Those who with God's help have welcomed Christ's call and freely responded to it are urged on by love of Christ to proclaim the Good News everywhere in the world.
Distinction Matter - Subscribed Feeds
-
Site: Zero HedgeKari Lake Strikes Deal For OAN To Provide News Content To Voice Of AmericaTyler Durden Fri, 05/09/2025 - 12:10
Authored by Tom Ozimek via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),
The U.S. Agency for Global Media (USAGM) will begin using content from broadcaster One America News Network (OAN).
Kari Lake speaks at a campaign event in Mesa, Ariz., on Sept. 4, 2024. Ross D. Franklin/AP Photo
Kari Lake, a former Arizona gubernatorial candidate and senior adviser to USAGM, unveiled the agreement in a May 6 statement, calling the OAN deal a taxpayer win. Under the deal, OAN will provide its video and news feed to USAGM’s networks—including Voice of America (VOA), Radio Martí, and the Office of Cuba Broadcasting—free of charge.
“This is an enormous benefit to the American taxpayer, who is the sole source of funding for USAGM’s news outlets, which broadcast only to international audiences,” Lake said, adding that she’s “grateful for their generosity.”
Lake said the idea originated with the Office of Cuba Broadcasting, which proposed OAN as a content partner for its Miami-based broadcasts to Cuba. After Lake reached out, OAN agreed to provide its English-language content at no cost.
Although Lake currently holds no editorial authority over VOA or Office of Cuba Broadcasting programming, she said the arrangement expands the range of news content available to agency journalists.
“In my current role as Senior Advisor to USAGM, I don’t have editorial control over the content of VOA and OCB programming, but I can ensure our outlets have reliable and credible options as they work to craft their reporting and news programs,” she said. “And every day, I look for ways to save American taxpayers money. Bringing in OAN as a video/news source does both.”
The content deal comes amid a sweeping overhaul of USAGM under President Donald Trump’s second-term plan to shrink the federal government and dismantle what he describes as wasteful agencies. A March executive order identified USAGM as one of eight federal entities slated for elimination or radical downsizing, directing agency heads to wind down all non-legally required functions.
In response, USAGM placed over 1,000 employees on leave and informed some 600 contractors their roles would be terminated as broadcasts were paused. The agency also began terminating contracts with major wire services—including The Associated Press, Reuters, and Agence France-Presse—which Lake called “expensive and unnecessary.”
“With a nearly billion-dollar budget, we should be producing news ourselves,” Lake said at the time. “If that’s not possible, the American taxpayer should demand to know why.”
Lake estimated the move would save $53 million annually and signaled a broader review of agency expenditures, saying she had discovered “a lot of nonsense that the American taxpayer should not be paying for.”
The reorganization has drawn sharp pushback from some VOA journalists and advocates. Two VOA staffers, White House bureau chief Patsy Widakuswara and press freedom editor Jessica Jerreat, are among several employees suing the Trump administration over its handling of the agency.
The two criticized the OAN content deal, saying it could undermine VOA’s credibility and editorial independence.
“Congress mandated VOA to report reliable and authoritative news, not to outsource its journalism to outlets aligned with the president’s agenda,” they said in a statement. “VOA already has talented and professional journalists ready to tell America’s story in line with the VOA Charter, but we are blocked from our own newsroom.”
Trump, who has frequently attacked public broadcasters such as NPR and PBS, has long viewed VOA as a source of liberal bias. In a March statement supporting the executive order to defund USAGM, the White House labeled VOA “The Voice of Radical America,” and declared that “taxpayers are no longer on the hook for radical propaganda.”
Democrats on the House Foreign Affairs Committee also criticized the OAN deal and the Trump administration’s characterization of VOA.
“The Trump administration smeared VOA and USAGM as radical and biased to justify gutting it. Now Kari Lake wants to repurpose VOA as a megaphone for OAN—a far-right, pro-Trump propaganda outlet,” they wrote in a post on X. “VOA was built to fight propaganda—not broadcast it.”
Meanwhile, a federal judge last month ordered the Trump administration to reinstate VOA employees, and an appeals court quickly blocked the ruling, finding that the lower court lacked the authority to intervene.
Launched in 2013, OAN is a family-owned media outlet known for its conservative perspectives.
-
Site: Mises InstituteThe blackout in Spain was not caused by a cyberattack but by the worst possible attack—that of politicians against their own citizens.
-
Site: LifeNews
Abortionist Christine Henneberg revealed in her 2022 memoir that Planned Parenthood trained her to send women with uterine perforations home without treatment, instead of to the hospital.
A Perforation is a Life-Threatening Complication
A uterine perforation occurs when an abortionist pokes a hole through the uterine wall. Medic-Journal calls a uterine perforation a “formidable complication” that can cause “life-threatening bleeding, peritonitis, [and] loss of reproductive function.”
Medic-Journal gives the symptoms of a uterine perforation as “intense pain in the lower abdomen and signs of intra-abdominal bleeding: bloody discharge from the vagina, weakness, dizziness, tachycardia.”
Please follow LifeNews.com on Gab for the latest pro-life news and info, free from social media censorship.
It says:
Untimely diagnosis of uterine perforation can lead to formidable and life-threatening complications and consequences. These include intestinal injuries or bladder injuries, massive hematomas, bleeding, peritonitis, sepsis.
Damage to the internal uterine pharynx can contribute to the formation of cervical insufficiency, miscarriage during subsequent pregnancy. Uterine perforation can have serious consequences for reproductive function and cause the development of infertility due to the formation of intrauterine adhesions (Asherman syndrome) or the need to remove the uterus.
Botched Abortions During Training
Henneberg learned to do abortions through the TEACH partnership, which stands for “Training in Early Abortion for Comprehensive Healthcare.”
However, the TEACH program (which was funded by abortion pill manufacturer Danco) also taught Henneberg to do second-trimester abortions.
Henneberg claims to have trained at Planned Parenthood of Long Beach under abortionist “Rebecca.”
During training, Henneberg reportedly perforated a woman’s uterus while committing an eight-week abortion. She told Rebecca. Henneberg says:
[Rebecca] had been checking something on her phone. She looked up. “Suction off,” she told the assistant. “Let me feel.” She placed her hands on the cannula and probed the wall of the uterus, feeling what I did.
“’Yup, you did,’ she said. ‘You perforated.’ She didn’t bat an eye.
Rebecca examined the abortion remains and confirmed that no fetal tissue remained in the uterus. She checked the woman again and told Henneberg, “Don’t worry. She’s going to be fine.”
Sending the Woman Home Instead of to the Hospital
Henneberg says:
My face must have been ashen. “Have you ever perforated before?” she asked me.
“No.”
She gave a little laugh. “The thing you have to remember is that abortions are one of the safest procedures there is. Perforation is like your worst nightmare, right? We are so careful to avoid it, and we should be.
But now it’s happened to you. You poked a little hole in her uterus. You have to watch her for bleeding, make sure you didn’t suck any bowel through with your cannula. But 99% of the time that doesn’t happen. You’ll watch her. She’ll go home. This will heal itself up in a few days.”
The protocol at Planned Parenthood is to send patients with perforations home instead of to the hospital. And they did.
Henneberg says, “At the end of it, she was fine. She went home. We went home. I couldn’t wait to go back the next morning.”
But was the woman really “fine”? Henneberg doesn’t mention any follow-up with the patient, and abortion facilities generally don’t know if a woman ends up going to an emergency room with bleeding or infection.
Henneberg perforated another woman’s uterus during the first procedure of the next day. This woman received the same “treatment.” They checked to see if they removed the whole baby (which should be done after every abortion), examined the perforation under ultrasound, checked bleeding, and sent her home.
Appropriate Treatment for a Uterine Perforation
According to Medic-Journal, this is the preferred treatment for a minor perforation:
If the perforation is incomplete, the hole is small, and there is absolute confidence in the absence of damage to the OBP, parametral hematoma and intra-abdominal bleeding, conservative-observational tactics can be undertaken. In this case, bed rest is prescribed, cold on the stomach, uterotonic drugs and antibiotics are used. Dynamic ultrasound control is carried out.
In other situations (in the presence of peritoneal symptoms and increasing signs of internal bleeding), laparoscopy or laparotomy, a thorough revision are indicated. If a small defect is detected in the uterine wall, they are limited to suturing the wound.
Henneberg didn’t suture the perforations and says nothing about medications or specific instructions to the women.
Henneberg has now made abortion her career, and says, “I still manage perforation according to the exact protocol we followed (twice) while I was training with [Rebecca].”
So she still sends women home with no treatment.
Women Who Have Died from Uterine Perforations
Here are just a few of the women who have died from perforations:
- Gloria Small was 43 and a mother of six.
- Germaine Newman was 14. Her mother found her dead at home the day after her abortion.
- Teresa Causey was 17. Her last words were “Oh, mama, mama, it hurts so much!”
- Margaret Paula Clodfelter was 19. Like Henneberg’s patients, she was sent home. She later died.
- Maureen Espinoza, 16, was also sent home. After she arrived at the hospital six days after her abortion, doctors tried two unsuccessful surgeries to save her life.
- Leigh Ann Stephens Alford, 34, died 18 hours after the facility sent her home with a perforated uterus.
- Virginia Wolfe, 33, died on the abortion table.
- Shirley Payne was 33.
- Rhonda Rollinson The abortionist couldn’t remove the whole baby. They sent Rhonda home with instructions to return to the facility another day to try again. She died instead.
- A 20-year-old Newark college student, name unknown, also died of a perforation, leaving her four-year-old son motherless.
- Anjelica Duarte, 21, left behind two daughters, ages three and one.
- Mickey Apodaca was 28. Her abortionist, Raymond E. Showery, was out on bail, appealing a murder conviction for drowning a baby girl who survived an abortion.He was charged with manslaughter for Apodaca’s death. While Showery was awaiting trial, local pro-abortion activists rallied outside the jail with signs supporting him and calling for his release.
- Carolina Gutierrez was 20. She suffered a massive infection after a uterine perforation.When Gutierrez realized she was sick, she called the abortion facility but was hung up on. Over two days, as her condition worsened, she left repeated messages, but no one from the facility returned her calls.
Surgeons amputated both her legs, trying to save her life, but she died six weeks after her abortion
Source: Christine Henneberg Boundless: An Abortion Doctor Becomes a Mother (San Francisco, California, 2022) 213, 214, 246—247, 263
LifeNews Note: Sarah Terzo covered the abortion issue for over 13 years as a professional journalist. In this capacity, she has written nearly a thousand articles about abortion and read over 850 books on the topic. She has been researching and writing about abortion since attending The College of New Jersey (class of 1997) where she minored in Women’s Studies. This article originally appeared on Sarah Terzo’s Substack. You can read more of her articles here. This article originally appeared on Live Action News.
The post Abortionist Says Planned Parenthood Trained Her to Send Women Home With Injuries From Botched Abortions appeared first on LifeNews.com.
-
Site: non veni pacem
(Regardless of any past irregularities, Pope Prevost, if truly Pope, now enjoys the supernatural protection of the Petrine Promises. The heresies in Amoris, and the heresy of Synodality, must be addressed. So let us converge these two realities and find out who’s who and what’s what. -nvp)
Here’s an idea to bring about healing and peace: Let the “Dubia Cardinals” re-submit the 2016 Dubia (Amoris) and 2023 Dubia (Synodality)
Posted on 9 May 2025 by Fr. John Zuhlsdorf
One of the things that a new Pope has to do, is tie up the loose ends left by his predecessor.
There are no ends looser that one can imagine that the DUBIA about Amoris laetitia submitted in 2016 to Francis by the “Four Dubia Cardinals” (Burke, Brandmüller, Caffarra+, Meisner+).
There were also dubia submitted in 2023 about synodality by five Cardinals (Brandmüller, Sarah, Sandoval Íñiguez, Burke, and Zen).
Resubmit the dubia Leo when things settle down.
This could be a foundational moment of healing at the beginning of a new Pontificate as well as a gesture of continuity with the last years out of which those sets of – serious! – questions were submitted by serious and highly credentialed men of the Church, Cardinals, fulfilling their duty to advise the Pope.
It might not be the best timing to resubmit these before the ink on Leo’s first signature is dry, but sometime soon when things are settling down, they could ask for the healing gesture of clarifications to their questions.
Responses could be a great consolation for a lot of people who have struggled in confusion about the Church’s teachings on some matters.
Some might argue that resubmitting the dubia would make him defensive. I think it depends on how they are resubmitted and in what moment.
-
Site: PeakProsperityPerhaps one of the most troubling aspects of the woke mind virus is its near-total inability to square up with reality. The lack of progress by Trump in arresting the architects promoting the mind virus suggests that we'd best be prepared for some serious difficulties.
-
Site: Zero HedgeGround Stop Issued At Newark AirportTyler Durden Fri, 05/09/2025 - 11:15
New Jersey's Newark Liberty International Airport (EWR) has again been thrown into turbulence. Earlier, air traffic control radar screens briefly went dark—for the second time in weeks—and now the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has issued a ground stop due to ongoing runway construction. It's yet another confidence blow for travelers.
ABC News reports that radar systems operated by air traffic controllers at EWR experienced a brief outage around 0355ET:
Air traffic controllers could be heard telling a FedEx plane that their screens went dark and then asking the aircraft to tell their company to put pressure on to get the problem fixed.
In another transmission, a controller told an arriving private jet that the airport just had a brief radar outage and to stay at or above 3,000 feet in case the controllers couldn't get in touch during the aircraft's descent.
ABC noted this was the second ATC computer outage in a week:
Last week, an outage at Newark caused ATC computer screens to go dark for roughly 60 to 90 seconds and prevented controllers from talking to aircraft during that time, according to multiple sources with knowledge of the incident. As a result, the Federal Aviation Administration briefly halted all departures to the airport.
Hours later, around 1000 ET, reports hit the wires that the FAA issued a ground stop at EWR because of runway construction, staffing shortages, and equipment troubles, according to local media outlet PIX11.
The flight-tracking website FlightAware shows that EWR has about 100 flights delayed so far this morning.
On Thursday afternoon, former ABC and Fox News anchor John Stossel released a video calling Newark Airport a "disaster," arguing that air traffic control should be taken out of the hands of the bloated federal government and handed over to private companies instead.
Newark Airport is a disaster.
— John Stossel (@JohnStossel) May 8, 2025
Now Trump vows to upgrade the “horrible” air traffic system.
It was obsolete decades ago.
No private company would allow that
Private companies upgrade.
We should privatize air traffic control: pic.twitter.com/aS9VyPGi2fAlso on Thursday, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy announced new, "state-of-the-art" ATC systems will replace "antiquated" ones...
Why didn't the Biden administration focus on upgrading America's flight radars and ATC systems? They were too focused on toxic DEI and discussing how to identify a woman.
* * *
On Sale! Grab a complete 2-day emergency survival backpack at ZH Store
Click pic... add to cart (one for each car & your go-bag storage)... be more prepared. Satisfaction guaranteed or your money back.
-
Site: LifeNews
Ahead of next week’s markup of the budget reconciliation bill in the House Energy & Commerce Committee, SBA Pro-Life America President Marjorie Dannenfelser issued the following statement:
“We urge President Trump, Vice President Vance, and congressional Republicans to stand up for American taxpayers and stop forced funding of the big abortion industry in the reconciliation bill. We will proudly score in favor of the ‘one big beautiful bill’ that includes this vital priority.
“President Trump and congressional Republicans included this effort in the 2017 reconciliation bill, and we have a historic opportunity to get the job done in 2025.
Follow LifeNews on the MeWe social media network for the latest pro-life news free from Facebook’s censorship!
“Doing so is an extension of the work President Trump has already accomplished this term to stop taxpayer funding of the abortion industry abroad and reapplying the Hyde Amendment across government spending after Joe Biden brazenly ignored it.
“Planned Parenthood performs nearly 400,000 abortions per year while raking in $2 million per day, or nearly $700 million per year in taxpayer funding. During the 2024 election cycle they spent $70 million to try to defeat Donald Trump and Republicans up and down the ticket. They are a political juggernaut designed to protect their big abortion business and their hundreds of millions in tax dollars. President Trump and congressional Republicans can finally stop this.
“The good news is that women will receive better care at community health centers across the country that outnumber Planned Parenthood facilities by a 15:1 margin. They provide much more comprehensive care and do not perform abortions.
“It’s time to stand up for taxpayers who oppose forced funding of abortion and ensure women get better care that is more comprehensive and more available than Planned Parenthood.”
The post Pro-Life Group to Trump and GOP: Planned Parenthood Kills Almost 400,000 Babies. Defund it Now appeared first on LifeNews.com.
-
Site: Zero HedgeWhite Smoke All AroundTyler Durden Fri, 05/09/2025 - 11:00
By Elwin de Groot, Rabobank head of macro strategy
White smoke! We have a new *American* Pope, the first, Leo XIV. And we also have the first trade deal! Over the last few weeks market participants had been anxiously awaiting results from the negotiations between the Trump administration and all those countries looking for closure. Expectations were riding high that it was going to be major trading partners such as India, Japan – or even the EU – that would clinch a deal first, but the happy receiver of the good news turned out to be the United Kingdom. Having a Royal Family (recall PM Starmer invited President Trump to Buckingham Palace on behalf of the King at his recent White House visit) may have actually paid out well. Those who like FTAs say it isn’t 3,000-pages and legally binding. Those who understand geopolitics know Tehran, Yalta, and Potsdam weren’t long on technocrats either. But they still changed the entire world order - the technocrats tidied things up later.
Earlier yesterday Trump had already posted that he would reveal a “full and comprehensive” trade deal with the UK. That turned out to be more like a framework agreement without creating any legal obligations right now. But there were some -important- details.
-
The US will get lower tariffs and can push special interests like beef and ethanol, creating a potential market access worth USD 5bn (although the ‘chlorinated chicken’ issue was avoided in the Oval office show).
-
And the UK will buy $10bn of Boeing jets (in fact it turned out to be Spain-based IAG SA, and as part of a broader package including Airbus jets).
-
There was no mention of the UK’s Digital Services Tax, a positive for the UK.
-
Yet the UK is still going to face 10% on most exports - for the closest US ally; a 100,000 car quota at 10% not 25%; and steel & aluminium (& pharma?) & engines for (fighter) jets **tariff free**.
The latter shows the UK in the US bloc for national security supply chains. But a more nuanced conclusion could also be that the US is simply doing damage control to ensure those engines – which were already part of existing (military) supply chains – will keep coming into the US tariff-free. In any case, as UK negotiator Peter Mandelson summarized it diplomatically: “we’re going to rebalance and rebuild international trade in a way that serves all our interests”. And he added that the agreement would serve as a springboard for further opening up of trade between the countries. Whether that means the 10% tariff on remaining goods is subject to renegotiations is unclear at this stage.
Remarkably, there was no mention of China, but this was called “an economic security blanket” - whom else does that cover? Indeed, the Telegraph says “Starmer hands Trump ‘veto’ on Chinese investment in UK” - as a start(?) Again, critics wanted more, as if this were still the Rules-Based Order. It isn’t. This deal undermines the WTO. Which is the point - and it was agreed by a UK government committed to the old global system because it couldn’t see anything better (unless it's playing for time and isn't serious, in which case Trump might really turn up the heat). The US template is now there for others to follow, as PIMCO warns Trump is really serious about keeping really serious tariffs for those who won’t play his new ball game.
Indeed, the broader message of this is that although the US is willing to climb down from the very high stakes it started this trade war with (“because we blew up the whole system, this [UK deal] worked out so nicely”, Trump said), it may not budge on the universal tariff and it wants a clear stake in strategic supply chains and (economic) security matters in exchange for a reduction in sectoral or reciprocal tariffs.
On that front, things aren’t going so well on talks with China, as those who understand the protocols point out. Meanwhile, the European Commission yesterday published a list of US export goods worth some EUR95bn that it would hit with higher tariffs if trade negotiations fail. The list includes aircraft, US cars and car parts, chemicals and plastics, machinery, electric goods and agrifood products, such as… bourbon. The actual level of EU tariffs that would apply will be decided at a later date. Politico argues that, as “Brussels moves ahead with its retaliation, conceding its transatlantic ties with Washington may be beyond repair.” Whilst that may be too stark a conclusion at this point as the Commission is emphasizing the ‘rebalancing’ nature of the list and a strong wish to come to an agreement, we also note that European Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic already had hinted last week that the EU would not settle for a 10% blank reciprocal tariff. The UK, a country the US has a net trade surplus with (“balanced” says Lutnick), just did. Albeit with some exceptions to it.
Whether it is going to help that the EU actually has lots of kings and queens remains to be seen, although treating the US with great respect will obviously be a key prerequisite. But a far more important lesson we could draw from the US-UK trade deal is that the US has to be able to show its benefits in raw dollar terms to the US public (‘beef and ethanol’) and any agreement will have to include a clear path towards stronger influence and benefits for the US from key European strategic supply chains and free access to strategic goods, so that a common agreement can be sold as one that “rebalances and rebuilds international trade in a way that serves all our interests.” It remains to be seen whether the EU has the will and the mandate to do what PM Starmer just did. And, at best, the EU may have to settle at 10% blank.
Turning to markets, equities were up because we had a trade deal after all. Risk premiums fell and US treasury yields soared, as we had a trade deal after all (and note that if we follow the market’s reasoning thus far, which is that the trade war is bad for growth but not so big a concern for inflation, trade deals simply mean lesser negative economic impact and so higher rates). A rise in US unit labor costs of 5.7% q/q saar in Q1 did not help either there. The yield on the 5y Treasury note jumped more than 12bp; it’s German counterpart saw a 7bp rise.
Sterling appreciated vis-à-vis the dollar in the run-up to the US-UK trade agreement and this move was only briefly interjected by the Bank of England’s rate cut. However, as the trade deal ‘details’ emerged, sterling fell back. For even as the UK looks to have secured a deal, weaker global growth still weighs on demand for its exports, dragging down UK growth. And 10% is, well, still 10%. In that light, the rate cut by the Bank of England – which was widely expected – was well-timed . The vote, though, was split three ways. We interpret this as that there is simply too much uncertainty out there and the MPC wants to avoid the impression of groupthink and hubris. The central bank maintained its guidance for gradual and careful cuts. No hints were dropped about a potential cut in June. However, we think a very soft April CPI print might just push them over the edge. Even so, our baseline forecast remains quarterly cuts. We anticipate two more reductions this year, bringing the policy rate to 3.75%, with downside risks.
Habemas Happy Friday.
-
-
Site: LifeNews
The Trump administration has fully implemented the defunding of the UNFPA that it announced back in March and announced today that no new funding will the directed to it. And the pro-abortion agency is unhappy.
As LifeNews reported then, Trump has ordered the defunding of the UNFPA, a United Nations population control agency which promotes abortions worldwide.
This is a continuation of his pro-life policy from his previous administration. In 2017, Trump signed an executive order defunding the UN population group because it pushes abortions on other countries and has worked with China for decades to implement its forced abortion population control policies.
Trump officials previously informed the UN Population Fund that nearly all of its grants would be discontinued. That defunding has taken place – with some $335 million in taxpayer funds yanked from the pro-abortion UN agency. Now, Trump officials have informed the UN group that new funding will not take place in future years.
In a statement to LifeNews, UNFPA officials decried the defunding.
HELP LIFENEWS SAVE BABIES FROM ABORTION! Please help LifeNews.com with a donation!
“UNFPA, the United Nations sexual and reproductive health agency, notes with deep regret that the United States of America has announced its intention to deny future funding to the organization by triggering the Kemp-Kasten Amendment,” it said. “It comes in addition to termination notices UNFPA has already received … amounting to some $335 million in funding.”
“UNFPA remains keen to maintain an open dialogue with the US Government, including through the UNFPA Executive Board, of which the USA is a member. We urge the United States to reconsider its stance,” it said.
A reconsideration of the defunding would be easy if the UNFPA stopped promoting abortions worldwide, but the UN agency is more devoted to its abortion agenda that humanitarian work that could receive federal funding.
The defending is a result of the pro-life executive order Trump signed in January that prohibits American tax dollars to groups that promote or provide abortions overseas. Thr order directed the Secretary of State to take all necessary actions, to the extent permitted by law, to ensure that U.S. taxpayer dollars do not fund organizations or programs that support or participate in the management of a program of coercive abortion or involuntary sterilization.
The new memorandum specifically directs the Secretary of State to review programs under the Kemp-Kasten amendment, a provision of U.S. law that states that no U.S. funds may be made available to “any organization or program which, as determined by the [p]resident of the United States, supports or participates in the management of a program of coercive abortion or involuntary sterilization.”
During his first week in office last term, Trump signed the Mexico City policy in one of his first acts as president. The pro-life policy prohibits American tax dollars to groups that promote or provide abortions overseas. The move defunded two major abortion chains of hundreds of millions of American tax dollars. The International Planned Parenthood Federation alone estimated a $100 million loss from its budget.
The Mexico City policy, which began with President Ronald Reagan, historically has been supported by pro-life presidents and rescinded by pro-abortion presidents. Trump went further though. He not only reinstated the policy but also expanded it by increasing the number of global health assistance funds and government programs that are covered under the policy.
The United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) has a long history of supporting China’s population control regime.
According to information from he Family Research Council, both Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush cut off funding to the UNFPA during their administrations. In 1993, President Bill Clinton resumed funding for UNFPA, but for fiscal year 1999 signed a foreign aid appropriations bill that zeroed out funding for UNFPA. Funding to UNFPA was again completely cut off under President George W. Bush.
In 2008, then-Secretary of State Colin Powell explained: “UNFPA’s support of, and involvement in, China’s population-planning activities allows the Chinese government to implement more effectively its program of coercive abortion. Therefore, it is not permissible to continue funding UNFPA at this time.”
President Obama resumed U.S. taxpayer funding of UNFPA in 2009. From 2009 to 2016, over $300 million was appropriated for UNFPA.
The Mexico City Policy is a policy that prohibits U.S. government global health funding from being used to fund foreign nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) that perform or promote abortion. The policy also blocks foreign organizations that receive global health grants from providing any type of financial assistance to other foreign NGOs that perform or promote abortion.
In 2017, the Trump administration renamed the Mexico City Policy the Protecting Life in Global Health Assistance Policy (PLGHA).
Currently, the Protecting Life in Global Health Assistance Policy only applies to certain kinds of U.S. government awards—the policy currently only applies grants and cooperative agreements. The new proposed rule issued by the Trump administration last week, however, would extend the policy to contracts as well.
The policy requires foreign contractors that sign onto U.S. government global health contracts to certify that they will not perform or promote abortion or provide financial assistance to any foreign pro-abortion organization for the duration of their award. Foreign contractors would be banned from conducting any activities directly aimed at encouraging women to seek abortion and they would be prohibited from lobbying activities in support of the legalization of abortion.
The Protecting Life in Global Health Assistance Policy in included as a clause in their contract agreement and contractors would be required to pass down the policy to any subcontractors.
Reggie Littlejohn, president of Women’s Rights Without Frontiers, previously told LifeNews:
“UNFPA has been found to be complicit with coercive population control in China in the past, and I have no doubt that any unbiased investigation would find them complicit again. I have long advocated for the defunding of UNFPA.”
The post Trump Fully Defunds Pro-Abortion UNFPA, Yanks $335 Million in Funding appeared first on LifeNews.com.
-
Site: southern orders
I CAN LIVE WITH POPE LEO THE GREAT.This is what Franciscan Media says about Pope Leo the Great:
Saint Leo the Great’s Story
With apparent strong conviction of the importance of the Bishop of Rome in the Church, and of the Church as the ongoing sign of Christ’s presence in the world, Leo the Great displayed endless dedication as pope. Elected in 440, he worked tirelessly as “Peter’s successor,” guiding his fellow bishops as “equals in the episcopacy and infirmities.”
Leo is known as one of the best administrative popes of the ancient Church. His work branched into four main areas, indicative of his notion of the pope’s total responsibility for the flock of Christ. He worked at length to control the heresies of Pelagianism—overemphasizing human freedom—Manichaeism—seeing everything material as evil—and others, placing demands on their followers so as to secure true Christian beliefs.
A second major area of his concern was doctrinal controversy in the Church in the East, to which he responded with a classic letter setting down the Church’s teaching on the two natures of Christ. With strong faith, he also led the defense of Rome against barbarian attack, taking the role of peacemaker.
In these three areas, Leo’s work has been highly regarded. His growth to sainthood has its basis in the spiritual depth with which he approached the pastoral care of his people, which was the fourth focus of his work. He is known for his spiritually profound sermons. An instrument of the call to holiness, well-versed in Scripture and ecclesiastical awareness, Leo had the ability to reach the everyday needs and interests of his people. One of his sermons is used in the Office of Readings on Christmas.
It is said of Leo that his true significance rests in his doctrinal insistence on the mysteries of Christ and the Church and in the supernatural charisms of the spiritual life given to humanity in Christ and in his Body, the Church. Thus Leo held firmly that everything he did and said as pope for the administration of the Church represented Christ, the head of the Mystical Body, and Saint Peter, in whose place Leo acted.
-
Site: Zero HedgeTrump Delinks Saudi Nuclear Energy Deal From Israel NormalizationTyler Durden Fri, 05/09/2025 - 10:40
The United States is no longer linking negotiations for a Saudi nuclear energy program with a normalization deal for Riyadh to recognize Israel based on the Abraham Accords.
US Energy Secretary Chris Wright in April while on a visit to Saudi Arabia mentioned a "pathway" to a civil nuclear agreement, even though the Saudis were insisting that there would be no normalized ties with Israel until it ceases Gaza military action, and allows for a Palestinian state. This was a first strong hint that the new administration was ready to delink the two issues.
"Dropping the demand that Saudi Arabia establish diplomatic relations with Israel would be a major concession by Washington," Reuters now reports. "Under former President Joe Biden, nuclear talks were an element of a wider U.S.-Saudi deal tied to normalization and to Riyadh's goal of a defense treaty with Washington."
During the first Trump administration, via Reuters.
This could pave the way for a Saudi nuclear deal breakthrough during President Trump's visit next week. Wright explained, "For a US partnership and involvement in nuclear here, there will definitely be a 123 agreement ... there's lots of ways to structure a deal that will accomplish both the Saudi objectives and the American objectives."
As we detailed previously, US involvement in Saudi Arabia's nuclear program would require a so-called "123 Agreement," referring to Section 123 of the US Atomic Energy Act of 1954. This section outlines nine non-proliferation requirements designed to prevent the use of civil nuclear technology for weapons development or the transfer of sensitive materials.
Washington appears to be readying an issuance of official permission regarding this key restriction. After all, Trump typically visits the Gulf while bearing 'gifts'.
While the Joe Biden White House had sought a broader deal involving nuclear cooperation, security guarantees for the kingdom, and normalization with Israel, Wright's April remarks focused narrowly on energy partnership. Saudi Arabia aims to expand renewable and nuclear energy as part of its Vision 2030 reforms.
In addition to dropping the demand to normalize with Israel, the US has also nixed efforts to ink a US-Saudi mutual defense treaty with Riyadh. And crucially, these talks to approve a Saudi nuclear program are being advanced without consulting Israel. The Netanyahu government will no doubt reject the possibility of a future nuclear-capable Saudi Arabia.
Israel Hayom has written that "The president won’t be able to get approval to push forward a civilian nuclear program for Saudi Arabia without the Israeli component," according to an Israeli official. "He doesn’t have a Senate majority for any agreement that doesn’t include Israel or that moves forward without its consent."
Saudi energy minister Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman with US Secretary of Energy Chris Wright, SPA
As for other things Trump is expected to announce on his Gulf tour next week, he will likely to announce a series of new major arms deals with the kingdom. While during his first administration he visited Saudi Arabia very early on, the Saudis have appeared to be lower on the list of priorities this time around.
-
Site: OnePeterFive
Ludwig von Pastor’s massive History of the Popes from the Close of the Middle Ages is an interesting source to go to for reactions to the election of the head of the Roman Church. First impressions of the general bearing of a man who would bear the weight of the world on his shoulders were in no way considered superficial in the past. People put a great stress on everything…
-
Site: Zero HedgeInside CBDC's Anti-Trump RebrandTyler Durden Fri, 05/09/2025 - 10:20
Authored by Kit Knightly via Off-Guardian.org,
The planned rollout of a planet-wide network of “interoperable” digital currencies has shifted gears this year.
Digital Currency is still the endgame, but – in keeping with the spirit of the age – it seems they are changing the method to create the illusion of sides and choices.
We covered this briefly our most recent This Week in the New Normal, but it’s worth a deeper dive.
For years now OffG (and many others in the alternative media sphere) have covered the plans for programmable digital currency as a means for technocratic social control. This goal is years old, but first came to real prominence in the wake of the Covid “pandemic” and the attempted re-shaping of our entire society that entailed.
From 2020 to 2023, the development of “central bank digital currencies” (CBDCs) around the world was a steady upward line, reaching its peak when 130+ of the 197 nations on the planet, representing over 98% of the world’s economic output, were in the process of developing their own CBDC.
But then things went quiet, and some nations – including Japan and Canada – announced they would no longer be moving forward with their CBDC.
Why that would be I couldn’t say, except to speculate that concerns about control and privacy became too widely publicized, and market research indicated too much public scepticism to proceed.
Evidence for this can be found in the FinTech article “Bank of Canada Puts CBDC Development on Ice: Is This Indicative of Global CBDC Demise?”, from September 2024:
“The truth is that people don’t really want CBDCs,” says Stuart Connolly, CIO at investment and operating company Deus X Capital. He explains that concerns about freedom and privacy are still rife when it comes to CBDCs. “They have been roundly rejected by the business and crypto communities, and privacy advocates have campaigned against them because they are best suited to authoritarian economies where transparency can infringe upon freedoms and the creation of money and wealth are heavily controlled. Ultimately, there are few benefits to CBDCs and they simply aren’t compelling.”
That’s just an opinion of one man, of course, but it does jive with my instinctive feeling – CBDCs got too much bad press, and a shift in tactics was needed.
This brings us to 2025. There has been more movement on the CBDC front this year.
On April 9th the EU published the final draft of its “Digital Euro Bill”, and then just a few days ago, the European Central Bank announced a deal with 70 corporate trading partners to test “usage cases” for digital Euro transactions.
In the UK, the Bank of England is testing out offline payment systems for the Digital Pound.
Canada just *ahem* “elected” Mark Carney as their new Prime Minister, and while the Bank of Canada allegedly “scaled down” work on its CBDC last year, Carney has expressed very clear pro-CBDC thoughts in the past. It wouldn’t be shocking to see it restarted in a new “elbows up, look at us standing up to Donald Trump” context.
Indeed, that’s now the heart of the CBDC story.
The role of Donald Trump and the USA
Unusually, in modern propaganda narratives, the United States always seemed an almost reluctant participant in the CBDC scheme. While the digital Yuan, Euro and Pound were making strides, the digital dollar was stagnating in the planning stages, with reports claiming it was not feasible, safe or necessary.
Then, when Trump was elected to his second term, he vetoed the digital dollar completely via executive order. Banning all development of a central bank-backed digital dollar.
That’s not to say the Trump Administration is anti-digital money entirely. Rather, they plan to rely on dollar-backed private stablecoins. In basic terms, they still want a digital currency, they’re just not so crazy about the “central bank” part.
This makes it more of a semantic difference than anything else. It’s all about marketing, messaging and branding. The now cliché routine of promoting [thing] by having Donald Trump come out against it.
If Trump is anti-CBDCs then a near-decade of Pavlovian conditioning means almost every “liberal” in the Western world will suddenly be violently pro-CBDCs to the point of madness. CBDCs will become some weird badge of freedom to these people.
Further, since the dollar’s status as the world’s reserve currency has always been one of the key support beams in American hegemony, any threat to that status instantly becomes “anti-Imperialism”, casting the digital Yuan and/or Euro as the preferred currency of the anti-Imperialists.
There’s more, potentially, too. I have discussed what I believe to be the planned controlled demolition of the US Empire before, and could easily see Trump’s “short-sighted CBDC reluctance” playing a part in that, as the managed decline of the US is part-blamed on the surge of digital Yuan and Euros dominating the market.
That’s certainly what you can take away from articles like this one in Forbes, which headlines:
America’s Self-Inflicted CBDC Vacuum
And bemoans the fact that:
By pulling the Federal Reserve out of Project Cedar, retreating from the BIS-led Project mBridge, and gagging Treasury officials who had been mapping a cross-border dollar pilot, Washington has ceded the initiative to Europe, where policymakers are racing to finalise a “digital euro,” and to Beijing, which is already moving oil money through e-CNY corridors.
There’s also this piece in The Conversation, which suggests…
The New Cold War race for digital currencies could redefine global power.
And goes on to highlight:
Nations vulnerable to US sanctions, including China, are particularly attracted to these CBDC-based settlement networks – as the US continues to weaponise its dollar. Just one way is through sanctions that exclude certain countries from the SWIFT system: they’ve been described as “the nuclear option” of financial sanctions […] CBDC networks allow nations to bypass traditional financial infrastructure and reduce reliance on the US dollar in cross-border trade.
The intended propaganda narrative is becoming quite clear. CBDCs are being linked to freedom from the US dollar and – more specifically – Donald Trump.
Indeed, this April article from Reuters essentially credits Donald Trump’s ban with rejuvenating the global CBDC movement:
Central bank digital currencies have often been deemed a solution in search of a problem. But U.S. President Donald Trump appears to have provided a rationale for CBDCs, even as he has banned the development of a digital dollar.
Conclusion
So, what is the current state of CBDCs?
A brief analysis would suggest that it serves almost as a microcosm of the Great Reset in general, in which grand plans for worldwide changes stalled at the halfway mark because the people pushing the scheme underestimated the speed of public understanding and power of public reluctance.
Now, we are witnessing the early stages of a re-launch as a faux partisan issue.
In this instance, the specific context is Donald Trump’s “trade war”, which will see CBDCs rebranded as a sensible non-Trumpian option and a way of rejecting US dollar dominance (or maybe even circumventing tariffs, look out for that in the future).
Who knows, maybe we’ll even look back at the “damage” caused by “Trump’s trade war”, and be told that digital currencies would prevent a future where the world’s economy is “held hostage by one narcissist” or something along those lines.
That will cleanly sweep the “left” into the pro-CBDC camp.
Meanwhile, to mop up the stragglers on the populist “right”, Donald Trump’s America (and maybe a few others for appearances’ sake) will have their alternative non-central bank digital currencies instead.
Creating what this FinTech article calls a “bifurcated” financial system. Or the appearance of one at least.
There are already academic papers talking up the benefits of stablecoins and CBDCs “co-existing”, and it’s not hard to see that translating into a financial two-party system – the illusion of choice and difference. Two bodies sharing a head.
But the branding will allow each “side” to point out the superficial differences between the systems and contrast their good social control with the other “side’s” bad social control, and engender tribalism along predictable old-fashioned lines.
They’ll be “interoperable” too, of course, because that’s the whole point. But people will be too invested in the argument to notice or understand what that really means.
-
Site: OnePeterFive
I must admit that I didn’t really consider the possibility that a Pope from the United States might be elected. And if I had to bet on an American Pope, the name would certainly not have been that of Cardinal Robert Francis Prevost, of whom I knew little or nothing. But the Cardinals have chosen him as the successor of Peter, and for that decision, I can only accept that he is my Bishop and…
-
Site: LifeNews
President Donald Trump expressed confidence that Republicans will resolve internal disagreements to advance legislation defunding Planned Parenthood.
“I don’t know yet. I have to see because you’re just telling me that for the first time, we’ll work something out,” Trump said in response to questions about opposition from some House Republicans to including Planned Parenthood defunding provisions in this year’s reconciliation bill.
The reconciliation process, which allows legislation to pass the Senate with a simple majority, offers Republicans a rare opportunity to strip federal funding from Planned Parenthood, the nation’s largest abortion business. Pro-life groups argue that taxpayer dollars, even if not directly funding abortions, indirectly subsidize Planned Parenthood’s operations, which include killing over 390,000 babies every year.
HELP LIFENEWS SAVE BABIES FROM ABORTION! Please help LifeNews.com with a donation!
However, three House Republicans—Reps. John Curtis of Utah, Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, and Anthony D’Esposito of New York—are reportedly hesitant to support the defunding measure with Planned Parenthood defunding in it. They fear political backlash in their competitive 2026 reelection campaigns.
Pro-life advocates emphasize that community health centers, which outnumber Planned Parenthood clinics and provide comprehensive care without abortions, can absorb patients if funding is redirected.
House Speaker Mike Johnson, a staunch pro-life advocate, has signaled that defunding “big abortion” is a priority in the reconciliation bill, which also addresses Trump’s agenda on taxes, border security, and energy.
The Hyde Amendment already prohibits federal funds from directly paying for abortions, except in cases of rape, incest, or to save the mother’s life. However, Planned Parenthood receives approximately $700 million annually through Medicaid reimbursements and Title X grants. Pro-life leaders argue this funding frees up resources for Planned Parenthood’s abortion operations.
The reconciliation bill, which allows legislation to pass with a simple majority in both chambers, is seen as a critical opportunity to strip federal funding from Planned Parenthood, the nation’s largest abortion business. The abortion company received nearly $700 million in taxpayer funds in its 2022-2023 fiscal year, killing 392,715 babies in abortions, according to its annual report.
House Speaker Mike Johnson has voiced support for defunding Planned Parenthood, stating on Fox News that he is “working to build the votes” needed to pass such a measure through reconciliation.
At the annual gala of the pro-life group Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America last week, Johnson pledged that the reconciliation bill “is going to redirect funds away from ‘big abortion.’”
However, with a narrow Republican majority, even a small number of holdouts could derail the effort, as no pro-life Democrats are expected to support the measure.
Pro-life groups, including Students for Life of America and Family Research Council, have intensified lobbying efforts, with hundreds of activists visiting Capitol Hill in recent weeks to press lawmakers. A coalition of over 150 national and state pro-life organizations has called for action, emphasizing that Planned Parenthood’s federal funding, primarily through Medicaid, must be redirected.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) wants the big budget reconciliation plan extending President Donald Trump’s tax cuts sent to his desk — ready for signature — by July 4. House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) would like it even sooner: Memorial Day.
Meanwhile, Representative Mary Miller (R-Ill.) is waging a fierce campaign among her Republican colleagues to make defunding Planned Parenthood a non-negotiable piece of the final proposal.
On Monday, Miller sent a passionate letter to Rep. Brett Guthrie (R-Ky.), chairman of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, obtained by Breitbart News. In it, she urged Guthrie to “use every legislative option available to cease all federal funds going to Planned Parenthood,” exposing the organization’s deep entanglement in abortion and transgender treatments. “Abortions and transgender treatments have exploded in clinics across the country,” she wrote.
Citing the Charlotte Lozier Institute, Miller highlighted that “abortions made up 97.1% of Planned Parenthood’s pregnancy services from 2021-2022, performing nearly 400,000 abortions.” She also underscored the crisis in her home state, noting, “In 2023, my home state of Illinois performed 72,143 abortions, the most in our history since the state started reporting abortion totals in 1973.” Miller laid bare Planned Parenthood’s financial empire, stating, “Due to a lack of decisive Congressional action, Planned Parenthood has become a federally funded health network with private assets valued at $2.5 billion. Recent numbers show that Planned Parenthood received nearly $700 million in taxpayer revenue from 2022-2023.”
Her letter concluded with a call to action: “It is essential that we protect taxpayer dollars and stop funding this organization. President Trump has already issued an Executive Order that implements such a plan. Therefore, I urge you to do everything possible to ensure Planned Parenthood never receives another penny of taxpayer dollars.”
Speaking to Breitbart, Miller doubled down, declaring, “Planned Parenthood is a multi-billion-dollar abortion business that continues to receive millions in federal funding.” She praised Trump’s leadership, stating, “President Trump had it right when he issued an Executive Order to cut off taxpayer dollars from abortion providers like Planned Parenthood,” and insisted, “it’s time for Congress to make that policy permanent. I urge the Energy and Commerce Committee to ensure that not another dime of American tax dollars goes to this murder-for-profit organization.”
The post Trump Says GOP Will “Work Something Out” to Defund Planned Parenthood appeared first on LifeNews.com.
-
Site: Mises InstituteThe transatlantic slave trade from Africa is a well-known chapter in the history of slavery in the Western Hemisphere, but much lesser known is the enslavement of Native Americans. Many of them were shipped to plantations in the Caribbean where they were worked to death.
-
Site: southern orders
PLEASE NOTE WHAT I HIGHLIGHT IN BOLD REDFROM VATICAN NEWS:
Inaugural Mass of Pope Leo XIV to be held on May 18
The Holy See announces the upcoming schedule for the newly elected Pontiff, including the Mass to begin his pontificate.Vatican News
The Holy See Press Office announced the upcoming schedule for the newly elected Pope Leo XIV. His inaugural Mass will be held in St. Peter’s Square on Sunday, May 18 at 10am Rome time.
Three weeks of firsts
On Saturday, May 10, the 267th Pope will hold a meeting with the Cardinals and mark his first public appearance his election with the Regina Caeli prayer and greeting from the Central Loggia of St. Peter’s Basilica on May 11.
Then, Pope Leo XIV’s schedule will be as follows:
- May 12, Monday – Meeting with the international press
- May 16, Friday – Meeting with the Diplomatic Corps (Heads of Mission)
- May 18, Sunday - 10:00 AM, St. Peter’s Square: Mass for the Beginning of the Pontificate
- May 20, Tuesday - Taking possession of the Papal Basilica of St. Paul Outside the Walls
- May 21, Wednesday - First General Audience
- May 24, Saturday - Meeting with the Roman Curia and Vatican City State employees
- May 25, Sunday - Regina Caeli
- Taking possession of the Papal Basilica of St. John Lateran
- Taking possession of the Papal Basilica of St. Mary Major
In another statement, the Press Office shared the Holy Father’s “wish that the Heads and Members of the Institutions of the Roman Curia, as well as the Secretaries and the President of the Pontifical Commission for the Vatican City State, continue, on a provisional basis” in their respective roles donec aliter provideatur (until otherwise provided).
Pope Leo XIV, however, maintains the right to “a certain amount of time for reflection, prayer, and dialogue” before making any “definitive appointments or confirmations.”
- May 12, Monday – Meeting with the international press
-
Site: Zero HedgeWatch: Anti-Musk Activists Crush Tesla With Tank In Politically-Motivated StuntTyler Durden Fri, 05/09/2025 - 10:00
Unhinged activists from the British political group "Led By Donkeys" took their anti-Tesla hate campaign to a disturbing new extreme—renting a tank to crush a Tesla in a stunt that dangerously normalizes political violence. This hate mirrors a broader wave of hostility toward Elon Musk's company, fueled by leftist NGOs in the U.S., where some attacks on Tesla have already been classified as acts of domestic terrorism.
"Hey @elonmusk wanna see a WW2 veteran run over a Swasticar in a Sherman tank?" Led By Donkeys wrote on Musk's X platform.
TANK vs TESLA
— Led By Donkeys (@ByDonkeys) May 7, 2025
"We've crushed fascism before and we'll crush it again"
- WW2 veteran Ken, 98, in the tank pic.twitter.com/O6NBNWr4scThe crazed activists wrote in a separate X post: "We've crushed fascism before and we'll crush it again"...
Led By Donkeys' anti-Musk talking points are no different from those of far-left Democrats in the U.S. who waged a multi-month color revolution operation to shift public opinion about Musk because of his DOGE involvement but have largely failed. Without USAID funding, Democrats are just treading water.
The latest public records data in the UK shows that Led By Donkeys has four directors: Ben Stewart, James Sadri, Oliver Knowles, and Will Rose.
Forensic analysis of public records reveals a complex web of interconnected companies centered around the directors.
It's not hard to create a profile on the group that calls Tesla vehicles "Swasticar." You can see their hateful political leanings.
Also… surprise, surprise… the WW2 veteran in the video turns out to be an actor impersonating a deceased veteran:
Hey Led By Donkeys, why did you pay an actor to pretend to be this actual WW2 veteran who died in 2020?
— Frasier Payne (@MeinGottNiles) May 9, 2025
Does his family know about this?
Do you feel good about stealing the legacy of a deceased hero for your cheap political theater? https://t.co/cgHDCsew81 pic.twitter.com/mqaJhlSOws -
Site: OnePeterFive
Yesterday, May 8, 2025, the feast of the Apparition of St. Michael in the month of Our Lady, we were given given a new Pope. We mustn’t speak negatively about him or his election. It is natural to be concerned that the hirelings and wolves inside the Church appear ecstatic at his election. We are wounded children still reeling from the scandal and confusion wrought by the last “Holy Father.
-
Site: AsiaNews.itAfter attacking each other in the past couple of days, both sides continue to launch air strikes and drones, with emergency measures imposed along the border. The two countries accuse each other of starting the violence and infiltrating their respective territory. New Delhi has also intensified non-military measures against Islamabad, putting pressure on the International Monetary Fund, as well as blocking parts of the Internet. ...
-
Site: Zero HedgeTrump Calls For 30-Day Cease-Fire In Russia-Ukraine WarTyler Durden Fri, 05/09/2025 - 09:25
Authored by Aldgra Fredly via The Epoch Times,
President Donald Trump on May 8 urged Russia and Ukraine to enter into a 30-day unconditional cease-fire while U.S.-led peace negotiations are ongoing.
Trump stated that the temporary cease-fire must “ultimately build toward a peace agreement” between the two nations and warned that the United States would impose sanctions if the cease-fire wasn’t respected.
“Talks with Russia/Ukraine continue,” he stated in a Truth Social post.
“Hopefully, an acceptable ceasefire will be observed, and both countries will be held accountable for respecting the sanctity of these direct negotiations.”
Trump also said that he would “stay committed” to ending the war in Ukraine, despite his administration officials having previously indicated that the United States may abandon mediation efforts if there are no clear signs of progress toward a peace agreement.
“It can all be done very quickly, and I will be available on a moment’s notice if my services are needed,” the president stated.
“Thousands of young soldiers are dying on a weekly basis, and everybody should want it to STOP. I do, and the United States of America does, also.”
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy told Trump during a May 8 phone call that Ukraine is ready to enter into a temporary cease-fire with Russia and is willing to “engage in talks in any format.”
However, Zelenskyy said that Russia must first demonstrate its readiness to end the war, “starting with a full, unconditional ceasefire.” This would involve ending missile and drone strikes and halting offensive assaults along the front lines.
“Ukraine is ready for a full ceasefire starting right now, from this very moment—a 30-day silence. But it must be real,” he said in a video address.
“Thirty days that could become the beginning of years of peace.”
On April 30, the Kremlin said that Russian President Vladimir Putin remains open to a cease-fire and eventual peaceful settlement to the conflict, but there are still issues need to be resolved.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio has previously warned that the U.S. government may abandon efforts to mediate an end to the three-year-long war if Russia and Ukraine fail to make a peace agreement.
“I think they’re closer in general than they’ve been any time in the last three years but it’s still not there,” Rubio said in an interview with NBC News on April 27.
Rubio said that the United States may opt to take measures against those resisting efforts to end the war, but emphasized that it would “prefer not to get to that stage yet because we think it closes the door to diplomacy.”
The war in Ukraine has been ongoing since Putin sent thousands of troops for a full invasion in February 2022. Putin declared an “Easter truce” with Ukraine on April 19, directing his forces to halt all military operations until midnight of April 20.
Both sides later accused each other of violating the truce. The Russian military eventually resumed the “special military operation” after the truce ended.
On April 28, Putin unilaterally declared a three-day ceasefire from May 8–May 10 to mark the 80th anniversary of victory over Nazi Germany in World War II. Zelenskyy later dismissed the move as yet “another attempt at manipulation” by Russia.
“The cease-fire should not be just for a few days, only to return to killing afterward,” Zelenskyy said in an April 28 address.
“It must be immediate, full, and unconditional, for at least 30 days, to ensure it is secure and guaranteed. This is the foundation that could lead to real diplomacy.”
Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andriy Sybiha alleged that Russia violated the three-day cease-fire 734 times between midnight and midday on May 8, including 464 attacks involving heavy weapons and 176 drone strikes.
The Russian Defense Ministry said that Ukraine, in turn, had carried out 488 attacks on Russian targets and twice tried to break through the border in the Kursk region.
-
Site: southern orders
-
Site: LES FEMMES - THE TRUTH
-
Site: LifeNews
Fr. Denis Wilde, an Augustinian priest who is the associate director of Priests for Life, yesterday recalled a young seminarian he knew in the 1970s at Villanova University as “a humble man who was not into himself, but into the Lord, Jesus Christ.”
That seminarian became Pope Leo XIV, the first American-born pope to lead the Catholic Church.
As a student at Villanova, Robert Prevost was one of the founders of the pro-life organization Villanovans for Life that is still active some 50 years later. Pope Leo’s previous statements about the sanctity of life make it clear he has not changed his mind about the need to protect the unborn from abortion.
Please follow LifeNews on Rumble for the latest pro-life videos.
In a broadcast interview with Priests for Life Executive Director Janet Morana, Fr. Wilde said he was watching the news from Rome when he thought he heard the name “Prevost” announced as the new pope.
“I went into another area and one person was already down on his knees, thanking God,” Fr. Wilde said. “I’m still trying to let this sink in because it’s such a towering, wonderful thing that has taken place.”
Priests for Life National Director Frank Pavone said he is encouraged by Pope Leo’s pro-life passion. In a video to his followers, Pavone said he had written a prayer for the new pontiff’s success, in which he asked God to “Give to the new Pope the joy of proclaiming the Gospel of Life, And of reflecting your truth and love.”
Pavone said “we will learn more about the new pope in the days and weeks to come, and at Priests for Life, we will be praying for him.”
The post Pope Leo XIV Founded the Pro-Life Group When He Went to Villanova appeared first on LifeNews.com.
-
Site: AsiaNews.itThe religious family to which the new pontiff belonged, and which he led as Prior General for 12 years, has a long history of missionary presence on the Asian continent, beginning with the Basilica of Santo Niño in Cebu. Fellow Augustinians in India and Indonesia describe him as "a deeply spiritual man, capable of truly listening." His coat of arms features a phrase from Augustine and the order's emblem: a burning heart pierced by an arrow above a book.
-
Site: Zero HedgeBritish Airways Owner To Order 53 Airbus And Boeing Long-Haul PlanesTyler Durden Fri, 05/09/2025 - 09:05
International Airlines Group (IAG), owner of British Airways and Aer Lingus, will place an order for 53 new Airbus and Boeing long-haul aircraft after reporting strong first-quarter results on Friday.
The company said it will purchase 32 Boeing Co. 787-10 aircraft for British Airways and 21 Airbus SE A330neo planes, which may be assigned to IAG’s airline brands including Aer Lingus, Iberia, and Level.
They are set to be delivered between 2028 to 2033 and are in addition to the 18 planes it ordered in March.
The aircraft are mainly for replacement, with around one third to be used for growth in IAG’s core markets, the company said.
It comes as IAG said its first-quarter 2025 revenue grew 9.6 percent to €7.04 billion, while operating profit increased by €130 million to €198 million, as strong revenue growth and lower fuel prices offset expected cost increases.
Its operating margin also increased to 2.8 percent.
As Katabella Roberts reports for The Epoch Times, IAG credited the strong results to “good operational performance,” particularly at British Airways, while noting that Iberia and Vueling continue to be “amongst the most punctual airlines in the world.”
The British-Spanish company also credited “robust” demand across its North Atlantic routes, which saw 27.8 percent of the total available seat kilometre (ASK) revenue in the first three months to March 2025.
Demand was also strong in Europe (23.3 percent of the total ASK) and Latin America and the Caribbean (22.5 percent) it said.
Spain and the UK were slightly more disappointing with just 8.4 percent of the total ASK.
The results come as plane manufacturers have been battling with supply chain snags and other challenges that have delayed deliveries.
However, IAG said its outlook for the full year remains unchanged, though it acknowledged “geopolitical and macroeconomic uncertainty.”
As of May 6, the company is around 80 percent booked for the second quarter, with revenue ahead of last year, and 29 percent booked for the second half, which it said is broadly in line with last year
Luis Gallego, IAG chief executive officer, said the company’s strong first quarter results “reflect the performance of our businesses and the effectiveness of our strategy and transformation.”
For now, the company remains focused on strengthening its brands across its markets of the North Atlantic, Latin America, and intra-Europe.
“We continue to see resilient demand for air travel across all our markets, particularly in the premium cabins and despite the macroeconomic uncertainty.
“Our commitment to financial strength and shareholder value is reflected in €530 million of share buybacks completed in 2025 so far, alongside a proposed final dividend of €288 million, which brings our total dividend for 2024 to €435 million,” Gallego said.
The announcement comes as Boeing seeks to ramp up production of its best-selling 737 MAX jet to a rate of 38 per month this year, following a turbulent 2024 that saw the plane maker come under scrutiny due to safety issues.
Separately on Thursday, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said the UK will purchase $10 billion of Boeing planes, though the details of that deal remain unclear.
-
Site: PaulCraigRoberts.org
The Digital Revolution Is Too Costly to Continue
Paul Craig Roberts
Malwarebytes is a service that can help you to reduce your cybersecurity risks, but not eliminate them. The Internet will always be vulnerable, because it was developed as an open system.
Malwarebytes reports on two recent new ways cybercriminals can steal your identity.
One results from a problem in Google’s infrastructure that allows cybercriminals to send emails that seem to be from Google. Responding to them can result in identity theft. https://www.malwarebytes.com/blog/news/2025/04/all-gmail-users-at-risk-by-clever-replay-attack?utm_source=iterable&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=b2c_pro_oth_20250428_aprilweeklynewsletter_paid_v4_1_174551916671&utm_content=Gmail
Another operates by exploiting the Zoom video conferencing system to take control of your computer, drain your bank account or do whatever the cybercriminals have in mind. https://www.malwarebytes.com/blog/news/2025/04/zoom-attack-tricks-victims-into-allowing-remote-access-to-install-malware-and-steal-money?utm_source=iterable&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=b2c_pro_oth_20250428_aprilweeklynewsletter_paid_v4_1_174551916671&utm_content=Zoom
It is not only cybercriminals who are after your data. So are commercial services and sellers of products. A suit has been brought against Shopify for installing tracking cookies on customers’ iPhones and using this data to create a profile that can be sold to merchants. If successful, the lawsuit is likely to greatly raise the cost to Internet marketers by dragging them into courtrooms in many jurisdictions. Defending in multiple jurisdictions easily exhausts a company’s capital.
So, just as the vulnerability of the Internet raises the threat level and cost to individuals, it also raises the cost to Internet commerce and service providers.
There needs to be some objective cost/benefit studies of the digital/AI revolution. From observation, I conclude that the costs are sharply rising, and the benefits are declining. Indeed, many claimed benefits, such as students using AI to do their assignments and, thereby, never learning any skills, such as how to write a theme, solve a math or physics problem, in fact create an ignorant population devoid of ability to function independently of technology. They have no ability to even know if the information provided to them by AI is correct. Their minds are totally controlled by whoever programs the software.
The digital revolution has driven up the cost of cars and appliances and made them increasingly frustrating and costly to repair.
The digital revolution has made it extremely costly in terms of time and stress to resolve any service issue problem. Problems that in the analogue age were resolved with a three-minute telephone call answered on the third ring, now can go on for hours and days. A telephone call gets you a robot voice programed to answer questions that you would never call about and to direct you to another robot voice to take your payment or add to your service. It is a struggle to ever get a human, and when you do, it is someone in Asia who you can barely understand and wants your Social Security number in order to tell you that they don’t have the authority to deal with your problem, but they will connect you to a higher up. Sometimes it happens and you reach a higher up, but usually via a return call 24 hours or more later. Sometimes your bank account is frozen, and you can’t get to it when you need it. Your credit card gets compromised, and you have to be issued a new one, which often means you have to re-notify all of your automatic payments you have foolishly been tricked into: “Go Paperless, Save Trees, Save the Cost of Stamps,” and spend a day of your life informing your autopay service providers and merchant accounts of your new credit card number.
Everyone can add to this list, and on top of it all the digital revolution has caused people to cease answering a ringing telephone. About 95 percent of calls are scams. If a person recognizes your number, you might get a call back, and if you recognize the number you might answer. Today a telephone is mainly used for scrolling the internet and watching porn.
The digital revolution does enable us to work from home and to do video conferencing. The fake “Covid pandemic” introduced working from home, but now companies are finding that the absence of interaction with colleagues reduces work performance and creates a sense of isolation that undermines an employee’s association with the firm.
It was possible to audio conference under the old analogue system. What does the visual element add? It appears that it lengthens the meetings, because participants want to be seen dominating the meetings.
The gainers from the digital revolution and AI are the companies as they are able to shift the cost of customer service to their customers and offshore any customer contact with a human customer service representative to Bangladesh.
Corporate executives and boards welcomed the digital revolution. It lowered corporate costs by shifting them to customers and, thereby, raised corporate profits and the “performance bonuses” of executives and board members.
During the era of the digital revolution, cybercriminals have had no problem bypassing current protections by exploiting new vulnerabilities. What, in my experience, cybersecurity firms tell their clients is that the best they can do for them is to train their employees in how to be careful and not be tricked into unintentionally giving access to the company’s records. These training sessions are ongoing as new methods of gaining access to confidential data continue to multiply.
Has the cost of protecting information in the digital age already exceeded the reduction in cost from imposing customer service costs on the customers? If not, it soon will.
What happens then? Do all the people who have been taken for a ride by the digital revolution repudiate it and demand the return of sanity? Or would they be lost and not know what do to with themselves if they couldn’t scroll their cell phone?
The digital revolution and its offspring AI raise a big question. What is to become of humanity? What role do humans have? Apparently a very limited one. I recently read that already there are operations that only machines can provide, humans surgeons being insufficiently quick for the operation to succeed.
So, if surgeons are not needed, who is?
Why did some humans think it was a service to mankind to eliminate human purpose? Confronted with the irrelevancy of people, little wonder that Bill Gates and the World Economic Forum saw the future in terms of reducing the world human population from the current billions down to 500,000 million people. And it is not even clear what these would have as a purpose.
In the movie, “The Graduate,” the line was that the future was plastics. Today in real life the line is that the future is Artificial Intelligence. If so it is a dystopian future, a future we should prevent at all cost. It is a future in which humanity is both irrelevant and unneeded as there is nothing for them to do except for a handful to program the machines. But for whom are the machines programed?
Earlier when I first raised this issue, I said a colleague and I would provide a positive scenario of AI. Here I withdraw my intent, as I am convinced that there is no acceptable human outcome from the digital revolution. It will destroy us as certainly as world nuclear war. Humanity has no greater enemy than the digital revolution, a horror beyond horrors.
Dr. Mathew Maavak raises the question whether the combination of volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity (VUCA) with Artificial Intelligence has given us an existence “that no longer rewards insight, only compliance.” https://www.rt.com/news/616850-ai-end-world-vuca/
Was it the raison d’être of the World Economic Forum to create a new breed of leaders who are more feckless and pliant than their predecessors?
-
Site: PaulCraigRoberts.org
The People Who Created the Digital Revolution Are Enemies of Humanity
Harrods latest retailer to be hit by cyber attack
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c62x4zxe418o
Think of the massive problems, waste of time, theft of resources, theft of identity, inability to reach service suppliers, and compare the hell of life in the digital revolution with the peace, security, low stress life of the analogue era.
Can we please go back
-
Site: PaulCraigRoberts.org
What Goes Around Comes Around
FBI Officially Launches Criminal Investigation Into N.Y. AG Letitia James Over Suspected Mortgage Fraud
The Fulton County, Georgia, prosecutor of Trump also appears to have come to a bad end.
Were these racist prosecutions caused by decades of white liberals teaching blacks to hate white people?
-
Site: PaulCraigRoberts.org
Sooner or Later Nuclear Weapons Will Destroy Life on Earth
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2025/05/michael-snyder/who-is-going-to-use-nuclear-weapons-first/
The India-Pakistan animosity raises the question whether British de-colonization was a bad decision.
-
Site: PaulCraigRoberts.org
The Pharmaceutical Companies Are In It for the Money, Not Health
They don’t mind killing us as long as it makes money.
Merck rigged Gardasil trials to conceal harms, court documents reveal
A forensic analysis—now part of the official court record—lays bare a chilling narrative of clinical trial rigging, regulatory failure, and global deception.
-
Site: PaulCraigRoberts.org
The Democrat Judiciary Has Taken Over the Executive Branch
No border closing as Biden judge orders Trump to resettle 12,000 immigrant-invaders into the US.
I don’t think Trump and Mega Americans understand that they are in a fight to the death that can only be settled by violence. The intent of the Democrats is to destroy America and to replace it with a Sodom & Gomorrah Tower of Babel. It is impossible to compromise with this agenda. It can only be defeated, and that will require violence.
-
Site: Zero HedgeFutures Gain Ahead Of US-China Trade TalksTyler Durden Fri, 05/09/2025 - 08:32
US equity futures traded modestly higher pointing to a third day of gains, until just before 730am ET when Trump decided to play bad cop to Scott Bessent's good cop and posted on Truth Social that "80% Tariff on China seems right!" but then added that the final tariff rate is "Up to Scott B."
That comment promptly hit futures, erasing the market's modest gains, but upon reflection and realization that Trump was probably just in one of his moods, futures resumed their ascent after yesterday’s trade deal with the UK and Trump’s comments to buy the market. The focus is on the start of China trade talks this weekend, but if we use the US/UK deal as a template, it is light on details with a seemingly minimal economic impact. As of 8:00am ET, S&P futures are up 0.2% and Nasdaq futures gain 0.3%. Pre-market, all Mag7 names are higher with cyclicals mixed but with a bias to Quality names. Markets also benefited from a slew of positive earnings, with Microchip Technology, Lyft, and Pinterest surging while Expedia plunged after it cut bookings growth forecasts. Bond yields are flat as the yield curve bull steepens and the USD sells off after its strongest day since Nov 6 (day after the US Pres. Election). In commodities, energy continues to see a bid with WTI now above $60/bbl, Ags are higher, and precious metals are outperforming base. There is nothing on the macro data calendar, and earnings are light today so today’s session will likely be investors trying to position for outcomes after this weekend’s US/China summit.
In premarket trading, most Mag 7 stocks were green (Tesla +0.75%, Apple +0.2%, Amazon +0.03%, Meta +0.8%, Nvidia +0.1%, Alphabet +0.07%, Microsoft +0.03%). Affirm Holdings fell 6% after the buy-now-pay-later company gave a revenue forecast for the current quarter with the midpoint trailing the avearge analyst estimate. Expedia tumbled 9% after the travel services company cut its gross bookings growth forecast for 2025.
- Figs Inc. (FIGS) drops 16% postmarket after the seller of medical scrubs reduced its year outlook for adjusted Ebitda margin.
- Globus Medical (GMED) drops 14% after the medical device company’s earnings missed estimates, with analysts pointing to weakness in its US spine business and the challenges of integrating recent deals.
- Gogo (GOGO) soars 21% after the in-flight broadband company reaffirmed its adjusted Ebitda guidance for the full year.
- Green Dot (GDOT) rises 18% after the payments companyboosted its adjusted earnings per share forecast for the full year.
- HubSpot (HUBS) declines 4% after the software company gave an outlook for adjusted earnings that is weaker than expected and said Brian Halligan resigned as executive chairperson.
- Iovance Biotherapeutics (IOVA) plunges 34% after the biotech’s first-quarter revenue fell short of estimates and the company cut its full-year forecast.
- Lyft (LYFT) jumps 11% after reporting better-than-expected gross bookings in the first quarter, drawing a sharp contrast with the disappointing results issued by its much-larger ride-hailing rival Uber Technologies a day earlier.
- Microchip Technology (MCHP) climbs 11% after the chipmaker reported fourth-quarter results and said the period “marks the bottom of this prolonged industry down cycle.”
- Pinterest (PINS) climbs 12% after its second-quarter revenue guidance came in ahead of estimates at the midpoint.
- Trade Desk (TTD) is up 14% after the ad-tech company’s forecast for second quarter adjusted Ebitda exceeded the average analyst estimate.
- Wolfspeed (WOLF) tumbles 19% after posting quarterly results. Management said the company continues to work closely with lenders on ways to address Wolfspeed’s capital structure.
Investors are focused on the possibility of easing tensions with China, though Trump’s comments on Friday were a reality check to anyone expecting a quick solution. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer are set to begin talks with Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng in Switzerland this weekend, the first public discussions between the world’s two largest economies.
President Trump said an 80% tariff on China "seems right!". He added, however, that it is "up to Scott B", a reference to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent who is due to meet with Chinese government officials this weekend to try to deescalate the trade tensions. Raising the 80% level clearly puts Bessent under pressure not to ease the 145% tariff level too far. It's not clear how China would react to that proposal as it's a level that still effectively impedes trade between the two countries, and there's a risk China would walk away from the talks. One potential way out could be the agreement between the UK and US, which maintained the headline 10% on UK imports to the US but added key exemptions for critical sectors including cars and steel.
In Europe, the Stoxx 600 index rose 0.5%, on track for a fourth weekly advance, led by energy and basic resources while Germany’s DAX Index became the first major European gauge to surpass its March record high, recouping all losses sparked by Trump’s trade war, and rising as much as 0.8% to 23,528.88, exceeding the previous record set on March 18. Here are the biggest movers Friday:
- Bavarian Nordic shares jump as much as 14%, the most since August, after the vaccine maker reported first-quarter revenue that beat expectations and kept its 2025 financial outlook
- EDP rises as much as 6.3% in Lisbon after reporting net income for the first quarter that beat the average analyst estimate
- Enel shares gain as much as 2.2% after the Italian utility reported a solid set of results, with first-quarter adjusted net income beating estimates
- Mol rose as much as 1.6% after first-quarter earnings beat estimates, though analysts at Citigroup noted the effect of one-off items and key risks for the next quarter’s outlook
- Sonova shares surge as much as 6.9% after the Swiss hearing aid company reported a sales and margin beat, overshadowing the impact of currency headwinds on its outlook
- BE Semiconductor shares rise as much as 3.6% after JPMorgan initiates coverage with an overweight rating, saying the chip-equipment company is bound for substantial revenue growth if adoption of the hybrid bonding technology takes off in 2026 and 2027
- IAG shares rise as much as 2.7% after fluctuating in early trading. The British Airways owner reported first-quarter results that exceeded expectations, but also noted various cost headwinds and some softness in the US economy
- Cellnex shares fall as much as 5.2% after the tower operator reported revenue and free cash flow that missed estimates
- Campari shares fall as much as 4.6% after the Italian spirits maker’s first-quarter results missed expectations, showing that the backdrop continues to be tough with analysts flagging an uncertain outlook due to trade tensions
- Logista shares declined as much as 7.2% as the Spanish company reported net income for the first half that fell 5.4% from a year earlier and said it sees FY adjusted operating profit excluding the impact on inventory values as “slightly below” 2024 levels.
Earlier in the session, Asia's MSCI’s benchmark gauge rose 0.7%, putting it line for a fourth straight week of gains with Taiwan and Japan leading gains in the region. TSMC, Alibaba and Mitsubishi UFJ were the biggest boosts to the Asia gauge, which is on course to cap its fourth week of advance. Shares got a boost after a trade agreement between the US and UK spurred hopes for similar deals to rollback high tariffs for other US allies. The Taiwanese stock index climbed 1.8% on Friday, taking gains from an April 9 low to over 20%. Chinese equities edged lower as investors reassess bets before trade talks the weekend. President Donald Trump has said he may consider cutting punishing tariffs on Chinese imports if the talks go well. Meanwhile, Indian stocks and bonds extended their slide as hostilities with Pakistan escalated.
In FX, the Bloomberg Dollar spot index falls 0.2%, erasing a similar move higher to snap a two-day winning streak; despite its fall, the greenback is on track for its biggest weekly gain in six weeks. NZD is the weakest performer in G-10 FX, JPY and SEK outperform. “The positive risk sentiment from the UK/US trade framework may face a reality check this weekend in Switzerland. If the first talks between China and US do not give a hint of an off ramp from sky-high tariffs, USD will likely resume its decline,” said Eugenia Fabon Victorino, a head of Asia strategy at Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB
In rates, the 10-year Treasury yield was flat at 4.38%, while the two-year yield slipped 1bp to 3.86% as the Treasury curve bull steepens as front-end yields drop and the long end holds steady. In Europe, Bunds bear steepen, with long-end yields up nearly 5bps; the UK gilt curve also bear steepens, with 2s10s widening ~4.3bps as longer yields lead the move higher.
In commodities, oil futures advance again as WTI drifts 1.5% higher to trade near $60.78. Most base metals trade in the green; LME lead rises 1.5%, outperforming peers. Spot gold rises roughly $22 to trade near $3,328/oz.
There are no macro events on today's calendar but we have a busy Fed speaker slate which includes Kugler (7:45am), Williams (8:30am, 9:15am and 11:30am), Barkin (8:30am), Goolsbee (10am), Waller (11:30am panel with Williams) and Musalem, Hammack and Cook (7:45pm panel).
Market Snapshot
- S&P 500 mini +0.2%
- Nasdaq 100 mini +0.3%
- Russell 2000 mini -0.1%
- Stoxx Europe 600 +0.4%
- DAX +0.6%
- CAC 40 +0.6%
- 10-year Treasury yield little changed at 4.37%
- VIX -0.1 points at 22.4
- Bloomberg Dollar Index -0.2% at 1227.78
- euro +0.2% at $1.1253
- WTI crude +1.3% at $60.85/barrel
Top Overnight News
- Chinese officials have grown “alarmed” in private about the impact to the domestic economy from Trump’s trade war, which is why they were eager to engage with the US. RTRS
- Trump says on his Truth Social account that 80% tariff on China "seems right" ahead of weekend trade talks
- The US hopes to cut its China tariffs to less than 60% if trade talks go well this weekend, people familiar said, in an attempt to de-escalate tensions. Donald Trump signaled tariffs may fall but a spokesman said talk of “targets” was speculation. BBG
- Trump said on his Truth Social account that he is OK if Republcans increase taxes on the rich, although they should probably not do it.
- House Leaders will warn Trump that some of the White House’s tax ambitions will need to be dialed back as Republicans struggle to agree on spending cuts. Politico
- US President Trump posted on Truth that he spoke with Commerce Secretary Lutnick and agreed the “Digital Equity Act” is unconstitutional, which he is ending immediately and there will be no more woke handouts based on race, saving taxpayers billions of dollars.
- Chinese exporters are preparing for a resumption of shipments to the US (part of this preparation involves reserving shipping capacity) in anticipation of both sides dialing back tariffs. RTRS
- China’s trade numbers for April come in ahead of expectations overall, including exports (+8.1% vs. the Street +2%) and imports (-0.2% vs. the Street -0.6%), but exports to the US plunged 21%. WSJ
- Big countries are the focus for future trade deals, especially from Asia, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told Fox. But he said Japan, South Korea and India would require enormous time and effort. BBG
- Silicon Valley wants to disrupt the defense industry — and the Pentagon’s $1 trillion budget. Palantir and Anduril are key players developing autonomous weapons systems that aim to reimagine modern warfare and the companies that dominate it. BBG
- Republicans in Congress are opposed to Trump’s “most favored nation” idea for Medicaid drug purchases (a positive for the industry), although the reconciliation could eliminate a tax deduction for pharma advertising. BBG
- Stablecoin legislation fails to advance in the Senate after Dems blocked the initiative due to opposition over how the Trump family was capitalizing on the crypto industry. NYT
Tariffs/Trade
- US Commerce Secretary Lutnick said deals will be used as templates for other deals and that they will have dozens of deals announced by July 8th. Lutnick stated that as you get to bigger economies and more work, it takes time and economies such as India, Japan and South Korea are huge and take a lot of work, while he added that de-escalation with China is US Treasury Secretary Bessent's goal in talks and that as countries open their markets, the best any country can do is a 10% tariff.
- Detroit Three trade group said the Trump trade deal with the UK "hurts American automakers, suppliers and auto workers".
- China's Vice Foreign Minister Hua said the US cannot sustain what it is doing in trade policy and that China has full confidence in its ability to manage US trade issues. Hua added that China does not want a war of any kind with any other country and has full capability to overcome difficulties amid the trade war, as well as noted that ordinary people in China do not want a trade war but are confident and said they have no fear if they have to face up to reality regarding trade talks.
- China signed a letter of intent with exporters in Argentina to buy about USD 900mln of soybeans, corn and vegetable oil - in turn shifting from the US, according to Bloomberg.
A more detailed look at global markets courtesy of Newsquawk
APAC stocks traded with a positive bias as the region took impetus from the gains stateside, where sentiment was underpinned by trade optimism following the announcement of a UK-US trade agreement framework and President Trump's rhetoric regarding China tariffs. ASX 200 gained as outperformance in tech, financials and energy more than atoned for the slack in mining stocks, while earnings also provided a tailwind after an increase in profits for Macquarie Group. Nikkei 225 returned to above the USD 37,000 level for the first time since late March with the index propelled by recent currency weakness, while the data was mixed as Household Spending topped forecasts but Labour Cash earnings softened. Hang Seng and Shanghai Comp were cautious amid the latest Chinese trade data which topped forecast but showed a slowdown in export growth, although downside was limited ahead of US-China talks on Saturday and after recent comments from President Trump who expects tariffs to go down, while the US was also reportedly weighing a plan to slash China tariffs to as low as 50% as soon as next week.
Top Asian News
- China's Vice Foreign Minister Hua said the US cannot sustain what it is doing in trade policy and that China has full confidence in its ability to manage US trade issues. Hua added that China does not want a war of any kind with any other country and has full capability to overcome difficulties amid the trade war, as well as noted that ordinary people in China do not want a trade war but are confident and said they have no fear if they have to face up to reality regarding trade talks.
- China signed a letter of intent with exporters in Argentina to buy about USD 900mln of soybeans, corn and vegetable oil - in turn shifting from the US, according to Bloomberg.
European bourses (STOXX 600 +0.4%) opened modestly firmer across the board, and have traded sideways throughout the morning thus far. European sectors hold a positive bias; there is some clear outperformance in Energy, while other sectoral gainers are relatively similar in magnitude. Travel & Leisure and Media sit at the foot of the pile – holding modest losses.
Top European News
- Morgan Stanley now expect the BoE to hold rates in June (prev. forecast 25bps cut); now expects rate cut in December, maintains year-end Bank Rate forecast at 3.25%.
- BoE's Bailey says commitment to the 2% inflation target is unwavering. Scenarios have helped us not only to explore what would happen in case a particular shock, or constellation of shocks, should hit the economy, but also how any given set of shocks could affect the economy and inflation depending on the strengths of different economic mechanisms. Good there is a diversity of view on the MPC. UK-US trade deal will leave effective tariff rate higher than they were when they started.
- ECB's Simkus says geopolitics since the start of the year is bad news for the economy, via Bloomberg TV; there is downward pressure on inflation Euro-area inflation depends on EU retaliation to the US. ECB June projections may be a little bit worse. June ECB rate cut is needed. It is unclear if a post-June rate cut will be in July or September. "We are more or less there on inflation". There is no central scenario for ECB rates. "Quite high chances we'll be undershooting on inflation".
- ECB's Rehn says disinflation is on track, and the growth outlook is weakening.
- New German Economy Minister Reiche says "we need a combination of renewable energies and gas, we tended to focus almost too much in climate protection".
- German Chancellor Merz says will not change previous German government's position of joint EU debt. Mutual debt "must remain exceptional", cannot be used for every crisis.
FX
- The recent recovery in the USD has paused for breath with the greenback having gained in the past two sessions on account of the post-FOMC reaction and ongoing trade optimism. On the latter, Thursday saw the unveiling of a UK-US trade agreement. However, of greater importance was Thursday's remarks from US President Trump that tariffs on China can't get any higher than 145% and knows they will be coming down. This was followed up by a report in the New York Post that the US is weighing a plan to slash China tariffs to as low as 50% as soon as next week. Today sees a busy Fed speaker slate with Barr, Kugler, Perli, Williams, Goolsbee & Waller all due on deck. DXY currently trading around 100.40.
- EUR/USD is a touch firmer after being weighed on in the past two sessions amid ongoing trade optimism. This is a reversal of the pattern we saw in April as trade tensions ratcheted higher and the EUR benefitted as a liquid alternative to the Greenback. EZ docket is lacking and ECB speak thus far has proved non-incremental with ECB's Simkus noting ECB June projections may be a little bit worse and a cut next month is needed. EUR/USD briefly slipped onto a 1.11 handle overnight with a low at 1.1197.
- JPY is attempting to claw back some of its recent losses vs. the USD which has seen USD/JPY pick up from a WTD low on Tuesday at 142.35 to a 146.18 peak. Japanese-specific newsflow remains on the light side as market participants await progress on the trade front between Japan and the US. USD/JPY has returned to a 145 handle with a session low at 145.08.
- GBP was unable to benefit vs. the USD and only marginally gained vs. the EUR despite a "hawkish cut from the BoE and news of a UK-US trade agreement. Overnight, Cable hit a new low for the week at 1.3213, whilst EUR/GBP is contained within Thursday's 0.8457-0.8523 range; lower bound of which coincides with the 50DMA. Commentary from BoE's Bailey today proved to be a non-event; the Governor highlighted the unwavering commitment to the 2% target.
- Antipodeans have been choppy after the recent dollar strength and as participants digested the latest Chinese trade data, while Westpac adjusted its RBNZ call and now sees two 25bps rate cuts by July instead of its prior view for just one cut.
- PBoC injected CNY 77bln via 7-day reverse repos with the rate at 1.40% for a net weekly drain of CNY 781.7bln, which was the most in two months.
Fixed Income
- USTs are essentially unchanged as newsflow since Thursday’s flurry of trade updates, which weighed on the benchmark into/after settlement, has been a little lighter. USTs at the bottom-end of a 110-25 to 110-30 band and by extension towards Thursday’s 110-24 base. We await anything fresh on the trade front and confirmation/rebuttal from the administration on the piece in the NY Post (and other vendors since) that China tariffs could be cut to as low as 50% next week. Today's docket is light on the data front but will see a slew of Fed speakers throughout the day.
- Lower by 70 ticks at worst as Bunds, and EGBs broadly, react in full to Thursday’s trade developments, developments that are providing some modest support to the European risk tone this morning. European-specific tariff/trade updates have been light aside from commentary from German Chancellor Merz who said that Trump agreed with him in a phone call on the need to resolve the trade situation quickly. Currently holding just off today’s 130.38 WTD low.
- Gilts are in-fitting with Bunds but with the pressure of an even greater magnitude as the UK benchmark had more of the trade developments to catch up on. Lower by 78 ticks at most to a 92.07 base; support at the figure and then 91.96 from late April and 91.59 from early April. Bailey this morning didn’t add much for specific policy, discussing scenario analysis and similar points in the context of the BoE’s forecasting process. Potentially more pertinently, Chief Economist Pill is due and will hopefully provide insight into his dissent.
Commodities
- Crude futures edge higher in early European morning amid the ongoing trade optimism heading into this weekend's US-Sino trade talks in Switzerland. Elsewhere, US President Trump said they are trying to work on Iran without getting into bombing, while it was separately reported that US President Trump had a private meeting with Israeli PM Netanyahu's advisor ahead of his Middle East trip, according to Axios. WTI Jun trades near session highs between USD 59.89-60.74/bbl while Brent Jul resides in a USD 62.84-63.65/bbl parameter.
- Modest gains across the precious metals complex, underpinned by the current intraday weakness of the Dollar. Spot gold initially dipped beneath the prior day's lows before recovering to above the USD 3,300/oz level. Currently in a USD 3,274.81-3,332.35/oz range at the time of writing.
- Copper futures, in APAC hours, extended on mid-week pullback with selling exacerbated as Chinese markets got underway and with the PBoC's open market operations resulting in the largest weekly net drain in two months, while participants also reflected on the latest Chinese trade data. Copper futures saw a brief spike higher in European trade, albeit in the absence of pertinent newsflow. The move swiftly pared back shortly after. 3M LME copper resides in a USD 9,342.00-9,465.55/t range.
- Iran's oil minister has ordered resumption of exploratory drilling in the Caspian Sea, via Shana.
- China's MOFCOM is to tighten export controls on Gallium, to prevent the smuggling and export of strategic minerals.
- Russia's Deputy Foreign Minister says cannot confirm whether Russia and US are discussing the resumption of gas supplies to Europe, via Ifax.
Russia-Ukraine
- US President Trump posted on Truth that talks with Russia and Ukraine continue, while he called for a 30-day unconditional ceasefire and said that hopefully, an acceptable ceasefire will be observed, and both countries will be held accountable for respecting the sanctity of these direct negotiations. Furthermore, he warned if a ceasefire is not respected, the US and its partners will impose further sanctions.
- Ukrainian President Zelensky said Ukraine is ready for an immediate 30-day ceasefire and that a 30-day ceasefire will be a real indicator of movement towards peace.
- Ukrainian official said Russia struck eight settlements in the Zaporizhzhia region with drones and artillery 220 times during the ceasefire.
- UK PM Starmer is to announce the largest ever sanctions package targeting shadow fleet as UK ramps up pressure on Russia, according to the UK government.
OTHER
- North Korea said it tested a Hwasong-11 missile and multiple launch rockets on Thursday and the test was conducted under the nuclear weapons defence system, while North Korean leader Kim stressed the combat readiness of nuclear forces, according to KCNA.
- China and Russia's joint statement vowed to strengthen cooperation to safeguard the authority of international law and they both strongly opposed unilateral sanctions and long-arm jurisdiction, while they also opposed the practice of double standards or imposition by some states of their will on other states.
US Event Calendar
- Nothing scheduled
Central Bank Speakers
- 5:55 am: Fed’s Barr Gives Speech on AI and the Labor Market
- 6:45 am: Fed’s Kugler Gives Speech on Maximum Employment
- 7:45 am: Fed’s Kugler Appears on Bloomberg TV
- 8:30 am: Fed’s Williams Gives Keynote Address in Reykjavik
- 8:30 am: Fed’s Barkin to Take Part in Fireside Chat in Virginia
- 9:15 am: Fed’s Williams Appears on Bloomberg TV
- 10:00 am: Fed’s Goolsbee Gives Remarks at Fed Listens Event
- 11:30 am: Fed’s Williams, Waller on Panel at Hoover
- May 10 7:45 pm: Fed’s Musalem, Hammack, Cook on Panel at Hoover
DB's Jim Reid concludes the overnight wrap
The most important words yesterday seemed to be Trump's comments when talking about Congress passing his tax bill. He said "If that happens, on top of all of these trade deals that we're doing, this country will hit a point - you better go out and buy stocks now". On cue, the market bought stocks and extended a rally that began 30 minutes earlier amid the announcement of a US-UK trade deal and Trump’s more conciliatory comments towards China. The rally lost some of its luster late on after reporting that Trump is pushing for a tax hike on very high earners with the S&P 500 (+0.58%) closing 1pp below its intra-days highs, while 2 and 10yr USTs spiked +9.7bps and +10.9bps on the day respectively. So as per usual, there is a lot going on at the moment ahead of the weekend US/China trade talks in Geneva.
The US-UK trade deal stuck to the 10% initial tariff baseline but with carve outs from even higher tariffs for certain sectors like autos (now 10% tariff rate) and steel (0% tariff rate), which would bring the effective tariff rate to slightly below 10%. While details are still being ironed out, in return, the UK has agreed to fast track American goods through customs, purchase $10bn worth of Boeing planes, and lower barriers to American agricultural, chemical, and energy exports. The deal still puts the UK in a worse position than it was before Liberation Day even with Prime Minister Starmer touting it as a “historic victory” between the two countries. The FTSE (-0.32%) hardly moved in the closing 30 mins after the deal was announced with Sterling falling -0.35% on the announcement, giving up earlier gains after the hawkish BoE cut.
This framework agreement is interesting considering the UK is not running a big trade deficit with the US nor was it facing much higher tariffs post Liberation Day anyway. As the first agreement with any country since Trump’s reciprocal tariff announcement, it previews what other “deals” might look like. Other countries may seek to replicate the UK’s exemptions from sectoral tariffs, and accept 10% minimum tariffs in return for US concessions. However, this may be on the optimistic end of outcomes and there is some concern that countries that saw larger reciprocal tariffs announced on April 2 (e.g., Japan and Korea) seem to be making limited progress in trade negotiations. Trump even said at his press conference yesterday that the 10% with the UK is a “low number” and that “others will be higher.”
Probably more important for markets than the UK “deal” itself were Trump’s comments on China, saying that he expects “substantive” talks that could then yield tariff cuts. This comes ahead of Treasury Secretary Bessent’s planned talks with Chinese trade officials in Switzerland this weekend, so we will be keeping our eyes peeled.
These various comments from Trump at the White House saw the S&P 500 move from flattish on the day to around +1.5% higher. But it then fell back to +0.58% by the close as Bloomberg reported that Trump is pushing Congressional Republicans to create a new 39.6% tax bracket for individuals earning at least $2.5m, as a means to offset other tax cuts. Still, it was a positive day overall for equities, with cyclical stocks outperforming and the small cap Russell 2000 rising +1.85%. Other risk assets also gained, with Bitcoin (+6.02%) spiking above the $100,000 level for the first time since early February.
By contrast Treasuries sold off, with 2yr yields (+9.7bps) rising to their highest level in four weeks at 3.88%, while 10yr yields rose +10.9bps to 4.38%. Also contributing to the bond sell off was a slightly weak 30yr auction that followed a strong 10yr auction the previous day. The combination of higher US yields and stronger US risk assets saw the dollar index (+1.03%) post its best day since November 6, the day after Trump’s election win. This morning in Asia, 2yr ( -1.2bps) and 10yr USTs (-2.0bps) yields are reversing a little of yesterday's move.
The drama of the trade deal rather overshadowed the BOE’s rate cut decision yesterday, which saw more hawkish messaging than markets expected. Although the BOE cut interest rates by a quarter point to 4.25% as DB expected, the vote split went three ways, with five members voting for a 25bp cut, two voting for a 50bps cut, and two voting for no change to the bank rate. The last bit was the surprising element. Overall, BOE governor Bailey said there was a need for a “gradual and careful” approach, citing tariff shocks as a factor to both higher inflation and a weaker growth outlook.
Two-year gilts (+12.2bps to 3.93%) and the pound both rose in response (before the pound fell later after the trade deal) as investors priced in the hawkish undertones. DB retains its call for three more rate cuts this year, with one more rate cut in early 2026 leading to a terminal rate of 3.25%. See our UK economist’s takeaways here. In other Central Bank news, Norway and Sweden both left their policy rate unchanged as expected.
Elsewhere in European markets, the STOXX 600 (+0.40%) moved higher, with the DAX (+1.02%), CAC 40 (+0.89%) and FTSE MIB (+1.71%) all posting strong gains. Beyond the general risk-on tone, this rally was supported by solid data, including stronger-than-expected German industrial production for March (+3.0% mom vs +1.0% expected). Eurozone bonds saw a more moderate sell off than the US and UK, with 10yr bund yields +5.9bps higher to 2.53%, while OATs (+4.3bps) and BTPs (+3.4bps) outperformed. The narrowing in sovereign spreads saw the 10yr BTP-Bund spread fall to 105bps, its lowest level since October 2021.
The risk-on mood was also visible in the commodity space, with Brent crude oil rising +2.81% to $62.84/bbl, also supported by EIA data showing consecutive weekly declines in US crude inventories for the first time since January. By contrast, gold (-1.75%) fell for a second day running after reaching an all-time high on Monday.
Turning to US data, yesterday saw the weekly initial jobless claims decline 13k to 228k (vs 230k estimates) for the week ending in May 2, erasing what appeared to be an Easter-driven spike the previous week. So that was another sign that the labour market is still “solid” despite the tariffs. Meanwhile, the NY Fed’s consumer survey saw 1yr ahead inflation expectations stable at 3.6%, but with 3yr ahead expectations rising 0.2pp to 3.2%, their highest since July 2022, marking the latest in a string of survey data pointing towards pro-inflationary risks.
Asian equity markets are mostly stronger this morning but with Chinese risk subdued. The Nikkei (+1.43%) is leading the gains, with the Topix (+1.31%) also rising, marking its 11th consecutive day of increases, the longest streak since October 2017. The S&P/ASX 200 (+0.58%) is also higher. Chinese stocks are lagging, with the CSI (-0.23%) and the Shanghai Composite (-0.26%) both declining, while the Hang Seng (-0.01%) is flat after reversing its initial gains. The KOSPI (+0.01%) is struggling to gain momentum following comments from Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, who suggested that trade agreements with South Korea may require significantly more time. S&P (+0.11%) and NASDAQ 100 (+0.16%) futures are both showing small increases.
Early morning data revealed that China's exports demonstrated resilience in April, growing by +8.1% year-on-year, surpassing the expected +2.0%, thus defying predictions that the trade war with the US would begin to have a detrimental impact. However, this growth represents a slowdown from the +12.4% increase recorded in March. Exports to the US fell -21% so the beat reflected increased trade with the rest of Asia and Europe.
Meanwhile, imports contracted by -0.2% year-on-year last month, compared to the anticipated -6.0%, but still marking the third consecutive month of declines. The trade surplus decreased to $96.18 billion from $102.64 billion in March, falling short of the projected $93.09 billion.
To the day ahead now, data releases to expect include Italy’s March industrial production, Canada’s April Jobs report, and Norway’s April CPI. Earnings include Recruit Holdings, Commerzbank and Cellnex.
-
Site: PaulCraigRoberts.org
US History Into the Memory Hole as “artists” Turn America into a Black Nation
-
Site: PaulCraigRoberts.org
How Racism against Whites was legitimized by Marxist Multiculturalism
-
Site: southern orders
Below is what I wrote on a post on April 29th. I think it wise repost it as we reflect on the theological orientation of Pope Leo XIV.But first, let me remind you about my clairvoyance on Thursday, the day of our Pope’s election. I predicted the election would take place that day and I touted that it is the feast day of Our Lady of the Rosary of Pompeii. I also touted that it was the feast day of the Apparitions of St. Michael the Archangel. I wondered if the pope would choose Michael as his papal name. I got that wrong.
But guess who didn’t get it wrong and has more clairvoyance than me! Marc who comments here and I have known since I baptized him several years ago at St. Joseph Church in Macon. He declared in a comment that he thought the new pope would take the name “LEO”! Of course that would be Leo XIV!
I ASK MARC, WHAT MADE YOU OFFER THAT CLAIRVOYANT THOUGHT?
I might add, that while I got the pope’s name wrong, the chosen name, I also posted the Prayer to Saint Michael the Archangel which Pope Leo XIII penned! You can’t make this stuff up!
Pope Leo, while way ahead of me in intellect, academic abilities and graduate school learning, went to a liberal seminary in Chicago around the same time I was at a liberal seminary in Baltimore in the late 1970’s.
I am slightly older than he by about two years. Thus our experience of the pre-Vatican II Church and the immediate post-Vatican II Church is similar.
While still embracing the orthodoxy of Vatican II he seems to have come to appreciate law and order in the Church. He is a mathematician as well as a Doctor of Canon law. He wants precision in theology and doctrine while pursuing Social Justice as articulated by Pope Leo XIII and while promoting a synodal Church proposed by Pope Francis. He is an orthodox Catholic while liberal/progressive in the eyes of the world, in terms of politics, when it comes to immigration, social justice and peace. But he is orthodox as a Catholic in embracing progressive social justice needs of people created in the image and likeness of God.
Here is my post of April 29 on orthodoxy and heterodoxy:
While I alternate between the use of the terms conservative and liberal for Church matters, I do think it is better to best to use orthodox and heterodox to describe the polarization in the Church that has existed since Vatican II and on steroids today because of the pontificate of the late Pope Francis, RIP.
Orthodoxy and heterodoxy give religious and theological significance to these two groups.
For example, a papal candidate who embraces the social teachings of the Church that go back to the 1800’s (Pope Leo XIII!) is orthodox but in political terms would be seen as liberal or progressive. Orthodox Catholics must be careful about criticizing any Catholic who takes seriously the Church’s social teachings (especially those taught by Pope Leo XIII!) which are in fact, in political terms, progressive or liberal. These are orthodox.
Heterodox papal candidates who want to ordain women, active gays and so-called transgendered people and start processes of blessing LGBTQ couples, triads or polygamists, which will lead to accepting these as “sacramental marriages” are progressive and liberal in the political sense but clearly heterodox if not heretical in Catholic parlance.
A papal candidate that forgoes the tradition of papal trappings can be very orthodox but appear as a liberal or progressive when if fact they aren’t.
Thus so-called traditional Catholics should be very careful about seeing papal candidates through a political lens. One can be very pastoral and have an outreach to those most in need of salvation here and now and also in the hereafter but be very orthodox.
The heterodox don’t care about the salvation of souls, only embracing the sinner and the sin.
The heterodox don’t love sinners and can’t differentiate between the sin and the sinner. They might be traditional and conservative but they are still heterodox.
-
Site: Rorate CaeliSource: Conclave Life, Corriere della Sera, May 1st, 2025.Excerpt, for the record of current events:"... "American Robert Francis Prevost, 69, who, on the other hand, is an elector and is entering Cardinal Burke's home for a top secret summit, deflects: 'I have not yet thought about what to pack, even though there is one week to go until extra omnes, however, excuse me, we were told not to New Catholichttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04118576661605931910noreply@blogger.com
-
Site: Zero HedgeTrump Appoints Judge Jeanine Pirro As Interim US Attorney For DCTyler Durden Fri, 05/09/2025 - 08:10
Authored by Joseph Lord via The Epoch Times,
President Donald Trump announced on May 8 that Judge Jeanine Pirro, best known for her role as a Fox News commentator, had been tapped to serve as interim U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, one of the most influential prosecutorial positions in the country.
“I am pleased to announce that Judge Jeanine Pirro will be appointed interim United States Attorney for the District of Columbia,” Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social.
“Jeanine is incredibly well qualified for this position, and is considered one of the Top District Attorneys in the History of the State of New York. She is in a class by herself. Congratulations Jeanine!”
The U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia is uniquely influential, as the post entails oversight of both federal and local D.C. code. It handles cases ranging from homicide to political corruption to federal fraud violations.
The announcement came after Trump withdrew the nomination of his previous pick for the job, attorney Ed Martin. That decision came after Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) announced he wouldn’t support Martin’s confirmation, making it unlikely he could be approved by the Senate.
The announcement came after Trump withdrew the nomination of his previous pick for the job, acting U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Ed Martin, due to insurmountable opposition in the Senate. Appointed in January, Martin’s term in the role expires on May 20, and he would need Senate confirmation by then to take up the post in a full capacity.
Trump cited Pirro’s extensive legal background in his post announcing her nomination.
“Jeanine was Assistant District Attorney for Westchester County, New York, and then went on to serve as County Judge, and District Attorney, where she was the first woman ever to be elected to those positions. During her time in office, Jeanine was a powerful crusader for victims of crime. Her establishment of the Domestic Violence Bureau in her Prosecutor’s Office was the first in the Nation.”
“She excelled in all ways,” Trump said.
Pirro previously hosted the show “Justice with Judge Jeanine” on Fox News for ten years. She is currently a co-host of “The Five,” also on Fox News.
She’s become known for her tough-on-crime attitude toward law enforcement, often speaking critically of policies on violent crime, which aligns with Trump’s plans to reduce crime in the nation’s capital.
If confirmed by the Senate, Pirro would instantly become one of the most powerful and important prosecutors in the country, rivaled only by the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, which includes Manhattan.
It remains to be seen whether the Senate will be more amenable to Pirro’s nomination than they were to Martin’s.
Without Senate confirmation, the choice of a permanent replacement will fall to a panel of federal judges on the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, led by Chief Judge James Boasberg.
Tillis tied this opposition to Martin’s legal work and advocacy related to Jan. 6 defendants arrested under President Joe Biden’s administration.
“If Mr. Martin were being put forward for any district except the district where Jan. 6 happened—the protest happened, I’d probably support him, but not in this district,” Tillis told reporters on Tuesday.
Martin, known for representing defendants charged in the Jan. 6, 2021, breach of the U.S. Capitol, defended his past advocacy in a meeting with Tillis on Monday evening. While the senator said Martin “did a good job” of explaining that some individuals were “over prosecuted,” he said “there were some—two or three hundred of them—that should have never gotten a pardon.”
The senator said he believes that anyone who breached the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, should serve prison time.
“Whether it’s 30 days or three years is debatable,” he said, “but I have no tolerance for anybody who entered the building—and that’s probably where most of the friction was.”
In lieu of the position, Trump announced that he would be appointing Martin to several roles at the Department of Justice where he would oversee investigations into alleged weaponization of law enforcement against conservatives under the Biden administration.
“Ed Martin has done an AMAZING job as interim U.S. Attorney, and will be moving to the Department of Justice as the new Director of the Weaponization Working Group, Associate Deputy Attorney General, and Pardon Attorney,” Trump said in a post on Truth Social.
“In these highly important roles, Ed will make sure we finally investigate the Weaponization of our Government under the Biden Regime, and provide much needed Justice for its victims. Congratulations Ed!”
-
Site: Rorate CaeliFor traditional Catholics and all Catholics interested in adding their names and prayers to the spiritual bouquet organized by the Latin Mass Society of England and Wales: please click here.New Catholichttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04118576661605931910noreply@blogger.com
-
Site: Fr. Z's BlogOne of the thing that a new Pope has to do, is tie up the loose ends left by his predecessor. There are no ends looser that one can imagine that the DUBIA about Amoris laetitia submitted in 2016 to … Read More →
-
Site: southern ordersPope Leo chants his first Mass in Latin! He has a nice chanting voice and even chants the Sign of the Cross and Greeting! He has very nice vestments, a nice alb and miter. He uses a very nice pastoral staff, perhaps the one Pope Benedict used?I hope he gets more papal looking shoes though. If he doesn’t use the bright red type of Pope Benedict, perhaps the more maroon shoes of St. Pope John Paul II.I am disappointed that the faux altar was placed in front of the magnificent original altar of the Sistine Chapel and no crucifix facing the pope on the faux altar with rinky-dink candles and candlesticks.As Pope Leo enters and exits the Sistine Chapel, His Holiness blesses those rather than waving or ignoring those in the congregation! Praise God!Pope Leo introduces the Penitential Rite reading exactly what is in the Latin Modern Roman Missal. There is no vain and secular chattiness or welcoming or mini homily, praised by Jesus Christ! The Confiteor is used.Praise God, Pope Leo chants the introduction to the Gloria in Latin!!!! He does not chant the Collect, though!Unfortunately, His Holiness does not use the Roman Canon, but rather Eucharistic Prayer III but in Latin.The first video is a synopsis of Pope Leo's first Mass as Supreme Pontiff with the Conclave Cardinals in the Sistine Chapel. The Second is the full Mass. Below both videos is the summary of Pope Leo's homily by Vatican News:
Pope Leo XIV to Cardinals: 'We are to bear witness to our joyful faith in Christ'
The morning after being elected the 267th Pope, Pope Leo XIV celebrates Mass with the Cardinal electors in the Sistine Chapel, reminding them that "we are to bear witness to our joyful faith in Christ" while warning that where faith is lacking, life loses meaning.By Deborah Castellano Lubov
"We are called to bear witness to our joyful faith in Christ the Saviour..."
Pope Leo XIV gave this heartfelt reminder during his first Mass as Pope on Friday, 9 May 2025, with the Cardinal electors and other Cardinals present in Rome, in the Sistine Chapel, the exact site where the electors, with at least a two-thirds majority, elected him as the 267th Pope on the fourth ballot on Thursday afternoon.
In his homily, the new Pope called for always better cultivating a personal relationship with Christ; and he insisted that, without faith, life lacks meaning.
However, the new US-born Pope began with a few words in English, in which he thanked the Cardinal electors for their trust in him.
"I want to repeat the words from the Responsorial Psalm: 'I will sing a new song to the Lord, because He has done marvels,' and indeed, not just with me but with all of us.
"My brother Cardinals, as we celebrate this morning," he encouraged them, "I invite you to reflect on the marvels the Lord has done, the blessings that the Lord continues to pour out on all of us through the Ministry of Peter.
"You have called me to carry that cross, and to carry out that mission, and I know I can rely on each and every one of you to walk with me, as we continue as a Church, as a community of friends of Jesus, as believers, to announce the Good News, to announce the Gospel," he said.
Christ showed us human holiness
Pope Leo's homily, which he then pronounced in Italian, was centered on St. Peter, the first Pope, recalling his words in the Gospel according to St. Matthew: "You are the Christ, the Son of the living God," in order to illustrate that patrimony, made possible by persistent faith in the Lord, "that the Church, through the apostolic succession, has preserved, deepened and handed on for two thousand years."
Reflecting on Peter's relationship with Christ, the Pope recalled that Jesus, our Saviour, alone reveals the face of the Father.
"In Him, God, in order to make Himself close and accessible to men and women," he underscored, "revealed Himself to us in the trusting eyes of a child, in the lively mind of a young person and in the mature features of a man, finally appearing to His disciples after the Resurrection with His glorious body."
In this way, the Pope said, "He showed us a model of human holiness that we can all imitate, together with the promise of an eternal destiny that transcends all our limits and abilities."
A gift and a path
The Pope noted that Peter, in his response, understands that it is both "a gift of God" as well as "the path to follow in order to allow himself to be changed by that gift," and affirmed that "they are inseparable aspects of salvation entrusted to the Church to be proclaimed for the good of the human race."
"Indeed," Pope Leo XIV marveled, "they are entrusted to us, who were chosen by Him before we were formed in our mothers’ wombs, reborn in the waters of Baptism and, surpassing our limitations and with no merit of our own, brought here and sent forth from here, so that the Gospel might be proclaimed to every creature."
Called me to be faithful for the Church
The new Pope recalled that God called him, with his election as the 267th Pope yesterday afternoon, to succeed Peter, and, as such, "has entrusted this treasure to me so that, with his help, I may be its faithful administrator for the sake of the entire mystical Body of the Church. "
Yet, Peter, the Pope remembered, makes his profession of faith in reply to a specific question, 'Who do people say that the Son of Man is?”'
This question, Pope Leo highlighted, is not insignificant and concerns "an essential aspect of our ministry, namely, the world in which we live, with its limitations and its potential, its questions and its convictions."
Two different attitudes
“Who do people say that the Son of Man is?” the new Holy Father repeated, noting, "If we reflect on the scene we are considering, we might find two possible answers, which characterize two different attitudes."
First, Pope Leo said, there was the response of the world, which "will not hesitate to reject and eliminate Him" once "His presence becomes irksome" also because of "His stern moral requirements."
Then there is the other possible response to Jesus’ question, that of ordinary people, who see Him "as an upright man of courage"; but to them "He is only a man, and therefore, in times of danger, during His passion, they too abandon Him and depart disappointed."
Missionary outreach needed where difficult to preach witness
What is striking about these two attitudes, the Pope said, is their relevance today, for, they, the Holy Father acknowledged, embody notions that we could easily find on the lips of many men and women in our own time, even if, while essentially identical, they are expressed in different language.
"Even today," he warned, "there are many settings in which the Christian faith is considered absurd, meant for the weak and unintelligent. Settings where other securities are preferred, like technology, money, success, power, or pleasure."
These are contexts, he highlighted, "where it is not easy to preach the Gospel and bear witness to its truth, where believers are mocked, opposed, despised or at best tolerated and pitied."
"Yet, precisely for this reason," he said, "they are the places where our missionary outreach is desperately needed."
Lack of faith accompanied by lack of meaning in life
"A lack of faith," Pope Leo underscored, "is often tragically accompanied by the loss of meaning in life, the neglect of mercy, appalling violations of human dignity, the crisis of the family and so many other wounds that afflict our society."
Today, he observed, "there are many settings in which Jesus, although appreciated as a man, is reduced to a kind of charismatic leader or superman."
Acknowledging this happens "not only among non-believers but also among many baptized Christians," Pope Leo warned that, as such, they "end up living, at this level, in a state of practical atheism."
With this in mind, Pope Leo reassured the congregation, "This is the world that has been entrusted to us, a world in which, as Pope Francis taught us so many times, we are called to bear witness to our joyful faith in Christ the Saviour."
"Therefore," he continued, "it is essential that we too repeat, with Peter: 'You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.'"
Daily journey of conversion
He said it is essential to do this, first of all, in our personal relationship with the Lord, in our commitment to a "daily journey of conversion."
Then as a Church, we are to do the same, he reminded them, "experiencing together our fidelity to the Lord and bringing the Good News to all."
"I say this first of all to myself, as the Successor of Peter, as I begin my mission as Bishop of Rome," he expressed, sharing that he does so according to the well-known expression of Saint Ignatius of Antioch, "to preside in charity over the universal Church."
He recalled that "Saint Ignatius, who was led in chains to this city, the place of his impending sacrifice, wrote to the Christians there: 'Then I will truly be a disciple of Jesus Christ, when the world no longer sees my body.'”
Moving aside to make space for Christ
"Ignatius," Pope Leo explained, "was speaking about being devoured by wild beasts in the arena – and so it happened," he clarified, adding, "But, his words apply more generally to an indispensable commitment for all those in the Church who exercise a ministry of authority."
Specifically, he underscored, that commitment "is to move aside so that Christ may remain, to make oneself small so that he may be known and glorified, to spend oneself to the utmost so that all may have the opportunity to know and love Him."
Pope Leo XIV concluded his homily by praying, "May God grant me this grace, today and always, through the loving intercession of Mary, Mother of the Church."
-
Site: Novus Motus LiturgicusLost in Translation #125 After the lavabo, the priest goes to the middle of the altar, looks up to Heaven, and, bowing, asks the Triune God to receive his entire offering: Súscipe, sancta Trínitas, hanc oblatiónem, quam tibi offérimus ob memoriam passiónis, resurrectiónis, et ascensiónis Jesu Christi, Dómini nostri, et in honórem beátae Maríae semper Vírginis, et beáti Joannis Baptistae, et Michael P. Foleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02649905848645336033noreply@blogger.com0
-
Site: Rorate CaeliA very good first sermon of the new Pope in the mass with the Cardinals at the Sistine Chapel. No buzzwords, just Christ-God. Christological, Christ-centered, Patristic.Leo spoke briefly in English before his sermon, saying:"I want to repeat the words from the Responsorial Psalm: 'I will sing a new song to the Lord, because He has done marvels,' and indeed, not just with me but with all of us."MyNew Catholichttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04118576661605931910noreply@blogger.com
-
Site: Mises InstituteThis week on Friday Philosophy, Dr. David Gordon reviews The Price of Our Values by Augustin Landier and David Thesmar. While the authors claim that economists often substitute utilitarianism for moral values, they dismiss any ide of objective standards for morality.
-
Site: AsiaNews.itCardinal Prevost, a spiritual son of St Augustine, was elected pope on the very day the Church celebrated the liturgical feast of the martyrs of Algeria, among whom were two Augustinian nuns. And in the description of the 'disarmed and disarming' peace of the Risen Christ proclaimed by the new pope in his firstUrbi et Orbiblessing, there echoed the prayer once written by Christian de Chergé, the prior of Tibhirine.
-
Site: Real Investment Advice
The concepts of "smart money" versus "dumb money" refer to the level of investors' information and experience. Smart money, typically institutional investors and often seasoned professionals, has extensive research and is more adept at data analysis. Therefore, they tend to have more disciplined strategies and are less impacted by negative behavioral traits. Conversely, dumb money, or non-professional investors, is often characterized by emotional decisions and trend/momentum-chasing. Historically, smart money tends to outperform dumb money. However, there are market periods like early 2021 when retail trading on platforms like WallStreetBets outmaneuvered hedge funds.
As shown below, smart money (institutions and hedge funds) is aggressively selling this market while individual investors, aka dumb money, are aggressively buying. The difference in opinions is stunning. Hedge funds and institutions are both at or near records for negative stock market outflows, representing extreme bearishness. Conversely, individuals have been buying the dip at the highest rate since 2008. Who will be right this time?
What To Watch Today
Earnings
- No notable earnings releases today
Economy
Market Trading Update
As noted yesterday, we continue to trace out the 2022 market, so far anyway, which begs the question whether the next leg down for the market is about to begin, or if the correction is over. It's a great question with a tough answer. Yesterday, the market rallied sharply on news of a trade deal with the UK. In reality, we have a trade surplus with the UK, which means we should have had a tariff on them. However, that meant that a trade deal was far easier to reach than not. Nonetheless, the market took it as good news and rallied sharply toward the 200-DMA.
From the bearish perspective, with the market short-term overbought, a decent amount of overhead resistance in place (the 100 and 200-DMA are close to converging), and economic data exhibiting some weakness, there is a decent risk of a near-term pullback. However, the bullish view is that momentum is improving, along with market breadth, and share buybacks are fully engaged for this month. Furthermore, the 20 and 50-DMAs support any short-term correction, allowing the bulls to increase equity exposure as needed. There is decent overhead resistance above the market, with support building just below. A breakout to the upside should lead to a significantly higher rally, ending the correction phase. A break below support, and there is also a decent amount of downside risk.
Notably, professional managers are very underweight equities, and the more the market rallies, the more they will be forced to increase exposure. If professional investors become bullish, the markets will likely continue to work higher over the next several months. Of course, that does not preclude 3-5% pullbacks along the way for better entry points to increase exposure.
For the moment, the markets are caught in a bit of "no man's land." As such, while I am getting more constructive on the market, given the tight trading range, it will likely pay to be more cautious for now. While traders can play this range currently, investors should wait for a confirmed breakout above resistance to add to long exposures aggressively. While you won't have bought the bottom, there will still be plenty of upside to gain with much less risk to your capital.
Employment Is Not As Good As Powell Alludes
In his post-FOMC press conference, Jerome Powell alluded that the labor market was in good shape. To wit:
"April nonfarm payrolls report showed that hiring continued at a solid pace, with the economy adding a better-than-expected 177,000 jobs for the month."
April job growth was 177k, but he failed to mention that prior months had been revised down sharply. Consequently, job growth is positive but weakening from last year's pace.
The table below, courtesy of the BLS, tracks revisions to the monthly BLS payrolls data. After the first two columns, the month and year, is the original number of payroll gains. The following two columns show the ensuing monthly revisions. As shown, job growth has been lowered by 124k (-32k,-49k, and -43k). The second table below summarizes the original data and revisions for this year and the prior two years to help contextualize employment trends and the size of revisions. As it shows, the trend (using revised data) has been lower over the two-plus-year period, with more pronounced deterioration this year. Moreover, the average monthly revision has been worse this year than in 2023 and 2024. Typically, employment data revisions are most significant in the periods surrounding economic slowdowns and recessions. Thus, might data revisions indicate that employment is not as robust as Powell suggests?
How To Navigate RMDs And Minimize Taxes In Retirement
Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs) are an unavoidable part of retirement planning for many Americans. While they are designed to ensure retirees eventually pay taxes on their tax-deferred retirement savings, RMDs can also trigger unintended tax burdens if not planned for correctly. With strategic planning, you can manage RMD withdrawals effectively while minimizing retirement taxes and preserving your nest egg.
Minimum Distribution Requirements (RMDs)?
RMDs are the minimum amounts that retirees must withdraw annually from certain tax-advantaged retirement accounts, such as:
- Traditional IRAs
- 401(k)s
- 403(b)s
- Other employer-sponsored retirement plans
The IRS mandates that you begin taking RMDs starting at age 73 (as of 2023, due to SECURE Act 2.0). Failing to take your RMD results in a steep penalty—50% of the amount that should have been withdrawn.
Tweet of the Day
“Want to achieve better long-term success in managing your portfolio? Here are our 15-trading rules for managing market risks.”
Please subscribe to the daily commentary to receive these updates every morning before the opening bell.
If you found this blog useful, please send it to someone else, share it on social media, or contact us to set up a meeting.
The post Smart Money Or Dumb Money? Who Will Be Right appeared first on RIA.
-
Site: Zero HedgeGoldman Thinks Nintendo's Switch 2 Will Blow Away Estimates, Sees No Supply ConstraintsTyler Durden Fri, 05/09/2025 - 05:45
Nintendo's first sales forecast for its highly anticipated Switch 2 console came in at 15 million units for the fiscal year ending March—falling short of Bloomberg's analyst consensus of 16.8 million. The miss may reflect growing trade uncertainty and mounting macroeconomic headwinds souring consumer sentiments. The console is slated for release in June.
Goldman gaming analysts Minami Munakata and Haruki Kubota said Nintendo executives typically provide "conservative" estimates before any new console launch.
Here's Munakata and Kubota's first take on the weaker-than-expected sales forecast for Switch 2:
FY3/26 guidance calls for operating profits of ¥320 bn (+13.3% yoy), assuming shipments of 15 mn units for Switch 2 hardware and 45 mn units for software. This is well below GSe (¥483.6 bn) and the Bloomberg consensus (¥449.3 bn).
However, we would note that Nintendo's guidance has tended to be conservative at the time of new hardware launches, with upward revisions then following over the course of the fiscal year (as was the case when the Switch was launched).
Management also said that its 15 mn volume assumption for the Switch 2 is a level it is targeting for year one, and that there are no supply constraints. Given strong demand, with around 2.2 mn customers registering for the Switch 2 ballot sale in Japan alone via the My Nintendo Store website, we think there is ample upside potential to guidance.
The analysts continued:
It explained that while the Switch 2 has a higher selling price than the Switch, which could present a hurdle to early adoption, the Switch 2 offers platform continuity, including backward compatibility with existing game software, which could support penetration. The company also plans to offer bundled software. Management underlined that the 15 mn unit assumption does not reflect any supply constraints. Our conversations with investors have indicated expectations for shipments of 17-18 mn units, which we consider achievable given that Nintendo has confirmed no major supply constraints and that demand appears strong based on ballot sale registrations.
Separately, Pelham Smithers, managing director at Japan equity research firm Pelham Smithers Associates, noted, "You will have a good portion who will think management is being cautious, knowing that there's little upside in being too bullish at this stage. However, you'll also have a portion that will be concerned that Nintendo may look to keep the Switch 2 in short supply through this fiscal year."
Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Nathan Naidu commented on the positive pre-order trends:
Nintendo's softer-than-expected fiscal 2026 sales and profit guidance vs. consensus is in line with an historically conservative stance, which tariffs probably justify. Positive pre-order trends in Japan, the US and other key markets suggest the company might achieve the 15 million-unit sales goal earlier for its Switch 2 video-game console. The 45 million software-unit goal also seems beatable, with the strong lineup of third-party games — including Cyberpunk 2077 — and in-house ones helping activate or entice upgrades among Nintendo's 366 million users.
Two weeks ago, we commented on the numerous reports from major retailers about the Switch 2 selling out...
Nintendo Switch 2 Frenzy: "Selling Out" Across US Retailers As Tariffs Won't Impact Pricing https://t.co/iGaSCMTxm1
— zerohedge (@zerohedge) April 24, 2025Recall that the Goldman analysts are Nintendo bulls who have previously stated that Switch 2 (the successor to the Nintendo Switch) will "unlock dormant hardware and dormant users" and send "the number of active consoles to continue to renew record highs."
Maybe Goldman and other analysts are correct—management could simply be offering conservative estimates ahead of the highly anticipated Switch 2 launch in June.
-
Site: Crisis Magazine
Habemus Papam! As I’m sure you’re all aware, we have a new pope: Leo XIV, formerly known as Cardinal Robert Francis Prevost, O.S.A. Although somewhat of a dark horse candidate, before the conclave he was seen as a potential “compromise” choice. However, his election on only the 4th ballot makes it hard to see that being the case; many Cardinals must have had him in mind before the doors were…
-
Site: Real Investment Advice
While coming in much stronger than expected, the latest employment data confirmed what we already suspected: the economy is slowing. The reason the employment data is so important is that without employment growth, the economy stalls. It takes, on average, about 200,000 jobs each month to keep up with population growth, which ultimately keeps the economy growing. That is because, as discussed in last week's #BullBearReport, the consumer comprises about 70% of economic growth. To wit:
"There is currently no evidence that the economy is slipping into a recession. However, if you want to know if an economic decline will evolve into a recession, there is one key factor to consider: consumer spending. Consumer spending comprises nearly 70% of the GDP calculation, and everything else, from business investment to imports and exports, is a function of the consumer’s “demand.” In other words, if the consumer is slowing down or contracting spending, businesses will not “invest” in expansion projects, increasing employment, or buying more products for resale. That relationship is shown in the chart below, which compares PCE to employment and private investment."
However, most crucially, consumers can not consume without producing something first. Production must come first to generate the income needed for that consumption. The cycle is displayed below.
Here is the most critical point. Not all jobs are equal.
“For a household to consume at an economically sustainable rate, such requires full-time employment. These jobs provide higher wages, benefits, and health insurance to support a family. Part-time jobs do not.”
While the media touts the ‘strong employment reports,’ such is mostly the recovery of jobs lost during the economic shutdown. However, the reality is that the full-time employment rate is falling sharply. Historically, when the rate of change in full-time employment dropped below zero, the economy entered a recession.
Notably, given the surge in immigration into the U.S. over the last few years, the all-important ratio of those employed full-time relative to the population has dropped sharply. As noted, given that full-time employment provides the resources for excess consumption, that ratio should increase for the economy to continue growing strongly. However, full-time employment has decreased since the turn of the century as automation, technology, and offshoring have risen. While President Biden recently touted strong employment growth in his SOTU address, full-time employment as a percentage of the working-age population failed to recover to pre-pandemic levels.
Notably, sharp downturns in full-time employment have been coincident with recessionary onsets.
No Recession, But Slower Growth Coming
The latest employment data put to rest recession concerns, at least for now. Employment growth remains strong enough to support economic growth and quell concerns that CEOs are withdrawing from the job creation process. However, compensation continues to decline as economic demand slows.
As is always the case, as the economy slows down, employers begin to change the most costly aspect of any business – employment. Cutting full-time jobs is the most efficient way to protect earnings and profitability. However, employers tend to hang on to employees as long as possible, as good employees are expensive to train and hard to replace. Eventually, if the demand falls too much, full-time employees are sacrificed to protect profits. As such, a reasonably predictable cycle continues until exhaustion is reached.
While we are seeing declines in full-time employment as the economy slows, we are now also seeing cuts in temporary help, which, as shown, is consistent with slowing growth. The reason is that cutting temporary employment is the first step by business owners to reduce employment costs while hanging on to full-time, and mostly crucial, employees. However, as noted above, once temporary workers are exhausted, the next step will ultimately be full-time employees.
The latest employment data did not provide much support for the "recession" crowd in 2025. As such, Wall Street analysts are quickly reversing their recession calls for this year, and are becoming more focused on slowing economic growth. However, that assessment can certainly change promptly if personal consumption expenditures take a turn for the worse. As noted above, nearly 70% of economic growth is derived from consumption; therefore, if consumption declines, employment falls, reducing consumption and further employment declines. When it accelerates, that cycle is the foundation for recession outcomes.
Indicators We Are Watching
As noted, while the employment data is weak, there are certainly indicators we are watching closely to confirm whether "job loss" is accelerating. First, we pay attention to the Conference Board's measure of CEO confidence. Since the October 2022 lows, CEO confidence has continued to improve, and as of Q1, it rose to 60 from 51 in Q4 of 2024. That confidence increased full-time employment as the outlook for economic growth was improving heading into 2025. However, this is a lagging indicator, and the results of the Q1 survey were taken in February before the market decline and tariff announcements. Later this month, we will get an update to see if sentiment has changed, which could give us clues about future employment reports.
The second indicator we are watching is the NFIB small business confidence index. Specically,.it is their "plans" to increase employment versus what they do. Notably, employment by small businesses, roughly 50% of the total employment in the U.S., has remained stagnant since the pandemic. However, small business owners were very optimistic about hiring post-pandemic, expecting sharp improvements in sales. However, that optimism is fading quickly.
The reason is that, as discussed at the opening of this discussion, employment is a function of the demand for goods and services that businesses supply. As shown, expectations for sales surged following President Trump's election, but given that actual sales have failed to materialize, that optimism is fading rather quickly. Expectations for business owners are one thing, but without actual increases in sales, which drive revenue, there is little reason to increase full-time employment, which is why it has remained stuck at lower levels since 2020.
Conclusion
Given the importance of consumption in the economy and that employment (production) must come first in the cycle, attention to employment data, particularly full-time employment, is crucial to determining economic risk. The risk of a recession remains very low; however, that can change if something causes consumption to contract quickly. Aside from an unexpected, exogenous impact, investors should expect economic growth to continue to slowly weaken to a longer-term trend slightly less than 2% annually. Unfortunately, while not recessionary, that growth rate will make it hard for corporate profitability to remain at record levels.
Eventually, a valuation adjustment in the financial markets will reflect the reality of a slow-growth economy. However, that isn't today. However, the risk of a decade of low returns as markets normalize for a slow-growth economy is steadily increasing.
Just something to consider.
For more in-depth analysis and actionable investment strategies, visit RealInvestmentAdvice.com. Stay ahead of the markets with expert insights tailored to help you achieve your financial goals.
The post Employment Data Confirms Economy Is Slowing appeared first on RIA.
-
Site: PeakProsperityJoin Chris and Evie for the Signal Hour live at 1pm ET.
Pages
