    • Forecasts for U.S. crude supply are being revised downward as the profitability of shale production is challenged by current oil prices.

    The decline in oil prices and the prevailing uncertainty about the economy, trade, and supply chains are accelerating the peak in U.S. oil production despite President Donald Trump’s ‘drill, baby, drill’ slogan.  

    With the U.S. benchmark WTI crude prices at $60 per barrel, it’s mostly “hold, baby, hold” in the American shale patch, where output in the major basins except the Permian has already started to level off or drop. 

    The U.S.-China 90-day tariff pause and the start of trade talks did little to erase the crash in oil prices from April, and even less to restore confidence or wipe out the high uncertainty regarding the economy and the cost of supply with unknown levels of tariffs. The shale patch has historically been immediately responsive to changing market conditions, but living in 90-day cycles of tariffs, no-tariffs, reduced tariffs, or surprise U.S. geopolitical moves could be too much for the oil industry, especially the smaller companies. 

    The big ones, including ExxonMobil, Chevron, Occidental, and ConocoPhillips, aren’t voicing publicly concerns about doing business and doing it as usual at $60 oil. But some of them have already said that the peak in U.S. oil production is being accelerated and could be sooner than previously expected. 

    The peak, whenever it occurs, does not mean a steep decline afterwards—it would rather be a long plateau of leveling off of U.S. crude oil production in which the slowdown in shale would be partly offset by rising output from the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, executives and analysts say.  

    “As you know that most of the shale basins now have either plateaued or starting to decline, except for the Permian,” Vicki Hollub, President and CEO of Occidental Petroleum, said on the Q1 earnings call. 

    “If companies continue to talk about dropping activity levels, I think the Permian could plateau sooner than we expected - and we had expected the Permian to continue growth through 2027,” Hollub added. 

    Oxy had expected that U.S. production overall would peak between 2027 and 2030. 

    “It's looking like with the current headwinds or at least volatility and uncertainty around pricing and the economy and recessions and all of that - it's looking like that peak could come sooner,” Hollub said, adding that the Permian would grow very little this year, if at all.  

    Ryan Lance, the chief executive of ConocoPhillips, said on the company’s earnings call that at $60 oil, “the folks that don't have the kind of cost of supply sitting in their portfolio are going to find themselves cash-strapped and returns-strapped.”

    “Obviously, the balance sheets are in pretty good shape across the industry, better than we were in the last downturn, but you'll see a lot of activity cut back,” Lance added. 

    At current prices, ConocoPhillips doesn’t expect a lot of things to change for the company, although there would be changes if WTI sinks to $50 per barrel. However, “that's not our view today and doesn't represent where we think the market is going to be for the next few years,” Lance noted. 

    The current mantra at ConocoPhillips is “don't whipsaw this thing too hard right now…so don't overreact, but don't put your head in the sand either.” 

    Earlier this month, Diamondback Energy said onshore oil production in the U.S. has already peaked

    “We currently estimate that the U.S. frac crew count is already down ~15% this year, with the Permian Basin crew count down ~20% from its January peak, and both are expected to decline further,” Diamondback said in a letter to investors. 

    Liberty Energy, the fracking company founded by now-Energy Secretary Chris Wright, is also prepping for a slowdown in shale drilling.  

    U.S. crude oil supply will rise more slowly than expected for the rest of 2025 and in 2026 and peak as early as this year, as WTI prices at $60 per barrel are testing the breakeven point of shale production, energy flows intelligence firm Kpler said last week. 

    With the low oil prices, Kpler has now cut its U.S. crude supply forecast by 120,000 barrels per day (bpd) to 170,000 bpd for the rest of 2025 and into 2026, “as weaker prices threaten to slow shale production.”  

    Despite steady near-term activity, growth is slowing in the U.S. shale patch, and U.S. crude output is set to peak this year, Kpler noted. 

    Tyler Durden Tue, 05/20/2025 - 14:20
  4. Site: Mises Institute
    2 days 2 hours ago
    Author: Mark Thornton
    Mark Thornton appears on Liberty and Finance with Elijah K. Johnson.
  5. Site: Zero Hedge
    2 days 2 hours ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    The Red Line: Democratic Officials Claim A Dangerous License For Illegality

    Authored by Jonathan Turley,

    Across the country, a new defense is being heard in state and federal courtrooms. From Democratic members of Congress to judges to city council members, officials claim that their official duties include obstructing the official functions of the federal government. 

    It is a type of liberal license that excuses most any crime in the name of combating what Minn. Gov. Tim Walz called the “modern-day Gestapo of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

    The latest claimant of this license is Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-NJ), who was charged with assaulting, resisting, and impeding law enforcement officers during a protest at Delaney Hall ICE detention facility in Newark, New Jersey. McIver is shown on video forcing her way into an ICE facility and striking and shoving agents in her path.

    This was not a major incursion, but these state and federal officials joined a mob in briefly overwhelming security and breaching the fence barrier after a bus was allowed through the entrance. Federal officials were able to quickly force back the incursion.

    McIver and House Democrats insisted that McIver’s forcing her way into the facility might be trespass and assault for other citizens, but she was merely exercising “legislative oversight.” Rep. Alexandria Ocacio-Cortez (D., N.Y.) declared “You lay a finger on someone – on Bonnie Watson Coleman or any of the representatives that were there – you lay a finger on them, we’re going to have a problem.”

    Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D., N.Y.) even ominously warned the federal government that Democrats would bring down the house if it tried to charge McIver: “It’s a red line. They know better than to go down that road.”

    Well, the red line was crossed in a big way after Acting U.S. Attorney for the District of New Jersey Alina Habba charged McIver with a felony under Title 18, United States Code, Section 111(a)(1).

    The ACLU called the charged “authoritarianism” and insisted that these state and federal politicians “have every right to exercise their legally authorized oversight responsibilities for expanded immigration detention in New Jersey.”

    The problem with the oversight claim is that McIver’s status as a member of Congress does not allow her access into closed federal facilities. Congress can subpoena the Executive Branch or secure court orders for access. However, member do not have immunity from criminal laws in unilaterally forcing their way into any federal office or agency.

    If that were the case, Rep. Alexandria Ocacio-Cortez would not have posted images of herself crying at the fence of an immigrant facility, she could have climbed over the fence in the name of oversight.

    Conversely, Republicans in the Biden Administration could have simply pushed their way into the Justice Department to seek the files on the influence-peddling scandal.

    Yet, the point of the claim is less of a real criminal defense and more of a political excuse.

    It is the same claim being heard this week from Worcester City Councilor Etel Haxhiaj who was shown in a video shoving and obstructing ICE officers attempting to arrest a woman on immigration charges. Two other individuals (including a Democratic candidate for a school board) were arrested, but not Haxhiaj who claimed that she was merely protecting “a constituent.” After the melee, the city manager issued an order preventing city police from assisting in any way in the carrying out of such civil immigration enforcement efforts by the federal government.

    Even judges are claiming the same license. 

    In Wisconsin, Judge Hannah Dugan has been charged with obstructing a federal arrest of an illegal immigrant who appeared in her courtroom. Dugan heard about agents waiting outside in the hallway to arrest the man and went outside to confront the agents. She told them to speak to the Chief Judge and that they needed a different warrant.

    The agents complied and the Chief Judge confirmed that they could conduct the arrest. In the interim, however, Dugan led the man out a non-public door and facilitated his escape (he was arrested after a chase down a public street).

    Judge Duggan also claimed that she was carrying out her duties even though her hearing was over, the charges were not part of state matter, and the arrest was being carried out outside of her courtroom.

    As Democratic leaders like Walz engage in rage rhetoric and paint Republicans (and federal law enforcement) as Nazis, political violence across the country. Many of the people burning Teslas and engaging in such crimes claim the same type of license that the ends justify the means. That includes affluent professionals who are now shoplifting from Whole Foods as a “protest” against Jeff Bezos meeting with Trump.

    When the Administration sought to investigate those burning Teslas and dealerships, Rep. Dan Goldman (D., N.Y.) denounced it as a “political weaponization” of the legal system. The comments suggest that such arson is somehow a form of political expression on the left.

    House Minority Leader Jeffries was correct that a “red line” was crossed but not the one that he was thinking of in threatening consequences for any charges. The red line is the one separating political expression and criminal conduct.

    Border Czar stressed repeatedly to political leaders that they can protest and refuse to help but “you can‘t cross the line” into obstruction and interference with their operations.

    If oversight means that members can force their way into any federal facilities, we would have 535 roaming inspectors general who could wander at will through the executive branch.

    Rep. McIver would be better to claim a different type of oversight, in allowing her passion to briefly overwhelm her judgment in rushing into the facility.

    In the end, however, McIver and Duggan may have a license of a different kind.

    Both have an advantage of being charged in liberal districts where they would appear before sympathetic jurors.  They need to just convince a single jury to engage in “jury nullification,” to vote based on the cause, not the crime, in the case.

    Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro professor of public interest law at George Washington University and the author of “The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage.”

    Tyler Durden Tue, 05/20/2025 - 13:40
  6. Site: Zero Hedge
    2 days 2 hours ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    US Should Never Have Gotten 'Entangled' In Ukraine 'Death Trap': Trump

    President Trump following Monday's phone calls with Russia's Vladimir Putin and Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky said that the United States should have never intervened in Ukraine in the first place.

    He blasted his predecessor Joe Biden for sinking boundless billions in arms and aid into Kiev's coffers and yet it has only been a "death trap" and "real mess" which US decision-makers should have avoided altogether. "This is not my war. We got ourselves entangled in something we shouldn't have been involved in, and we would have been a lot better off. It's a real mess. It's a death trap," he said before reporters Monday afternoon.

    Via Reuters

    "I do have a certain line, but I don't want to say what that line is because I think it makes the negotiation even more difficult than it is," Trump asserted. When pressed, he refrained from divulging what precisely that red line is in the press briefing.

    Trump also addressed the ever-present potential for the US to get drawn in deeper, which is why he said this should be Europe's mess and responsibility, and not the United States'.

    "We don’t have boots on the ground, we wouldn’t have boots on the ground. But we do have a big stake. The financial amount that was put up is just crazy," he added.

    "Again, this was a European situation. It should have remained a European situation. But we got involved – much more than Europe did – because the past administration felt very strongly that we should," he said. "We gave massive amounts, I think record-setting amounts, both weaponry and money."

    Watch a key segment of the Trump presser:

    Reporter: “Do you have a red line of what would cause you to back away?”

    Trump: “Yeah, in my head, but not something I'm going to announce…This isn't our war…We got ourselves entangled in something that we shouldn't have been involved in.” pic.twitter.com/tVCZcyfLhj

    — The Bulwark (@BulwarkOnline) May 19, 2025

    Meanwhile, in the wake of the Trump-Putin call, which lasted over two hours, the mainstream media has been slamming the US president as essentially giving Putin a free hand. President Trump had said it went "very well" and that he seems "an imminent end to the war".

    For example, below is The Washington Post's perspective in a fresh Tuesday report:

    A phone call between President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin shut down an effort to pressure Russia into an immediate ceasefire and instead opened the way for continued fighting while lengthy negotiations take place — much to the consternation of Ukraine and its European allies Tuesday.

    Trump’s abandonment of new sanctions on Russian indicated that he may be stepping away from involvement in the talks, something that his team has been flagging for weeks. Trump said Monday that the conditions for a ceasefire could only be agreed by the warring parties “because they know details of a negotiation that nobody else would be aware of.”

    European leaders say they had originally been planning with U.S. officials to levy new sanctions on Russia if it did not declare an immediate ceasefire in Ukraine.

    And yet the reality is that the sanctions themselves would certainly escalate the conflict and proxy war further, providing even less of an opportunity for a diplomatic off-ramp, and Trump knows this.

    Trump had written just after the call: "Russia and Ukraine will immediately start negotiations toward a Ceasefire and, more importantly, an END to the War.

    Growing impatience on all sides, even among Trump supporters and conservatives, amid fears that the proxy war could just continue endlessly...

    Trump continues to pose as a mediator while simultaneously supplying weapons and intelligence to Ukraine. pic.twitter.com/Q8vzJr7Bbz

    — Thomas Fazi (@battleforeurope) May 20, 2025

    He wrote on Truth Social, "The conditions for that will be negotiated between the two parties, as it can only be, because they know details of a negotiation that nobody else would be aware of. 

    He then emphasized, "The tone and spirit of the conversation were excellent. If it wasn’t, I would say so now, rather than later."

    * * * 

    Fresh remarks from Rubio on Tuesday, defending the president's talks with Putin...

    Rubio pushes back against claims about the administration's disengagement, says "I see some of those Foreign Ministers, including individuals from Ukraine, more than i see my own children."

    WATCH!! Rubio argues that Putin “hasn’t gotten a single concession” pic.twitter.com/rMhVwU5SSd

    — Alex Raufoglu (@ralakbar) May 20, 2025
    Tyler Durden Tue, 05/20/2025 - 13:20
  7. Site: The Remnant Newspaper
    2 days 2 hours ago
    Author: angelinemarietherese@gmail.com (Angeline Tan | Remnant Columnist, Singapore)
  8. Site: Mises Institute
    2 days 3 hours ago
    Author: Wanjiru Njoya
    Academic scholars tend to use Marxian terms when pointing out what they see as conditions of “oppression,” believing that race and class determine outcomes. However, the real world is not so abstract and things often are not what Marxists believe to be true.
  9. Site: Zero Hedge
    2 days 3 hours ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    Coinbase Data Leak Could Put Users In Physical Danger; TechCrunch Founder

    Authored by Zoltan Vardai via CoinTelegraph.com,

    A recent data breach at crypto exchange Coinbase has raised concerns about user safety after hackers gained access to sensitive information, including home addresses.

    Coinbase, the world’s third-largest cryptocurrency exchange, confirmed that less than 1% of its transacting monthly users were affected in an attack that may cost the exchange up to $400 million in reimbursement expenses, Cointelegraph reported on May 15.

    However, the “human cost” of this data breach may be much higher for users, according to Michael Arrington, the founder of TechCrunch and Arrington Capital.

    “Very disappointed in Coinbase right now. Using the cheapest option for customer service has its price,” Arrington said in a May 20 X post, adding:

    “Something that has to be said though - this hack - which includes home addresses and account balances - will lead to people dying. It probably has already.

    Source: Michael Arrington

    While no passwords, private keys or account funds were exposed, cybercriminals reportedly bribed overseas customer service contractors to access internal systems. This allowed them to steal personal data that could be used in social engineering scams or even physical extortion attempts.

    With Bitcoin trading above $100,000, crypto wealth has become a growing target for criminals. Experts warn that leaked address data could expose high-net-worth individuals to real-world risks.

    On May 16, Cointelegraph reported on six violent robberies that targeted cryptocurrency investors, aiming to extort digital assets via kidnapping or torture.

    In a ruthless attack on May 4, the father of a French crypto entrepreneur was abducted in Paris, France. The kidnappers cut the victim’s finger and sent a video to his son, demanding 5 million euros in crypto.

    The victim was held for two days before French police were able to find and rescue him. According to CNN, five people were arrested in connection with the kidnapping.

    Crypto exchanges need “layered” cybersecurity

    To prevent similar user data breaches, crypto exchanges need to adopt a “layered defense strategy,” according to Ronghui Gu, the co-founder of CertiK Web3 security firm.

    “This can include privileged access management, zero trust architecture, multifactor authentication across internal systems, and continuous monitoring with behavioral analytics,” Gu told Cointelegraph, adding: 

    “Preventive measures such as regular phishing simulations, tailored security training, and restricting third-party access to sensitive systems may help reduce these risks.”

    However, crypto platforms will need to “rethink their security posture” as attackers “increasingly target human vulnerabilities rather than technical ones,” added Gu, warning of the rising threat of social engineering schemes.

    Incidents and losses in 2024 by month. Source: CertiK

    Social engineering schemes, such as phishing scams, were the most significant security threat of 2024, costing the industry over $1 billion across 296 incidents, according to CertiK.

    Tyler Durden Tue, 05/20/2025 - 13:00
  10. Site: southern orders
    2 days 3 hours ago

     This Tuesday afternoon at The Basilica of Saint Paul Outside the Walls:




  11. Site: AsiaNews.it
    2 days 3 hours ago
    The reporter, whose identity has not been released, is accused of obstructing the Election Commission with an article claiming that 99 Chinese spies had been moved from South Korea to Japan after former President Yoon declared martial law. The affair reflects the tense climate of the presidential election campaign. Meanwhile, the leader of the Democratic Party Lee Jae-myung continues to be ahead in the polls.
  12. Site: LifeNews
    2 days 3 hours ago
    Author: Ben Johnson

    An anti-Christian, anti-life terrorist detonated a car bomb outside a California fertility clinic, blowing up the media narrative that pro-life Christians have been waging a “war on IVF.” His actions reveal the blind eye the Biden-Harris administration turned to violent leftists. Yet his actions and the media response, especially the triumphant announcement that no embryos had been harmed, can teach us all a great deal about the value of every life.

    The tragedy began around 11 a.m. local time last Saturday, May 17, when police say 25-year-old Guy Edward Bartkus detonated his 2010 silver Ford Fusion outside the American Reproductive Centers in Palm Springs. The FBI called the explosion “probably the largest bombing scene that we’ve had in Southern California.” The blast, which injured four others and damaged buildings as far as 250 feet away, left only one casualty: Bartkus.

    Click Like if you are pro-life to like the LifeNews Facebook page!

    (function(d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js#xfbml=1&version=v2.10"; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); }(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));

    Those seeking answers heard FBI Assistant Director Akil Davis of the Los Angeles Field Office say Sunday that Bartkus expressed “nihilistic ideations” while carrying out “an intentional act of terrorism.” In fact, Bartkus expounded an all-encompassing anti-life philosophy known as Efilism, longed to initiate “a war against pro-lifers,” and once vowed “I’d choose Satan” over Jesus Christ.

    Bomber: ‘I’d Choose Satan’ over the Christian God

    Bartkus reportedly left behind recordings and a manifesto on a website describing himself as a “pro-mortalist”: He believed life brings pain and should be ended as quickly as possible. To further his philosophy, Bartkus wanted to start “a war against pro-lifers” and “begin the process of sterilizing this planet of the disease of life.”

    When someone raised the possibility of his spending eternity in Hell, Bartkus responded: “Your [G]od definitely doesn’t exist, but if [H]e did, I’d choose [S]atan over your evil [G]od. Did you ever think that maybe the [B]ible is just slander against [S]atan, and that [S]atan just realized what a f****** creep your [G]od is?”

    “[R]eligion is retarded,” he concluded.

    At a minimum, the fact that a pro-Satanic, anti-life radical perpetrated the first IVF facility bombing (of which we’re aware) should quell Democratic claims that pro-life Christians are waging a “war on IVF.”

    Democrats: Pro-life Republicans Waging ‘War on IVF’

    Ever since an Alabama Supreme Court ruled that a couple could sue for the loss of an embryo, the Left has fear-mongered about a purported war on IVF. Joe Biden fibbed in his 2024 State of the Union Address, “The Alabama Supreme Court shut down IVF treatments across the state, unleashed by a Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. Wade.” Kamala Harris repeatedly tried to insert the issue into the 2024 presidential campaign. The Democrat-to-legacy-media pipeline fed the narrative all year:

    • “Remember the war on IVF, abortion, reproductive care is really a war on women’s rights,” lectured Ohio State Rep. Anita Somani (D-8) last February.
    • Arwa Mahdawi, a columnist for the far-Left U.K. website The Guardian, wrote about “the holy war on IVF” last February.
    • “The Conservative War on IVF Means More Stigma for People Like Me,” claimed Natalie Albaran in Cosmopolitan last December.
    • “As someone who went through nine rounds of IVF, saw 10 fertility doctors and underwent treatment in both the U.S. and Israel over four years to create embryos that resulted in our daughter in 2015, I have been sounding the alarm bells for years about the religious right’s war on IVF,” wrote Amy Klein, condemning a position taken by the Southern Baptist Convention and the Roman Catholic Magisterium, in a column for The Forward last June.
    • “Katie Britt Keeps Trying to Distance the GOP From Its War on IVF,” asseverated Kylie Cheung of the website Jezebel.

    In reality, the IVF facility bombing was the work of another odd, left-wing movement espousing violence which the Biden administration apparently left untroubled — much like the murder of Border Patrol Agent David “Chris” Maland on January 20, allegedly by members of a transgender cult known as the “Zizians.”

    Rather than investigate them, during the Biden-Harris-autopen administration, “the FBI singled out Americans who are pro-life, pro-family, and support the biological basis for sex and gender distinction as potential domestic terrorists,” explained a 17,019-page report from the House subcommittee on weaponization of the government. Biden’s DHS awarded federal grants to organizations that linked Christian broadcasters to neo-Nazis. Biden’s targets were pro-life counselors, “violent extremists in radical-traditionalist Catholic” churches, alleged Russian infiltration of the growing Eastern Orthodox Church, and January 6 suspects. “Terrorism from white supremacy is the most lethal threat to the homeland today,” said Biden. (Ditto Merrick Garland and Christopher Wray.) For all his myopic emphasis, we still know remarkably little, publicly, about President Trump’s two would-be assassins (although the second, Ryan Routh, spouted Trump-hating clichés while repeatedly claiming he visited Ukraine to recruit soldiers for its military). “He believed the rhetoric of Biden and Harris, and he acted on it,” said President Trump of Routh.

    The Democrats, in turn, have internalized the broader points of anti-natalism and evangelized for the cause at every opportunity.

    Liberals Worried America Will ‘Return to Being a Christian Nation’ and ‘Producing a Lot of Children’

    In a recently aired video from May 1, Hillary Clinton warned darkly that the second Trump administration wants America to “return to the family — the nuclear family — return to being a Christian nation, return to producing a lot of children.” (The horrors.) Nor is her view an outlier in her party, deeply mired in environmental pessimism bleeding over into Malthusianism. In 2019, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) cited an elusive “scientific consensus that the lives of children are going to be very difficult,” which allegedly raised a “basic moral question” for every U.S. citizen: “Is it okay to still have children?” Similarly, Bernie Sanders promised Democratic primary voters in 2019 that reducing the number of babies born, “especially in poor countries,” is “something I very, very strongly support.” (At roughly the same time, Elon Musk forecast more accurately, “The biggest issue in 20 years will be population collapse.”)

    The climate-driven anti-natalist hysteria got so bad that a leading United Nations climate scientist lamented, “The atmosphere created by the media has been provoking anxiety. The latest idea is that children are a negative thing.” Petteri Taalas, then-secretary-general of the U.N.’s special agency on weather and climate, the World Meteorological Organization, asked liberals to stop reading climate change statements “in a similar way to the Bible” (good advice!), seeking to “try to find certain pieces or sections from which you try to justify your extreme views.” He encouraged young people, in essence, to stop worrying and have babies.

    The greatest threat to safety is palpable disregard for the sanctity of human life ingrained in federal law since January 1973 and embraced as the only meaningful policy articulated in the Democrats’ last presidential campaign. The second greatest threat is the decision to ignore a growing terrorist threat on the Left while weaponizing the government against every politically disfavored segment of the American Right. U.S. citizens should rejoice they now have a government seeking their physical safety, not the president’s political advantage. The ultimate end of President Trump’s alleged “revenge tour” has stanched the Left’s instrumentalization of the federal police force in a four-year cycle of vengeance.

    Sadly, IVF Clinics Kill More Embryos than Bartkus

    It is not at all clear Republicans will rise to the challenge of defending life. The GOP, always eager to flee the Democrats’ evolving calumnies, have positioned themselves as inventors of IVF. The president issued an executive order asking for policy proposals within 90 days — which elapsed Monday. IVF carries deep, ethical challenges.

    Ironically, had Bartkus waited, the IVF facility would have done most of his work for him. There are a panoply of ethical and moral issues with IVF, not least the fact that parents intentionally end the lives of most embryos and stand at high risk of miscarriage. Even the media response reveals some of this.

    What a Life-Hating Bomber, First Responders, and the Bible Can Teach Us about Life

    One silver lining shone through all the coverage of the IVF bombing: “We were able to save all of the embryos at this facility,” beamed Davis. “Good guys: one. Bad guys: zero.”

    Why announce this if embryos hold no value in themselves? The legacy media’s (usually) unspoken assumption holds that unborn babies’ worth is entirely contingent on the value imputed by their parents (read: mother). If their parents (read: mother) wants the child to live, the embryo’s loss represents a tragedy; if their parents (read: mother) do not want the child to live, the child’s death or abandonment is a neutral, or positive, development.

    The people who teach the most about the value of life may well be the first responders and the perpetrator himself.

    Local media reported that the moment Deputy Fire Chief Greg Lyle arrived at the site of the blast, he began “saying saving the embryos was non-negotiable.” He rushed into the facility, although it had suffered structural damage, and realized he had to restore the power to maintain the temperature of the tanks that stored the frozen embryos at -321 degrees Fahrenheit. KQED reported Lyle and his team “put their lives on the line to make sure the embryos survived.” In the process, they won a public commendation from Palm Springs Fire Chief Paul Alvarado, who said, “Despite the building suffering structural collapse, this was nothing short of heroic, and I’m so proud of our firefighters.”

    No one asked why the force should risk multiple lives to rescue so many “clumps of cells.”

    Ironically, Bartkus’s immediate motivation apparently came from the pain death inflicts. In his online manifesto, Bartkus wrote that 27-year-old Sophie Tinney of Fox Island, Washington, apparently convinced her boyfriend (29-year-old Lars Eugene Nelson) to “shoot her in her sleep.” “Recently my best friend Sophie killed herself (she got the guy she was living with to shoot her while she was sleeping, her preferred method),” he wrote. “I’ve never related to someone so much, and can’t imagine I ever would again. It’s just too much of a loss when there’s nobody else you really relate to significantly.” One personality trait that bound them was their shared borderline personality disorder.

    Even Bartkus, in his grief-ridden (and likely demon-possessed) state, recognized the value and impact of a human life. For Christians, the thoughts that should guide us include:

    • “Lo, children are an heritage of the Lord: and the fruit of the womb is his reward. As arrows are in the hand of a mighty man; so are children of the youth. Happy is the man that hath his quiver full of them” (Psalm 127:3-5).
    • “Before I formed you in the womb I knew you; Before you were born I sanctified you” (Jeremiah 1:5).
    • “The Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul” (Genesis 2:7).
    • “I am fearfully and wonderfully made: marvelous are thy works” (Psalm 139:14).
    • “There is no God besides Me; I kill, and I make alive” (Deuteronomy 32:39).
    • “Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends” (John 15:13).

    We must take every legislative and administrative means to save unborn children. And one day, like the first responders in Palm Springs, justly go down in history as the heroes and champions of life.

    LifeNews Note: Ben Johnson is senior reporter and editor at The Washington Stand.

    The post IVF Clinic Bomber Wanted to Wage a “War Against Pro-Lifers” appeared first on LifeNews.com.

  13. Site: Mises Institute
    2 days 3 hours ago
    Author: Brion McClanahan
    Brion McClanahan dismantles the so-called "righteous cause" narrative that shapes modern American history and foreign policy, tracing its roots from Sumner and Lincoln to the war in Iraq.
  14. Site: Zero Hedge
    2 days 3 hours ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    Comey Peddles Unbelievable Excuse For His '8647' Sea Shell Post...

    Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity.news,

    Disgraced former FBI Director James Comey is playing dumb and innocent after essentially calling for President Trump to be assassinated last week, claiming he had no idea his post would be so controversial.

    After Comey posted an image of shells on a beach he arranged to read ‘8647’, meaning get rid of Trump, The Secret Service questioned him, but then let him go without any charges.

    Now, in an interview with MSNBC he claims he’s just a silly old fella who wears baggy jeans and sweaters and had no idea what he was doing.

    “I don’t know how we ended up here. Never occurred to me that it was any kind of controversial thing, but that’s the time we live in,” Comey told MSNBC’s Nicolle Wallace.

    It’s got nothing to do with the time we live in, shit posting an image threatening to kill the President when you’re a deep state lackey is always going to cause outrage.

    Comey then claimed that he wasn’t the one who arranged the shells, and they were put there by some other TDS addled leftist.

    “We were walking on the beach, we went to the beach to prepare for this week… and we were walking back towards the road and we saw in the sand someone had arranged shells with numbers. And Patrice, my wife, said, ‘why would someone put an address in the sand?’ and I said, ‘I don’t know’ and we stood over and I said, ‘I think it’s some kind of political message.'”

    Hurling his own wife under a bus, Comey then added, “She said you know, when I was a server – she did a lot of work in restaurants – 86 meant to remove an item from the menu when you ran out of ingredients. And I said, ‘well to me, as a kid it always meant to leave a place, to ditch a place.’ And she said well that’s very clever you should take a picture of that and I did and posted it on my Instagram and thought nothing more of it until I heard through her that people were saying that it was a call for some sort of assassination which is crazy!”

    Pfffffft, SURE.

    James Comey addresses his “8647” threat against Trump: “We were walking along the beach and we saw on the sand someone had arranged shells with numbers. I thought 86 meant to ditch a place.”

    What a FRAUD! pic.twitter.com/oTt5hQsu2v

    — TheBlaze (@theblaze) May 19, 2025

    He added, “I thought, what a clever way to express a political view.”

    The shells were the same color for each of the letters, the different colors for the letters. It took a lot of work. Somebody with artistic flair did that. And I have a hard time believing it was anybody with a a dark intention,” Comey asserted, adding “And it certainly was no dark intention on my part or my spouse’s part.”

    JUST IN: James Comey says he's just a silly old man who wears sweaters and jeans, and was so enamored with the random "clever" shells he "found" on the sand.

    Comey also boasted about his tax refund, which earned him $347.

    "I was a grandfather and an author wearing sweaters and… pic.twitter.com/xCPoLFRf9p

    — Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) May 19, 2025

    Aw shucks grandpa.

    Did the Secret Service really buy this BS?

    He thinks he's effing Mr. Rogers.

    — Geezus Man (@GeezusMan) May 20, 2025

    He probably hired a crisis management PR firm and there is no telling how many iterations went into that answer and how many times they rehearsed it.

    And it’s still laughable.

    — IT Guy (@ITGuy1959) May 19, 2025

    The full thing is here:

    Of course, Wallace didn’t bother asking him about this ‘coincidence’:

    Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.

    Tyler Durden Tue, 05/20/2025 - 12:20
  15. Site: Henrymakow.com
    2 days 3 hours ago

    woman-snake.png
    Donald Trump used this parable in 2016  to refer to immigration. The parable in full is here. 

    My friend and colleague Ken Adachi sent the following note and video defending Trump. 

    "NOW, we actually have a President who is trying to HELP the American Republic upright the Ship of State," Ken writes. "I'm very happy that we have the likes of Robert Barnes and David Frei to elucidate and expound on this amazing restoration of this Union."

    MAGA people like Ken Adachi suffer from Stockholm Syndrome. Despite all the evidence that Trump is a Chabad gangster, and blackmailed Mossad agent, evidence Trump does not hide, MAGA people think Trump is going to save America if they play nice and ignore that Trump is a party to Israel's genocide which he could stop in a minute. 
    Anyone who supports Trump is complicit in genocide. 

    Trump could expose the 2020 election rigging. Does he? No, because he was a party to it. I like that Trump is securing the border and de-dei'ing Amerika, but this is just to prepare the US to defend Israel.

    Ken Adachi--"I realize you don't like Trump and see him as another JWO puppet. However, I judge Trump based on his actions and intentions, and have a different view of who he is and what he's doing.  I stumbled upon a Canadian-born Jewish lawyer who relocated to Florida a few years ago who calls himself "Viva Frie" on Youtube (but true name is David Frei... [something[) just a few days after Trump took office. I've posted a number of his videos to my tiny Bitchute channel because I'm so taken with his commentary and that of his often co-host, Atty Robert Barnes. Barnes is ESPECIALLY sharp and perceptive and he's WHY I decided to send this note to you. I'm hoping I can interest you in this 29 minute video and consider posting it. I think you will be impressed if you give this guy a chance. I'm not going to be offended if you want to pass, since I would expect that. However, I thought I would give it a shot anyway since I think you will sooner or later come to view Trump  - and more importantly, what he is achieving - in a different light.  

    Atty Robt. Barnes Home Runs May 18, 2025 ~ Pam Bondi & Epstein Files, Trump Admin Sabotage Watch!

    https://old.bitchute.com/video/M1WwEw3C16QS/

    "I enjoy listening to both David Frei and Robert Barnes because of the HONESTY and CLARITY of their perceptions. Occasionally, Robert Barnes says something that that I don't wholly agree with, but that's rare. Most of the time, Robert Barnes is hitting one home run after another!  I'm so glad that Viva has a growing audience that gives a large number of people, around the world,  the OPPORTUNITY to listen to the cogent, astute, and razor-sharp observations of Robert Barnes.

     With the exception of Jan. 20, 2017 to Jan.20, 2021, We've been immersed in a Sea of Deception & Rank Betrayal for THIRTY TWO YEARS thanks to Bush 1, Clinton, Bush 2, Obama, and  Biden.. NOW, we actually have a President who is trying to HELP the American Republic upright the Ship of State and I'm very happy that we have the likes of Robert Barnes and David Frei to elucidate and expound on this amazing restoration of this Union.  I look forward to continued jubilation and infectious optimism growing with each passing day.  I hope that YOU can see it too!"    
    --


    But instead of saying thanks, that snake gave her a vicious bite...

    "I saved you," cried that woman
    "And you've bit me even, why?
    You know your bite is poisonous and now I'm going to die"
    "Oh shut up, silly woman," said the reptile with a grin
    "You knew damn well I was a snake before you took me in..."

    from Aug 1, 2021
    by Henry Makow PhD

    "You knew damn well I was a snake before you took me in..."
    The creation of the Federal Reserve in 1913. We gave our national credit cards to a cartel of Cabalist Jews and Freemasons (Satanists) dedicated our destruction. 

    "You knew damn well I was a snake before you took me in..."

    We allowed a satanic cult, Freemasonry, affiliated with the banking cartel to infiltrate every social institution. "We corrupt in order to control (and destroy)" is their motto.  

    "You knew damn well I was a snake before you took me in..."

    We allowed this corruption to spread to all the institutions necessary for the preservation and healthy development of society: government, the mass media, education, church, justice system, military, police.

    "You knew damn well I was a snake before you took me in..."

    bo-jo-jacob.jpeg
    We elected criminals and perverts, handpicked by the bankers because they can be controlled. Clinton. Biden. Obama. Trump. In Canada we elected Fidel Castro's son. In Uk, Bojo. In France, they elected Macron over LePen. 

    "You knew damn well I was a snake before you took me in..."

    We have had their masterplan, the Protocols of the Elders of Zion for more than 100 years but we believed their excuses. 

    "You knew damn well I was a snake before you took me in..."

    We allowed our defenders to be vilified or murdered without consequences. JFK. Charles Coughlin. Louis McFadden. We ignored the warnings of truthers. 

    "You knew damn well I was a snake before you took me in..."

    We let them destroy the twin towers on 9-11 killing over 3000 innocent Americans. Again no consequences. 

    "You knew damn well I was a snake before you took me in..."

    We let them spread homosexuality and undermine gender, marriage, and family. 

    "You knew damn well I was a snake before you took me in..."

    We let Communists, who are a branch of Freemasonry disguised as liberals, to operate freely. We turned our foreign policy over to Israel.

    "You knew damn well I was a snake before you took me in..."

    We allowed them to addict us to porn, and sex in general, to distract us from defending the institutions and values we hold dear.  

    "You knew damn well I was a snake before you took me in..."

    Yet you believed Bill Gates, Anthony Fauci, and good cop Donald Trump on the #scamdemic and need for lockdowns, masks, vaccines and -- coming soon -- internment camps. A pandemic with a death rate of one-quarter of one percent is a ruse, not a pandemic. 


    You get the picture. 

    You cannot expect a snake to take mercy on you just because you were negligent, gullible, craven, and feckless. 

    They are open about their plans in order to compromise us. They have succeeded. 

    Satanism has only one goal. To DESTROY.  We embraced the snake. We allowed Evil to invade. 

    Satan destroys his adherents. We are culpable.

    Now we must reap the whirlwind. 
    ---


    First Comment from R

    We didn't allow all these things. All of them were sneak attacks by liars, thieves, and murderers, aided from the inside by traitors, corrupted villains, and fake news media that have been lying to us for more than a hundred years. 

    Yes, we did elect criminals and perverts, but also only because of the fake news media that we trusted. Again because of the media, we didn't even know they were snakes before we took them in, at least not the giant snakes they turned out to be. No one chose what we have now. If we go down, it's not because we are culpable of choosing evil, but because we were too stupid to recognize the evil of these snakes. That's not quite the same thing, although the end result may be the same. But the guilt for the evil is exclusively on the snakes. 

    Don't try to load it on our shoulders by declaring us culpable. If we are culpable of anything, it's only for being too stupid, too trusting, too civilized. Those of us who see what's coming protest it in the loudest possible way. Sneak attacks are uncivilized, and in a universe that is decent, the treachery of that kind will not go unpunished. 

    To hell with you snakes, and all those who aid and abet you. You are "a people always under the wrath of the Lord". Malachi 1:4. Your only way out is to repent and become decent and civilized, else you will stay in darkness forever. That will be the judgment of God, and you know it.


  16. Site: Mises Institute
    2 days 4 hours ago
    Author: Wanjiru Njoya
    Wanjiru Njoya exposes how federal intervention fueled racial conflict and dismantled the South's social order—challenging modern myths with historical truth.
  17. Site: Fr. Z's Blog
    2 days 4 hours ago
    Author: frz@wdtprs.com (Fr. John Zuhlsdorf)
    Today is the feast of St. Aurea of Ostia, a martyr from the 2nd century about whom we know nothing for sure, except that she worked miracles, refused to sacrifice to the gods and was murdered in the 3rd c. … Read More →
  18. Site: LifeNews
    2 days 4 hours ago
    Author: Ben Johnson

    Voters in Missouri will have the opportunity to safeguard women’s health and babies lives from the abortion and transgender industry in a forthcoming statewide election. On May 14, Republicans in the state Senate overcame a Democratic filibuster to pass HJR 73, which would amend the state constitution — including a vague and expansive “right” establishing any “person’s fundamental right to reproductive freedom.”

    If approved, the new amendment would allow abortions only for rape, or incest up through 12 weeks of pregnancy, or thereafter in the case of medical emergency or fetal anomaly. It restricts state funds from most abortions, except for rape or incest, and does not affect miscarriages, ectopic pregnancies, or medical emergencies.

    Importantly, it allows the state to make laws “to ensure the health and safety of the pregnant mother,” including assuring abortion facilities maintain “clean and safe conditions” and that abortionists have admitting privileges to a local hospital. Last December, Jackson County Circuit Court Judge Jerri Zhang sided with Planned Parenthood, striking down numerous state pro-life protections including an informed consent requirement — a ruling Planned Parenthood called “a triumph.” A judge overturned additional licensing requirements on Valentine’s Day.

    HELP LIFENEWS SAVE BABIES FROM ABORTION! Please help LifeNews.com with a donation!

    “Planned Parenthood in Missouri has a recorded history” that includes “dirty abortion facilities, dried bloody equipment, rusty equipment, expired drugs, and unqualified personnel,” stated Missouri Right to Life PAC. “[B]ecause of Amendment 3, our Missouri Constitution would prevent a woman from suing anyone associated with their abortion for any reason.”

    Voters would have the opportunity to change their minds about Amendment 3, the so-called “Right to Reproductive Freedom Initiative,” which passed last November with a razor-thin 51.6% of the vote, winning by three points. It allows the state to permit abortion until viability, or later with a broad exception for the “health” of the mother.

    The measure’s vague language includes “the right to make and carry out decisions about all matters related to reproductive health care, including but not limited to … abortion.”

    An organization that facilitates abortions for minors filed suit to overturn all state parental consent laws, citing Amendment 3 in its 59-page legal brief in the circuit court of Jackson County, Missouri. The same county — as well as its largest city, Kansas City — have ordinances barring minors from seeking voluntary counseling sessions from professional counselors to reduce feelings of same-sex attraction or transgender identity (although they can pursue so-called “gender-affirming” counseling that encourages them to deny their birth sex).

    The forthcoming amendment also enshrines that no transgender surgeries, cross-sex hormones, or puberty-blocking drugs “shall be knowingly prescribed or administered for the purpose of gender transition to children under eighteen years of age.”

    In a similar case, three weeks after Ohioans adopted a controversial state amendment giving “[e]very individual” the constitutional “right” to make and carry out “reproductive decisions including but not limited to” abortion, Democrats in the Ohio House introduced a measure stating that “reproductive health care … means gender affirming care.”

    Three dozen House Democrats insisted the bill should be “ideally, crumpled up, thrown into a trash can, and set ablaze” for allegedly violating freedom of speech in a letter to House Chief Clerk Joe Engler on May 15.

    The bill contains a severability clause, so if a judicial activist deems one or more of the provisions “unconstitutional,” the rest of the resolution stands. All legal challenges would have to be heard in overwhelmingly Republican Cole County — which contains the state capital, Jefferson City.

    “Pro-life Missourians want to work to ‘Restore respect for women and babies in our Missouri Constitution,’” said Missouri Right to Life PAC. “Thank you for giving Missouri Right to Life and all Missourians the opportunity to vote again on LIFE!”

    LifeNews Note: Ben Johnson is senior reporter and editor at The Washington Stand.

    The post Missouri Amendment Will Restore Abortion Ban, Protect Babies appeared first on LifeNews.com.

  19. Site: LifeNews
    2 days 4 hours ago
    Author: Thomas Jipping

    School districts across the country require parental notice or consent before minors may go on a field trip or even receive a cough drop. But for years, the Supreme Court said that those same minors have a constitutional right to get an abortion with minimal, if any, parental involvement.

    Now, the legal tables may have finally turned. The U.S. and Florida supreme courts have said that neither the federal nor the Florida state constitution protects a right to abortion—and a Florida appeals court has now put parents’ right to direct their children’s upbringing back in its proper place.

    Since 2004, the Florida Constitution has prohibited the legislature from “limit[ing] or deny[ing] the privacy right guaranteed to a minor under the United States Constitution as interpreted by the United States Supreme Court.”

    HELP LIFENEWS SAVE BABIES FROM ABORTION! Please help LifeNews.com with a donation!

    Under state law, a minor can obtain an abortion without parental knowledge if a court deems her “sufficiently mature to decide whether to terminate her pregnancy” or decides that notification and consent would not be in her “best interest.”

    In this case, a pregnant minor living with her parents asked for such a judicial finding, hoping to get an abortion before Florida’s six-week limit without their knowledge. The court denied her request and she appealed

    Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier entered the case to assert and defend the parents’ rights—a task he accomplished when the appeals court unanimously affirmed the lower court’s decision to deny the minor’s request to keep her parents in the dark.

    “Whatever asserted constitutional abortion rights may have justified Florida’s judicial-waiver regime in the past,” the appeals court held, “[those] unequivocally have been repudiated by both the U.S. Supreme Court and the Florida Supreme Court.”

    In 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, holding that its decision to invent a right to abortion was “egregiously wrong” from “the day it was decided.” Two years later, the Florida Supreme Court held that the Florida Constitution’s protections for the right to privacy do not include abortion.

    Having pushed aside the interference of a fictional abortion right, the appeals court focused on the long-standing right of parents to direct the upbringing of their children. Specifically, it pointed to a “rich common-law tradition of empowering parents to order their children’s affairs, even over their children’s objections” that informs the Florida Constitution’s protection of parental rights.

    The court also cited the U.S. Supreme Court’s designation of parents’ right to the “care, custody, and control of their children” as “perhaps the oldest of the fundamental liberty interests” protected by the Fourteenth Amendment.

    “At a minimum,” the appeals court concluded, “the Fourteenth Amendment demands notice and an opportunity to be heard before a presumptively fit parent can be deprived of his or her right to be informed of and make medical decisions, including abortion decisions, for his or her child.” Laws empowering judges to make subjective exceptions “afford neither.”

    This decision may be appealed to the Florida Supreme Court; but regardless of that outcome, this ruling suggests a roadmap for challenging similar laws in other states that also undermine parents’ fundamental right to direct their children’s upbringing.

    The claim that minors can independently make a decision as profound as abortion has always been in jarring, especially in contrast to the presumption throughout the law that children cannot properly make far less significant decisions.

    As the Supreme Court put it in 2021, “A child’s ‘lack of maturity’ and ‘underdeveloped sense of responsibility’ lead to recklessness, impulsivity, and heedless risk-taking.” That’s simply the nature of childhood. The Supreme Court pretended otherwise when it was pushing a fake right to abortion—but even the justices cannot change human nature.

    Parents’ right to be involved in and direct their children’s upbringing faces attack on multiple fronts. During Roe v. Wade’s 50 years of life, countless babies were killed; families were pulled apart; and girls were left vulnerable. Thankfully, this decision points to a turn in a better direction.

    LifeNews Note: Thomas Jipping is a senior legal fellow with the Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies at The Heritage Foundation. This column originally appeared at Daily Signal.

    The post Florida Supreme Court Upholds Parents Rights on Abortion appeared first on LifeNews.com.

  20. Site: Zero Hedge
    2 days 4 hours ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    Schiff On Gold In A Multipolar Currency Regime

    Via SchiffGold.com,

    For now, the U.S. dollar still reigns supreme as the world’s reserve currency. But cracks in this hegemony are widening, and in the wake of de-dollarization, there’s a golden opportunity for the yellow metal to re-emerge as a neutral global reserve asset in a multipolar currency regime. 

    As nations like China, India, and Russia challenge the dollar’s monopoly, the rise of a multi-currency world underscores why physical gold is not just a hedge, but a strategic necessity.

    The dollar’s dominance, cemented by the 1944 Bretton Woods agreement, has rested on its role as the primary medium for international trade, oil pricing, and reserve holdings. Yet, its foundation is eroding. The U.S. national debt exceeds $33 trillion, with interest payments projected to hit $1 trillion annually next year. 

    Decades of quantitative easing have bloated the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet, diluting the dollar’s purchasing power. Meanwhile, geopolitical tensions—sanctions on Russia, trade disputes with China—have further fed global de-dollarization. Now we have high inflation, interest rates that are still way too low, and a ballooning debt. In fact, almost half of new debt in 2024 came from interest payments on the debt itself. In that scenario, it would be impossible for other countries not to start considering de-dollarization more seriously.

    That’s exactly what’s happening. Data from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) shows a steady decline in the dollar’s share of global foreign exchange reserves. Central banks keep stockpiling gold at a historic pace, especially in Poland and BRICS-aligned countries. As the rest of the world continues to lose trust in the dollar, they’ll bet on gold as a neutral, non-politicized asset.

    Look at Treasurys: they’ve been swinging wildly since Trump’s trade wars began and are now sitting over 4.5%.  The dollar’s exorbitant privilege has always been unsustainable, and with the world increasingly realizing that we can’t fix our fiscal mess, a multipolar currency regime is an unfolding reality. 

    As Peter Schiff recently said on X:

    The yield on 10-year Treasuries is back up to 4.5% as the U.S. dollar resumes its broad-based decline. Despite the trade truce, the world is losing confidence in the dollar and our ability to get our fiscal house in order. The consequences of de-dollarization will be profound.

    — Peter Schiff (@PeterSchiff) May 13, 2025

    A multipolar currency regime envisions a world where no single national currency dominates. China is increasingly pushing for different ways to exchange yuan instead of dollars. Russia’s push for gold-backed trade with other BRICS nations is also accelerating the shift. The 2024 BRICS summit floated proposals for a gold-linked trade unit, a direct challenge to the petrodollar.

    After years of exporting our inflation, taking advantage of cheap manufacturing elsewhere, and using the threat of war to enforce petrodollar supremacy, Trump claims we’re being “ripped off.” In reality, his policies are smashing through everything that has allowed America to enjoy our standard of living to begin with. Those are the same factors that have allowed the dollar to survive for so long.

    As nations diversify away from dollar-denominated assets, gold’s share in global reserves is climbing. 

    With the government’s culture of blatantly unsustainable borrowing trickling down to consumers, America’s unpayable debt cannot simply go on forever. Now other countries are not only realizing it, but acting on it. Though the story of unipolar dollar dominance was always bound to come to an end, in this case, the finale will be a spectacular collapse that upends the way of life Americans have become so accustomed to. 

    2008 was nothing, and neither was the Great Depression, compared to the end of the dollar’s reign. The longer it gets put off, the worse it will be in the end. However, for better or worse, it may be coming soon. As Peter recently said on Metals and Miners:

    “…stagflation, a combination of a weak economy and rising interest rates, is the one scenario that the Fed never stress tested any of the banks for…They did not run a stress test where you have a recession with high unemployment, but inflation and interest rates go up, not down.”

    The IMF reports that gold now accounts for significantly more of total reserves than it did a decade ago. Other countries know that gold is the ultimate safe haven, not US Treasurys. As the multipolar world takes shape, the dollar’s decline could trigger volatility in equities, bonds, and real estate—assets that are tethered to the stability of the dollar.

    Gold thrives in uncertainty. Its price has skyrocketed this year, outpacing inflation and most asset classes. However, its true value lies not in short-term gains, but in its role as a wealth preserver when currencies like the US dollar collapse under the weight of inflationary mismanagement and central planning hubris. 

    As demand for dollars goes down it will devalue U.S. assets, particularly Treasuries, which foreign entities hold to the tune of trillions. As the dollar’s shadow fades, gold reclaims its role as the world’s ultimate store of value—unchained, enduring, and essential.

    Tyler Durden Tue, 05/20/2025 - 11:40
  21. Site: Euthanasia Prevention Coalition
    2 days 4 hours ago

    v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);} Normal 0 false false false EN-CA X-NONE X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}

    Below please find Margaret Dore's expert witness memorandum, prepared for a South Africa court case, Suzanne Walter v. Ministry of Health. See also the comment below from a South African advocate:  

    A number of the points made by you are incisive and helpful. I found your interpretation of section 27 of the Constitution particularly useful.... The argument will, amongst others, find its way into the final legal argument before the High Court, and the courts that follow.

    To view Dore's original memorandum, click here. To view the memorandum's three-part appendix, click part 1part 2 and part 3.  

    I. INTRODUCTION  

    Oregon’s Death with Dignity Act was passed by a citizens initiative in 1994 and went into effect in 1997.[1] The Act was  promoted as limited to physician-assisted suicide, with euthanasia prohibited.[2] The Act, in fact, allows both practices, including on an involuntary basis. 

    The Act applies to persons aged 18 and up, predicted to have less than six months to live due to a terminal disease.[3] In practice, such persons may have years or decades to live. 

    The Act employs euphemistic language. Consider the word, “medication,” normally meaning a substance to cure or treat a disease or condition.[4] Per the Act, medication instead means a lethal dose to end a person’s life (kill the patient).[5] 

    II. DEFINITIONS

        A. Physician-Assisted Suicide; Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia 

    The Act does not define physician-assisted suicide, assisted suicide or euthanasia.[6] Per the American Medical Association, physician-assisted suicide occurs when “a physician facilitates a patient’s death by providing the necessary means and/or information to enable the patient to perform the life-ending act.”[7] For example:

    [T]he physician provides sleeping pills and information about the lethal dose, while aware that the patient may commit suicide.[8]

    Assisted suicide is a general term in which the assisting person is not necessarily a physician.  Euthanasia is the administration of a lethal agent by another person.[9] Euthanasia is also known as mercy killing.[10]

        B. Withholding or Withdrawing Treatment    

    Withholding or withdrawing treatment (“pulling the plug”) is not euthanasia if the purpose is to remove burdensome treatment, as opposed to an intent to kill the individual. More importantly, the individual will not necessarily die. Consider this quote regarding a man removed from a ventilator:

    [I]nstead of dying as expected, [he] slowly began to get better.[11]

    III. FACTUAL AND LEGAL BACKGROUND    
                
        A. Assisting Persons Can Have an Agenda

    Persons assisting a suicide or euthanasia can have an agenda. Consider Tammy Sawyer, trustee for Thomas Middleton in Oregon. Two days after his death by legal assisted suicide, she sold his home and deposited the proceeds into bank accounts for her own benefit.[12] Consider also Graham Morant, convicted of counselling his wife to kill herself in Australia, to get the life insurance.[13] The Court found:

    [Y]ou counselled and aided your wife to kill herself because you wanted ... the 1.4 million.[14]

    Medical professionals too can have an agenda. For an example closer to home, consider US physician, Mike Swango, who worked at the Mnene Lutheran Mission in Zimbabwe.[15] He allegedly poisoned patients to get a thrill.[16] He was eventually convicted of killing four patients in the US.[17] Consider also Harold Shipman, a doctor in the UK, who not only killed his patients, but stole from them and in one case made himself a beneficiary of the patient’s will.[18]

        B. Most US States Reject Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia

    In the US, 42 states do not allow assisted suicide and/or euthanasia. In 2016, the New Mexico Supreme Court overturned a lower court decision allowing physician aid in dying (meaning physician-assisted suicide).[19] In the last ten years, nine states have strengthened their laws against assisted suicide and/or euthanasia.[20]

        C. The Swiss Study: Assisted Suicide Can Be Traumatic for Family Members

    A European research study addressed trauma suffered by persons who witnessed legal physician-assisted suicide in Switzerland.[21] The study found that one out of five family members or friends present at an assisted suicide was traumatized. These people,

    experienced full or sub-threshold PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) related to the loss of a close person through assisted suicide.[22]

    IV. OREGON’S ACT APPLIES TO PEOPLE WITH YEARS OR DECADES TO LIVE

        A. Chronic Conditions Can Be Sufficient for Death Via the Act
        
    Oregon’s Act applies to people with a “terminal disease,” which is defined in terms of having less than six months to live. The Act states:  

    “Terminal disease” means an incurable and irreversible disease that has been medically confirmed and will, within reasonable medical judgment, produce death within six months.  (Emphasis added).[23]

    In practice, this definition applies to people with chronic conditions such as diabetes, who are dependent on medication such as insulin to live.[24] Oregon doctor, William Toffler, explains:

    In Oregon, people with chronic conditions are "terminal," if without their medications, they have less than six months to live. This is significant when you consider that a typical insulin-dependent 20 year-old will live less than a month without insulin. (Emphasis added).[25]

    Dr. Toffler adds:

    Such persons, with insulin, are likely to have decades to live. (Emphasis added).[26]

        B. Doctor Predictions of Life Expectancy Can Be Wrong    

    Eligible persons may also have years or decades to live because predictions of life expectancy can be wrong, sometimes way wrong. This is due to misdiagnosis and the fact that predicting life expectancy is not an exact science.[27] 

    Consider John Norton, who was diagnosed with ALS (Lou Gehrig’s disease) at age 18.[28] He was told that he would get progressively worse (be paralyzed) and die in three to five years.[29] Instead, the disease progression stopped on its own.[30] In a 2012 affidavit, at age 74, he states:

    If assisted suicide or euthanasia had been available to me in the 1950's, I would have missed the bulk of my life and my life yet to come.[31]

        C. Treatment Can Lead to Recovery

    Patients may also have years or decades to live because treatment can lead to recovery. Consider Oregon resident, Jeanette Hall, who was diagnosed with cancer in 2000 and made a settled decision to use the Oregon’s Act. Her doctor convinced her to be treated for cancer instead.[32] In a 2019 declaration, she states:

    It has now been 19 years since my diagnosis. If [my doctor] had believed in assisted suicide, I would be dead.[33]   

    V. HOW THE ACT WORKS
        
    The Act has an application process to obtain the lethal dose.”[34] Once the lethal dose is issued by the pharmacy, there is no oversight.[35] No doctor, not even a witness, is required to be present at the death.[36]

    VI. THE ACT IS STACKED AGAINST THE INDIVIDUAL

        A. Even If the Patient Struggled, Who Would Know?

    The Act has no required oversight over administration of the lethal dose.[37] The drugs used are water or alcohol soluble, allowing them to be injected into a sleeping or restrained person without consent.[38] Alex Schadenberg, Executive Director for the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition, puts it this way:

    With assisted suicide laws in ... Washington and Oregon, perpetrators can ... take a “legal” route, by getting an elder to sign a lethal dose request. Once the prescription is filled, there is no supervision over administration. Even if the patient struggled, “who would know?”  (Emphasis added).[39]       

        B. The Act Allows Other People to Communicate on the Patient’s Behalf

    The Act’s definition of “capable” allows other people to communicate on the patient’s behalf during the lethal dose request process. Such persons are not required to be the patient’s designated agent, such as a family member or guardian. The communicating person need only be “familiar with the patient’s manner of communicating.” The Act states:

    "Capable" means that in the opinion of a court or in the opinion of the patient’s attending physician or consulting physician, psychiatrist or psychologist, . . . a patient has the ability to make and communicate health care decisions to health care providers, including communication through persons familiar with the patient’s manner of communicating if those persons are available. (Emphasis added).[40]

    Being familiar with a patient’s manner of communicating is a minimal standard. Consider, for example, a doctor’s assistant who is familiar with the patient’s manner of communicating in Chinese, but the assistant herself does not understand Chinese. That, however, would be good enough for her to communicate (agree to the lethal dose) on the patient’s behalf. Patients are not in control of their fate.

        C. Attending Physician Responsibilities

    The Act enumerates responsibilities that the attending physician “shall” perform prior to writing a prescription for the lethal dose.[41] These responsibilities include making a determination as to whether the patient has a terminal disease, is capable and has made the initial determination to obtain the lethal dose voluntarily.[42] The Act however, also features a different message, that the attending physician shall:

    Ensure that all appropriate steps are carried out in accordance with [the Act]. (Emphasis added) .... [43]

    The Act does not define “appropriate” or “accordance.”[44] Dictionary definitions of appropriate include “suitable or proper in the circumstances.” Definitions of accordance include “in the spirit of,” meaning “in thought or intention.”[45] 

    With this language, the attending physician’s assessment of what is suitable or proper, or had a thought or intention to do, is good enough. 

    VII. THE ACT ALLOWS EUTHANASIA AS TRADITIONALLY DEFINED

    The Act refers to the lethal dose as “medication.”[46] Generally accepted medical practice allows doctors and family members to administer medication to a patient.[47] When the medication administered is a lethal dose, this is euthanasia as traditionally defined.[48]

    VIII. THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITY ACT WOULD TRUMP ANY PROHIBITION OF EUTHANASIA

    The Americans with Disability Act (ADA) is a US federal civil rights law “that prohibits discrimination against individuals with disabilities in every day activities, including medical services.”[49] Here, the Oregon Act describes prescribing the lethal dose as part of a medical practice, which renders it a medical service.[50]

    Per the ADA, medical care providers are required “to make their services available in an accessible manner.”[51] This includes:

    reasonable modifications to policies, practices, and procedures when necessary to make health care services fully available to individuals with disabilities, unless the modifications would fundamentally alter the nature of the services (i.e., alter the essential nature of the services). (Emphasis added).[52]

    Here, the fundamental nature of the service is the provision of medication (the lethal dose) to end a patient’s life. If for the purpose of argument, the Oregon Act could somehow be read as requiring self-administration, the ADA would require providers to make a reasonable modification of procedures for individuals unable to self-administer, so as to make the service fully available, for example, by providing the assistance of another person to administer the lethal dose. This is euthanasia as traditionally defined. 

    IX. CLINICAL PROBLEMS CAN AND DO LEAD TO EUTHANASIA

    In practice, physician-assisted suicide is not always successful to kill patients, which can lead to euthanasia. See, for example, Johanna H. Groenewoud, MD, et. al., “Clinical Problems with the Performance of Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide in the Netherlands,” New England Journal of Medicine, 24 February 2000. 

    X. DEATHS ARE “NATURAL” AS A MATTER OF LAW

        A. The Oregon Department of Health Recommends Reporting the Death as Natural

    The Oregon Department of Health recommends that deaths per the Death with Dignity Act be reported as “natural.”[53] This result is also required as matter of law, which is explained is in the next section.

        B. The Death Must Be Reported as Natural

    Oregon’s death certificate statute has six categories for reporting the manner of death, five of which are substantive: (1) natural; (2) accidental; (3) suicidal; (4) homicidal; and (5) legal intervention.[54] Legal intervention means an execution pursuant to ORS 137.463 (death warrant hearing) and other legal uses of force resulting in death.[55]

    Per the Death with Dignity Act, death occurring in accordance with the Act does not constitute suicide or homicide as a matter of law.[56] The death is also not an accident or legal intervention. This leaves natural. The manner of death is natural as a matter of law.

    XI. DR. SHIPMAN AND THE CALL FOR DEATH CERTIFICATE REFORM

    Per a 2005 article in the UK’s Guardian newspaper, there was a public inquiry regarding Dr. Shipman’s conduct, which determined that he had “killed at least 250 of his patients over 23 years.”[57] The inquiry also found:

    that by issuing death certificates stating natural causes, the serial killer [Shipman] was able to evade investigation by coroners. (Emphasis added).[58]

    Per a subsequent article in 2015, proposed reforms included having a medical examiner review death certificates, so as to improve patient safety.[59] Oregon instead has moved in the opposite direction to require that deaths be reported as natural.

    XII. OREGON RESIDENTS HAVE BEEN RENDERED SITTING DUCKS TO THEIR HEIRS AND OTHER PREDATORS

    Per Oregon inheritance law, a “slayer” of the decedent is not allowed to inherit from a person that he or she kills.[60] The rational is that a criminal should not be allowed to benefit from his or her crime.[61]  Under the Oregon Death with Dignity Act, however, a person who intentionally kills another person is allowed to inherit. This is due to the death being certified as natural.

    With the passage of the Act, Oregon residents with money, meaning the middle class and above, have been rendered sitting ducks to their heirs and other financial predators.

    XIII. ANN JACKSON’S TESTIMONY MUST BE DISALLOWED

        A. No Claimed Legal Training

    I have been provided with the following documents regarding Ms. Jackson’s opinion as to the Oregon Death with Dignity Act:  

        (1) Sheena Swemmer, Centre for Applied Legal Studies’ Summary Notice in Terms of Rule 36(9)(b), 20 April 2020 (CALS 9, attached in the appendix at pages 66 to 82);

        (2) Ann Jackson, M.B.A., Bio Curriculum Vitae, 19 May 2019 (CALS 3, attached in the appendix at pages at 84 to 97); and  

        (3) Ann Jackson, “Supporting Affidavit,” 23 February 2016, submitted in Minister of Justice and Correctional Service and Others v Estate Late James Stransham-Ford  (531/2015) (CALS 2, attached at pages 98 to 126) (Emphasis added).

    All three documents describe Ms. Jackson’s education as: (1) “Bachelor of Science, Elementary Education,” and (2) “Master of “Business Administration, Not-for-Profit Management.” 

    Per these documents, Ms. Jackson makes no claim to legal training and/or as to being qualified to give a legal opinion regarding Oregon’s Act. 

        B. Oregon’s Act Does Not Require Self-Administration

    Ms. Jackson’s supporting affidavit says that the patient "must be able to self-administer [the lethal dose]."[62] 

    CALS makes a similar representation, stating:

    [T]he patient must be able to self-administer and ingest the medication themselves. (Emphasis added).[63]

    There is no such requirement in Oregon’s Act.[64] Indeed, the Act does not and has never used the term, “self-administer.” A proposal to add the term in 2019 failed.[65] Ms. Jackson’s purported expert opinion, claiming that the Act requires self-administration, which has now been endorsed by CALS, is false and must be disallowed. 

        C. The Act Is Not Limited to Dying People

    Ms. Jackson’s affidavit describes Oregon’s Act as having legalised “physician-assisted dying.”[66]  Indeed, her affidavit uses the term at least 10 times.[67] CALS’ Summary Notice similarly describes the Act as having to do with dying, i.e., by repeatedly using the term “medical aid-in-dying.”[68]

    The Oregon Act, itself, does not use the word “dying.”[69] More importantly, the Act instead has a six months to live criteria, which in practice applies to people with years or decades to live.[70] Ms. Jackson’s affidavit and the CALS’ Summary Notice, both of which repeatedly imply that the Act is limited to dying people, are materially misleading. For this reason also, Ms. Jackson’s opinion and the CALS document are false and misleading and must be disallowed.

        D. Misreading the Act

    Ms. Jackson’s supporting affidavit states that patients can “only” be prescribed the lethal dose “after meeting with a number of legal safeguards,” which include:

          b. The patient must be mentally competent; and     
        
          c. The patient must be diagnosed with a terminal illness or condition that will lead to their death within 6 months.

    The Act, in fact, uses different terminology. Patients are described as “capable,” not “competent.” Moreover, as discussed supra, capable is a specially defined term, allowing another person to speak for the patient during the lethal dose request process.
        
    XIV.  THE PROPOSED RIGHT TO DIE

        A. Overview

    The Centre for Applied Legal Studies (CALS) seeks to establish a “right to die” in South Africa. If granted, the right will allow the non-voluntary killing of South African persons. For this reason alone, the proposed right must be rejected and the case dismissed. 

        B.  The Proposed Right to Die must Be Rejected

            1. Establishing a right to die will lead to involuntary killing, which is unconstitutional

    The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, Chapter 2, sets forth a Bill of Rights, including Section 11, titled “Life.” The section simply states:  “Everyone has the right to life.” 

    Consistent therewith, the Republic of South Africa supports suicide prevention efforts, to preserve life.[71] Indeed, the South Africa Mental Health Care Act allows the non-voluntary commitment of suicidal individuals, to prevent their suicides.[72] CALS instead wants to establish a right to die. In 2016, the Supreme Court of New Mexico (USA) addressed the practical consequence of such a right, that it would lead to involuntary euthanasia. The Court stated:

    [W]e agree with the legitimate concern that recognizing a right to physician aid in dying [meaning physician-assisted suicide] will lead to voluntary or involuntary euthanasia because if it is a right, it must be made available to everyone, even when a duly appointed surrogate makes the decision, and even when the patient is unable to self-administer the life-ending medication... (Emphasis added).[73]

    For this reason alone, the proposed right to die must be rejected.  

             2. Section 27 of the South Africa Constitution, providing a right to health care services, does not support a right to die

    Z v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service (13472) [2014] ZATC 2 (18 November 2014), states:

    The rule of construction known as the ejusdem generis-rule is sometimes expressed by the maxim noscitur a sociis, that is the measuring of a word may be ascertained by reference to those associated with it.  In other words, where two or more words which are susceptible of analogous meaning are coupled noscitur a sociis, they are understood to be used in their cognate sense. They take, as it were, their colour from each other, that is, the more general is restricted to a sense analogous to the less general. (Emphasis Added, Spacing Changed).

    CALS argues that denial of the right to die is an unjustifiable limitation on the right to health set forth in Section 27 of the South Africa Constitution, titled “Health Care, Food, Water and Social Security.”[74]  Section 27(1) states:

    (1) Everyone has the right to have access to
        (a) health care services, including reproductive health care;
        (b) sufficient food and water; and
        (c) social security, including, if they are unable to support themselves and their dependents, appropriate social assistance (Emphasis added).[75]

    Per the above rule of construction, the general phrase in subsection (a), “health care services, including reproductive health care,” must be restricted to a sense analogous to the less general terms in subsections (b) and (c), both of which support life, i.e., through “sufficient food and water” and “social security, including ... appropriate social assistance.”

    More to the point, Section 27 is concerned with promoting life, not death. For this reason, Section 27 cannot somehow be read as promoting the claimed right to die. For this reason also, the proposed right to die must fail.

    XV. CONCLUSION

    In the event this court recognizes the proposed right to die, the right will necessarily include involuntary euthanasia. This will similarly be true in the event this court would order the adoption of an Oregon-style Death with Dignity Act.

    Assisting persons, including doctors and family members, can have an agenda, with the more obvious reasons being inheritance and life insurance, but also, as in the case of Dr. Swango, the thrill of seeing someone die. 

    I urge you to reject the proposed right to die. 

                Dated this 29th day of January 2021,

                Margaret Dore, Esq., MBA

    Endnotes

    To view original memo, click here. To view the memo's appendix, click Part 1 pages 1-43Part 2 to page 84 and Part 3 to page 126

    [1]  “Oregon’s Death with Dignity Act: The First Year’s Experience,” 18 February 1999, excerpts attached at appendix pages 1 to 3.  Information about the initiative is attached at page 3. 

    [2]  Appendix page 3, third paragraph, last sentence.

    [3]  Appendix pages 4 to 13. 

    [4]  See “What is Medication?,” appendix page 14.

    [5]  See the Act: “Written Request for Medication to End One’s Life ....,” at  appendix page 5.

    [6]  See the Act in its entirety, appendix pages 4 to 13.

    [7]  The AMA Code of Medical Ethics, Opinion 5.7, appendix page 15.

    [8]  Id.

    [9]  The AMA Code of Medical Ethics, Opinion 5.8, appendix page 16.

    [10] See mercy killing definition, appendix page 17.

    [11] Nina Shapiro, “Terminal Uncertainty — Washington's new 'Death with Dignity' law allows doctors to help people commit suicide — once they've determined that the patient has only six months to live.  But what if they're wrong?,” The Seattle Weekly, 13 January 2009; in the appendix, beginning at page 18; quote at appendix page 20.

    [12] "Sawyer Arraigned on State Fraud Charges," KTVZ.COM, 07 September 2011, appendix page 22.

    [13] R v Morant [2018] QSC 251, Order, 2 November 2018, excerpts available at appendix pages 23 and 24. Full opinion available here: https://archive.sclqld.org.au/qjudgment/2018/QSC18-251.pdf 

    [14] Id. at appendix page 24, ¶ 78. 

    [15] Joseph Geringer, “Michael Swango: Doctor of Death,” Crime Library on truTV.com, 27 June 1997, posted https://www.davidcoltart.com/1997/06/michael-swango-doctor-of-death

    [16] Id. 

    [17] Cf. Charlie Leduff, “Prosecutors Say Doctor Killed to Feel a Thrill,” The New York Times, 7 Sept 2000, appendix pages 25 to 27, https://choiceisanillusion.files.wordpress.com/2019/03/ny-times-killed-to-feel-a-thrill-1.pdf (“Basically, Dr. Swango liked to kill people.  By his own admission in his diary, he killed because it thrilled him.”) 

    [18] David Batty, “Q & A: Harold Shipman,” The Guardian, 25 August 2005, at https://www.theguardian.com/society/2005/aug/25/health.shipman and appendix pages 28 to 30.

    [19] Morris v, Brandenburg, 376 P.3d 836 (2016).

    [20] Margaret Dore, “U.S. States Strengthen Their Laws Against Assisted Suicide, April 2, 2019, appendix page 31.

    [21] “Death by request in Switzerland: Posttraumatic stress disorder and complicated grief after witnessing assisted suicide,” B. Wagner, J. Muller, A. Maercker; European Psychiatry 27 (2012) 542-546, available at http://choiceisanillusion.files.wordpress.com/2012/10/family-members-traumatized-eur-psych-2012.pdf  

    [22] Id.

    [23] Or. Rev. Stat. 127.800 §1.01(12), appendix page 5.

    [24] See excerpt from Oregon’s annual report for year 2019 (listing “diabetes” as an underlying illness sufficient for death via the Act). Available at appendix page 34.

    [25] Declaration of William Toffler, MD, 20 April 2017, appendix pages 35 to 39; the quote is set forth at appendix page 36, ¶ 5.

    [26] Id., ¶ 6. 

    [27] Cf. Jessica Firger, “12 million Americans misdiagnosed each year,” CBS NEWS, 17 April 2014, attached hereto at appendix page-40; and Nina Shapiro, “Terminal Uncertainty — Washington's new 'Death with Dignity' law allows doctors to help people commit suicide — once they've determined that the patient has only six months to live. But what if they're wrong?,” The Seattle Weekly, 14 January 2009.  (Excerpts available at appendix pages 18 to 21).

    [28] Affidavit of John Norton, ¶ 1 (Attached hereto at appendix pages 41-43).

    [29] Id., ¶ 1.

    [30] Id., ¶ 4.

    [31] Id., ¶ 5.

    [32] Declaration of Kenneth Stevens, MD, appendix pages 44 to 46; Jeanette Hall discussed at 44 and 45.  Hall declaration available at appendix page 47. 

    [33] Attached hereto at appendix page 47.

    [34] The Act, 127.805 § 201 to 127.860 § 310, at appendix pages 5 through 8.

    [35] See the Act in its entirety, at appendix pages 4 to 13.

    [36] Id.

    [37] See the Act in its entirety, at appendix pages 4 through 13.

    [38] See Oregon report excerpt at appendix page 48 (listing Secobarbital and Phenobarbital as drugs used to kill patients in Oregon). Per Drugs.com, Secobarbital is both water and alcohol soluble, while Phenobarbital is soluble in alcohol. Supporting documentation in appendix pages 49 and 50.

    [39] Alex Schadenberg, Letter to the Editor, “Elder abuse a growing problem,” The Advocate, Official Publication of the Idaho State Bar, October 2010.

    [40] The Act, Section 1, 127.800 § 1.01(3), at appendix page 4.

    [41] See the Act, Section 3, attached at appendix page 6.

    [42] Id., 127.815 § 3.01(1)(a) 

    [43] The Act, Section 3, 127.815 § 3.01 (1)(k), appendix page 6. 

    [44] See the Act in its entirety, appendix pages 4 to 13.

    [45] Definitions attached at appendix pages 51 and 52.

    [46] See, for example, the Act, 127.805 § 2.01 (describing “medication” as being “for the purpose of ending [the patient’s] life”). Appendix page 5. 

    [47] Declaration of Kenneth Stevens, MD, 6 January 2016, ¶¶ 9-10, appendix page 46.

    [48] Cf. AMA Code of Medical Ethics, Opinion 5.8, appendix page 16 (“Euthanasia is the administration of a lethal agent by another person”).

    [49] U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, Disability Rights Section and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, “Americans with Disabilities Act: Access to Medical Care for Individuals with Mobility Disabilities,” July 2010, excerpts at appendix pages 53 and 54.  Also available at https://www.ada.gov/medcare_mobility_ta/medcare_ta.htm 

    [50] See the Oregon Act, located at appendix pages 4 to 13.

    [51] U.S. Department of Justice, supra, attached hereto at appendix page 54.

    [52] Id.

    [53] See Oregon Health Authority website FAQ, as of 24/01/21 (stating: “The Oregon Health Authority, Center for Health Statistics recommends that physicians record the underlying terminal disease as the cause of death and mark the manner of death ‘natural.’”), available at https://www.oregon.gov/oha/PH/PROVIDERPARTNERRESOURCES/EVALUATIONRESEARCH/DEATHWITHDIGNITYACT/Pages/faqs.aspx#deathcert 

    [54] OR Rev Stat § 146.003, appendix page 57.

    [55] Id.

    [56] The Act, 127.880 § 3.14 states:
        
            Actions taken in accordance with [the Act] shall not, for any            purpose, constitute suicide, assisted suicide, mercy killing or            homicide, under the law. (Emphasis added)

    [57] David Batty, “Q & A: Harold Shipman,” The Guardian, 08/25/05, at https://www.theguardian.com/society/2005/aug/25/health.shipman. (Attached hereto in the appendix at pages 58 to 60). 

    [58] Id., appendix page 60.

    [59] Press Association, “Death Certificate Reform Delays ‘Incomprehensible,” The Guardian, 21 January 2015, appendix pages 61 and 62.

    [60] ORS 112.465, “Slayer or abuser considered to predecease decedent,” copy available at appendix page 63.

    [61] Cf. Ilene S. Cooper and Jaclene D'Agostino, "Forfeiture and New York's 'Slayer Rule', NYSBA Journal, March/April 2015 

    [62] CALS 2, appendix pages 105 to 106, paragraph 23. 

    [63] CALS 9 Summary Notice, page 9, ¶ 3.3.6.7

    [64] See Oregon’s Act in its entirety

    [65] Oregon House Bill 2232 (2019), available at https://olis.oregonlegislature.gov/liz/2019R1/Downloads/MeasureDocument/HB2232/Introduced   

    [66] Supporting Affidavit of Ann Jackson, pp 1 to 15, appendix page 98 through page 112.

    [67] Id.

    [68] See CALS Summary Notice at pp. 2-5.

    [69] Do a word search, it’s not there.

    [70] See Dore Memo submitted herewith.

    [71] See e.g., South Africa Government Newsroom Release, promoting “World Suicide Prevention Day,” issued 10 September 2020. 

    [72] https://www.justice.gov.za/legislation/acts/2002-017_mentalhealthcare.pdf

    [73] Morris v. Brandenburg, 376 P.3d 836, 838-839 (2016)

    [74] Sheena Justine Swemmer, CALS, Founding Affidavit Application to Adduce Evidence, ¶¶ 15.5 to 15.8.

    [75] The Constitution can be viewed in its entirety, at this link: https://justice.gov.za/legislation/constitution/SAConstitution-web-eng.pdf

  22. Site: AsiaNews.it
    2 days 5 hours ago
    After 2,454 days unjustly behind bars, the former senator and minister of Justice is back in Congress, in the House of Representatives this time. With the opposition party, Mamamayang Liberal (ML), she will challenge the political oligarchies of the Duterte and Marcos clans. For the families of the victims of the war on drugs, she represents hope for justice. Hers is 'A fragile mandate that carries the weight of people's hopes'.
  23. Site: non veni pacem
    2 days 5 hours ago
    Author: Mark Docherty
  24. Site: Catholic Conclave
    2 days 5 hours ago
    In Essen, in the northern part of the city centre, the Church of St. Gertrud will become the new home of the University of Fine Arts. The Diocese of Essen has sold the church. The congregation is moving into the cathedral. Art is now being created in the church.Essen city centre to become new home for the University of Fine ArtsThe University of Fine Arts in Essen has been searching for a new Catholic Conclavehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06227218883606585321noreply@blogger.com0
  25. Site: Mises Institute
    2 days 6 hours ago
    Author: Kevin Duffy
    President Trump has invoked the ancient fallacies of mercantilism in fashioning his protectionist trade policies. We will find that mercantilism is just as harmful today than it was hundreds of years ago when it first became Britain‘s national policy.
  26. Site: southern orders
    2 days 6 hours ago

     St. Peter’s Square is prepared for tremendous crowds at Pope Leo XIV Wednesday audience. During the reign of Pope Francis, there usually were chairs only in the first section and maybe a few in the second, but never were there chairs in the third section all the way past the obelisk! 

    This is a screen shot I just took from the Vatican YouTube live feed:




  27. Site: Steyn Online
    2 days 6 hours ago
    The Mark Steyn Club has just celebrated its eighth birthday. We thank all the First Fortnight Founding Members who've decided to re-up for a ninth season with us - and we hope our First Month members will want to do the same as May chunkers on. I'll be
  28. Site: Steyn Online
    2 days 6 hours ago
    Programming note: Tomorrow, Wednesday, I'll be hosting another edition of our Clubland Q&A taking questions from Steyn Clubbers live around the planet at 3pm North American Eastern - that's 8pm British Summer Time/9pm Central European. ~Thank you for
  29. Site: AsiaNews.it
    2 days 6 hours ago
    A process of revision of school textbooks has been announced to mark the eightieth anniversary of independence in August. Critics slam the initiative as an attempt to rehabilitate the late military dictator Suharto by omitting some controversial episodes involving the current president. The impact on the new generations is particularly worrisome since they have no direct memory of the regime's crimes and because of this, they tend to support Prabowo.
  30. Site: Ron Paul Institute - Featured Articles
    2 days 6 hours ago
    Author: Larry C. Johnson

    Donald Trump is refusing to follow the Zelensky/European script for trapping Russia. The leaders of the UK, France, Germany and Poland made a desperate effort to get Trump to demand to Russia accept an unconditional, 30-day ceasefire, or face a new round of bone-crushing sanctions. Zelensky, like the trained monkey he is, repeated this mantra. Trump did not take the bait.

    Presidents Trump and Putin spoke for about two hours on Monday (May 19). Trump used a big tube of lipstick to describe the conversation. President Trump characterized the conversation as “excellent,” announcing that Russia and Ukraine will “immediately” begin negotiations toward a ceasefire and an end to the war. He proposed the Vatican as a potential host for these talks and indicated that the US would not mediate, asserting that only the two countries understand the nuances of the conflict.

    The Kremlin provided a more accurate account. According to the Kremlin’s readout, Putin described the call as “frank and substantive,” expressing Russia’s readiness to work with Ukraine on drafting a memorandum for future peace talks. However, he declined to support the US-proposed 30-day unconditional ceasefire, emphasizing that any ceasefire would require prior agreement on various unresolved issues.

    Putin reiterated Russia’s core demands, including the demilitarization of Ukraine and limitations on Western influence, stating that these objectives remain unchanged. He suggested that a ceasefire could only be possible if numerous open questions are addressed beforehand.

    In other words, Putin did not budge one inch in the Russian position he presented on 14 June 2024. This is consistent with Russia’s presentation to the Ukrainian delegation last Friday in Istanbul. Russia’s lead negotiator, Vladimir Medinsky, asserted that negotiations could proceed concurrently with ongoing military operations. He emphasized that Russia was prepared to continue the conflict for as long as necessary to achieve its objectives, referencing historical precedents such as the Great Northern War, which lasted 21 years. Medinsky reportedly stated, “We are ready to fight forever,” highlighting Russia’s readiness for a prolonged conflict.

    Medinsky is not gaslighting. His words reflect the thinking of Putin and the Russian General Staff. The unanswered question is whether or not Trump and his national security team understand that Russia is not staking out a faux negotiation posture… i.e., presenting a tough demand, but are willing to make concessions? The answer is, NO!

    Reprinted with permission from Sonar21.

  31. Site: southern orders
    2 days 6 hours ago

     


    It may change today, but the National catholic Reporter has not yet had even a news story of Pope Leo’s shake up of the Pope John Paul II Institute for Life by jettisoning Archbishop Paglia let alone a commentary on it.  Are they in a state of shock that Pope Leo XIV will not be the second fluffiest pope everrrr?

    Oddly enough, too, as I type this, Crux has no story on it or analysis. Perhaps that will come. The Pillar printed a good commentary yesterday. 

    And truly odd is that the English version of Vatican News has nothing on Paglia either although the Italian version had it since yesterday. 

    Pope Leo XIV is NOT Pope Benedict XVII and His Holiness certainly is NOT Pope Francis II. His Holiness is His Holiness’ own man and as far as I can tell His Holiness is into the Hermeneutic of Continuity, building upon the pre-Vatican II Church and her papacy before Vatican II and reading Vatican II through every Council the Church has had and every pope too.

    PRAISE GOD FROM WHO ALL BLESSINGS FLOW.

    And on top of that, Pope Leo XIV looks like a pope and embraces an elegant look to include French Cuffs and Cuff links. How can you go wrong with that?

  32. Site: LifeNews
    2 days 7 hours ago
    Author: Grace Porto

    Catholic University of America (CUA) recognized Rep. Chris Smith, R-N.J., with an honorary degree on May 17 for his commitment to the rights of the unborn.

    Catholic University also noted that Smith has authored legislation to prevent human rights violations, such as the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000.

    In a speech at the CUA Honorees Dinner the prior evening, Smith thanked the university for the degree. He also celebrated the election and inauguration of Pope Leo XIV as the first American pope.

    “The renewed hope and well-founded expectations are remarkable,” he stated. “Apart from the Holy Spirit, who saw that coming?”

    Speaking in Father O’Connell Hall — named after the Bishop David O’Connell of Trenton, New Jersey, whom Smith called “the extraordinarily effective, wise and holy” shepherd of his own diocese — the congressman reflected on his decades of advocacy rooted in Catholic conviction and moral clarity.

    “Protection of human rights is the core motivator for my service in Congress and it begins with the right to life,” Smith said. “Stopping the violence of abortion is what led me to run for the House, with the complete support of my dear wife Marie.”

    HELP LIFENEWS SAVE BABIES FROM ABORTION! Please help LifeNews.com with a donation!

    Smith traced his political calling to his college years, where he and Marie co-founded a pro-life student group that would help pave the way for today’s Students for Life.

    “She has been a powerful, talented and incredibly wise, faith-filled pro-life leader,” he said of Marie, who was unable to attend due to illness.

    He praised her for her decades of international advocacy, including service with Holy See delegations to the United Nations and her founding of the Parliamentary Network for Critical Issues.

    Even amid global suffering, from forced abortion in China to modern-day slavery and organ trafficking, Smith’s message focused on unwavering Christian hope.

    “We are a people of indomitable hope—we absolutely refuse to entertain discouragement or defeat,” he said.

    Bishop James Su Zhihim, part of China’s Underground Church, is an example of this hope, according to Smith.

    Even after enduring decades of torture, Bishop Su still prayed for his captors, Smith noted: “An awe-inspiring example of faithfulness to Jesus’ teaching in the Gospel from Luke: ‘To you who hear I say, love your enemies, do good to those who hate you.’”

    Smith spoke of his continued work to expose and end human rights atrocities. The Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 has led to more than 2,225 convictions.

    “The TVPA created a new, well-funded whole-of-government domestic and international strategy,” he stated, “and established numerous new programs to protect victims, prosecute traffickers and to the extent possible, prevent human trafficking in the first place.”

    His latest legislation, the Stop Forced Organ Harvesting Act of 2025, targets what he called “the worldwide barbaric practice of murdering victims to steal their vital organs.”

    “Each year, tens of thousands of young victims, perhaps more — average age 28 — are slaughtered by the Chinese Communist Party for their organs,” he explained.

    Ethnic and religious minorities like Uyghurs and Falun Gong practitioners are disproportionately targeted in what he called  “a genocide for profit.”

    Smith implored Catholic University, and, in particular, the Center for Human Rights, to raise up moral leaders in a world aching for justice who will put an end to these atrocities and protect victims.

    Quoting Christ in Matthew 25:45, he offered a reminder that anchored his entire speech: “Truly I tell you, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.”

    LifeNews Note: Grace Porto writes for CatholicVote, where this column originally appeared.

    The post Catholic University Gives Amazing Pro-Life Congressman Chris Smith an Honorary Degree appeared first on LifeNews.com.

  33. Site: Ron Paul Institute - Featured Articles
    2 days 7 hours ago
    Author: Jacob G. Hornberger

    One of the ways that brutal right-wing Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet would terrorize the Chilean people into patriotic submission to his authority was by disappearing people. This was different from simply torturing and executing them. He and his goons certainly did that too. But disappearing people was different. With executions and bodies, families at least had certainty with respect to what had happened to their loved one. With disappearances, they never could be certain that their loved one really was dead. There was always a small part of people that retained some amount of hope that maybe — just maybe — their loved one would show up after being released from years or decades in some prison. It was a brutal way to psychologically torture the family members of the person who had been disappeared and everyone else in society.

    In a sense, disappearing people is what the U.S. government has been doing with immigrants that it is sending to El Salvador. Once U.S. officials deliver people into the clutches of El Salvador’s brutal dictatorial regime, the U.S. government ostensibly loses control over them. At that point, people are taken to the country’s infamous terrorism confinement center where they are subjected to torture and indefinite detention and even the possibility of extra-judicial execution.

    Equally important, the inmate is denied any contact with the outside world. His family does not know his condition. For all they know, he could be dead. He has been disappeared into the bowels of the terrorist confinement center for as long as El Salvador’s dictatorial regime wants him there.

    In an article in the Los Angeles Times, one of the 110,000 people who have been incarcerated in El Salvador is 37-year-old René Mauricio Tadeo Serrano, who was arrested in 2022 while working at a factory. His mother, Maria Serrano, says that she has not heard from him for nearly three years. According to the Times article, “On a recent morning, Serrano stood outside the prosecutor’s office begging for information on her son’s case, alongside dozens of other mothers whose children have disappeared.”

    Three years! Imagine sitting in this brutal prison and not receiving visitors, including your very own family. Imagine not knowing whether you’ll ever get out. That’s assuming, of course, that Serrano is still alive.

    It’s worth mentioning that the people who the U.S. government is disappearing into the Salvadoran system for an undefined period of time have not been convicted of any crime, either in the United States or in El Salvador.

    Unfortunately, El Salvador’s system of disappearing people is now our system too. That’s because of the partnership that the U.S. government has entered into with El Salvador’s brutal dictatorship.

    At the risk of belaboring the obvious, that was not the type of system envisioned by our American ancestors who founded our nation. In fact, it was the Allende-Bukele type of system that our ancestors fiercely opposed.

    That’s why our American ancestors demanded the enactment of the Bill of Rights immediately after the Constitution was adopted. They wanted to make it clear that the American system would never become an Allende-Bukele system. Their mindset was clearly reflected in the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments, which guaranteed that what is being done in El Salvador and what was done in Chile under Pinochet would never happen here in the United States.

    That’s how we got due process of law, trial by jury, the right to a speedy trial, right to counsel, the presumption of innocence, protection against cruel and unusual punishments, and other protections, along with the writ of habeas corpus, which has been called the linchpin of a free society.

    Many people in El Salvador love Bukele and his brutal system. Indeed, many right-wing Americans do too, just as they loved Pinochet and his brutal system. That’s because they don’t care about freedom as much as they care about being kept “safe.” Thus, like people throughout history, they are eager and willing to trade their liberty for the pretense of safety. But as one Salvadoran put it, “We used to be afraid of the gangs. Now we’re afraid of the state.” In other words, the chickens who eagerly and willingly enter into their cages to be kept safe finally start realizing that being guarded by the fox comes with problems.

    Appellate Judge Alex Kosinski once pointed out that people who surrender their guns will only make that mistake once. The reason is that once they have surrendered their guns, their regime will never permit them to get them back in order to be able to make the mistake again.

    The same argument applies to civil liberties. If Americans surrender their civil liberties for the pretense of safety or security, they will likely find that they will only make that mistake once, especially after a few hundred of them have been disappeared into the bowels of the terrorism confinement center of El Salvador or some other brutal dictatorial regime. At that point, many people will immediately go silent or, even worse, suddenly becomes ardent supporters of the system, as they did in Chile and as they have done in El Salvador.

    Reprinted with permission from Future of Freedom Foundation.

  34. Site: LifeNews
    2 days 7 hours ago
    Author: Elise DeGeeter

    Fourteen House Republicans sent a letter Monday to House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-LA, urging him to invite Pope Leo XIV to address Congress—a historic first for a US-born pontiff.

    “We as Catholics celebrate the first-ever American pope and hope you will consider an invitation to him,” the lawmakers wrote. “It would be valuable for Congress to hear His Holiness’s vision for the role of Catholic faith in the world and how he plans to lead the over 1.4 billion Catholics worldwide and the many others who look to the Holy See for spiritual and moral guidance.”

    Get the latest pro-life news and information on X (Twitter). //

    14 House Republicans, led by @millermeeks, invite Pope Leo to address Congress. https://t.co/56YDc6HfZu pic.twitter.com/1rKX5mhlJ4

    — Anthony Adragna (@AnthonyAdragna) May 19, 2025

    The request was led by Iowa Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks, a Catholic who attended Pope Leo’s inaugural Mass in Rome Sunday.

    “What an incredible honor to witness the First Mass (inaugural) of the first American Pope, Pope Leo XVI,” she wrote on social media. “A moment of faith, unity, and deep significance for Catholics across the world.”

    In their letter, the lawmakers praised the pope’s decades of service both in the US and abroad, noting that the native of the Chicago area “made history as the first-ever American pope, an unprecedented feat that makes America’s light shine even brighter across the globe.”

    “Hearing his address would be of great benefit for Congress and the American people,” they added. “In a time of increasing religious intolerance, we welcome the vision and leadership of Pope Leo XIV and respectfully request that you invite his holiness to address a joint session of Congress this calendar year.”

    Pope Francis became the first pope to address Congress in 2015. If invited, Pope Leo would be the first to do so as a native-born American.

    LifeNews Note: Elise DeGeeter writes for CatholicVote, where this column originally appeared.

    The post Members of Congress Ask House Speaker to Invite Pope Leo to Give Major Speech appeared first on LifeNews.com.

  35. Site: Zero Hedge
    2 days 7 hours ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    Ayatollah Khamenei Slams 'Outrageous' US 'Red Line' Demand Of Iran In Nuclear Talks 

    After several days of back-and-forth public criticisms and US declarations of a "red line" - Iran's Supreme Leader has finally weighed in definitively on where things stand from Tehran's perspective.

    Ayatollah Ali Khamenei called the latest US demands that Iranian enrichment be taken down to zero "excessive and outrageous," according to state media. He further expressed doubts that current nuclear talks with the Trump administration will actually lead anywhere.

    "I don't think nuclear talks with the U.S. will bring results. I don't know what will happen," Khamenei said. He further called on Washington to cease making over-the-top demands in nuclear talks. Tehran officials have of late also called the Trump administration's stance "contradictory" - after President Trump attempted overtures, sprinkled with direct threats, in his Iran-related rhetoric while in the Gulf last week.

    "The American side in these indirect talks should avoid nonsensical remarks," the country's top religious cleric and highest authority continued. "Saying they will not allow Iran to enrich is a big mistake. No-one waits for their permission."

    The Ayatollah made the remarks while speaking at a memorial honoring late President Ebrahim Raisi, who one year ago died when his helicopter crashed in northern mountains:

    He praised Raisi, a fellow hardline cleric, for refusing direct talks with the US while in office.

    "He clearly said 'no' without ambiguity," Khamanei noted, adding that Raisi did not let enemies "drag Iran to the negotiating table through threats or tricks".

    Khamenei said nuclear talks under Raisi's predecessor, the moderate cleric Hassan Rouhani, had failed to achieve results, and that he did not think there would be any breakthrough under his successor, Masoud Pezeshkian, who is a reformist.

    President Trump had last week said the Iranians "sort of" agreed to the terms of a deal following four rounds of talks mediated by Oman, going back to mid-April.

    Also last week, a top Iranian nuclear official said it was possible that Iran could given up enrichment in exchange for sanctions relief. But this was clearly premature, and the Ayatollah is now seeking to clarify the Islamic Republic's stance.

    Americans have been told for 20 years: Iran is just a few months away from a nuclear weapon! The world has heard continuously: we have only months to bomb Iran to prevent it!

    I cited a sample during my debate in NYC with Alan Dershowitz last year on whether the US should bomb: pic.twitter.com/xJpR9uqMWP

    — Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) May 12, 2025

    Trump envpy Steve Witkoff on the Sunday news shows made clear that the issue of abandoning enrichment is a "red line" from the US administration. He described to ABC the "red line" for Iran is no enrichment, not even one percent. And yet the past couple decades have seen Iran time and again view this as a non-starter.

    "Everything begins… with a deal that does not include enrichment… because enrichment enables weaponization, and we will not allow a bomb to get here," he added.

    Tyler Durden Tue, 05/20/2025 - 08:45
  36. Site: LifeNews
    2 days 7 hours ago
    Author: Mat Staver

    Two major battle fronts are happening right now in the fight to defund Planned Parenthood and Big Abortion.

    In the Courts, Planned Parenthood is suing to force pro-life states to continue to pay for abortions. Liberty Counsel is on the case.

    After witnessing the horrors our client Sandra Merritt revealed in her undercover videos which exposed Planned Parenthood’s evil baby parts for sale scheme, South Carolina banned Medicaid funding for Planned Parenthood.

    Sandra’s videos showed Planned Parenthood doctors and officials bragging about violating numerous laws and giddily discussing butchering babies (some alive) to garner higher human organ trafficking prices. Their brutal activities were enough to compel South Carolina to ban Medicaid taxpayer dollars from going to Planned Parenthood.

    Get the latest pro-life news and information on X (Twitter). //

    Despite being caught red handed, Planned Parenthood is now SUING South Carolina to force the pro-life state to continue funding the abortion giant’s baby butchery.

    The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic in April, and the High Court is now preparing the written opinion. Our brief exposes the horror inside these abortion clinics.

    Meanwhile, we are working with Congress to defund Planned Parenthood and Big Abortion at the federal level as well. Demand Congress defund Planned Parenthood once and for all!

    Liberty Counsel staff have been working with top members of Congress to stop giving Planned Parenthood ANY taxpayer dollars.

    • Abortion at a Planned Parenthood clinic is the third largest cause of death in the United States.
    • Planned Parenthood kills 1,102 babies every day in America. That’s 1 child every 78 seconds.
    • Planned Parenthood performs 228 abortions for every one adoption referral it recommends.
    • During 2023 to 2024 alone, U.S. taxpayers gave Planned Parenthood nearly 800 million dollars — more than 40% of the abortion giant’s total income.
    • According to Planned Parenthood’s own report, abortion makes up 97.1% of its business.

    It’s time to stop paying for Planned Parenthood’s killing machine.

    The good news is last week the budget bill passed the first hurdle in the U.S. House committee retaining the language to defund Planned Parenthood and Big Abortion. Now we need to pass the bill in the House and in the U.S. Senate. Members of Congress need to hear from you. This will be a huge battle, but we can win if we work together.

    Please, join me now in demanding Congress defund Planned Parenthood!

    LifeNews Note: Mat Staver is the Chairman of Liberty Counsel Action and Founder and Chairman of Liberty Counsel. 

    The post Two Major Battles are Happening Right Now to Defund Planned Parenthood appeared first on LifeNews.com.

  37. Site: OnePeterFive
    2 days 7 hours ago
    Author: T. S. Flanders

    Everyone was wondering if the next Pope would take the name Francis II. Now that this has not happened, we are all wondering how Pope Leo will deal with the legacy of his controversial predecessor. Yesterday Pope Leo made an address “to representatives of other churches and ecclesial communities and other religions” who had attended his inuguration Mass on Sunday. (The term “churches” is used for…

    Source

  38. Site: Zero Hedge
    2 days 7 hours ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    Futures Slide After Monday's Historic Retail-Driven Rebound

    US equity futures are weaker with Tech underperforming, threatening a six-day winning streak that propelled the S&P 500 to the brink of a bull market. Then again, Monday started off even worse and then we saw the biggest burst of retail buying on record resulting in one of the biggest intraday reversals in recent history (according to JPM, more here), so brace for more unexpected moves. As of 8:00am ET, S&P futures are down 0.2%, while Nasdaq 100 futs drop 0.3% with Mag7 stocks mixed amid weakness in semis into today’s Google I/O developer conference; healthcare is leading Defensives over Cyclicals. The yield curve is twisting steeper with the 10Y yield flat and USD weakening. Commodities are mixed with crude down, natgas up, base metals down, precious up, and Ags generally higher. Macro data is light, with just the Philly non-mfg PMI on deck ahead of Thursday’s Flash PMIs & Claims prints, but we have another round of Fed speakers where the message continues to be patience.

    In premarket trading,  Mag 7 stocks were mixed (Tesla +1.4%, Alphabet +0.5%, Nvidia -0.2%, Microsoft -0.1%, Apple -0.3%, Amazon -0.2%, Meta Platforms -0.3%). Home Depot gained 2.2% after maintaining its guidance for the fiscal year as US sales ticked up, a sign that consumer spending has held up despite economic turbulence. Vipshop’s US-listed shares (VIPS) decline 8% after the China-based online marketplace reported its first-quarter results and gave an outlook. here are some other notable premarket movers:

    • Air Lease (AL) rises 1.2% as Citi upgrades to buy, saying a possible capital allocation creates a “tactical opportunity.”
    • ASP Isotopes (ASPI) jumps 15% after signing financing and supply agreements with TerraPower to support the construction of a new uranium enrichment facility.
    • ImmunityBio (IBRX) rises 4% after Piper Sandler upgraded the drug developer to overweight, saying the launch of the firm’s newly approved bladder cancer drug Anktiva is off to a strong start.
    • Pegasystems Inc. (PEGA) rises 6% as the customer relationship management software company will join the S&P Midcap 400 Index before trading opens May 22.
    • Pony AI ADRs (PONY) jump 5% after the Chinese autonomous-driving company reported revenue for the first quarter of $14 million vs $12.5 million year-over-year.
    • Trip.com (TCOM) US-listed shares fall 4% after the online travel agency reported its first-quarter results.
    • Yalla (YALA) falls 8% after the social-network operator saw a drop in the number of paying users on its platform.

    Ironically, as everyone was expecting a Monday metldown in US treasuries - and got just the opposite - the big move was in Japan, where bonds cratered and long-end yields soared to a record high after a near-failed government bond auction saw the weakest bid-to-cover demand since 2012 and the biggest tail since 1987, pointing screaming to increasing concerns about investor support as the Bank of Japan dials back its huge debt holdings.

    As markets continue to meltup, investors are looking for clarity on market direction, with strategists in a Bloomberg poll now far more optimistic about European stocks than the US market. Jamie Dimon, meanwhile, has been warning about risks from inflation and credit spreads to geopolitics. “The market came down 10%, it’s back up 10%; I think that’s an extraordinary amount of complacency.”

    Meanwhile, the threat of US tariffs showed up in Chinese shipments of smartphones, which fell 72% in April, according to China’s customs data.

    Tech has been the main driver of the recent market bounce and will remain in focus into next week’s key earnings release from Nvidia. Google is holding its I/O developer conference, with the keynote speech at 4:30 pm ET. Broader deployment of AI mode on Google search will be a big focus, Bloomberg Intelligence said. 

    A slate of Fed speakers will be closely watched today for clues on the outlook for the US economy and any commentary on the Moody’s downgrade. Two Fed officials suggested on Monday that policymakers may not be ready to lower rates before September as they confront a murky economic outlook. 

    In Europe, the Stoxx 600 climbs 0.4%, on pace for a fourth session of gains, led by utilities, telecoms and health care. Germany’s DAX topped 24,000 for the first time. Among individual stocks, Orange advances after Bloomberg reported that Patrick Drahi is weighing a SFR sale. Wall Street strategists are betting European stocks will enjoy their best performance relative to the US in at least two decades as the region’s economic outlook improves. While US stocks have rallied in recent weeks, two Federal Officials warned on Monday that they would adopt a wait-and-see approach before lowering interest rates. Here are the most notable European movers:

    • Orange shares rise as much as 3.1% after Bloomberg reported that billionaire Patrick Drahi’s Altice France is considering the sale of a controlling stake in SFR, raising hopes of further industry consolidations in a competitive market.
    • Smiths Group gains as much as 4.4%, to highest since Jan. 31, after the UK engineering firm says full-year organic revenue growth is expected to be toward the top end of its guided range.
    • SoftwareOne shares gain as much as 4.5% after Kepler Cheuvreux raised the recommendation on the stock to buy from hold saying cost-cutting is gaining traction and 1Q should show early margin recovery.
    • Greggs shares rise as much as 8.8% to a three-month high after the UK food-on-the-go retailer gave a trading update in which it said it is seeing an improved performance, and kept its expectations for the year unchanged.
    • Diploma shares surge as much as 18%, hitting a record high, as analysts hail the building components supplier’s positive first-half performance, mainly driven by its Controls unit.
    • SSP shares rise as much as 5.3%, to the highest in three months, after the operator of food and beverage outlets at travel locations reiterated its full-year outlook, in spite of softer current trading in North America amid weaker travel demand.
    • Schaeffler shares rise as much as 7.6% after the German auto parts firm was double-upgraded to buy at Bank of America, which sees the firm’s adjusted Ebit doubling by 2028.
    • Orsted shares rose as much as 15% the Trump administration lifted an order that halted construction on Equinor’s $5 billion project off the coast of New York.
    • Fincantieri shares rise as much as 9.7% a record high, after it unveiled targets for a newly created Underwater Armament Systems unit.
    • UBS shares declined as much as 3.5%, the most since April 9, after Bloomberg News reported the lender is likely to face defeat in its effort to water down the Swiss government’s law that could force it to maintain up to $25 billion in extra capital.
    • Salmar falls as much as 5.6%, the most in almost a month, after the Norwegian seafood and salmon company reported its latest earnings, which DNB Carnegie describes as a “big miss.”
    • Kingfisher falls as much as 4.8% as Barclays cuts its recommendation on the UK construction and DIY supplier to underweight from equalweight. A 25% rally this year is “overly generous,” the bank says.

    Asian stocks gained for the first time in four sessions, with Hong Kong-listed shares leading the advance thanks to a slew of positive corporate developments. The MSCI Asia Pacific Index rose as much as 0.6%, the most in nearly a week, with Alibaba and Sony among key gainers. Xiaomi shares jumped after the CEO said the company is starting mass production of a new chip, while Chinese healthcare stocks surged after biotech company 3SBio entered into a pact with Pfizer. Shares in India slipped.  Momentum is returning to Asian stocks with tensions easing on the trade front while global growth seems intact. Chinese battery giant CATL gained in its debut in Hong Kong after wrapping up the world’s largest initial public offering this year, showing the appetite for such themes in the region.

    The RBA delivered a 25bp cut at their May meeting, as widely expected, but with clear dovish elements to the meeting as a whole. The statement was materially more positive on the progress made on the inflation mandate, with inflation expected to remain around the RBA’s 2-3% target band, and with a removal of the previous language on being determined to “sustainably return inflation to target”. The updated macro projections were also materially softer, in-line with our economists’ expectations, with lower profiles for growth and inflation, and a higher path for the unemployment rate. Perhaps the most notable dovish news though was Governor Bullock noting that the Board discussed a 50bp cut at today’s meeting, suggesting a clearer break from their previously more cautious thinking. Goldman economists revised their RBA call to include an additional cut at the November meeting, in addition to the cuts they continue to expect at the July and August meetings.

    In Fx, the Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index slips 0.1%. The Aussie lags G-10 peers, down 0.6% versus the greenback after RBA Governor Michele Bullock said the board considered a 50bps rate cut before opting for 25.  The Dollar continues to underperform, but within tight ranges this morning. EUR (+10bps) price action remains constructive after the trading desk’s flow bias being skewed towards selling yesterday. Our Spot Traders (KBS) note that there was a lack of interest from HFs to chase yesterday - partly an element of some still tending to prior wounds but we seem to have hit the limit of false starts without a clear identifiable catalyst that HFs are willing to chase. USDJPY is trading -25bps lower after a choppy price action overnight. Despite continued spot moves lower in USDJPY and increased speculation that there may be some kind of “currency deal” as part of trade negotiations, our traders noted that downside USDJPY gamma has repriced lower (1m ATM -0.25v vs the roll) with the market struggling to digest front end vol supply the last 48hrs. USDCNH is trading +10bps higher after jumping on headlines that cut benchmark lending rates for the first time since October. The outlier overnight was AUD (-70bps), amid the dovish 25bps cut from the RBA.

    In rates, treasuries are mixed as US session gets under way with the yield curve steeper. Front-end yields are 1bp-2bp lower on the day while 30-year is higher by around 3bp near 4.93%. Treasury curve pivots around little-changed 7-year sector, with 10-year near 4.46%, trailing bunds and gilts in the sector by 1.8bp and 2.5bp. Bunds and gilts outperform following softer-than-expected German PPI data and pricing of a £4 billion 2056 syndicated gilt issue. Gilts lead a rally in European bonds, with UK 10-year yields down 3bps to 4.63%. Traders shrugged off BOE Chief Economist Huw Pill’s warning that interest rates may be coming down too quickly. US economic data calendar includes only a regional indicator, however several Fed speakers are slated. Treasury auctions ahead this week include $16 billion 20-year new issue Wednesday and $18 billion 10-year TIPS reopening Thursday

    In commodities, Oil pares earlier gains seen after Iran’s Supreme Leader Khamenei voiced skepticism over talks with the US. WTI drops 0.2% to near $62.50.  Spot gold rises $8 to around $3,238/oz.

    The US economic data calendar includes May Philadelphia Fed non-manufacturing activity (8:30am). Fed speaker slate includes Bostic, Barkin (9am), Collins (9:30am), Musalem (1pm), Kugler (5pm), Hammack and Daly (7pm)

    Market Snapshot

    • S&P 500 mini -0.2%,
    • Nasdaq 100 mini -0.3%, 
    • Russell 2000 mini -0.3%
    • Stoxx Europe 600 +0.4%, 
    • DAX +0.2%, 
    • CAC 40 little changed
    • 10-year Treasury yield little changed at 4.45%
    • VIX +0.3 points at 18.44
    • Bloomberg Dollar Index -0.1% at 1223.55, 
    • euro +0.2% at $1.1262
    • WTI crude -0.1% at $62.6/barrel

    Top Overnight News

    • Freedom caucus chair Harris said the votes are not there for the Trump bill and predicts a deal on the tax bill will be delayed until June.
    • Trump has claimed that Russia and Ukraine  will “immediately” begin negotiations on preparations for peace talks, but signaled that he was leaving Moscow and Kyiv to find a deal without the US as a broker. FT
    • Crypto scored a big win after a group of Democrats dropped their opposition to stablecoin legislation. The bill may pass this week. BBG
    • Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said negotiations with the US over his country’s nuclear program are unlikely to result in a deal and called the Trump administration’s latest demands on Iran “outrageous.”
    • China cut benchmark lending rates for the first time since October on Tuesday, while major state banks lowered deposit rates as authorities work to ease monetary policy to help buffer the economy from the impact of the Sino-U.S. trade war. RTRS
    • China’s smartphone exports to the US fell 72% last month, outpacing an overall 21% drop in shipments. At the same time, the value of phone component exports to India roughly quadrupled. BBG
    • The Bank of Japan will sound out market participants this week to gauge their views on how aggressively it should proceed with quantitative tightening as yields surge nearly a year after it began scaling back its huge bond purchases. BBG
    • Japan's top trade negotiator, Ryosei Akazawa, said on Tuesday there was no change to Tokyo's stance of demanding an elimination of U.S. tariffs in bilateral trade negotiations.
    • Tokyo will not rush into clinching a trade deal if doing so risked hurting the country's interests, he said. RTRS
    • India is discussing a US trade deal structured in three tranches and expects to reach an interim agreement before July, when President Donald Trump’s reciprocal tariffs are set to kick in, according to officials in New Delhi familiar with the matter. BBG
    • Donald Trump plans to go to the Capitol today to push House Republicans to back his tax-cut bill. Speaker Mike Johnson’s meeting with holdout GOP members from high-tax states failed to produce a deal on SALT. BBG

    Tariffs/Trade

    • Japan is reportedly mulls accepting US tariff reduction, not exemption, according to Kyodo. The Japanese government is reportedly considering the option of accepting a reduction in the rate of additional tariffs and reciprocal tariffs on automobiles and other items. Due to the US, according to sources, refusing to eliminate tariffs in prior negotiations and is said to have "indicated its intention to exclude additional tariffs on automobiles, steel, and aluminium, which are important to Japan, from the talks".
    • US Treasury Secretary Bessent will travel to Canada to participate in the G7 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors meeting, while he will focus on the need to address global economic imbalances and non-market practices.
    • Japanese Economy Minister Akazawa said Japan and the US conducted working-level talks on bilateral trade on Monday, while he added there was no change to Japan's stance of demanding the elimination of US tariffs. It was also reported that the US and Japan could hold talks as soon as this Friday although US Treasury Secretary Bessent is not expected to attend, according to Kyodo.
    • Taiwan's President Lai said tariff talks with the US are going smoothly, while he added that Taiwan is to initiate a national wealth fund and is to broaden economic connections with nations other than the US.
    • India is discussing a US trade deal structured in three tranches and expects to reach an interim agreement before July.

    A more detailed look at global markets courtesy of Newsquawk

    APAC stocks were marginally higher as the region took impetus from the rebound stateside where the major indices gradually recouped the losses triggered by the US rating downgrade, and both the S&P 500 and the Dow notched six-day win streaks. ASX 200 was led by outperformance in tech and financials, while the attention was on the RBA which delivered a  widely expected rate cut. Nikkei 225 rallied at the open in tandem with a surge in USD/JPY but then gave back the majority of the spoils amid currency fluctuations and with little in the way of fresh catalysts for Japan. Hang Seng and Shanghai Comp were kept afloat after China's largest banks cut deposit rates and slashed the benchmark Loan Prime Rates by 10bps as guided by PBoC Governor Pan, while sentiment was also underpinned by a jump in CATL shares on its Hong Kong debut.

    Top Asian News

    • China's state planner said they will make greater efforts to attract and utilise foreign capital, while China is drafting loan management rules for renewal projects and most policies will be implemented before end of June.
    • BoJ releases briefing material used at a meeting with bond market participants: notes some members said JGB market functionality is improving as a trend due to the BoJ taper. Some look for an eventual end to bond buying, some are after bigger cuts in the next plan. Some seek substantial cuts in one go. Deteriorating demand-supply for super-long JGBs is not something the BoJ can fix.

    RBA

    • RBA cut the Cash Rate by 25bps to 3.85%, as expected, while it stated that inflation continues to moderate and that the outlook remains uncertain. RBA affirmed that maintaining low and stable inflation is the priority and the board judged that the risks to inflation have become more balanced, as well as assessed that this move on rates will make monetary policy somewhat less restrictive. Furthermore, the RBA stated that headline inflation is likely to rise over the coming year to around the top of the band as temporary factors unwind and the remains cautious about the outlook, particularly given the heightened level of uncertainty about both aggregate demand and supply. RBA also released its Quarterly Statement on Monetary Policy which noted that the escalation of global trade conflict a key downside risk to economy and that the global growth outlook was downgraded, while it added that uncertainty has increased due to US tariff policies and it trimmed its core domestic inflation forecasts.
    • Governor Bullock: prepared to take further rate actions if required; price increases have slowed; Bullock adds this was a confident cut in rates; There was a discussion between a 50bps cut or a 25bps cut; discussed holding rates or cutting. Cannot say where the cash rate will end up, does not endorse market pricing (Note: ~55bps of cuts currently seen by year-end).

    European bourses (STOXX 600 +0.3%) opened modestly firmer across the board and have traded within a tight range thus far, given the lack of pertinent updates. European sectors are mixed, and aside from the top performer, the breadth of the market is fairly narrow. Utilities takes the top spot, with sentiment in wind names boosted after the Trump administration lifted a stop-work on Equinor’s (+1.3%) New York offshore wind farm project; the name is higher by around 1.5% - peers such as Orsted (+14%) have also been edging higher.

    Top European News

    • BoE's Pill says "dissenting vote stems from a concern that the pace of withdrawal of monetary policy restriction since last summer – quarterly cuts of 25bp – is too rapid given the balance of risks to price stability". Dissent was in line with his preference for “cautious and gradual” cuts in Bank Rate expressed over the past twelve months. Would characterise his dissenting vote as favouring a ‘skip’ in the quarterly pattern of Bank Rate cuts. It should not be seen as favouring a halt to (still less a reversal of) that withdrawal of restriction. Is concerned that structural changes in the price and wage setting behaviour have increased the intrinsic persistence of the UK inflation process. The underlying disinflation continues. The prospective path of Bank Rate from here is downward. Dissent from the most recent decision does not reflect a fundamental difference with the MPC. Says "we should not be dependent on how the data turns out". Can't assume that the inflation "pain" of new economic shocks will dissipate quickly. Agrees with the MPC that there is an easing in the labour markets, has questions over the pace. Some key pay indicators "remain quite strong".
    • ECB's Schnabel says disinflation is on track, though new shocks could pose new challenges. Tariffs could be disinflationary in the short run but result in upside risk over the medium term. "We are facing a historical opportunity to foster the international role of the euro" & "When the inflation regime changes, we must be ready to respond swiftly".
    • German VCI Chemical Industry Association: Q1 Production +0.6% Y/Y; Revenue +1.8% Y/Y; notes that production is expected to stagnate this year and industry sales will decrease slightly.

    FX

    • After a contained start, DXY has extended on Monday's downside which was largely attributed to the Moody's downgrade on the US on Friday. Newsflow on the trade front has been non-incremental aside from a Reuters sources piece noting that the US Treasury does not anticipate any trade deal announcements at the G7 Finance Meeting in Canada this week.
    • PBoC set USD/CNY mid-point at 7.1931 vs exp. 7.2112 (Prev. 7.1916). Today's speaker slate includes Fed's Bostic, Barkin, Collins, Musalem, Kugler, Daly & Hammack. DXY is just about holding above the 100 mark.
    • EUR fractionally firmer vs. the USD with not a great deal in terms of Eurozone newsflow aside from ongoing ECB speak with Executive Board member Schnabel noting that disinflation is on track, though new shocks could pose new challenges. EUR/USD sits towards the top end of Monday's 1.1169-1.1288 range.
    • JPY at the top of the G10 leaderboard with some of the move attributed to moves in Japanese yields with the 30yr JGB yield hitting its highest level since its debut since 1999 following a soft JGB auction overnight. On the trade front, Japanese Economy Minister Akazawa said Japan and the US conducted working-level talks on bilateral trade on Monday. Note, Japanese Finance Minister Kato and US Treasury Secretary Bessent are expected to discuss exchange rates on the sidelines of the G7 meeting in Canada this week. USD/JPY has delved as low as 144.10 but stopped shy of the 144 mark.
    • GBP is a touch firmer vs. the USD and steady vs. the EUR. This morning has seen remarks from BoE Chief Economist Pill, who dissented at the 8th May rate decision by voting for an unchanged rate vs. consensus for a 25bps cut. Pill noted that his dissenting vote stemmed from a concern that the pace of withdrawal of monetary policy restriction since last summer is too rapid, given the balance of risks to price stability. He added that his vote should be seen as a skip and not a halt to the withdrawal of the restriction process. The remarks had little follow-through to GBP; currently around 1.3370.
    • Antipodeans are both softer vs. the USD with AUD lagging across the majors post-RBA. As expected, the RBA pulled the trigger on a 25bps cut whilst offering a cautious view on the outlook and lowering its inflation forecasts in its accompanying Statement on Monetary Policy. At the follow-up press conference, AUD/USD hit a session low at 0.6409 after Governor Bullock revealed that the board discussed cutting by 25bps or 50bps.

    Fixed Income

    • JGBs were initially firmer, in-fitting with peers after Monday’s eventual intraday recovery from Moody’s-driven pressure. However, upside in Japan was limited into supply. But a poor 20yr outing caused JGBs to slip from 134.40 to a 138.78 base - pressure which has since pared.
    • USTs experienced a slight bearish blip on the above auction. However, Monday’s intraday recovery remained intact for USTs overnight and the benchmark has since extended to a 110-14+ high, eyeing 110-21+ from last week as the next point of resistance. Today's speaker slate includes Fed's Bostic, Barkin, Collins, Musalem, Kugler, Daly & Hammack.
    • Bunds a little firmer today, in-fitting with peers. Early doors remarks from Schnabel this morning, though nothing that has fundamentally changed the narrative. Numerous speakers ahead incl. Cipollone, Knot & Nagel. Similarly, no move to German Producer Prices printing lower than expectations and the prior, driven primarily by energy prices for both Y/Y & M/M components. Continues to rebound from Monday’s pressure, at best has been 15 ticks above that session’s 130.60 peak. German 10yr and 30yr auctions were well received but had little impact on German paper.
    • Gilts are firmer and currently outperforming. Outperformance which comes as Gilts didn’t get as much time to benefit from Monday’s late-door rebound and as the UK benchmark was that session’s underperformer, given EU-UK updates. As it stands, at the upper-end of a 91.45-91.91 band. BoE’s Pill outlined that his vote in May to leave rates unchanged was a “skip”. In fitting with his preference for “cautious and gradual” cuts and stemmed from a view that the recent quarterly pace “is too rapid given the balance of risks to price stability”. No move in Gilts to his speech.
    • Hong Kong pension fund managers are reportedly sounding the alarm of potential forced selling of US Treasury holdings following Moody's downgrading US' rating, according to Bloomberg sources Hong Kong Investment Fund Association (HKFIA) has recommended that an exception to the maximum 10% holding rule is made for US Treasuries, to allow funds to invest above the limit even if the US is rated one notch below AAA, according to the sources. Japan's R&I still has an AAA rating (outlook stable) on the US, and is not considering a downgrade currently "don't believe the situation described there has significantly changed"
    • UK price guidance for new 5.375% 2056 Gilt in sale via syndication seen +1.75bps to +2.25bps over 4.25% 2055 Gilt, orders over GBP 70bln.

    Commodities

    • Crude is lower this morning despite a softer dollar but amid a cautious risk tone in Europe and following some of the more sanguine tones from US President Trump regarding Russia, whilst upside was seen on less conciliatory commentary from the Iranian Supreme Leader. He said that he "does not think nuclear talks with the US will be successful", via Mehr news. Brent Jul'25 rose from USD 65.07/bbl to USD 66.00/bbl over three minutes - a move which has since mostly faded.
    • Relatively flat and lacklustre trade across precious metals amid a lack of pertinent macro drivers this morning, and following a relatively contained session on Monday. Spot gold resides in a current USD 3.204.67-3.232.85/oz range.
    • Mixed trade across base metals and in narrow ranges amid a lack of pertinent catalysts during the European session, whilst the broader risk tone remains cautious. 3M LME copper currently resides in a USD 9,443.05-9,520.90/t.

    Geopolitics: Middle East

    • Iranian Supreme Leader Khamenei says "I don't think nuclear talks with the US will be successful"; via Mehr news. Says to the US that they must remain from making outrageous demands. Saying that Iran will not be allowed to enrich uranium is excessive and outrageous.
    • "Israel Broadcasting Corporation: Netanyahu extends the stay of the Israeli negotiating team in Doha for an additional day", according to Alhadath.
    • Israeli PM Netanyahu says "Gaza war could end "tomorrow" if hostages return and Hamas leaders lay down their arms", via Sky News Arabia.
    • Iran has received a proposal for the next round of indirect negotiations with the US, according to Iran International.
    • "Iranian Foreign Ministry Spokesman: The time and place of the next round of nuclear negotiations with the United States have not yet been decided", according to Sky News Arabia

    Geopolitics: Russia-Ukraine

    • US President Trump said the US isn't stepping back from Russia-Ukraine negotiations and that it would be helpful to host Ukraine-Russia talks at the Vatican, while he repeated it is not his war and thinks something is going to happen with Russia and believes Putin wants to stop. Furthermore, Trump said he has a red line in his head on when he will stop pushing on Russia-Ukraine but won't say what that red line is and noted there could be a time when Russia sanctions will happen.
    • Kremlin spokesman said US President Trump and Russian President Putin talked about a direct conversation between Putin and Ukrainian President Zelensky although there is no decision yet on the place for the next direct contact between Russia and Ukraine. The spokesman stated there cannot be a deadline for preparing a memorandum between Russia and Ukraine, as well as noted that everyone is interested in a speedy settlement in Ukraine and that Russia is interested in eliminating the root causes of the conflict.

    US Event Calendar

    • Philadelphia Fed Non-Mfg activity survey

    Central Bank Speakers

    • 9:00 am: Fed’s Bostic Gives Opening Remarks
    • 9:00 am: Fed’s Barkin Gives Speech at Richmond Fed Conference
    • 9:30 am: Fed’s Collins Hosts Fed Listens Event in New Hampshire
    • 1:00 pm: Fed’s Musalem Speaks on Economy, Policy
    • 5:00 pm: Fed’s Kugler Gives Commencement Address

    DB's Jim Reid concludes the overnight wrap

    Yesterday felt like we were somewhere along the line of a "death by a thousand cuts" with regards to the US fiscal situation. Hard to know where in that thousand we are but probably much nearer a thousand than at zero even as yesterday saw an initial sell off reverse as the session went on. At the end of the day the loss of the final US triple-A rating late on Friday night doesn't change anything much immediately but it keeps the drip, drip, drip of poor fiscal news building up against the debt sustainability dam in the background. Anyway, that's enough of the metaphors.

    In yesterday's CoTD (link here) I highlighted that Moody's base case is now for US deficits to hit nearly 9% by 2035 and asked in a flash poll whether this would happen, or how it would be avoided or dealt with if it did. I'll keep the poll open for a couple of hours before publishing the results in my CoTD this London lunchtime. See it here. It should only take less than 5 seconds and all views very welcome.

    We saw a large round trip in Treasuries around the news, with the 30yr yield briefly reaching its highest intraday level since 2023, at 5.035%, before paring back that move to close at 4.90%, -4.1bps lower on the day and virtually in line with where we were immediately before the news late on Friday. That recovery started shortly after the US open and continued as the session went on. It perhaps indicates the slow moving trend of overseas investors selling Treasuries but domestic investors increasing their holdings.

    Earlier on, the cross-asset moves had seen a minor rerun of what happened after Liberation Day as US assets lost ground across the board. The S&P 500 recovered from -1.05% at the lows to end +0.09% higher. The US asset that struggled the most was the dollar, with the index (-0.72%) seeing only a modest recovery from its -1.02% intra-day low. That dollar decline repeated the early April parallels of capital flight scenarios often seen in emerging markets, where the currency struggles even though rates are going up.

    This is coming at a delicate time, because the US administration are seeking to pass an extension to the 2017 Trump tax cuts, which are currently due to expire at the end of 2025. My CoTD showed that the CBO believe that the US federal debt held by the public will surge to 220% by 2055 if the tax cuts are extended, with the deficit reaching 12% of GDP. Again feel free to vote in the CoTD flash poll if you want to express a view as to whether something happens way before we get to these type of levels or whether we will take it in our strides like every other debt / deficit landmark in recent years.

    In terms of that bond move in more detail, the selloff was initially very aggressive, with the 30yr yield reaching 5.035% and on track for its highest close since 2023 and actually higher for only six business days since 2007. However, that was then pared back, and it actually ended the day -4.1bps lower at 4.90%. Similarly, the 10yr yield hit an intraday high of 4.56%, but eventually closed -3.0bps lower at 4.45%. So the initial fears of the day ultimately didn’t materialise as US buyers stepped in, and at the front end, the 2yr yield fell -2.4bps to 3.98%. Overnight, yields are moving less than a basis point across the curve.

    Similarly to the rates move, the S&P 500 rallied from more than -1% down at the open to +0.09% by the close, marking its sixth consecutive gain. Defensive sectors including healthcare (+0.96%) and consumer staples (+0.42%) posted the strongest advances. By contrast, tech stocks didn't fully recover, with the Magnificent 7 down -0.25% after its best weekly performance in over two years. The small cap Russell 2000 (-0.42%) also lost ground. And reflecting the pick up in volatility, the VIX index rose (+0.90pts) rose from Friday’s seven-week low to 18.14pts.

    Whilst the US fiscal news dominated attention, in the geopolitical space we had President Trump holding a call with President Putin, but this delivered little new on resolving the war in Ukraine. Trump posted following the call that Ukraine and Russia would “immediately start negotiations”. However, Trump’s comments did not repeat earlier threats of new sanctions against Russia or put immediate pressure on Moscow to deliver a ceasefire and his post suggested that the US might now take more of a backseat in the talks. Meanwhile, Putin was rather vague on the upcoming talks, again referring to the “need to eliminate the root causes of this crisis.”

    Otherwise yesterday, several Fed officials signalled they weren’t in a hurry to cut rates. For instance, Vice Chair Jefferson said “I believe that it is appropriate that we wait and see how the policies evolve over time and their impact”. Similarly, Atlanta Fed President Bostic said “I think we’ll have to wait three to six months to start to see where this settles out” and reiterated his expectation of only one more rate cut this year. Meanwhile, New York Fed President Williams said “It’s not going to be that in June we’re going to understand what’s happening here, or in July”. And Minneapolis Fed President Kashkari noted “It’s really just wait and see until we get more information.” So it was little surprise that investors continue to see a near-term rate cut as unlikely, with only a 35% chance of a cut priced by the July meeting.

    Earlier in Europe, markets had put in a much steadier performance, with the STOXX 600 (+0.13%) just about posting a small gain. That was echoed on the rates side too, where yields on 10yr bunds (-0.2bps), OATs (-0.4bps) and BTPs (+0.1bps) all saw little change. In the meantime, the UK and the EU also reached an agreement that deepened ties between the two after Brexit. Among others, the UK agreed an extension of EU fishing rights, in return for the removal of most border checks on farm exports. That came alongside a defence and security agreement, along with a potential youth mobility scheme, although the latter will be subject to further discussion. Our UK economists looked at the deal yesterday (link here), and their estimates show the long-run benefits to be around 0.5% of GDP by 2040.

    For those of us in the UK fed up by not being able to use e-gates in the EU the deal only refers to the "potential use of eGates where appropriate". I've been in so many long queues in the last couple of years when eGates have been empty.
    In Asia risk sentiment has been helped after China’s central bank announced cuts to key lending rates for the first time since October reinforcing expectations of looser monetary policy to support the country’s economy (more below). Across the region, the Hang Seng (+1.29%) is leading gains while the CSI (+0.62%) and the Shanghai Composite (+0.38%) are also edging higher. Elsewhere, the Nikkei (+0.26%), the S&P/ASX 200 (+0.54%) are gaining but with the KOSPI (+0.05%) slipping back towards flat. S&P 500 (-0.29%) and NASDAQ 100 (-0.43%) futures are giving back some of yesterday's recovery from the lows.

    Coming back to China, the PBOC cut the 1-year loan prime rate (LPR), the reference rate for pricing all new loans and outstanding floating rate loans, to 3.0% from 3.1% and the 5-year LPR to 3.5% from 3.6%. Meanwhile the RBA have just cut rates 25bps (as expected) as I finish this off with the presser ongoing. So far it leans dovishly.

    To the day ahead now, and data releases include Canada’s CPI and German PPI for April, along with the European Commission’s preliminary consumer confidence indicator for May for the Euro Area. From central banks, we’ll hear from the Fed’s Bostic, Barkin, Collins, Musalem, Kugler, Hammack and Daly, the ECB’s Wunsch, Knot and Cipollone, and the BoE’s Pill. Finally, earnings releases include Home Depot.

    Tyler Durden Tue, 05/20/2025 - 08:36
  39. Site: La Salette Journey
    2 days 7 hours ago

    Here's a difficult question: Which of these two groups is celebrated for the entire month of June and which is largely forgotten except for about 30 seconds while people grill a hamburger or a hot dog?


    "The nation which forgets its defenders will be itself forgotten." - Calvin Coolidge 


    "Those who have long enjoyed such privileges as we enjoy forget in time that men have died to win them." —Franklin D. Roosevelt




    Duty, Honor, Country. The first as his guide,  the second he applied, for the third he died.

    Related reading here
  40. Site: AsiaNews.it
    2 days 7 hours ago
    The Tenaganita, an advocacy association, has criticised the Malaysian government for its decision to restart recruiting migrants from Bangladesh after thousands of foreign workers already present in the country were left without work, housing and legal protection, trapped in a corrupt system of exploitation, this according to the NGO's director, Glorene A Das.
  41. Site: Zero Hedge
    2 days 8 hours ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    US Senate Moves Forward With GENIUS Stablecoin Bill

    Authored by Brayden Lindrea via CoinTelegraph.com,

    The US Senate has voted to advance a key stablecoin-regulating bill after Democratic senators blocked an earlier attempt to move the bill forward over concerns about President Donald Trump’s sprawling crypto empire.

    A key procedural vote on the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins Act, or GENIUS Act, passed in a 66-32 vote on May 19 local time.

    Several Democrats, including Mark Warner, Adam Schiff and Ruben Gallego, changed their votes to pass the motion to invoke cloture, which will now set the bill up for debate on the Senate floor.

    Republican Senator Cynthia Lummis, one of the bill’s key backers, said on May 15 that she thinks it’s a “fair target” to have the GENIUS Act passed by May 26 — Memorial Day in the US.

    The US Senate voted 66-32 to advance debate on the GENIUS stablecoin bill. Source: US Senate

    Several Democratic senators withdrew support for the bill on May 8, blocking a motion to move it forward, citing concerns over potential conflicts of interest involving Trump’s crypto ventures and the bill’s Anti-Money Laundering provisions.

    Warner expressed concerns about Trump’s crypto ventures in a statement before the vote, but said the US couldn’t “afford to keep standing on the sidelines” while the crypto industry evolves.

    “We cannot allow that corruption to blind us to the broader reality: blockchain technology is here to stay. If American lawmakers don’t shape it, others will — and not in ways that serve our interests or democratic values.”

    Warren says bill won’t stop Trump’s “crypto corruption”

    Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren, a longtime crypto skeptic, was one of the strongest opponents of the stablecoin bill, arguing before the vote that it failed to address Trump’s “blatant crypto corruption.”

    Trump and his family have recently launched various crypto projects, which include memecoins, a crypto platform, a crypto mining company that plans to go public and a stablecoin that has quickly grown to be the seventh-largest by value, CoinGecko data shows.

    ”Trump and his family have already pocketed hundreds of millions of dollars from his crypto ventures, and they stand to make hundreds of millions more from his stablecoin, USD1, if this bill passes,” she said.

    Senator Bill Hagerty introduced the GENIUS Act on Feb. 4, which seeks to regulate the nearly $250 billion stablecoin market, currently dominated by Tether and Circle’s USDC.

    The bill requires stablecoins to be fully backed, have regular security audits and approval from federal or state regulators. Only licensed entities can issue stablecoins, while algorithmic stablecoins are restricted.

    Hagerty’s stablecoin bill builds on the discussion draft he submitted for former Representative Patrick McHenry’s Clarity for Payment Stablecoins Act in October.

    Tyler Durden Tue, 05/20/2025 - 08:05
  42. Site: AsiaNews.it
    2 days 8 hours ago
    How will the new Pope manage the relationship between Beijing and the VaticanThe faithful in mainland China hope that the bishops to be appointed and approved under the agreement will truly love the faithful and know their flock. That they will be skilled in pastoral care and enjoy the support of the faithful. Only in this way will a bishop be able to guide the faithful to love both their country and the Church.
  43. Site: southern orders
    2 days 8 hours ago


    Catholic orthodoxy is the only way to heal the radical polarization that conservative and liberals have caused the church and their heated, ugly and mean-spirited rhetoric tossed at either side and to the pope himself and bishops in union with him.

    This is Catholic orthodoxy:

    1. It is orthodox to embrace all the social teachings of the Church, especially those in papal enclyicals like Pope Leo XIII! 

    2. It is orthodox to allow migrants and those persecuted in their own countries to have access to countries when they can be safe and provide a standard quality of life for them and their families.

    3. It is orthodox for countries to have laws that protect the integrity of their borders and allow controlled immigration verses an invasion of all kinds of people, even those with criminal records of violent crimes.

    4. It is orthodox to ask secular governments who have allowed unbridled immigration to treat with respect and due process those who came in because the government allowed illegal immigration. It is orthodox to ask secular governments to allow those who have contributed to their new communities, are otherwise law abiding to have a way to be made regular without deportation.

    5. It is orthodox to have a concern for the poor and marginalized and to promote the Church’s sexual morality without being mean spirited toward those who fail to follow Church teachings. 

    6. It is orthodox to crack down on bad and immodest behaviors in the Church by those who practice disordered sexual preferences by flaunting it and demanding that they be included in the Church’s public worship while committed sacrilege and insults toward our Lord and then toward orthodox Catholics present for prayer and the liturgies of the Church. It is orthodox to demand proper and modest dress in church according to the cultural norms concerning the only two biological genders male and female.

    7. It is orthodox for a Catholic to prefer the TLM and its ancillary sacramental liturgies.

    8. It is orthodox to prefer a rubrical correct Modern Vernacular Mass and its ancillary liturgies

    9. It is orthodox to allow both forms of the one Roman Rite to co-exist in the same parish

    10. It is orthodox to reject an ecclesiology that becomes a false god and obfuscates Christ by placing human elements of organization and who does what above an experience of the Risen Lord

    11. It is orthodox to reject the deification of any Council of the Church or any Pope making these a false god

    12. It is orthodox to develop pastoral theologies that assist pastors and others who minister to people who are in broken and dysfunctional lives and relationships as long as these are within the internal forum 

    13. Synodality is orthodox when it is relegated to the Faith, Morals and Canon laws of the Church and doesn’t become a false god that elevates walking together while neglecting the one who leads us, Jesus  the Risen Lord. 

    I can go on and on!

  44. Site: Zero Hedge
    2 days 8 hours ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    Chinese Smartphone Exports To US Crashed In April

    New customs data from China shows that smartphone shipments to the U.S. collapsed 72% in April to below $700 million—the lowest level since 2011. The plunge coincided with the peak of the U.S.-China trade war, as the Trump administration imposed up to 145% tariffs on Chinese goods, disrupting tech supply chains. However, those levies have since been significantly scaled back to 30% as of May.

    Using data from China's General Administration of Customs, Bloomberg reported that the 72% plunge in smartphone shipments to the U.S. far outpaced the 21% decline in overall exports to the U.S.

    China's export data showed that handsets and laptops suffered the largest shipping declines in April.

    April marked the peak of the trade war, with President Trump imposing tariffs of up to 145% on Chinese goods and Beijing retaliating with 125% tariffs on U.S. products. By mid-May, trade tensions had eased, with U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods reduced to 30% and China's tariffs on U.S. goods lowered to 10%.

    However, the so-called "breakthrough" trade deal between the U.S. and China last week has Goldman analyst Philip Sun forecasting a surge in imports for U.S. ports. This has abruptly reversed the "empty ports" and "empty shelves" narratives; now, U.S. importers expect to pull forward.

    Goldman's Sun explained: "China's exports will be RED HOT in the next 90 days. Frontrunning would be the keyword."

    Meanwhile, Apple accelerated a shift of iPhone production to India in anticipation of the trade war. 

    Last week, President Trump, on his Gulf States tour, publicly called out Apple CEO Tim Cook for the massive expansion of iPhone production in India. Trump said after his conversation about 'Made in America', the CEO would be "upping their production in the United States." 

    Wedbush Securities recently estimated that a fully American-made iPhone could cost as much as $3,500, compared to the current average price of around $1,000. There are reports the next model could see the first price hike since the 2017 debut of the iPhone X.

    Next lineup of iPhone...

     . . . 

    Tyler Durden Tue, 05/20/2025 - 07:45
  45. Site: PaulCraigRoberts.org
    2 days 8 hours ago
    Author: pcr3

    Hillary Endorses White Replacement

    Paul Craig Roberts

    In a recent speech to a Democrat audience Hillary Clinton reaffirms that it is Democrat Party Policy to Replace White Americans with Immigrant-invaders. Hillary blasted the Trump regime’s emphasis on “return to the family, the nuclear family, return to being a Christian nation, return to producing a lot of children.”  It is all a dastardly right-wing trick to take away women’s rights to have careers instead of children.  Having children, she said is the function of immigrant-invaders, not of white women.

    She told the Democrat audience that “this very blatant effort to basically send a message most exemplified by Vance and Musk, and others, that, you know, what we really need from you women are more children. And what that really means is you should go back to doing what you were born to do, which is to produce more children.”  Now that feminists have taught women to take over the male role, here are the vile Trump Republicans trying to roll back the liberation of women from the home and children.

    The question is, where can an American male find a female life partner? That is not what an indoctrinated feminist wants to be.  She wants to be independent, not constrained by a supportive relationship. Perhaps white American males can find wives among the female immigrant-invaders.  The resulting miscegenation destroys both races, thus the result is to eliminate diversity.  Funny, isn’t it, that the dumbshit liberal-left is so stupid that they don’t realize that the result of multiculturalism is the elimination of racial diversity.

    Hillary, in her unbridled ignorance, actually said that unlike Europe, America’s welcoming of immigrant-invaders has caused our economy  to do “so much better than comparable advanced economies across the world.” Hillary says, “we actually had a replenishment, because we had a lot of immigrants, legally and undocumented, who had, you know, larger than normal by American standards, families.”

    Does Hillary not know that all of Europe and the formerly British are overrun with immigrant invaders, and that these invaders are protected by the EU and UK governments?  So what is the basis of Hillary’s claim that the US, unlike “comparable advanced economies,” is the beneficiary of illegal immigration?

    Don’t ask the stupid Hillary.  She doesn’t know.

    Will the morons who vote Democrat notice these revelations? Are they willing to turn their country over to immigrant-invaders in exchange for the right of white women to appropriate the male role?

    It is absolutely clear that the achievement of feminism will be the elimination of white ethnicities. Already corporate advertisers are pushing miscegenation.  Seldom do you see a white family in a corporate ad.  Miscegenation is a two-edged sword.  It replaces both races with a new rootless being without a race, a history, and a culture.

    America is being erased, both whites and blacks, but Americans are too insouciant to notice.

    https://thepostmillennial.com/hillary-clinton-criticizes-pro-birth-policies-says-immigrants-are-key-to-us-growth 

  46. Site: Catholic Conclave
    2 days 8 hours ago
      The people who made the video say they are scared.Catholic Conclavehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06227218883606585321noreply@blogger.com0
  47. Site: Zero Hedge
    2 days 8 hours ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    "They Want War" - Martin Armstrong Slams European Leaders Reinstating Military Drafts

    Via  Greg Hunter’s USAWatchdog.com,

    Legendary financial and geopolitical cycle analyst Martin Armstrong is back with an update on his big turn toward war in Ukraine with Russia.  

    Two weeks ago on USAW, Armstrong predicted, After May 15, war is turning up (in Ukraine) and it will be turning up into 2026.”  

    That prediction paid off to the exact day as peace talks between Russia and Ukraine ended on May 15 after just two hours, and neither side agreed to meet again.  

    War is already here, and there is no stopping it with peace talks.  Armstrong says, “Putin knows and understands this is not a just a war with Ukraine, this is a war with NATO..."

    "If Putin agrees to a 30-day ceasefire with Ukraine, what’s that going to do?  Absolutely nothing.  

    You have every European country reinstituting drafts.  In Germany, even people 60 years old have been told to report.  Poland has ordered every able-bodied man to show up for military training.  They want war.  Their economy is collapsing.  You hear about this de-dollarization, and it’s not happening.  The capitalization of just the New York Stock Exchange is worth more than all of Europe combined.  That’s just the New York Stock Exchange...

    You’ve got Macron in France, they call him the ‘Petite Napolean.’. . . Without war, Europe is going to collapse.  It’s in a sovereign debt crisis . . . They have done everything against the economy.”

    Armstong thinks Russia will finish off Ukraine sometime in 2027 and Europe a year or two after that.  And, Yes, Armstrong still thinks Ukraine will disappear from the map.

    Armstrong urged his contacts in Washington to “Get the hell out of NATO.”  It seems some in the US government are considering this warning as this headline breaks today: “US to Begin European Troop Withdrawal Talks, NATO Ambassador Says.”  Armstrong says, 

    “I have been told by some very influential people on Capitol Hill ‘you’re right, we agree.’  That’s what I have been told. . . . I have been complaining about this for months, and my view is Europe is committing suicide, and let’s not be part of it this time.”

    Is President Trump getting this message?  Armstrong says, “Yes, I believe so. . . . Trump also said a peace deal does not seem likely, the hatred is too great on both sides.”

    The neocons back home also want war with Russia and have wanted it for a very long time.  Trump is either going to make peace or walk away and not participate.  Maybe this is why former FBI Director James Comey put out his not-so-cryptic call to assassinate President Trump with his “86 47” now deleted Instagram post.  Comey was the man who held Armstrong in prison illegally for contempt for 7 years. 

    Armstrong says, “Comey has always been part of it.  Just for the record, he was the US Attorney in New York.  He’s the one who kept me in contempt until the Supreme Court said what the hell is going on?  Then, they had to release me.”

    How did Armstrong land in jail?  

    Armstrong says, “They asked me to put in 10 billion dollars . . . to take over Russia, and I refused..."

    "  It was Comey that was the US Attorney for New York, and he kept me in civil contempt, which has a maximum sentence of 18 months, and he kept me in for 7 years.  

    He kept rolling it and rolling it and rolling it. . . . I was told if I put in $10 billion, I would get $100 billion back.  

    They intended to have all the assets of Russia going through the trading desk of New York.  All the oil, gold, diamonds, platinum, you name it, they would have it all.  And I said, no, I’m out.  I am not into regime change.”

    Fast forward to today, and the powers in Europe still think they can take Russia and steal their assets to fix the extreme financial problems in Europe.  

    Pensions, banks and bonds are in deep financial trouble in Europe.  

    Stealing from Russia and gaining control of $75 trillion in natural resources is why they want and need war.  Armstrong says, 

    “They went to negative interest rates in 2014.  I warned them.  I said listen; you are out of your minds.  

    You are syphoning money out of the bank reserves and pension finds.  It’s a basket case.  It really is.  They have no appreciable economy. . . it’s shrinking, the number of actual businesses has shrunk in Germany.  (Germany is 25% of the EU economy.)  This is why they need war.”

    Armstrong says Europe is going to lose and lose badly in a war with Russia.  

    Armstrong says if Trump gets out of NATO, the US will thrive and do much better financially than Europe.  

    Let’s all hope President Trump gets us out of NATO before it’s too late.

    There is much more in the 60-minute interview.

    Join Greg Hunter of USAWatchdog.com as he goes One-on-One with Martin Armstrong as he gives his analysis on war, default, depression and unpayable debt that will make a huge mess for the world for 5.17.25.

    To Donate to USAWatchdog.com click here

    There is free information, analysis and articles on ArmstrongEconomics.com.

    Tyler Durden Tue, 05/20/2025 - 07:20
  48. Site: Mises Institute
    2 days 9 hours ago
    Author: Matthew Williams
    Robert Kennedy‘s Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) crusade is being promoted as a government-led effort to eliminate health hazards in food and medicine. However, MAHA depends upon government overreach, which ultimately will undermine any good MAHA does.
  49. Site: Zero Hedge
    2 days 9 hours ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    Buy Now, Pay Never? Klarna's Losses Double As US Consumers Fall Behind On Payments

    In an absolute shocker that you'll never believe (unless you read ZeroHedge) - Klarna, the Swedish financial technology firm known for its "buy now, pay later" (BNPL) offerings, reported a sharp increase in losses for the first quarter, driven by a rise in consumer defaults and economic unease in the United States.

    The company posted a net loss of $99 million for the three months ending in March, more than double its $47 million loss during the same period a year earlier. The deterioration comes amid a rise in customer credit losses, which climbed 17 percent year-on-year to $136 million, underscoring mounting concerns about the financial health of U.S. borrowers.

    Klarna’s business model - providing interest-free installment loans for retail purchases - has grown rapidly in recent years, especially in the United States, where the company has partnered with major retailers such as Walmart, eBay and DoorDash. But the surge in unpaid loans and shifting macroeconomic conditions have intensified scrutiny of the company’s exposure to economic headwinds, according to the Financial Times.

    The results also follow Klarna’s decision to halt its long-anticipated initial public offering in New York, after recent tariff announcements from President Donald Trump roiled markets. The administration’s trade policy has heightened inflation expectations and dampened consumer sentiment, with one widely watched confidence index falling to its second-lowest level on record last week.

    Despite the growing defaults, Klarna emphasized the short-term nature of its loan book, noting that 83 percent of its balances refresh within three months. The company said in a statement that it's "closely monitoring changes in the macroeconomic environment," and "remains well-positioned to adapt swiftly if required."

    Klarna’s credit loss rate as a share of total payment volume remains relatively modest at 0.54 percent, a slight uptick from 0.51 percent a year earlier.

    Revenues for the quarter rose 13 percent to $701 million, as the platform reached 99 million active users. The company has leaned heavily on artificial intelligence to streamline operations, delivering Monday’s earnings through an AI-generated avatar of its chief executive.

    Klarna has also pursued aggressive cost-cutting, reducing its headcount by 39 percent over the past two years. Customer service expenses declined 12 percent year-on-year in the latest quarter. At the same time, the company is grappling with a 15 percent rise in funding costs, now totaling $130 million.

    Last month we noted that Americans are increasingly tapping Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL) financing to pay for daily essentials -- even groceries -- according to a Lending Tree survey, in which  41% of those polled say they were late on payments over the past year, which is up from 34% in last year's survey. About three-quarters of the late-payers say they were late by no more than "a week or so." However, where that and other numbers are concerned, it's important to note that these stats are based on survey responses -- not the hard data of their BNPL providers. Given human nature, it's reasonable to think respondents would understate subpar behavior. 

    The top two categories of BNPL purchases are clothing, shoes and accessories (41% of BNPL users) followed by technology devices (39%). However, there's been a surge in people who've used BNPL for groceries -- 25% versus 14% last year.  A whopping one-third of Gen Z BNPL-tappers say they've used the financing for groceries. Similarly, 16% of users have tapped BNPL for food delivery or takeout.

    "Have you ever used BNPL services like Affirm or Klarna?" (via Lending Tree)

    Other findings:

    • Nearly half of the respondents have used a BNPL loan, with 11% saying they've used them 6 or more times. 23% have had three or more of them running simultaneously.  
    • 53% of men have used BNPL, versus 46% of female respondents. 
    • 64% of Gen Zers (age 18 to 28) have used BNPL, compared to 29% of Boomers (61 to 79)
    Tyler Durden Tue, 05/20/2025 - 06:55
  50. Site: AsiaNews.it
    2 days 10 hours ago
    Low turnout in some areas (a meagre 21% in the capital) and the absence of a national vision on decentralisation stand out as key challenges. These factors continue to hinder the emergence of a truly autonomous local authority. Nonetheless, the vote marks a positive step in view of the 2026 parliamentary elections.

Pages

Subscribe to Distinction Matter - Subscribed Feeds