Distinction Matter - Subscribed Feeds

  1. Site: The Center for Bioethics and Culture Network
    4 days 8 hours ago
    Author: CBC-Network

    Good evening, distinguished guests, steadfast supporters, and cherished friends. It’s a joy to stand before you tonight, to celebrate a milestone that feels both monumental and humbling—25 years of the Center for Bioethics and Culture. As we prepare to celebrate not only the longevity and legacy of the CBC, but the important work of Dr. Robbie George, I stand in front of you filled with gratitude- for our dedicated team, our supporters, and everyone here who is celebrating with us. Thank you for joining us to honor this remarkable journey and to chart the course ahead.

    Let’s rewind to the year 2000, when Y2K fears faded but science surged forward —genetic engineering, stem cell research, and assisted reproductive technologies were no longer science fiction but headlines. Terms like “egg donation,” “surrogacy,” and “designer babies” entered the mainstream, often hailed as progress. Amid the enthusiasm of a new millennium, a quiet but profound question emerged: What does it mean to be human in an age where we can reshape life itself? Our founder, Jennifer Lahl, didn’t shy away from that question. Instead, she leaned into it, launching the Center for Bioethics and Culture with a vision as bold as it was compassionate—to ensure that biotechnology serves humanity, not the other way around. When the culture around science and medicine was charging full speed ahead—driven by profit, prestige, and promise—Jennifer paused, looked closer, and asked: “At what cost?”

    From a small spark of one woman’s resolve, the CBC has grown into a global force, tackling issues like euthanasia, surrogacy, egg “donation”, genetic manipulation, and the gender ideology industry. We’ve done so not with fear, but with clarity, reason, and an unshakable belief in the worth of every person. Our mission has never been to halt progress but to ask the hard questions: Who benefits? Who is harmed? And how do we protect the vulnerable in a world that often prioritizes profit over people?

    Over the last 25 years we have witnessed a deep ethical erosion happening beneath the surface of medicine and in our culture celebrating the reduction and erasure of women, treating children as products and science experiments- ordered, delivered, maimed or rejected. But we have not wavered in our mission to work with cultural leaders, decision makers and others, so that progress in biotechnology will unite around a common human good promoting human flourishing. Tonight, you’ll hear first-hand from Dr. Eithain Haim, a young surgeon who stood up to such erosion.

    Before we hear from our award winner and keynote speaker, let me paint a picture of what these 25 years have meant- of what we have accomplished. One of our most powerful tools in educating has always been storytelling. In 2006, we released our first, award-winning documentary Eggsploitation, which peeled back the curtain on the egg “donation” industry – exposing the physical and emotional toll on young women who sell their eggs. That film didn’t just inform—it ignited a movement, giving voice to women who’d been silenced and prompting policy discussions worldwide. Currently, we are working with women around the world who were harmed after traveling to Canada to sell their eggs. These women are pursuing justice through a class action lawsuit. Our second film Breeders: A Subclass of Women?, exposed the human cost of surrogacy. Since that film debuted, we have been the go-to organization for the countless women exploited through surrogacy. Women like Brenda* who was told to abort the twins she was carrying because they had in-utero health complications. Women like Kelly* who wanted to share about her high-risk surrogate pregnancy that ended with a stay in the ICU, 7 blood transfusions, and the loss of her uterus. Women like Emma* who need legal support during their surrogate pregnancy because things didn’t go as planned and her and her children face homelessness or breach of contract. We will continue to amplify the voices of women and children who have been directly affected by third-party reproduction —many of whom are speaking out for the first time.

    In 25 years the CBC has produced eleven original documentary films. Our last three a trilogy of films which courageously navigated the complexities of gender ideology with empathy and truth.

    Our films have reached millions—screened in universities, churches, and parliaments, translated into multiple languages, and shared by people hungry for honest answers. They don’t just educate; they humanize, putting faces and stories to issues too often reduced to soundbites. Film after film, story after story, we’ve asked our audience—and the culture at large—not to look away.

    Our impact goes far beyond the screen. We’ve hosted symposiums, published hundreds of articles, op-eds, policy briefs, educational resources, and reports offering a steady voice in a noisy world and ensuring that ethical considerations are not overshadowed by profit motives or political pressure. We’ve testified before legislatures, advocating for laws that protect rather than exploit. Our team has brought research, compassion, and clarity to rooms where difficult decisions were being made. Whether the issue was commercial surrogacy or puberty blockers, the CBC has consistently been a voice for human dignity and the protection of the most vulnerable. Just this past year, we provided expert testimony in legislative hearings across several states including Minnesota and our nation’s capital and in 2024 we made a permanent mark on the right side of history. The CBC, along with Jordan Peterson, Chloe Cole, Laura Becker, Gays Against Groomers and numerous other detransitioners, scholars, researchers, healthcare providers, and public officials we supported and signed an amicus brief for U.S. v Skrmetti, backing the State of Tennessee’s restrictions on “gender-affirming” care for minors.

    We’ve also hosted podcasts and been podcast guests ourselves. In the last few months, I had the privilege of sitting down with influential voices like Nicole Shanahan, Robert Kennedy’s VP running mate, and Allie Beth Stuckey, host of Relatable with over 1/2 million subscribers. In those conversations, I was able to dive deep into the ethical challenges of surrogacy and assisted reproduction—conversations that reached thousands and sparked meaningful dialogue across diverse audiences.

    Through our Paul Ramsey Award, we’ve honored giants in bioethics—thinkers like Leon Kass Gilbert Meilaender, and Dr. Robbie George—who remind us that rigorous scholarship can coexist with moral courage. Our Paul Ramsey Institute now celebrates over 50 graduates and is growing.

    And let’s not forget the quieter victories—the lives touched one conversation at a time.

    I want to rewind and share a story that captures the heart of our work. In 2013, a young woman named Jessica Kern testified before the Washington, D.C., City Council alongside our founder during debates over a surrogacy bill. Jessica, featured in our film Breeders, had learned at 16 that she was born via surrogacy. She described the pain of feeling like a product, carrying a “price tag” in a system that prioritized adult desires over children’s identities. Her courage to speak out, amplified by our film, challenged lawmakers to consider the human cost of surrogacy and inspired countless others to question the ethics of an industry that often ignores its consequences. Stories like Jessica’s—public yet deeply personal—are the soul of our mission.

    I can think of others, such as the young women who, after watching one of our films, reconsiders her decision to pursue egg selling. I think about the men and women who email me sharing their personal stories and struggles with infertility. One couple recently wrote, “Through your organization we have become increasingly uncomfortable with doing IVF and the ethics with it. We just want to make sure what we are doing is moral, and healthy and helpful for the child and for us.” I think of the policymaker who cites our groundbreaking research on surrogate mothers to draft legislation banning commercial surrogacy in their country. These moments—some public, most quiet—are the threads of a tapestry woven over 25 years, a testament to what’s possible when compassion meets conviction.

    And yet, as we celebrate, we know the road ahead is steep. The challenges we face today are complex. Artificial intelligence is raising questions about personhood and autonomy. Genetic editing technologies like CRISPR and preimplantation genetic testing tempt us with godlike power to design life itself. The fertility industry is inventing new ways to profit off of women and children with little oversight. And debates over gender and identity are reshaping culture, medicine, and law. We are navigating a ship in a culture increasingly confused about what it means to be male, female, embodied, and whole. As I hope I have made clear in the stories I’ve shared, these aren’t abstract issues—they touch real lives, real families, real futures.

    Tonight, I stand here filled with optimism, despite the challenges, because I know the strength of this organization and this community. You- Our supporters. Our donors. Our allies. Our skeptics who asked hard questions and helped sharpen our focus-You have carried us through 25 years of impact.

    Your donations have funded our films, our research, our outreach, and the next generation of scholars through our prestigious Paul Ramsey Institute. Your encouragement has given us the courage to speak truth, even when we might get cancelled. Your prayers and partnership have reminded us we’re not alone. And your presence here tonight is a powerful declaration that you believe in a world where every life is valued, where technology bends toward justice, and where dignity is non-negotiable.

    Now, let’s dream together about the future. Picture a world where no woman is pressured to sell her body or her children for profit. A world where children are welcomed as gifts, not products designed to order. A world where science heals without harming, where the vulnerable are shielded, and where truth cuts through confusion like a lighthouse in a storm. That’s the world CBC is fighting for, and we need your help to build it.

    We dream of expanding our educational reach—creating accessible, thoughtful toolkits for schools, homeschoolers, churches, and communities to navigate complex bioethical issues with clarity and confidence.

    We’ll continue to inform and inspire through compelling films and impactful writing. A new book is on the horizon, and new films are in the works.

    We are developing a digital hub of resources for women and children harmed by Big Fertility, so when someone reaches out after experiencing exploitation or coercion, we can respond with compassion and practical guidance on the path to healing.

    Our work on the ethical, medical, and legal implications of third-party reproduction continues to shape conversations across the globe—crossing ideological divides and cultural boundaries. Because no matter where you live or what you believe, the human longing for dignity, connection, and truth is universal.

    We envision building on this momentum through expanded research and the creation of a CBC Network Research Institute—a dedicated space for rigorous study, data collection, and thought leadership in bioethics.

    At the same time, as laws and policies around the world shift at an unprecedented pace, we recognize the urgent need for a Center for Bioethics and Public Policy—to track these changes, influence outcomes, and ensure that ethics keep pace with technology.

    But dreams don’t become reality without resources. Tonight’s gala is more than a celebration—it’s a call to action. Your generosity will fuel our next chapter. Every dollar you give extends our reach, amplifies our voice, and brings us closer to that better world.

    Let me close with one final story. Alana Newman, featured in our 2011 film Anonymous Father’s Day, grew up knowing she was donor-conceived but struggled with the void of not knowing her biological father. Through her involvement with CBC, she found a platform to share her story and advocate for others like her. After the film’s release, Alana spoke at events and wrote publicly, saying that the film gave her the courage to demand better protections for donor-conceived children, who’s right to know their origins is often ignored. Her voice, amplified by our work, has reached thousands. That’s the ripple effect of our work—one life, one story, one community at a time.

    Twenty-five years ago, we planted a seed. It grew—not because the world was ready for it, but because the world needed it. We will continue to be the voice in the room that says: “Slow down. Ask questions. Consider the cost.” In a culture that often confuses progress with wisdom, we are here to remind people that human beings are not machines. That children are not products. That women’s bodies are not commodities. And that ethics must never be an afterthought—it must be the foundation.

    We are not anti-technology, but we are pro-human. And in today’s landscape, that stance is not only necessary—it’s radical.

    Here’s to another radical 25 years. Your encouragement fuels us. Your questions challenge us. And your presence reminds us that we are not alone.

     

    The post Remarks by CBC Executive Director, Kallie Fell, at the Paul Ramsey Awards Dinner appeared first on The Center for Bioethics & Culture Network.

  2. Site: southern orders
    4 days 8 hours ago




     

  3. Site: AsiaNews.it
    4 days 8 hours ago
    On the day of the 50th anniversary of the end of the war in Saigon and the reunification of the country, the experience of the Scalabrinian missionaries who stand by the families arriving in the big city from the countryside.
  4. Site: LifeNews
    4 days 8 hours ago
    Author: Brian Gibson

    About 75 people attended our Memorial Service outside the Robbinsdale abortion facility April 26 to remember the estimated 60,000 babies who lost their lives there over the past five decades.  We gathered in the backyard of our Chapel of the Innocents right next to the abortion facility, praying, singing hymns and listening to featured speakers.

    One of the speakers, Rev. Paula Ellefson, lost two of her own children there in the mid-1990s.  Her powerful testimony of fear, pain, remorse, repentance, and ultimate redemption and healing by Christ moved the crowd.

    Another powerful testimony was given by Keith Rischer, RN, the pro-lifer who found the 13 aborted babies in the dumpster behind the building in 1987 (whom Pro-Life Action Ministries buried in Resurrection Cemetery in Mendota Heights, Minn.)

    Click Like if you are pro-life to like the LifeNews Facebook page!

    (function(d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js#xfbml=1&version=v2.10"; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); }(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));

    Jennifer Loining, Executive Director, and Ann Taylor, Patient Advocate, of Crystal Women’s Clinic, formerly Robbinsdale Women’s Center, which opened across the street from the Robbinsdale abortion facility in 1992, also spoke, reporting that 4736 babies have been confirmed saved with the help of that pregnancy resource center!  Robert Smith, Associate Pastor of Hope Community Church in Corcoran, told of his experiences leading a father’s group at Robbinsdale Women’s Center.  Hope Community was very involved in praying and picketing outside the Robbinsdale abortion facility in the 1990s.

    In a providential experience similar to what happened during our Jericho March April 13 (even involving the same two sidewalk counselors), a woman showed up at the door of the Robbinsdale abortion facility (closed since the end of December) during our Memorial Service!  She is 8 weeks pregnant and abortion-minded.  She spoke Spanish and the Spanish-speaking sidewalk counselor was able to explain all the help available to her while the other sidewalk counselor retrieved Spanish literature and baby gifts from our cabinet behind our Chapel of the Innocents to give to this young woman.  Please pray that she would recognize God’s hand in our encounter with her that morning and choose life!

    Thank you for all those who came to the Memorial Service and the hundreds of others who have helped save lives at this location over the past many decades!

    LifeNews Note: Brian Gibson is the CEO of Pro-Life Action Minisitres.

    The post Pro-Life Advocates Celebrate Abortion Center’s Closure With Memorial Service appeared first on LifeNews.com.

  5. Site: OnePeterFive
    4 days 9 hours ago
    Author: Robert Lazu Kmita, PhD

    Above: Lipetsk, Russia Published in Paris in 1885, in order to protect the author from possible persecution by the Russian imperial authorities, Solovyov’s work La Russie et l’Église universelle (Russia and the Universal Church) [1] contains a section whose reading played a decisive role in my conversion from Eastern Orthodoxy to Rome. This part of Solovyov’s book bears a significant…

    Source

  6. Site: LifeNews
    4 days 9 hours ago
    Author: Alex Schadenberg

    On April 28 the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition issued an Action Alert concerning the New York assisted suicide Bill (A136 / SB 138).

    Bad news: On April 29 the New York State Assembly passed the assisted suicide bill (A136) by a 81 to 67 vote.

    We need you to contact members of the New York State Senate Health Committee (Link to Senate Health Committee) to express your opposition to Senate Bill SB 138.

    I am concerned that the assisted suicide bill is being pushed through based on a budget deal with the Governor.

    Before writing the article on April 28, I looked at the “actions” concerning the assisted suicide bill and I found no indication that the bill would be voted on so quickly.

    An article by Vaughn Golden that was published in the New York Post explained that the issue of assisted suicide was discussed in a special budget meeting. Golden reported that supporters of assisted suicide claimed that they had the votes to get the assisted suicide bill passed.

    The article did not actually state that the assisted suicide bill was part of a political “trade off” to get the budget passed, but assisted suicide was discussed in the special budget meeting. This would not be the first time that an assisted suicide bill was prioritised as part of budget negotiations.

    We urge you to contact members of the New York State Senate Health Committee (Link to Senate Health Committee) to express your opposition to assisted suicide Senate Bill SB 138.

    There are many reasons to oppose assisted suicide.

    The primary reason is that assisted suicide involves the intentional killing of a person by a lethal poison cocktail. The promoters of assisted suicide claim that this is an autonomous act, but it is not autonomous because it requires the involvement of two doctors who agree that the persons life is not worth living with one of them prescribing the lethal poison cocktail for the purpose of suicide.

    Nearly every state that has legalized assisted suicide, has expanded their law.

    The New York sponsors of the assisted suicide bill claim that it is a “tightly worded” bill. The assisted suicide lobby uses a “bait and switch” technique to sell assisted suicide with a “tightly worded bill” and if the bill passes they pressure the state to expand their laws or force them to expand their law with a court case later. (Article Link).

    Assemblywoman Amy Paulin, who is the sponsor of the bill, stated (starting at 18:40) at an event that:

    We’ve been criticized by some organizations that actually want an expansion to that but we’ve held firm because… we want to get this passed first.

    People with eating disorders are dying by assisted suicide.

    An article by Jennifer Brown that was in the Colorado Sun on March 14, 2022 reported that Dr. Jennifer Gaudiani, an internal medicine doctor who specializes in eating disorders published a paper on assisted suicide for people with Anorexia Nervosa in Colorado. Gaudiani approved assisted suicide for Anorexia Nervosa by falsely defining the condition as terminal.

    Assisted suicide creates two tier medicine

    Some suicidal people are offered suicide prevention while others are provided assisted suicide. Assisted suicide is inherently discriminatory.

    We believe in caring for people not killing them.

    Assisted suicide is an act of providing a poison cocktail to someone who is living with suicidal ideation, often related to their health concerns.

    Assisted suicide constitutes killing. We believe in caring for people not killing them at their time of need.

    The post Tell the New York Senate to Reject Assisted Suicide appeared first on LifeNews.com.

  7. Site: LifeNews
    4 days 9 hours ago
    Author: Wesley Smith

    The Canadian health care system is melting down — and yet the country still embraces radical euthanasia policies.

    Here’s a current example: A woman injured in an auto accident has waited nearly two years for a consultation with a spinal surgeon — despite now having to use a wheelchair. So, she wants to come to the U.S. for a simple diagnosis, which will cost $40,000! From the CBC story:

    A London woman injured in a car crash says she’s left with no choice but to pay to see a doctor in the United States after waiting almost two years for a diagnosis from an Ontario spine surgeon.

    Sydney Gesualdi was rear-ended at a red light in July 2023, after which she was initially diagnosed with whiplash and tissue damage. In the weeks that followed, the 25-year-old lost the ability to walk, started having trouble swallowing and speaking, and had numbness in her face and limbs.

    Click Like if you are pro-life to like the LifeNews Facebook page!

    (function(d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js#xfbml=1&version=v2.10"; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); }(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));

    “None of these symptoms have gone away, and it’s been almost two years,” Gesualdi said. “I’m 25 and I can’t walk.”

    She now has to use a wheelchair and wears a neck brace at all times. Gesualdi’s family physician has referred her to eight doctors at spinal clinics across the province, but so far, she’s been denied a consultation.

    CBC News has seen the rejections from Toronto Western Hospital, London Health Sciences Centre (LHSC) and Trillium Spine Centre. Wait times and heavy caseloads are cited as the reason for not taking the patient, as well as the condition potentially being outside the scope of practice.

    What a bitter tragedy. Ill and disabled Canadians with non-life-threatening but serious conditions have no assurance of prompt medical care, and some people wait in agony for many months — or, as in this case, years — to receive proper clinical services.

    At the same time, in Canada, disabled and non-terminally-ill patients are eligible for euthanasia, and the homicide can take place within 90 days of the patient’s being deemed qualified. For patients whose deaths are “reasonably foreseeable,” there is no waiting time required once eligibility has been established.

    It may also be far less difficult to secure a death doctor than a treating physician, since the killing process is much faster. As a result, there have already been cases in which euthanasia was chosen by patients precisely because proper care was so long in coming. What a travesty.

    The U.K. has some of the same access problems, and it is perilously close to legalizing assisted suicide anyway. Meanwhile, assisted suicide might become legal in Delaware and perhaps other blue states this year.

    None are so blind as those who refuse to see.

    LifeNews.com Note: Wesley J. Smith, J.D., is a special consultant to the Center for Bioethics and Culture and a bioethics attorney who blogs at Human Exeptionalism.

    The post Canadian Woman Who Can’t Walk After Accident Has Waited Two Years to See a Surgeon appeared first on LifeNews.com.

  8. Site: Zero Hedge
    4 days 10 hours ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    Sour Patch Kids, Oreos, Ritz Demand Slides Across North America, Says Mondelez

    A slowdown in economic activity, combined with growing tariff uncertainty, appears to be curbing consumer appetite for highly processed junk food. The latest trends show a declining demand for sweet snacks in North America as more shoppers shift their spending toward real food, such as meat, vegetables, and eggs. 

    Mondelez International — the maker of Sour Patch Kids, Oreos, Ritz, Toblerone, Cadbury, and other highly processed food brands — reported slower-than-expected sales for the first quarter.

    Organic revenue, which excludes currency fluctuations and one-time items, increased 3.1%, falling short of the Bloomberg consensus estimate of 3.5%. Notably, sales in North America declined during the quarter

    On an earnings call, Mondelez CEO Dirk Van de Put told analysts: "I really do not expect to see a significant improvement in consumer confidence in the near term in the US." 

    "Two, three years ago consumers would easily pay above $4 for a pack of biscuits," Van de Put said adding, "We're now seeing that we need to be below $4 and ideally below $3."

    Mondelez noted that shoppers are beginning to prioritize real food — if that's meat, vegetables, and eggs — over snacks, chips, and candy. Also, lower-income consumers are pivoting towards smaller packages, while higher-income consumers are searching for larger value bundles. 

    Mondelez reiterated its full-year guidance and warned profit will slide 10% this year "due to unprecedented cocoa cost inflation."

    Weighing in on the North American junk food slowdown, Goldman analysts Leah Jordan and Eli Thompson offered clients their first take on Mondelez's first-quarter results and its unchanged full-year outlook:

    1. North America came in softer-than-expected on the back of retailer destocking and softer cracker demand as the consumer remains value-focused;

    2. chocolate elasticity tracked in-line with expectations, although more pricing is still to come; and

    3. MDLZ reiterated its FY25 guide in constant currency while potential upside is likely to be reinvested throughout the year to support potential growth in FY26

    The key takeaway for the North American market:

    • North America softer-than-expected: Organic net sales in North America came in softer-than-expected at -3.6% (vs GS/consensus of flat/+0.1%), largely due to retailer destocking (-250 bps), while segment profitability also missed. The destocking impact should be one time in nature, but we do not expect it to reverse as we have heard from retailers that this effort has been driven by efficiency gains. Additionally, MDLZ noted softer demand for crackers (vs cookies), although both categories are holding up relatively better than other parts of snacking, plus the company is holding share due to investments in price pack architecture and key activations. Additionally, management spoke to increasing promotional activity by peers in crackers, and we see greater private label competition in the category as well. Regarding consumer behavior, the company noted a shift to smaller pack sizes by the lower end and toward multi-packs for upper income cohorts, along with a shift in channels toward dollar stores, clubs, and value retailers.

    Details about the cocoa market:

    • Chocolate elasticity tracking in-line, although more pricing still to come: MDLZ indicated elasticity within chocolate tracked in-line with expectations at -0.5%, while it gained share in the category. However, more pricing will be implemented in the spring with management taking a wait and see approach while expressing confidence in its chocolate strategy with a range of price points. The company expects a top line acceleration throughout the year, supported by both pricing and volumes, with Easter strength noted for 2Q and pricing negotiations are now complete in Europe (vs a disruption last year). By region, management highlighted solid Easter chocolate demand for Europe/UK, Brazil, and Australia, with stable YTD elasticities noted for Europe and Emerging Markets. Notably, MDLZ indicated greater elasticity for chocolate in the U.S. vs ROW with volumes tracking down -5%, which is a negative read-through for HSY.

    Notes on guidance:

    • Reiterated FY25 guide with potential upside expected to be reinvested: MDLZ reiterated its FY25 guidance with an adj EPS decline of -10% (constant currency), noting potential upside would likely be reinvested (e.g., 1Q beat planned to be reinvested in marketing this year), while the tariff impact remains small. FY25 organic sales guidance was also reiterated at +5%, with sequential improvements supported by both volume and pricing. We also expect a gross margin improvement throughout the year tied to its pricing action. Regarding FY26, MDLZ expects EPS growth y/y, but management stopped short on the magnitude of potential ranges given cocoa uncertainty. For cocoa, the company still sees a supply/demand surplus with further demand destruction likely (as some will likely reformulate). Furthermore, the company sounded constructive on its position given lower cocoa butter prices y/y, its bigger input exposure.

    Despite key downside risks, such as an economic slowdown, Goldman analysts remained "Buy" rated on Mondelez, with a 12-month price target of $71. 

    Mondelez did not indicate that the slowdown in junk food demand was influenced by the "Make America Healthy Again" movement in any way (well at least not yet). 

    Tyler Durden Wed, 04/30/2025 - 14:25
  9. Site: Zero Hedge
    4 days 10 hours ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    Waste Of The Day: Houston Superintendent Gets Bonus After "D" Grade

    Authored by Jeremy Portnoy via RealClearInvestigations,

    Topline: The Houston Independent School District is facing a budget deficit that at one point reached $250 million, but that did not stop Superintendent Mike Miles from accepting a $126,730 bonus in April to supplement his $380,000 salary.

    Key facts: Miles’ bonus was calculated after he received a 66.7 out of 100 on his first annual evaluation from the school board that measured student performance, “executive leadership” and “vision,” according to the Houston Chronicle. A perfect score would have netted Miles a $190,000 bonus.

    The school district has struggled with funding for years, as have other large school districts in Texas. The state government has not increased public school funding since 2019 to keep pace with inflation, and yet some of Houston’s struggles come simply from overspending. Cumulative inflation from 2019 to 2024 in the U.S. was 22%, but Houston ISD increased its payroll by 29% in that timespan, according to OpenTheBooks’ database

    Last year the school released an audit detailing “overtime abuse” that forced the district to pay $26 million in one year. Auditors also found an “overreliance on purchased services” and “overuse of consultants with several other costs to overall effectiveness.”

    The district began the current school year with a $125 million deficit, but Miles asked the school board to approve an amendment that increased spending and ballooned the deficit to $250 million, forcing the district to dig into its reserves and one-time savings.

    Next year the district projects a $33 million deficit after laying off 1,500 employees. Miles is also considering closing some school buildings to cut costs.

    Search all federal, state and local government salaries and vendor spending with the AI search bot, Benjamin, at OpenTheBooks.com

    Supporting quote: Miles told the school’s community advisory committee, “I assure you, that bonus and incentive was well deserved, and I know my value, and achievement results show that.”

    Critical quote: The Houston Chronicle’s editorial board equated Miles’ 66.7 evaluation score to a “D,” claiming that “It’s a lousy grade. The kind you bury at the bottom of your backpack in hopes it disappears before somebody sees. That's essentially what the district tried to do. Chronicle reporters had to file a public information request to get a copy of the evaluation.”

    Summary: Houston is far from the only school district giving its superintendent a generous bonus, but a fiscal crisis — and a “D” grade — is not the time to do it. 

    The #WasteOfTheDay is brought to you by the forensic auditors at OpenTheBooks.com

    *  *  *

    You can support ZeroHedge by picking up a waxed canvas hat!

    Click hat... add to cart... check out... receive awesome hat...

     

    Tyler Durden Wed, 04/30/2025 - 14:05
  10. Site: AsiaNews.it
    4 days 10 hours ago
    Government-owned housing in the Sri Lankan capital, including those of former presidents, is in a state of neglect and have been invaded by pests. The decision by the National People's Power government to have its members stay in their own homes has had an impact. A committee has been set up to find ways of dealing with the situation, while neighbours complain of serious health risks and lack of maintenance.
  11. Site: The Remnant Newspaper - Remnant Articles
    4 days 10 hours ago
    Author: gaetanomasciullo@outlook.it (Gaetano Masciullo | Remnant Columnist)
    At exactly noon (Italian time) on April 29, 2025, the sixth General Congregation of the Cardinals came to an end. A few hours later, in an atmosphere suspended between reverence and secrecy, a rumor reached me—a tip-off, if we want to call it that. The kind that makes you jump out of your seat but, for intellectual honesty and professional rigor, must always be taken with caution. It said: "Parolin has already secured the majority. On the afternoon of May 8, white smoke. Pontifical name: John XXIV."
  12. Site: Henrymakow.com
    4 days 11 hours ago

    schneerson-trump-halo2.jpeg
    (left, Chabad Rebbe Menachem Schneerson)

    Please send links and comments to hmakow@gmail

    Trump's Easter Message - "We're going to be honoring Jesus Christ very powerfully all throughout our lives every day."


    "We're bringing religion back to America. Happy Easter."

    Trump belongs to the Jewish supremacist cult that is arranging a "social catastrophe," the prerequisite for the return of the Jewish antichrist and the fulfillment of End Times prophecy. He confirmed this by his visit to Schneerson's grave on Oct 7, 2024, the anniversary of the false flag (Israel knew!) Hamas attack. His role is to lead the goyim into the third Masonic Jewish world war culling. We love what Trump is doing to save America, but it is to garner support for Israel. Trump is an actor in a political reality show.

    ----

    If Carney pursues globalist policies, Canada will break up and be swallowed by the US. This may have been Trump's motive in trolling Canada which led to Poilievre's defeat. 


    Canada's New Prime Minister, Mark Carney, Is Pro-CBDC, Transgender for Kids, Climate Tyranny


    Canada's New Prime Minister, Mark Carney, Is Pro-CBDC, Transgender for Kids, Climate Tyranny

    "Globalist Mark Carney served as the governor of the Bank of Canada from 2008 to 2013 followed by a 7-year stints as the governor of the Bank of England from 2013 to 2020. Canadian journalist Dan Dicks reported that while Carney was in England, his biological daughter enrolled in the Tavistock Gender Clinic that promoted puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones for minors; Tavistock has been shut down due to causing harm. Carney and his wife have also been photographed with Jeffrey Epstein affiliate, Ghislaine Maxwell.

    OP-ED: Canada chose fear over change by handing Carney power

    Sue Ann Levy writes, "Voters who opted to return Liberals -- under the very dangerous Carney -- for a fourth time are the perfect definition of insanity."


    They voted for the same party that destroyed Canada under Justin Trudeau, --with crime and Jew hatred rampant, drug addiction celebrated, the economy in dire straits and young people's hopes for the future broken -- expecting a different result under the man who advised Trudeau repeatedly, especially in the last few years.


    fist.PNG
    George Christensen reads the entrails from the Canadian election and pronounces the oracles for the Australian federal election May 3. 
    I think by next week it will be : twice "the brinded cat hath mew'd".  


    "Let me say it straight: Pierre Poilievre was supposed to be Canada's great white hope. A conservative firebrand. A bulldog against globalist overreach. A man who once knew how to say what every working-class voter was thinking--but then? He folded. He blinked. He tried to please the media, the elites, the so-called "moderates." And what did he get in return?

    Defeat. Humiliation. A left-wing Liberal majority....Here's what they need to do--today--if they want to avoid the same fate as Canada's conservatives:




    1. Rip up the globalist script. Ditch the 2030 net-zero goals. End the UN climate agenda. Bring manufacturing home. [This means a reciprocal tariff structure] Sovereignty first--every time.
    -

    RFK Jr. Calls Out Pentagon "Chemtrail" Geoengineering Program, Points to DARPA


    RFK Jr. appeared on the Dr. Phil show and was asked by an audience member how to stop the "the stratospheric aerosol injections that are continuously peppered on us every day." Kennedy responded by saying, "That is not happening in my agency, we don't do that. It's done - we think - by DARPA and a lot of it now is coming out of the jet fuel. Those materials are put in jet fuel. I'm going to do everything in my power to stop it. We're bringing on somebody who's gonna think only about that, find out who's doing that and hold them accountable."

    -
    nicole.jpeg

    The alt media is just as bad as the legacy media in terms of clickbait and outright lying. I don't know if this is true.

    Klaus Schwab's Daughter Confesses: 'WEF Plans to Murder Billions of People'

    "Nicole Schwab, the daughter of World Economic Forum co-founder Klaus, is extensively co-operating with prosecutors in the crimes against humanity case against key figures of the global elite, sparking fear in the WEF, the UN, and the WHO that their diplomatic immunity is about to be revoked and arrest warrants issued.


    Behind the scenes, the so-called untouchables are panicking. Investigations once thought impossible are in full swing. Prosecutors are circling. The illusion of immunity is cracking, and whispers inside the International Criminal Court say we're on the brink of Nuremberg 2.0. Real names. Real trials. Real consequences

    --
    KB naively believes Trump is avoiding war

    Trump vs. Iran: Nuclear Deal II or World War III?


    Netanyahu--front man for the Zionist cabal that orchestrated 9/11--blew up the World Trade Center in order to hijack the US military to destroy "seven countries in five years," the seventh and most important being Iran. But the culmination of that plan is almost twenty years behind schedule. Pushback from realists in the US strategic establishment, who know war with Iran would be catastrophic for America, has prevented Bibi's loyalists from drawing the US into its stupidest-ever war for Israel.

    Yet Trump now stands on the precipice of that war. Caught between the proverbial rock and hard place--the strategic reality that war with Iran would destroy America and with it Trump's political prospects, and his promises to Netanyahu to countenance such a war--the occupant of the White House is ensnared in a trap of his own making.

    -

    reiner-fuellmich-hearing.png
    Latest Developments: Attorney Dr. Reiner Fuellmich sentenced to 3 years and 9 months

    He courageously stands up to a corrupt trial and judge, who sentences him to 3 years and 9 months on a phony charge of some kind of loan, to shut him up. The main witness can not or will not testify to this charge.
    https://www.globalresearch.ca/closing-argument-%e2%80%8b%e2%80%8breiner-fuellmich/5885540

    ...



    Examining the Real Egyptian History of the Hyksos, the Hebrews and the Exodus


    The Hyksos were a mysterious "Asiatic" Semitic tribe that invaded Egypt in 1782 B.C. and ruled until 1570 B.C. Then the Egyptians from Upper Egypt reunited the country and overthrew Hyksos rule. There is an active debate as to whether these were early Hebrew tribes. We say they were.

    The Hyksos were characterized as "smart, pushy and rude."
    -
    hamdi-mig.jpg
    "This is how my family was, my mother, my older brother Ahmed, my brother Basil, and my nieces Omar and Nada. We were a beautiful and quiet family, living in a beautiful house before the occupation killed them all. The house was targeted over our heads, and they were all martyred. Only my older sister and I survived, and we live alone now. Pray for us."

    A Way to Help Gaza




    U.S. Government's Bio-War Against America: 15 Historical Medical Horrors Inflicted on the American People by the Government Itself


    14. COVID-19 Vaccine Trials (2020-Present) - A Mass Depopulation Experiment
    Year: 2020-Present

    Details: Under Operation Warp Speed (President Trump), Big Pharma skipped long-term safety trials. VAERS reports reveal thousands of deaths, heart attacks, and autoimmune disorders--but the CDC buried the evidence and silenced the truth-tellers. Now, whistleblowers warn these shots contain graphene oxide, prions, and infertility agents.

    Health Ranger commentary: The U.S. government is running the largest human experiment in history--and immediate Criminal tribunals must indict those pushing these lethal injections. Where is the criminal prosecution against Fauci?

    -

    christianzionism.png
    G. Edward Griffin's "World Without Cancer" reveals the orchestrated suppression of a potential cure for cancer


    G. Edward Griffin, author of "World Without Cancer: The Story of Vitamin B17 Part 2," claims the cancer industry is a "farce." He argues that it prioritizes profits over cures through expensive conventional treatments while suppressing natural alternatives.

    Griffin argues that cancer stems from uncontrolled trophoblast cells, which he believes can be managed using vitamin B17 (found in apricot kernels and bitter almonds). He says vitamin B17 targets only malignant cells - though mainstream medicine dismisses this as unproven and dangerous.

    Griffin accuses Big Pharma, regulatory agencies and medical institutions of deliberately suppressing vitamin B17 to protect the lucrative cancer treatment industry, citing historical ties between medicine and corporate interests.


  13. Site: Zero Hedge
    4 days 11 hours ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    Sen. Josh Hawley Introduces PELOSI Act To Stop Insider-Trading

    Via American Greatness,

    Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) has reintroduced the “Preventing Elected Leaders from Owning Securities and Investments” (PELOSI) Act that would prohibit members of Congress and their families from trading stocks while in office.

    The name of the act is a direct nod in the direction of 20 term Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) whose net worth has soared from $160,000 when she was first elected in 1987 to more than $140 million in 2024.

    The bill to ban congressional stock trading is entitled the PELOSI Act, or "Preventing Elected Leaders from Owning Securities and Investments."

    I usually don't like cute names for pieces of legislation, but this one hit the nail on the head. Bravo.

    Pass it!! pic.twitter.com/pN8nicKJRx

    — Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) April 29, 2025

    Pelosi’s husband Paul, who narrowly survived a hammer attack 2022, is an investor who has made significant financial gains on stock trades that some speculate may have been based on insider information.

    Hawley first introduced the PELOSI Act in 2023 but it failed to gain traction under the Biden administration.

    Since then, the proposal has gained support on both sides of the congressional aisle and Fox News reports that President Trump has said he would “absolutely” sign the ban if it arrives on his desk.

    Hawley has been a consistent critic of members of Congress being more focused on day-trading than they are on representing their constituents.

    In a statement, Hawley said, “Americans have seen politician after politician turn a profit using information not available to the general public. It’s time we ban all members of Congress from trading and holding stocks and restore Americans’ trust in our nation’s legislative body.”

    The PELOSI Act would prohibit lawmakers and their spouses from purchasing, selling or holding stocks during the time that the lawmaker is in office.

    Lawmakers would still be able to invest in U.S. Treasury Bonds, diversified mutual funds or exchange-traded funds while in office.

    Should the PELOSI Act be signed into law, current members of Congress would have 180 days to comply with newly elected members being required to comply with in 180 days of entering office.

    Lawmakers who violate the act would be required to hand over their profits to the U.S. Treasury Department and could also face fines of up to 10% on each transaction.

    Tyler Durden Wed, 04/30/2025 - 13:25
  14. Site: AsiaNews.it
    4 days 11 hours ago
    From Kerala, 51, the Syro-Malabar prelate has served in various nunciatures in Latin America as well as the Islamic world. A few days before he was hospitalised at the Gemelli, Pope Francis picked him as prefect of the dicastery for interreligious dialogue. For the cardinal, it is imperative to look at 'a world where religious differences not only coexist peacefully but become essential elements in building peace among peoples.'
  15. Site: Zero Hedge
    4 days 11 hours ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    Oil Plunges On Report Saudis Bracing For Price War, Can "Live With Lower Oil Prices"

    It had already been a miserable month for oil, which has suffered its worst monthly performance since 2021 and also is on pace for its month of April on record... and then it got even worse when shortly before noon ET, when Reuters reported, citing multiple sources, that Saudi Arabian officials are briefing allies and industry experts to say the kingdom is unwilling to prop up the oil market with further supply cuts and can handle a prolonged period of low prices.

    This shift in Saudi policy could suggest a move toward producing more and expanding its market share, a major change after five years spent balancing the market through deep output as a leader of the OPEC+ group of oil producers. Those cuts had supported prices, in turn bolstering the oil export revenue that many oil producers rely on, but many OPEC+ members - most notably Kazakhstan - took advantage of the production restraint and blew away through their export quotas, infuriating other cartel members.

    Sure enough, Reuters notes that Riyadh has been angered by Kazakhstan and Iraq producing above their OPEC+ targets. And after pushing members to adhere to those targets and to compensate for oversupply in recent months, a frustrated Riyadh is changing tack, OPEC+ sources said.

    Saudi Arabia pushed for a larger-than-planned OPEC+ output hike in May, a decision that helped send oil prices below $60 a barrel to a 4-year low.

    And now that Kazahkstan blew it for all cartel members, everyone will share the pain equally, as lower prices are bad news for producers that rely on oil exports to fund their economies. Although producers like Saudi have a very low cost of production, they need higher oil prices to pay for government spending. When oil prices fall, many large oil-producing countries come under pressure to cut their budgets.

    And just to confirm that they are not bluffing, the Saudis appear to be briefing allies and experts that they are ready to do just that. The last time they did just that was in March 2020, just before covid shut down the global economy and briefly sent oil prices negative, sparking budget crises across all OPEC members.

    Saudi officials in recent weeks have told allies and market participants the kingdom can live with the fall in prices by raising borrowing and cutting costs, the five sources said.

    "The Saudis are ready for lower prices and may need to pull back on some major projects," one of the sources said. All sources declined to be named due to sensitivity of the issue.

    The problem is that Saudi Arabia needs oil prices above $90 to balance its budget, higher than other large OPEC producers such as the United Arab Emirates, according to the International Monetary Fund (IMF). As a result, Riyadh may need to delay or cut back some projects due to the price drop, analysts have said.

    OPEC+, which besides the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries also includes allies such as Russia, may decide to speed up output hikes again in June, OPEC+ sources have said. OPEC+ is cutting output by over 5 million barrels or 5% of global supply, to which Saudi Arabia is contributing two-fifths.

    Russia, the second largest exporter in OPEC+ behind Saudi Arabia, is aware of Riyadh's plans for faster output increases, said two of the five sources who are familiar with the Russian thinking and conversations with Riyadh. Even so, Russia would prefer the group stick to slower output increases.

    Saudi Arabia and Russia, the de facto leaders of OPEC+, make the biggest contributions to OPEC+ cuts. Russia's budget balances at about $70 a barrel and the Kremlin's spending is on the rise due to the Russian war in Ukraine.
    Russia may see a further fall in revenue as prices for its discounted, sanctioned oil could fall below $50 a barrel as a result of OPEC+ output rises, one of the two sources said.

    Theories on the apparent change in Saudi strategy range from punishing OPEC+ members exceeding their quotas to a move to fight for market share after ceding ground to non-OPEC+ producers such as the United States and Guyana. Higher output may also be a fillip to U.S. President Donald Trump, who has called for OPEC to boost output to help keep U.S. gasoline prices down.

    Trump is due to visit Saudi Arabia in May and could offer Riyadh an arms package and a nuclear agreement. OPEC+ decided to triple its planned output increase to 411,000 bpd.

    That still leaves OPEC+ holding back more than 5 million bpd, curbs the group aims to unwind by the end of 2026. 

    "We would still call this a 'managed' unwind of cuts and not a fight for market share," UBS analyst Giovanni Staunovo said.

    “This confirms the market’s fears that Saudi Arabia’s accelerated unwinds were not temporary, but a long-term strategy shift,” said Rebecca Babin, a senior energy trader at CIBC Private Wealth Group. It raises the question of whether “Saudi is going to repeat the 2020 playbook to dramatically increase production.”

    For now the market is voting "yes", and the news sent WTI tumbling as much as 4%,or more than $2 to just under $58, the lowest price since early 2021 (and a level which was only briefly breached after Trump's Liberation Day sent oil to $55 before rebounding rapidly).

    OPEC+ rocked the crude market in early April, with a surprise decision to increase supply in May by 411,000 barrels a day, the equivalent of three monthly tranches from a previous plan. Morgan Stanley has said it expects a “meaningful surplus” to develop over time, while JPMorgan Chase & Co. warned the cartel may accelerate planned production increases at a meeting next week.

    Beyond OPEC+, non-cartel nations are also expected to add supplies, including drillers in Canada and Guyana, feeding concerns about a global glut.

    At the same time, hopes are fading that there will be quick breakthroughs in US-led trade negotiations, weighing on the outlook for energy demand. The US economy contracted for the first time since 2022 in the first quarter as a result of a surge in pre-tariff imports and softer consumer spending. In China, factory activity slipped into the worst contraction since December 2023, revealing early damage from the trade war.

    Tyler Durden Wed, 04/30/2025 - 13:08
  16. Site: Rorate Caeli
    4 days 11 hours ago
    (The document below may be downloaded as a PDF here.)An Open Letter to the Cardinals of the Holy Roman Church Your Eminences:The following document emerged from discussions over the past year among theologians, pastors, and canonists, who had been encouraged to produce this document by a senior cardinal. Originally our thought had been to seek for signatories—knowing, as we do, how many notable Peter Kwasniewskihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05136784193150446335noreply@blogger.com
  17. Site: Zero Hedge
    4 days 11 hours ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    Appeals Court Upholds Restrictions On Deportations Of Venezuelans From US

    Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

    A federal appeals court on April 29 turned down the Trump administration’s bid to block restrictions on deporting Venezuelans from Colorado.

    Venezuelan illegal immigrants deported from the United States disembark from a Conviasa Airlines plane upon arrival at Simon Bolivar International Airport in Maiquetia, Venezuela, on March 24, 2025. Juan Barreto/AFP via Getty Images

    The government did not show that it is likely to be irreparably harmed if a lower court order remains in place, a unanimous three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit ruled.

    Under court precedent, a party seeking a stay pending appeal must show it will likely be irreparably harmed absent a stay.

    U.S. District Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney recently issued a temporary restraining order requiring the Trump administration to give Venezuelans arrested for alleged links to the Tren de Aragua gang three weeks’ notice before deportation.

    The order applies to all noncitizens in Colorado who were, are, or will be subject to President Donald Trump’s March invocation of the Alien Enemies Act. The president at the time said that Tren de Aragua had invaded the United States, and he directed officials to arrest and deport its members.

    All members of the class are in federal custody. And given the important unresolved issues under the Alien Enemies Act (AEA) and the ruling of the United States Supreme Court that no one in that proceeding be removed under the AEA until further order of that Court ... there is no realistic possibility that the government could remove any member of the class from this country before final expiration of the TRO on May 6, 2025,” the 10th Circuit panel stated.

    Lawyers for the government and the plaintiffs in the case did not respond to early morning requests for comment.

    Four factors must be met to secure a stay pending appeal. The appeals court did not address the other three factors, which include presenting a strong showing that a party is likely to succeed in the case since the irreparable harm standard was not met, the judges said.

    The panel consisted of U.S. Circuit Judges Harris L. Hartz, Gregory A. Phillips, and Joel M. Carson.

    Government lawyers had said in filings that Sweeney lacked jurisdiction to halt deportations because the plaintiffs were not in custody at the time of the ruling. Immigration and Customs Enforcement had released the plaintiffs because it determined they were not subject to the Alien Enemies Act.

    The lawyers also argued that the restraining order “irreparably harms the United States’ conduct of foreign policy” because it “usurps the President’s statutory and constitutional authority to address what he has identified as an invasion or predatory incursion.”

    Attorneys representing the Venezuelans had said in response that the restraining order was proper because the government had been giving people arrested under the invocation just 24 hours’ notice of removal, which they said did not achieve due process.

    Tyler Durden Wed, 04/30/2025 - 13:05
  18. Site: Mises Institute
    4 days 11 hours ago
    Author: Connor O'Keeffe
    The first 100 days of the second Trump administration have made it clear that those who want the foreign policy status quo to continue are serious about doing what it takes to accomplish their goals, while those who want to change it are not.
  19. Site: Mises Institute
    4 days 11 hours ago
    Author: Gary Galles
    Freedom in One Lesson is an attempt to assemble an extensive collection of Leonard Read's best, most powerful sustained arguments on behalf of liberty. Leonard Read's goal was to plant the seeds of liberty, so society and individuals could blossom to their fullest potential.
  20. Site: The Remnant Newspaper
    4 days 11 hours ago
  21. Site: LifeNews
    4 days 11 hours ago
    Author: S.A. McCarthy

    A major study just revealed that the abortion drug mifepristone is far more dangerous than U.S. health agencies have admitted, prompting calls for President Donald Trump’s Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to reinstate more stringent safeguards surrounding the drug’s prescription and use, reinvestigate the health risks, and if warranted, reconsider its approval altogether.

    The Ethics and Public Policy Center (EPPC) released its report Monday, revealing that the rate of serious adverse complications associated with mifepristone is at least 22 times higher than the 0.5% touted by the FDA.

    In a letter to FDA Commissioner Marty Makary, Senator Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) joined the EPPC in demanding that the guidelines for administering mifepristone originally in place when the FDA approved the drug in 2000 be reinstated.

    “An alarming new study has revealed that the safety risk of the chemical abortion drug, mifepristone, are far greater than the FDA currently acknowledges,” Hawley wrote. He continued, “I urge you to follow this new data and take all appropriate action to restore critical safeguards on the use of mifepristone. The health and safety of American women depend on it.” The senator concluded, “The time to act is now. It is time to revisit and restore the FDA’s longstanding safety measures governing mifepristone.”

    HELP LIFENEWS SAVE BABIES FROM ABORTION! Please help LifeNews.com with a donation!

    Makary pledged last week to review new data regarding the safety of mifepristone, although he had not made a similar pledge when pressed by Hawley on the issue during his confirmation hearing before the Senate. Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. had previously told Republican senators that he plans to “study the safety of mifepristone” and implement policies consistent with the president’s position on the abortion drug. Kennedy said that the president “has not yet taken a stand on how to regulate it. Whatever he does, I will implement those policies.”

    In comments to The Washington Stand, Mary Szoch, director of the Center for Human Dignity at Family Research Council, said, “I am encouraged to know that FDA Commissioner Makary will remain true to his roots as a scientist and examine all of the data on mifepristone. The newest data shows one in 10 women has a serious adverse event following the use of mifepristone.” She added, “I look forward to seeing the steps Director Makary will take in light of how dangerous this drug is for women.”

    Regarding the results of the EPPC study, Szoch stated, “The FDA has never thoroughly investigated the impact of mifepristone on all women.” Noting the high rate of serious complications associated with mifepristone — more than one in nine women — she continued, “That number doesn’t even begin to touch the number of women who have serious psychological issues after seeing their clearly recognizable unborn baby dead in the toilet as the result of a mifepristone abortion. The FDA must re-examine mifepristone and revoke its approval.”

    EPPC President Ryan Anderson, who co-authored the study, appeared on Monday night’s “Washington Watch” to discuss his findings. He clarified, “The major takeaway here is that it’s a 22-times-higher rate of serious adverse events for women who take the chemical abortion drug than what the FDA claims on the label.” He continued, “Why do we see such poor outcomes? Both the Obama and the Biden administrations got rid of almost all of the major safety protections that the FDA originally required when they approved of the pill. So what we’re calling on the Trump FDA to do is … reinstate those original safety provisions.”

    Anderson also noted that, since the FDA has removed the requirement that mifepristone must be prescribed by a physician and dispensed and consumed in the physician’s office, the abortion drug has been increasingly ordered online or via “telehealth mail order” and has even been shipped across state lines, including into states with strong pro-life laws in place. He explained that “many blue states” are “mailing the abortion pill across state lines.”

    Noting that the president has previously averred that the issue of abortion ought to be left to the states, Anderson continued, “Well, you can’t leave it to the states if California is mailing abortion pills to the other 49 states. You can’t make America healthy again if you have a 10.9% rate of serious adverse events. And you can’t undo all the stupid things Biden and Obama did unless you also undo what they did to the abortion pill. So that’s what we’re calling on the Trump FDA to do here.”

    Also on Monday night’s episode of “Washington Watch,” Dr. Donna Harrison, director of research for the American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists, said that her experience as an obstetrician/gynecologist confirms the EPPC study’s findings. She explained that doctors “across the country are seeing similar kinds of things in the [emergency room], seeing women with hemorrhages, women with tissue left inside, women who have ectopic pregnancies that never should have gotten the abortion pill at all. And they got it because they never had an in-patient visit, they never had an ultrasound,” because the FDA does not require it.

    Harrison also explained that the FDA based its guidelines on clinical studies, which do not provide accurate data that corresponds to how the abortion drug is administered and used in the real world, especially without stringent safeguards in place. “Clinical trials are done under very controlled circumstances,” Harrison said. She noted that women who participated in these clinical trials had ultrasound results, were tested for ectopic pregnancies, were within a certain gestational timeframe, and were excluded from the trial if they did not meet specific criteria. She said, “So these trials sought out healthy women where their gestational age, the dating of the pregnancy, is perfectly known. And then they’re followed very, very, very carefully. That’s not what happens in the real world.”

    Harrison detailed, “In the real world, Sally Smith, who may be 14, gets online, gives her gift credit card, and gets mailed mifeprex [the brand name for mifepristone]. She has no idea how far along she is. She may think that she’s eight weeks. And I’ve seen cases where women were told, ‘Oh, you’re eight weeks along,’ and they take the mifeprex and they deliver a 22-week baby who could have survived if that baby had been delivered under the right circumstances. It’s this kind of horrendous care…”

    Anderson also criticized the FDA’s handling of the dangers of mifepristone. “[W]hat we saw in the Obama years and now, most recently, from the Biden administration, it was clearly politicized medicine to get rid of these original safety provisions,” Anderson continued. He noted that regulations such as requiring multiple in-person physician visits, requiring a physician to prescribe mifepristone, requiring that the abortion drug be dispensed and consumed in the physician’s office, requiring a follow-up appointment, and requiring adverse complications be reported were eliminated by the Obama and Biden administrations. Anderson stated, “This isn’t looking out for the best interest of women. Certainly not looking out for the best interest of their unborn children.”

    LifeNews Note: S.A. McCarthy serves as a news writer at The Washington Stand.

    The post Experts Urge Trump to Stop Abortion Pill After Study Shows Huge Complication Rates appeared first on LifeNews.com.

  22. Site: Euthanasia Prevention Coalition
    4 days 11 hours ago
        Canadian election euthanasia (MAiD) analysis.

    Join the EPC Zoom event on Monday May 5 at 12 noon (Eastern Time) / 9 am (Pacific Time)

    EPC Executive Director, Alex Schadenberg, EPC President, Gordon Friesen and Kelsi Sheren will discuss the Canadian election results and our concerns for the immediate future.

    Gordon FriesenRegister for the Zoom Meeting (Registration Link). You will receive the meeting link, after you register.

    We will discuss our concern that: 
    • euthanasia for mental illness alone is currently scheduled to begin on March 17, 2027. 
    • We will also discuss the push to extend the law to include euthanasia by advance request and euthanasia for "mature minors."
    • Alex Schadenberg will unveil the latest EPC strategy / campaign.
    Register for the Zoom Meeting (Registration Link).
    You will receive the meeting link, after you register.
  23. Site: LifeNews
    4 days 11 hours ago
    Author: Ireland Owens

    One in ten patients experience a “serious adverse event” after taking the abortion pill, according to a study released Monday by the Ethics and Public Policy Center (EPPC), a conservative think tank and advocacy group.

    The study found that 10.93% of women experienced sepsis, infection, hemorrhaging, or another serious adverse event within 45 days after a mifepristone abortion. The real-world rate of serious adverse events after mifepristone abortions is at least 22 times as high as the summary figure of “less than 0.5%” in clinical trials reported on the drug label, according to the study.

    Mifepristone, when used together with another medication called misoprostol, is used to have an abortion during the first ten weeks of pregnancy, according to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Danco Laboratories, a pharmaceutical distributor based in Manhattan, distributes mifepristone under the brand name Mifeprex, and claims on their website that the drug is “safe and effective.”

    Get the latest pro-life news and information on X (Twitter). //

    The study, which the EPPC claims to be the largest-known review of the abortion pill conducted in the U.S., is based on analysis of data from an all-payer insurance claims database that includes 865,727 prescribed mifepristone abortions from 2017 to 2023.

    “Danco Laboratories markets Mifeprex as ‘the safe and effective abortion pill,’ but our research shows that mifepristone abortion, as currently practiced in the U.S., is not safe and effective,” the EPPC wrote in the study. “The manufacturer and the FDA rely on the results of 10 clinical trials with a total of 30,966 participants, less than 0.5% of whom reportedly experienced serious adverse reactions. In contrast, we analyzed real-world insurance claims data for 865,727 prescribed mifepristone abortions, broadly representative of women who obtain mifepristone abortions in the U.S. today, and we find a serious adverse event rate of 10.93%—at least 22 times as high as the summary figure reported on the drug label.”

    “Simply stated, mifepristone, as used in real-world conditions, is not ‘safe and effective,’” the think tank went on to write.

    The EPPC’s study was written by its President Ryan T. Anderson and Director of Data Analysis Jamie Bryan Hall.

    A similar study released by the Foundation for the Restoration of America (FFROA) on April 25 also found that more than 10% of women who underwent a mifepristone abortion “experience a serious adverse event.”

    FFROA founder Doug Truax, who commissioned the study, told the DCNF in a statement: “These shocking findings should alert all women that the abortion pills are extremely dangerous to their well-being — a conclusion completely at odds with what the FDA tells us. Once again, we are learning that our government will put political ideology above science, data, and the health and safety of its citizens.”

    “This bombshell report is further evidence that our government uses phony data and politicized science to lie to its people. In this case, those lies further political ideologies rather than the health, safety, and well-being of women and children,” Truax added.

    With many states implementing pro-life laws after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in June 2022, many women have used telehealth — using technology to deliver healthcare services remotely — to bypass abortion bans. As of December 2023, telehealth constituted 19% of abortions in the U.S. healthcare system, according to the Society of Family Planning’s #WeCount project.

    In June 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled that a lawsuit challenging the FDA’s approval of mifepristone lacked standing, allowing the drug to remain widely available.

    The number of abortions in the U.S. has grown in recent years partially due to the increased availability and use of the abortion pill, which accounted for 63% of abortions in 2023, according to a March 2024 study from the Guttmacher Institute.

    FDA Commissioner Marty Makary notably said on April 24 that he has “no plans to take action” to limit the availability of mifepristone.

    Danco Laboratories did not respond to the Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.

    LifeNews Note: Ireland Owens writes for Daily Caller. Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience.

    The post Sepsis, Hemorrhaging, Infection. These are Major Problems Women Experience After the Abortion Pill appeared first on LifeNews.com.

  24. Site: Euthanasia Prevention Coalition
    4 days 12 hours ago
    This article was published by National Review online on April 23, 2025.

    Wesley SmithBy Wesley J Smith

    The Canadian health care system is melting down — and yet the country still embraces radical euthanasia policies.

    Here’s a current example: A woman injured in an auto accident has waited nearly two years for a consultation with a spinal surgeon — despite now having to use a wheelchair. So, she wants to come to the U.S. for a simple diagnosis, which will cost $40,000! From the CBC story:
    A London woman injured in a car crash says she’s left with no choice but to pay to see a doctor in the United States after waiting almost two years for a diagnosis from an Ontario spine surgeon.

    Sydney Gesualdi was rear-ended at a red light in July 2023, after which she was initially diagnosed with whiplash and tissue damage. In the weeks that followed, the 25-year-old lost the ability to walk, started having trouble swallowing and speaking, and had numbness in her face and limbs.

    “None of these symptoms have gone away, and it’s been almost two years,” Gesualdi said. “I’m 25 and I can’t walk.”

    She now has to use a wheelchair and wears a neck brace at all times. Gesualdi’s family physician has referred her to eight doctors at spinal clinics across the province, but so far, she’s been denied a consultation.

    CBC News has seen the rejections from Toronto Western Hospital, London Health Sciences Centre (LHSC) and Trillium Spine Centre. Wait times and heavy caseloads are cited as the reason for not taking the patient, as well as the condition potentially being outside the scope of practice. 
    What a bitter tragedy. Ill and disabled Canadians with non-life-threatening but serious conditions have no assurance of prompt medical care, and some people wait in agony for many months — or, as in this case, years — to receive proper clinical services.

    At the same time, in Canada, disabled and non-terminally-ill patients are eligible for euthanasia, and the homicide can take place within 90 days of the patient’s being deemed qualified. For patients whose deaths are “reasonably foreseeable,” there is no waiting time required once eligibility has been established.

    It may also be far less difficult to secure a death doctor than a treating physician, since the killing process is much faster. As a result, there have already been cases in which euthanasia was chosen by patients precisely because proper care was so long in coming. What a travesty.

    The U.K. has some of the same access problems, and it is perilously close to legalizing assisted suicide anyway. Meanwhile, assisted suicide might become legal in Delaware and perhaps other blue states this year.

    None are so blind as those who refuse to see.
  25. Site: LifeNews
    4 days 12 hours ago
    Author: Hudson Crozier

    A locally-run Republican Party building in New York has been vandalized just weeks after similar attacks were reported in two locations.

    The New York State Republican Party said in a Tuesday press release that its Albany headquarters was defaced with “Nazi imagery” days after “an initial act of vandalism that included swastikas.” The incident comes just days after the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that it is prosecuting a leftist suspect in a recent arson attack on a New Mexico GOP building as Republican leaders call for civility.

    “This was not a random act of vandalism — it was an escalation of political hatred deliberately aimed at intimidating Republicans and silencing our voices,” Republican New York Rep. Elise Stefanik said in the press release. She called the vandalism “a disgusting criminal act and a direct threat to the hardworking staff of the New York Republican Party.”

    Get the latest pro-life news and information on X (Twitter). //

    A photo obtained by the Daily Caller News Foundation showed the word “Nazis” written on a pillar along with an arrow pointing upward at the building. The New York GOP told the DCNF that the vandalism occurred overnight. The organization posted on X that it also found swastikas taped to the building on April 16 with a sign that read, “If this is not what you stand for, prove it.”

    The DOJ announced April 14 it had charged self-described “queer” scientist with property damage offenses for allegedly firebombing the Albuquerque, New Mexico GOP headquarters on March 30 and later a Tesla dealership.

    The Albany Police Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment from the DCNF.

    “We must never tolerate political violence, regardless of the target,” Stefanik said. “It’s time to restore respect, dialogue, and decency to our political discourse.”

    Republican Rep. Mike Lawler of New York accused Democratic leaders of “creating a climate of hostility that emboldens and encourages these acts” with “reckless rhetoric.”

    “Any form of political violence or intimidation is unacceptable, and the perpetrators must be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law,” Lawler said.

    LifeNews Note: Hudson Crozier writes for Daily Caller. Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience.

    The post Republican Office Vandalized for the 3rd Time in a Month appeared first on LifeNews.com.

  26. Site: Fr. Z's Blog
    4 days 12 hours ago
    Author: frz@wdtprs.com (Fr. John Zuhlsdorf)
    At 6:05 the sun began to appear in Rome. It’s evening disappearing act commences at 20:10. The Ave Maria Bell is in it’s 20:30 cycle. In the NO calendar we celebrate St. Pius V and in the VO, St. Catherine … Read More →
  27. Site: Euthanasia Prevention Coalition
    4 days 12 hours ago
    Alex Schadenberg
    Executive Director, Euthanasia Prevention Coalition

    New York State LegislatureOn April 28 the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition issued an Action Alert concerning the New York assisted suicide Bill (A136 / SB 138).

    Bad news: On April 29 the New York State Assembly passed the assisted suicide bill by a 81 to 67 vote.

    We need you to contact members of the New York State Senate Health Committee (Link to Senate Health Committee) to express your opposition to Senate Bill SB 138.

    I am concerned that the assisted suicide bill is being pushed through based on a budget deal with the Governor.

    Before writing the article on April 28, I looked at the "actions" concerning the assisted suicide bill and I found no indication that the bill would be voted on so quickly.

    An article by Vaughn Golden that was published in the New York Post explained that the issue of assisted suicide was discussed in a special budget meeting. Golden reported that supporters of assisted suicide claimed that they had the votes to get the assisted suicide bill passed.

    The article did not actually state that the assisted suicide bill was part of a political "trade off" to get the budget passed, but assisted suicide was discussed in the special budget meeting. This would not be the first time that an assisted suicide bill was prioritised as part of budget negotiations.

    We urge you to contact members of the New York State Senate Health Committee (Link to Senate Health Committee) to express your opposition to assisted suicide Senate Bill SB 138.

    There are many reasons to oppose assisted suicide.

    The primary reason is that assisted suicide involves the intentional killing of a person by a lethal poison cocktail. The promoters of assisted suicide claim that this is an autonomous act, but it is not autonomous because it requires the involvement of two doctors who agree that the persons life is not worth living with one of them prescribing the lethal poison cocktail for the purpose of suicide.

    Nearly every state that has legalized assisted suicide, has expanded their law.

    The New York sponsors of the assisted suicide bill claim that it is a "tightly worded" bill. The assisted suicide lobby uses a "bait and switch" technique to sell assisted suicide with a "tightly worded bill" and if the bill passes they pressure the state to expand their laws or force them to expand their law with a court case later. (Article Link).

    Assemblywoman Amy Paulin, who is the sponsor of the bill, stated (starting at 18:40) at an event that:We've been criticized by some organizations that actually want an expansion to that but we've held firm because... we want to get this passed first.People with eating disorders are dying by assisted suicide.

    An article by Jennifer Brown that was in the Colorado Sun on March 14, 2022 reported that Dr. Jennifer Gaudiani, an internal medicine doctor who specializes in eating disorders published a paper on assisted suicide for people with Anorexia Nervosa in Colorado. Gaudiani approved assisted suicide for Anorexia Nervosa by falsely defining the condition as terminal.

    Assisted suicide creates two tier medicine

    Some suicidal people are offered suicide prevention while others are provided assisted suicide. Assisted suicide is inherently discriminatory.

    We believe in caring for people not killing them.

    Assisted suicide is an act of providing a poison cocktail to someone who is living with suicidal ideation, often related to their health concerns.

    Assisted suicide constitutes killing. We believe in caring for people not killing them at their time of need.
  28. Site: Zero Hedge
    4 days 12 hours ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    The Spanish Power Outage: A Catastrophe Created By Political Design & A Warning To The World

    Authored by Daniel Lacalle,

    On April 23rd, I participated in a conference at the European Parliament on the future of nuclear energy with experts from all over Europe, where I warned that, with the current energy policies, blackouts will be the norm, not a coincidence.

    The shortsighted and sectarian policy of the activists who populate the government has led us to the worst blackout in the history of Spain. We have been without communication or electricity for nearly eleven hours.

    This blackout, with the immediate collapse of fifteen gigawatts of power in the system, is the consequence of a policy that penalizes base energy, key to providing stability to the system, and plunders the energy sector.

    Governments have been dedicated to closing nuclear power plants, making them unviable with abusive and confiscatory taxation; penalizing investment in distribution with absurd regulations; imposing a volatile and intermittent energy mix; and burdening energy with elevated taxes and administrative delays. What could go wrong? Everything.

    And it happened.

    Renewable energies, while essential in a balanced energy mix, cannot provide safety and stability due to their volatility and intermittent nature. That’s why it is essential to have a balanced system with base-load energy that operates all the time, such as hydropower, nuclear, and natural gas as backup.

    Destroying access to nuclear energy with unnecessary closures and confiscatory taxation has been part of the fundamental causes of the disaster and the blackout.

    Last week, they had to close the remaining nuclear power plants because their taxes are so high that they cannot cover their fixed costs. They have destroyed nuclear plants’ economics by political design. Moreover, those plants would have provided stability to the grid if national and regional governments, which use nuclear and hydroelectric power as cash cows for their revenue-hungry policies, had prioritized supply security over energy sectarianism.

    There is much more.

    Spain and Portugal produce electricity with more than 60% solar and wind energy. Hydraulic, nuclear, and combined cycle gas plants must cover the shortfalls in solar and wind production, which is intermittent. There is no possibility of having a stable and secure system with a continuous supply if the electrical grid is not balanced to avoid a total blackout.
    According to Euronews, France sometimes produces too much electricity, leading the network operator RTE to disconnect solar or wind sites. The consumer pays taxes to cover the operator’s losses. This procedure prevents a general blackout of the grid.”

    In Spain, the president of Red Eléctrica, Beatriz Corredor, whose experience in energy is more than scarce, has never given a message or coordinated actions to prevent blackouts that were happening more frequently recently. We have been experiencing sporadic supply cuts to the industry for years, and just a week ago, the Chamartín station had a severe supply cut episode.

    The crisis was not only a disaster due to the shortsighted energy policy of the current and previous governments. It was a disaster due to the inaction of the Ministry of Defence. Similar to the recent floods, our security forces exhibited astonishment at their lack of mobilization. Trains and elevators blocked thousands of travelers for hours, while the army stood by, waiting for orders.

    Six days ago, the government, left-wing parties, and many media outlets celebrated that Spain’s power grid ran entirely on renewable energy for a weekday for the first time. Bravo. A week later, a massive blackout in Spain, Portugal, and parts of France. France quickly restored electricity because it has the largest nuclear fleet in Europe. In Spain, the government maintained a confiscatory taxation system that prevented nuclear plants from operating, resulting in nearly eleven hours of darkness and no communication.

    Red Eléctrica reported that the cause was a “strong oscillation in the electrical grid” that “forced the Iberian Peninsula to disconnect from the European system”. The collapse was immediate and long-lasting. It was the longest power outage in the history of Spain. The recovery efforts were in vain as they attempted to restore frequency control and stability with a system dependent on volatile and intermittent renewables.

    A system without physical inertia, provided by baseload energies that operate all the time—nuclear and hydroelectric—makes it impossible to stabilise the grid in the face of supply disruptions.

    When the collapse occurred, the Spanish electrical grid had almost 80% renewable generation, 11% nuclear, and only 3% natural gas. There was practically no base generation or physical inertia to absorb the shock that was generated.

    For years, experts have issued warnings. Experts from around the world have been accused of being mouthpieces for invented lobbies when they warned of the risk to the system from overloading with renewables and eliminating or limiting base-load energies. In 2017, the European Network of Transmission System Operators warned that the increase in renewables would raise the risk of cascading failures if urgent investment was not made in synthetic inertia and storage technologies. Moreover, even if investment is made in storage, hundreds of experts warned about the additional burden with the electrification of the mobile fleet. Despite the warnings from energy companies and operators, the European Commission maintained its bet on renewable development that was poorly planned and worse executed. This included a New Green Deal that ignored the importance of networks and backup and seemed designed by school activists.

    The Spanish government wanted to present itself as the top student of that so-called ecological sectarianism, which ignores copper and lithium mining, the importance of backup, and system stability. What have they achieved? They have created a disaster that has the potential to repeat itself.

    Blackouts, which should have been something obsolete and forgotten, have become the norm since politicians have ideologised energy. Other countries have suffered similar problems: Australia (2016), Germany (2017), and the United Kingdom (2019) experienced blackouts or near-blackouts due to insufficient energy reserves or grid stability measures. However, none of these incidents have been as dramatic or scandalous as the one in Spain.

    The governments of Spain have decided that the closure of all our nuclear power plants will be effective in 2035, despite all the technicians reminding us that they work perfectly and their lifespan could be extended by at least ten years. This action is going to increase dependence on renewables and Russian natural gas. In other words, Spain’s shortsighted policy is going to make the country more dependent on China and Russia for energy and face constant blackouts and supply cuts to the industry as if it were a third-world dictatorship.

    Propaganda told us that renewables would bring competitiveness and stability to the grid, but the reality shows that an over-reliance on certain renewables and a shortage of base-load energy sources indicate that the electrical grid increasingly depends on the few nuclear and natural gas plants that operate to maintain supply stability.

    The blackout in Spain was not caused by a cyberattack but by the worst possible attack, that of politicians against their citizens.

    It is urgent that Spain radically changes its energy strategy, that we maintain and expand the nuclear and base energy park, or we will depend more on Russia and China and, moreover, with blackouts.

    Tyler Durden Wed, 04/30/2025 - 11:45
  29. Site: Catholic Herald
    4 days 13 hours ago
    Author: The Catholic Herald

    As news of Pope Francis’s death broke, increasing numbers of world leaders from across the political and religious spectrums joined in paying tribute to his life and work.

    “How appropriate that Pope Francis’s last public appearance was on Easter Sunday as we celebrated the joy of the resurrection of Jesus, whom he loved so deeply and so well, and right after our Jewish brothers and sisters, for whom Pope Francis had such great love, concluded their celebration of Passover. I was honoured to participate in the conclave that elected Pope Francis in 2013, and to have welcomed him here to New York in 2015. He touched us all with his simplicity, with his heart of a humble servant.” Cardinal Timothy Dolan, Archbishop of New York

    “Pope Francis was a transcendent voice for peace, human dignity and social justice. He leaves behind a legacy of faith, service and compassion for all – especially those left on the margins of life or trapped by the horrors of conflict. He also understood that protecting our common home is, at heart, a deeply moral mission and responsibility that belongs to every person.” António Guterres, UN Secretary-General

    “Pope Francis dedicated himself to the service of others – revealing by his own actions how to live a simple, but meaningful life. The best tribute we can pay to him is to be a warm-hearted person, serving others wherever and in whatever way we can.” The Dalai Lama

    “Pope Francis will be remembered as one of the most consequential leaders of our time and I am better for having known him. He made all feel welcome and seen by the Church. He promoted equity and an end to poverty and suffering across the globe. Above all, he was a Pope for everyone. He was the People’s Pope – a light of faith, hope and love.” Former US President Joe Biden

    “Pope Francis was the rare leader who made us want to be better people. In his humility and his gestures, at once simple and profound – embracing the sick, ministering to the homeless, washing the feet of young prisoners – he shook us out of our complacency and reminded us that we are all bound by moral obligations to God and one another.” Former US President Barack Obama

    “Pope Francis’s legacy is his message of peace, reconciliation and solidarity that lives in the hearts of those he inspired. May he rest in peace, and may his memory continue to guide us as we strive to build a world that reflects his vision of love and compassion for all.” Micheál Martin, Irish Taoiseach

    “Pope Francis will be remembered foremost as the ‘Pope of the peripheries’, determined to lead the Church in reaching out to those on the margins – the poor, elderly, disabled, unborn, refugees and prisoners. He demonstrated this in the way he carried out the Petrine ministry, using his global profile to give voice to those too often forgotten.” Anthony Fisher OP, Archbishop of Sydney

    “Despite differences that are minor today, to have been able to know him in his goodness and wisdom was a real honour for me.” Javier Milei, President of Argentina

    “Pope Francis played a distinguished role in advocating for peace and coexistence, and stood in solidarity with the oppressed and persecuted across the globe. The Supreme Religious Authority offers its condolences to followers of the Catholic Church and prays for patience and solace for them, and that God may bless humanity with goodness, mercy and peace.” Grand Ayatollah Sistani

    “Through his teachings and actions, Pope Francis redefined the moral responsibilities of leadership in the 21st century. His Holiness understood, and taught, that value in the market must never eclipse values in society. Pope Francis leaves a spiritual and ethical legacy that will shape our collective conscience for generations to come.” Mark Carney, Prime Minister of Canada

    “As we mourn Pope Francis’s death, we give thanks for his life and legacy of reform, renewal, unity, which opened doors of dialogue and brought the Church closer to people from all walks of life.” Dr Anne Burghardt, General Secretary of the World Lutheran Federation

    “Throughout his pontificate Pope Francis always sided with the most vulnerable and the most fragile, and he did this with a lot of humility. In this time of war and brutality, he had a sense for the other, for the most fragile.” Emmanuel Macron, President of France

    “We mourn the passing of His Holiness Pope Francis – a shepherd who led with courage and unwavering faith. Twice, we had the honour of welcoming him to Hungary. His prayer to the Blessed Virgin Mary, Our Lady of Hungary, still resonates: ‘Instil into the hearts of people and the leaders of nations the desire to build peace.’ We will honour his legacy.” Viktor Orbán, President of Hungary

    The Ecumenical Patriarch:

    “In the atmosphere of great Easter joy came the sad news of the death of Pope Francis, a precious brother in Christ, with whom from the first moment of his ascension to the papal throne, we had a fraternal friendship and cooperation for the good of our Churches, for the further rapprochement of our Churches, for the good of humanity.

    “Throughout these twelve years of his papacy, he stood as a faithful friend, companion and supporter of the Ecumenical Patriarchate, a genuine friend of Orthodoxy, a genuine friend of the least of the Lord’s brothers, for whom he often spoke, acted and touched their feet, in an example of genuine humility and brotherly love. We will always remember him.

    “We pray that the Lord of life and death will reward him for his many labours for the Church and for man, and will raise up on the Throne of Saint Peter a worthy successor, who will embrace the visions of Pope Francis and continue his valuable work for all humanity, especially for Christianity, and even more specifically for the rapprochement of our sister Churches with the ultimate goal of their complete encounter in the common Chalice. Eternal memory to you, brother Pope Francis.”

    The Archbishop of York:

    “Christians of all denominations join in mourning the death of Pope Francis, but also sharing in the deep consolation that he has entered into the joy of the Lord in this Easter season. Having delivered a final apostolic blessing in St Peter’s Square on the Day of the Resurrection, this faithful servant of the Lord was called home to his Father’s house.

    “Together with my fellow Anglicans, I share in the intense sorrow at the death of this good and holy man, who brought our churches ever closer together. Anglican and Catholic primates officiated together in Rome; Anglican and Catholic bishops were commissioned to minister alongside each other across the world; Choral Evensong was sung for the first time in St Peter’s Basilica. Under his pontificate even cricket became a channel for ecumenism, with regular tours of the Vatican XI to England, which Pope Francis rightly saw as an opportunity to build bridges of fraternal solidarity and to promote Christian unity.

    “I pray for the soul of a faithful and holy Christian, one who bore the demands of his office with courage and determination, and who showed us in his ministry and mission, his living and his dying how to be a disciple of Jesus Christ.”

    Photo: Various world leaders and dignitaries attend the funeral of Pope Francis in St. Peter’s Square in the Vatican, 26 April 2025. (Photo by Franco Origlia/Getty Images.)

    Editorial note: the papacy and the See of Canterbury are simultaneously vacant for the first time since 1691, after the deposition of William Sancroft and the death of Alexander VIII.

    This article appears in the May 2025 edition of the Catholic Herald. To subscribe to our thought-provoking magazine and have independent, high-calibre and counter-cultural Catholic journalism delivered to your door anywhere in the world click HERE.

    Loading

    The post In their own words: global political and religious leaders pay tribute to life and work of Pope Francis first appeared on Catholic Herald.

    The post In their own words: global political and religious leaders pay tribute to life and work of Pope Francis appeared first on Catholic Herald.

  30. Site: LifeNews
    4 days 13 hours ago
    Author: Liberty Counsel

    A groundbreaking report released yesterday reveals the chemical abortion drug Mifepristone is 22 times more dangerous than the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) claims on its drug label. The Ethics and Public Policy Center (EPPC) conducted and published the study finding that one in 10 women experience a serious adverse health event within 45 days after taking Mifepristone for an abortion.

    “Simply stated, Mifepristone, as used in real-world conditions, is not ‘safe and effective,’” wrote the researchers, which consisted of a team of scientists, board-certified obstetricians and gynecologists, analysts, and engineers.

    Get the latest pro-life news and information on X (Twitter). //

    Described as the “largest-known study of the abortion pill,” the EPPC analyzed 865,727 Mifepristone abortions under “real-world conditions” from 2017 to 2023 using an “all-payer insurance claims database.” In contrast, the report notes, the FDA relies on decade-old data from 10 clinical trials that involved just 30,966 “pre-screened” and “generally healthy” women. Under that small data set, which found less than 0.5 percent of women suffered serious adverse reactions, the FDA lets Danco Laboratories market Mifepristone, under the label “Mifeprex,” as “safe and effective.” However, the EPPC examined data that is more “broadly representative” of the women actually having Mifepristone abortions in America rather than just relying on data from the “carefully controlled regimen of care” of a clinical trial. These women would have had varying degrees of real-world “pre- and post-abortion health care,” if any care at all.

    “The real-world rate of serious adverse events following Mifepristone abortions is at least 22 times as high as the summary figure of ‘less than 0.5 percent’ in clinical trials reported on the drug label,” read the report. “10.93 percent of women experience sepsis, infection, hemorrhaging, or another serious or life-threatening adverse event within 45 days following a Mifepristone abortion.”

    The specific rates of serious complications consisted of:

    • abortion-related emergency room visit (4.73 percent)
    • hemorrhage (3.31 percent)
    • infection (1.34 percent)
    • ectopic pregnancy (0.35 percent)
    • abortion-related hospitalization (0.66 percent)
    • transfusion (0.15 percent)
    • sepsis (0.10 percent)
    • unspecified other abortion-specific complications (5.68 percent),
    • other life-threatening adverse events (0.22 percent), including cardiac and pulmonary events, thrombosis, anaphylaxis, and the necessity of surgery.

    Notably, nearly three percent of the adverse events required a follow-on surgical abortion due the abortion drug failing.

    As the report states, the FDA initially approved Mifepristone in 2000 under a “little-used approval process” for new drugs treating serious or life-threatening illnesses. Under this process, FDA considered an unwanted pregnancy a “serious or life-threatening illness” and concluded Mifepristone was more effective than surgical abortion. Then, under the Obama and Biden administrations, the drug’s safeguards were heavily deregulated between 2016 to 2021 where it can now be used through the 10th week of pregnancy, can be prescribed by health care providers who are not physicians, can be prescribed online through telehealth appointments, can be sent through the mail, and adverse events are no longer required to be reported.

    Due to the report’s findings, the EPPC recommended the FDA reinstate all of the abortion pill’s original safety protocols. Specifically, the researchers recommended:

    • Mifepristone should be prescribed only by physicians.
    • A Mifepristone prescription should include three in-person physician visits.
    • Mifepristone should be administered only in a clinic, medical office, or hospital, by or under the supervision of a physician.
    • Physicians must be able to provide surgical intervention in cases of incomplete abortion or severe bleeding, or have made plans to provide such care through others.
    • Health care providers should be required once again to report to the FDA (and manufacturers of Mifepristone) all serious adverse events resulting from the use of the drug.
    • Mifepristone should only be prescribed to a woman who is confirmed by a physician to be in the first seven weeks of pregnancy, as originally required by the FDA.

    Liberty Counsel Action Chairman Mat Staver said, “This study from the Ethics and Public Policy Center shows that abortion is never safe for women and it certainly is not ‘health care.’ Chemical abortions harm women physically and emotionally and cruelly kill defenseless children in the womb. There is a deliberate strategy to misinform people about chemical abortion and the science clearly proves that it is unsafe and devastatingly harmful to women.”

    The post How Can the Abortion Pill be Health Care When it Kills Babies and Hurts Women? appeared first on LifeNews.com.

  31. Site: AsiaNews.it
    4 days 13 hours ago
    The 65-year-old bishop of Kalookan is one of three Filipino cardinals in the conclave. As a priest, bishop, and then cardinal he always showed a missionary attention for the downtrodden. He was the strongest voice against former President Duterte's "war on drugs" and promoted rehabilitation programmes for drug addicts. He warns against looking at the conclave as a horse race, highlighting the sacredness of the election of a pontiff.
  32. Site: Zero Hedge
    4 days 13 hours ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    The Gold Rush You Weren't Supposed To Notice & The Next Big Monetary Reset

    Authored by Nick Giambruno via InternationalMan.com,

    Last year, central banks purchased approximately 34 million ounces of gold, marking the third consecutive year of near-record buying.

    We’re witnessing the acceleration of a long-term trend that began around the 2008 financial crisis, when central banks shifted from net sellers to net buyers of gold. That trend has exploded in recent years, with gold purchases surging to record-breaking levels, as shown in the chart below.

    All signs indicate that 2025 will be another massive year for central bank gold buying.

    Central banks and governments are the largest single holders of gold in the world. Together, they officially own over 1.2 billion troy ounces—out of the 6.9 billion ounces humans have mined throughout history.

    However, these are just the official numbers that governments report. The actual gold holdings could be much higher, as governments tend to be secretive about their reserves, treating gold as a strategic financial asset.

    Russia and China—the US’s top geopolitical rivals—have been the biggest gold buyers over the last two decades.

    It’s no secret that China has been stashing away as much gold as possible for many years.

    China is the world’s largest producer and buyer of gold. Russia is number two. Most of that gold enters the Chinese and Russian government’s vaults.

    The trend of central bank gold accumulation is gaining momentum. If the rest of the world is moving back toward gold, the US will not want to be left behind.

    Yet, officially, the US has not added a single ounce to its 261 million ounces of gold reserves in decades.

    Unofficially? That may be a different story.

    Since Trump’s victory in the 2024 presidential election last November, a sudden flood of physical gold has flowed into the US from major gold hubs like London, Switzerland, and elsewhere.

    The gold market is typically dominated by paper trading, with large-scale physical deliveries being rare. However, CNBC and the World Gold Council report that more than 19 million ounces—possibly much more—of physical gold has entered the US since November.

    That’s roughly 13% of the total alleged gold holdings in Fort Knox flowing into the US in less than six months.

    This is not normal market action.

    This strongly suggests that a non-market entity—most likely the US government—is behind this massive gold movement.

    That’s why Trump’s recent comments about Fort Knox are so interesting.

    Trump recently brought Fort Knox into the national conversation, something no US president has done in decades.

    Would he have even mentioned the possibility of auditing Fort Knox if the vaults were empty? I doubt it.

    Instead, there’s a good chance that the enormous inflow of physical gold into the US is happening in anticipation of an audit.

    Connecting the Dots—Something Big Is Coming

    So, here’s what we know:

    1. Trump has put Fort Knox’s gold holdings back in the national spotlight for the first time in decades.

    2. Central bank gold purchases are accelerating at record-breaking levels.

    3. An unusually large influx of physical gold is flowing into the US, far beyond regular market activity.

    Follow the Gold. It Always Leads to the Truth

    Central banks are hoarding gold at record levels. The US government is likely pulling in millions of ounces. And Trump is talking about Fort Knox.

    This isn’t coincidence.

    Find out what they’re preparing for and how you can be ready in our urgent dispatch:

    The Most Dangerous Economic Crisis in 100 Years… the Top 3 Strategies You Need Right Now

    Click here see it now.

    Tyler Durden Wed, 04/30/2025 - 11:05
  33. Site: LifeNews
    4 days 13 hours ago
    Author: Shawn Carney

    An East Coast Planned Parenthood employee felt empty as she realized that her work was NOT helping women.

    But the ex-abortion worker didn’t know where to turn until the witness of 40 Days for Life participants led her to a pregnancy help center, where she found support transitioning to a new career–and became a Christian!

    On last night’s Built to Win video webcast, we shared that four abortion workers repented and left their jobs…and the numbers keep rolling in:

    • Since the webcast, we have confirmed that two MORE abortion workers encountered God’s grace and left their jobs during this spring’s campaign;
    • At least ten additional abortion workers (who might or might not have converted) walked away from the industry for a total of 16 workers who hit the exits!
    • 25,638 babies have been saved from abortion–that we know of–since 40 Days for Life began in 2007!
    • Notorious abortion facilities CLOSED in New York City, Illinois, Michigan, Vermont, and Colorado!

    REACH PRO-LIFE PEOPLE WORLDWIDE! Advertise with LifeNews to reach hundreds of thousands of pro-life readers every week. Contact us today.

    Get the stories behind these historic results by watching the webcast:

    LifeNews.com Note: Shawn Carney is the campaign director for the 40 Days for Life pro-life prayer campaign against abortion. File photo.

    The post Planned Parenthood Employee Quits and Becomes a Christian appeared first on LifeNews.com.

  34. Site: LES FEMMES - THE TRUTH
    4 days 13 hours ago
    Author: noreply@blogger.com (Mary Ann Kreitzer)
  35. Site: Voice of the Family
    4 days 13 hours ago
    Author: Peter Newman

    On Easter Friday, the Catholic faithful gathered outside Parliament for a public recitation of the Rosary, in response to Voice of the Family’s appeal. The event marked the midpoint of a 54-day Rosary crusade against euthanasia, which threatens to be legalised by the UK Parliament by the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill. A […]

    The post Public support for euthanasia: a matter of eternal life and death appeared first on Voice of the Family.

  36. Site: Voice of the Family
    4 days 13 hours ago
    Author: Peter Newman

    From the introduction of Thorold’s 1906 translation of The Dialogues of St Catherine of Siena. Midway between sky and earth hangs a City Beautiful: Siena, Vetus Civitas Virginis. The town seems to have descended as a bride from airy regions, and lightly settled on the summits of three hills which it crowns with domes and […]

    The post The perfect manner and irresistible attractiveness of St Catherine of Siena appeared first on Voice of the Family.

  37. Site: Voice of the Family
    4 days 13 hours ago
    Author: Peter Newman

    “Wisdom rendered to the just the wages of their labours, and conducted them in a wonderful way; and she was to them for a covert by day, and for the light of stars by night.” These words form part of the introit of the Mass of this feast. They come from the Book of Wisdom, […]

    The post Worth his wages: sermon on the feast of St Joseph the Worker appeared first on Voice of the Family.

  38. Site: southern orders
    4 days 13 hours ago

    April 30, 2025 at 8:48am

    Front-runner Parolin's audition is a flop 

    Cardinal Pietro Parolin, former Vatican secretary of state, reads his homily while celebrating Mass on the second day of the second day of the "novendiali" -- nine days of mourning for Pope Francis marked by Masses -- in St. Peter's Square April 27, 2025. (CNS photo/Pablo Esparza)

    Cardinal Pietro Parolin had an audition of sorts for pope on Sunday and the reviews are in and hey aren't good. Parolin, seen as a front-runner for the seat of St. Peter, said Mass for 200,000 young people in St. Peter's Square. He praised Pope Francis, but his stilted style left him unable to connect with a crowd. As one cardinal-elector told the National Catholic Reporter, the Mass was a reminder of Francis' charisma and communication gifts and that Parolin lacks both. 

    BUT THEN, THE NCR FREAKS OUT OVER INSULTS HURLED AT THEIR PREFERRED CANDIDATE, CARDINAL TAGLE! THIS COMMENTARY IS OVER THE TOP AND SHOWS THE FEAR OF THE NCR AT THIS JUNCTURE IN PAPAL HISTORY:

    Push title:

  39. Site: southern orders
    4 days 13 hours ago

    April 30, 2025 at 8:48am

    Front-runner Parolin's audition is a flop 

    Cardinal Pietro Parolin, former Vatican secretary of state, reads his homily while celebrating Mass on the second day of the second day of the "novendiali" -- nine days of mourning for Pope Francis marked by Masses -- in St. Peter's Square April 27, 2025. (CNS photo/Pablo Esparza)

    Cardinal Pietro Parolin had an audition of sorts for pope on Sunday and the reviews are in and hey aren't good. Parolin, seen as a front-runner for the seat of St. Peter, said Mass for 200,000 young people in St. Peter's Square. He praised Pope Francis, but his stilted style left him unable to connect with a crowd. As one cardinal-elector told the National Catholic Reporter, the Mass was a reminder of Francis' charisma and communication gifts and that Parolin lacks both. 

    BUT THEN, THE NCR FREAKS OUT OVER INSULTS HURLED AT THEIR PREFERRED CANDIDATE, CARDINAL TAGLE! THIS COMMENTARY IS OVER THE TOP AND SHOWS THE FEAR OF THE NCR AT THIS JUNCTURE IN PAPAL HISTORY:

    Push title:

  40. Site: LifeNews
    4 days 14 hours ago
    Author: Grace Porto

    Now that the Trump administration has shut down the Biden-era “reproductiverights.org,” Congress should go a step further and create a federal website compiling life-affirming resources for women in need, a recent op-ed argued.

    Maggie McKneely wrote in an article for the Concerned Women for America Legislative Action Committee (CWALAC), “For every one Planned Parenthood clinic, there are dozens of pregnancy resource centers and clinics ready to help new moms. But while these life-affirming centers outnumber the big abortion facilities, their advertising budgets are infinitesimally smaller.”

    McKneely pointed out that recent studies show that 87% of women who get abortions are not married, indicating that they are without a strong support system.

    These women, she continued, are targeted by the abortion industry, which the Biden administration further encouraged with their federal abortion website. McKneely expressed gratitude that President Donald Trump had this website taken down but added that Congress needed to take a further step.

    “In post-Roe America, it is critical for the pro-life movement to help these women know that they have other options besides abortion, and there is a community of compassionate caregivers willing to walk beside them in a difficult season,” she wrote. “Rather than help the abortion industry further advertise its services, the administration can use its resources to promote resources that actually help women.”

    REACH PRO-LIFE PEOPLE WORLDWIDE! Advertise with LifeNews to reach hundreds of thousands of pro-life readers every week. Contact us today.

    The proposed federal website would ask for a woman’s zip code and provide information for various local resources, including pregnancy crisis centers, housing support, legal support, services in the case of domestic violence, and mentorship opportunities. The website, McKneely continued, would link various government resources related to these services.

    “This web portal would show that an expectant mom does not have to turn to Planned Parenthood as her only option,” she wrote. “It would not force her to choose life or regulate abortion in any way from the federal level. What it would do is provide easier access to the vast network of providers willing to walk with a mom as she navigates her pregnancy and early years of motherhood.”

    McKneely states that Florida, South Dakota, and North Dakota have all created similar websites on a state level, offering a model for a federal website.

    Moreover, there are two upcoming bills in Congress that would support the creation of a pro-life resource website: Standing with Moms, which will be sponsored by Sen. Eric Schmitt, R-Mo., and the MOMS Act, sponsored by Sen. Katie Britt, R-Ala.

    LifeNews Note: Grace Porto writes for CatholicVote, where this column originally appeared.

    The post After Shutting Down Biden’s Pro-Abortion Web Site, Trump Should Launch Pro-Life Version appeared first on LifeNews.com.

  41. Site: Zero Hedge
    4 days 14 hours ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    Stagflation Scenario Slammed As Fed's Favorite Inflation Indicator Tumbles To Four Year Lows

    The Fed's favorite inflation indicator - Core PCE - printed cooler than expected in March, unchanged MoM (vs +0.1% exp), bring prices up 2.6% YoY - the lowest since March 2021...

    Source: Bloomberg

    ...with non-durable goods deflating MoM the biggest drag on Core PCE

    ...but, but, but we were told tariffs would spark hyper-super-scary-inflation?

    The headline PCE was -0.045% MoM - the biggest MoM drop since COVID lockdowns...

    ...dragging headline PCE YoY down to +2.3%...

    SuperCore PCE also saw the YoY pace slow significantly...

    Spending outpaced incomes significantly in March...

    Source: Bloomberg

    Which means that the savings rate fell to 3.9% from 4.1% in February, which was revised lower from 4.6%...

    Adjusted for inflation, real personal spending surged 0.7% MoM (not a total surprise given that 'consumers' are panicking over an imminent surge in inflation, of course they should be spending)....

    It appears DOGE is doing its jobs too - crushing govt wage growth

    • March Government worker wages and salaries up just 2.9%, down from 3.2% in Feb and the lowest since Sept 2020

    • March Private worker wages and salaries up 5.4%, down from 5.7%, and lowest since Dec 2022

    ...and there goes the stagflation scenario.

    Tyler Durden Wed, 04/30/2025 - 10:16
  42. Site: Ron Paul Institute - Featured Articles
    4 days 14 hours ago
    Author: James Bovard

    Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent complained last week that the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund are suffering from “mission creep.” But Bessent announced that Trump will be “doubling down” on supporting the largest foreign aid gushers on earth. “Far from stepping back, ‘America First’ seeks to expand U.S. leadership in international institutions like the I.M.F. and World Bank,” Bessent declared. 

    Bessent complained that the IMF “devotes disproportionate time and resources to work on climate change, gender, and social issues.” Unfortunately, Bessent said nothing about how the IMF and World Bank bankrolled many of the worst crony Covid crackdown policies.

    But what should the US government expect when Congress and endless presidents give the World Bank and IMF billions of US tax dollars to play with? The US government is on the hook for $52 billion to the World Bank. The US has a financial commitment of $183 billion to the IMF. 

    The IMF was created in 1944 to shore up currencies and help nations with temporary balance-of-payment problems. In the decades since the IMF’s founding, global capital markets and fluctuating currency exchange rates have made the IMF a relic. But too many people have gotten rich from IMF largesse to permit the curtain to be closed on this institution.

    The IMF enabled scores of governments that chose to pointlessly shut down their own economies after the outbreak of Covid-19. IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva declared in April 2021, “While the recovery [from Covid] is underway, too many countries are falling behind and economic inequality is worsening. Strong policy action is needed to give everyone a fair shot—a shot in the arm to end the pandemic everywhere, and a shot at a better future for vulnerable people and countries.”

    The IMF’s “fair shot” consisted of its international bureaucrats providing scores of billions of dollars in “emergency financing” to 80 governments, most of whom exploited Covid to stretch their own power. The IMF provided emergency relief via the Catastrophe Containment and Relief Trust (CCRT) to 29 governments to supposedly help them “combat the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.” The IMF’s deluge of handouts to government helped fuel the worldwide inflation surge in recent years. 

    The World Bank President Ajay Banga “has sought to emphasize the bank’s focus on job creationand to prioritize private sector involvement in projects around the world,” the New York Times reported. But the World Bank’s notion of the private sector has often been either a fraud or a political smokescreen. In the late 1980s, the World Bank touted its loans to Communist nations as private sector-oriented loans – one bait-and-switch too many, as I detailed in a 1988 Wall Street Journal article. And permitting the Bank to exonerate its handouts by counting illusory jobs created is a recipe for make-work scams. 

    The Covid pandemic provided the World Bank with the chance to play savior. In the first months of the pandemic, the Bank proudly announced that its “emergency operations to fight COVID-19 (coronavirus) have reached 100 developing countries – home to 70% of the world’s population.” From April 2020 to March 2021, the World Bank “committed over $200 billion, an unprecedented level of financial support, to public and private sector clients to fight the impacts of the pandemic.  Our support is tailored to the health, economic, and social shocks that countries are facing.” The fact that the World Bank was effectively financing governments to pointlessly shock their own nations was omitted from celebratory press releases.

    The IMF and World Bank have helped turn many foreign nations into kleptocracies – governments of thieves. A 2002 American Economic Review analysis concluded that “increases in [foreign] aid are associated with contemporaneous increases in corruption,” and that “corruption is positively correlated with aid received from the United States.”

    Most importantly, neither the IMF nor the World Bank has any qualms about bankrolling tyranny. A 2015 report of the United Nations’ Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights, Philip Alston, concluded that the World Bank “now stands almost alone, along with the International Monetary Fund, in insisting that human rights are matters of politics which it must, as a matter of legal principle, avoid, rather than being an integral part of the international legal order.”

    The Bank justifies this position by insisting that it cannot involve “itself in the partisan politics or ideological disputes that affect its member countries” by improper methods such as “favoring political factions, parties or candidates in elections,” or “endorsing or mandating a particular form of government, political bloc or political ideology.”

    But any time an international organization financially bails out a regime, it bolsters its power. After the United States invaded Afghanistan and Iraq, the Pentagon coined a term that perfectly captures the effect of foreign aid: “Money as a Weapon System.” The 2015 UN report noted that “the existing approach taken by the World Bank to human rights is incoherent, counterproductive and unsustainable. For most purposes, the World Bank is a human rights-free zone. In its operational policies, in particular, it treats human rights more like an infectious disease than universal values and obligations.”

    The World Bank actively blindfolds itself to avoid hearing about atrocities in nations ruled by governments that it is bankrolling. The Special Rapporteur noted, “By refusing to take account of any information emanating from human rights sources, the Bank places itself in an artificial bubble.” 

    The Trump administration’s lust for “doubling down” on the IMF and World Bank is dicey to reconcile with their terminating 90% of foreign aid contracts from the US Agency for International Development (USAID). Cynics across the land rejoiced that Washington policymakers finally recognized one of the biggest swindles of the past 80 years. 

    If the Trump team can’t even get sound policy on the World Bank, then what hope is there of them resolving any more complex challenges? I was briefly a consultant for the World Bank in the late 1980s, getting paid to co-author a report on the follies of farm subsidies. At that point, Reagan administration officials had periodically caterwauled about the Bank for almost a decade, and they were followed by sporadic howling by the US Treasury Department ever since. Secretary Bessent complained on Wednesday that the World Bank “should no longer expect blank checks for vapid, buzzword-centric marketing accompanied by halfhearted commitments to reform.” But after almost a half-century of failed US attempts to reform the Bank and IMF, there is no reason to expect any boondoggles to be left behind.  

    Or do Trump’s appointees believe that laundering U.S. tax dollars through international entities somehow makes them beneficent? Or maybe US Treasury Department honchos want to make sure they continue to get invited to the most lavish parties in D.C. and around the world. Regardless, the IMF and World Bank financing the worst Covid policies around the globe is another reminder of why those entities should be axed.

    Reprinted with permission from the Brownstone Institute.

  43. Site: Steyn Online
    4 days 14 hours ago
    Mark takes questions from Steyn Club members around the planet...
  44. Site: Steyn Online
    4 days 14 hours ago
    If you missed today's edition of Steyn's Clubland Q&A live around the planet, here's the action replay...
  45. Site: Rorate Caeli
    4 days 14 hours ago
     Roberto de MatteiCorrispondenza RomanaApril 30, 2025The funeral of Pope Francis on the parvis of St. Peter's Basilica and the translation of the coffin to St. Mary Major, in the grandiose setting of ancient, Baroque, and 19th-century Rome, represented a historic moment charged with symbolism. Sovereigns, heads of state and government, public men of all ranks, gathered from all over the New Catholichttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04118576661605931910noreply@blogger.com
  46. Site: Zero Hedge
    4 days 15 hours ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    Judge Bars Border Patrol From Making Warrantless Arrests Of Illegal Immigrants In Parts Of California

    Authored by Tom Ozimek via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

    A federal judge in California has barred U.S. Border Patrol agents from arresting suspected illegal immigrants within parts of the state without a warrant or specific evidence that the individual poses a flight risk—while delivering a rebuke to tactics used during a controversial January enforcement sweep.

    Border Patrol agents wait for the arrival of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth for a visit to the US-Mexico border in Sunland Park, New Mexico, on Feb. 3, 2025. AP Photo/Andres Leighton, File

    In an April 29 order, U.S. District Judge Jennifer L. Thurston issued a preliminary injunction against the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Border Patrol, siding with the United Farm Workers and five Kern County residents who sued after the raid, dubbed “Operation Return to Sender,” unfolded across the Bakersfield area earlier this year.

    The plaintiffs, represented by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), alleged in their Feb. 26 complaint that the sweep violated their Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights, along with federal immigration statutes governing warrantless arrests and due process.

    Under Thurston’s order, Border Patrol agents operating in California’s Eastern District are now prohibited from making detentions or arrests without first establishing reasonable suspicion of unlawful presence in the country and, for arrests, probable cause that the individual is likely to flee before a warrant can be obtained.

    “The evidence before the Court is that Border Patrol agents under DHS authority engaged in conduct that violated well-established constitutional rights,” Thurston wrote in the ruling.

    The court also restricted the agency’s use of “voluntary departure,” a process by which illegal immigrants agree to leave the United States without a hearing before an immigration judge. Going forward, agents must clearly inform individuals of their rights and obtain genuine, informed consent before initiating such removals.

    The judge further ordered DHS to submit regular reports documenting any warrantless stops or arrests, along with justifications, for the duration of litigation. She also instructed DHS to issue written guidelines clarifying the legal threshold for initiating stops.

    “This guidance shall include, among other things, that refusal to answer questions does not, without more, constitute a basis for reasonable suspicion to justify a detentive stop,” she wrote.

    The case stems from allegations that, beginning in early January 2025, dozens of Border Patrol agents traveled more than 300 miles inland from the U.S.–Mexico border to Bakersfield, targeting predominantly Latino neighborhoods and day laborer gathering spots without individualized suspicion.

    The plaintiffs described “Operation Return to Sender” as a sweeping dragnet based on racial and occupational profiling, claiming agents pulled over vehicles, blocked parked cars, conducted warrantless searches, and detained people without evidence of unlawful presence.

    Once in custody, detainees were allegedly transported to a facility near the border, denied access to attorneys, and pressured into signing “voluntary departure” forms without understanding the consequences—a process plaintiffs described as “summary expulsion” that can carry long-term reentry bans.

    Once in custody, detainees claimed they were transported to a Border Patrol facility near the border, where they were denied access to lawyers and coerced into signing “voluntary departure” forms under misleading pretenses, which they described as a “form of summary expulsion.”

    Attorneys for the Justice Department argued the case should be dismissed, claiming the plaintiffs lacked standing and that no official policy mandated unlawful stops or arrests. They further contended that any potential violations were isolated incidents, not part of a broader pattern, and that the lawsuit had become moot after DHS issued revised internal guidance.

    But the court rejected those arguments, finding that the plaintiffs demonstrated a credible threat of repeated harm. Thurston wrote that the new DHS policy did not eliminate the risk of future violations and “could be withdrawn or altered in the future” without constraint.

    The Epoch Times contacted the Justice Department and the ACLU with requests for comment on the ruling.

    Tyler Durden Wed, 04/30/2025 - 09:40
  47. Site: southern orders
    4 days 15 hours ago

     This is very hopeful to read from Vatican News. The part I highlight in red is extremely important in reverence to the former Pope Francis and his governing style. 

    Cardinals discuss economic situation of the Holy See at General Congregation

    By Vatican News

    The Director of the Holy See Press Office, Matteo Bruni, told reporters on Wednesday that 180 Cardinals attended the seventh General Congregation, of whom 124 were Cardinal electors.

    In the first part of the meeting, the Cardinals discussed the economic and financial situation of the Holy See, with contributions from Cardinals Reinhard Marx, Kevin Farrell, Christoph Schönborn, Fernando Vergez, and Konrad Krajewski.

    Cardinal Marx, coordinator of the Council for the Economy, presented several challenges, issues, and proposals from the perspective of sustainability, with the goal that the economic structures continue to support the reforms of the papacy.

    Cardinal Schönborn spoke as president of the IOR Oversight Commission, and Cardinal Vergez shared several details regarding the situation of the Governorate of Vatican City State, mentioning the ongoing renovation work.

    Cardinal Krajewski spoke about the activities of the Dicastery for the Service of Charity.

    In the second part of the General Congregation, 14 Cardinals intervened on various topics, including the ecclesiology of the people of God and the wound caused by polarization within the Church and the division in society, (division caused by) synodality and (and division synodality has brought to) episcopal collegiality (all this was discussed) as a way (to find solutions) to overcome polarization. (They also discussed) vocations to the priesthood and religious life.

    Several references were made to the conciliar texts Lumen Gentium and Gaudium et Spes, and they discussed evangelization, especially focusing on the consistency between what is lived and what is proclaimed. (My comment: these two Vatican II documents are wonderful and do provide a correction to the Magisterium of the Former Pope Francis!)

    The General Congregation concluded at 12:30 PM with the prayer of the Regina Coeli.

  48. Site: southern orders
    4 days 15 hours ago

     This is very hopeful to read from Vatican News. The part I highlight in red is extremely important in reverence to the former Pope Francis and his governing style. 

    Cardinals discuss economic situation of the Holy See at General Congregation

    By Vatican News

    The Director of the Holy See Press Office, Matteo Bruni, told reporters on Wednesday that 180 Cardinals attended the seventh General Congregation, of whom 124 were Cardinal electors.

    In the first part of the meeting, the Cardinals discussed the economic and financial situation of the Holy See, with contributions from Cardinals Reinhard Marx, Kevin Farrell, Christoph Schönborn, Fernando Vergez, and Konrad Krajewski.

    Cardinal Marx, coordinator of the Council for the Economy, presented several challenges, issues, and proposals from the perspective of sustainability, with the goal that the economic structures continue to support the reforms of the papacy.

    Cardinal Schönborn spoke as president of the IOR Oversight Commission, and Cardinal Vergez shared several details regarding the situation of the Governorate of Vatican City State, mentioning the ongoing renovation work.

    Cardinal Krajewski spoke about the activities of the Dicastery for the Service of Charity.

    In the second part of the General Congregation, 14 Cardinals intervened on various topics, including the ecclesiology of the people of God and the wound caused by polarization within the Church and the division in society, (division caused by) synodality and (and division synodality has brought to) episcopal collegiality (all this was discussed) as a way (to find solutions) to overcome polarization. (They also discussed) vocations to the priesthood and religious life.

    Several references were made to the conciliar texts Lumen Gentium and Gaudium et Spes, and they discussed evangelization, especially focusing on the consistency between what is lived and what is proclaimed. (My comment: these two Vatican II documents are wonderful and do provide a correction to the Magisterium of the Former Pope Francis!)

    The General Congregation concluded at 12:30 PM with the prayer of the Regina Coeli.

  49. Site: LifeNews
    4 days 15 hours ago
    Author: Elise DeGeeter

    CatholicVote joined a coalition of over 30 pro-life organizations Tuesday in urging the Trump administration to evaluate the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) approval of the abortion drug mifepristone, immediately following the release of a new study revealing serious health risks.

    In a letter to President Donald Trump, the coalition praised Trump’s pro-life leadership and called for swift action to protect unborn children and their mothers. The letter argues that mifepristone—used in over 60% of US abortions—was irresponsibly approved in 2000 and continues to harm women.

    “We respectfully ask that you take swift action to protect the rights of states to defend unborn children, in keeping with your campaign pledge to return the issue of abortion to the states,” the letter read, calling on the administration to stand firm “as a defender of the weak and vulnerable.”

    The appeal follows a shocking study released Monday, which found that nearly 11% of women suffer severe or life-threatening complications after undergoing an abortion with mifepristone.

    As CatholicVote reported Monday, this complication rate is 22 times higher than what the FDA-approved label indicates.

    Please follow LifeNews.com on Gab for the latest pro-life news and info, free from social media censorship.

     “The FDA needs to recognize that this is a red alert,” CatholicVote’s Joshua Mercer said. “A serious complication rate this high would be intolerable for any drug, let alone the most controversial one.”

    Just days before the study’s release, FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary said the agency has “no plans to take action on mifepristone,” but left open the possibility of a future review if new data emerges.

    “I believe as a scientist that you’ve got to evolve as the data comes in,” Makary said. “So, if the data suggests something or tells us that there’s a real signal, then we can’t promise that we’re not going to act on that data that we have not yet seen.”

    Despite the growing concerns, the FDA’s website still calls mifepristone “safe and effective.” Pro-life researchers, including CatholicVote, have long criticized the drug’s rushed approval and the agency’s disregard of mounting evidence of its dangers.

    Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy also indicated earlier this year that Trump tasked him with reviewing the drug’s safety profile.

    “President Trump has made it clear to me that one of the things he has not taken a position yet is mifepristone, a detailed position,” Kennedy said during his January confirmation. “But he’s made it clear to me that he wants me to look at safety issues, and I’ll ask the [National Institutes of Health] and [Food and Drug Administration] to do that.”

    The pro-life coalition also warned that the Biden administration’s policy of mailing abortion pills has enabled abortionists to defy state pro-life laws.

    “Unfortunately, Democrats and the left are trampling on the rights of state legislators to implement the will of the people to protect life, and they are using the US Postal Service to do so,” the letter stated.

    The letter pointed to so-called “shield laws” in states like California and New York that protect abortionists who illegally ship mifepristone into pro-life states from prosecution.

    Two recent cases in Texas and Louisiana, where women suffered serious medical emergencies from mifepristone, were cited as examples. In both cases, the pills were reportedly sent by New York abortionist Margaret Carpenter, who was shielded from prosecution by Democrat governors.

    “There is substantial evidence indicating that some women are forced to take the medication, sometimes unknowingly,” the letter said. “This is exactly what happened in Louisiana where the law protects unborn children and their mothers from abortion.”

    “States must be empowered to enforce pro-life laws, all the original safety protocols on mifepristone must be restored, and the FDA must investigate mifepristone, reconsidering its approval altogether,” the letter concluded. “The lives of women and unborn children and the rights of states depend upon it.”

    The Trump administration has yet to publicly comment on whether it plans to take formal action following the coalition’s request.

    LifeNews Note: Elise DeGeeter writes for CatholicVote, where this column originally appeared.

    The post 30 Pro-Life Groups Ask Trump to Take Action Against Abortion Pill appeared first on LifeNews.com.

  50. Site: Zero Hedge
    4 days 15 hours ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    "Nothing To Do With Tariffs" - Trump Blames Biden "Overhang" As Stocks Puke After Q1 GDP

    US equity futures are tumbling in the pre-market following a weak ADP employment report and Q1 GDP contraction (driven by a tariff-front-running surge in imports).

    In the last month or two, we have been told that President Trump is not focused on the stock market, rejecting the idea of a 'Trump Put' (especially when it came to the decision to 'pause' reciprocal tariffs this month).

    However this morning, following the bad data and ugly equity drop, Trump posted on TruthSocial that "This is Biden’s Stock Market, not Trump’s."

    I didn’t take over until January 20th. 

    Tariffs will soon start kicking in, and companies are starting to move into the USA in record numbers. 

    Our Country will boom, but we have to get rid of the Biden “Overhang.” 

    This will take a while, has NOTHING TO DO WITH TARIFFS, only that he left us with bad numbers, but when the boom begins, it will be like no other.

    BE PATIENT!!!

    The surge in imports - which dragged down GDP - is due to the tariff decisions, there is no question.

    But also bear in mind that this is not a 'classic recessionary slowdown' in the economy, it is a front-running surge in imports 'ahead' of the tariffs and shrinking government spending.

    The former is a temporary impact, the latter is what America voted for!!

    Interestingly, rate-cut odds are rising notably after the data...

    Which makes us wonder if 'the market' is now switching to search for the 'Fed Put', not the 'Trump Put'.

     

    Tyler Durden Wed, 04/30/2025 - 09:28

Pages

Subscribe to Distinction Matter - Subscribed Feeds