Distinction Matter - Subscribed Feeds

  1. Site: RT - News
    1 week 4 days ago
    Author: RT

    The US president has warned of crippling sanctions on the Tehran’s oil industry if it rejects Washington’s “olive branch”

    US President Donald Trump has threatened to reduce Iran’s oil exports to zero if ongoing talks in Oman fail, which are aimed at reviving the 2015 nuclear deal. In 2018, Trump unilaterally withdrew from the accord that eased sanctions on Tehran in exchange for curbs on its nuclear program.

    “If Iran’s leadership rejects this olive branch... we will have no choice but to inflict massive maximum pressure, drive Iranian oil exports to zero,” Trump said at the Saudi-US Investment Forum in Riyadh on Tuesday.

    The US president reminded the audience of the crippling sanctions he imposed in 2018, which he claimed left Iran’s economy on the brink of collapse. “They were a virtually bankrupt country because of what I did,” he claimed.

    In 2023, the UN Human Rights Council reported that Washington’s sanctions prevented Iranians from receiving vital medical care. The report noted that producers, shippers, insurers, or banks are reluctant to do business with Iran, fearing “aggressive US sanctions enforcement and penalties.” This has led to “fear, pain and premature death,” it added.

    Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi reported progress in the negotiations with the US, noting that the two sides have reached “a better understanding.”

    Read more Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian. Iran rejects ‘unacceptable’ US nuclear demand

    Trump withdrew the US from the 2015 UN-backed deal on Iran’s nuclear program during his first term in office, accusing the Islamic Republic of secretly violating the agreement. Tehran has denied any wrongdoing but has since rolled back its own commitments under the deal and increased its stockpile of enriched uranium.

    The US and its allies have expressed concern about Iran’s enrichment activities, which they fear could provide the country with a head start to quickly produce weapons-grade uranium.

    On Sunday, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian rejected a key US demand to dismantle his country’s nuclear infrastructure.

    Tehran has insisted that its nuclear activities are for peaceful purposes only and has repeatedly dismissed the allegations that it is seeking to create a nuclear bomb.

  2. Site: Zero Hedge
    1 week 4 days ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    'Biggest Untold Story in Tech': Explosive Book Reveals How Apple Sold Out America To China

    Financial Times journalist Patrick McGee has released a gripping new book that meticulously exposes Apple’s deeply troubling ties with China, revealing how these connections fueled the communist regime’s rise to a global manufacturing powerhouse.

    (Nikkei Montage / Reuters)

    In an interview with The Free Press founder Bari Weiss, McGee revealed key insights from his new book, Apple in China, detailing Apple’s complex relationship with the country.

    Presently, approximately 155 million Americans own an iPhone - a remarkable figure that McGee contends would have been unattainable without Apple’s substantial investments in China.

    “I think it’s fairly straightforward that China is the only place on the planet that has the tech competence in terms of manufacturing capability, certainly the price, the cost, the quantity, the scale,” McGee told Weiss. My novel argument is that it has those skills because Apple built them there, right? It’s not that China offered something to Apple. Apple didn’t find these skills in China; it shipped people over by the plane load and created them.

    .@PatrickMcGee_ lays out how Apple helped China become a manufacturing superpower:

    "The number of people they trained in China since 2008 is 28 million people—larger than California's labor force."

    "Apple is investing in China at twice the annual spend of the Marshall Plan." pic.twitter.com/PHDHLSBHKz

    — Josh Caplan (@joshdcaplan) May 13, 2025

    “And so it’s this another layer of nuance that Apple is dependent on the very capabilities that it created. And I think this is like the biggest untold story in tech over the last 25 years. And like, my jaw was on the floor as I talked to 200 people and sort of unraveled it all. But I mean, some of the numbers— anytime you’re dealing with Apple, the numbers are just crazy. And so the two numbers that really stick out at me are that the number of people they have trained in China since 2008 is 28 million,” the Apple in China authored continued.”

    That’s larger than the labor force of California. And the investments they were making in China by 2015 were $55 billion a year. And that’s such a large number that I couldn’t find any corporate equivalent,” he added. “I had to go to nation-building efforts, and I took the Marshall Plan, the most famous nation-building effort ever, converted it to 2015 dollars, and you realize that Apple’s investing in China twice that of the annual spend of the Marshall Plan. And the Marshall Plan was for 16 countries.”

    McGee outlines Apple's production hurdles and economic incentives that propelled this transformative shift, which he compares to a geopolitical event as significant as the fall of the Berlin Wall.

    “I have these chapters in the book where they're trying to build iPods and the Sunflower iMac. You might remember it; it sort of looks anthropomorphic, like a Pixar lamp. It's really sexy, and my God, is it a complicated product to build,” McGee said. “And so Apple's trying to do it in Taiwan, but with the help of Singapore, Japan—you know, basically all of Southeast Asia, including China. But the more you're doing things a little bit in China and comparing the costs, the flexible demand of labor, and just the armies of affordable labor, the more it looks like China is the way to go. And they just rapidly begin to consolidate in 2003.

    Author @PatrickMcGee_: The West “sleepwalked” into making China a global powerhouse.

    Corporations like Apple “were setting up the world’s most sophisticated supply chain—and made the rookie and calamitous mistake of putting all their eggs in one basket. And that basket… pic.twitter.com/ASZTatTikm

    — Honestly with Bari Weiss (@thehonestlypod) May 13, 2025

    “So, the sort of fun line I have is that in 1999, zero products from Apple were being made in China. By 2009, virtually all of them were. And that transition, I compare to a geopolitical event, like the fall of the Berlin Wall. But it took place over many years. And it's one that I don't think we've really grappled with or understood,” the author added.

    Under Tim Cook’s leadership, Apple has significantly deepened its investment in China, most notably through a secretive $275 billion, five-year agreement signed in 2016 with Chinese officials to bolster the country’s economy and technological capabilities, The Information reported in 2021. The deal, aimed at mitigating regulatory threats, included commitments to build new retail stores, research and development centers, and renewable energy projects, while fostering partnerships with local suppliers like Foxconn and enhancing China’s supply chain infrastructure.

    President Donald Trump has been pushing Apple to move its manufacturing away from China, primarily through aggressive tariff policies aimed at incentivizing U.S.-based production. Since his first term, Trump has consistently advocated for Apple to bring iPhone and other product manufacturing to the United States, famously vowing in 2016, “I’m going to get Apple to start making their computers and their iPhones on our land, not in China.

    Apple has responded by shifting production for U.S.-bound iPhones to India and iPads, Apple Watches, and other products to Vietnam, with Cook confirming that by 2026, most iPhones sold in the U.S. will be made in India.

    In February 2025, Apple announced a commitment to invest over $500 billion in the U.S. over the next four years, aimed at strengthening domestic manufacturing and advancing semiconductor production.

    Tyler Durden Tue, 05/13/2025 - 16:40
  3. Site: ChurchPOP
    1 week 4 days ago
    Author: Caroline Perkins

    After one of the shortest conclaves in recent history, Cardinal Robert Prevost was elected the 267th successor to Saint Peter. He took the name Leo XIV.

    During his first address, the Holy Father briefly explained his spiritual background, saying,

    “I am a son of Saint Augustine, an Augustinian. He said, ‘With you I am a Christian, for you a bishop.’ So may we all walk together towards that homeland that God has prepared for us.”saint augustine quotesCaroline Perkins, ChurchPOP

    As we pray for the Holy Father, let us turn to the inspirational wisdom of his friend in heaven, Saint Augustine, Doctor of the Church:

    saint augustine quotesCaroline Perkins, ChurchPOP“Pray as though everything depended on God. Work as though everything depended on you.” - Saint Augustinesaint augustine quotesCaroline Perkins, ChurchPOP“Patience is the companion of wisdom.” - Saint Augustinesaint augustine quotesCaroline Perkins, ChurchPOP "To fall in love with God is the greatest romance; to seek Him is the greatest adventure; to find Him, the greatest human achievement." - Saint Augustinesaint augustine quotesCaroline Perkins, ChurchPOP“God had one son on earth without sin, but never one without suffering.” - Saint Augustinesaint augustine quotesCaroline Perkins, ChurchPOP“Seek not to understand that you may believe, but believe that you may understand.” - Saint Augustinesaint augustine quotesCaroline Perkins, ChurchPOP“The confession of evil works is the first beginning of good works.” - Saint Augustinesaint augustine quotesCaroline Perkins, ChurchPOP“There is something in humility which strangely exalts the heart.” - Saint Augustinesaint augustine quotesCaroline Perkins, ChurchPOP“Faith is to believe what you do not see; the reward of this faith is to see what you believe.” - Saint Augustinesaint augustine quotesCaroline Perkins, ChurchPOP“God loves each of us as if there were only one of us.” - Saint Augustinesaint augustine quotesCaroline Perkins, ChurchPOP“If you believe what you like in the Gospels, and reject what you don’t like, it is not the gospel you believe, but yourself.” - Saint Augustinesaint augustine quotesCaroline Perkins, ChurchPOP“For you made us for yourself, and our hearts are restless until they find their rest in you.” - Saint Augustine

    Saint Augustine of Hippo is a magnificent saint in the Catholic Church.

    As a theologian and philosopher, he laid the framework for the doctrine of original sin and salvation. He is also known for his miraculous conversion, detailed in one of his most notable works, “Confessions,” among many other writings that largely impacted Western Christianity as we know it today.

    You can learn more about Saint Augustine here.

  4. Site: ChurchPOP
    1 week 4 days ago
    Author: Caroline Perkins

    After one of the shortest conclaves in recent history, Cardinal Robert Prevost was elected the 267th successor to Saint Peter. He took the name Leo XIV.

    During his first address, the Holy Father briefly explained his spiritual background, saying,

    “I am a son of Saint Augustine, an Augustinian. He said, ‘With you I am a Christian, for you a bishop.’ So may we all walk together towards that homeland that God has prepared for us.”saint augustine quotesCaroline Perkins, ChurchPOP

    As we pray for the Holy Father, let us turn to the inspirational wisdom of his friend in heaven, Saint Augustine, Doctor of the Church:

    saint augustine quotesCaroline Perkins, ChurchPOP“Pray as though everything depended on God. Work as though everything depended on you.” - Saint Augustinesaint augustine quotesCaroline Perkins, ChurchPOP“Patience is the companion of wisdom.” - Saint Augustinesaint augustine quotesCaroline Perkins, ChurchPOP "To fall in love with God is the greatest romance; to seek Him is the greatest adventure; to find Him, the greatest human achievement." - Saint Augustinesaint augustine quotesCaroline Perkins, ChurchPOP“God had one son on earth without sin, but never one without suffering.” - Saint Augustinesaint augustine quotesCaroline Perkins, ChurchPOP“Seek not to understand that you may believe, but believe that you may understand.” - Saint Augustinesaint augustine quotesCaroline Perkins, ChurchPOP“The confession of evil works is the first beginning of good works.” - Saint Augustinesaint augustine quotesCaroline Perkins, ChurchPOP“There is something in humility which strangely exalts the heart.” - Saint Augustinesaint augustine quotesCaroline Perkins, ChurchPOP“Faith is to believe what you do not see; the reward of this faith is to see what you believe.” - Saint Augustinesaint augustine quotesCaroline Perkins, ChurchPOP“God loves each of us as if there were only one of us.” - Saint Augustinesaint augustine quotesCaroline Perkins, ChurchPOP“If you believe what you like in the Gospels, and reject what you don’t like, it is not the gospel you believe, but yourself.” - Saint Augustinesaint augustine quotesCaroline Perkins, ChurchPOP“For you made us for yourself, and our hearts are restless until they find their rest in you.” - Saint Augustine

    Saint Augustine of Hippo is a magnificent saint in the Catholic Church.

    As a theologian and philosopher, he laid the framework for the doctrine of original sin and salvation. He is also known for his miraculous conversion, detailed in one of his most notable works, “Confessions,” among many other writings that largely impacted Western Christianity as we know it today.

    You can learn more about Saint Augustine here.

  5. Site: Zero Hedge
    1 week 4 days ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    Nodule Found In Biden's Prostate During Routine Exam

    Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times,

    A small nodule was found in former President Joe Biden’s prostate during an exam, a spokesperson told news outlets on May 13.

    “In a routine physical exam, a small nodule was found in the prostate, which necessitated further evaluation,” the Biden spokesperson said.

    It’s not clear whether the additional evaluation has already taken place and, if it has, what it showed.

    A nodule could indicate the presence of prostate cancer.

    Out of every 100 men in America, about 13 will suffer from prostate cancer during their lifetime, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 

    Early treatment can eliminate the cancer, which is fatal in a minority of cases.

    The most common risk factor is age. Biden is 82.

    Biden wrote in an Aug. 20, 2024, proclamation during National Prostate Cancer Awareness Month that “we mourn all the courageous men we have tragically lost too soon to prostate cancer” and “we honor the extraordinary resilience of those currently living with and surviving this disease.”

    Biden left office in January after a single term. He initially launched a reelection bid, but later dropped out under pressure from some fellow Democrats due to his advanced age. President Donald Trump, 78, beat former Vice President Kamala Harris, 60, in the 2024 election.

    Dr. Kevin O‘Connor, Biden’s physician, reported in 2023 that Biden had a cancerous lesion removed from his chest. The area around the biopsy site was treated, O’Connor said, and no further treatment was required.

    “The site of the biopsy has healed nicely and the President will continue dermatologic surveillance as part of his ongoing comprehensive healthcare,” he wrote at the time.

    O'Connor also said in 2019 that Biden had a polyp removed from his colon, describing the polyp as “potentially pre-cancerous.”

    One of Biden’s sons, Beau, died in 2015 from brain cancer.

    Ahead of the election in 2024, O'Connor said that an examination showed that Biden was healthy and active.

    Biden “remains fit to successfully execute the duties of the Presidency, to include those as Chief Executive, Head of State and Commander in Chief,” O'Connor wrote in a summary of the exam.

    In his first interview since Trump was sworn in, Biden said recently that he did not have any cognitive issues and that he understands the concerns about his age.

    “I get it,” Biden said. “I understand the concern. I really do. But the point of the matter is that I would offer specific evidence, if we had time, [of] exactly what I got done when I supposedly lost my cognitive capability.”

    Tyler Durden Tue, 05/13/2025 - 16:20
  6. Site: Euthanasia Prevention Coalition
    1 week 4 days ago
    Alex Schadenberg
    Executive Director, Euthanasia Prevention Coalition

    Madeline Grant was published in the Telegraph on May 13, 2025 in response to the vote on the Scottish assisted suicide bill. Sadly, the Scottish parliament passed the assisted suicide bill (at second reading) by a vote of 70 - 56.

    Grant's article titled: In the name of progress: eugenics then, euthanasia now, states that in the past, eugenics was considered progressive and look at the atrocities associated with eugenics. Today euthanasia is considered progressive. Grant writes:
    It was in the name of progress that the Fabian and socialist eugenicists – from Beatrice and Sidney Webb to Bertrand Russell and Marie Stopes – advocated the sterilisation of the disabled and sick during the 20th century. It was in the name of progress that George Bernard Shaw supported “the socialisation of the selective breeding of man”, even, chillingly, proposing the euthanasia of the mentally ill and other members of the “unfit” classes via “extensive use of the lethal chamber”. In short; a very dangerous word indeed. This isn’t just a history lesson either; the groups these people supported still exist. Dignity in Dying, the main advocacy group for assisted dying, was founded by a member of the Eugenics Society and was known until 2006 as The Voluntary Euthanasia Society.Grant then comments on the current assisted suicide debate in the UK:
    In our own day, the same concept is being invoked once more as a sort of unanswerable force. The debate over assisted suicide is intensifying on both sides of the Border this week, as Kim Leadbeater’s Private Members’ Bill returns to Parliament and Holyrood MSPs voted in favour of a similar Bill proposed by Lib Dem Liam McArthur. In her efforts to champion her Bill on social media, the former is emerging as someone with Van Gogh’s ear for diplomacy; both tactless and self-aggrandising. This week she dismissed opponents as “scaremongering and ideological”, while quoting praise of herself from a supporter, describing her as a “social reformer”. At least irony hasn’t been assisted with its death.Grant explains how the assisted suicide campaign refers to its goals as progressive and the opponents as scare mongers:
    The inconvenient truth is that, in this case progress involves the sidelining and rejection of the very people whose needs it claims to advance. The Royal College of Physicians recently published a statement warning that the Bill’s “deficiencies” render it unsafe for patients and doctors. Was this “scaremongering”? Every user-led disability group opposes the change, as do a majority of palliative care professionals. Are they “ideologues” too?Grant then refers to the former Scottish Tory Leader, Ruth Davidson support ofr assisted suicide because she wants to be on the "right side of history":
    It is telling that despite supporting assisted suicide in principle, former Scots Tory Leader Ruth Davidson couldn’t quite endorse the parallel Bill before Holyrood in its current form. Instead, in a column this week, she urges MSPs simply to trust that they will be able to iron out any problems at a later date. She also cites the number of countries around the world offering assisted suicide as if this, in itself, constituted an argument. What many of these jurisdictions actually show is quite the opposite to Davidson’s Panglossian faith that everything will work itself out.Grant then comments on the language of the debate:
    A particularly invidious aspect of this debate has been the manipulation of language. Not only is there a tendency to imply, per Leadbeater, that the pro-side has a monopoly on compassion, relatives’ understandable efforts to prevent their loved ones from taking their own lives have sometimes been reframed as “coercion”. During the “expert” witness testimony, one Australian MP referred to “assisted dying” in exquisitely Orwellian fashion, as a form of “suicide prevention”. There has even been some squeamishness about using the word “suicide” at all, though the Bill would by definition amend the 1961 Suicide Act. It’s as if they fear this serious change to the social fabric will be impossible without annexing language to limit what their opponents may say. And now, showing tragedy and farce are far closer than we think, Kim Leadbeater is apparently a “social reformer”.The social reformers will not consult the people they supposedly support. Grant writes:
    The irony is that Leadbeater and her allies no doubt think of themselves and their actions as progressive. Yet each of them is simultaneously engaged in the business of ignoring the voices of the poor and the vulnerable.Grant concludes her article by arguing that Leadbeater is doing more to undo social healthcare than Thatcher did with privatisation.
    This Bill is so comprehensively at odds with the principles of previous social reform that enacting it will mean rewriting the Bill on which the National Health Service was forged. The legislation is so far-sweeping that the Bill’s proponents may become the first people to undo the basic healthcare principle that life should be preserved. This is worth restating for all the “sensibles” out there; it wasn’t Mrs Thatcher or “Tory privatisation”, but a Labour backbencher who will fundamentally change the stated purpose of the NHS – and in a final irony, will do so not in the name of profit but of progress.
    More articles on this topic:
    • Rush to legalize assisted suicide (UK) - Have the vulnerable become expendable (Link)?
  7. Site: Crisis Magazine
    1 week 4 days ago
    Author: Jason Jones

    The corporate media is already spilling tons of ink to paint a picture of a pope and a U.S. president with nothing in common. Reports even goad Pope Leo XIV and President Donald Trump against each other. And to the pro-war ruling classes and their agents in the media, there’s an urgent reason to drive a wedge between the two men: They are almost totally aligned on the bedrock moral issue of our…

    Source

  8. Site: Zero Hedge
    1 week 4 days ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    Bitcoin Treasury Exposure Goes Mainstream As Coinbase Soars On Joining The S&P 500

    On May 19, 2025, Coinbase will officially join the S&P 500 - widely regarded as the most trusted, most tracked equity index in the world. With over $5 trillion in assets benchmarked to it, the S&P 500 isn’t just a measure of corporate strength - it’s a gravitational center of global capital allocation.

    And starting next week, it will include Bitcoin treasury company.

    Coinbase currently holds 9,267 BTC on its balance sheet, valued at $963.8 million at today’s price of $104,000 per Bitcoin, making it the 9th largest public corporate Bitcoin holder globally.

    As Nick Ward reports for BitcoinMagazine.com, this marks a quiet turning point for Bitcoin in capital markets - one that reframes the treasury conversation and reshapes how companies think about index eligibility, institutional flows, and balance sheet strategy.

    The Most Passive Flows in Finance Just Found Bitcoin

    Coinbase’s addition to the index means something profound: millions of investors will soon have indirect exposure to Bitcoin—and they didn’t choose it.

    Because the S&P 500 is tracked by passive strategies, funds and institutions must purchase Coinbase stock in proportion to its index weight. If Coinbase is assigned even a 0.20% weighting, that implies more than $10 billion in net inflows from index-tracking vehicles.

    This is not speculative capital. This is mandatory exposure—capital governed by rules, not conviction.

    And for the first time, those rules lead directly to Bitcoin.

    Bitcoin Treasuries Are Now Index-Eligible

    For years, Bitcoin on the corporate balance sheet was treated as a novelty—or worse, a liability. But Coinbase’s inclusion signals something different: Bitcoin exposure is now compatible with the highest standards of institutional eligibility.

    It’s a powerful validation for public companies already holding Bitcoin—and a strategic consideration for those that aren’t. Index inclusion is not reserved for fiat-only treasuries. Coinbase’s addition confirms that sound operations and a Bitcoin-aligned balance sheet are not mutually exclusive.

    In fact, they may now be complementary.

    Strategy May Be Next to Join The S&P 500

    Coinbase may be the first S&P 500 company with a Bitcoin treasury—but it likely won’t be the last.

    Strategy ($MSTR), formerly MicroStrategy, is widely viewed as the next potential candidate. The company meets many of the S&P 500’s baseline criteria:

    • It is U.S.-based and publicly listed on the Nasdaq.

    • It has sufficient free float and market capitalization.

    • Its last four quarters of GAAP earnings are positive.

    And perhaps most notably: Strategy is the largest corporate Bitcoin holder in the world—by far.

    As of today, it holds 568,840 BTC, currently worth $59.16 billion.

    Its balance sheet is no longer just Bitcoin-heavy - it is Bitcoin-native. If admitted, Strategy would represent an even deeper exposure to Bitcoin inside the world’s most influential index.

    This matters. Because it signals that Bitcoin is becoming a foundational component of corporate capital formation—not an outlier.

    From Signal to Strategy: A New Corporate Playbook

    Coinbase’s entry - and Strategy’s potential follow-on - reinforces an emerging thesis: a Bitcoin treasury can enhance a company’s capital profile—not detract from it.

    Here’s why:

    • Visibility: Index inclusion provides perpetual exposure to new capital.

    • Flows: Passive funds are forced buyers—providing liquidity and price support.

    • Perception: Bitcoin is no longer a reputational liability—it’s becoming a marker of long-term vision and resilience.

    In this context, treasury strategy becomes a capital markets strategy. Holding Bitcoin isn’t just about hedging inflation or diversifying reserves—it’s about aligning your company with where capital is flowing.

    BFC Perspective: The Bridge Has Been Crossed

    From a Bitcoin For Corporations standpoint, this is not just news—it’s a case study in what institutional acceptance looks like.

    Coinbase has:

    • Navigated the public markets as a Bitcoin-native company,

    • Maintained a material Bitcoin treasury position, and

    • Demonstrated that such positioning is not a barrier to index inclusion—it can be a feature.

    And Strategy, with its commanding treasury and growing influence, may soon follow—cementing Bitcoin’s place at the core of U.S. corporate indices.

    This should embolden public companies and pre-IPO candidates alike. It’s proof that Bitcoin alignment doesn’t isolate you from the traditional system—it can embed you deeper into it.

    This is the BFC thesis in action: Bitcoin-native capital structures are compatible with institutional legitimacy.

    What Comes Next: Bitcoin Is Entering the Core Portfolio

    With Coinbase’s S&P 500 inclusion and Strategy potentially next, the implications are clear:

    • Bitcoin is no longer confined to speculative portfolios.

    • Bitcoin treasuries are now appearing in default asset allocations.

    • The passive indexing era is now passively onboarding Bitcoin—whether the end investor realizes it or not.

    For CFOs and capital allocators, the takeaway is simple: Bitcoin on the balance sheet is no longer a bet - it’s a bridge. To the index. To the allocators. To the long game.

    With Coinbase joining the S&P 500, Bitcoin exposure is entering the core of institutional portfolios—not through a financial product, but via a public company’s balance sheet. As Strategy positions to follow, this marks a broader shift: Bitcoin treasury strategy is becoming part of the mainstream capital structure.

    Tyler Durden Tue, 05/13/2025 - 15:52
  9. Site: Fr. Z's Blog
    1 week 4 days ago
    Author: frz@wdtprs.com (Fr. John Zuhlsdorf)
    Sunrise in Rome was at 5:50 and sunset will be at 20:24. The Ave Maria is in the 20:45 cycle. It is the traditional Feast of St. Robert Bellarmine and the Feast of the Dedication of Santa Maris “ad Martyres” … Read More →
  10. Site: LifeNews
    1 week 4 days ago
    Author: Right to Life UK

    Liam McArthur’s assisted suicide Bill is in doubt, after the Bill passed Stage One by only 14 votes.This means only seven MSPs need to change their vote for Bill to fall at the final (Stage Three) vote.

    The Bill was widely predicted to comfortably pass Stage One, so the result will come as a major shock to assisted suicide campaigners supportive of the Bill.

    Ahead of and during the debate, several MSPs made it clear that they were only voting in favour at Stage One to continue the debate around the Bill, and would only vote for the Bill at Stage Three on condition that there are significant improvements to the Bill before it comes back for its final vote in the Scottish Parliament.

    This means that the McArthur assisted suicide Bill could well have insufficient numbers to pass the final Stage Three vote.

    Last year, the Leadbeater Bill in Westminster passed by 55 votes, a much larger margin, proportionally, than on the McArthur Bill this evening, but following Committee Stage scrutiny, there are growing doubts that it will pass the final vote in the Commons, even after its margin of 55 at the first vote at Westminster.

    A large number of MSPs from across the political spectrum came together to give powerful speeches against the Bill during the debate today. They made it clear that this dangerous and extreme change to Scottish law would put the vulnerable at risk and see the ending of many lives through assisted suicide.

    Although the Bill has passed Stage One, the vote was far closer than supporters predicted, and the Bill still has a long way to go. MSPs on the Health, Social Care and Sport Committee will be able to debate and approve amendments to the Bill at Stage Two before the amended Bill is voted upon once more by all MSPs at Stage Three.

    Campaigners have vowed to redouble efforts to ensure that the Bill is defeated and will have many opportunities to persuade MSPs to abandon this dangerous legislation.

    Serious concerns remain about how this legislation would operate in practice, and the strong response from MSPs across all parties shows these issues won’t simply disappear.

    Significant concerns remain around the definition of “terminal illness” as defined in the Bill – “advanced and progressive disease, illness or condition from which they are unable to recover and that can reasonably be expected to cause their premature death”.

    Under the Bill, anyone with a terminal condition that could foreseeably end their lives, even many decades in the future, would qualify for an assisted death, including those with conditions such as anorexia, Down’s syndrome, and people with disabilities.

    New Scottish polling shows that only 8% of Scots view assisted dying as a priority for Holyrood. In fact, it came bottom of 20 possible priority areas for MSPs the public were asked about. The NHS and social care, where real end-of-life care happens, are the first and third priorities.

    In addition, a poll of 1,088 adults conducted by Whitestone Insight found that 61% of Scots are concerned that victims of domestic abuse “would feel pressured into ending their lives if assisted suicide were to be legalised” in Scotland. Concern was greatest among pensioners, with 83% of those over 75 saying that they were worried about domestic abuse victims being pressured into ending their own lives if assisted suicide is made legal.

    Spokesperson for Right To Life UK, Catherine Robinson, said:

    “The Bill was widely predicted to comfortably pass Stage One, so the result will come as a major shock to assisted suicide campaigners supportive of the Bill”.

    “Ahead of and during the debate, several MSPs made it clear that they were only voting in favour at Stage One to continue the debate around the Bill, and would only vote for the Bill at Stage Three on condition that there are significant improvements to the Bill before it comes back for its final vote in the Scottish Parliament”.

    “This means that the McArthur assisted suicide Bill could well have insufficient numbers to pass the final Stage Three vote”.

    “Last year, the Leadbeater Bill in Westminster passed by 55 votes, a much larger margin, proportionally, than on the McArthur Bill this evening, but following Committee Stage scrutiny, there are growing doubts that it will pass the final vote in the Commons, even after its margin of 55 at the first vote at Westminster.”

    “This is just the first stage of a long journey through the Scottish Parliament for this dangerous assisted suicide Bill. We are now going to redouble our efforts to ensure we fight this Bill at every stage and ensure that it is defeated to protect the most vulnerable”.

    “A very large number of MSPs spoke out against this extreme proposal in Holyrood today. They made it clear that this dangerous and extreme change to our laws would put the vulnerable at risk and see the ending of many lives through assisted suicide”.

    “Serious concerns remain about how this legislation would operate in practice, and the strong response from MSPs across all parties shows these issues won’t simply disappear”.

    “This Bill can and must be defeated. It still has a long way to go and presents an acute threat to vulnerable people, especially in the context of an overstretched healthcare system”.

    The post Scotland Bill Legalizing Assisted Suicide Will Die if 7 Members Change Their Votes appeared first on LifeNews.com.

  11. Site: southern orders
    1 week 4 days ago






    I just discovered that the last public Mass presided over by Pope Francis was the Jubilee Year Mass for the Armed Forces, Police and Security Personnel on February 9, 2025. The main celebrant, though, and hold on, was Pope Leo XIV, aka, Robert Cardinal Prevost.

    I had a clairvoyant experience when I watched that Mass. It was cold outside at St. Peter’s Square and a bit windy. I thought to myself that the pope did not look well. I wondered if he had a death wish being out there in the cold. 

    The next day, Pope Francis was admitted to the hospital and thus continued his journey to death and new life. 

  12. Site: OnePeterFive
    1 week 4 days ago
    Author: T. S. Flanders

    Dear OnePeterFive Donors, Supporters and readers, Christ is risen! The heart and soul of our organisation is the Crusade of Eucharistic Reparation. After the whirlwind of conclave news, we are only a few weeks away from June, the month of the Sacred Heart. This is a particularly important month for our editorial stance, which is “unite the clan to rebuild Christendom.” The heart and soul…

    Source

  13. Site: LifeNews
    1 week 4 days ago
    Author: Liam Harrell

    On Friday, in a packed courtroom filled with family, supporters, and fellow pro-life sidewalk counselors, justice prevailed.

    Zachary Knotts – joined by his wife, Lindsay – stood ready to defend himself against what had clearly become a politically motivated prosecution. After months of preparation and with unwavering resolve, the Knotts and their ACLJ legal team were fully prepared to face and defeat the charges stemming from a peaceful pro-life protest outside an abortion clinic in Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio.

    Instead, the government blinked.

    As the trial began, prosecutors abruptly tried to change their theory of the case – an 11th-hour maneuver that amounted to rewriting the charges on the spot. We immediately objected to the bait-and-switch. The prosecution then tried to have the trial rescheduled for a later date. We held firm. Enough was enough. Zack had waited too long to have his day in court, and we weren’t going to allow the government to continue delaying this matter, which amounted to little more than a trumped-up noise ordinance violation. Our client had a right to a speedy trial to clear his name, and justice couldn’t wait another day.

    HELP LIFENEWS SAVE BABIES FROM ABORTION! Please help LifeNews.com with a donation!

    In the end, with a packed courtroom watching, the prosecution folded. They dismissed the charges entirely. But let’s be clear: This prosecution should never have been brought in the first place.

    A Pattern of Harassment and Weaponized Law Enforcement

    The facts are straightforward. On the morning of December 28, 2024, Zack and Lindsay Knotts stood peacefully on a public sidewalk outside the Northeast Ohio Women’s Center (NEOWC) abortion clinic to express their constitutionally protected, pro-life views. Like many sidewalk counselors across the country, they brought a megaphone, which the Supreme Court has called “indispensable instruments of effective political speech” in the modern era. The Knotts began peacefully speaking out against abortion and advocating for the lives of preborn children.

    They were met by abortion clinic escorts using umbrellas, whistles, and kazoos to harass and drown out their message. These same escorts escalated their behavior, yelling threats like “Kiss a shotgun” and worse. After learning that Lindsay’s life was saved after her mother had considered an abortion, and she “should be dead,” an abortion escort snapped back: “We can fix that.”

    Despite the vile and dangerous threats directed at the Knotts, the loud instruments, and the shouting, it was the Knotts who were targeted by the authorities. The Cuyahoga Falls Police Department, which had been present and witnessed much of the interaction, later responded to a supposed complaint – after Zack’s megaphone had already run out of batteries. Officers took a statement from only one person: a fellow CFPD officer moonlighting as private security for the abortion clinic. They ignored other witnesses, disregarded the Knotts’ video evidence, and failed to corroborate any claim against Zack.

    Even more troubling, Sgt. Dobney – the lead officer – admitted he never personally witnessed Zack use the megaphone and that he’d relied on alleged “recordings” never shown to Zack or his counsel. That’s not right; government officials are prohibited from retaliation because of the exercise of protected speech. The facts made it clear: That’s exactly what happened.

    Zack and Lindsay never left the public sidewalk. They never blocked access to the abortion clinic. They never threatened anyone. The same cannot be said for those who tried to silence them. What happened here wasn’t just a mistake – it was a warning shot to pro-lifers everywhere: Speak out, and we’ll come for you. But today’s dismissal shows what can happen when you refuse to back down.

    This Isn’t Over: What You Can Do Now

    We’re grateful that this bogus prosecution is finally behind the Knotts family. But the injustice they endured – months of uncertainty, possible fines, and stress for simply exercising their First Amendment rights – demands accountability.

    We’re currently evaluating all available legal remedies, including filing a federal civil rights lawsuit. What happened to the Knotts wasn’t right, and that’s why we’re asking for your support to continue this battle in the federal courts. Government officials and law enforcement must be held accountable when they abuse their authority to punish protected speech.

    The ACLJ will never stop fighting for the rights of pro-life Americans to speak the truth about abortion and defend the unborn – on sidewalks, in courts, and across the country.

    LifeNews Note: Liam R. Harrell is Associate Counsel at the American Center for Law & Justice (ACLJ) Washington, D.C., office.

    The post Bogus Charges Dropped Against Pro-Life Father Who Protested at Abortion Clinic appeared first on LifeNews.com.

  14. Site: The Orthosphere
    1 week 4 days ago
    Author: JMSmith

    “So I inquisitive, and young and vain, 
    Willingly listened even at the Church
    When Doubt began to catechize me thus:
    ‘How know ye this is true?””

    W. R. Thayer, “The Confessions of Hermes” (1884)

    In a recent post Bonald suggests that the “primary job” of the new Pope is to “assist” parents, parochial staff and apologists in their struggle, presently failing, to stanch the bleeding wound of apostasy.  As the father of children who are, I believe, approaching those perilous years when the siren song of the world is most enchanting, Bonald is particularly anxious that the Pope do nothing to open that wound, or to amplify or sweeten that siren song.  As Bonald puts it,

    “He should think about people like me who are trying to keep teenage children in the faith, and he should ask himself whether what he’s about to do will make our job easier or harder.”

    Now everyone here knows that Bonald is exceptionally knowledgeable, articulate and devout.  This is not flattery but simple statement of fact.  He is also a professional educator who has spent years explaining abstruse notions to relative dunces, so he knows a thing or two about the art of elucidation.  The only thing Pope Leo can do to make Bonald’s job of effectively catechizing his children easier is therefore to do nothing that will make it harder.

    And even for a man as gifted as Bonald, effectively catechizing his children is hard.  The siren song of the world has never been louder or sweeter.  And never has an anxiously devout parent been so entirely left to his own devices.

    Let me digress for a moment to remark that our world swarms with experts who sell advice that is of no use at all.  When my own children were passing through those siren-song years, an expert advised me to “establish clear boundaries.”  Yet, as every parent knows, the means to enforce clearly established boundaries is what a parent wants.  A means of enforcement, that is, that will not permanently alienate the child or attract the attention of Child Protective Services.

    If you today ask an expert how to minimize the likelihood of apostasy in your children, you will almost certainly be told something that reduces to the suggestion that you take care they do not apostatize.  This is akin to the advice of those experts who tell you the key to happiness is not to be sad (and who for this useless advice will charge you one hundred dollars an hour).

    In my comment on Bonald’s post, I said I was surprised that the Roman Catholic Church seemed to take teenage apostasy so much less seriously than the secular authorities take teenage pregnancy or teenage venereal disease.  I know I was never given a helpful pamphlet filled with best practices and “evidence based” results.  I was instead given the pious platitudes of the failing status quo, and was therefore left entirely to my own devices.

    Bonald hopes Pope Leo will not make it harder for parents to keep their teenage children in the Church.  Now one obvious way he (Leo) could do this is to make the Church into a thing in which teenage children will not find it so irksome, embarrassing, and/or tedious to be kept.  I should say continue making the Church into such a thing because the suits in the C-suite have been making the Roman Catholic Church into such a thing for a very long time.  Their idea is that teenage children will find being kept in the Church less irksome, embarrassing, and/or tedious the more being “Catholic” means being, of all people, the most unctuously concerned with worldly concerns like social justice, climate change, and human rights.

    (This was, in fact, the tone of the textbook I was given in my brief and long-ago stint as a teacher of religious education.  It resembled a sixth-grade social studies textbook apart from the brief and incongruous hagiographies that were here and there interleaved.)

    Such syncretism may make it easier for parents to keep their teenage children in the Church, but it is not clear that such syncretism will make it easier for parents to keep their teenage children in the Faith. And the more the Faith of the Church becomes faith in social justice, climate change, and human rights, I daresay the harder it will be to keep teenage children in the Church.  Many may find a maudlin homily on the sad travails of miserable migrants easy to swallow, but very few will find it so tasty as the same dish served up elsewhere.

  15. Site: AsiaNews.it
    1 week 4 days ago
    The young daughter of a mix couple is among the victims of the Easter 2019 bombings. The Archdiocese of Colombo included her name in the list of martyrs of the 21st century sent to the Jubilee Committee. She was preparing for her baptism when she was killed in the church blast. She was buried in an Islamic cemetery. Her mother told AsiaNews that she invited others to pray, but 'God took her'.
  16. Site: Catholic Conclave
    1 week 4 days ago
      The new Head of the International Union of Superiors General, a Sister of Our Lady of Sion. I hope she remembers to dress properly when she meets the Pope, to give him the respect he is due. pic.twitter.com/TbAC3onmP0— Catholic Conclave (@cathconclave) May 13, 2025 Catholic Conclavehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06227218883606585321noreply@blogger.com0
  17. Site: Rorate Caeli
    1 week 4 days ago
    by Fr. Jay FinelliToday is the 108th Anniversary of the First Apparition of Our Lady of Fatima. Let us examine the prophetic link between Fatima, Pope Leo XIII, and Pope Leo XIV.On May 13, 1917, in a remote field in Cova da Iria, three shepherd children were visited by a radiant Lady from Heaven—Our Lady of the Rosary. That encounter would mark the beginning of one of the most important Father Kevin M Cusick http://www.blogger.com/profile/04460394747724581336noreply@blogger.com
  18. Site: Novus Motus Liturgicus
    1 week 4 days ago
    May 13th is now occupied by two different feasts on the general calendar, one in the Ordinary Form, and one in the Extraordinary Form. For most of the history of the Roman Rite, it was not occupied by any feast of general observance at all, but an interesting collection of local feasts and observances is kept on this date. St Robert Bellarmine, the second Jesuit to be made a cardinal, and one Gregory DiPippohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13295638279418781125noreply@blogger.com0
  19. Site: LifeNews
    1 week 4 days ago
    Author: Ben Johnson

    House Republicans seeking to end federal funding of abortion businesses received two enormous boosts to their efforts on Monday, as a legislative provision inched closer to adoption and Planned Parenthood released an annual report showing it received more taxpayer funding than any time in history. The report has pro-life experts telling The Washington Stand, “Planned Parenthood must be defunded.”

    Planned Parenthood committed 402,230 abortions and received $792.2 million in taxpayer funding in 2024, according to its 2024 annual reportreleased Monday. Last year, U.S. taxpayers became Planned Parenthood’s largest financial contributor, supplying 39% of the organization’s $2 billion in revenue — up from 34% in the last report.

    Get the latest pro-life news and information on X (Twitter). //

    “Planned Parenthood carries out over 1,100 abortions per day and receives over $2 million a day in taxpayer funding. This should absolutely disgust Americans. Our hard-earned dollars should not be going towards the slaughter of innocent unborn children. The federal government must end this horrific use of funds,” Mary Szoch, director of the Center for Human Dignity at Family Research Council, told The Washington Stand. “It’s past time for Congress to say, ‘American taxpayers will not be forced to pad the wallets of Planned Parenthood executives while women receive shoddy treatment in unsanitary conditions and their unborn children are killed.’”

    “Planned Parenthood must be defunded,” Szoch remarked.

    Planned Parenthood had net revenue of $2 billion and ended the year with total net assets of $2.52 billion. More than a dozen Planned Parenthood executives make more money than Anthony Fauci. Yet financial data remain murky, co-mingling multiple years and not including all affiliates.

    The report indicates a massive increase in both abortions and taxation extraction since last year. Planned Parenthood committed 392,712 abortions and received a $699.3 million in 2023. Taxpayers were “forced to give them a 13% increase in funding while most of America received only a 3 to 5% increase,” SFLAction President Kristan Hawkins told TWS via email. The abortion business carried out 374,155 abortions and received $670.4 million in taxpayer funding during its 2021-2022 fiscal year — itself an increase of 9,252 abortions over pre-Dobbs levels.

    “Leave it to Planned Parenthood to reveal their billions of dollars in abortion income on the heels of Mother’s Day weekend,” observed American Life League (ALL) Director Katie Brown Xavios. Planned Parenthood’s actions “included 402,230 abortions, sex education for young children, cross sex hormone distribution, and of course, the distribution of the deadly abortion pill.” ALL noted the report did not specify the number of abortions carried out by telehealth medication abortion.

    Planned Parenthood increased its promotion of transgender procedures, primarily cross-sex hormone injections, introducing “Virtual Health Centers” at 23 Planned Parenthood affiliates. But as it did last year, Planned Parenthood lumped in the number of “transgender services” with “other procedures,” which fell dramatically to 77,858 from 177,237 in the 2023 report.

    At least one Planned Parenthood affiliate has begun advertising transgender surgeries. “Planned Parenthood also offers some gender affirming surgeries to patients in the St. Louis area and refers to other providers when needed,” proclaims Planned Parenthood Great Rivers (PPGR) in Missouri.

    “For yet another year, pregnant women seeking help at Planned Parenthood are sold an abortion 97% of the time, while prenatal services, miscarriage care and adoption referrals make up a minuscule minority of the options they offer. Meanwhile their priorities include their assault on parental rightstransgender ‘treatments’ and political spending to defeat Republicans,” Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America told TWS. “This report heightens the urgency to defund Big Abortion and stop forcing taxpayers to fund an industry that destroys unborn lives and preys on women and girls.”

    Planned Parenthood employs 90 “patient navigators” whose actions “potentially break laws in pro-life states,” noted SFLAction.

    Yet the “health care provider” reduced its health care services sharply since last year: Cancer screenings decreased 8.1%, pap tests fell 12.3%, and primary care visits declined by 13.7%, according to Michael New, a professor at The Catholic University of America.

    Planned Parenthood: Undergoing STI Testing Is a Time of ‘Hope’

    The nation’s largest abortion business styled its work as inspiring hope. “Every time a patient walks through the doors of a Planned Parenthood health center, it is an act of hope,” begins Planned Parenthood’s annual report. “Every time someone … goes with their partner for STI testing, they are filled with hope that the future they plan is possible.”

    The report boasts of its ties to partisan political figures in the Democratic Party, noting Democrat Kamala Harris became the first sitting vice president to visit an abortion business, choosing a Minnesota Planned Parenthood. It vows to continue its activism “to educate people about sexual and reproductive health and rights” — a concept Planned Parenthood believes endows all American minors and illegal immigrants with the right to taxpayer-funded abortion-on-demand for any reason through all nine months of pregnancy, as well as transgender procedures.

    Planned Parenthood CEO Alexis McGill Johnson also vowed Planned Parenthood will continue to promote “abortion care” to “communities of color, low-income communities, those without documentation.” Her promise would cheer Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, a eugenicist who once attended a Ku Klux Klan rally. “That’s who Planned Parenthood is and who we’ll continue to be,” promised Johnson.

    House Committee Moves to Defund Planned Parenthood

    The report came as the House Energy and Commerce (E&C) Committee, chaired by Rep. Brett Guthrie (R-Ky.), approved language to end federal funding to any entity that carries out abortions. On Monday, 183 legislators from almost every state urged Congress to defund Planned Parenthood.

    “We commend our House Republican allies for working hard on a budget reconciliation process that finally gets taxpayers out of the abortion business and we encourage them to persevere,” Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America told TWS. “Now more than ever, we can hardly wait to see the ‘one big beautiful bill’ advance in Congress.”

    Yet defunding efforts are reportedly opposed by Republican Reps. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Penn.), Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.), and Jen Kiggans (R-Va.).

    “Demanding that Americans prop up an organization that sells wrong-sex hormone treatments, that sterilizes minors, and that ends precious lives in the womb violates the consciences of many Americans,” Hawkins told TWS. “Planned Parenthood is a case study in how access to power equals wealth, and for those in the GOP who are inclined to support them, remember at election time they are coming for you!”

    Until the bill passes, pro-life advocates vowed to fight on. “The fight isn’t over,” said an email sent Monday night by FRC Action, urging recipients to take action. “In fact, it’s really just begun.”

    “As Congress looks to cut waste, fraud, and abuse, it’s high time that we end taxpayer funding of gender transition procedures and abortion providers,” says the FRC Action letter.

    LifeNews Note: Ben Johnson is senior reporter and editor at The Washington Stand.

    The post Planned Parenthood Kills 1,100 Babies Every Day. Defund It Now appeared first on LifeNews.com.

  20. Site: Mises Institute
    1 week 4 days ago
    Author: Wanjiru Njoya
    There are no “good wars,” rather, there are wars with varying degrees of destructiveness. The American War Between the States was especially destructive, and the scars have not fully healed 160 years after it ended.
  21. Site: RT - News
    1 week 4 days ago
    Author: RT

    A prominent Jewish restaurant in Berlin chose to celebrate Israel Day with a joke about the slaughter of Palestinians

    A single, small, low-quality do-it-yourself poster recently displayed in the center of Germany’s capital Berlin has caused a minor scandal that has gone against the grain of the country’s usually unshakable support for Israel while the latter is committing genocide.

    The essence of the incident is simple: in late April, the Deutsch-Israelische Gesellschaft (DIG) – “German-Israeli Society” – held one of its “Israel Days” in Berlin. In Germany, the DIG is a prominent and powerful organization. Its main source of funding, according to the country’s official lobbying register for 2023, is the German state. The latter’s Federal Agency for Civic Education – in essence, Germany’s office of Centrist ideological orthodoxy and indoctrination – describes it as the country’s central organization […] where friends of Israel come together in non-partisan cooperation.”   

    “Israel Day” in Berlin was a largely informal event, really a street party with speeches. To make things even more fun, there was catering by the restaurant Feinberg’s. In particular, Feinberg’s, specializing in what it calls Israeli cuisine – Palestinians recognize many dishes as plagiarized from their tradition – offered a very special melon smoothie.

    The poster advertising the drink showed a lion (used by Israelis as a national symbol) wearing an apron emblazoned with the Israeli flag (just to make sure). The lion held two large glass tumblers, one with pieces of melon (an already traditional and well-known symbol of Palestine and its resistance), the other with the finished smoothie and a small Israeli flag.

    The background consisted of a pile of melons, often cut open, many featuring instantly recognizable baby faces. The poster’s text said (partly in English and partly in German): “Watermelon meets Zion. Israeli-style watermelon, shredded, mashed, and hacked to pieces.”

    An Israeli restaurant in Berlin offers “Israeli-style blended Watermelon, puréed, and chopped to pieces” at an Israel lobby event with faces on the watermelons. Many are interpreting this as a violent fantasy pic.twitter.com/AEHFPmZbBd

    — James Jackson (@derJamesJackson) April 27, 2025

    The watermelons evoked what is known as “Kindchenschema” or “cuteness” (in the scientific sense): an almost universally recognized pattern of features that signals babies and children and – with psychologically normal individuals – stirring deep hormonal and neurological responses of sympathy and care or at least restraint.

    The message was obvious and not at all funny: The Israeli “lion” was crushing the Palestinian “watermelons” into an enjoyably refreshing ice-cold and blood-red pulp, available with a “shot” of – presumably celebratory – vodka, too. That the faces on the anthropomorphized “melons” were childlike made everything even more repulsive: clearly, whoever felt this picture was a good idea is not normal enough for the Kindchenschema to work on them.

    Read more Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar. Israel issues warning over Palestine recognition

    Those who study genocide have long agreed that the deliberate dehumanizing of the victims by propaganda and indoctrination is one of its elementary methods and signs. Those who pretend to fail to recognize a textbook case of such dehumanization in this poster are deliberately obtuse.

    The poster was, of course, an unmistakable allusion to Israel’s ongoing combined genocide-ethnic cleansing operation, with its main (though not sole) target the Palestinians in the Gaza Strip. That is the place where the majority of Israel’s victims, many of them babies and children, have literally been “shredded” and “cut to pieces” by air raids and bombing as well as systematically starved and deprived of housing and vital infrastructure, especially medical institutions, and, not to forget, their caretakers: it is Gaza under Israeli assault for which doctors had to invent a new abbreviation: WCNSF – wounded child, no surviving family.

    In the words of Jonathan Whittall, head of the UN humanitarian office responsible for Gaza, Israel is practicing “deprivation by design” and the “deliberate dismantling of Palestinian life.”

    The latest - de facto minimum - death toll among the Palestinians is approaching 63,000. Almost 112,000 victims have been injured, often severely, leading to lifelong consequences, such as amputated limbs. Horrifying as they are, these figures, generated by Gaza’s health ministry – which, contrary to Israeli and Western propaganda, is conservative in its counting – are only the tip of the iceberg. For one thing, a study in the authoritative medical journal The Lancet has long maintained that the real figures are likely to be substantially higher.

    Read more A view damaged floating pier, set up by US to deliver humanitarian aid to Palestinians on May 27, 2024. © Dawoud Abo Alkas / Anadolu via Getty Images US aid mission in Gaza more disastrous than acknowledged – investigation

    Killing, injuring, and maiming are, of course, only one part of Israeli violence. Mass displacement and the literal razing of the Gaza Strip, much of which has been pounded into toxic dust, and deep and pervasive psychological trauma are others. There is no room here to even sketch all the vicious methods of Israel’s genocide or all its horrendous consequences. And as with genocides before, there is also a limit to language: It is hard to even accommodate in ordinary words both what the Israeli perpetrators have been doing, together with their Western accomplices, and the vicious sadism that not a few but many Israelis, in and out of uniform, are proudly displaying.

    Yet this is, after all, what Amnesty International – and many others – have rightly identified as a “live-streamed genocide.” Due to the stunning shamelessness of many Israeli perpetrators and the development of modern media and especially social media, this is a genocide in the global public eye as never before.

    That is why it is entirely impossible to believe the silly attempts to obfuscate and backpedal now made by the clearly anything but “leonine” creators of the poster. Obviously stung by protests and afraid of possible legal consequences, Yorai Feinberg, owner of Feinberg’s, has retreated to claiming that the melons were meant to stand for – drum roll – “antisemitism,” and that the whole thing was just satire anyhow.

    Both claims are offensively absurd: Everyone knows that watermelons stand for Palestine, Palestinians, and their resistance, not “antisemitism.” It may, of course, be that in the unwell minds of the poster’s creators those two things appear to be the same. That would be a classical Zionist delusion as well as a propaganda trick. And still, obviously, a lie.

    Read more American-Israeli hostage Edan Alexander reuniting his family after Palestinian resistance group Hamas released him US-Israeli hostage released by Hamas

    Also, it is very, very hard to explain why things now allegedly representing merely “antisemitism” needed to be drawn with cute, childlike faces. No, this is, let’s print it, for-crying-out-loud bullshit, nonsense of the same evil, brazen sort as the Israeli genociders’ endless, daft lies about Hamas here and Hamas there, whenever they feel – which is often – like bombing yet another hospital, tent encampment, or residential building.

    Regarding “satire”a cop-out publicly endorsed by (surprise, surprise) the DIG – where to even start? If the makers of this revolting picture really felt that they were producing something akin to a “witty” or “edgy” statement, a kind of “joke,” then that simply means that they find “joking” about genocide and especially the mass murder of children “normal.” And there can’t be anything less normal and more morally rotten than such a sense of “humor.” Seriously boasting of mass murder or “just kidding”? You know what: It does not matter – either means you are a monster.

    But this scandal involves more than the bloody bigotry of one German and Israeli restaurant. Consider that this was an official DIG event, attended by both its president Volker Beck and the Israeli ambassador to Germany Ron Prosor. They cannot have been unaware of the ‘lion-exterminates-melons’ poster: an Instagram picture showed both of them in front of the stand displaying it.

    Beck is a major – if past his prime – politician from Germany’s Green Party, a fanatical supporter of Israel, and, as it happens, also a figure with a less than shining past. He has argued for the decriminalization of “pedosexuality,” that is, de facto the unpunished sexual abuse of minors, a fact he later tried to conceal without success; he has also been caught with serious drugs. Prosor is a veteran Israeli diplomat who does what Israeli diplomats do: Past highlights include attacking UNRWA, a signature move of Israeli aggression against Palestinians designed to cut them off from any support that might disturb Israeli siege and starvation operations. Indeed, Israeli assaults on UNRWA are currently the subject of yet another case against it at the International Court of Justice  (ICJ).

    Read more RT ‘Israel cannot beat Hamas’: Afshin Rattansi challenges Jerusalem Center President Dr. Dan Diker

    Recently, Prosor has sought to suppress critical voices in Germany, including  Israeli philosopher Omri Boehm, and, for good measure, police German universities by defaming resistance to Israeli crimes and German complicity as “new antisemitism.” How original.

    It’s not hard to imagine that both gentlemen saw nothing wrong with that melon-shredding lion and may even have enjoyed a splash of genocide-’joke’ smoothie. And they won’t face any consequences, of course. For – and this is the widest and saddest context of this vile affair – Germany has chosen to side with Israel with a ‘to-the-bitter-end’ obstinacy reminiscent of that other very disappointing Germany that failed to ever stop being loyal to – and fighting for – Nazism until finally stopped by others, mostly the Soviets.

    Berlin, the capital, has been at the forefront of this new, as it were, transferred nationalism-without-restraint and Nibelungentreue for pure, obvious evil. Its mayor Kai Wegner has acquired a reputation for genocide denial; its police for brutality against those showing solidarity with Israel’s Palestinian victims. And it is the city where an anti-genocide protester has just been convicted for “trivializing the Holocaust” simply for peacefully holding up a sign saying “Have we learned nothing from the Holocaust?” Clearly, that judge has not.

    Against this background of pervasive, dominant ethical perversion, a poster viciously dehumanizing Palestinians came as no surprise. What is intriguing is that this time there has been some protest even, if all too faintly, in some mainstream media outlets. Maybe Germany is not entirely lost yet. Or is it, as before in German history, only a minority that shows decency but cannot change the deeply indecent course of the country’s morally and intellectually kaput elites and the majority still following them?

  22. Site: AsiaNews.it
    1 week 4 days ago
    Almost 70 million voters cast their ballot in midterm elections for Congress and local government. The outgoing majority in Congress should consolidate its hold. Local elections are a mixed bag with differences and divisions, with local coalition building the name of the game.
  23. Site: Zero Hedge
    1 week 4 days ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    "A Complete Surrender" - Germany Stops Spying On AfD Party After US Pressure

    Via Remix News,

    Germany’s domestic spy agency has suspended authoritarian surveillance methods of the anti-immigration Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, and U.S. pressure may have played a role.

    The German Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV), the country’s powerful domestic spy agency, had labeled the AfD a “confirmed far-right organization” before suspending this designation last week. The main reason presented was that the AfD is appealing the designation in court and the agency would wait until this appeal is concluded to decide whether to keep the designation.

    However, Germany’s ally, the United States, immediately criticized the designation in some of the harshest language possible, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio calling it “tyranny in disguise.” That was not all, though. U.S. Senator Tom Cotton, chairman of the powerful U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee, then asked Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard (DNI) to suspend intelligence cooperation between the United States and Germany.

    According to Cotton, the German authorities’ politically motivated surveillance activities resemble methods used by dictatorships that are unbecoming of a democratic ally.

    “Rather than trying to undermine the AfD using the tools of authoritarian states, Germany’s incoming government might be better advised to consider why the AfD continues to gain electoral ground,” he wrote.

    I asked @DNIGabbard to ensure that no American intelligence agencies cooperate with German authorities involved in surveiling domestic political opponents.

    These police state tactics are more suited for Russia or Communist China, not Western Europe’s largest country.…

    — Tom Cotton (@SenTomCotton) May 7, 2025

    This would have represented a drastic break between the two allies and even a threat to Germany’s national security, which raised the stakes in Germany’s authoritarian move to stifle the political opposition. Currently, the AfD is the largest opposition party in the country and for the first time ever, polled in first place last month.

    The developments have also caused a major stir in Germany. Alice Weidel, co-chair of the AfD, said American pressure was behind the BfV’s withdrawal of its designation label on the AfD. In addition, Joachim Steinhöfel, a lawyer defending freedom of speech, told NIUS that the move by the BfV is “a complete surrender by the German domestic intelligence service.” He also noted that U.S. influence was vital.

    “We also have to thank the Americans for exerting massive pressure,” he added.

    Germany often relies on external partners to spy on its own citizens, as Germany features very strict privacy laws. The NSA is thought to be especially active watching Germans. As a result, any U.S. withdrawal from intelligence sharing could have been disastrous for Germany.

    The temporary removal of the designation was warmly welcomed by the AfD, as it gives the party breathing room. For one, a vote on the ban of the party has little chance of moving forward without the designation. Second, the designation offered the BfV the legal means to surveil the entire party and its membership without a warrant, including reading emails and chats, as well as flood the party with informants.

    "I think it's really too late for a ban. The AfD is already too strong."

    Despite ongoing fears of an AfD ban, @Dieter_Stein, the EIC of the influential @Junge_Freiheit, says it would be "ludicrous."

    In fact, he predicts an end to the firewall against the AfD within 1-2 years. pic.twitter.com/We7hIQZrjS

    — Remix News & Views (@RMXnews) March 3, 2025

    Now, German intelligence is being forced to rethink its surveillance policy as political divisions grow. However, if the appeal court agrees with the BfV that the AfD can be labeled right-wing extremist, the same issue may rear its head again. It is unclear how long this appeals process will take, whether months or even years; however, there is a growing chorus from Germany’s left, as well as the Christian Democratic Union (CDU), to ban the entire AfD party.

    If that happens, tensions between the U.S. and Germany could soar to new heights.

    Read more here...

    Tyler Durden Tue, 05/13/2025 - 12:45
  24. Site: LifeNews
    1 week 4 days ago
    Author: Jordan Sekulow

    President Trump’s U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) reached out to the ACLJ after learning from our article about how a hospital was forcing medical professionals to participate in abortions, and now HHS has just launched a federal investigation of the hospital.

    The ACLJ is pleased to report a critical development in the ongoing fight to protect the rights of pro-life medical professionals. After we took action on behalf of five ultrasound technicians in New Mexico who were concerned that they would soon be compelled to participate in abortion procedures despite their deeply held religious beliefs, the federal government has now launched a formal investigation into the hospital’s conduct.

    This move by HHS marks a major step forward in ensuring that the conscience rights of healthcare workers are respected under the law.

    Get the latest pro-life news and information on X (Twitter). //

    As we previously shared, Presbyterian Hospital in Albuquerque changed its policies in late 2024 to require participation in abortion procedures – even for longtime employees with religious objections. When these five ultrasound technicians expressed their concern about the hospital’s new direction, they were told that refusing to comply could lead to reassignment or even termination.

    That’s when the ACLJ stepped in. We sent a demand letter outlining the hospital’s obligations under federal law – including Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and the Church Amendments – which prohibit employers from discriminating against employees who object to participating in abortions on religious grounds.

    Soon after, the hospital reversed course and granted religious accommodations to each of our clients.

    But that’s not where the story ends.

    As a follow-up to our legal action, President Trump’s HHS Office for Civil Rights just announced that it is initiating a compliance review into the hospital’s actions and its adherence to federal conscience protection laws.

    This kind of enforcement action is both rare and significant. It sends a powerful message to healthcare institutions across the country: You cannot force medical professionals to choose between their careers and their faith.

    We commend the Trump Administration for taking this issue seriously and moving to protect religious liberty in the healthcare context. This review reinforces what we’ve long argued – that federal law means what it says when it promises protection for those who refuse to take part in the destruction of human life.

    The Biden Administration rolled back conscience protections in 2022, leaving religious medical workers vulnerable. But this action by HHS shows that federal agencies still have a role to play in enforcing the law when religious medical professionals are targeted for their beliefs.

    It also demonstrates the power of strategic legal advocacy. Without our intervention, these five workers may have had to choose between their jobs and following their religious convictions. Because we acted – and because the law is on their side – they kept their positions and their integrity. But not only that – because these brave ultrasound technicians stood up and we defended them, the Trump Administration is now able to take the next step to ensure this kind of thing never happens again. The Trump Administration’s action is only possible because our clients were willing to work with us to take a stand.

    The ACLJ will continue defending the rights of pro-life professionals around the country. If you or someone you know is being pressured to participate in abortions or any procedure that violates their faith, we are here to help.

    This is a victory not just for five brave ultrasound techs in New Mexico – but also for every person who believes that no American should be forced to violate their conscience to keep their job.

    LifeNews Note: Jordan Sekulow is the Executive Director of the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ).

    The post Trump Launches Investigation After Presbyterian Hospital Forces Staff to Do Abortions appeared first on LifeNews.com.

  25. Site: Euthanasia Prevention Coalition
    1 week 5 days ago

    This article was published by National Review on May 13, 2025.

    By Wesley J Smith

    New York is close to passing a bill to legalize assisted suicide. Having passed the assembly, it is currently being considered in the senate.

    I read the bill, and much of it consists of the usual obfuscating definitions and pretenses seen in all such proposals. But a few of the provisions struck me as particularly mendacious. First, it defines prescribing poison as a “medical practice.” From S. 138:

    “Medical aid in dying” means the medical practice of a physician prescribing medication to a qualified individual that the individual may choose to self-administer to bring about death.

    Facilitating suicide is not, and never has been, “medical.” I could prescribe sufficient barbiturates to cause death by overdose. You could too. The only difference is the MD has the right to use the pad and lay people don’t.  Indeed, as the Estonian supreme court recently noted while (lamentably) creating a civil right to suicide for any reason, assisted suicide “intentionally causes harm” to the person who dies and “causing death cannot be considered the provision of a healthcare service.”

    The bill also engages in blatant language reengineering:

    § 2899-n. Relation to other laws and contracts. 1. (a) A patient who requests medication under this article shall not, because of that request, be considered to be a person who is suicidal, and self-administering medication under this article shall not be deemed to be suicide, for any purpose.

    But that is precisely what it is! Death by “medical aid in dying” isn’t natural. It is self killing, intentionally ending one’s own life, i.e. suicide.

    And this means that some suicidal people will not be offered suicide prevention — which all suicidal people deserve regardless of the reason for wanting to end it all — even if the actual suicidal ideation is caused by something other than the underlying illness.

    More:

    Action taken in accordance with this article shall not be construed for any purpose to constitute suicide, assisted suicide, attempted suicide, promoting a suicide attempt, euthanasia, mercy killing, or homicide under the law, including as an accomplice or accessory or otherwise.

    The law can redefine a dung beetle into a butterfly, but it still can’t fly and doesn’t consume nectar!

    Of course, the legislation requires falsifying vital statistics:

    § 2899-p. Death certificate. 1. If otherwise authorized by law, theattending physician may sign the qualified individual’s death certificate.

    Thee cause of death listed on a qualified individual’s death certificate who dies after self-administering medication under this article will be the underlying terminal illness or condition.

    But disease will not be the actual cause of death. And remember, sometimes people diagnosed with a terminal illness never die from that condition.

    Falsifying death certificates serves two purposes. First, it prevents transparency. Investigators will be unable to access the information they need to conduct independent studies. And second, pretending that some suicides are natural deaths distorts suicide statistics by making it appear as if fewer people killed themselves than actually did.

    Dr Lydia Dugdale
    I’ll close by recommending an excellent critique of the bill by the physician author of The Lost Art of Dying, published by the New York Times (of all places). From, “There Are Ways to Die With Dignity, but Not Like This,” by L. S. Dugdale:

    When it comes to conventional suicide, it’s no secret that people who suffer from depression are at greater risk. There is no reason to think that depression is any less of a factor when it comes to physician-assisted suicide. Yet the New York bill, which is modeled on the Death With Dignity law enacted in Oregon in 1997, does not even require a mental health professional to screen patients for depression unless one of the doctors involved determines that the patient’s judgment may be impaired by a psychiatric or psychological disorder.

    This is a major oversight that fails to protect depressed people from making flawed decisions. Depression is not just a mood; it distorts perception, often convincing people that their lives are worthless, their loved ones are better off without them and death is their only option.

    Indeed. And I know of several cases of terminally ill people backing away from the ledge when they received proper social interventions and were very glad to still be alive.

    Here is Dr. Dugdale’s powerful conclusion:

    This is not a compassionate policy — not in Canada, not in Oregon and not, should the bill become law, in New York. Instead of investing in the infrastructure of support for the lonely, the depressed, the disabled and the poor, we offer them a prescription for death. We call it autonomy, but it’s abandonment.

    The art of dying well cannot be severed from the art of living well, and that includes caring for one another, especially when it is hard, inconvenient or costly. It is not enough to offer the dying control. We must offer them dignity — not by affirming their despair but by affirming their worth. Even when they are suffering. Even when they are vulnerable. Even when they are, in worldly terms, a burden. [Emphasis added.]

    I urge you to read the whole piece. And I urge the New York State Senate to vote no on abandonment and yes on greater care. Assisted suicide is bad “medicine” and worse public policy.

  26. Site: RT - News
    1 week 5 days ago
    Author: RT

    The US president has also offered to personally attend the potential peace negotiations in Istanbul

    US President Donald Trump is reportedly planning to send his senior envoys Steve Witkoff and Keith Kellogg to Türkiye this week to attend the potential talks between Moscow and Kiev, Reuters reported on Tuesday, citing anonymous sources.

    The talks, which are expected to be held in Istanbul on Thursday, were originally proposed last week by Russian President Vladimir Putin, who offered to resume direct negotiations between Moscow and Kiev without any preconditions in order to reach a lasting settlement to the Ukraine conflict.

    Vladimir Zelensky has expressed his readiness to engage in dialogue with the Russian side, but has insisted that it be preceded by an unconditional 30-day ceasefire – a demand Moscow has repeatedly rejected. Zelensky has also said that he would only attend the meeting in Istanbul if Putin comes in person.

    Trump has also supported the proposal to renew talks between Moscow and Kiev. Speaking to reporters at the White House on Tuesday ahead of his Middle East tour, the US President stated that he might even personally attend the negotiations in Türkiye, especially if Putin decides to attend.

    Read more  White House special envoy Steve Witkoff meeting Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow, April 25, 2025. Not talking to Putin illogical – Trump envoy

    “I was thinking about actually flying over there. There’s a possibility of it, I guess, if I think things can happen,” Trump said. “Don’t underestimate Thursday in Turkey,” he added.

    Moscow has not commented on the possibility of Putin traveling to Istanbul. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov also has yet to confirm who would be representing Moscow during the talks, stating that the Russian president’s decision on the matter will be announced in due time.

    According to Reuters, regardless of whether Putin, Zelensky or Trump decide to take part in the talks, Kellogg and Witkoff have been ordered to go to Istanbul on Thursday to attend the meeting. The outlet noted that the two senior advisers will not actually take direct part in the negotiations and will only play the role of observers.

    While it’s still unclear if the talks will actually take place and in what form, Peskov has stated that preparations for Thursday’s negotiations are underway. He has also ruled out the possibility of any of Kiev’s Western European backers taking part in the process, arguing that they are “entirely on Ukraine’s side” and “rather pro-war,” which excludes them from being considered “unbiased.”

  27. Site: LifeNews
    1 week 5 days ago
    Author: Jerry Cox

    Planned Parenthood’s affiliates spent $3.4 million helping women travel for abortion last year, according to a new report from the organization.

    Planned Parenthood is the nation’s largest abortion provider. Nationwide, its facilities aborted more than 400,000 unborn children last year. Planned Parenthood’s annual report for 2024 brags that its affiliates spent $3.4 million helping more than 12,500 women travel for abortion under its “patient navigation program.”

    Planned Parenthood’s regional affiliate owns facilities in Little Rock and Rogers. However, Arkansas’ good, pro-life laws generally prevent those facilities from performing abortions.

    But last summer, Family Council learned Planned Parenthood had secretly acquired a facility in Pittsburg, Kansas — a small town within driving distance of Northwest Arkansas.

    LifeNews is on GETTR. Please follow us for the latest pro-life news

    The new location in Southeast Kansas opened in August. At the time, Family Council and others expressed concerns that the facility would make it easier for Planned Parenthood to promote abortions regionally to women in states that all have very strong, pro-life laws.

    Since then, news outlets have confirmed this new Planned Parenthood facility primarily performs abortions on women from Arkansas, Oklahoma, and Texas.

    Abortion hurts women, and it ends the lives of unborn children. Its risks and its consequences are deathly serious.

    Women and families deserve better than abortion. It’s important to prohibit abortion through legislation, but we need to work to eliminate the demand for abortion as well.

    One way Arkansans can do that is by supporting pro-life organizations that empower women with real options besides abortion.

    Arkansas is home to more than 60 organizations that assist pregnant women — including some 45 pregnancy resource centers that help women with unplanned pregnancies.

    The State of Arkansas recently voted to award $2 million in grants to pregnancy-help organizations for the 2025-2026 budget cycle.

    That money is going to help a lot of women and children in the coming months — and hopefully it will encourage women not to travel to Planned Parenthood facilities in other states for abortions.

    LifeNews Note: Jerry Cox is the president of the Arkansas Family Council.

    The post Planned Parenthood Spent Millions Taking Women and Teens to Other States to Kill Their Babies in Abortions appeared first on LifeNews.com.

  28. Site: RT - News
    1 week 5 days ago
    Author: RT

    The ex-Philippines president is currently facing trial at the International Criminal Court for crimes against humanity

    Former Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte has won a mayoral race in his home city, according to unofficial election results released on Tuesday. The apparent win comes even as he remains in custody at the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague, facing charges of crimes against humanity.

    Duterte, 80, was arrested by Philippine authorities at Manila’s international airport in March and flown to The Hague, where he is facing trial over his ‘war on drugs’ policy. Under Philippine law, candidates facing criminal charges may run for office unless convicted and all appeals have been exhausted.

    Preliminary results showed Duterte had secured more than half a million votes in Davao City – nearly eight times more than his nearest rival. He served as the city’s mayor for two decades before winning the presidency in 2016. Official results are expected within a week.

    “Duterte landslide in Davao!” his youngest daughter Veronica posted on Facebook.

    The “overwhelming” support Duterte received shows the public’s “total rejection” of efforts to “attempt to stamp out” his legacy, his lawyer said, as quoted by ABS-CBN news agency.

    Supporters reportedly chanted his name as early tallies were announced.

    Read more FILE PHOTO. Rodrigo Roa Duterte and Sebastian Duterte. Duterte’s son vows to ‘fight back’ against father’s ICC arrest

    The ICC alleges that from 2016 to 2022, Duterte oversaw “death squads” responsible for killing suspected drug dealers and users. He has denied wrongdoing but admitted the crackdown was violent.

    Government records show at least 6,200 people were killed in police operations. Rights groups say the real toll could be far higher.

    Some human rights advocates have called Duterte’s arrest illegal, noting the Philippines withdrew from the ICC in 2019 on his orders. The court argues it retains jurisdiction over crimes committed while the country was still a member.

    His lawyers have filed a petition accusing the Philippine government of “kidnapping” and say the extradition violated both domestic and international law.

    Vice President Sara Duterte, his eldest daughter, told reporters after voting this week that she was in talks with her father’s lawyers about how he might take his oath as mayor while in detention. She is widely seen as a leading contender for the 2028 presidential race, despite an impending Senate impeachment trial in July.

  29. Site: Euthanasia Prevention Coalition
    1 week 5 days ago
    Alex Schadenberg
    Executive Director, Euthanasia Prevention Coalition

    Eleanor Hayward reported for the Times that a poll by Whitestone Insight, a member of the British Polling Council, asked 103 out of 650 MP's how they planned to vote on the Kim Leadbeater assisted suicide bill at final reading.

    The bill returns to parliament, from committee, on May 16.

    The poll indicated that 42% of the MP's where planning to vote against the assisted suicide bill, 36% supported the bill, while the others were undecided or planning to abstain from the vote.

    The Leadbeater assisted suicide bill passed, on November 29, 2024, at second reading by a vote of 330 to 275. This new poll suggests that the vote has shifted.

    The Times reported that:
    Some MPs have turned against the bill as it has gone through the committee stage, during which the bill lost its requirement for a High Court judge to sign off each assisted dying application. Dozens of MPs are thought to have only backed the bill at its second reading because of this requirement.Gordon MacdonaldDr. Gordon Macdonald, the chief executive of Care Not Killing, told the Times that:
    “The more MPs hear about assisted suicide and what it entails, the less likely they are to support changing the law.

    “Clearly MPs recognise that removing the requirement for every application to be overseen by the High Court — part of a formal judicial process with the duty to consider all views and the power to summon witnesses — makes the bill much less safe, while the rejection of amendments aimed at protecting the most vulnerable people in our society is making many people think again.

    “This bill was sold to parliament and to members of the public as being the safest in the world, yet the truth is this bill if it became law would put the lives of vulnerable people at risk, exactly as we see in every jurisdiction that has legalised assisted suicide or euthanasia.”To gain back support for her assisted suicide bill, Kim Leadbeater recently urged MPs to back an amendment to the assisted dying bill which would commission a new assessment on the state of palliative care, a move first proposed by the bill’s opponents.

    Leadbeater doesn't need to amend the bill in order to commission an assessment on the state of palliative care, nonetheless, this is an attempt by her to convince more MP's to support her assisted suicide bill.
  30. Site: AsiaNews.it
    1 week 5 days ago
    The Election Commission has suspended the registration of former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina's party over allegations of crimes against humanity after her government cracked down on student protests last summer. The current head of government, Muhammad Yunus, has delayed the vote, while Jamaat-e-Islami and Khaleda Zia's Bangladesh National Party are putting pressure for an early poll.
  31. Site: Zero Hedge
    1 week 5 days ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    Trump Not Going To Istanbul, As Kremlin Downplays 'Direct' Ukraine Peace Talks

    The Kremlin on Tuesday affirmed that "the Russian side continues to prepare for the negotiations that are scheduled to take place on Thursday." This after on Sunday Russian President Vladimir Putin offered to resume direct negotiations with Kiev, and proposed the Istanbul talks.

    Ukrainian President Zelensky then made a performative gesture - likely more meant to prove to the White House that he's 'willing' - saying he's ready to fly to Istanbul in person and urged Putin to do the same.

    Putin spokesman Dimitry Peskov when grilled by reporters on Tuesday downplayed the whole event, describing that direct talks between Russia and Ukraine in Istanbul later this week are merely "still possible".

    As for revealing the line-up for the Russian delegation, and who is expected lead, Peskov said "we will announce it as soon as the president [Putin] deems it necessary."

    Despite some sensational recent headlines and statements, one thing we can be sure will not happen is President Putin's personal presence. And per the latest from Reuters, President Trump is not going to be there in Turkey either (after on Monday he actually floated the possibility):

    • KELLOGG, WITKOFF ARE HEADING TO ISTANBUL THIS WEEK: REUTERS
    • FORMAT OF TALKS IN TURKEY WITH KELLOGG, WITKOFF UNCLEAR: REUTERS

    "All of us in Ukraine would appreciate it if President Trump could be there with us at this meeting in Turkey. This is the right idea. We can change a lot," Zelensky had said.

    And Trump had responded by saying he was "thinking about actually flying over" – which would have to happen immediately on the heels of his big Gulf visit to Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and UAE.

    Zelensky has meanwhile insisted that any talks should be preceded by the start of a 30-day ceasefire – which Washington appears to be backing, but which the Kremlin has already rejected.

    Really, all the talk of pushing to get Putin in Istanbul to negotiate in person was about generating mainstream media headlines like the following:

    Moscow worries that such a lengthy pause in fighting would only be used by Ukrainian forces to rearm and regroup along the front lines, at a moment they are exhausted and steadily losing ground.

    Peskov told reporters further, "[Western] Europe is, after all, entirely on Ukraine’s side. It cannot claim to have an unbiased approach… Its approach is not balanced, it is rather pro-war, aimed at continuing the fighting, which is in sharp contrast to the approach demonstrated, for example, by Moscow or Washington," according to Russian media.

    Tyler Durden Tue, 05/13/2025 - 11:45
  32. Site: RT - News
    1 week 5 days ago
    Author: RT

    The decision includes potential delivery of Taurus cruise missiles, a government spokesman has said

    Germany wants to maintain a “low profile” on future arms deliveries to Ukraine and has refused to publicly discuss the potential delivery of Taurus cruise missiles to Kiev, according to a German government spokesperson on Monday.

    Extensive public debate of arms deliveries helps Russia, according to Stefan Cornelius, spokesman for new Chancellor Friedrich Merz. Previous deliveries to Kiev under Olaf Scholz were widely debated in public.

    “We will also no longer comment on any plans regarding the supply of Taurus cruise missiles,” Cornelius said, “Information about what weapons and ammunition we are supplying should remain open. The situation is different when it comes to such details as the number of specific missiles. This information is not so important for the public, but the Russian aggressor can draw conclusions from it.”

    Read more UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz onboard a train to Kiev on May 9, 2025. Western Europe’s efforts a ‘complete fiasco’ – Moscow

    The official silence could precipitate the long-debated delivery of the Swedish-German Taurus missiles to Ukraine, which Scholz opposed, citing escalation of the conflict, but which Merz is open to supplying.

    Taurus missiles have a 500km operational range, meaning they could be used to attack targets deep inside Russian territory. Moscow has repeatedly warned Berlin that deliveries to Ukraine would make Germany a direct participant in the conflict.

    “Since live-firing these cruise missiles is impossible without the direct assistance of Bundeswehr servicemen, a strike on any Russian facilities, critical transport infrastructure... all this will be regarded as direct German participation in military operations,” Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said last month.

  33. Site: Henrymakow.com
    1 week 5 days ago

    Are nuclear bombs a hoax?

    Makow Disclaimer - I reserve judgment

    by Patrick O'Carroll
    (henrymakow.com)

    At circa 53 minutes into this video, Scottish nuclear physicist Steven Young lists his TOP TEN NUCLEAR HOAXES (these being his favorite ten from a whole gamut of even more nuclear hoaxes).

     Steven notes, "They take you into the quantum world in order to bamboozle you". 

     1. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were non-atomic attacks that were "achieved" using a combo of Firebombs, Napalm, and Mustard Gas, as also shown by Dr Michael Palmer in his 2023 book "Hiroshima Revisited"

    There was no nuclear fallout at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and no uranium was used in the attacks. 

     2. Nuclear power is based on most likely HARMLESS radiant energy and certainly not "hazardous radioactive decay". In reality, harmless uranium heats water, causing steam from which electricity is generated. The only known "chain reaction" is when something burns. There is no such thing as a "nuclear chain reaction". 

     3. The "Atomic Age" is a hoax based on the Hiroshima and Nagasaki hoax (which was an ad for it). Part of this hoax was the "cold" war, and its bogus threat and artificial atomic "dilemma". "Team Antichrist" made 5 trillion USD dollars off the wholly-staged "cold" war, mostly by selling untested non-nuclear weapons like TRIDENT. 

     
    Worcester-Democrat-and-the-ledger-enterprise-Pokomoke-City-MD-1938-03-04-p-9-cropped.jpg
    4. The "Radium Girls" was a media hoax dated 1917-24 in which factory workers "suffered bodily disintegration" after close contact with radium they had been painting on the dials of watches and clocks. 

     5. "Cold Fusion" was a 1989 media hoax in which Fleischmann and Pons fused two nuclei together and got a flash. But it was really a flash-in-the-pan that was never reproduced. 

     6. "Hot Fusion" is a hoax about supposedly-imminent "over-unity power generation" that will never materialize and is hence another case of VAPORWARE (i.e. always promised or "on its way" but never actually arriving). 

     7. The Fukushima Hoax was a well-funded and calculated disinformation campaign (and this was often pointed out by James Corbett, who himself lives in Japan). 

     8. The Chernobyl Hoax yet was more disinformation. The reactor kept operating for 14 years after the 1986 disaster. There is no evidence of any nuclear fallout or radioactivity at Chernobyl, but there is some evidence of iodine poisoning. Today's residents of Chernobyl can explain the hysteria in greater detail. 

     9. Particle accelerators are a hoax that do not accelerate particles, but are instead just glorified "giant cathode ray tubes". There are no particles, i.e. this is just electricity. Particle accelerators are also very expensive, yet useless, machines. 

     10. The hoax claiming that stars are "nuclear reactors that manufacture matter in outer space", which is really a claim from the bizarre field of astrophysics, which is basically bogus nuclear theory applied to space, and happens to also be one of the most boring subjects in all of Freemasonic "Science". 



     The graphic (below) suggests that nuclear accidents may in fact be yet another technique (boondoggle) used to rob taxpayer money (the cost of Fukushima being 260 billion USD, and that of Chernobyl being 200 billion USD). 

     SOME HIGHLY SUSPICIOUS THINGS ABOUT ATOMIC PHYSICS 

     1. Nuclear physics is based on the bogus claim that "God Made A Mistake", i.e. that a "bug" in God's System meant that the entire world could be destroyed by "splitting" God's tiniest building-block. It is MUCH more likely that this is a satanic boast by Freemasonic "Science" that their "Prince" Satan "can destroy Creation". This is also akin to Freemasonic "Science" adopting "Big Bang" Theory as essentially "Satan's Own Creation Narrative", which is highly nihilistic since nihilism takes the view that everything happens because of nothing. In addition, Freemasonic "Science" deployed fake-"scientist" Oppenheimer (whose colleagues confirmed "he could not even run a hamburger stand") to make the terrifying (or terrorist) claim, "Now I Am Become Death, the Destroyer of Worlds", which is a line from the Bhagavad Gita, one of the four most-revered books in 33rd-Degree Freemasonry, the full list of four being: The (faulty or incorrectly-translated) KJV Bible; the Koran; the Bhagavad Gita along with the Four Vedas; and "The Book of the Law" by British Satanist Aleister Crowley. 

     2. The theory of "sub-particles" was "proved right the very first time". That is unlikely since the reality of human endeavor mostly involves "two steps forward, and one step back". Originally, atoms were indivisible building blocks (from the Greek "átomos" meaning undivided). Around 1850, fake-"scientists" still referred to atoms as being "like tiny little billiard balls". But then, fake-"scientists" started claiming that atoms could be broken down into "sub-particles". However, the fact that this "sub-particle" theory was then proved to be "true", "right", or "correct" immediately (the very first time and with no setbacks) is massively suspicious, especially since, to this day, no one has ever seen "particles" or "sub-particles" such as atoms, electrons, protons ... More oddly, Freemasonic "Science" claims that 99.99 percent of formerly-"full" atoms is now "empty space". 

     
    costs.jpg
    3. The "Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle" was invented as a SUPER-COVER-UP. Basically, this "principle" states: "No one can see any of our bogus, invented 'particles' or 'sub-particles' because shining any light on them would 'naturally' cause them to immediately vamoose, or depart, or disappear". 

     4. Similarly to the "Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle", Quantum Physics claims the very act of measurement will cause the "quantum-ness" to totally vanish. This implies that when you look away from Quantum Physics, it is "all quantum" but, when you look back at it, it is "obliged" to become real or to hastily re-comply with reality. 

     5. The concept of the "random universe" is false, nihilistic, and a cop-out because Freemasonic "Science" can not claim to be scientific if it keeps asserting that everything happens because of nothing. 

     6. Atomic Physics leads to SOLIPSISM (from Latin "solus" for alone and "ipse" for self), or the idea that only one's mind is sure to exist. Worse still, solipsism bolsters satanic concepts such as "there is no truth" or "truth is in the eye of the beholder", i.e. bogus ideas that were made fashionable by the "Enlightenment" (which may really be a satanic inversion for "En-Darken-ment"). Steven says there is no proof of "alpha particles" (helium nuclei), which unfortunately means that Ernest Rutherford's "discovery" of the nucleus is yet another HOAX. Also, in all of nuclear physics, there is still no evidence whatsoever of any "atom splitting" going on. 

     7. Freemasonic "Science" based its fake theory of the Cosmos on its fake theory of the atom.

    - to be continued..
  34. Site: RT - News
    1 week 5 days ago
    Author: RT

    It is “shameless” for the US president to threaten American ally Denmark, Anders Fogh Rasmussen has said

    US President Donald Trump should drop his plans to take control of Greenland as its residents do not want to become Americans, former NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen has said.

    Trump has been talking about making Greenland, an autonomous territory of the Kingdom of Denmark, part of the US, since winning a second term in the White House in November. He has offered to buy the resource-rich Arctic territory from Copenhagen, but also warned that he could go as far as using force to bring it under Washington’s sovereignty.

    “I do not say I am going to do it, but I do not rule out anything,” the US president said of a possible military scenario in an interview with NBC’s Meet the Press earlier this month. “We need Greenland very badly. Greenland is a very small amount of people [around 57,000], which we will take care of, and we will cherish them, and all of that. But we need that for international security,” he claimed.

    Read more US President Donald Trump during a press conference in the Roosevelt Room at the White House, Monday, May 12, 2025, in Washington. EU nastier than China – Trump

    Rasmussen, who previously served as Danish prime minister, told Politico on Monday that it is “shameless that an American president can threaten an ally. Denmark is one of the closest and most reliable allies of the US.”

    The former NATO boss, who oversaw the military bloc’s disastrous intervention in Libya, destroying the country’s economy, unleashing immigrant flows across North Africa and slave auctions in Tripoli, stressed that he is “concerned” by Trump’s rhetoric regarding Greenland.

    He noted that the US already has a right to keep military bases on the island as part of a 1951 treaty.

    “The fact is that Greenland is part of NATO. If the US is dissatisfied with the defense of Greenland... we would appreciate a strengthened defense cooperation with the US,” Rasmussen stressed.

    However, he insisted that Greenland “is part of Denmark and Greenlanders do not want to become Americans.”

    READ MORE: Western states want Ukraine conflict to continue – EU state’s leader

    Last week, the Danish Foreign Ministry summoned the acting US ambassador to the country, Jennifer Hall Godfrey, over a report in the Wall Street Journal that Trump had ordered US spy agencies to ramp up their intelligence-gathering efforts in Greenland. Danish Foreign Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen said the meeting was aimed at conveying to Washington that Copenhagen treats the claims “very seriously.”

    Greenland’s prime minister, Jens-Frederik Nielsen, described the alleged spying activities by the US as “completely unacceptable, disrespectful… and entirely abnormal.”

  35. Site: LifeNews
    1 week 5 days ago
    Author: Grace Porto

    A teenager just celebrated her first Mother’s Day during her third trimester of pregnancy, and thanked a local pregnancy resource center for encouraging her and her boyfriend to keep the baby.

    Emily was 17, a senior in high school, when she and her boyfriend Brian found out they were expecting a baby. They found Heartbeat of Miami online and decided to go in for an appointment.

    LifeNews is on GETTR. Please follow us for the latest pro-life news

    “When me and my boyfriend first came in, we were very scared, very nervous, didn’t know what to expect, and all I could think about was how I was going to tell my mom,” she said.

    Emily took another pregnancy test at the appointment which confirmed she was pregnant, and she was distressed.

    “Then after they brought me and my boyfriend to a room and I saw my baby on that ultrasound, and it was very emotional. Because, you know, it’s my baby. Me and my boyfriend made that baby,” she said, and she felt elated.

    She was nervous to tell her parents, but she said the staff at Heartbeat encouraged her and helped boost her confidence.

    Emily’s mother drove to the clinic herself after she found out about the pregnancy, and Emily said that the staff comforted her, her mother, and her boyfriend, who also arrived for the appointment.

    “They gave us a bunch of advice and support and made me feel great about having this baby,” she said.

    After that appointment, Emily said her mother became much more excited about the new baby.

    Emily recorded the video last week, when she was 39 weeks pregnant. She is planning on naming her son Jaden.

    “And I’m very thankful and grateful for Heartbeat of Miami and the staff here because they made this happen,” Emily said. “I would never have thought I would be here today if it weren’t for them, and I thank them so much for everything.”

    LifeNews Note: Grace Porto writes for CatholicVote, where this column originally appeared.

    The post Teen Mom Rejects Abortion as Pro-Life Pregnancy Center Helps Save Her Baby appeared first on LifeNews.com.

  36. Site: Zero Hedge
    1 week 5 days ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    The Merch-Can-'Til-Lists

    By Michael Every of Rabobank

    The Merch-Can-'Til-Lists

    Equity markets soared, as did bond yields and the US dollar, while gold and Bitcoin dropped following the US and China taking down their tariffs by 115 percentage points to 30% for the US (on top of legacy 25% Trump 1/Biden tariffs on 2/3rds of Chinese goods and 25% sectoral tariffs) and to 10% for China for 90 days.

    Some say President Trump folded, “because markets.” Or “because neo-mercantilism” as there is nothing market-like in China’s dominance of the production and the staggering trade surpluses it runs. Yet there’s certainly dotted lines being drawn on things to show where folds could go.

    On the other hand, markets soared despite tariffs that were unthinkable six months ago. Moreover, Trump claimed China has agreed to remove all non-tariff barriers -- like massive direct and indirect state subsidies and infrastructure -- and underlined that tariffs can go back up again, if not to 145%, if a deal isn’t done by 10 August.

    Yet trade partners just saw pushing back at the US can work: why rush to sign a deal like the UK’s --which aims to freeze China out of supply chains-- to then see the US say it doesn’t want to decouple from Beijing, or only in key sectors? That suggests the White House is going to have to breathe fire at someone to make their point. The candidate who fits that bill best might be the EU --if Japan, South Korea, or Canada don’t get there first-- and now the US will be forcing its prescription drug prices down by executive order, with parties like Europe facing higher prices as a result, there are even more issues to clash over. In short, the trade war isn’t over.

    At the meta level, we just published a report on neo-mercantilist ideology, which includes both China and Trumpism. Markets are caught between ‘Merch-can-‘til-Lists’, as China cementing itself into supply chains and de-risking from the West remains its grand macro strategy, and acting against it is the US equivalent. Indeed, markets cheering the victory of a non-market economy over a market-driven one, because the latter was mirroring the former, fail to see what’s happening.

    The Financial Times reports US Treasury Secretary Bessent secretly met China’s Finance Minister Lan Fo’an in a basement after the IMF meeting three weeks ago: recall laughter at the US claiming to have made contact with China? Apologise if you were one of them.

    Chinese Delegation Spotted Entering Treasury Department, Demands Photos Be Deleted: Report https://t.co/CRh07l2K1Z

    — zerohedge (@zerohedge) April 25, 2025

    Oren Cass, also in the FT, underlines liberal neo-mercantilists think the US needs tariffs to push back against state-backed champions supported by illiberal neo-mercantilists: “Perhaps the free-traders are betting on the latter, and would abandon American-style capitalism altogether before allowing so blasphemous a word as “protection” to pass their lips. What they cannot have, in the modern world, no matter how ideal in theory, is free trade and a free market at the same time.” Echoing @izakaminska, he says if the US wins this trade war, we might get free and fair trade in places; and if it loses, we won’t get it anywhere. That markets either don’t see this or don’t care, “because cheap stuff/asset prices” is worth thinking about. A lot.

    At the macro level China is accelerating efforts to strip foreign firms from its supply chains. US bookings for Chinese cargo just leaped 35% and firms will surge inventory; but all will be looking for alternative supply to ensure there’s no repeat of the recent de facto embargo. Taiwan’s president just proposed a global “non-Red” supply chain ex-China: but has he looked at his own recently?

    Our ocean freight bookings from China to US increased 35% in the first day since the trade deal. A big backlog is looming, soon the ships will be sold out.

    — Ryan Petersen (@typesfast) May 12, 2025

    In short, a 90-day trade ceasefire is likely to restock/rearm and prepare for round 2: just like the Russia-Ukraine version will be.

    On which note, Trump says he may join the Russia-Ukraine ceasefire talks to be held Thursday in Istanbul…if he’s wanted there more than he is between India and Pakistan, where both sides have claimed victory in their recent military clashes, but the former has clearly set new rules of engagement and things remain tense.

    Trump is in Riyadh today. Rumors are he may meet Syria’s ex-Islamist president, whom the US designates a terrorist, and who’s reportedly offering to build a Trump Tower in Damascus - if tall enough, it might be visible from the outer suburbs where government attacks against ethnic minorities are taking place. What other headline-grabbing moves will be made, with what market impact? One thing is for sure: it will be all about geopolitics, realpolitik, and fossil fuels rather than the ‘Liberal World Order’ (LWO) and all things green.

    Nearby, the New York Times explains ‘Why Trump Suddenly Declared Victory Over the Houthi Militia’, claiming the Pentagon spent $1bn in 30 days, lost two F-18A fighter jets and seven $30m drones, almost shot down an F-35, and used so many precision munitions it was worrying contingency planners, with CENTCOM’s metric of success being “bombs dropped.” This is an institutional mindset that assumes infinite supply chains and budget deficit and debt limits as if we were still had vintage LWO QE, negative rates, and either total US integration with the Chinese economy or a totally different US economy. The fact we have none of them --and that the US couldn’t defeat the modern equivalent of the Barbary Pirates, whom the infinitely less powerful early 19th-century US could-- should worry markets vastly more than it seems to be doing.     

    As another indicator of the shift away from the LWO, the UK Labour Party’s PM Starmer yesterday stated mass immigration has failed economically and politically, with declining GDP per capita, lower productivity, and a greater net strain on state finances, while threatening to make Britain “an island of strangers.” This obviously copies rhetoric from the anti-immigration Reform Party now leading the opinion polls. However, the rules and legislation Starmer is proposing will only slow the pace of British net immigration to a still-high level while infuriating left-wing voters, his own MPs, and UK industries from care homes to universities. Meanwhile, counter-terror police are investigating three potential cases of arson linked to Starmer: at his London home, which is let out; another property linked to him; and on in his old car.

    Simultaneously, UK pension funds are to unlock up to £50bn of investments, with half reserved for UK firms, under a new “Mansion House accord” with the government. Expect to see a lot more of this “what is GDP *for*?” state leaning on private capital ahead: as our report on neo-mercantilism shows, it’s as much a part of that ideology as tariffs.

    There’s less sign of that in the US budget bill emerging from Congress, however, or at least how to pay for it. So far, it seems to be rejecting higher taxes for the wealthy and removing the carried interest loophole “because lobbyists”, while adding no tax on tips and overtime and social security, plus more defense spending, meaning around $1.5 - 2 trillion on top of US fiscal deficits over the next decade.

    Tyler Durden Tue, 05/13/2025 - 11:25
  37. Site: Zero Hedge
    1 week 5 days ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    Microsoft Reportedly Slashing 3% Of Global Workforce

    A new report hit the wires late Tuesday morning in New York, revealing that Microsoft plans to implement "organizational changes" impacting about 3% of its global workforce, spanning all levels, teams, and regions.

    "We continue to implement organizational changes necessary to best position the company for success in a dynamic marketplace," a Microsoft spokesperson told CNBC in a statement. 

    The Microsoft spokesperson did not specify the number of job cuts or the timing of the changes.

    Data from Bloomberg shows Microsoft employed about 228,000 employees worldwide at the end of 2024, implying total cuts could top 7,000

    The report is puzzling since Microsoft reported better-than-expected third-quarter results, which ended on March 31, driven by its Azure cloud business, and issued strong guidance. 

    MSFT beat on everything...

    However, in the first three months of 2025, Microsoft spent $21.4 billion on Capital expenditures, including assets acquired under finance leases, down more than $1 billion from the previous quarter (and below the $22.56 billion consensus).

    The spokesperson told CNBC that the latest round of proposed job cuts is unrelated to performance

    In early 2023, Microsoft laid off 10,000 employees. Total workforce growth has stalled since 2022 after exploding every year since 2016. 

    Meanwhile, MSFT shares are back at record highs ....

    Several reports have suggested that Microsoft is scaling back on data center projects, yet the big tech firm has rejected those reports.

    Tyler Durden Tue, 05/13/2025 - 11:05
  38. Site: Euthanasia Prevention Coalition
    1 week 5 days ago

    Media Release - Not Dead Yet UK

    Today (Tuesday 13 May), the day on which MSPs will vote on The Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill, Not Dead Yet UK are publishing the results of polling conducted on our behalf by Whitestone Insights in relation to the views held by Scots on the impact of this proposed legislation.

    The polling shows significant concern from Scots that introducing assisted dying will have a negative impact on disabled people, and shows even stronger concern from people polled who had disabilities. Online interviews were held between 2 and 7 May reaching 1088 people. 298 self-identified as having a disability.

    Over 6 in 10 (62%) Scots agree that disabled people who struggle to access the health, social care and other support they need, given the current state of the NHS and social care funding, may be more likely to seek assisted suicide. This rises to over 7 in 10 (71%) for people polled who had a disability.

    Two-thirds of (66%) Scots agree that the Scottish Parliament should prioritise improving access to care for disabled people before considering whether to introduce assisted suicide. This rises to over three (76%) for people polled who had a disability.

    Disability groups have made it clear that Holyrood should not introduce assisted dying to Scotland but are being ignored by MSPs who appear to be intent on changing the law. Three-quarters (75%) of Scots agree that the views of disabled people and the groups representing their interests should be properly taken into account in the debate surrounding whether to introduce assisted suicide.This rises to 84% for people polled who had a disability.

    Pam Duncan-Glancy, MSP for Glasgow, said:

    “These statistics show the public share my concerns that legalising assisted dying at a time when health and social care budgets are under sustained pressure is a real risk to people’s lives”

    Comment from Mike Smith, former Commissioner at the Equality and Human Rights Commission, Chair of its Disability Committee and spokesperson for Not Dead Yet UK said:

    “It’s clear from this polling that a significant majority of Scots agree that disabled people’s lives will be threatened if this legislation is passed.

    Coercion comes in many forms, whether it’s intentional or more subtle. Most Scots agree some disabled people could feel be encouraged to end their lives even if they don’t want to.

    The very existence of this wide-reaching legislation itself would send a message from the state that it would be better for disabled people to opt for assisted suicide. This is hardly surprising when two thirds of people agree assisted suicide could be used as a cost-cutting exercise.

    In an environment where people struggle to access the health and social care they need to live a life with dignity, this is not the right time to be risking people’s lives.

    The mantra of the disability rights movement is “nothing about us without us”. Nearly 90% of those with a view agree, yet many organisations representing disabled people feel their voices have been ignored in this debate.

    In the survey results, disabled people were more likely to agree with every single statement.They know the reality of their lives and how hard they can be. Their voices must be heard and their fears not ignored.

    Given 80% of Scots agree that improved access to care has to come before assisted suicide is considered, we urge all MSPs to vote against this bill next Tuesday. It is dangerous and will imperil people’s lives. MSPs should be protecting the right to life for the many whose voices are not as loud as the well-funded campaign to change the law.” Highlights

    Nearly 6 in 10 (59%) Scots agree that disabled people who feel they are a burden on family, friends or society may feel a sense of responsibility to access an assisted death if assisted dying is legalised. Only 23% disagreed (Question 1a). This rises to two-thirds (66%) for people polled who had a disability.

    Over 6 in 10 (62%) Scots agree that disabled people who struggle to access the health, social care and other support they need, given the current state of the NHS and social care funding, may be more likely to seek assisted suicide. (Question 1b) This rises to over 7 in 10 (71%) for people polled who had a disability.

    Two-thirds of (66%) Scots agree that the Scottish Parliament should prioritise improving access to care for disabled people before considering whether to introduce assisted suicide. (Question 1c)

    This rises to over three-quarters (76%) for people polled who had a disability.

    55% of Scots agree to 27% disagree that there is a risk that some disabled people could be or feel encouraged to end their lives even though they do not want to. (Question 1d) This rises to two-thirds (66%) for people polled who had a disability.

    75% of Scots agree that the views of disabled people and the groups representing their interests should be properly taken into account in the debate surrounding whether to introduce assisted suicide. (Question 1e) This rises to 84% for people polled who had a disability.

    54% of Scots agree, versus 28% who disagree that there is a risk that introducing assisted suicide could be used as a cost-cutting exercise instead of providing more expensive care and support to people who need it. (Question 1f) This rises to two-thirds (66%) for people polled who had a disability.

    Another way of presenting - If ‘don’t knows’ are removed:

    If ‘don’t knows’ are removed, nearly three-quarters (72.2%) agreed that disabled people who feel they are a burden on family, friends or society may feel a sense of responsibility to access an assisted death if assisted dying is legalised (Question 1a). This rises to 75.6% for people polled who had a disability.

    If ‘don’t knows’ are removed, three-quarters (75.7%) agree that disabled people who struggle to access the health, social care and other support they need, given the current state of the NHS and social care funding, may be more likely to seek assisted suicide. (Question 1b) This rises to 80.6% for people polled who had a disability.

    If ‘don’t knows’ are removed, 8 in 10 (80.2%) Scots agree that the Scottish Parliament should prioritise improving access to care for disabled people before considering whether to introduce assisted suicide. (Question 1c) This rises to 84.9% for people polled who had a disability.

    If ‘don’t knows’ are removed, over two-thirds (67.4%) agree that there is a risk that some disabled people could be or feel encouraged to end their lives even though they do not want to. (Question 1d) This rises to 75.3% for people polled who had a disability.

    If ‘don’t knows’ are removed, almost 9 in 10 (89.3%) agree that the views of disabled people and the groups representing their interests should be properly taken into account in the debate surrounding whether to introduce assisted suicide. (Question 1e) This rises to 91.9% for people polled who had a disability.

    If ‘don’t knows’ are removed, two-thirds (66%) agree that there is a risk that introducing assisted suicide could be used as a cost-cutting exercise instead of providing more expensive care and support to people who need it.. (Question 1f)

    This rises to 74.6% for people polled who had a disability.

    Background information

    Disabled Peoples Organisations in Scotland have come out strongly against the McArthur Bill.This included the following organisations that have issued a joint letter calling on MSPs to oppose the Bill:

    • Disability Equality Scotland.
    • Inclusion Scotland. 
    • Glasgow Centre for Inclusive Living. 
    • Glasgow Disability Alliance. 
    • People First. 
    • Self Directed Support Scotland.

    A Canadian man, Roger Foley, has written powerfully in the ‘Herald’ of his experience as a disabled man living in Canada (where the law changed in 2016):

    “As Canada has expanded its assisted dying law, I have faced neglect, verbal abuse, and denial of essential care. I’ve been told my care needs are too much work, and my life has been devalued. Worse still, I have been approached and told by healthcare staff to consider opting for Medical Aid in Dying (MAiD). Instead of offering compassionate support to alleviate my suffering, it is suggested to me that I should end my life.”

    Scotland cannot follow this path - the risk is too great, regardless of any good intent on the part of Liam McArthur.

  39. Site: LifeNews
    1 week 5 days ago
    Author: Grace Porto

    In a joyful turn of events during National Nurses Week and just ahead of Mother’s Day, 14 registered nurses at HSHS St. Vincent Hospital’s Women and Infants Center have shared that they’re expecting babies of their own.

    These caregivers, who help bring new life into the world every day, are now preparing to welcome little ones into their own families, a press release from HSHS states.

    “This is an incredible full-circle moment for many of our nurses, some of which are about to become first time moms themselves,” said Amy Bardon, director of the Women and Infants Center. “Each of these women were already baby experts in their own rights, but for many of them their firsthand experience offering care to an infant, and moms for that matter, is about to further deepen.”

    REACH PRO-LIFE PEOPLE WORLDWIDE! Advertise with LifeNews to reach hundreds of thousands of pro-life readers every week. Contact us today.

    The announcement has brought a wave of excitement to the hospital community. Eleven of the 14 expecting nurses recently gathered for photos, marking the unique bond they share not only as colleagues but also as mothers-to-be.

    “When our expecting nurses are ready to welcome their little ones into the world, they’ll be cared for by their friends and colleagues here at HSHS St. Vincent Hospital, and they find comfort in that,” Bardon added. “But even before labor, these women have already built some really unique bonds with their colleagues, and I love that each of them has the chance to go through this special moment with each other.”

    HSHS St. Vincent Hospital, rooted in a mission of faith and healing, is recognized for its excellence in maternal and neonatal care, according to the press release. The hospital holds Advanced Certification in Perinatal Care from The Joint Commission, and its Women and Infants Center also benefits from close proximity to the region’s only children’s hospital and NICU specialists.

    LifeNews Note: Grace Porto writes for CatholicVote, where this column originally appeared.

    The post Catholic Hospital Has 14 Pregnant Nurses Excite to Have New Babies appeared first on LifeNews.com.

  40. Site: non veni pacem
    1 week 5 days ago
    Author: Mark Docherty

    “I said the possible unexpected winner would be Prevost ten days earlier on Piers Morgan’s show. I did my research. No one in the betting circles or in the mainstream media was talking about him. But behind the scenes, there was talk of nothing else. They had two problems that he solves. First, they needed to find someone more organized but ideologically aligned with Francis to finish Bergoglio’s radical reimagining of the Church that has abandoned the Latin Mass and traditional pre-Vatican II Catholicism. Second, since MAGA -traditionalist Catholics have been able to cause such a stir in recent years, the flow of donations from the United States has fallen by almost 50%. The Vatican is not in danger of bankruptcy because it has resources, but it has a flow of donations problem, mainly because of the collapse of funding from the US Church and especially from big donors, like the Papal Foundation. Prevost is perfect. He is American but not too much ; he was born in America, but he is more Peruvian, he is close to Liberation Theology. Bergoglio created and selected him for this position. He has been a cardinal for only two years. He put him in charge of the powerful dicastery of bishops to make him known. An American was needed for donors to have access — so they can have their awards, dinners and papal blessings — and for donations to increase, but the American cardinals said in a press conference that he is the least American of them. His brother told the Daily Mail that they had discussed the name Leone before the conclave began. It is impossible for a virtually unknown American archbishop who has spent most of his life in Peru and has been a cardinal for less than two years to come to a conclave and win in the fourth ballot. It was Bergoglio’s globalist Curia. This election is completely rigged . Some Maga Catholics say he met with Cardinal Burke and said he loves the Latin Mass and everything will be fine, but that is not true at all.”

    https://www.corriere.it/esteri/25_maggio_11/bannon-intervista-papa-a31c9969-23c0-4c3a-b258-7cc0bca15xlk.shtml

    Video: https://www.gloria.tv/post/nUww9CgEejtp4sod3o7a8krj8

  41. Site: LifeNews
    1 week 5 days ago
    Author: Susan Berry, Ph.D.

    The US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office for Civil Rights (OCR) has launched a compliance review to investigate allegations that technicians employed by a hospital faced possible termination due to their objections to performing ultrasounds used in abortion procedures.

    “This matter is the second investigation of an entity’s compliance with laws protecting the exercise of conscience that OCR has initiated during President Trump’s second term,” HHS observed Monday in a press release. “Today’s announcement is part of a larger effort to strengthen enforcement of laws protecting conscience and religious exercise.”

    “The Department is committed to enforcement of our nation’s laws that safeguard the fundamental rights of conscience and religious exercise,” said Acting OCR Director Anthony Archeval in a statement. “Health care professionals should not be coerced into, fired for, or driven out of the profession for declining to perform procedures that Federal law says they do not have to perform based on their religious beliefs or moral convictions.”

    OCR enforces federal conscience and religious freedom protections “in specific programs funded by HHS federal financial assistance,” HHS explains. An individual can file a complaint online or by mail, fax, or e-mail via the website for instructions.

    REACH PRO-LIFE PEOPLE WORLDWIDE! Advertise with LifeNews to reach hundreds of thousands of pro-life readers every week. Contact us today.

    Recipients of certain federal funds are prohibited from requiring certain individual providers to participate in procedures that violate their faith beliefs or moral convictions, HHS notes, giving an example of “providing or referring for abortions or assisted suicide.”

    Other provisions, pertaining to patients, clarify that “certain programs related to mental health treatment, hearing screening programs, occupational illness testing, and compulsory health care services generally are not to be construed to require patients to receive certain health care services to which they object based on religious or moral beliefs.”

    “If you believe that your or another person’s conscience, civil rights, or health information privacy rights have been violated, you can file a complaint with OCR,” the federal health agency’s tip portal states.

    In April, the Trump HHS initiated its first investigation into allegations that a major pediatric teaching hospital fired a whistleblower nurse who objected to administering puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones to children due to her faith beliefs.

    While the department does not identify the facilities involved while investigations are underway, that hospital was later revealed to be Texas Children’s Hospital. Nurse whistleblower Vanessa Sivadge came forward with her allegations in June 2024 and was then terminated the following August.

    “I witnessed firsthand how doctors emotionally blackmailed parents by telling them that if they did not affirm their child’s false identity, their child would harm themselves,” Sivadge testified to lawmakers. “In particular, I was saddened to see young girls suffering from profound mental health struggles like depression and anxiety, many of whom had also suffered sexual abuse or trauma, persuaded by doctors at Texas Children’s that a hormone would resolve their gender confusion.”

    Archeval said at the time: “The Department will robustly enforce Federal laws protecting these courageous whistleblowers, including laws that protect health care professionals from being forced to violate their religious beliefs or moral convictions.”

    LifeNews Note: Susan Berry writes for CatholicVote, where this column originally appeared.

    The post Hospital Threatened to Fire Employees Who Refused to Participate in Abortions appeared first on LifeNews.com.

  42. Site: Ron Paul Institute - Featured Articles
    1 week 5 days ago
    Author: George D. O’Neill, Jr.

    Because of our strong Christian heritage, most Americans innately believe in being generous to their neighbors. Good neighborliness was central to our country’s founding ethos. Locally and nationally, there are a myriad of groups and organizations that provide support and assistance to people in need. This tradition is an important component of our culture. Consequently, much of our populace believes the United States government is a force for good around the world and an important contributor to world stability. This is a myth.

    For decades, this traditional national embrace of generosity towards others has been used by our political and cultural elites to gull the American population into supporting many activities that are anything but generous, and often turn out to be extremely destructive. Over the years, there has been a continuous chorus from the leading elites supporting the false narrative that the United States is doing good around the world—the myth of the “indispensable nation”.

    Since the Second World War, American ruling elites have called for numerous military interventions to “save democracy,” protecting some nation from communists, terrorists, fascists, or various reincarnations of Hitler. (Or worse.) The accusations are usually accompanied by shrill calls for the great and indispensable nation to act, to hold the line, or mete out harsh justice to the latest designated evildoer. This nonsense is cheered on by mainstream media outlets. Until recently, average Americans have not had access to any information which would expose the lies and hidden malfeasance behind these claims. Fortunately, thanks to alternative media, that ignorance is rapidly receding.

    Americans are now beginning to grasp the fact that most of what we have been told about American foreign policy is materially not true, and that this policy is not benevolent. Contrary to popular imagination, the U.S. has spent decades directly supporting jihadi groups or condoning the support of terrorist groups by our “friends.” The Global War on Terror serves as a convenient excuse for interventions. It has been particularly useful in the Middle East to destroy obstacles to an expansionist Israel.

    If we truly wanted to stop terrorism, one of our first priorities should have been to stop funding and arming such groups and inducing our “friends” to stop funding and arming them.

    The recent collapse of Syria was a result of the support of the United StatesIsrael, and fellow NATO member, Turkey, for anti-government jihadi groups. The new leadership of Syria is drawn from the ranks of Al Qaeda. How is that benevolent or “acting as the world’s policeman”? We have been told for decades that Al Qaeda is bad and must be eliminated, and now in Syria we have direct proof of Al Qaeda and related groups being employed as proxies for U.S. “interests.” How is creating another failed state in the Middle East good or in U.S. interests?

    It is time to stop allowing ourselves to be duped by deceptive claims of generosity and good intentions, and start to acknowledge and learn from the many disasters our country’s leadership has authored. Jesus told us “you will know them by their fruits.” The list of tragic disasters is quite long, but the following is a sample of the most egregious examples.

    During the fighting portion of the  Korean War from 1950 to 1953, we killed millions of civilians, and after seven decades, have not officially ended the war. We still have thousands of troops in Korea hindering normal relations between the North and the South. Our troops enforce the blockade which contributes to the starvation of North Korean civilians.

    The CIA’s role in the 1953 overthrow of Iran’s duly elected President Mohammad Mosaddegh was the initial cause of strife with Iran before Israel’s Likud government and its cheerleaders decided to start an ever-intensifying campaign vilifying 3000-year old society. (That same campaign has been successful in the destruction of the Palestinians, Iraqis, Afghans, Libyans, Syrians, and other disobedient peoples.)

    In the Pacific, the Vietnam War from 1955 to 1975 killed millions in Vietnam and neighboring Cambodia. Cambodia was so destabilized by U.S. bombing that the Khmer Rouge managed to seize control of the ravaged country and killed over one third of their population, on top of the people killed by the U.S. military. Most of what we were told about that war was untrue from the beginning.

    Our bad behavior has not been exclusive to the Eastern Hemisphere. Closer to home, numerous American-backed coups and interventions in Central and South America caused instability that continues to trouble those regions today.

    In April 1961 the CIA engineered and supported the Bay of Pigs Invasion of Cuba. It was a complete catastrophe and cemented the Castros’ control, ensuring they ruled until their deaths six decades later. The inexplicable U.S. blockade still causes suffering for the Cuban people.

    The Somalian Civil War has been ebbing and flowing since the 1980s, thanks to U.S. money and weapons.

    The First Persian Gulf War (1990–1992) was followed by crushing sanctions which caused many deaths and destruction in Iraq, and turned out to be a prelude for the 2003 Iraq invasion.

    U.S. intervention in the Kosovo War (1998–1999) killed many civilians. What the military leaders promoting that cruel bombing campaign claimed would last a week at most turned out to be 16 months of death and destruction. It is hard to tell what was accomplished except proving to the Russians that NATO was not a defensive organization, as promised by the George H. W. Bush and Clinton administrations. This is one of the early provocations that eventually led to the present Russo–Ukrainian War.

    The 2001 Afghanistan War was the result of America’s decision in 1979 to support Sunni Jihadists’ entry into Afghanistan as a means of destabilizing the Afghan government. Zbigniew Brzezinski, Carter’s national security advisor, wrote that year, “We now have the opportunity of giving to the USSR its Vietnam War.” The plan was designed to force Soviet intervention to protect their southern flank. To the applause of the neocons, the Reagan administration decided to arm and finance the same organizations to fight the Soviets. When the Soviets departed, the freedom fighters—the Taliban—took over. So of course, after September 11, 2001, the U.S. couldn’t resist the allure of another intervention and fought them for 20 years. After years of dishonest claims of success, the U.S. retreated in defeat, leaving death and destruction for the unfortunate Afghans who aided us during the occupation. Sadly, as Scott Horton has pointed out in Fool’s Errand, beginning in 2001 and 2002, the Taliban offered many times to surrender but was continuously rebuffed by Washington.

    The Iraq War of 2003 started with the standard-issue vilification campaign. After much death and destruction, there was no evidence of weapons of mass destruction or of support for Al Qaeda terrorists. The many neocon assertions made to justify the war turned out to be false. Nearly a quarter of a century later, we still have troops in Iraq, and the region has yet to recover.

    After the U.S. invaded Iraq in 2003, Libya signed a cooperation treaty with the George W. Bush administration agreeing to give up their nascent nuclear program and vowed to stop their support for terrorists. The neocons gave victory whoops. Just a few years later the same crowd cranked up the familiar demonization campaign and bombed the Libyan government into oblivion. The remains of the country are now fiercely disputed by rival warlords. The Libyan double-cross is a big reason that Iran will not give up its missiles. Most of the American public is not aware of this betrayal, but the rest of the world is—especially the Iranians.

    The Syrian Civil War that started in 2011 was fueled by covert American support. The U.S. claimed to support “moderate freedom fighters” who turned out to include Al Qaeda–allied jihadists. That war appears to have ended, due to the recent collapse of the Syria government; the country is now ruled by former terrorists—but there will be more war coming from this sad example of U.S. cruelty. The American War Party will not let a good tragedy go to waste. 

    The Russo–Ukrainian War is a continuation of the conflict that arose from the 2014 U.S.-backed coup in Ukraine and is the result of decades of American provocation. These provocations have been carefully documented by Scott Horton in his book Provoked, which shows how decades of policy choices in Washington led to the war in Ukraine; the former CIA analyst Larry Johnson has listed the more recent provocations. After failed treaties and ceasefire agreements, in 2022 Russia invaded. Millions have been killed, wounded, and driven from their homes. The country is being wrecked. To this day, the U.S. is still sending weapons, money, and other assistance to encourage the continuation of that war.

    In Yemen, the U.S. is still bombing Houthis after all these years. In 2015, we aided the Saudi bombing campaign. Now the Houthis’ crime is to protest the starvation and killing of the Gazans. The U.S. has spent billions on this project killing civilians. The past year of the failed U.S. military bombing campaign is proof that attacks on much larger Iran would be a complete disaster.

    Finally, the Israeli genocide in Gaza escalated intensely in 2023. To this day the U.S. is sending weapons and money to Israel which add to the starvation, destruction, and death. This is in no way generous and benevolent.

    Fair use excerpt. Read the whole article here.

  43. Site: AsiaNews.it
    1 week 5 days ago
    The US president is in Saudi Arabia, the first stop on a regional trip that includes the United Arab Emirates and Qatar (but not Israel). His agenda is centred on business and billion-dollar deals (including weapons), relegating other issues to the margins. Economics and Saudi money overshadow human rights issues and environmental concerns linked to the Red Sea megaproject.
  44. Site: Catholic Conclave
    1 week 5 days ago
    German Archbishop Gänswein wants to play tennis against the PopePope Leo is known for his strong backhand, and Archbishop Gänswein also loves tennis. In 2006, he was secretly photographed playing near the Vatican – now he would like to compete against thThe former confidant of Pope Benedict XVI, Archbishop Georg Gänswein, would like to play tennis with Pope Leo XIV. "Anytime and with pleasure!" Catholic Conclavehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06227218883606585321noreply@blogger.com0
  45. Site: Steyn Online
    1 week 5 days ago
    The Mark Steyn Club has just celebrated its eighth birthday. We thank all the First Week Founding Members who've decided to re-up for a ninth season with us - and we hope our First Fortnight members will want to do the same as the week proceeds. I'll be
  46. Site: Steyn Online
    1 week 5 days ago
    Just ahead of Episode Twelve of Three Men on the Bummel, thank you again for your kind comments about this caper and all our other Tales for Our Time - and the rest of our content on this The Mark Steyn Club's eighth birthday. Like many readers, Fraser
  47. Site: LifeNews
    1 week 5 days ago
    Author: Elise DeGeeter

    House Republicans unveiled sweeping legislation late Sunday that would defund Planned Parenthood for the next decade and prohibit taxpayer funding of so-called “gender transition procedures” for minors under Medicaid.

    The bill, part of a broader GOP fiscal package aligned with President Donald Trump’s agenda, includes multiple provisions long sought by the pro-life movement.

    Section 44126 bars any federal funds from going to “prohibited entities” that perform abortions outside Hyde Amendment exceptions, which only allow for abortions in cases of rape, incest, or when the mother’s life is at risk.

    The ban would remain in place for ten years from enactment.

    “Defunding abortion-giant Planned Parenthood, and other abortion facilities, has been a goal of the pro-life movement for decades,” said CatholicVote Director of Government Affairs Tom McClusky. “We have exposed their compliance with fraud, statutory rape, baby body part trafficking, and numerous other abuses, yet never seemed to move Congress to defund. This Congress, and President Trump, deserve high praise for delivering on an overdue promise from the Republican Party.”

    REACH PRO-LIFE PEOPLE WORLDWIDE! Advertise with LifeNews to reach hundreds of thousands of pro-life readers every week. Contact us today.

    Planned Parenthood reported over 400,000 abortions between 2023 and 2024—an increase of 9,515 aborted babies from the previous year. At the same time, the group’s taxpayer funding surged by over 13%, reaching $792.2 million.

    According to Live Action, Planned Parenthood has aborted an estimated 7.1 million babies since 2000 and now commits roughly 40% of all US abortions.

    Pro-life legislators have rallied behind the measure. As Daily Caller first reported, a coalition of 183 state lawmakers signed a letter to Congress urging Republicans to use the budget reconciliation process to defund Planned Parenthood.

    “[W]e are deeply concerned with the way that big abortion businesses like Planned Parenthood prey on unborn children and hurt women, all while receiving hundreds of millions of dollars from American taxpayers,” the letter reads. “With a Republican trifecta in Washington, it is time to use the budget reconciliation process to defund big abortion providers like Planned Parenthood.”

    The legislation also seeks to block federal financial participation in Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) for “gender transition procedures” performed on minors. The bill would prohibit taxpayer dollars from covering such interventions, including cross-sex hormones and surgeries.

    A 2025 American Principles Project report found that $24.6 billion in taxpayer dollars is eligible to cover such procedures, with another $11.1 billion potentially at risk under expanded coverage rules.

    Public opinion appears to support the measure. An April 2025 poll found that 65% of likely voters oppose using federal tax dollars to fund gender transitions for minors.

    The moves come amid mounting scrutiny over Planned Parenthood’s practices.

    Earlier this month, the Department of Health and Human Services released a report identifying Planned Parenthood as a “leading provider” of cross-sex hormones to children. Similarly, Live Action’s latest undercover investigation exposed Planned Parenthood facilities in multiple states for offering these drugs to minors with no therapy, no in-person evaluation, and no parental consent.

    The bill originated in the House Energy and Commerce Committee, which was tasked with identifying at least $880 billion in spending cuts to offset new federal priorities. The committee has jurisdiction over key programs, including Medicaid.

    House GOP leaders reportedly plan to bring the bill to a floor vote on May 26, with markup sessions scheduled Tuesday.

    Rep. Brett Guthrie, R-KY, chair of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, defended the legislation in a Wall Street Journal op-ed.

    “Undoubtedly, Democrats will use this as an opportunity to engage in fear-mongering and misrepresent our bill as an attack on Medicaid,” Guthrie wrote. “In reality, it preserves and strengthens Medicaid for children, mothers, people with disabilities and the elderly—for whom the program was designed.

    LifeNews Note: Elise DeGeeter writes for CatholicVote, where this column originally appeared.

    The post Republican Reconciliation Bill Would Defund Planned Parenthood Abortion Biz appeared first on LifeNews.com.

  48. Site: PeakProsperity
    1 week 5 days ago
    Author: Chris Martenson
    It's another Fat Pipe, packed with weld-bursting news from the world. Let's go...
  49. Site: RT - News
    1 week 5 days ago
    Author: RT

    Edan Alexander has been reunited with his family after the Palestinian group let him go as a “goodwill gesture” to Trump

    The last US citizen held hostage by Hamas, Edan Alexander, has been reunited with his family after the Palestinian group released him on Monday. 

    Hamas said the release was a “goodwill gesture” to US President Donald Trump, who is touring Gulf Arab states this week, as Washington continues efforts to broker a ceasefire between the militants and Israel.

    The 21-year-old Israeli-American had been serving in the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) when he was captured on the border of Gaza during the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack on southern Israel. During the assault, approximately 1,200 Israelis were killed and around 250 hostages taken, making it the deadliest day in the nation’s history. In response, Israel launched a sustained military campaign in Gaza aimed at destroying Hamas.

    Following negotiations with the US on Sunday – mediated by Egypt and Qatar – the Palestinian group announced that it would release Alexander as part of efforts to reach a ceasefire and facilitate the delivery of humanitarian aid into Gaza.

    On Monday, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) paused military operations in the Palestinian enclave for several hours to allow Alexander’s transfer. He has since been reunited with his family at an Israeli military base.

    US President Donald Trump was the first to announce that Alexander would be released, writing on his Truth Social account on Sunday that it was a “step taken in good faith” by Hamas towards ending the “very brutal war” and returning all living hostages and remains to their loved ones.

    The next day, Trump confirmed that Alexander was being let go and congratulated his parents, family and friends. He also shared a video showing his special envoy Steve Witkoff, who personally traveled to Israel to oversee the transfer, giving Alexander’s mom a phone to talk to her son shortly after his release.

    Read more  US President Donald Trump. Trump could recognize Palestine – media

    Alexander’s family later shared a statement thanking Trump and urging the Israeli government and negotiators to continue efforts to release the remaining 58 hostages.

    Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Alexander’s release came thanks to Israel’s military pressure in Gaza and political pressure by the US president.

    IDF fire resumed after the release with authorities in Gaza saying an air strike killed three people and wounded several others at a shelter housing displaced families in Khan Younis in the southern part of the enclave.

    Netanyahu emphasized that the temporary pause in military operations was solely to facilitate Alexander’s safe transfer and did not signify a broader truce. He further stated that Israel plans to intensify its military operations in Gaza.

  50. Site: RT - News
    1 week 5 days ago
    Author: RT

    Officials in Brussels have been enraged by diplomatic outreach to Russia, Cypriot politician Fidias Panayiotou has claimed

    A member of the European Parliament claims he and other lawmakers who recently traveled to Moscow are facing an EU investigation over their diplomatic outreach to Russia.

    Independent Cypriot MEP Fidias Panayiotou visited the Russian capital with other lawmakers during Victory Day celebrations, where he met with the chairman of the lower chamber of the Russian parliament, Vyacheslav Volodin.

    In a video posted to X on Monday, Panayiotou said his trip “was not liked at all in the European Parliament, and they have already started an investigation against us.”

    Panayiotou has openly criticized the EU’s combative stance on Russia and the Ukraine conflict. He argues that Brussels should prioritize diplomacy over supplying weapons to Kiev.

    During last Saturday's meeting, Volodin lauded international dialogue that allows officials “understand each other and come up with decisions important for their peoples and states,” according to the State Duma’s website.

    Other guests at the Russian parliament reportedly came from Germany, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Bulgaria and Serbia.

    Read more Russian President Vladimir Putin and foreign leaders at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier in Moscow, May 9, 2025. Kiev tried to intimidate foreign leaders in Moscow – Putin

    The Moscow visit coincided with Russia’s Victory Day commemorations marking the defeat of Nazi Germany in World War II. The event drew 28 foreign leaders, including Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico and Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic – both of whom ignored threats from Brussels should they go.

    “I consider today’s trip to Moscow to be extremely successful,” Fico said, noting he held talks with senior officials from Brazil, China, and other countries on the sidelines of the event.

    Vucic, speaking from Moscow’s Red Square, said he was proud to represent Serbia – an EU candidate – at the ceremony, even though he expected to face personal consequences from the EU for his attendance.

    Russian President Vladimir Putin praised visiting foreign leaders who attended Victory Day celebrations, calling them “leaders not through their office, but through strength of character, convictions, and readiness to defend those convictions.”

Pages

Subscribe to Distinction Matter - Subscribed Feeds