No one is forced to be a Christian. But no one should be forced to live according to the "new religion" as though it alone were definitive and obligatory for all mankind.
Distinction Matter - Subscribed Feeds
-
Site: Zero HedgeZelensky Relieved As Trump Quietly Drops A Key DemandTyler Durden Fri, 05/02/2025 - 14:20
A key Trump demand of the Zelensky government was quietly dropped as a condition of peace talks as well as the Ukraine minerals deal, which was finally signed this week.
Washington is no longer seeking to pressure or force President Volodymyr Zelensky to hold elections that could result in his being ousted office for the sake of peace, according to information in The Telegraph.
"The demand has been quietly dropped from the latest set of American proposals for a ceasefire," The Telegraph writes. "The American decision to stop demanding elections is designed to placate the Ukrainian officials who have argued against swathes of a seven-point peace plan tabled by Mr Trump."
The minerals deal still has to be formally approved by Ukraine's parliament, according to the nation's constitution. Below is said to be the current seven-point plan offered by Trump, aspects of which were previously rejected by Ukrainian officials...
As for dropping the demand for Zelensky and parliament to hold elections, the Kremlin itself seems to have somewhat quieted down on this in recent weeks.
Without doubt, Moscow still wants to see Zelensky go, but appears willing to not press the issue if he were willing to give up territory for the sake of ceasefire (which so far isn't happening - not even regarding Crimea).
Zelensky's term in office expired in May 2024, and Ukrainian parliament has recently reaffirmed the 'constitutionality' of Zelensky's mandate as leader of the country during wartime. Trump soon after taking the Oval called him a 'dictator' who canceled elections, and even long before that called him the "world's greatest salesman" as he received hundreds of billions from the US and Western allies.
Meanwhile, fresh statements from US Secretary of State Marco Rubio express continued optimism on the potential for peace. He says "they're closer" to peace - in reference to Moscow and Kiev.
Source: ANSA
"For a hundred days he has done efforts to bring about peace… Look, we’ve gotten closer. We – for the first time – we haven’t known this for three years – we kind of can see what it would take for Ukraine to stop. We can see what it would take for the Russians to stop," Rubio said.
He then noted, "They’re closer, but they’re still far apart. And it’s going to take a real breakthrough here very soon to make this possible… or I think the president is going to have to make a decision about how much more time we’re going to dedicate to this," he added.
It's been widely reported that during Zelensky's impromptu 15-meeting with President Trump on the sidelines of the pope's funeral last weekend he was able to ease the pressure on Kiev coming from Trump.
"Zelensky's advisers were divided about whether he should even risk the tête-à-tête after the disaster in the Oval Office," Axios reported days after the meeting. "But after it, Zelensky felt he'd managed to shift Trump's thinking about Putin for the first time, the sources say."
-
Site: Zero HedgeRFK Jr: HHS Became A "Collaborator In Child Trafficking" Under BidenTyler Durden Fri, 05/02/2025 - 14:05
Authored by Debra Heine via American Greatness,
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert Kennedy Jr. said Wednesday that HHS is no longer facilitating child trafficking in the United States and is instead “very aggressively” searching for the hundreds of thousands of migrant children lost by the Biden administration.
“We have ended HHS’s role as the principal vector in this country for child trafficking,” Kennedy said during a White House Cabinet meeting with President Trump and other top administration officials to mark the first 100 days of the president’s second term.
“During the Biden administration, HHS became a collaborator in child trafficking for sex and for slavery, and we have ended that,” RFK Jr. declared.
In November 0f 2022, an HHS volunteer came forward to accuse the Biden regime of knowingly participating in the sex-trafficking of minor children after observing how it processed unaccompanied migrant children at an HHS Emergency Intake Site in Pomona, California.
The whistleblower, Tara Lee Rodas, went to Project Veritas with her first hand account of how the Biden regime’s corrupt child sponsorship program exploited and endangered vulnerable unaccompanied minors by placing them with criminal, noncitizen sponsors.
In some cases, dozens of unaccompanied alien children (UAC) were sent to the same residence of an unvetted sponsor.
Thousands of these minors “ended up in punishing jobs across the country—working overnight in slaughterhouses, replacing roofs, operating machinery in factories—all in violation of child labor laws,” the New York Times reported in February of 2023.
In August of 2024, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Inspector General released a blistering report showing that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) had lost track of up to 320,000 unaccompanied minors over the previous five years.
Approximately 291,000 of those were released into the U.S. and never given a date to appear in immigration court.
Another 32,000 children were released with hearing dates but failed to show up to their immigration hearings.
“We’re very aggressively going out and trying to find these 300,000 children that were lost by the Biden administration,” RFK Jr. said Wednesday.
Homeland Security agents in California recently rescued two teenage migrant sisters from Honduras who were being held in captivity at a hotel in West Covina, California, the New York Post reported.
Christopher Ramirez was allegedly “pimping” the sisters, ages 16 and 18, sources told the Post.
The youngest victim was placed in the custody of Biden’s HHS, which placed her with her sponsor. The older teen was released after declining “services or placement.”
Cops with the West Covina Police Department initially found the girls and arrested Ramirez on local charges.
The feds are still looking for co-conspirators who helped move the migrant girls, who are from Honduras, from Texas to California and forced them into prostitution, sources said.
Ramirez is also facing federal charges.
The Trump administration has reunited approximately 5,000 unaccompanied migrant children with family members or “safe guardians” in its first 70 days, Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Trici McLaughlin said in an X post.
“Unlike the previous administration, President Trump and Secretary [Kristi] Noem take the responsibility to protect children seriously and will continue to work with federal law enforcement to reunite children with their families,” said McLaughlin.
-
Site: LifeNews
Sister Inah Canabarro, a Brazilian nun who was declared the oldest person in the world in January, passed away April 30.
AP News reports that Sister Inah’s religious congregation, the Company of Saint Teresa of Jesus in Porto Alegre, Brazil, said she died at home of natural causes. She would have turned 117 on May 27.
Now, the oldest person in the world is Ethel Caterham, a 115-year-old British woman.
Please subscribe to the LifeNews YouTube channel for the latest pro-life videos.
As CatholicVote previously reported, Sister Inah credited the Catholic faith for her longevity. As a child growing up in Brazil, she was so skinny that her relatives did not think she would survive childhood.
Pope Francis honored Sister Inah on her 110th birthday, and every year, on her birthday, Porto Alegre’s soccer team celebrated their oldest fan.
LifeNews Note: Grace Porto writes for CatholicVote, where this column originally appeared.
The post Catholic Nun Who Was the Oldest Woman in the World Passes Away Before Her 117th Birthday appeared first on LifeNews.com.
-
Site: Zero Hedge125,000 New Yorkers Fled For Florida The Last 5 Years, Taking $14 Billion With ThemTyler Durden Fri, 05/02/2025 - 13:40
More than 125,000 New Yorkers relocated to Florida over a recent five-year span, draining the Empire State of nearly $14 billion in income, according to a new report from the Citizens Budget Commission (CBC), a nonpartisan fiscal watchdog, reported on by the New York Post.
Roughly a third of those fleeing New York City—some 41,251 residents—resettled in Miami-Dade, Palm Beach, and Broward counties between 2018 and 2022, resulting in a $10 billion loss in adjusted gross income (AGI) for the city. An additional $3.8 billion in income was lost to other Florida destinations.
“They are getting something more beneficial to them,” said CBC President Andrew Rein. “The key is with any place you need the benefits to outweigh the cost. The question right now for New York is what do we offer?”
The CBC attributes the exodus to a mix of affordability concerns, public safety, quality of life, and lingering pandemic effects. Only 30% of New Yorkers rated city life as “good or excellent” in 2023—down from 50% pre-pandemic.
The Post writes that high-income earners led the charge. Miami-Dade saw an influx of ex-New Yorkers with average incomes topping $266,000. Palm Beach newcomers earned around $189,000, while Fairfield County, Connecticut, drew residents with an average income of $141,000. Notably, New York’s top 1% of earners pay 40% of the state’s income taxes.
“One of the critical issues of our time is keeping our competitiveness for businesses and residents,” Rein said. “We need to focus on ensuring we don’t tax too much, that we are a safe place to live, and that people find quality of life to be high.”
Florida wasn’t the only winner. Nearby suburbs absorbed thousands of city dwellers:
-
Long Island gained 138,000 NYC expats, costing the city $11.1 billion in AGI.
-
Westchester County added nearly 60,000, for a $5 billion hit.
-
Fairfield County took in 31,000, costing $4.9 billion.
-
Bergen County, New Jersey, saw over 30,000 newcomers, with a $1.8 billion impact.
Altogether, relocations within the Northeast accounted for a $22.8 billion loss in AGI and a population decline of more than 230,000.
Despite a doubling of millionaires in New York from 2010 to 2022—from 36,000 to 70,000—the state’s share of U.S. millionaires dropped sharply, falling from 12.7% to 8.7%.
“Our competitiveness depends in part on quality of life and public safety,” said Rein. “Simply put, some people found the value proposition of other places to be higher than New York City.”
-
-
Site: Fr. Z's BlogUp went the sun at 06:03. Down it’ll go at 20:12. The Ave Maria Bell, you ask? For the Curia 20:30. However, the real schedule is pegged to sunset. Today is a 1st Friday. It is the Feast of St. … Read More →
-
Site: Mises InstituteIf a politician claims that he cares about the national debt, but then won't make big cuts to current federal spending, he's either a liar or a fool.
-
Site: Zero HedgeThe Awards You Never Get When InvestingTyler Durden Fri, 05/02/2025 - 13:20
Authored by Lance Roberts via RealInvestmentAdvice.com,
In investing, success is often judged by numbers - returns on investment, percentage gains, and the ability to outperform benchmarks like the S&P 500.
However, some investors frequently pursue a peculiar set of “awards” without realizing the pitfalls they embody. These unspoken goals, while tempting, rarely lead to sustainable investment success. If there were awards for some of these common but ill-advised behaviors, they would likely cause more harm than good. Here are some of the “investing awards” you’ll never receive, because chasing them isn’t worth the cost.
I Never Sold At A Loss Medal
Market volatility is an inherent aspect of investing. Striving to avoid all losses, or drawdowns, is unrealistic. Trying to sidestep volatility often leads to lower returns and missed growth opportunities. Overly conservative investments may not keep pace with inflation, steadily eroding purchasing power. Managing risk effectively instead of avoiding it is essential for long-term portfolio success.
Many investors pride themselves on never realizing a loss, believing that holding every position until it turns profitable is a badge of honor. However, this mindset often leads to holding onto poor performers indefinitely, tying up capital that could be better deployed elsewhere. This behavior is a classic example of behavioral mistakes investors make, specifically the “disposition effect,” where investors hold losing assets too long while selling winners too early. Focusing solely on avoiding losses often damages overall portfolio returns.
Like everything in life, there is a “season” and a “cycle.” When it comes to the markets, “seasons” are dictated by the “technical and economic constructs,” and the “cycles” are dictated by “valuations.” The seasons are shown in the chart below.
As such, successful investing requires disciplined pruning to maintain a healthy garden. Recognizing when an investment no longer aligns with your strategy and cutting losses early frees up capital for better opportunities. There is no award for stubbornly holding a stock that continues to drag down your portfolio.
I Took On As Much Risk As I Could Award
During bull markets, taking on excessive risk seems attractive. High-risk assets like speculative tech stocks or cryptocurrencies often deliver eye-catching gains. Some investors view risk-taking as bravery. But the reality is that high risk doesn’t guarantee higher returns; it is frequently quite the opposite. As Howard Marks previously discussed, risk and volatility aren’t the same thing. For years, many investors (and academics) have been taught that volatility, the ups and downs of stock prices, equals risk. However, volatility is just one part of the picture, but risk is the probability of losing money. Just because prices bounce around doesn’t mean you’re at risk of a loss.
However, “High risk equals high reward” is not always true. Just because an investment has a higher degree of risk does not guarantee it will deliver superior returns. Given that risk is the probability of losing money, taking on excess risk does increase the potential for poor returns over time. In other words, increasing risk increases the potential for significant losses. As such, investors must be careful about chasing returns without fully understanding the risks. The goal should be to weigh the possible outcomes and ensure the potential reward is worth the risk taken.
A good example was in 2022, when retail investors chasing meme stocks, SPACs, and IPOs suffered significantly heavier losses than the index. At that time, the ARK Innovation Fund, managed by Cathy Wood, was an example of peak speculation in the market. However, since then, those investments failed to recover. In other words, speculative risk-taking did not lead to outsized returns.
Sustainable investing requires aligning investments with financial goals and risk tolerance to avoid exposing one’s future to unnecessary volatility. Diversification, not reckless risk-taking, remains the best tool for improving risk-adjusted returns. While speculative investments lack the excitement and thrill, prudent investors build strategies focused on taking calculated, strategic risks that contribute to long-term wealth.
“You don’t get rewarded for taking risk; you get rewarded for buying cheap assets. And if the assets you bought got pushed up in price simply because they were risky, then you are not going to be rewarded for taking a risk; you are going to be punished for it.” – Jeremy Grantham
Successful investors avoid “risk” at all costs, even if it means underperforming in the short term. The reason is that while the media and Wall Street have you focused on chasing market returns in the short term, ultimately, the excess “risk” built into your portfolio will lead to inferior long-term returns. Wile E. Coyote never received an award for chasing the Roadrunner over the cliff.
I’m a Long-Term Investor (Only When I’m Losing Money) Certificate
A common rationalization is to claim to be a long-term investor only when losses mount. When an investment underperforms, investors often tell themselves they are simply “staying the course,” using time to justify inaction. Research by Barberis and Thaler (2003) on behavioral biases shows that loss aversion—the tendency to prefer avoiding losses over acquiring gains—strongly influences this behavior.
True long-term investing demands more than patience; it requires a disciplined, objective framework. This means purchasing quality assets with strong fundamentals, establishing clear investment theses, and periodically reassessing those theses. Successful investors, like Warren Buffett, have emphasized that staying invested in a poorly performing asset without reevaluating it is not long-term investing—it is emotional decision-making disguised as strategy.
A good example is Intel (INTC) versus Texas Instruments. Over the last five years, Intel has lost 62% of its value as it lost its chip-making dominance to companies like AMD, Nvidia, Broadcom, and others. For investors holding Intel, many are hoping that something will occur and they can recover that loss. However, at any point over the last 5 years, they could have sold Intel and bought virtually any other chip maker and increased their wealth. While there are many examples, this exemplifies the point of opportunity cost. Holding a losing asset for long periods eats away at the wealth-building process and consumes our most precious commodity: time.
Building a resilient portfolio is not about loyalty to individual positions. It is about effective asset allocation, risk management, and ongoing evaluation. Markets evolve, industries change, and even once-promising companies can lose their competitive edge. Recognizing when an investment no longer fits your portfolio’s long-term goals—and having the discipline to move on—is a hallmark of professional investing, not a weakness.
I Never Used Stop-Losses Or Managed Risk Ribbon
Some investors view risk management strategies like stop-losses, portfolio rebalancing, and diversification as unnecessary restraints on potential gains. Instead, they trust intuition, believing they can “ride out” volatility. Behavioral research (Shefrin, 2000) shows that overconfidence is one of individual investors’ most common mistakes, often leading to catastrophic losses when market conditions change suddenly.
Managing risk effectively isn’t about fear or pessimism. It is about protecting your capital from irreparable damage so that you can continue participating in future market growth. Stop-losses are designed not to predict downturns but to limit exposure to individual positions that deteriorate beyond acceptable thresholds. Similarly, rebalancing prevents portfolios from drifting into unintended risk concentrations over time.
An example of risk management can be very simplistic. For example, using a 40-week moving average as a “risk off” indicator can help avoid more protracted market drawdowns.
We can apply a “risk management” strategy to that moving average to reduce risk during corrective periods. For this example, when the S&P 500 breaks below the 40-week moving average, stock exposure is reduced by 50%, and it reverses to 100% when the index crosses above that moving average. The results are shown below.
While there are times when investors were triggered to reduce and then increase exposures quickly, the 2000 and 2008 financial crises underscored the consequences of unmanaged portfolios. Many investors holding full exposures to equities without risk controls suffered permanent losses (Brunnermeier, 2009). Risk management is the bridge between surviving market turbulence and thriving in long-term wealth creation. No one ever received an award for riding markets substantially lower. Such is not a testament to resilience—it is an avoidable failure.
I Beat the S&P 500 Medallion
Outperforming the S&P 500 is often portrayed as the ultimate measure of investing success. However, data from the SPIVA U.S. Scorecard shows that approximately 85% of actively managed U.S. equity funds underperform their benchmarks over ten years. While not every manager underperforms yearly, and periods of outperformance exist, the persistent challenge highlights the difficulty of consistently beating the S&P 500.
Pursuing benchmark-beating returns can lead investors into dangerous territory. Studies in behavioral finance (Statman, 2000) show that investors chasing outperformance often engage in high-turnover strategies, excessive trading, and speculative bets. These behaviors introduce additional risks and higher transaction costs that erode potential gains. The result is that investors, while trying to “beat the index, ” consistently underperform over time. As noted in the 2024 Dalbar Research report:
As noted above, even the most simplistic of risk management strategies can improve returns over time while maintaining a focus on investment goals. Instead of fixating on beating the benchmark, focus on building a portfolio that aligns with your financial goals and personal risk tolerance. Ultimately, true investing success isn’t measured against a broad index. No one will ever give you an award for beating an index from one year to the next. However, they will measure your success by what matters most: whether you achieved your objectives, like securing a comfortable retirement or funding important goals.
Conclusion: Building a Smarter Path to Investing Success
To avoid the costly mistakes outlined above, investors must adopt a disciplined, process-driven approach to managing their portfolios. Sustainable investment success comes from understanding, not reacting to, market behavior. Here are the critical steps you should take:
-
First, embrace losses as part of the investment journey. Prune weak investments when they no longer fit your strategy, reallocating capital to stronger opportunities rather than waiting for recoveries that may never come.
-
Second, respect risk. Avoid equating bravery with excessive risk-taking. Build portfolios aligned with your personal financial goals and loss tolerance, focusing on diversification and asset valuation rather than speculative bets.
-
Third, redefine long-term investing. Remaining loyal to a poor investment out of hope wastes time and wealth. Maintain objectivity by reassessing whether each holding still meets your original investment thesis.
-
Fourth, implement active risk management. Use stop-loss strategies, periodic rebalancing, and technical indicators like the 40-week moving average to protect against significant drawdowns. Managing risk is about ensuring survival, not limiting success.
-
Finally, stop chasing the S&P 500. Focus instead on achieving your financial objectives with consistent, risk-adjusted returns. Outperformance is meaningless if you fail to meet real-world needs, like securing retirement income or building generational wealth.
Successful investing is not about winning arbitrary “awards.” It is about managing risk, preserving capital, and steadily compounding returns toward your goals. Ignore the noise, stay disciplined, and remember: no one hands out awards for reckless investing—only consequences.
-
-
Site: LifeNews
A new study has found that human populations may need a fertility rate of at least 2.7 children per woman — far higher than the long-accepted 2.1 — to reliably avoid long-term extinction.
The research, published April 30 in PLOS One and led by Takuya Okabe of Shizuoka University in Japan, challenges decades of demographic assumptions, Phys.org reported. Using mathematical models, the team examined how variations in fertility, mortality, and the likelihood that some adults never reproduce can significantly increase the risk of population decline — even when a society meets the traditional “replacement level” birth rate.
SUPPORT LIFENEWS! If you want to help fight abortion, please donate to LifeNews.com!
“Considering stochasticity in fertility and mortality rates, and sex ratios,” co-author Diane Carmeliza N. Cuaresma said, “a fertility rate higher than the standard replacement level is necessary to ensure sustainability of our population.”
The study highlights how smaller populations are especially vulnerable to these random demographic shifts, which can gradually eliminate entire family lineages. A slight increase in female births appears to mitigate this risk, possibly explaining why more girls tend to be born during times of extreme conditions such as war, famine, or upheaval — a phenomenon long noted by evolutionary scientists.
While the researchers do not predict imminent collapse for large developed nations, they caution that most individual family lines, along with their cultural and linguistic heritage, are likely to fade over time unless fertility rates rise.
LifeNews Note: Rachel Quackenbush writes for CatholicVote, where this column originally appeared.
The post Researchers Say Human Population at Critically Low Levels, Need More Babies to Survive appeared first on LifeNews.com.
-
Site: Mises InstituteTrump has even dubbed himself “a Tariff Man.” This is nothing new, however, his frequent claims regarding the US economy during the Gilded Age need scrutiny.
-
Site: Zero HedgeNetanyahu Stirs Fresh Controversy: Victory In Gaza Is Top Priority, Not HostagesTyler Durden Fri, 05/02/2025 - 13:00
According to fresh reporting in Haaretz, Israel is preparing tens of thousands of orders calling more reserve soldiers to active duty, amid an expected expansion of ground operations in the Gaza Strip.
But more reservists are increasingly needed as Israel's military once again becomes more engaged in places like Syria, Lebanon, the Golan Heights, and security crackdowns in the West Bank.
Via Reuters
The Haaretz report suggests that a surge of additional soldiers will free up more forces to focus efforts on defeating Hamas in Gaza.
One of the areas of expected new operations is the town of Muwasi on the Gaza coast. Israel is claiming that it has become a safe haven for Hamas, and that militants are hiding in what has become a sprawling tent city of the internally displaced, and so has to be cleared of all Palestinians.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has meanwhile unleashed fresh controversy related to these expanded operations. He essentially admitted that the remaining hostages are not the country's top priority, but the ultimate defeat of Hamas is.
"We have many objectives, many goals in this war. We want to bring back all of our hostages," Netanyahu said. "That is a very important goal. In war, there is a supreme objective. And that supreme objective is victory over our enemies. And that is what we will achieve," he added. He had issued the words at an Independence Day event in Jerusalem on Thursday.
This was enough to outrage families of the victims, who have been begging Israeli leaders to restart negotiations with Hamas, in hopes of brokering the freedom of the remaining captives.
The Hostages and Missing Families Forum issued a response to these words of Netanyahu. "Prime minister, the return of the hostages is not ‘less’ important – it is the supreme goal that should guide the government of Israel," a statement said. "The families of the hostages are concerned."
As for the remaining captives, Netanyahu addressed this is the same remarks, saying "We want to bring all our hostages home. We’ve so far brought back 147 alive, and 196 total," but that "There are another up to 24 alive, 59 total, and we want to return the living and the dead."
Netanyahu's description of goals in Gaza and what he prioritizes were echoed in prior remarks last week by hardline Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich in a CNN interview.
The war which has been on since the terror attacks of Oct.7, 2023 - has become deeply divisive among Israeli society:
Hundreds of Israelis walking in Tel Aviv tonight with photos of children killed in Gaza demanding to stop the attacks now. pic.twitter.com/XjDA9o6EIe
— Breaking the Silence (@BtSIsrael) April 26, 2025"We need to tell the truth — bringing back the hostages is not the most important goal. It is, of course, a very, very, very, very important goal," he began his comments. And there was a but...
"But anyone who wants to destroy Hamas and eliminate the possibility of another Oct. 7 must understand that in Gaza, there can’t be a situation where Hamas remains present and intact," he emphasized.
It's unknown how many hostages might still be alive. Family members worry that with each passing day and week, the chances of survival grow slim, also given the steady bombings and that it's an active war zone, also with little food and medicines.
-
Site: AsiaNews.itBorn into a mixed family with a Catholic father and a Hindu mother, he experienced firsthand and from an early age the difficulties and marginalisation outcasts face. He was able to study thanks to men of the Church who strengthened his faith and allowed him to discover his vocation. Hyderabad is a cosmopolitan, multicultural place with different languages. Proclaiming the Gospel is a 'challenge'.
-
Site: Henrymakow.comPlease send links and comments to hmakow@gmail.comThere is a new sheriff in town.RFK Jr. is ending the medical and food industries' exploitationof the American people.RFK Jr. Shatters The Measles Narrative With One Brilliant Point"We've had four measles deaths in this country in 20 years. We have 100,000 autism cases a year. We have 38% of our kids now are diabetic or pre-diabetic. That should be in the headlines," he said.The US now spends almost a trillion dollars a year on diabetes and metabolic disorder."By 2035, we're going to be spending a million dollars a year on autism. Autism in 1970 was 1 in 10,000 Americans. Today, it's 1 in 31. In California, it's 1 in every 20 kids--1 in every 12.5 boys," he said.-A "near extinction" event is planned consistent with my Illuminati 4: Genocide & War prediction.Catherine Austin Fitts: While the central bankers are building the control grid, they are also preparing for a near-extinction event to save themselvesFormer Bush administration official Catherine Austin Fitts joined Tucker Carlson to discuss how America's leaders gave up on the country in the 1990s, began stealing trillions and built a digital prison to control the American population. With digitising currencies, they are converting a currency system into a control system. The goal is to move the majority of people to a lower economic footprint.If the majority of the population becomes poorer, where is all the money going? One possible explanation, Austin Fitts says, is that it is being invested in underground bases and city infrastructure, potentially in preparation for a near-extinction event.---Former Congressman Norm Coleman, a Jew, Declares "the Masters of the Universe Are Jews."He said, "A majority or Gen Z have an unfavorable impression of Israel. And, my friends, I think the reason for that is that we're losing the digital war. They're getting their information from TikTok, and... and we're losing that war.""...And when you think about it, the Masters of the Universe are Jews! We've got Altman at OpenAI, we've got [Facebook founder Mark] Zuckerberg, we've got [Google founder] Sergey Brin, we've got a group across the board. Jan Koum, y'know, founded WhatsApp. It's us."As numerous polls show young Americans are increasingly skeptical of Israel - with a recent survey showing 71% of Democrats and 50% of Republicans under age 49 now hold an unfavorable view of Israel-IDF Deliberately Killed israelis on Oct 7, 2023 to justify Gaza genocide--Israel will not stop war until Palestinians displaced from Gaza and Syria partitioned.Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich reiterates call for 'hundreds of thousands' of Palestinians to be forcibly displaced from Gaza----Someone pays attention...Satanic Possession and the New World Order - Dr. Henry MakowThese excerpts present a conspiratorial view of global events, asserting that a satanic cult known as the Illuminati, primarily composed of Cabalist Jewish central bankers, controls the world.-Marty GOLD: Singh crashes NDP Party and takes his pension with him"Years of support for Trudeau's minority government until after he secured his Parliamentary pension soured voters on his sincerity.That sad result was replicated across the country for Singh, who finished third in his own riding and with many of his most radical far-left MPs, among them Matthew Green in Hamilton, Blake Desjarlais in Edmonton and Thompson's Niki Ashton in Churchill-Keewatinook Aski, will be hitting the unemployment line.Over the years, Singh milked the political process for everything he could, built his personal brand, condemned the Liberals while supporting their agenda, and voiced support for violent demonstrators and vile political movements taking over streets in our major cities. Singh delivered a tearful concession speech and resigned as party leader, but the cynics will say he's crying all the way to the bank."NDP and Liberals both belong to the international socialist - i.e. Communist-Transhumanism is a death cult; followers believe in salvation by digital technology instead of salvation by GodThe transhumanist dream is to live forever. Living forever in the digital cloud or the mainframe computer in the sky constitutes the transhumanists' religious doctrine. It is salvation by digital technology. Transhumanism is clearly a religion - indeed, a particular type of neo-Gnostic religion, Aaron Kheriaty says."It attracts adherents today - including educated, wealthy, powerful, culturally influential adherents - because it taps into unfulfilled, deeply religious aspirations and longings. Transhumanism is an ersatz substitute religion for a secular age," he said.--Lena Petrova - Chabad Jews Steal Ukraine's BirthrightZelensky is a US proxy charged with threatening Russia. Now the US is charging Ukraine for the cost of the war. Illuminati insist on making a profit while destroying you. Look at the COVID vaccines.-Germany designates rising far-right AfD party as 'extremist' groupReader claims they are Zionists--"Right up until 2014 (end of the Godless Gog-Magog alliance), the globalists had a marvellous scam in operation: "democracy".Here was the question for the voters at the polling station: Do you want this globalist, or that one?Populism ruined it all. Populism: ZIONIST SCAM. They just say what conservatives want to hear..........just like the Lenin scam of 1917. There is no political Messiah."--State Department Instructs Employees to Report Anti-Christian Bias"It is the policy of the United States, and the purpose of this order, to protect the religious freedoms of Americans and end the anti-Christian weaponization of government," Trump wrote in the order, which alleged that during the Biden administration, government officials "engaged in an egregious pattern of targeting peaceful Christians, while ignoring violent, anti-Christian offenses," such as bringing charges against people who demonstrated outside facilities that perform abortions.-When I was young, the word conscience was in common usage. "My conscience wouldn't let me do it."Is it my imagination, but we don't hear that word as much any more.--Michael Snyder---We Are Much Closer To A Major War With Iran, And Trump Warns That Anyone That Buys Iranian Oil "Will Not Be Allowed To Do Business With The United States Of America In Any Way, Shape, Or Form"This just happened, and it is absolutely huge. China is a major purchaser of Iranian oil. What will Trump do if the Chinese continue to buy oil from Iran?Will the Chinese "not be allowed to do business with the United States of America in any way, shape, or form"? If Trump really follows through on this, we are about to see some really dramatic changes. Just imagine what it would do to the global economy if we suddenly cut off all trade with China and all of the other nations that purchase oil from Iran.I believe that Trump is not bluffing, and that means that things are about to get very "interesting".--As wildfires rage across Israel for a second day, scorching over 5,000 acres near Jerusalem, public outrage is mounting over the government's failure to prepare for the disaster despite years of warnings.-Israeli drone targets aid ship bound for Gaza in international watersThe attack struck the ship's generator, igniting a fire and causing a hull breach that left it at risk of sinking-"Today is my sister's 30th birthday, thanks to your help I was able to buy the ingredients for this delicious dessert, and made it for her with all my love, bringing joy to her heart and to all of our hearts despite the pain, thank you from the bottom of my heart."A Way to Help Gaza-Fraud Rings Operating, But In Order To Break Up A Fraud Ring, It's Kind Of Like The Mafia"Elon Musk sat in the Roosevelt Room of the West Wing with the Daily Caller and a handful of other print reporters on Wednesday evening to reflect back on what DOGE has been able to accomplish as the Trump administration celebrated its first 100 days in office. As of Wednesday, DOGE says it has saved the American taxpayer $160 billion, which is equivalent to about $1,000 per taxpayer.-Tense debate over 'separatism' consumes Saskatchewan legislatureWestern separatism is opposed by many Westerners-Spain & Portugal Blackout Was a Test Run. These 5 Documents Prove What's ComingThe recent blackout across Spain, Portugal, and parts of France was not a random event, it was a test.https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/1kcde9i/spain_portugal_blackout_was_a_test_run_these_5/A stress test on the power grid, communications, and public behavior. They blamed it on "atmospheric vibrations," but behind the scenes, this is the exact scenario rehearsed by global institutions like the WEF, IMF, and World Bank.They are preparing for a global cyberattack, a staged collapse of banking, energy, and infrastructure; in order to roll out centralized digital ID, CBDCs, and full-spectrum control over society.Below are 5 official documents that lay the entire plan out, in their own words:Cyber Polygon (World Economic Forum)Summary: Cyber Polygon was a global simulation hosted by the WEF and major financial institutions to prepare for a coming "cyber pandemic" -- a digital crisis that would take down banks, power grids, and communication networks. The drill ends by promoting centralized digital control systems as the solution.2. Digital Identity: A Framework for Financial Services-Wiz Acquisition Puts Israeli Intelligence In Charge of Your Google Data by Alan MacleodGoogle recently announced it would acquire Israeli-American cloud security firm Wiz for $32 billion. The price tag -- 65 times Wiz's annual revenue -- has raised eyebrows and further solidified the close relationship between Google and the Israeli military.
-
Site: Zero Hedge'No Participation Trophies': Trump Revamps Performance Reviews For Top BureaucratsTyler Durden Fri, 05/02/2025 - 12:00
Authored by Philip Wegmann via RealClearPolitics,
Performance reviews are about to become much more difficult for the upper echelon of federal government employees.
The Trump administration will soon introduce rules to end what the Office of Personnel Management describes as an “everyone gets a trophy” culture permeating the federal workforce, RealClearPolitics is first to report.
The ranks of the Senior Executive Service, top bureaucrats serving throughout the government and across administrations, swelled to around 8,000 under President Biden. Most live in Washington, D.C. They typically earn an annual salary between $183,000 and $250,000. An overwhelming majority, 96%, according to an OPM memo, receive above-average performance ratings even as public trust in government continues to crater.
But standards will soon tighten. It is called “forced distribution.”
The new OPM rule limits the number of bureaucrats who can earn top ratings, a metric tied to promotions and end-of-the-year bonuses. It also eliminates Biden-era requirements that evaluated executives based on their promotion of diversity, equity, and inclusion.
The stated goal is instead an evaluation of job performance, not political ideology. Now only top performers, acting OPM director Chuck Ezell told RCP, will earn top performance rankings.
“The American people deserve a federal government led by executives who are held to the highest standards,” Ezell said. “This proposed rule restores accountability, rewards true excellence, and ensures senior leaders deliver real results. OPM is proud to take this important step to strengthen performance among the highest levels of the federal workforce.”
The elite of career civil servants, these senior employees are normally little noticed and non-controversial. Permanent bureaucracy has come under attack during the Trump administration, however, and the White House sees the top ranks of federal employees as the face of the so-called “deep state.”
“There are no participation trophies,” a White House official said of the new standards, telling RCP that from now on, trophies, in this case top-tier performance rankings, “are for winners.”
The new standards come as Trump continues his long march through the administrative state. His administration has already implemented rules to gut civil service protections for government employees perceived as undermining the White House agenda. Thousands of federal workers have been fired. Entire government agencies, in some cases, shuttered.
Critics accuse the White House of trying to politicize the federal workforce and of trying to remake the executive agencies in Trump’s image. The Senior Executives Association, a trade group for federal employees with an office in downtown D.C., previously balked at proposed reforms. The head of that organization, Marcus Hill, insisted that top bureaucrats had earned their jobs through merit “based on demonstrated competence, character and capability in their fields of expertise.”
But the administration argues that change is needed because a sclerotic establishment is undermining self-government. This is the mission of Elon Musk and his team at the Department of Government Efficiency.
“If the bureaucracy is in charge, then what meaning does democracy actually have?” Musk asked earlier this year while fielding questions from reporters in the Oval Office.
“If the people cannot vote and have their will be decided by their elected representatives,” he said while standing behind the Resolute Desk next to the seated president, “then we don’t live in a democracy.”
-
Site: Zero HedgeEuropean Union Continues Sabotaging Trump's Ukraine Peace EffortsTyler Durden Fri, 05/02/2025 - 11:40
The European Union at this point seems much more open about its willingness to sabotage Trump efforts toward achieving peace in Ukraine.
The EU's top diplomat Kaja Kallas has told the Financial Times in a fresh interview this week that the bloc will not recognize Russia's annexation of Crimea under any circumstances. Really, this should be the most obvious and 'easiest' concession to make, but alas Brussels is saying no!
Kaja Kallas, via European Parliament
The White House is seeking to pressure the Zelensky government to get to the negotiating table fast, and the quickest and easiest concession would be expected to center on letting go of Crimea, which Moscow declared part of the Russian Federation after a 2014 popular referendum.
"I can’t see that we are accepting these kind of things. But we can’t speak for America, of course, and what they will do," Kallas said. "On the European side, we have said this over and over again... Crimea is Ukraine."
"There are tools in the Americans’ hands that they can use to put the pressure on Russia to really stop this war," Kallas continued. "President Trump has said that he wants the killing to stop. He should put the pressure on the one who is doing the killing."
This has basically been the Ukrainian government's position all along as well. For this reason, she said Brussels and other European capitals are still focused on "working with the Americans and trying to convince them why the outcome of this war is also in their interest, that Russia doesn’t really get everything that it wants." But again, Crimea should be the easiest issue.
On the question of the scenario where Washington successfully resets relations with Moscow and eventually withdraws arms and intelligence support for Kiev, she said:
"It is clear that these types of discussions are going on in certain member states and maybe hopes that we don’t really have to support [Ukraine] any more," said Kallas, the former Estonian prime minister. "But it’s also a false hope, because if you look at Russia, that is investing more than 9 per cent of its GDP on the military, they will want to use it again."
Currently the US is reportedly seeking to convince Kiev and Europe of a de jure recognition of Russia's control over Crimea and de facto recognition of Russian areas of control in eastern Ukraine, based on a 'freeze' of battle lines.
Trump presidential special envoy for Ukraine and Russia Keith Kellogg told Fox News this week that Ukraine is ready to make territorial concessions, but wouldn't consider any ceded territory as a permanent situation.
"Not de jure forever, but de facto, because the Russians actually occupy that and they've agreed to that. They know that if they have a ceasefire in place, which means you sit on the ground that you currently hold, that's what they're willing to go to," Kellog said. "You have your line set, and they're willing to go there," Kellogg emphasized.
But it's clear the Kremlin sees this as an issue of sovereignty and permanence, given President Putin has described the four annexed territories and Crimea as "ours forever".
Zelensky has lately reiterated to reporters on the question of giving up Crimea, "There is nothing to talk about. This violates our Constitution. This is our territory, the territory of the people of Ukraine."
This was after late last month Vice President JD Vance made clear, "We’ve issued a very explicit proposal to both the Russians and the Ukrainians, and it’s time for them to either say yes or for the United States to walk away from this process."
Kaja Kallas, the grossly inept "Diplomatic Chief" of the EU lies through her teeth in Munich
— Chay Bowes (@BowesChay) February 16, 2025
She suggests Russian civilians haven't died in Donbass, Crimea, Belgorod, and Kursk. Thousands have.
The fact that EU and NATO cash / weapons have done the killing demands she lies pic.twitter.com/apwFAkKvpC"The only way to really stop the killing is for the armies to both put down their weapons, to freeze this thing and to get on with the business of actually building a better Russia and a better Ukraine," he said in April while traveling overseas to Asia.
It goes without saying that freezing the war now would certainly give Russian forces a huge advantage, given the immense territory in the East they now hold - and this seem precisely what Kiev and Europe are unwilling to accept.
-
Site: AsiaNews.itSingapore's unicameral legislature is set for renewal. A divided electorate could decree the end of the hegemony of the People's Action Party. Fears of instability are likely to affect the economy, while negotiations with the United States on tariffs are underway. In a country with an aging population, immigration remains an unresolved issue.
-
Site: AsiaNews.itFrom Turkey and Iran to the Philippines and Japan, International Workers' Day saw thousands of people take to the streets for workers' rights, often faced with violent clampdowns. Key demands include higher wages, social equity, and peace as well as criticism of global economic policies, especially Trump's tariffs. In Istanbul, hundreds are arrested; in Iran, teachers are beaten, while in Hong Kong, labour protest is now a fading memory.
-
Site: Zero HedgeNative-Born Workers Surge By Over 1 Million, Back To All-Time High, As Govt Employees TumbleTyler Durden Fri, 05/02/2025 - 11:25
For much of the past 4 years we dutifully reported, month after month, how the US labor market under the Biden administration "grew" almost entirely on the back of "foreign-born" workers, who - as we also first revealed and eventually was widely accepted - were primarily illegal aliens:
-
Wall Street Admits The Biggest Economic Shocker: All Jobs In The Past Year Have Gone To Illegal Aliens: June, 2024
More importantly, as we predicted at the start of 2024...
How is this not the biggest political talking point right now: since October 2019, native-born US workers have lost 1.4 million jobs; over the same period foreign-born workers have gained 3 million jobs. pic.twitter.com/Z5HVWmQ24C
— zerohedge (@zerohedge) January 15, 2024... the composition of the labor market would become one of the biggest political talking points, one which was hammered constantly by Trump in his political rallies and during his debate with Biden.
We bring this up because deep inside today's jobs report we got the best news yet: after literally flatlining in late 2019, having plunged during covid and barely recovering to its pre-covid levels, the number of native born workers is now back to its all time high, 132.228 million.
That's because in April, the number of native-born workers surged by just over 1 million, from 131.186 million to 132.228 million. Meanwhile, the number of foreign-born workers - who as we explained previously were mostly undocumented, or illegal, aliens - dropped by 410K from a record 32.225 million.
Or, as so many people have already said, this is what a majority of Americans voted for.
Actually, they voted for something else too: after hitting a record high in December, the last month of Biden's admin, the number of Federal government employees has declined for 4 consecutive months to the lowest level in over a year. Thank you DOGE.
So while there has been pain, and there will be a lot more pain, America is finally returning to some semblance of a long-term viable trendline.
-
Site: Zero HedgeTwo Americans Charged In Operating International Child Exploitation RingTyler Durden Fri, 05/02/2025 - 11:20
Authored by Rachel Acenas via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),
Two leaders of a child exploitation network known as 764 have been arrested, federal officials announced on Wednesday.
764 leader Prasan Nepal in a booking photo. Courtesy of Guilford County Sheriff's Office
Prasan Nepal, 20, of High Point, North Carolina, was arrested on April 22 in North Carolina. Leonidas Varagiannis, 21, was arrested on April 29 in Greece on an international warrant.
Both defendants face charges of operating an international child exploitation enterprise, marking a major takedown of an operation that targets innocent children, according to FBI Director Kash Patel.
“This is a significant case in our renewed mission to crack down on child sexual exploitation and abuse—heinous crimes that no child or parent should ever be faced with,” Patel said on Wednesday in a statement on social media platform X.
The defendants allegedly recruited others to exploit children and coordinated the operation through encrypted messaging apps.
Varagiannis has denied the allegations. He appeared in court on Wednesday before an appellate prosecutor and opposed extradition, according to Greek judicial authorities and his lawyer.
“Throughout the period during which the alleged offenses took place, he was residing in Greece. Therefore, Greek law and courts have jurisdiction over the case, and his extradition is explicitly prohibited,” his lawyer Xanthippi Moysidou said.
Nepal is currently in the Guilford County, North Carolina, jail on a federal hold and has a public defender.
Federal prosecutors allege the two men targeted children as young as 13 years old from late 2020 through early 2025 across multiple jurisdictions through the 764 criminal enterprise.
764 is a network of online groups that “methodically target and exploit minors and other vulnerable individuals,” according to a public service announcement posted by the FBI on March 6.
“These networks use threats, blackmail, and manipulation to coerce or extort victims into producing, sharing, or live-streaming acts of self-harm, animal cruelty, sexually explicit acts, and/or suicide,” the FBI said.
The material is used as leverage to force victims to perform acts of violence and even self-harm. The network also engages in swatting and harassment to silence its victims.
A criminal complaint unsealed on Wednesday in the District of Columbia shows examples of online manuals used by the defendants to instruct others on how to groom and extort minors. The guides taught others specifically how to target vulnerable children online, according to the affidavit, and ultimately coerced and threatened them into creating degrading content.
‘The allegations in this case are not only disturbing, they are also every parent’s nightmare,’ U.S. Attorney Edward R. Martin Jr. said in a Department of Justice statement on April 29.
The case was brought as part of Project Safe Childhood, a nationwide initiative to combat the epidemic of child sexual exploitation and abuse. The DOJ launched the initiative in May 2006.
The initiative utilizes federal, state, and local resources to locate, arrest, and prosecute those who exploit children through the internet. It also aims to identify and rescue victims.
Attorney General Pam Bondi on Wednesday called for swift justice in the case.
“These defendants are accused of orchestrating one of the most heinous online child exploitation enterprises we have ever encountered—a network built on terror, abuse, and the deliberate targeting of children,” Bondi said in a statement. “We will find those who exploit and abuse children, prosecute them, and dismantle every part of their operation.”
Varagiannis will remain in custody until a court of appeals rules on the U.S. extradition request.
If convicted, both defendants face a maximum penalty of life in prison.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
From NTD News
-
Site: LifeNews
President Donald Trump on May 1 established the Religious Liberty Commission through an executive order, in an effort to guarantee the religious rights of Americans. The announcement coincided with the annual National Day of Prayer.
“The Commission is tasked with producing a comprehensive report on the foundations of religious liberty in America, strategies to increase awareness of and celebrate America’s peaceful religious pluralism, current threats to religious liberty, and strategies to preserve and enhance protections for future generations,” a White House fact sheet states.
The commission will focus on parental rights, school choice, conscience protections, attacks on houses of worship, free speech for religious entities, and institutional autonomy, the White House adds.
SUPPORT LIFENEWS! If you want to help fight abortion, please donate to LifeNews.com!
The commission will also be responsible for advising the White House Faith Office and the Domestic Policy Council on policies regarding religious freedom by recommending legislative and executive measures to protect First Amendment rights.
Trump appointed Bishop Robert Barron of the Diocese of Winona-Rochester to serve on the commission.
Bishop Barron thanked Trump in an X post, writing, “Freedom of religion in our country has been a central concern of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops for decades, and I see my task as bringing the perspective of Catholic social teaching to bear as the Commission endeavors to shape public policy in this matter.”
The Daily Wire reports that Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick will serve as the committee chair and Dr. Ben Carson will serve as vice chair. Besides Bishop Barron, other commission members include Ethics and Public Policy Center President Ryan Anderson, Cardinal Timothy Dolan, Pastor Franklin Graham, Pastor Paula White, Gibson Dunn partner Allyson Ho, and Rabbi Meier Soloveichik.
LifeNews Note: Grace Porto writes for CatholicVote, where this column originally appeared.
The post Trump Establishes Religious Liberty Commission, Puts Pro-Life Advocates in Charge appeared first on LifeNews.com.
-
Site: LifeNews
President Trump has announced his first judicial nominee of his second term and she fought in court to defend an abortion ban that saves babies.
Trump announced late Thursday night that he would nominate Whitney Hermandorfer to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit. She is his first federal judicial nomination since returning to the White House in January.
Hermandorfer heads up a litigation unit for the Tennessee Attorney General’s Office. In that role, she has led major cases involving constitutional law – including defending the state’s abortion ban in court from a challenge from the Planned Parenthood abortion business.
SUPPORT LIFENEWS! If you want to help fight abortion, please donate to LifeNews.com!
As LifeNews reported last April, Hermandorfer countere arguments from the abortion giant, which said that it shouldn’t face any limits on abortions or oversight from the state when it comes to killing babies. Hermandorfer said that’s not how that works.
The Tennessee Attorney General’s office argued in front of a three judge panel and asked the judges to dismiss a lawsuit filed against the ban by abortion activists seeking to weaken it.
“Plaintiffs very much, and this is a shared policy view by many in the medical profession, do not want any sort of governmental scrutiny on their use, on their medical decision-making,” Hermandorfer explained. “And that’s not been how things have worked in the abortion context.”
Those behind the lawsuit wanted to be able to kill babies in abortions just because they’re disabled.
Trump praised his judicial nominee, saying she would uphold the rule of law.
“Whitney has been serving the Great People of Tennessee, in the Attorney General’s Office, where she has strongly litigated in Court to protect Citizens from Federal Government Overreach,” Trump wrote on Truth Social,” praising her accolades and prior clerkships with prominent originalist justices.
Trump noted Hermandorfer previously clerked for Supreme Court Justices Samuel Alito and Amy Coney Barrett, as well as then-Judge Brett Kavanaugh on the D.C. Circuit and U.S. District Judge Richard Leon.
“She has a long history of working for Judges and Justices who respect the RULE OF LAW, and protect our Constitution,” said the president.
The post Trump’s First Judicial Nominee of 2nd Term Defended Abortion Ban in Court appeared first on LifeNews.com.
-
Site: LES FEMMES - THE TRUTH
-
Site: Euthanasia Prevention Coalition
The following opinion article was published by Kelsi Sheren on her substack on May 1, 2025.
Kelsi Sheren
By Kelsi SherenYour paying to kill your neighbours.
Do you honestly think the government would let something like a recession interfere with one of its most profitable industries? Death is recession proof. Death is profitable and in Canada, death is generously funded with YOUR tax dollars. We’ve been conditioned to look away, convinced this is about dignity, compassion, and personal choice. Canada is the “free people society” where we can have anything! but peel back the layers, and you’ll find something so dark, so sinister and anything but compassion. A slick government-funded death industry propped up by grants, lobbyists, and carefully sanitized bureaucratic language.
I've had some time since the election to really sit with what just happened and honestly, I'm still dumbfounded by the collective decision made by those who voted Liberal. But instead of just stewing in disbelief, I wanted to dig deeper and confront what we're truly seeing here.
Canada feels like it's trapped in a bizarre, decade-long abusive relationship with its own government, a toxic cycle reminiscent of Stockholm syndrome. Since Canadians once again chose to re-elect a Liberal government, it’s important that we tell everyone know what they just co-signed.
Most of you reading my work already know my mission: exposing uncomfortable truths and confronting the issues plaguing Canada and the world. Right now and for the foreseeable future my focus is the disturbing expansion of the pro death movement and MAiD (Medical Assistance in Dying). This issue hit’s close to home for many reasons, and I thought you’d all like to know where a decent amount of your hard earned money is going. Even if you're someone who believes in MAiD, you owe it to yourself to understand what's really happening isn’t some beautiful thing, this isn't compassion.
It’s commodification.
It’s singular purpose?
Normalizing and expanding state-sanctioned death.
Yes, killing.
As a form of healthcare.
KILLING.
Let’s look at the MAiD industrial complex and where your money really goes and who is actually profiting from it.
Dying With Dignity Canada (DWDC)
Far from grassroots, this influential pro-euthanasia, pro death, pro giving up group received $204,655 in 2021 and $222,077 in 2020 directly from the government, your tax money. Nearly half a million dollars funnelled into lobbying and advocacy aimed at expanding death.
Not for mental health
Not for supportive housing
Not for palliative care
Just straight propaganda convincing Canadians they should die.
Canadian Association of MAiD Assessors & Providers (CAMAP)
The Liberal government handed CAMAP $3.3 million to develop MAiD training programs. Sit on this one for a second. MILLIONS spent to build a pipeline of “providers” incentivized to say "yes" to killing. Healthcare has become an industry not unlike the military industrial complex but designed as “healthcare” Geared to maximize profit by scaling up the practice of killing. More killers, more deaths, more efficiency—and yes, horrifyingly, more profit.
MAiDHouse …..yes a whole building. 2 actually. 1 in Victoria BC and 1 in Toronto. Yes, this exists. A supposed "charity," explicitly established in 2019 to facilitate KILLING. No hospice care, no healing programs just a carefully crafted, boutique environment dedicated entirely to death, financed by your money.
Imagine for a minute if even a fraction of these millions went toward genuine solutions, mental health resources, veteran support, trauma recovery, or housing initiatives.
Think about how many lives could have been transformed or saved. But there’s no profit in healing, is there? Here’s what Canadians who just don’t understand, your taxes actively fund organizations dedicated to facilitating death over life for vulnerable populations. Are you aware that while you or loved ones struggle to access timely mental health care, taxpayer-funded organizations actively present death as the quicker alternative?
Do you know they’re expanding MAiD for mental illness only in 2027 and lobbying to include eligibility to “mature” minors … these are your children.
This isn’t conspiracy, it’s our reality. It’s Canada’s quietly expanding euthanasia empire, thriving because of YOUR taxes. If I were you. I’d start asking why is accessing euthanasia easier than getting trauma therapy?
Why are we fast-tracking death while mental health care remains underfunded and inaccessible? Why are millions spent training killers instead of investing in supportive housing, poverty reduction, or hospice care? WHY!!! do we call it “dying with dignity” when people often choose death out of poverty, neglect, and untreated emotional pain?
Here’s the real answer.
HEALING IS COSTLY.
Allowing or encouraging them to die is cheap.
This isn’t about “personal dignity” or compassion. It's calculated hopelessness. It's about quietly removing individuals deemed too expensive or burdensome, all disguised as mercy and compassion.
It’s state-approved despair, neatly packaged for public acceptance. You're being sold a narrative carefully crafted to feel compassionate, supported by so-called charities, and bankrolled by you, the good, nice taxpayer.
WAKE UP.
You're funding a death cult, maybe not by choice, but definitely by default. Here’s the thing, in my coaching practice I learned quickly that once you become aware of a behaviour you now have the chance to change something.
I’ve now made you, the readers aware of what your funding
What are you going to do about it?
Demand that your tax dollars fund life, not death. Start asking the hard questions. Demand accountability. Demand transparency. Follow your money.
Because if we remain silent, the next expansion might target someone you love.
Or worse, it will be you. -
Site: LifeNews
Today marks the one-year anniversary of the enforcement of Florida’s Heartbeat Act. This piece of legislation signed by Governor Ron DeSantis in April 2023 protects preborn children in Florida after six weeks’ gestation. Supporters of legal abortion were quick to oppose the law, placing Amendment 4 on the November 2024 ballot.
The amendment would have placed legal abortion in Florida’s state constitution. However, strong vocal leadership by DeSantis and pro-life leaders around the Sunshine State played a key role in the defeat of Amendment 4 this past November.
Even though Florida’s Heartbeat Act is only one year old, very solid data from the state show that is has already saved thousands of lives. Even though the Heartbeat Act was in effect for only part of 2024, the number of abortions performed in Florida fell by over 12,000 that year. Furthermore, recent birth data provide additional evidence that the Heartbeat Act has saved lives. The number of babies born in Florida from December 2024 to March 2025 has increased by 1,700 since the equivalent period a year ago. This means that the Florida Heartbeat Act is saving over 400 babies every month.
SUPPORT LIFENEWS! If you want to help fight abortion, please donate to LifeNews.com!
Overall, this adds to the body of research that shows that heartbeat acts reduce the incidence of abortion and save lives. Data from Texas show that after a heartbeat act there took effect in September 2021, the number of abortions performed in the Lone Star State immediately fell by over 60 percent. Furthermore, three separate studies analyzing Texas birth data have shown that the Texas Heartbeat Act has resulted in over 1,000 more children being born every month. Overall, Governor DeSantis, Florida Republicans, and Sunshine State pro-life leaders deserve credit for their efforts in both enacting and defending Florida’s Heartbeat Act.
LifeNews Note: Michael J. New is an assistant professor at the Busch School of Business at The Catholic University of America and is an associate scholar at the Charlotte Lozier Institute. Follow him on Twitter @Michael_J_New
The post Florida Heartbeat Law Saves 12,000 Babies From Abortions During Its First Year appeared first on LifeNews.com.
-
Site: Ron Paul Institute - Featured Articles
(Photo: journalist Fatima Hassouna, murdered by Israel)
As I sat in church last Sunday, before the service started, I thought maybe I read too much.
I wish I had not read about Mohammed Hegazy, a seven-year-old Palestinian boy who was blinded by an Israeli grenade that blew up in his face as he played outside his home which is now rubble.
His father said he used to smile all the time. “Now we rarely see him smiling. He is having difficulty interacting with people due to his blindness and the psychological trauma he suffers,”
The father added: “He is constantly clinging to me and afraid to be separated from me, even more than a moment.”
More than 17,000 of those killed in Gaza during the past year and a half have been children under 14 years of age. Some four to five times that number have been wounded, many very seriously.
There is something wrong with anyone who does not think all this killing, maiming and blinding of little children is not horrific. And most of it has been done by Israeli soldiers using billions of dollars worth of American bombs, shells and weaponry paid for by American taxpayers.
I wish I had not read about Hossan Shabat,23, a young journalist who was killed by the Israeli military in late March. He had a premonition and wrote shortly before his death the following: “When all this began, I was only 21 years old—a college student with dreams like everyone else.”
He added: “I documented the horrors in northern Gaza minute by minute, determined to show the world the truth they tried to bury. I slept on pavements…anywhere I could. Each day was a battle for survival. I endured hunger for months, yet I never left my peoples’ side.”
At least 208 unarmed journalists have been killed in this one-sided slaughter. Shabat ended with this plea: “I ask you now: Do not let the world look away. Keep fighting. Keep telling our stories—until Palestine is free.”
I wish I had not read about Fatima Hassouna, 24, who also had a premonition and was killed by an Israeli airstrike a few days before she was to be married.
She was a photojournalist who was killed in mid-April along with nine members of her family the day after it was announced that a documentary she made about her life in Gaza at the Cannes Film Festival this month.
She had written on social media that she wanted “a death the world would hear.”
On April 19, 36 members of the Board of Deputies of British Jews criticized what‘ they called this “most extreme of Israeli governments.”
Their letter said: “Silence is seen as support for policies and actions that run contrary to our Jewish values. Led by the families of the hostages, hundreds of thousands of Israelis are demonstrating on the streets against the return to war. We stand with them. We stand against the war. We acknowledge and mourn the loss of Palestinian life.”
Before he became President, Mr. Trump criticized the war in Iraq. Last year, he criticized the Biden Administration for bombing Yemen. He said as President he would end the war in Ukraine. He said recently that he wanted to cut the U.S. defense budget in half.
A few days ago, his Defense Department proudly announced it had carried out 750 bombing raids against Yemen on behalf of Israel. The Israeli military has expanded its wars to the West Bank, Lebanon and Syria, killing thousands more. These wars are creating many more enemies for the U.S.
President Trump received approximately $100 million for his campaign and another $100 million for his Inauguration, according to press reports, from Miriam Adelson, widow of a Jewish multi-billlionaire, apparently for a promise of total support for the Netanyahu government in Israel.
George D. O’Neill, Jr. writing in The American Conservative Magazine for April 16, summed things up best: “When did Jesus say it was acceptable to starve the poor, slaughter women and children, while turning a blind eye to the suffering of the weak? The answer, of course, is never. Yet for years, a vocal strain of American Christian Zionist leaders have supported policies that do precisely that—enabling the starvation and slaughter of Palestinians while underwriting broader wars that have decimated ancient Christian communities across the Middle East. How did we arrive at a place where those who claim to follow the Prince of Peace justify such unchristian horrors.”
-
Site: Zero HedgePre-Tariff Surge In Aircraft Orders Sends US Durable Goods Orders To Record High In MarchTyler Durden Fri, 05/02/2025 - 10:10
While Apple's Tim Cook was adamant on the call last night that he had seen no 'pull forward' of demand due to the tariffs, it seems every other firm in the US did as Durable Goods Orders soared in March (final print this morning at +9.2% MoM)...
Source: Bloomberg
However, Core Durable Goods (ex Transports) was unchanged MoM - suggesting considerable front-running of tariffs for planes and autos...
Source: Bloomberg
US Factory Orders rose 4.3% MoM (slightly less than the +4.5% expected) - a big jump
Source: Bloomberg
And like with Durable Goods, Core Factory orders (ex Transports) actually fell 0.2% MoM...
Source: Bloomberg
The surge in orders was largely driven by a 139% MoM spike in non-defense aircraft and parts...
Source: Bloomberg
Which pushed total orders to a new all-time record-high...
Source: Bloomberg
The question is - what happens in April - post Liberation Day?
-
Site: Mises InstituteA past article, presenting a “libertarian” viewpoint of nuclear weapons, has two choices, but pointedly leaves out a third choice: nuclear disarmament. According to Murray Rothbard, disarmament is the only true moral choice and also the most practical.
-
Site: Mises InstituteA past article, presenting a “libertarian” viewpoint of nuclear weapons, has two choices, but pointedly leaves out a third choice: nuclear disarmament. According to Murray Rothbard, disarmament is the only true moral choice and also the most practical.
-
Site: Mises InstituteAs egg prices rise, the Usual Progressive Suspects claim it is due to monopoly power by egg producers, calling for government intervention. However, the real reason
-
Site: Steyn OnlineProgramming note: Join me tonight for the launch of The Mark Steyn Club's eighth-birthday audio adventure in Tales for Our Time - and then tomorrow, Saturday, for the latest episode of our Serenade Radio weekend music show, On the Town. The latter
-
Site: Steyn OnlineWelcome to the seventieth audio entertainment in our series Tales for Our Time. That's right: our seventieth. Never thought these capers would prove that popular, but it seems they do, and month by month we've built a spectacular archive that runs the
-
Site: Ron Paul Institute - Featured ArticlesBritain’s Coalition of the Willing Decides, Upon Reflection, That it’s unwilling to fight in Ukraine
The UK mainstream media has puffed up British military might and fortitude since the war in Ukraine began. Now it turns out that Britain would struggle to send 5000 troops to Ukraine in a so called “deterrence force.” Policy thinkers in Whitehall desperately need to engage their brains and reach for peace.
In a remarkable turn of events, the Times Newspaper of London published an article of 29 April in which it said Europe would struggle to put 25,000 troops on the ground in Ukraine. This from the same newspaper that offered a bizarre eulogy just eighteen days ago about Britain’s “crucial role” in directing Ukraine’s failed counter-offensive in 2023.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer has actively sought a role for himself, bringing divergent US and European policies closer on the conduct of the war and on plans for peace. To much fanfare, at the March 2 Lancaster House Summit, he announced a “coalition of the willing.”
The idea emerged that such a coalition might deploy a peacekeeping force to Ukraine after a future ceasefire. Among other things, this force – comprising European and not American troops – would “defend a deal in Ukraine” and “guarantee peace afterwards.” Many meetings were held since that time, in Paris and in London, to explore the details.
The coalition had four objectives. To keep military aid flowing into Ukraine and apply further pressure on Russia through sanctions, to maintain Ukraine’s sovereignty and participation in peace talks (an obvious point), to boost Ukraine’s defensive capabilities after a peace deal and to deploy the so called ‘coalition of the willing’ to maintain the peace.
No one, including Starmer, has articulated a clear strategy to guide these objectives. On the contrary, they seem to underpin a continuance of the war, not its cessation.
If we look at them in turn, keeping military aid flowing into Ukraine and applying more sanctions on Russia will most likely prolong the war, not end it. No one has articulated what the incentive would be for Russia to sue for peace on the basis on the further militarisation of Ukraine, and in the face of additional sanctions. This objective has clearly been driven by the Ukrainian side. Economically, barely a day goes by without Zelensky, Yermak or someone else in the Ukrainian power vertical calling for more sanctions on Russia, at a time when the US press for an end to the conflict. Indeed, Ukraine was calling for more sanctions on Russia in the days before the war’s commencement. On many occasions, I have presented analysis showing how Russia has constantly found ways to adapt to sanctions and illustrated how more sanctions would have no significant economic impact. Like giving Ukraine more weapons, sanctions would only disincentive efforts at peace, by emboldening Russia to continue fighting.
Even a casual observer might note that the plan to boost Ukraine’s defensive capabilities after a peace plan would amount to wholescale rearmament, running counter to any longer-term peace process. In any case, no one has explained why this rearmament would be needed. Surely, if peace is the way forward, then both sides would gradually and in small steps stand down their forces and reduce their alert state. I wouldn’t suggest that Ukraine dissolves its army on day one. However, with 800,000 personnel, Ukraine already has a bigger army than any other European NATO ally except for Turkey.
Further, Ukraine has received over one hundred and twenty billion dollars of military aid in the three years since the war started, that’s not far short of Britain’s annual defence budget for two years. What additional defensive capabilities would they need? And, more importantly, who would pay for it? The USA categorically isn’t going to pay for this for at least the next four years under President Trump.
The European Union will almost certainly fail in its bid to boost its own defence spending by $800bn under von der Leyen’s Rearm plan. That would impose such massive spending increases on countries like France and Italy that it would be political suicide domestically for their governments to do so. Ukraine already cannot afford to keep its military at its currently bloated size after war ends, without massive injections of European money that simply isn’t available. Where will the money come from to rearm Ukraine? Answer, nowhere.
Which brings us back to the peacekeeping, or deterrence force idea, and the shocking revelation that European nations including Britain don’t even have enough available troops to deliver upon that commitment at any scale. In March, in the afterglow of the Lancaster House Summit, even Conservative politicians hailed Starmer as a modern-day Winston Churchill, standing up against tyranny in Europe. A quick reminder here that Winston Churchill oversaw the mobilisation of almost six million British troops to fight in World War II. Starmer is struggling to muster five thousand for Ukraine.
The idea of a European peacekeeping force in Ukraine has always, in any case, been a non-starter given Russia’s long-standing and expressed rejection of the notion of NATO forces on the line of control. When Russia pointed this out, and following pressure from the US government on Britain, the peacekeeping proposal was watered down to a “deterrence force.” The idea here was that, rather than being close to the line of control, coalition of the willing troops might deploy to far away spots in the west of Ukraine, just in case they were needed, to deter a theoretical Russian breach of any peace deal. Today, if any European troops can be spared, then they would only deploy to deliver training to Ukraine’s army.
This state of affairs is beyond embarrassing. We have fallen all too frequently in Britain into the habit of serving up policy soundbites for a willing pro-war media establishment, before getting our policy thinking in order. We do this before discussing our plans with the Americans, who are in the driving seat in the west on plans for peace in Ukraine. At no time, do we appear to assess the risks associated with our ideas, or consider the likely and, in almost every case, entirely predictable Russian response. Nor, perhaps, even engage in dialogue with Russia to negotiate the art of the possible, exploring scope from both sides to reach compromise. A proposal that President Macron should act as Europe’s point person with President Putin has come to nothing. Instead, we stumble, with great self-importance, from one idiotic idea to another, announcing them at every stage as huge breakthroughs in our collective resolve to defeat Russia. Until the moment, finally, when, with not even an ounce of self-awareness, we admit that, upon reflection, it won’t work.
Surely, now, we must find someone in Whitehall to engage their brain, pull on their grown up trousers, engage with both sides to the conflict, and finally reach for peace?
Reprinted with permission from Strategic Culture Foundation.
-
Site: Ron Paul Institute - Featured Articles
“One of the most essential branches of English liberty is the freedom of one’s house. A man’s house is his castle.”
—James Otis, Revolutionary War activist, on the Writs of Assistance, 1761What the Founders rebelled against—armed government agents invading homes without cause—we are now being told to accept in the so-called name of law and order.
Imagine it: it’s the middle of the night. Your neighborhood is asleep. Suddenly, your front door is splintered by battering rams. Shadowy figures flood your home, screaming orders, pointing guns, threatening violence. You and your children are dragged out into the night—barefoot, in your underwear, in the rain.
Your home is torn apart. Your valuables seized. Your sense of safety, demolished.
But this isn’t a robbery by lawless criminals.
This is what terror policing looks like in Trump’s America: raids by night, flashbangs at dawn, mistaken identities, and shattered lives.
On April 24, 2025, in Oklahoma City, 20 heavily armed federal agents from ICE, the FBI, and DHS kicked in the door of a home where a woman and her three daughters—all American citizens—were sleeping. They were forced out of bed at gunpoint and made to wait in the rain while agents ransacked the house, confiscating their belongings.
It was the wrong house. The wrong family.
There were no apologies. No compensation. No accountability.
This is the new face of American policing, and it’s about to get so much worse thanks to the President Trump’s latest executive order, which aims to eliminate federal oversight and empower local law enforcement to act with impunity.
Titled “Strengthening and Unleashing America’s Law Enforcement to Pursue Criminals and Protect Innocent Citizens,” the executive order announced on April 28, 2025, removes restraints on police power, offers enhanced federal protections for officers accused of misconduct, expands access to military-grade equipment, and nullifies key oversight provisions from prior reform efforts.
Trump’s supporters have long praised his efforts to deregulate business and government under the slogan of “no handcuffs.” But when that logic is applied to law enforcement, the result isn’t freedom—it’s unchecked power.
What it really means is no restraints on police power—while the rest of us are left with fewer rights, less recourse, and a Constitution increasingly ignored behind the barrel of a gun.
This isn’t just a political shift. It’s a constitutional unraveling.
These aren’t abstract freedoms—they’re the bedrock of the Bill of Rights: the Fourth Amendment’s shield against warrantless searches, the Fifth Amendment’s promise of due process, and the First Amendment’s guarantee that we may speak, protest, and petition without fear of state retaliation.
Yet the build-up of the police state didn’t begin with Trump. What he has done is seize upon decades of bipartisan failure—and strip away the last remaining restraints.
For years, under both Republican and Democratic administrations, policing in America has grown more militarized, aggressive, and unaccountable. At times, there were modest attempts to rein in the worst excesses—like curbing the flow of military surplus equipment to local police—but these efforts were short-lived, inconsistent, and easily undone.
Trump’s executive order doesn’t just abandon those reforms. It bulldozes the guardrails. It hands law enforcement a blank check: more weapons, more power, and fewer consequences.
The result is not safety. It’s state-sanctioned violence.
It’s a future in which no home is safe, no knock is required, and no officer is ever held accountable.
That future is already here.
Just a few days before Trump signed the order, that reality played out in Oklahoma City when ICE, FBI, and DHS agents stormed the wrong home and terrorized a mother and her daughters.
Unfortunately, this is not an isolated incident.
In the 30 years since the first federal Crime Bill helped militarize local police forces, the use of SWAT teams has exploded. What was once a rare tactic for hostage situations is now used tens of thousands of times a year, often for nonviolent offenses or mere suspicion. These raids leave behind broken doors, traumatized children, and, too often, dead bodies. And yet, when families seek justice, they’re met with a legal wall called qualified immunity.
Under this doctrine, courts excuse even blatant misconduct by law enforcement unless an almost identical case has already been ruled unconstitutional. It’s legal sleight of hand—a get-out-of-jail-free card for government agents who trample on the Constitution.
We’ve entered an era in which federal agents can destroy your home, traumatize your family, and violate the Fourth Amendment with impunity. And the courts have said: that’s just how it works.
More than 80,000 SWAT raids now occur annually in the United States, most of them for nonviolent offenses like drug possession or administrative code violations.
Many are botched. Few are ever investigated.
In Martin v. United States, now before the Supreme Court, a heavily armed FBI SWAT team mistakenly stormed a Georgia home—armed with rifles, clad in tactical gear, and deploying a flashbang grenade—causing the family inside, with a 7-year-old son, to fear they were being burglarized.
The agents were supposed to raid a gang suspect’s house. Instead, they relied on faulty GPS and ended up at the wrong address, a block away from the intended target.
Only after detaining the family—forcing one family member onto the bedroom floor at gunpoint, and then pointing a gun in the mother’s face—did the officers realize their mistake.
The Rutherford Institute, alongside the National Police Accountability Project, filed an amicus brief urging the Court to deny qualified immunity for the agents. But if history is any guide, justice may prove elusive.
Just last year, the Court refused to hold a SWAT team leader accountable for raiding the wrong house, wrecking the wrong home, and terrorizing an innocent family.
In Jimerson v. Lewis, the SWAT team ignored clear differences between the actual target house and the Jimerson residence—missing house numbers, architectural mismatches, a wheelchair ramp where none should have been—and still received qualified immunity.
These rulings aren’t exceptions—they reflect a growing doctrine of unaccountability enshrined by the courts and now supercharged by the Trump administration.
Trump wants to give police even more immunity.
Brace yourselves for a new era of lawless policing.
President Trump’s call for a new crime bill that would further insulate police from liability, accountability and charges of official misconduct could usher in a new era of police brutality, lawlessness and the reckless deployment of lethal force on unarmed civilians.
This is how the rights of ordinary Americans get trampled under the boots of unchecked power.
Even when SWAT commanders disregard warrants, ignore addresses, and terrorize innocent families, the courts shield them from consequences.
These SWAT raids have become a thinly veiled, court-sanctioned excuse to let heavily armed police crash through doors in the dead of night. Too often, they’re marked by incompetence, devastation, and death—leaving a trail of broken homes and broken lives, while law enforcement escapes accountability.
There was a time in America when a person’s home was a sanctuary, protected by the Fourth Amendment from unlawful searches and seizures.
That promise is dead.
We have returned to the era of the King’s Writ—blanket search powers once used by British soldiers to invade colonial homes without cause. As James Otis warned in 1761, such writs “annihilate the privilege” of privacy and due process, allowing agents of the state to enter homes “when they please.”
Trump’s new executive order revives this tyranny in modern form: armored vehicles, night raids, no-knock warrants, federal immunity. It empowers police to act without restraint, and it rewards those who brutalize with impunity.
Even more alarming, the order sets the stage for future legislation that could effectively codify qualified immunity into federal law, making it nearly impossible for victims of police violence to sue.
This is how constitutional protections are dismantled—not in one dramatic blow, but in a thousand raids, a thousand broken doors, a thousand courts that look the other way.
Let’s not pretend we’re safe. Who will protect us from the police when the police have become the law unto themselves?
The war on the American people is no longer metaphorical.
Government agents can now kick in your door without warning, shoot your dog, point a gun at your children, and suffer no legal consequences—so long as they claim it was a “reasonable” mistake. They are judge, jury, and executioner.
With Trump’s new order, the architecture of a police state is no longer theoretical. It is being built in real time. It is being normalized.
It’s not just the poor, the marginalized, or the criminalized who should be afraid. It’s every homeowner, every parent, every citizen who still believes in the Bill of Rights.
Nowhere is this threat more visible than in the unholy alliance between ICE and militarized police forces.
This is where the danger deepens: when ICE and SWAT join forces, no one is safe.
This is more than just a problem of policing—it’s the convergence of two of the most dangerous arms of the modern security state: the merging of federal immigration enforcement with militarized domestic operations, creating a volatile blend of ICE lawlessness and militarized SWAT-style brute force.
Together, they’ve created a government apparatus that acts first and justifies itself later, if at all.
What used to be separate spheres—immigration enforcement and local policing—have now, under the pretense of national security, merged into a seamless operation of nighttime raids, heavy weaponry, blacked-out uniforms, and unmarked vehicles.
Armed federal agents, often operating in plainclothes and without clearly presented warrants, storm homes in the dead of night.
The distinction between a SWAT raid and an ICE operation has disappeared.
ICE agents—often masked, plainclothes, and operating without judicial oversight—are executing aggressive home invasions indistinguishable from SWAT team raids. These officers operate in secret, detaining individuals without clear warrants, sometimes without charges, and often without informing families of where their loved ones have been taken.
This alliance of ICE and SWAT has turned the American home into a battlefield, especially for those deemed politically inconvenient or “suspect” by the state.
These raids aren’t limited to those suspected of crimes.
Legal residents, asylum seekers, and even U.S. citizens have found themselves disappeared under vague claims of national security or immigration violations.
It is policing by fear and disappearance. And it runs counter to everything the Bill of Rights was designed to prevent: punishment without trial, surveillance without suspicion, and power without accountability.
When ICE agents armed with military-grade equipment conduct predawn raids alongside SWAT teams, with little to no accountability, the result is not public safety. It is state terror. And it’s exactly the kind of unchecked power the Constitution was written to prevent.
The Constitution is supposed to be a shield—especially the Fourth Amendment, which guards against unreasonable searches and seizures. But in this new reality, the government has nullified that shield.
All of America is fast becoming a Constitution-free zone.
What started as an exception—the so-called Constitution-free zone at the border—is fast becoming the norm across America, where due process is optional, and law enforcement acts more like a domestic army than a public servant.
The government no longer needs to prove its authority in court before violating your rights. It only needs to assert it on your doorstep—with flashbangs and rifles at the ready.
The only castle left may be the one you’re willing to defend.
The Founders knew the dangers of unchecked power. That’s why they gave us the Fourth Amendment. But rights are only as strong as the public’s willingness to defend them.
If we allow the government to turn our homes into war zones—if we continue to reward police for lawless raids, ignore the courts for rubber-stamping abuse, and cheer political leaders who promise “no more handcuffs”—we will lose the last refuge of freedom: the right to be left alone.
As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People and in its fictional counterpart The Erik Blair Diaries, the Constitution cannot protect you if the government no longer follows it—and if the courts no longer enforce it.
The knock may never come again. Just the crash of a door. The sound of boots. And the silence that follows.
Reprinted with permission from the Rutherford Institute.
-
Site: Zero HedgeA Taxing Showdown: Trump Says Harvard Will Lose Tax-Exempt StatusTyler Durden Fri, 05/02/2025 - 09:45
The woke liberal elites, perched high in their Harvard University ivory towers in Cambridge, Massachusetts, have been plotted at extreme levels on the "F*ck Around and Find Out" (FAFO) chart, which illustrates their relationship between taking risks ("f*ck around") and facing consequences ("find out") in response to President Trump's simple request to dismantle the toxic framework of diversity, equity, and inclusion on campus.
The standoff between President Trump and woke elites deepened on Friday morning after the president wrote on Truth Social: "We are going to be taking away Harvard's Tax Exempt Status. It's what they deserve!"
On Wednesday, President Trump suggested to U.S. Education Secretary Linda McMahon that the federal government may stop giving the far-left university grants: "And it looks like we are not going to be giving them any more grants, right Linda?"
The president has launched a formal review into the $9 billion in federal funding for the university. He demanded the university end DEI and crack down on anti-Semitic protests fueled by pro-Palestinian groups.
F*ck Around:
Find Out:
Last week, the president asked the Internal Revenue Service to revoke Harvard University's tax-exempt status. The Ivy League school's failure to wind down woke and toxic liberal agendas that undermine the nation has left it at the end phase of FAFO.
On Thursday night, Trump told students in his commencement address at the University of Alabama: "The next chapter of the American story will not be written by the Harvard Crimson. It will be written by you, the Crimson Tide."
-
Site: LifeNews
President Donald Trump signed an executive order Thursday directing the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) to halt federal funding for National Public Radio (NPR) and the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS), marking a significant step in his administration’s push to curb taxpayer support for the two liberal news outlets.
The order, announced late Thursday, instructs the CPB to terminate direct funding to NPR and PBS “to the maximum extent allowed by law” and to take steps to “minimize or eliminate” indirect funding through grants to local stations.
The White House framed the move as a response to what it called “radical, woke propaganda disguised as news” from the broadcasters, which receive millions annually in taxpayer funds.
“President Trump just signed an executive order ENDING the taxpayer subsidization of NPR and PBS — which receive millions from taxpayers to spread radical, woke propaganda disguised as ‘news,’” the White House stated on social media. The order argues that government funding for news media is “outdated and unnecessary” in today’s diverse media landscape and “corrosive to the appearance of journalistic independence.”
Click here to sign up for pro-life news alerts from LifeNews.com
Conservatives have long criticized NPR and PBS for liberal bias, pointing to coverage they say disproportionately favors leftist viewpoints. The executive order cites the abundance of private media options in the digital era, stating that NPR and PBS “no longer serve a meaningful purpose warranting taxpayer funding.”
The CPB, a congressionally chartered nonprofit, distributes about $535 million annually to public radio and television stations, with a portion supporting NPR and PBS. While NPR receives roughly 1% of its budget directly from federal funds and PBS about 16%, local stations rely more heavily on CPB grants, which can account for 8% to 10% of their budgets.
The move follows earlier signals from the Trump administration, which in April announced plans to ask Congress to rescind $1.1 billion in CPB funding, equivalent to two years of its budget. That proposal has yet to be submitted, but Thursday’s executive order escalates the effort by directly targeting the broadcasters.
Critics of NPR and PBS, including GOP lawmakers, have intensified scrutiny in recent months. In March, the House Oversight and Government Reform subcommittee grilled NPR and PBS executives over allegations of biased reporting. Brendan Carr, Trump’s pick to lead the Federal Communications Commission, also launched an investigation into whether the broadcasters’ underwriting spots violate laws banning commercial advertisements.
The White House order further directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services to investigate potential employment discrimination at NPR and PBS, citing concerns over compliance with federal anti-discrimination laws.
The CPB, which Congress established in 1967 to shield public media from political interference, has already pushed back against the administration. Earlier this week, it sued the White House over attempts to remove three board members, arguing that the CPB, as a private entity, is not subject to presidential authority. Legal challenges to the executive order are expected, with analysts questioning its enforceability given the CPB’s funding structure and congressional oversight.
House Speaker Mike Johnson signaled openness to reviewing public media funding, noting “thoughtful debate” among lawmakers. However, the CPB’s budget is approved through September 2027, potentially complicating immediate cuts.
Trump’s order aligns with broader efforts to reduce federal spending and dismantle programs viewed as misaligned with conservative priorities.
The post President Trump Signs Executive Order Defunding NPR and PBS appeared first on LifeNews.com.
-
Site: Mises InstituteThe Department of Education has the role of selecting and authorizing private accrediting agencies which, in turn, are enabled to give or not give accreditation.
-
Site: OnePeterFive
The Crusade of Eucharistic Reparation is a lay sodality run by OnePeterFive in partnership with Benedictus and LatinMass.com (Mass of the Ages). This crusade was called by His Excellency, Bishop Athanasius Schneider in June of 2020 in response to the profanations of Our Lord in the Blessed Sacrament during the COVID crisis. Now he has also added the intention of the reversal of Traditionis…
-
Site: LifeNews
Congressional Republicans are putting together legislation that would defund America’s biggest abortion business.
According to a new Fox News report, House Republicans are discussing a measure that would defund Big Abortion, including both the Planned Parenthood abortion chain as well as other companies that kill babies for profit.
The defunding is part of a package of legislation the House is considering to cut at least $1.5 trillion in spending and it follows on the heels of House Speaker Mike Johnson saying he wants to use reconciliation to defund Planned Parenthood.
“We are working on a lot of different options, but that’s been discussed,” Committee Chairman Brett Guthrie, R-Ky., told Fox News Digital when asked directly about Planned Parenthood. “Yeah, it’s been discussed.”
Click here to sign up for pro-life news alerts from LifeNews.com
Reconciliation is a budgetary process that allows both the House and Senate to pass a major piece of financial legislation with just a majority vote – normal in the House but helpful in the Senate because it’s not subject to the filibuster Senate Democrats would typically use to block pro-life legislation.
Planned Parenthood received $699.3 million in taxpayer funding fiscal year and carried out 392,712 abortions in its 2022-2023 fiscal year, according to its most recent annual report.
The Speaker of the House says he’s fully on board with taking away taxpayer dollars from America’s biggest abortion chain, but the House would need the votes to do it. With a very narrow Republican majority and no pro-life Democrats that’s easier said than done.
Still, Johnson said he would like to defund the abortion giant and is working to build the votes to do it. Likely, the only way that can be accomplished is via a reconciliation bill — which both the House and Senate can pass on a majority vote margin.
“I would like to. That’s for sure,” Johnson said in an interview on Fox News’s “The Story with Martha MacCallum,” when asked whether he plans to axe the two organizations.
“Yeah,” Johnson said, when MacCallum clarified whether he wants to cut spending to the organizations, adding, however, that, “We got to build consensus to have the votes to do that.”
“Now, some of this will be done by executive order out of the White House. He has a broad authority to do a lot of that,” Johnson said, referring to President-elect Trump. “But where Congress is involved, that’s where it takes the hard work of legislating and getting everybody on the same page.”
Despite the U.S. Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey on June 24, 2022, Planned Parenthood aborted five percent more unborn children during the 2022-2023 fiscal year than the previous year and brought in more than $2.9 billion in assets.
In the recently released 2022-2023 fiscal year annual report titled, “Above & Beyond,” Planned Parenthood states it performed 392,715 abortions. That means Planned Parenthood killed 1,075 babies in abortions every single day even though the abortion giant claims its main focus is merely “women’s health care.” In other words, Planned Parenthood kills 44 babies every hour.
Despite the fact that the High Court ruled there is no right to an abortion on a federal level, Planned Parenthood continues to make profit from abortions its top priority.
“Above & Beyond” also shows that 34 percent of Planned Parenthood’s revenue, $699.3 million, comes from “government health services reimbursements and grants,” or taxpayer dollars.
Taxpayer funding of Planned Parenthood surged $65.9 million after Joe Biden took office in 2021, even as inflation and a slow economic recovery from the artificial COVID shutdowns eroded Americans’ real income.
The post House Republicans Putting Together Legislation to Defund Planned Parenthood appeared first on LifeNews.com.
-
Site: AsiaNews.itA hundred people have died in clashes between Druze and Sunni militias near Damascus and Suwayda. The spiritual leader of Syria's Druze calls for international intervention. In Lebanon, groups hostile to Syria's Islamist regime hold protest rallies. Jumblatt announces agreement in principle with Damascus. At dawn Israel struck near the Syrian presidential palace as a warning.
-
Site: PaulCraigRoberts.org
Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein were spies who used underage sex to blackmail politicians
-
Site: PaulCraigRoberts.org
Great Britain Has Degenerated Into a Police State
There is no longer any doubt about it.
https://www.unz.com/article/the-west-serves-as-israels-police-w-richard-medhurst/
-
Site: PaulCraigRoberts.org
A Russian Commentator Provides a More Accurate Picture of Trump than Does the Western Media
“The first 100 days of Donald Trump’s second presidency have sparked a wave of commentary portraying him as a revolutionary. Indeed, the speed, pressure, and determination with which he has acted are striking. But this view is superficial. Trump is not dismantling the foundations of the American state or society. On the contrary, he seeks to restore the pre-globalist republic that the liberal elite long ago diverted onto a utopian internationalist path. In this sense, Trump is not a revolutionary, but a counterrevolutionary – an ideological revisionist determined to reverse the excesses of the liberal era.
“At home, Trump benefits from Republican majorities in both houses of Congress. Legal challenges to his policies – particularly on downsizing government and deporting illegal immigrants – have so far made little progress. Accustomed to media attacks, Trump continues to hit back hard. The recent story alleging that top officials debated strikes on Yemen over Signal has not gained political traction. If anything, it reinforces Trump’s image as a president who acts decisively and without fear of scandal.
“Trump’s economic course is clear: re-industrialization, tariff protectionism, and investment in cutting-edge technologies. He is reversing decades of globalist integration, pressing allies to pool financial and technological resources with the US to rebuild its industrial base. Tactically, Trump applies pressure early, then offers retreats and compromises to lure competitors into negotiations favorable to America. This approach has been effective, particularly with Washington’s allies. Even with China, Trump is betting that Beijing’s reliance on the US market, and America’s influence over EU and Japanese trade policy, will yield strategic concessions.”
Dmitry Trenin’s assessment can be read here: https://www.rt.com/news/616578-trumps-foreign-policy-calculated/
PCR comment: Trenin, like so many Russians hopeful of being part of the West, overlooks the possibility that the purpose of the Ukrainian peace negotiations is to sequence the West’s wars against Russia and China. I look forward to reading Dmitry Trenin’s assessment of West Mitchell’s recent article in Foreign Affairs. https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2025/04/26/a-peace-deal-or-a-deception/
-
Site: PaulCraigRoberts.org
Trump Can Tell the Truth In A Very Poignant Way
https://x.com/townhallcom/status/1917985594136822091
And he can also tell fibs:
Trump Claims US Did ‘More Than Any Other Country’ to Win World War II
Trump’s claim is ridiculous. He is making a fool of himself. It was the Soviet Army that defeated Germany. All of the significant battles were in Russia. The enormous differences in battle deaths prove it.
Total US battle deaths (Germany and Japan): 291,557. Total WW II US military deaths (all causes): 407,316. The war with Japan accounted for 111,606 of the US military deaths.
Russian WW II dead: 27,000,000.
Germany’s war dead (including civilians): 18,000,000.
Trump’s false claim does not create an image of a person whose veracity will be trusted by the Kremlin.
-
Site: Zero HedgeFutures Rise Ahead Of Payrolls After China Hints At Trade TalksTyler Durden Fri, 05/02/2025 - 08:24
US equity futures gained ahead of the April Payolls report, but were well of their highs, after China said it is assessing the possibility of trade talks with the US, the first sign that negotiations could begin between the two sides since Donald Trump hiked tariffs last month. As of 8:10am ET, S&P futures are up 0.4% while Nasdaq 100 contracts add 0.2%, limited by weakness in the tech sector as Apple and Amazon.com shares fall in premarket after their respective updates appeared to underwhelm investors. If the S&P 500 closes in the green on Friday, it would mark a ninth day of gains, the longest winning streak for the US benchmark since November 2004. Asian markets were also broadly higher and Europe's Estoxx 50 advances 1.5% in early London session, with risk sentiment stoked after China hinted at the possibility of trade talks. Bond yields are unchanged, reversing an earlier drop, oil and USD are both lower, while gold rebounds +0.7% from recent losses. Today, all eyes on NFP at 8.30am ET to assess market sentiment; Consensus expects a 138k print vs. 228k prior and the Unemployment Rate to hold at 4.2% (more in the full preview here).
In premarket trading, Apple falls 3% after the iPhone maker reported China sales that were disappointing, and warned about the impact of tariffs. Amazon.com slips 0.5% after the e-commerce and cloud-computing company gave a weaker-than-expected outlook for operating income as tariff uncertainties weigh. Here are the other Mag7s: Alphabet +0.8%, Meta +1%, Nvidia +1.1%, Microsoft +0.3%, Tesla +0.4%. US-listed Chinese stocks rise as Beijing says its assessing the possibility of trade talks with America (Alibaba (BABA) +3%, Baidu (BIDU) +2%, NetEase (NTES) +1.3%). Airbnb (ABNB) fell 5% after issuing a weak outlook for the second quarter, citing economic uncertainties for softer travel demand in the US. Here are some other notable premarket movers:
- Ardelyx (ARDX) drops 17% after the biotech firm’s first-quarter revenue missed estimates,
- Atlassian (TEAM) sinks 17% after the software company gave an outlook that analysts are cautious about, although Barclays questioned the scale of the stock’s drop.
- Block (XYZ) sinks 21% after the financial services and digital payments company cut its adjusted operating income guidance for the full year.
- Chevron Corp. (CVX) slips 2% as the company will reduce share buybacks this quarter after oil prices tumbled.
- Cytokinetics (CYTK) falls 11% after the drug developer said US regulators need more time to review a safety plan for the company’s experimental heart drug aficamten.
- Duolingo (DUOL) gains 8% after raising its full-year sales and profit outlook as artificial intelligence offerings drive users to its higher-priced subscriptions.
- Exact Sciences (EXAS) gains 11% after the maker of the Cologuard cancer test boosted its revenue and adjusted Ebitda forecasts for the full year following a largely better-than-expected first quarter.
- Exxon Mobil Corp. (XOM) climbs about 1% after the company met earnings estimates due to higher production from low-cost projects, allowing it to maintain its share buybacks despite the recent drop in crude prices.
- Ingersoll Rand (IR), a company that makes equipment designed to control the flow of energy such as air and gas compressors, falls 4% after the reducing its full year adjusted Ebitda forecast.
- LendingTree (TREE) declines 13% after the online loan marketplace cut its revenue guidance for the full year. The company also trimmed the upper end of its forecast range for year adjusted Ebitda.
- Take-Two Interactive Software (TTWO) declines 15% after announcing a delay in the release date of Grand Theft Auto VI.
- Twilio (TWLO) rises 8% after the communications software firm boosted some fiscal year forecasts.
- Reddit (RDDT) rises 8% after the social-networking company gave a second-quarter forecast that beat expectations.
Optimism is steadily fueling an equity comeback. If the S&P 500 closes in the green on Friday, it would mark the longest winning streak for the US benchmark since November 2004. Indeed, investors are now betting on a more market-friendly stance from President Donald Trump in the coming months, and fears about a US recession could diminish further if Friday’s key jobs report shows resilience, according to Bank of America Corp.’s Michael Hartnett.
“It seems we may have reached peak policy uncertainty,” said Kevin Thozet, a member of the investment committee at Carmignac in Paris. “There are talks ongoing, and Trump seems to have watered down some of his policies. If you add in that the earnings season has been fairly positive, the overall backdrop isn’t that bad.”
Even so, bets are rising the Federal Reserve will be forced to accelerate interest rate cuts to head off an economic slowdown. Money markets are pricing in almost four quarter-point rate cuts in 2025, one more than was anticipated before Trump’s tariff announcement on April 2.
Meanwhile, economists expect the jobs report to show only 138,000 new positions added in April after the data blew away expectations in March. The surveys behind the report were conducted the second week of April, when Trump put some levies on hold and sharply raised those on China goods (full preview here).
European stocks followed their Asian counterparts higher The Stoxx 600 is up 0.8%, led by gains in mining, technology and construction names. Utilities underperform. Here are some of the biggest movers on Friday:
- ING shares rise as much as 5.7% as analysts welcome the Dutch bank’s ‘solid’ first-quarter results and net profit beat, while warning the increase to CET1 guidance by year end may disappoint investors.
- Shell shares rise as much as 4.4% in London after the oil major’s first-quarter profit beat expectations, and it announced a $3.5 billion buyback.
- Commodity stocks are outperforming in Europe on Friday as oil and metal prices got a boost after China said it was evaluating having trade talks with the US, raising optimism that negotiations could reduce tariffs between the two largest economies.
- NatWest shares rose as much as 4.5%, hitting their highest level since 2011, after the UK bank delivered a profit beat to mark a “strong start” to 2025, according to RBC Capital Markets.
- Danske Bank shares rise as much as 3.9% after reporting pretax profits that beat estimates, driven by better-than-expected net interest income and fee income.
- SSP Group shares rise as much as 7.4% after a Financial Times report issued after the close on Thursday said activist investor Irenic Capital Management is building a stake in the catering and food concession company and plans to push management to boost profitability.
- Atalaya Mining shares jump as much as 6.6%, hitting their highest level since early October, after it was confirmed the copper-focused firm will join the FTSE 250.
- Colruyt shares fall as much as 19%, the steepest drop since September 2022, after the Belgian retailer cut its full-year guidance, citing stronger competition in the domestic market and lower-than-anticipated food inflation.
- Landis + Gyr shares fall as much as 8.2% after the Swiss energy management firm reported 2024 results that Vontobel analysts say were below expectations and cut its dividend.
- BASF shares fall as much as 3.3% after the German chemicals firm said uncertainty caused by US trade tactics means it can’t make reliable predictions for its business this year.
Earlier, Asian stocks surged to their highest level more than five weeks in broader regional rally after China said it was mulling trade talks with the US. The MSCI Asia Pacific Index rose as much as 1.8% to the highest since March 25, with TSMC, Alibaba and Tencent among the biggest boosts. The key regional gauge is on track for a third-straight week of gains in the rebound from Donald Trump’s tariff offensive. Taiwan’s benchmark advanced more than 2% Friday, leading gains around the region as many markets reopened after holidays. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index climbed more than 1% after China’s Commerce Ministry said it was assessing the possibility of trade talks with the Washington, the first sign since Trump hiked tariffs last month that negotiations could begin. Mainland markets remain shut. Australia and Singapore are gearing up for federal elections to be held on Saturday, with cost-of-living issues top of mind for voters in both nations. Australian stocks rose for a seventh straight day ahead of the vote, while shares were higher in Singapore on Friday.
In FX, the Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index falls 0.4%. The Aussie dollar and Swedish krona are leading gains against the greenback. EUR/USD rose 0.3% to 1.1329; GBP/USD rose 0.1% to 1.3229
In rates, treasuries are flat ahead of the US jobs report, as 10-year yields reverse a 2 bpsdrop to trade flat at 4.22%. Gilts outperform, with UK 10-year yields falling 7 bps to 4.41%. Bunds fall, with little reaction shown to euro-area CPI which rose slightly more than expected in April.
In commodities, oil prices decline as traders weigh the possibility of US-China trade talks and a fresh sanctions threat against Iranian flows against a potential supply hike from OPEC+. WTI falls 0.8% to $58.80 a barrel. Spot gold rises $22 to around $3,260/oz. Bitcoin edges up 0.3% toward $97,000.
Looking at today's calendar, the highlight is April jobs report (8:30am), and March factory orders and durable goods orders (10am)
Market Snapshot
- S&P 500 mini +0.3%
- Nasdaq 100 mini +0.2%
- Russell 2000 mini +0.8%
- Stoxx Europe 600 +0.9%
- DAX +1.5%
- CAC 40 +1.4%
- 10-year Treasury yield -2 basis points at 4.2%
- VIX -0.5 points at 24.08
- Bloomberg Dollar Index -0.4% at 1224.77
- euro +0.3% at $1.1328
- WTI crude -0.8% at $58.74/barrel
Top Overnight News
- China said Friday it was weighing starting talks with the U.S. to halt a trade war, but only if Washington shows sincerity through concrete measures such as by canceling tariffs against Beijing. WSJ
- China has started to exempt some goods from tariffs that may cover about $40 billion, or a quarter of its imports from the US, to soften the blow of the trade war on its own economy. BBG
- Japan’s chief negotiator expressed hopes of reaching a trade agreement with the US in June, even as a media report indicated the two sides remained at odds on the key issue of its car exports. BBG
- The US is working to ensure tensions between India and Pakistan don’t escalate, JD Vance said. He also told Fox News India will be among the first trade deals done. BBG
- US President Trump is planning to release his FY 2026 budget on Friday, according to Axios. It was separately reported that President Trump is to propose slashing USD 163bln in government programs in budget blueprint: WSJ.
- US Envoy told NATO allies that US President Trump may skip the NATO summit; Trump may not attend if there is no 5% spending target agreement: Spiegel
- Eurozone CPI for Apr runs hot on headline (+2.2% vs. the Street +2.1%) and esp. on core (+2.7% vs. the Street +2.5%, and up from +2.4% in Mar) BBG.
- US bank reserves dropped by $209 billion to $3 trillion in the week through April 30. That’s the lowest since Jan. 1 and the biggest weekly decline this year. BBG
- Apple added to fears about levies, warning its costs will jump by $900 million this quarter. Amazon cut its operating profit projections, saying it expects to be “materially affected” by tariffs, FX fluctuations and recession worries. AAPL -3.15% premkt, AMZN -85bps. BBG
- America’s money managers are more bearish today than they have been in nearly 30 years. Barron’s latest Big Money poll of professional investors finds 32% of respondents bearish on the outlook for stocks over the next 12 months—the highest percentage since at least 1997. BBG
Trade/Tariffs
- US Department of Commerce launched the Section 232 steel and aluminium inclusions process which allows US manufacturers and trade associations to request the inclusion of new derivative articles under Section 232 steel and aluminium tariffs, according to a statement cited by Reuters.
- De minimis exception for products from China and Hong Kong imported to the US is now voided, as scheduled.
- US Secretary of State Rubio said the Chinese want to meet and talk, while he added those talks will come up soon and there's a broader question about how much we should buy from China going forward.
- China is said to be conducting an assessment on US trade negotiations and urged the US to demonstrate sincerity for trade talks, while it urged the US to correct mistakes regarding tariffs and noted it is currently evaluating possible US trade talks.
- China's MOFCOM said the tariff and trade war was unilaterally initiated by the US and the US should show its sincerity in talks, while it added the US has repeatedly expressed its willingness to negotiate with China on the tariff issue and has recently taken the initiative to convey information to the Chinese side through relevant parties on several occasions, hoping to talk with the Chinese side. MOFCOM added that China’s position has always been the same: 'talk, the door is open,' as well as noted the US should show sincerity if it wants to talk and that in any possible dialogue or meeting if the US does not correct its unilateral tariff measures, it has no sincerity at all. Furthermore, it stated the US should be prepared to take action in correcting erroneous practices and cancelling unilateral tariffs.
- Japanese PM Ishiba said there is no change at all to Japan’s stance of requesting the US to cancel tariffs, while he added they are not in a situation where common ground has been found yet but he received a report from Economic Minister Akazawa that talks were forward-looking. Furthermore, Ishiba commented that reaching a deal in haste is not necessarily in the best interest.
- Japanese Finance Minister Kato said Japan's huge US Treasury holdings are among the tools it can wield in trade negotiations with the US but added that whether Japan wields that card is a different question.
- Japan's Economic Minister Akazawa said that US tariff negotiations lasted for 130 minutes and they were able to have a thorough discussion in which repeated its request for a review of tariffs on Japan, while they talked about how Japan can expand trade, non-tariff measures and economic security with the US. Akazawa said they told the US that tariff measures are regrettable and they want to hold the next meeting after mid-May, while they asked the US to review tariff measures on auto parts and the negotiation was handled as a package. Furthermore, they did not talk about China during the talks and he understands that the US wants to reach some kind of agreement within the 90-day window with various countries.
A more detailed look at global markets courtesy of Newsquawk
APAC stocks traded mostly higher as many regional participants returned from the Labor Day holiday and with some hopes for US-China trade talks. ASX 200 gained with the advances led by outperformance in the energy sector following the upside in oil prices and with a continuation of the status quo seen as the outcome in tomorrow's federal election with Australian PM Albanese highly favoured to win a second term. Nikkei 225 rallied at the open but is off intraday highs after stalling near the 37,000 level and following a surprise increase in Japan's unemployment rate. Hang Seng outperformed on return from the holiday closure and despite the continued absence of mainland participants, while there were reports that China is currently evaluating possible US trade talks and noted that the US has repeatedly expressed its willingness to negotiate with China on the tariff issue, although it urged the US to demonstrate sincerity for trade talks and correct its unilateral tariff measures.
Top Asian news
- China-linked group was accused of meddling in Australia's election with the Chinese Communist Party-linked Australia Hubei Association said to have mobilised volunteers to support an independent candidate ahead of Saturday's federal election in Australia, according to Nikkei.
European bourses (STOXX 600 +1%) are entirely in the green as the region returns from holiday; sentiment today has been boosted following a strong session on Wall Street in the prior session, and mostly positive APAC trade overnight. Price action has been relatively rangebound and near recent highs, with traders ultimately cautious ahead of the day's key US NFP report. European sectors hold a strong positive bias; Tech tops the pile, followed closely by Industrials (lifted by post-earning strength in Airbus) whilst Utilities is found at the foot of the pile. A number of banks reported today; Standard Chartered (+1%, strong Q1 results), ING (+4.5%, reported record deposit growth and launched EUR 2bln share buyback), Danske Bank (+4%, strong results across the board and guidance range topped expectations), NatWest (+1.9%, Q1 headline figures beat expectations and suggested 2025 income to be at top-end of guidance range).
Top European news
- UK by-election: Reform wins Runcorn and Helsby by a margin of six votes with 38.7% of the total vote.
FX
- USD is currently softer vs. all major peers with DXY snapping a run of 3 consecutive sessions of gains which have in part been driven by the recent recovery in US risk assets. This in part has been driven by the performance of corporate America in Q1 earnings season and hopes of a US-China trade deal. On the former, reports suggest that China is conducting an assessment on US trade negotiations and evaluating possible US trade talks. DXY currently sits within Thursday's 99.61-100.37 range.
- EUR firmer vs. the USD and one of the better performers across the majors. From a fundamental perspective, attention has been on comments from EU negotiator Sefcovic who said Europe is ready to make US President Trump an offer, in which Brussels wants to increase purchases of US goods by EUR 50bln to address the “problem” in the trade relationship. On the data front, EZ HICP Flash metrics incrementally topped expectations, but ultimately had little impact on the Single-Currency.
- USD/JPY initially extended on the prior day's BoJ-spurred upward momentum but then pulled back from resistance just shy of the 146.00 level. There was little reaction seen following reports of US-Japan tariff talks or comments from Japanese Finance Minister Kato who said Japan's huge US Treasury holdings are among tools it can wield in trade negotiations with the US but added whether Japan wields that card is a different question. More recently, a report in the Nikkei suggested that US trade negotiators presented a framework for an agreement with Japan, however, Japan strongly opposed the proposal. In recent trade USD/JPY has dipped below the 145.00 mark.
- GBP is firmer vs. the USD but modestly so and below the opening levels of the week despite the notable rally on Monday. Price action for Cable has largely been at the whim of the Greenback with incremental macro drivers for the UK exceptionally light aside from some upbeat commentary on the prospects of a UK-US trade deal.
- Antipodeans are both firmer and supported by the current risk-environment which has been underpinned by hopes of a potential US-China trade deal (China is both nation's largest trading partner). AUD has overlooked disappointing Australian Retail Sales data and is looking ahead to Saturday's federal election with PM Albanese seen as likely to secure a second term.
Fixed Income
- USTs are contained into NFP. The headline is expected to show a marked cooling in the pace of Payrolls to 130k (prev. 228k), with a range of 25-195k. The report will be scoured for signs of Trump’s tariffs and associated reciprocal measures impacting the US labour market. USTs holding around 112-00 in 111-23+ to 112-01+ confines, a tick below Thursday’s base but some way clear of that session’s 112-20 peak; the high occurred in the early US morning, before the ISM release. On the trade front, US trade relations with constructive reports in the FT around EU concessions to address the trade deficit with the US in addition to reports that the US has reached out to China to seek talks alongside constructive MOFCOM language.
- Elsewhere, the Japanese Finance Minister stated that Japan’s holdings of USTs could be “among such cards” used in trade negotiations, though Kato added “whether we actually use that card, however, is a different question”. Little move was seen in USTs at the time.
- Bunds opened near enough unchanged at 131.75 after the Labour Day holiday. Just after the resumption of trade they lifted to a 131.81 peak for the session before slipping as low as 131.34 in the early European morning as participants reacted to the US-China updates overnight. Thereafter, lifted around 25 ticks from that low but remained in the red and held around that mark into data. EZ HICP came in hotter across the board and the ex-Food & Energy measures eclipsed the forecast range alongside Services jumping to 3.9% (prev. rev. 3.5%); Bunds knee jerked lower but remained well within earlier confines and have since pared the entire move and are back to holding off lows but remain in the red by around 10 ticks.
- Gilts opened lower by around 20 ticks, catching up to the slight bearish bias in APAC hours on the points outlined in USTs. Thereafter, the benchmark began to inch its way higher and is currently modestly outperforming at the top-end of a 93.30-91 band, just eclipsing Thursday’s 93.88 high. In terms of the slight outperformance, there isn’t a clear or overt headline driver behind it and instead it may be a function of Gilts not being capped/weighed on in the way that USTs and EGBs are by progress on trade talks.
Commodities
- The crude complex opened with a positive bias, continuing the upside seen in the prior session, which stemmed from the broader risk-on sentiment and after Trump's latest Iran threats. As the session progressed, the complex has been gradually cooling off those highs, to currently trade lower by around USD 0.40/bbl. Brent July'2025 currently trades in a USD 61.72-62.72/bbl range.
- Precious metals are broadly in the green, benefiting from the softer Dollar. XAU/USD is firmer today, attempting to make back some of its recent losses; currently higher by around USD 21/oz, in a USD 3,227.67-3,263.36/oz range.
- Base metals hold a strong positive bias, benefitting from the positive risk tone and the softer Dollar. Sentiment has also been boosted as both US and China suggested a willingness by the other side for talks. 3M LME Copper currently +1.8%, and trading within a USD 9,241.95-9,411.15/t range.
Geopolitics: Middle East
- "Israel understood from Washington that if it decides to strike Iran, it will most likely do so alone as long as the nuclear negotiations continue", according to Sky News Arabia citing AP quoting an Israeli official
- Israeli PM Netanyahu said Israel attacked a target last night near the Syrian presidential palace in Damascus.
- Israeli Home Front said Northern Israel is under rocket attack from Yemen, according to Al Jazeera.
- Houthi-affiliated media reported US warplanes targeted the Yemeni capital Sana'a, according to Sky News Arabia.
- US Secretary of State Rubio said this is the best opportunity for Iran and that Iran should not be afraid of inspectors including Americans, according to a Fox News interview.
Geopolitics: Ukraine
- Ukrainian PM says two of the three documents on US minerals deal will not need ratification, according to a member of parliament.
- Ukraine's Parliament plans ratification vote on US minerals deal on May 8th, according to a lawmaker cited by Reuters.
- US VP Vance said Russia's war in Ukraine is not going to end anytime soon. It was separately reported that US Secretary of State Rubio said Ukraine and Russia's positions are still a little far apart, while he added it's going to take a breakthrough soon on Ukraine to make this possible or else the President will have to decide how much time to dedicate to this.
US Event Calendar
- 8:30 am: Apr Change in Nonfarm Payrolls, est. 137.5k, prior 228k
- 8:30 am: Apr Change in Private Payrolls, est. 124.5k, prior 209k
- 8:30 am: Apr Change in Manufact. Payrolls, est. -5k, prior 1k
- 8:30 am: Apr Unemployment Rate, est. 4.2%, prior 4.2%
- 8:30 am: Apr Average Hourly Earnings MoM, est. 0.3%, prior 0.3%
- 8:30 am: Apr Average Hourly Earnings YoY, est. 3.9%, prior 3.8%
- 10:00 am: Mar Factory Orders, est. 4.45%, prior 0.6%
- 10:00 am: Mar F Durable Goods Orders, est. 9.2%, prior 9.2%
- 10:00 am: Mar F Durables Ex Transportation, est. 0%, prior 0%
- 10:00 am: Mar F Cap Goods Orders Nondef Ex Air, est. 0.1%, prior 0.1%
- 10:00 am: Mar F Cap Goods Ship Nondef Ex Air, est. 0.3%, prior 0.3%
DB's Jim Reid concludes the overnight wrap
I briefly went back inside my old school (Hampton) last night for the first time in 33 years to help record a fund raising video. So I’m feeling a little nostalgic and old this morning. However, it could also be the incredible heatwave we’re having for the time of year playing tricks on me.
In markets as most of Europe was enjoying the one of the hotter May Day holidays on record, the S&P 500 (+0.63%) closed within 1.18% of its April 2nd close, just minutes before the Liberation Day press conference after the bell that day. This now also brings its gains over the last 8 sessions to a huge +8.65%. Indeed, that marks the fastest 8-session gain since November 2020, back when markets were surging after the announcement of the Pfizer vaccine that offered a path out of the pandemic. Meanwhile, other tariff-related moves also unwound, with the dollar index (+0.78%) hitting a 3-week high (albeit -3.43% below April 2nd close), whilst US HY spreads tightened -16bps. There continued to be mounting optimism around the trade war, following on from US trade representative Greer’s comments that deals were moving closer.
This optimism has continued overnight after China's Ministry of Commerce said that it's evaluating trade talks with the US. The ministry said this comes as "the US has recently sent messages to China through revenant parties" and urged Washington to shows "sincerity" towards China. Against that background Asian equities are higher on the news (more below), with S&P 500 (+0.77%) and NASDAQ 100 (+0.50%) futures also moving higher even after unwhelming results from Apple and Amazon last night.
Amazon’s Q1 performance was actually a touch above expectations, but the company gave weaker-than-expected guidance for the current quarter on the back of tariffs, projecting an operating profit of $13bn to $17.5bn (vs. $17.8bn expected). Amazon’s shares fell -3.2% in extended trading, mostly reversing a +3.13% gain during yesterday’s regular session. Apple delivered a modest headline beat across revenue ($95.4bn vs $94.6bn expected) and earnings, but weaker revenue in China ($16bn vs $16.83bn) was seen as a concerning sign of the potential trade war challenges. Apple stock slid by -3.8% after-hours (+0.39% yesterday). Both companies may be helped by the renewed trade optimism overnight. For more on tech’s recent performance, see our team’s April tech performance review here.
Looking back at yesterday, the tech earnings the night before played a big role in the market rally, with the Magnificent 7 surging +2.79%, alongside a +1.52% move for the NASDAQ. Microsoft gained +7.63% and Meta +4.23% after their results. Nvidia posted a +2.47% advance, also helped by a Bloomberg report that the US is considering easing restrictions on Nvidia chip sales to the UAE.
Earlier yesterday the risk-on tone had received additional support from the latest batch of US data, which wasn’t as bad as feared. In particular, the ISM manufacturing print only fell to 48.7 (vs. 47.9 expected), which wasn’t too much of a dip from the 49.0 reading in March, and still above its levels from May-November last year. Admittedly, the weekly initial jobless claims did tick up to 241k (vs. 223k expected), but that could be explained by a surge in New York, which probably reflected difficulties in the seasonal adjustment around the Easter holidays, so it wasn’t seen as a sign of a rapidly deteriorating labour market.
Staying on the data, the next watchpoint will be the US April jobs report out today, which is the first to cover the period since Liberation Day, and one of the first hard data points we’ll have. As a reminder, our US economists expect headline nonfarm payrolls to grow by +125K (vs +228K previously), with private payrolls at +125k (vs. +209k previously). So they see a reversion after a strong March, particularly within the leisure/hospitality and retail sectors but note the late Easter has the potential to distort the data and seasonal adjustments. They also expect unemployment to remain unchanged at +4.2%. You can see their full preview and register for their post-release webinar here.
Yesterday’s data also triggered a notable rise in Treasury yields, which unwound their initial decline after the ISM manufacturing release. With the release better than expected alongside the wider risk-on tone, investors dialled back their expectations for Fed rate cuts, and the 2yr Treasury yield moved up +9.6bps on the day to 3.70%, whilst the 10yr yield was up +4.86bps to 4.22%.
In Europe, markets were fairly quiet given Germany, France and Italy were closed for a public holiday. However, the UK’s FTSE 100 (+0.02%) advanced for a 14th consecutive day, which is a joint record since the index was formed back in 1984. And with most of Europe not trading, the STOXX 600 also saw a muted gain of +0.02%. Otherwise, gilt yields moved higher in line with US Treasuries, with the 10yr yield up +4.1bps on the day to 4.48%. They are both up around another +1.5bps overnight.
Coming back to Asia, equity markets are largely rising this morning boosted by the positive overnight performance on Wall Street amid China’s openness to trade negotiations. This is outweighing concerns about the effect of tariffs, which were initially triggered by disappointing earnings from Apple and Amazon. As I check my screens, the Hang Seng Tech Index (+3.37%) is surging with the Hang Seng (+1.63%) also trading sharply higher. Elsewhere, the S&P/ASX 200 (+0.91%) and the Nikkei (+0.53%) are also trading higher with the KOSPI (+0.19%) seeing minor gains. Meanwhile, China markets are closed for the Labour Day public holiday.
Early morning data showed that Australian retail sales experienced a third consecutive month of expansion in March. The +0.3% m/m increase, while marginally below the projected +0.4%, followed a +0.2% gain in the preceding month. This is a small support to the house view that the RBA should cut 25bps this month.
To the day ahead now, as mentioned earlier we will see US data releases on April Jobs, as well as March’s factory orders. Other notable data includes France March budget balance, Italy April manufacturing PMI, budget balance, March unemployment rate, Eurozone April CPI, March unemployment rate. Earnings include Exxon Mobil, Chevron, Shell, Apollo and Natwest.
-
Site: Zero HedgeTake-Two Plunges After Delaying Grand Theft Auto VITyler Durden Fri, 05/02/2025 - 08:20
Take-Two's wholly owned label, Rockstar Games, waited until the end of the week to disappoint global gamers—at least they didn't wait until Friday evening to announce yet another delay for Grand Theft Auto 6.
Take-Two released an 8-K filing just moments ago, embedded with a press release that specified Rockstar is now planning to release the video game that normalizes violent crime for May 26, 2026, pushed out from Fall of 2025.
GTA 5 has been delayed before...
-
Decemeber 2023: Analysts Fear Possible Delays Of Grand Theft Auto VI Release
-
May 2024: Take-Two Shares Drop After Grand Theft Auto VI Delayed Again
Take-Two Chairman and CEO Strauss Zelnick wrote in the press release:
"We support fully Rockstar Games taking additional time to realize their creative vision for Grand Theft Auto VI, which promises to be a groundbreaking, blockbuster entertainment experience that exceeds audience expectations.
"While we take the movement of our titles seriously and appreciate the vast and deep global anticipation for Grand Theft Auto VI, we remain steadfast in our commitment to excellence. As we continue to release our phenomenal pipeline, we expect to deliver a multi-year period of growth in our business and enhanced value for our shareholders."
News of the delay comes one day after technology news website Engadget reported that Xbox consoles and video games will experience price hikes. The average price for a AAA-rated game could soon be north of $80, if not $100. Read... "Grand Theft Auto VI Priced at $100?" This Gaming Analyst Believes So.".
Since the first GTA was released in 1997, the video game industry has been in a deflationary death spiral, with costs to develop games rising while retail prices crater.
GTA fans will have to wait another year, meaning the gap since GTA 5 debuted will exceed 13 years.
Take-Two's premarket losses are around 10% in New York. If losses are sustained through the cash session, this will mark the largest down day since November 8, 2022.
Take-Two really knows how to disappoint gamers.
-
-
Site: Mises InstituteRobert P. Murphy and Mark Spitznagel co-author this examination of how to look at the trade deficit. (paywalled)
-
Site: Zero HedgeFrustrated With Boeing, Trump Reportedly Turns To L3Harris For "Interim" Air Force One JetTyler Durden Fri, 05/02/2025 - 07:45
Frustrated by repeated delays in Boeing's new Air Force One production timeline, President Trump has reportedly commissioned defense contractor L3Harris Technologies to retrofit a Boeing 747 previously used by the Qatari government as an interim presidential aircraft.
The Wall Street Journal reported that L3Harris has been tasked with retrofitting the Qatari 747 with communications systems and other equipment to transform the luxury aircraft into Air Force One.
According to the people familiar with the matter, President Trump requested that L3Harris complete the needed retrofitting of the jumbo jet by as early as fall.
In February, FOX Business' Edward Lawrence confirmed that Boeing had suffered global supply chain snarls that changed project timings and delayed the completion date to 2029.
White House communications director Steven Cheung told FOX Business at the time: "It is ridiculous that the delivery of a new Air Force One airplane has been delayed for such a long time," adding, "The president working on identifying ways to speed up the delivery of a new plane, which has been needed for a while."
Months later, WSJ's L3Harris report may suggest that there were very limited options to speed up the Boeing delivery.
Here's more from the report:
Before Trump's inauguration, White House Military Office and senior Air Force officials considered canceling Boeing's contract for the new planes, according to people familiar with the matter. White House officials under Trump have also discussed whether they can sue the plane manufacturer, some of the people said.
Trump initially tapped the bloated defense contractor to build the next-generation presidential aircraft during his first term, aiming to replace the aging fleet. Boeing's failure to deliver on time has become emblematic of the broader military-industrial complex: bloated, sluggish, and unaccountable.
The military-industrial complex's failures must urgently be corrected. For now, L3Harris is stepping in, aiming to deliver a retrofitted Qatari 747 as an interim Air Force One jet by this fall.
America's defense space needs more domestic competition if it wants to compete in the 2030s.
-
Site: Catholic Herald
Each day between now and the May 7 conclave to elect a successor to Pope Francis, John Allen is offering a profile of a different papabile, the Italian term for a man who could be pope. There’s no scientific way to identity these contenders; it’s mostly a matter of weighing reputations, positions held and influence wielded over the years. There’s also certainly no guarantee one of these candidates will emerge wearing white; as an old bit of Roman wisdom has it, “He who enters a conclave as a pope exits as a cardinal.” These are, however, the leading names drawing buzz in Rome right now, at least ensuring they will get a look. Knowing who these men are also suggests issues and qualities other cardinals see as desirable heading into the election.
ROME – Sweden is widely considered one of the most secularised societies on the face of the earth, with a 2016 Gallup poll finding that almost 20 percent of Swedes identify as atheists and 55 percent say they’re non-religious, while an official government survey in 2015 found that only one in ten Swedes thinks religion is important in daily life.
Yet even in that hostile terrain, Catholicism today is growing – if not by leaps and bounds, at least at a steady pace, adding an estimated 2,000 to 3,000 members annually. Official figures put the total Catholic community at 130,000, but everyone knows the real number is much higher since many immigrant Catholics don’t register. The uptick is being driven in part by new arrivals, but also by a surprising number of conversions among native Swedes.
To some extent, the Church in Sweden today is the entire global Church in miniature, a cosmopolitan mix of Swedish converts along with Poles and French, swelled by recent immigrants from Africa, Asia and the Middle East, including a large cohort of Chaldean Catholics from Iraq.
The man presiding over this counter-intuitive Catholic revival is 75-year-old Cardinal Anders Arborelius, himself a convert to Catholicism, and seen by many as an ideal missionary to an increasingly secular world.
Born in Sorengo, Switzerland, in 1949, Arborelius grew up in a nominally Lutheran household which wasn’t especially active in the faith. By all accounts, however the young Arborelius himself had a keen religious sense, feeling himself drawn to a life of prayer and contemplation, and at the age of 20 he converted to Catholicism in the city of Malmö.
At that stage it was natural enough for Arborelius to feel drawn to the priesthood, and after reading the autobiography of St. Thérèse of Lisieux, he decided to join the order of the Discalced Carmelites. He would eventually study at the Pontifical Teresian Institute in Rome, learning Italian, while also earning a degree in modern languages (English, Spanish and French) at the Swedish University of Lund.
Arborelius was ordained to the priesthood in September 1979 and shortly thereafter took up residence at a Carmelite monastery in Norraby in the south of Sweden, where he would live for the next decade.
Over the course of those years Arborelius earned a reputation as an effective pastor and thinker, bringing him to the attention of the Vatican. In 1998 Pope John Paul II named him Bishop of Stockholm, making him the first ethnically Swedish Catholic bishop in the country, and only the second native Scandinavian bishop, since the era of the Protestant Reformation.
From the beginning, Arborelius made the decision that despite its small size and the historically dominant position of the Lutheran Church in Sweden, Catholicism on his watch wouldn’t just sit on the cultural sidelines. He became active in promoting pro-life movements, as well as being outspoken in defense of the country’s growing population of migrants and refugees. He took on active role in promoting youth organizations and movements in the Church, while writing a number of books on religious themes.
For a full decade, from 2005 to 2015, Arborelius served as the president of the bishops’ conference of Scandinavia. In October 2016 he hosted a visit to Sweden by Pope Francis, the heart of which was a joint Catholic/Lutheran commemoration of the 500th anniversary of the Reformation.
The act of coming together was considered especially striking given the historically bad blood between the two Christian confessions in the country: Beginning in the 16th century, Catholics were persecuted and even put to death in Sweden, and as recently as 1951 Catholics were barred from becoming doctors, teachers and nurses. Catholic convents and monasteries, such as the one Arborelius himself had lived in, were banned until the 1970s.
On the back of that trip, Pope Francis named Arborelius a cardinal in 2017, making him the first-ever cardinal from Sweden. The elevation made Arborelius even more of a point of reference in his home country – in June 2022, for example, he was awarded a medal by the King of Sweden for his contributions to national life.
In terms of his ideological orientation, Arborelius is notoriously difficult to pin down. He’s unabashedly traditional on matters of sexual morality; among other things, he oversaw the publication of St. Paul VI’s encyclical letter Humanae Vitae in Sweden in 2007, in the run-up to the document’s 40th anniversary the next year, praising its “reverence of nature” also in the arena of “sexuality and reproduction.” He’s come out in opposition to women’s ordination, optional clerical celibacy and the open-ended German “synodal way.”
Yet Arborelius also has views conventionally seen as more progressive on matters such as ecumenism and inter-faith dialogue (including with Islam), immigration, climate change, and Pope Francis’s call for a more “synodal” style of decision-making in the Church, as well as the late pope’s restrictions on celebration of the old Latin Mass.
On a personal level, it’s almost impossible to find anyone who dislikes Arborelius. He’s seen as open, generous, and affable, someone given to genuine dialogue and possessing a keen interest in others, as well as a man of real spiritual depth. If anything, some have raised the question of whether Arborelius is almost too nice, suggesting that his penchant for avoiding conflict has, at times, produced a weak and vacillating approach to governance in his own diocese.
The case for Arborelius?
If one fundamental job requirement of a pope is to be the Evangelist-in-Chief of the Catholic Church, Arborelius arguably fits the bill. He’s seen as especially gifted as a missionary to the most secular corners of Europe, where the fires of faith seem to be in greatest danger of going out. Despite the dynamism of the Church today across the developed world, no one’s quite ready simply to write Europe off, and Arborelius might be seen as uniquely capable of reviving the Church’s fortunes on the Old Continent.
Further, his intriguing mix of conservative positions on some matters and progressive stances on others could make him an ideal compromise candidate between those seeking continuity with Pope Francis and those desiring greater doctrinal stability and clarity. Each would get at least part of what they want with Arborelius, along with the assurance that the new pope is someone would at least listen to their concerns and take them seriously.
In terms of the conventional logic of conclave handicapping, Arborelius ticks a number of the usual boxes.
He’s certainly got the command of languages conventionally seen as desirable, and at 75 he’s right in the sweet spot of the desired age profile (the last two popes, Benedict XVI and Francis, were elected at 78 and 76 respectively). While he doesn’t have a great deal of international experience in terms of serving abroad, he has traveled widely over the years, and in any event, the world has come to him in Sweden in the multi-ethnic and multi-lingual Church over which he presides.
The case against?
Arborelius’ reputation as an indecisive and occasionally weak administrator doesn’t help, especially at a time when most cardinals believe that finishing the Vatican reform started under Pope Francis (or correcting it, depending on your point of view) is going to require a strong hand at the rudder.
Moreover, the way Arborelius blends continuity and rupture with the Pope Francis legacy could hurt his chances more than it helps them, leaving him effectively a man without a country, meaning without a strong base of support in any camp.
Further, Arborelius himself has conceded that he hasn’t quite developed the wide network of relationships among his fellow cardinals that would come in handy in terms of the electoral math of the conclave, saying recently that he knows personally only about 20 or 30 of his fellow electors – a far cry from the 89 votes needed to cross the two-thirds threshold.
In a recent interview with Our Sunday Visitor, Arborelius offered a profile of the next pope.
“That’s what people really need in a time like this — that we find someone who can help them be freed from sin, from hatred, from violence, to bring about reconciliation and a deeper encounter,” he said.
Time will tell if his brother cardinals agree with that assessment … and if they see Arborelius himself as the man to do it.
The post Papabile of the Day: Cardinal Anders Arborelius first appeared on Catholic Herald.
The post Papabile of the Day: Cardinal Anders Arborelius appeared first on Catholic Herald.
-
Site: Mises InstituteIn this edition of Friday Philosophy, Dr. David Gordon reviews Arnold Schelsky‘s The Hype Cycle and finds some worthy insights into things that modern culture has hyped, such as climate change.
-
Site: Novus Motus LiturgicusLost in Translation #124 After the incensation, the priest goes to the Epistle side and washes his hands, reciting Psalm 25, 6-12: Lavábo inter innocentes manus meas: et circúmdabo altáre tuum, Dómine.Ut audiam vocem laudis: et enarrem universa mirabilia tua.Dómine, dilexi decórem domus tuae: et locum habitatiónis gloriae tuae.Ne perdas cum impiis, Deus, ánimam meam: et cum viris sánguinum Michael P. Foleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02649905848645336033noreply@blogger.com0
-
Site: non veni pacem
The prayer I read at the end of the podcast, from Father Z:
Prayer for the Election of the Roman Pontiff
O God the Father Almighty, who at the beginning of creation calmed the primordial waters by the hovering of the Holy Spirit, deign swiftly to send the same Spirit upon Your Church for the purpose of electing the Successor of the Holy Apostle Peter, so that, the new Roman Pontiff duly elected, tranquility may be fostered and expanded.
O God, Lord Jesus, whose Body is the Church founded by You on the Apostle Peter, grant, we beg You, that you defend with angelic protection and strengthen with many graces the Cardinals whose task it is to elect his Successor, so that in these days before and during the Conclave, their words and deeds, for the true good of You Church, will result in peace and the salvation of souls.
O God the Holy Spirit, Paraclete, Divine Breath of the Trinity, deign to waft through all the locales and dwellings of the Cardinals-elect, on our knees we beg You, to repel diabolical schemes, to crush external forces, to bring clarity and serenity to Your Church.
O God, Most Holy Trinity, in Your infinite mercy and according to Your ineffable providence for the Church, inspire, guide and gently urge, if necessary even with supernatural signs, the Cardinals in the Conclave to grant us a good and wise Pope, a kindly but strong Shepherd, a faithful and reverent Vicar of Christ, a praying and prudent Successor of Peter, a Roman Pontiff who loves and preserves the customs of our forebears, a steadfast, pious, virile and holy man, namely, one better than we deserve. Amen.
Holy Mother of God, intercede for us.
Saint Peter, intercede for us.
Saint Paul, intercede for us.
All Holy Popes, intercede for us.
Pages
