It is sad that there are what you might call professional Catholics who make a living on their Catholicism, but in whom the spring of faith flows only faintly, in a few scattered drops. We must really make an effort to change this.
Distinction Matter - Subscribed Feeds
-
Site: Catholic ConclaveControversy over 8 per 1000. The CEI: "We are disappointed, the Church is damaged"Cardinal Matteo Zuppi, Archbishop of Bologna and President of the CEI, expressed "disappointment at the Government's decision to unilaterally change the purposes and methods of attribution of the 8 per 1000 pertaining to the State"The controversy over the 8 per 1000 is heating up, with Cardinal Matteo Zuppi, Catholic Conclavehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06227218883606585321noreply@blogger.com0
-
Site: Zero HedgeThe Deficit Crisis Is Really A Recession ProblemTyler Durden Fri, 06/06/2025 - 14:45
Via RealInvestmentAdvice.com,
The graph below provides a clearer understanding of the US fiscal deficit.
First, focus on the red line below, graphing the ratio of federal debt to GDP.
Note that it is at the same level today as it was in 2021. Similarly, before the pandemic, it had been relatively flat for seven years. This highlights that the deficit problem we have today was exacerbated by recession-prompted fiscal stimulus and the temporary decline in GDP.
To illustrate this more clearly, we created the green line.
This version of the debt-to-GDP ratio assumes zero change in the ratio during recessions. Moreover, it uses the same growth rates as the all-inclusive debt-to-GDP ratio to calculate the growth for periods outside of recession.
As the green line indicates, the ratio today is the same as it was over 10 years ago. Furthermore, it is close to levels seen in the mid-1990s. The takeaway from comparing the two lines is that the ratio of debt to GDP follows a stairstep pattern.
It’s generally flat during periods of growth, while it accelerates during recessions.
The point in playing with the data is not to belittle the deficit problem. Instead, we think it’s essential to acknowledge that the deficit problem is primarily associated with recessionary stimulus. Thus, maybe we should consider how we spend stimulus funds during recessions. In particular, might a focus toward productive stimulus during recessions provide a greater long term economic boost?
Still, if there is no recession in the near future, we might find that today’s deficits are not significantly worsening as some pundits lead us to believe.
Might they be too focused on the deficit amount stated in dollars, rather than as a ratio to our ability to pay for it, i.e., economic growth?
-
Site: Zero HedgeSupreme Court Sides With DOGE In Social Security, Records CasesTyler Durden Fri, 06/06/2025 - 14:45
Authored by Matthew Vadum via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),
The Supreme Court handed the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) two big wins late on June 6 in its effort to reduce the size of the federal government.
The U.S. Supreme Court in Washington on June 3, 2025.Madalina Vasiliu/The Epoch Times
The nation’s highest court issued the two unsigned rulings at the same time.
One order removed a block on DOGE staffers accessing sensitive data at the Social Security Administration.Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented in the case known as Social Security Administration v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees.
The other new order, in U.S. DOGE Service v. CREW, formally blocked lower court orders requiring DOGE to respond to freedom of information requests in a pending lawsuit.
That order came after Chief Justice John Roberts on May 23 issued an administrative stay temporarily blocking the lower court orders.President Donald Trump issued Executive Order 14158 on Jan. 20, renaming the United States Digital Service as the United States DOGE Service and creating an advisory body that recommends cost-cutting measures for federal agencies.
The executive order directed the entity to “implement the President’s DOGE Agenda, by modernizing Federal technology and software to maximize governmental efficiency and productivity.”
-
Site: Catholic ConclaveSempio's lawyer talks about exorcisms, the Church and hitmen: "Stasi knows but must keep quiet". And that time Lovati was questioned by prosecutors for blackmailing the priestA supporter of the innocence of both his client and Alberto Stasi, the lawyer takes up the scandal of the Santuario della BozzolaHe is not only defending Andrea Sempio, the new suspect in the investigation into the Garlasco Catholic Conclavehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06227218883606585321noreply@blogger.com0
-
Site: Zero HedgePower CEO: US Risks Losing AI Race Without Transmission Grid OverhaulTyler Durden Fri, 06/06/2025 - 14:25
Ukrainian-American entrepreneur Michael Polsky, CEO of energy developer Invenergy—the firm behind the proposed $11 billion Grain Belt Express power superhighway—warned that the U.S. risks falling behind in the global artificial intelligence race if its outdated transmission infrastructure isn't urgently modernized.
Polsky's warning is especially timely, given that his company is working to break ground on an 800-mile high-voltage transmission line designed to deliver 5 gigawatts of power — the equivalent of five nuclear reactors — from Kansas to the eastern U.S., connecting multiple regional grids to power data centers and onshore manufacturing trends.
He told Bloomberg that the Trump administration issued executive orders signaling an energy emergency, and "I do believe it's an emergency because of how difficult it is to build things," adding, "We don't have decades to figure this out. We have years."
A look at the U.S. transmission line map makes one thing clear: a massive amount of copper will be required. Copper bulls know this...
He argues that energy infrastructure developers need the same level of federal backing that Elon Musk receives for space projects, emphasizing the urgent need for a national transmission authority to build high-voltage power lines—modeled after the national highway system.
Invenergy has developed over 190 projects totaling more than 30 gigawatts of capacity in operation, under construction, or contracted. The latest project, the Grain Belt Express, aims to break ground next year and has received a conditional commitment for a loan guarantee of up to $4.9 billion from the Department of Energy under the Biden administration. It's uncertain if those funds will materialize in the Trump era.
On Thursday, we highlighted spare generation capacity on America's grid is "getting critically tight" and may unleash power blackouts and other disruptions during peak demand hours. We advised readers to start exploring alternative backup power solutions for their homes—such as solar systems or on-demand diesel and natural gas generators.
Polsky also emphasized that America's ability to win the AI race against China and other rising powers depends on Washington expediting the construction of transmission power superhighways to move large quantities of electricity across the country and strengthen the national grid in the era of soaring power demand (read: Next AI Trade).
-
Site: Zero HedgeCOVID-19 Vaccine Reform Is Moving Slower Than Many Had HopedTyler Durden Fri, 06/06/2025 - 14:05
Authored by Maryanne Demasi via The Brownstone Institute,
Just three weeks after Dr Vinay Prasad assumed oversight of vaccines at the FDA, Moderna’s latest Covid-19 vaccine, mNEXSPIKE®, received full approval.
For those who had hoped the mRNA platform would be shelved, the decision landed like a gut punch.
Approved on 31 May 2025, the next-generation shot is intended for adults over 65, as well as individuals aged 12 to 64 with at least one risk factor for severe illness.
And it came under the watch of a man who had spent years demanding greater scientific rigour from the agency.
Prasad had been among the FDA’s most outspoken critics during the pandemic, repeatedly condemning its reliance on surrogate endpoints—such as antibody levels—rather than hard clinical outcomes like reduced hospitalisation or death.
And he didn’t just say it once. He drove the point home, over and over.
“Showing boosters improve neutralizing antibodies or other laboratory measures is not what we need,” he posted on X in July 2022.
“We need randomized control trials powered for clinical endpoints showing boosters improve outcomes that people care about.”
In January 2023, he co-signed a formal Citizen Petition to the FDA stating, “This immunobridging surrogate endpoint has not been validated to predict clinical efficacy.”
Then in March 2023, he made his position even clearer on Substack. “I don’t care about transient antibody titer levels,” he wrote.
But mNEXSPIKE® appears to have been approved primarily using exactly those kinds of data—measures of immune response, not measures of meaningful outcomes.
So, how do we square that?
Technically, the approval aligns with the policy Prasad outlined in a recent New England Journal of Medicine article.
There, he proposed a two-track system—no further vaccine approvals for healthy adults without RCTs showing clinical benefit—but for older adults and at-risk individuals, immunobridging data could still be acceptable.
So yes, by that standard, mNEXSPIKE® fits the rules.
But it doesn’t erase the discomfort. Because for years, Prasad insisted those very shortcuts—approving Covid vaccines based on antibody levels instead of clinical outcomes—were scientifically flimsy.
Now, under his watch, those same shortcuts are back in play.
When Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. was appointed HHS Secretary, reform didn’t just seem likely—it felt imminent.
Many expected the mRNA shots would be pulled from the market, or at the very least, that new approvals would be frozen until stronger evidence emerged.
Instead, we’ve seen a flood of high-production videos and polished slogans about “restoring public trust.”
To many observers, it looks like transparency on the surface, but business as usual underneath.
Of course, no one said this would be easy.
Having worked in government as a political adviser, I know how hard it is to shift systems that are not only slow and bureaucratic but deeply enmeshed with commercial interests. And no sector is more heavily invested in mRNA than biotech.
This isn’t just about Covid anymore. The pharmaceutical industry has poured billions into mRNA vaccines for RSV, flu, HIV, cancer, and more. Entire product pipelines are now staked on the assumption that the technology is here to stay.
Pulling the plug wouldn’t just alter public health policy—it would tank portfolios, gut R&D budgets, and unleash a political and financial firestorm from some of the most powerful corporate interests on earth.
That’s the kind of pressure Prasad is under now. That’s the reality Kennedy’s team has stepped into.
This is no longer science versus ideology. It’s science versus entrenched industry power.
And many are beginning to worry we’re watching the same playbook unfold—just with better branding.
That’s not what MAHA supporters or vaccine-injured families were hoping for. They’re not asking for tweaks. They want the shots gone. Not revised. Not updated—just gone.
But political reality rarely keeps pace with public demand. Even the most determined reformers can’t move faster than the machinery they’re trying to dismantle.
So where does that leave us?
Facing the hardest task of all—staying in the fight.
Progress may feel glacial, but it is underway.
The CDC has removed routine Covid-19 vaccine recommendations for healthy children and pregnant women.
Prasad’s new framework has halted low-risk approvals unless backed by RCTs.
Yes, the mRNA platform is still alive - and still fiercely protected - but reform was never going to be easy. And it was never going to come all at once.
Republished from the author’s Substack
-
Site: LifeNews
A few years ago, a friend shared with me that her pastor and his wife were expecting a baby, a blessing that the whole church had celebrated. Then, at an ultrasound scan, the baby was diagnosed with a defect. As an obstetrician, I knew that surgery could easily correct the problem and would not cause suffering for the baby. I had seen children thrive under much tougher medical circumstances. Yet the physician told the parents that the baby was “incompatible with life” and that continuing the pregnancy would cause them and the baby to suffer. After praying, the pastor and his wife concluded that obtaining an abortion would spare the baby and themselves from further pain. To them, it was the compassionate option.
The story has many troubling aspects, not least of which is the parents’ decision based on inaccurate information about the child’s chance of surviving and thriving. But what troubles me most is that I encounter fellow Lutherans who have bought the narrative that it is better for babies with physical imperfections to be aborted rather than embraced and loved for whatever time the Lord allows them to live. I offer four problems with that mindset.
First, we all have imperfections. What degree of physical or genetic imperfection is sufficient to warrant death? Some say “a severe defect.” But severity varies from person to person. I knew a Lutheran ICU nurse who adopted three “severely” handicapped children who had been labeled as “incompatible with life.” She raised them until they died — between 5 and 20 years. These children’s limitations never stood in the way of her love for them. Nothing in Scripture tells us to kill our physically or genetically limited neighbors. Rather, even though our culture might consider the man lying beaten and near death on the road to Jericho to have a life-limiting condition, the Good Samaritan spared no expense in caring for him.
Follow LifeNews.com on Instagram for pro-life pictures and videos.
Second, we need to reflect on the concept of “relieving the child’s suffering.” We know from surgeries performed on children in the womb that they exhibit the same kind of responses to pain that we do. They withdraw from sharp objects touching them; they show an increase in heart rate and stress hormones. When doctors operate on patients in utero, they give them anesthesia that is separate from their mom’s. Unborn children feel pain from at least 12 weeks’ gestation. However, children in the womb with “life-limiting” diagnoses do not exhibit the normal signs of pain from those illnesses. In fact, the womb is the most comfortable place for them, as the mother provides for all the baby’s bodily needs. Cutting short these children’s lives to end their suffering makes no sense. In fact, performing an abortion causes intense suffering for the child. In this case, the real driver for abortion seems to be the assumption that it will end the psychological suffering of the parents rather than compassion for the child.
This leads to the third point: Aborting pregnancies with fatal diagnoses does not result in less suffering for parents. Studies comparing the outcomes of aborting such pregnancies versus carrying them to term using a service called perinatal hospice have found that parents who choose to carry the baby to term suffer less complicated grief and have less regret than parents who abort. In fact, overall, women who abort unplanned pregnancies have a greater risk of suicide, drug abuse and major depression than women who carry those pregnancies to birth.
Parents who are encouraged to abort their child with a “life-limiting” diagnosis are being told that this child is an “it,” a disposable clump of cells. But, in reality, women bond to the children in their wombs and grieve their loss. When a woman decides to end her child’s little life, it compounds and complicates grief. In contrast, perinatal hospice acknowledges that the parents of a child with a “life-limiting” diagnosis are parents. And this child in the womb is a son or daughter, a grandson or granddaughter, a brother or sister — a human being in God-given relationships with family members who love them. Giving birth to these little ones also gives extended family members the opportunity to acknowledge that relationship and grieve that tiny life. Why would we cut that life short?
The fourth point: What if the diagnosis was wrong? I had a son with a fatal congenital heart defect; he died at age two and a half. With my next pregnancy, the prenatal ultrasound showed that my second son had the same diagnosis. Two cardiac ultrasounds confirmed that he would share the fate of my first. Needless to say, the pregnancy was difficult. However, when he was born, he did not in fact have the fatal defect. Medicine is not perfect, yet we make life-ending decisions based on imperfect information. Am I against prenatal testing? No. But we must understand that no test is perfect. And perhaps we should recognize that God has given this child as a chance to show the beauty of this human being for as long as it pleases Him to share that baby’s life with us.
This view of all human life as a gift leads us as Lutherans to treat those in the womb as our tiniest neighbors. When we face difficult situations that call for us to lay down our lives for our neighbors, we are strengthened by seeing the meaning behind the suffering that we are asked to bear for one another. That is why killing our neighbor to avoid suffering has no place in Lutheran theology. It is why, for the last 2,000 years, the Christian church has consistently opposed abortion.
Bearing suffering is undeniably a part of living in Christian community. And there are certainly times when pregnancy involves suffering. To the secular world steeped in self-idolatry, suffering for one’s neighbor seems nonsensical. They often see pregnancy as a disease and abortion as its cure. However, we suffer as part of the love we show to our neighbor. God has given each mother a little neighbor, chosen specifically for her, formed from her body. The suffering involved in loving this neighbor is part of God’s good and gracious will for our lives.
As a physician, I have seen women heroically embrace the difficulties of pregnancy and then experience great joy at their children’s births. I have also treated situations where the mom’s life is threatened by her pregnancy. Sometimes — rarely — it is necessary to separate the mom and the baby to save the mother’s life. Most of these situations happen at gestational ages where the baby can survive the separation. But even more rarely, they occur at gestational ages where the baby cannot survive. In those tragic situations, physicians must still separate the mom and baby — otherwise, both will die. But good doctors understand that they must give parents a chance to hold their baby, whether alive or dead, and give them time to grieve. To do this, we separate in a way that maximizes chances of the baby’s body remaining intact. These separations are not done at abortion clinics. Abortion clinics cannot take care of mothers in life-threatening situations. Abortion clinics are designed to end healthy pregnancies for nonmedical reasons. In general, abortion procedures, especially after 14 weeks, produce baby pieces, not an intact, recognizable baby, and thus deny parents the ability to hold and grieve their child.
Another common view on abortion is that denying women elective abortions will harm their mental health. Popular media frames abortion bans as forcing a woman to give birth and claims that simply carrying an unplanned pregnancy to term will cause psychological pain and trauma. But the scientific literature shows the opposite. Abortion advocates primarily quote the Turnaway Study, which analyzes outcomes for women who sought abortions but were denied by the clinic. Ironically, this study shows that within five years, these women’s mental health was the same as that of women who obtained abortions. Furthermore, several other studies find the opposite of what the media claims: obtaining abortions in fact harms women’s mental health.
From 1993 to 2018, at least 75 studies examined the link between abortion and mental health. Two-thirds of those studies showed a correlation between abortion and adverse mental health outcomes. Studies show abortion significantly increases the risk of depression, anxiety, substance abuse and suicidal behavior when compared to women with unintended pregnancies who choose to carry the baby to birth. A Finnish study found that women were six times more likely to commit suicide after abortion when compared to women who gave birth. Most social scientist scholars agree that at least 20–30% of women who have an abortion suffer serious, prolonged negative psychological consequences. Women deserve better than the psychological damage caused by abortion.
As a physician, I have also been astounded at the perversity of pro-abortion medical professional organizations sowing confusion about what abortion is and what abortion bans forbid. For purposes of state laws, abortions are defined as procedures done or drugs administered with the intent to kill a living human being in the womb. That’s it. This is critically important to understand because it explains what is not an abortion. The treatment of a miscarriage is not an abortion because the baby has already died. Separating the mom and the baby when the mom’s life is threatened is not an abortion, and that includes treatment of ectopic pregnancies. OB-GYN doctors should know this. They are trained for years in residency to recognize and act when there is a life-threatening situation. If your doctor is confused about what a life-threatening situation is, that reveals a problem with the doctor, not the law.
One last common pro-abortion claim worth exploring is that abortion bans will increase maternal mortality. The fact is, however, that hundreds of pro-life hospitals around the country have an excellent track record on maternal health. Ninety-three percent of OB-GYN doctors do not perform abortions in their practice yet give excellent care. And the international data from countries that have enacted abortion bans in recent decades demonstrate that such laws do not increase maternal mortality. Chile’s 1989 abortion ban did not affect the steady decline of its maternal mortality rate, which today is the lowest in South America. In fact, the nations with some of the world’s best maternal mortality statistics, Malta and Poland, have abortion bans in place. Abortion bans do not inherently worsen maternal mortality.
The meaning of words is important. We must combat the attack of serpents who sow fear and confusion; we must offer instead a clear understanding of what abortion is and is not. Do not be deceived by accusations that we lack compassion or that we are forbidding women from getting life-saving treatment. Neither is true. Elective abortion is never life-saving treatment.
I write with compassion for those who have been and are being deceived into supporting the killing of human beings in the womb for no medical reason but out of a misguided belief that somehow it helps women. Nothing could be further from the truth. Elective abortion is not and never has been medical care. Pro-life states in the USA only ban elective abortion — not life-saving medical care and not treatment of miscarriages.
I hope that as Lutheran brothers and sisters we can exercise our authority as citizens to stand up for the least of these human beings, whose lives are precious in God’s eyes.
LifeNews Note: Dr. Donna Harrison, M.D., is a board-certified physician and CEO of The American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists. This article originally appeared in the January 2023 issue of The Lutheran Witness.
The post As an OGBYN I Know Abortion is Not Compassionate. It Kills a Baby appeared first on LifeNews.com.
-
Site: Henrymakow.comPlease send links and comments to hmakow@gmail.com"Ye cannot serve God and Mammon. Therefore I say unto you,Take not thought for your life, what ye shall eat, nor for the body,what ye shall put on. Is not the life more than meat, and the body than raiment? Matt 6:25Forced to choose between God and Mammon, we took a split second to choose GOLD!!In a precarious world, there is a mad quest for a store of value.The satanist bankers have so despoiled the $USD that there are literally a hundred differentcrypto currencies, meme coins and meme stocks with no inherent value except for the madness of crowds. People are literally minting their own currencies!Helping the $USD to crash and burn with his spending, even President Trump has his own currency!While people scramble for a store of value, no one is considering our soul connection to God. Satanists have taught us to cringe at the very mention of "God."No one realizes or cares that our real security lies in Self development, in experiencing and expressing our Selves. We were made in the image of God. But our society is satanically possessed, ruled by gold (money) and sex. There is a tacit prohibition against being ourselves. The Satanists in charge are determined to stamp out any hint of God (Perfection, the Moral Order) from the world.Society suffers from a profound spiritual malaise. We are not ourSelves. Spiritual seers have taught us that we can experience our true spiritual identity by controlling our perception (thoughts.)God is perfection (Bliss, Love, Goodness, Truth, Justice, Beauty.) When someone expresses their Divinity through some awesome deed or accomplishment, no one cares what his race, religion or gender is. Let us all meet at this Pinnacle.Eckhard Tolle - Die in the Ego to live in the Sprit-Elon Musk has confirmed what we have known for years, Trump is a blackmailed Mossad agent. Epstein filmed him raping underaged girls.The MSM and our bought politicians are doing everything they can to obfuscate this but it cannot be ignored!! Trump is being blackmailed to attack Iran.Yet the MSM is calling this "a slur." The Daily Mail Online proclaims-Joe Rogan tries to spin Musk's revelation. How does Musk know Trump is a pedophile and rapist?What alternate reality does Joe Rogan live in?----Trump-Musk row explodes as billionaire claims President named in Epstein files | BBC News"The key political partnership between Donald Trump and Elon and Elon Musk has exploded in spectacular fashion with a bitter war of words.It began when Mr Trump said he was "surprised and disappointed" at Elon Musk's criticism of his flagship budget bill. He said they had had a "great relationship" but "I don't know if we will any more".Elon Musk responded on his social media platform X with a series of increasingly heated remarks about his former boss. He said the President's claims that he has supported the budget bill were "false". He said Mr Trump was "ungrateful" for his help in getting elected and would have lost the election without his financial support. Elon Musk also claimed that the President's tariffs policy would lead to a recession.Then Musk made an extraordinary allegation. He said that Donald Trump is in the files about the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. He said that "is the real reason they have not been made public".Donald Trump suggested that the easiest way to save money would be to terminate the billions of dollars in government contracts and subsidies that go to Elon Musk's companies."--PA DEM SENATOR MADELAINE DEAN MAKES CHABAD'S HOWARD LUTNICK LOOK LIKE AN IDIOT--Soros-Backed NGOs Push Legalized Marijuana For Ukrainians Amid Devastating WarGoldman Sachs warns U.S. power grid nearing collapse as AI and EVs overwhelm aging infrastructurePalantir's unchecked surveillance empire expanding: How a CIA-backed data giant threatens liberty and fuels global oppressionNowhere is Palantir's lethality more apparent than in its work with the Israeli military. The company's AI system Lavender has been accused of automating genocide in Gaza, flagging tens of thousands of Palestinians--including civilians--as potential targets. Karp, a self-described "militant Zionist," openly admitted Palantir's role in the slaughter, dismissing the dead as "mostly terrorists." Meanwhile, Palantir's board convened in Tel Aviv earlier this year, signaling its deep ties to Israel's security apparatus.Hamdi Mig--"Tomorrow is Eid al-Adha, Gaza is supposed to be like any other country in the world, eating food and celebrating its holiday, but Eid in Gaza is different, under killing, destruction and occupation, with no food, no drink or any manifestation of worldly life, but we do not despair and we hope that the torrent of killing and blood will stop soon. Please help me in trying to buy food and stay alive."A Way to Help GazaCCP Infiltrating US Institutions As JBS Leads Resistance: Bill Jasper on InfoWarsThe New American's Senior Editor William F. Jasper articulates the threat and provides succinct solutions in a must-see interview with Alex Jones, who has identified Jasper as the top expert on globalism and the CCP.Jones, the mastermind behind infowars.com, and Jasper also unpack issues with President Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill" and the globalist's next moves.
-
Site: Zero HedgeThe Ratchet Effect: Easy To Spend More, Spending Less Triggers CollapseTyler Durden Fri, 06/06/2025 - 13:25
Authored by Charles Hugh Smith via OfTwoMinds blog,
What's required is not just a revised spreadsheet but an entirely new culture and value system.
I've been referencing The Ratchet Effect since 2010 as it explains why shrinking bloat is so much harder than expanding bloat.
A common example is household income and spending. When the couple were just starting out, they lived like students with barebones expenses. Then as their income rises, so do their expenses, and so by the time they're making $300,000 a year, every dollar is already spent yet they're still deep in debt. LA couple who earn $300K/year told Dave Ramsey they're drowning in $119K of debt.
Institutional bloat is even more difficult to reverse. Way back in 2010, I posted a link documenting how a major public university's administrative staff bloated up from 3.2 full-time administrators per 100 students in 1993 (before student loan debt skyrocketed) to 13.5 administrators per 100 students in 2007. The Ratchet Effect: Fiefdom Bloat and Resistance to Declining Incomes (August 23, 2010).
As staffing increases, a powerful self-interest in maintaining the status quo becomes the norm. This drive to maintain the status quo at all costs becomes the implicit mission of the organization. As budgets expand, there's no end to the ways it can be spent--all in service of "improving" something or other.
Human ego manifests The Ratchet Effect as well. We like to live large and show off our shiny new campus offices, and resist downsizing and sacrifices with every fiber of our being.
In households, we want to maintain the look and feel of our elevated status: our numerous travel extravagances, our new SUV, etc. But the financial The Ratchet Effect is key, for it's easy to add debt and painful to make sacrifices to pay debt off.
Another core dynamic of The Ratchet Effect is the normalization of extremes. As expenses and debt soar, we soon view what would have been seen as extreme in a previous era as not just normal but sustainable.
So student loans go from $0 in early 1993 to $1.8 trillion in Q4 2024, and nobody thinks anything is extreme because it's been going on so long we accept it as normal.
The dynamic that leads to collapse is as invisible as the extremes. Once the organization--household, institution, corporation or nation-state, the dynamic is scale-invariant--has hardened into a brittle state of stasis, it's impossible to shrink the budget without collapsing the entire structure.
I call this the Rising Wedge Model of Breakdown: as expenses, self-interest and debt all expand, it becomes increasingly difficult to slash expenses without triggering the implosion of the organization.
Under the guise of cutting the fat to save the muscle, what actually happens is the muscle is cut to save the fat. This is a complex process, but in summary, the most competent realize the organization is dysfunctional and cannot be salvaged in its current bloated state of denial, and so they immediately jump ship.
The naive who believe they can turn the situation around give it their best effort but the resistance to any meaningful sacrifices is so tenacious that they burn out and quit.
That leaves the delusionally incompetent who reckon they're finally getting the power they long deserved. This leads to the substitution of PR and artifice for actually reducing the organization to a sustainable level, for what's required is not just a revised spreadsheet but an entirely new culture and value system.
This chart I prepared in 2010 summarizes the dynamics of breakdown.
As an example of all these Ratchet Effect dynamics, let's look at student loans. Prior to the start of the student loan machinery in 1993, the U.S. had a mysterious ability to educate millions of university students without burdening the students with trillions of dollars of student loan debt.
Some believe the aliens enabled this fabulous accomplishment, as it's obviously far beyond the reach of mere humans.
The substitution of debt for competence really took off in the aftermath of the Global Financial Meltdown of 2008-09, when the Federal Reserve instituted ZIRP, Zero Interest Rate Policy, making borrowing "affordable" (heh), and our wisdom-infused political leaders declared student loan debt undischargeable in bankruptcy, virtually the only type of consumer loan that cannot be discharged in bankruptcy.
This serves the interests of the wealthy who own the securitized student loan debt as income-producing assets. It would be a crying shame if a student debt-serf could get out of paying interest, depriving poor millionaires of income desperately needed to live large.
As is easily predictable in the context of the Rising Wedge Model of Breakdown / The Ratchet Effect, higher education is now imploding as revenues decline. That the university operated perfectly well 30 years ago with 3 administrators per 100 students is like marveling at the Great Pyramid: how did mere humans manage to do such monumental work? Now the reduction from 14 administrators per 100 students to 12 administrators per 100 students is shattering the foundations of the institution.
The story of the next decade is the playing out of the Rising Wedge Model of Breakdown / The Ratchet Effect throughout the entire status quo: households, institutions, corporations and nation-states will all hasten to cut muscle to save the fat and then wonder why everything is imploding under the weight of delusion and denial.
As noted previously, what's required is not just a revised spreadsheet but an entirely new culture and value system. Without that, we get zip, zero, nada in meaningful adaptation to new realities.
* * *
-
Site: LifeNews
The legal status of abortion across the states is shaped not only by the Dobbs decision but also by a range of additional factors. These include recent state constitutional rulings interpreting abortion as a protected right; the passage of laws aimed at safeguarding unborn life; ongoing litigation challenging or defending those laws; and the implementation of so-called “shield laws.” These are laws designed to protect abortion providers who reside in abortion-friendly states who prescribe abortions pills in states where abortion is almost entirely proscribed.
In the three years since Dobbs, these developments have significantly sculpted the abortion landscape. As a result, the 2025 state legislative sessions have seen a significant amount of activity on both sides of the issue. States either reinforced life-saving protections for unborn life or expanded lethal access to abortion on demand through new statutes and constitutional amendments.
Constitutional Amendments
The Missouri legislature is placing a pro-life amendment on the 2026 ballot which would repeal Amendment 3 that narrowly passed last year. Additionally, the amendment includes various pro-life protections but also exceptions for medical emergency, sexual assault, and a fatal fetal condition.
SUPPORT LIFENEWS! If you want to help fight abortion, please donate to LifeNews.com!
In 2026, Nevada is facing a second vote on the pro-abortion ballot measure Question 6, the “Right to Abortion Initiative” which was previously approved by voters in 2024. Nevada requires the amendment to pass in two consecutive general elections.
In great news, Arkansas, Florida and Oklahoma have passed new laws amending their existing ballot measure procedures to strengthen the integrity of the constitutional amendment process. These reforms aim to prevent bad actors from using deceptive or fraudulent tactics to place measures on the ballot.
We’ll first look at 2025 pro-abortion trends and activities before finishing with pro-life trends and initiatives.
Six states introduced bills that amended their abortionist-evasion laws (shield laws) to assure that the name of the abortionist not be on the label. The label would instead list the name of the facility that employs them. The law was introduced in six states and enacted in Colorado, Maine, and New York. In Nevada, the proposal was sent to the Governor at the end of May for his signature. The pro-abortion lobby is pushing these measures claiming to enhance privacy protections for abortionists and shield them from litigation in states that protect the unborn.
Pro-abortionists naturally proposed direct taxpayer funding of abortion services and attempted to codify abortion on demand through statutory changes or constitutional amendments.
Colorado enacted a law implementing the abortion Amendment 79, the “Right to Abortion and Health Insurance Coverage Initiative” that passed last year. It requires taxpayer funding of abortion coverage in insurance policies for state employees and people on Medicaid. In January, Massachusetts awarded $1.8 million for financial assistance to women seeking abortion. Instead of investing in life-affirming programs so that families can choose life, the state is forcing taxpayers to pay for the willful destruction of human lives. Connecticut also passed legislation that allocated $800,000 taxpayer dollars to Planned Parenthood.
In Vermont, the governor recently signed a sweeping law that greatly expands legal protections for abortion providers of online abortions drugs whether they live in the state or anywhere in the U.S.
The newly-enacted law permits healthcare providers to prescribe abortion-inducing drugs through an online questionnaire without any contact, or even an online “chat,” with a health care provider.
Leaders of Vermont Right to Life, as well as the Vermont Medical Practice board, objected to the provision and noted that the language significantly lowers the standard of medical oversight. All objections were dismissed, ridiculed and ignored. The bill was passed, despite testimony pointing out that anyone could be filling out the questionnaire, including abusive partners, men, minors, and those much further along in pregnancy or not pregnant at all.
During legislative testimony, a New York abortionist, Dr. Linda Prine, made a startling—though not surprising—admission: she prescribes abortion pills via tele-health 50 to 60 times a day. She also admitted that while she prescribes up to 13 weeks, there are “semi underground” providers who will prescribe the abortion drugs later in pregnancy.
The law also weaponizes consumer protection laws to target pregnancy resource centers (PRCs), individuals and others. It empowers the pro-abortion attorney general to determine what speech is “misleading” or even has the “tendency to mislead.” This is an alarming overreach.
Ironically, just mere days after the Governor signed the bill into law, a study was released indicating that the abortion pills were 22 times more dangerous than originally believed. The new Secretary of Health and Human Services called for an investigation into the serious side-effects of the drugs.
It will come as no surprise that Planned Parenthood of Vermont testified in favor of passage. In Vermont, anything the abortion giant requests is immediately acted upon by the pro-abortion super-majority in the House and Senate. Protecting the health and safety of the girls and women who use the abortion drug cocktail believing it is just like swallowing a Tylenol? That isn’t even on the table.
In Maryland, our affiliate was successful in defeating “The Emergency Pregnancy-Related Medical Conditions Act,” a bill that sought to impose the Biden Administration’s gross misinterpretation of the federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act. EMTALA was a Reagan-era law that requires emergency rooms to provide or help facilitate life-saving care to those unable to pay, including pregnant women and their unborn children. Biden-Harris turned that law on its head by requiring hospital emergency rooms to become abortion facilities.
A similar bill codifying the Biden Administration’s interpretation of EMTALA is currently moving in Connecticut. It includes even more protections for abortion providers and a “safe harbor fund” which will fund travel and lodging expenses for nonresidents seeking abortions in Connecticut.
Unfortunately, the Maryland legislature established “The Public Health Abortion Grant Program.” This publicly-funded abortion grant program takes $25 million in insurance premiums, mandated by the Affordable Care Act and intended to cover the cost of abortions for enrolled individuals, to create a new state abortion grant program. The program will subsidize the abortion industry in the form of grants that target low income mothers who are not enrolled or insured. This increases the risk of interstate abortion traffic.
Assisted Suicide:
Legislation either authorizing doctor-prescribed death or expanding on an already existing law was introduced in about 23 states. The great news is that in Maryland, doctor-prescribed suicide was defeated for the 8th year in a row. Unfortunately, in Delaware, their Governor recently signed a law legalizing doctor-prescribed death—becoming the 11th state to do so. Now doctor-prescribed death is legal in 11 states and the District of Columbia.
In Illinois, the Senate was dangerously close to advancing a bill legalizing assisted suicide. In a last-ditch effort, proponents of legalization attached this deadly amendment to a food safety bill. Luckily, the legislature adjourned before this bill could pass. In Oregon, there is a dangerous expansion of doctor-prescribed death. The new bill had a second hearing June 2. This is a death-on-demand approach which cuts the waiting period in half, requires hospitals and hospices to disclose if their facility participates in this deadly practice, and expands provisions to allow non-physicians to prescribe death.
2025 Pro-life trends and activity:
Pro-lifers were active. They passed life-affirming laws to help pregnant women in need with assistance, provided protection for Pregnancy Resource Centers or tax credits for Pregnancy Resource Centers. They passed legislation to teach prenatal/human development in schools.
Our opponents falsely asserted that pregnant women were not able to receive emergency care due to state laws protecting unborn children. In response, many states have amended their current laws protecting unborn children to clarify what a medical emergency entails. These provide clearer guidelines for medical professionals and reinforce the state’s existing abortion laws
This session, six states filed such clarification bills. It’s been enacted in Arkansas, Kentucky, and Tennessee. In Kentucky, the law explicitly protected medical treatments for miscarriage and ectopic pregnancy care, mandated the expansion of perinatal palliative care services, and established freestanding birthing centers in the state. Texas’s SB 31 reaffirms that doctors are allowed to intervene if a pregnant woman faces a life-threatening physical condition under Texas’ Pro-Life laws. The bill has been sent to the Texas Governor awaiting his signature.
The Texas Governor also has another bill recently sent to him which would include perinatal palliative care when families are given a life-threatening or life-limiting diagnosis of their unborn child. This law would provide resources for families in this challenging situation.
The Tennessee law provides a clear definition of a medical emergency and explicitly excludes mental health conditions as a valid justification for an abortion. The Medical Education Act, recently enacted in North Dakota, requires abortion providers to review state-approved materials clarifying the legal definition of a medical emergency.
Bills to teach about the baby’s development in schools were introduced in thirteen states. It was enacted in Arkansas, Florida, Idaho & Kansas. In the latter case, the legislature overrode their pro-abortion governor’s veto. While it passed both houses of the legislature in Arizona, unfortunately it was vetoed. In Iowa, it has passed both houses and is on its way to the Governor. These laws are instrumental in building a future generation of prolife advocates because it teaches them the truth about the unborn child’s humanity.
The Kansas Legislature also overrode the governor’s veto on a law that would direct courts to consider child support payments to women from the moment of conception and extend tax exemptions to parents of preborn children. The law includes a line item in the state budget that includes $3 million in funding for pregnancy resource centers and maternity homes across Kansas, a $1 million increase from previous years.
Surprisingly, their Governor signed a law that had wide bipartisan support that ensures women and families facing a prenatal or postnatal diagnosis of a chromosomal condition (such as Down syndrome) will receive accurate, up-to-date, and supportive information and resources. She also signed a law which strengthens protections for individuals with disabilities by ensuring they are not denied life-sustaining care, including food, water, and medical treatment.
This year ten states introduced bills that would provide a positive impact so mothers may choose life when faced with an unplanned pregnancy. Some of these bills also provide tax credits to organizations that offer prenatal care and support to families in need or protect pregnancy care centers (PRCs).
In Montana, a groundbreaking step was taken to safeguard the vital work of pregnancy resource centers with the enactment of the Pregnancy Center Autonomy and Rights of Expression Act. This first-of-its-kind law ensures that pregnancy centers are not compelled to provide or refer for abortions. Governor Gianforte signed the landmark legislation into law on May 1st, marking a powerful stand for the rights and integrity of life-affirming organizations.
In Oregon, the House and Senate both unanimously approved a bill to establish August 25 as “Oregon Adoption Day.” For Rep. Lucetta Elmer, the carrier and presenting sponsor of the bipartisan bill, the establishment of “Oregon Adoption Day” shines “a light on the beauty of adoption” and sends “a message to every adopted child in Oregon: You are seen. You are loved. And you matter.”
The Texas Legislature passed two bills that are currently on the Governor’s desk. One bill protects the funding that pregnancy centers receive and the other establishes educational materials about adoption for students so they’re aware of the life-affirming alternative to abortion. The Arizona legislature passed a law that would promote alternatives to abortion on a state-run website but unfortunately their Governor vetoed the measure.
Other prolife laws that have been enacted this session include conscience protection laws enacted in Idaho and Tennessee. In South Dakota, a law providing for the installation of newborn safety baby boxes was approved by their Governor.
As you can see there is no silver bullet bill that is the answer to building a pro-life America. Many pro-life laws can be used as vehicles to educate on the humanity of the unborn child. National Right to Life continues to promote effective protection of the unborn and supports laws that promote unborn life.
While there are a lot of moving parts, we will continue to play the long game so that in the end we can support mothers and their babies – loving them both.
LifeNews Note: Ingrid Duran is the state legislative director for National Right to Life.
The post Three Years After Dobbs, Some States are Fighting to Protect Babies From Abortion appeared first on LifeNews.com.
-
Site: non veni pacem
-
Site: Zero HedgeIndia Central Bank Shocks With Biggest Rate Cut Since Covid As Growth, Inflation StallTyler Durden Fri, 06/06/2025 - 13:05
India's central bank shocked markets this morning when it slashing interest rates (in a 5:1 vote) by a deeper-than-expected half a percent - the third cut in a row - and the largest rate cut since the covid crash, amid falling inflation and lower growth in Asia's third largest economy. It also spiked the amount of liquidity available in the system to kickstart moribund lending.
The repo rate - the level at which the central bank lends money to commercial banks, influencing borrowing costs for home and car loans - now stands at 5.5%, the lowest in three years, following two previous 25bps reductions in April and February.
Explaining the rationale for the cut, RBI governor Sanjay Malhotra said growth is "lower than our aspirations" and the bank felt it was "imperative to stimulate domestic consumption and investment" amid rising global uncertainties.
Data released last week showed that India's economy grew by 6.5% in the previous financial year ending March. The world's (newly) most populous country remains the world's fastest expanding major economy, although growth has sharply dropped from the 9.2% high recorded in financial year 2023-24. Meanwhile, retail prices in India have slowed faster than expected to 3.16% in April - the lowest in six years - and below the RBI's 4% target, driven down by falling food prices.
RBI has now forecast lower inflation than earlier projected for the year ahead. Inflation for Fiscal Year 2026 has been revised down to 3.7% from 4%, with Q1 (April- June) projected at just 2.9%. Growth forecast remains unchanged at 6.5%. This growth is well below the 8% growth the RBI aspires for.
There was another big surprise in today's announcement: alongside the greater than expected cut, the central bank changed its monetary policy stance from "accommodative" to "neutral", indicating that further rate cuts will depend on how India's growth-inflation dynamic evolves, a move which was viewed as hawkish, and sparking a sharp curve steepening.
The change in stance suggests the bar for further rate cuts is now higher. As the RBI noted, after 100bps of cuts since February, policy space is now limited.
However, fuller granaries due to a better-than-expected monsoon, weaker prices of commodities like oil - of which India is a net importer - as well as a strong currency are likely to help keep India's inflation in check in the months ahead, allowing the RBI to keep rates low.
The RBI also unexpectedly cut the Cash Reserve Ratio (CRR) rate starting September 2025 , which is set to release INR2.5tn into the banking system. With liquidity already in surplus, overnight rates may now move closer to the SDF, 25bps below the repo rate.
Credit growth remains weak at 9.8% YoY (vs 19.5% a year ago). The CRR cut, to be implemented in four 25bps tranches starting September, aims to improve credit transmission. The Governor noted that announcing the schedule in advance is meant to reassure banks of the RBI’s commitment to supporting liquidity
Some more details from Goldman Sachs:
- Policy rate - lowered by 50bp with a 5:1 vote: The RBI MPC voted 5:1 to lower the policy repo rate by 50bp to 5.50% at the June meeting, vs. an expectation of a 25bp repo rate cut. External Member Bhattacharya voted for a 25bp repo rate cut. Consequently, both the marginal standing facility (MSF) rate and the standing deposit facility (SDF) rate were lowered by 50bp each to 5.75% and 5.25%, respectively.
- Policy stance changed to 'neutral': The MPC changed its policy stance back to 'neutral' from 'accommodative'. The Governor clarified that "after having reduced the policy repo rate by 100 bps in quick succession since February 2025, under the current circumstances, monetary policy is left with very limited space to support growth". We interpret this as the end of the current rate easing cycle with repo rate at 5.50% -- implying ~1% real policy rate on a one-year forward inflation forecast. The RBI may not want the ex-ante real rate below 1%, in our view, especially when the growth outlook is balanced. We had been forecasting a 5.50% repo rate marking the end of the cycle, with 25bp rate cuts each in June and August meetings, but the RBI got there a meeting faster than we expected.
- Growth forecast retained at 6.5% yoy for FY26: The RBI retained their growth forecast at 6.5% yoy for FY26 (GSe: 6.2% yoy), noting strong agricultural sector growth and rural demand, and a resilient services sector underpinning a recovery in urban demand. However, the Governor highlighted downside risks to growth from US "reciprocal" tariff-related uncertainty and prolonged geopolitical tensions.
- Inflation forecast lowered by 30bp to 3.7% yoy for FY26: The RBI lowered its inflation forecast by 30bp to 3.7% yoy (GSe: 3.6% yoy) (Exhibit 1). The Governor highlighted that there is “greater confidence of headline inflation remaining below the target of 4% over the course of the year”. Food inflation is likely to remain benign given higher wheat and pulses (legumes) production. Additionally, Indian Meteorological Department’s expectations of an above-normal monsoon bode well for the production of summer crops. However, the Governor also highlighted upside risks to the inflation outlook from weather and US “reciprocal” tariff-related uncertainty.
- Banking system liquidity: The RBI announced a cut in the cash reserve ratio (CRR) of 100bp to 3.0% of net demand and time liabilities (NDTL) in four tranches from September to November to ease banking system liquidity further. As per the RBI’s estimate, this measure is expected to release durable liquidity of INR 2.5tn (0.7% of GDP) into the banking system.
- The Governor said that the RBI “remains committed to provide sufficient liquidity to the banking system". With durable liquidity already in surplus in recent months, overnight rates have traded on an average ~20bp below the repo rate from April to June (Exhibit 2), resulting in a significant easing in financial conditions. As a result, overnight rates have come off by more than 150bp from mid-January to now.
India's lower borrowing costs will have a positive growth impact due to improved purchasing power for households, lower input costs for companies and lower debt servicing costs for the government. They will also help homebuyers and a struggling real estate sector.
"This effectively lowers the cost of borrowing, making home loan EMIs [mortgage payments] easier on the pocket and thereby directly improving affordability for buyers. This can potentially boost demand in the Indian real estate sector, especially in affordable and mid-income segments. Affordable housing faced the sharpest pandemic fallout, with sales and new launches shrinking in the top 7 cities," Anuj Puri, chairman of ANAROCK Group, said.
Predictably, Indian markets rallied sharply post the rate cut announcement.
Looking ahead, Goldman expects the RBI to stay on hold for the rest of the year unless growth slows sharply. The front end of the IGB curve should remain supported by strong liquidity and favorable demand-supply dynamics. The bank favors 2Y IGB and expect the IGB curve to steepen.
-
Site: Mises InstituteAt first glance, it might seem extreme—even offensive—to compare anti-fossil fuel climate policies to Stalin’s deliberate starvation of millions during the Holodomor. But in truth, the comparison may be unfair— to Stalin.
-
Site: LifeNews
The last 10 years or so have witnessed numerous momentous changes in American culture. One of the biggest was this: the normalization and celebration of “Pride Month.”
After years of feeling like strangers in our own land, things have shifted. Numerous corporations and organizations that used to shout their praise of Pride Month to the skies have gone quiet regarding it. They are not using a Pride logo online. They are not bankrolling Pride events. Instead of promoting radical gender ideology and pagan sexuality, they seem to have returned to what they are ostensibly in business to do: selling computers, hairdryers, and lawnmowers. What a wild idea for a company!
We believers can give thanks to God for this cultural shift. Yet we need not stop there. In June, instead of recognizing Pride Month, we can celebrate “Family Month.” Rep. Mary Miller (R-Ill.) has indeed introduced a resolution to declare the month of June as Family Month. We can do so because God loves the family. God made the family the foundational building block of society, forming it before any other institution (Genesis 2). It is not the government that gives stability to a nation; it is the family that forms the social concrete of a thriving country.
SUPPORT LIFENEWS! If you want to help fight abortion, please donate to LifeNews.com!
Despite many attacks, the family is alive. God’s design is not defeated. For the reasons sketched here, it makes sense to celebrate June as Family Month.
Honoring God in the Simple Things
We need not do so in an obnoxious way. We can do so in a deeply grateful way. The little things matter in this regard: playing catch. Going on walks. Putting away phones for extended dinner conversation. Reading “The Chronicles of Narnia” together at night. Serving the church together. Going on a fun family trip and eating ice cream. Most of life’s greatest joys, we recall, are found in life’s quietest moments.
Of course, Family Month ought not to create barriers between married Christians and single Christians. The church is, in ultimate terms, the true family of God. We are one “household” in Christ (Ephesians 2:11-22). The natural family points us to the greater family, the family of God from every tribe, tongue, nation, and people group.
Family Month can be a great time to pray over how to strengthen families in America. One of every three children in America is born out of wedlock. Broken families have proliferated. Fathers are struggling. Even Christians who honor God’s design of the family may have experienced not abiding joy in their home environment, but chaos and pain. Much as we thank God for his gifts, we also soberly recognize that not every home was or is a happy one.
Because of this, we need to do all we can to rebuild and strengthen the natural family. There are no easy fixes here, but Christians ought to be a bold and loving voice in this country for the reviving of the American home. So many of the battles we fight in the public square are won or lost in the life of the family, after all.
Pride Will Not Last (but Thankfulness Will)
Whatever comes of our efforts, we can continue to champion a better way than the way of Pride. In the end, this is the choice before us: either pride (in ourselves) or thankfulness (to God). We must choose well here, for pride has a shelf life. It is very powerful for a time, but it will not last. It will be wiped from the face of the earth when the Son of God puts the world to rights (Revelation 20).
Gratitude — for all of God’s wonderful gifts, including the family — will last forever, however. For all eternity to come, we will praise God for his kindness to sinners like us. We will do so, many of us, with members of our own family, for the family has proven so influential for many of us in Christian discipleship. But even more than our natural ties, we will praise the slain Lamb with our broader family, the people of God, in the new heavens and new earth.
These truths are worth defending and proclaiming even if they are unpopular with some. Yet we do not stop there. We celebrate the family. No matter what our society chooses to label June, now or in the coming days, we can say to one another, a grateful smile on our face:
Happy Family Month.
LifeNews Note: Owen Strachan is Senior Fellow for FRC’s Center for Biblical Worldview.
The post Family Month is Beginning to Replace Pride Month appeared first on LifeNews.com.
-
Site: AsiaNews.itOn the eve of the Eid al-Adha holiday, Israel launched one of its most impressive attacks. Aoun tried in vain to stop the military operation while Israel's Defence Minister issued new threats. Hezbollah is using Iranian-style "slow diplomacy". Impatience is growing in Israel over US policies in the region.
-
Site: AsiaNews.itOn the eve of their Jubilee at Pentecost, Pope Leo XIV met in the Vatican with the leaders of international associations and groups of believers recognised by the Holy See. 'God raises up charisms: to awaken in hearts a desire to encounter Christ,' he said, while at the same time, urging them to be 'a leaven of unity, communion, and fraternity in our world, so torn by discord and violence.'
-
Site: LifeNews
Chilean President Gabriel Boric’s push to legalize abortion on demand through 14 weeks of pregnancy, announced in his final annual address to the nation, is a reckless attempt to salvage a faltering and disastrous administration with a polarizing issue. Having failed to deliver on tax reform and with two failed and rejected attempts at constitutional overhaul on the issue of abortion behind him, Boric’s new abortion push is a last-ditch bid to build his “progressive legacy,” whatever that means. But what he proposes is not progress; it is a step backward for women, children, and public health.
Chile has long been cited as an international example for maternal health. After protective abortion laws were reinforced in 1989, maternal mortality continued to decline dramatically. According to a comprehensive 2012 study published in the peer-reviewed journal PLoS ONE, Chile experienced a sustained drop in maternal mortality even as abortion was restricted, ultimately reaching one of the lowest maternal mortality rates in the world.
The study, authored by Dr. Elard Koch and a team of epidemiologists, analyzed 50 years of maternal health data. It concluded that the key factors in lowering maternal mortality were advances in education for women, access to prenatal care, skilled birth attendance, emergency obstetric care, and clean water, not legal abortion. Their research debunked the myth that legalized abortion is necessary to safeguard maternal health.
SUPPORT LIFENEWS! If you want to help fight abortion, please donate to LifeNews.com!
President Boric’s bill is not driven by public demand or public health need. Polling shows that 55% of Chileans want to keep the current legislation, which permits abortion only in limited cases, including a risk to the mother’s life. Only 25% support Boric’s extreme expansion. Yet his administration presses forward, cheered on by global abortion lobbies and fringe activist organizations, rather than the Chilean public.
What happens in Chile matters far beyond its borders. Regional pro-abortion zealots are increasingly organizing transnationally, attempting to force ideological shifts across the Global South. Chile’s current law stands as a powerful rebuttal to this narrative and as a reminder that safeguarding life does not mean endangering women.
President Boric has framed this bill as a question of democratic debate. But democracy is not defined by the ability to end innocent lives. It is measured by how a nation protects its most vulnerable. In Chile, this includes the unborn child.
This is not about left or right, Catholic or secular. It is about truth and dignity. A Chile that continues to honor both mother and child offers hope—not only for its citizens, but for a world increasingly tempted to solve complex human problems with lethal simplicity.
Let Chile remain a light in the hemisphere. Let it continue to lead by example, rather than following a destructive trend. In the end, true progress does not come from eliminating life’s most vulnerable—it comes from protecting them.
LifeNews.com Note: Raimundo Rojas is the director of Outreach Director for the National Right to Life Committee. He is a former president of Florida Right to Life and has presented the pro-life message to millions in Spanish-language media outlets. He represents NRLC at the United Nations as an NGO. Rojas was born in Santiago de las Vegas, Havana, Cuba and he and his family escaped to the United States in 1968.
The post Chilean President Gabriel Boric Wants to Legalize Abortion on Demand appeared first on LifeNews.com.
-
Site: Zero HedgeMay Payrolls Rise By 139K, Beating Estimates, But Report Shows Sweeping Labor Market WeaknessTyler Durden Fri, 06/06/2025 - 11:33
With the jobs whisper number of 110K flirting dangerously close with a sub 100K print, one which both JPM and Goldman said could spark a waterfall selloff in stocks, moments ago the BLS reported that in May the worst case scenario was averted, with the US adding a modest 139K, which while below last month's print, was above the median consensus of 126K, and well inside the estimated range of 75K to 190K.
That was the good news; the bad news is virtually all historical data points during the Trump admin were revised lower, with April revised 30K lower from 177K to 147K, and March revised 65K lower from 185K to 120K. Worse, every single month under the Trump admin has been revised lower.
Turning to the unemployment rate, there were no surprises here: consensus expected an unchanged 4.2% print from April, and got just that. The unemployment rate has so far held at 4.2 percent in May and has remained in a narrow range of 4.0% to 4.2% since May 2024. The number of unemployed people, at 7.2 million, changed little over the month.
Among the major worker groups, the unemployment rates for adult men (3.9 percent), adult women (3.9 percent), teenagers (13.4 percent), Whites (3.8 percent), Blacks (6.0 percent), Asians (3.6 percent), and Hispanics (5.1 percent) showed little or no change over the month.
The unemployment rate was the result of a modest increase in the number of unemployed people (from 7.166 million to 7.237 million) while the labor force declined by ~600K, from 171.135 million to 170.510 million. More importantly, the disconnect between the Household survey and Establishment survey is back, as the number of employed workers plunged tumbled by 696K, even as payrolls reportedly rose.
Some more qualitative details from the report:
- The number of people jobless less than 5 weeks increased by 264,000 to 2.5 million in May. The number of long-term unemployed (those jobless for 27 weeks or more) decreased over the month by 218,000 to 1.5 million. Both measures were little changed over the year. The long-term unemployed accounted for 20.4 percent of all unemployed people in May.
- In May, the employment-population ratio declined by 0.3 percentage point to 59.7 percent. The labor force participation rate decreased by 0.2 percentage point to 62.4 percent.
- The number of people employed part time for economic reasons, at 4.6 million, changed little in May. These individuals would have preferred full-time employment but were working part time because their hours had been reduced or they were unable to find full-time jobs.
- In May, the number of people not in the labor force who currently want a job was little changed at 6.0 million. These individuals were not counted as unemployed because they were not actively looking for work during the 4 weeks preceding the survey or were unavailable to take a job.
- Among those not in the labor force who wanted a job, the number of people marginally attached to the labor force, at 1.6 million, changed little in May. These individuals wanted and were available for work and had looked for a job sometime in the prior 12 months but had not looked for work in the 4 weeks preceding the survey. The number of discouraged workers, a subset of the marginally attached who believed that no jobs were
Next, turning to earnings, we find that May average hourly earnings actually printed stronger than expected, rising 0.4% MoM, double the 0.2% expected, and up from the 0.2% in April. On an annual basis, earnings rose 3.9%, also above the 3.7% consensus, and unchanged from the upward revised April print of 3.9%.
Average hourly earnings for all employees on private nonfarm payrolls rose by 15 cents, or 0.4 percent, to $36.24 in May. Over the past 12 months, average hourly earnings have increased by 3.9 percent. In May, average hourly earnings of private-sector production and nonsupervisory employees rose by 12 cents, or 0.4 percent, to $31.18.
There were also no surprises in the number of hours worked: In May, the average workweek for all employees on private nonfarm payrolls was 34.3 hours for the third month in a row. In manufacturing, the average workweek was little changed at 40.1 hours, and overtime was unchanged at 2.9 hours. The average workweek for production and nonsupervisory employees on private nonfarm payrolls remained at 33.7 hours in May.
Here is the breakdown of jobs by industry:
- Health care added 62,000 jobs in May, higher than the average monthly gain of 44,000 over the prior 12 months. In May, job gains occurred in hospitals (+30,000), ambulatory health care services (+29,000), and skilled nursing care facilities (+6,000).
- Employment in leisure and hospitality continued to trend up in May (+48,000), largely in food services and drinking places (+30,000). Over the prior 12 months, leisure and hospitality had added an average of 20,000 jobs per month.
- In May, social assistance employment continued to trend up (+16,000), reflecting continued growth in individual and family services (+16,000).
- Federal government employment continued to decline in May (-22,000) and is down by 59,000 since January. (Employees on paid leave or receiving ongoing severance pay are counted as employed in the establishment survey.)
Employment showed little change over the month in other major industries, including mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction; construction; manufacturing; wholesale trade; retail trade; transportation and warehousing; information; financial activities; professional and business services; and other services.
Last but not least, there was acute softness in both the breakdown between full and part-time workers, where the former tumbled by 623K and the latter increased by 33K
Finally, the number of native-born workers tumbled by 444K, while foreign-born workers also dropped by 224K, and easing back from the record set two months ago.
Overall, this was a poor jobs report if one ignores the headline which will surely be revised to a sub-100K print in the next month or two.
-
Site: Zero HedgeHighs And LowsTyler Durden Fri, 06/06/2025 - 11:25
By Elwin de Groot, head of macro strategy at Rabobank
Highs and Lows
Bond yields were up some 5 basis points globally whilst the euro made a slight reversal after having pushed for a near high of 1.15 as the ECB concluded its press conference. From a ‘low’ inspired by 50% tariffs on US steel and aluminium imports going ‘live’ earlier this week and growing concerns about the US economy and the labor market, sentiment in financial markets briefly swung back to a ‘high’ as President Donald Trump said he had a “very good phone call” with Chinese President Xi Jinping. Gains in equity markets were modest but still good enough for S&P500 to extend its rally to 20% from its 8 April low. That is, before the falling-out between Trump and Musk reached a boiling point on social media. Enough is being written about that right now, so we’ll leave you at it.
After the call with Xi, Trump said that both leaders have agreed to further talks and that there “should no longer be any questions respectively the complexity of Rare Earth products”. That’s up for various interpretations, but it suggests China has offered to speed up its process of lifting its export restrictions. Still, the Chinese readout of the call, unsurprisingly, was more nuanced and said that Xi had urged Trump to remove “negative” measures that have affected trade between the countries in recent months. The upshot, from the market’s perspective is that both sides are, at least, talking and that holds the prospect of further progress in removing some (still very high) tariffs. But, just for balance, Commerce Secretary Lutnick yesterday called for increased enforcement of US export controls on technology, warning that China was “only attacking great American companies.” If President Xi was referring to those export controls with “negative measures”, the market’s positive assessment may be, well, too high.
That further talks with the US can lead to a ‘deal’ (as Keir Starmer can confirm), a stalemate (see EU-US) or a major escalation, as Zelensky can attest, is on any global leader’s mind. Nikkei Asia reports that US negotiators Bessent, Lutnick and Greer keep Japan guessing. “At one point the three cabinet officials put the talks with the Japanese side on hold an began debating right in front of them”, a source tells the Nikkei. In that sense, German Chancellor Merz came away nicely after a 40-minute meeting in the Oval Office, as he let Trump do most of the talking. Little concrete came from that meeting, though Trump acknowledged the ramp-up in German defense spending.
Trade data are going from lows to highs as well, which in some cases makes the Covid-episode data look pale. As the Commerce Department confirmed, the US trade deficit for April shrunk by the most on record, to $61.6bn from $138.3bn in March, driven by the largest-ever decline in imports.
Frontloading in the run-up the tariffs clearly was massive and then collapsed. This also suggests that after its big negative contribution to US GDP growth in Q1 it will be a significant positive factor in Q2. Inventory effects will likely attenuate some of its effect. Bloomberg noted that a drop in imports of pharmaceuticals from Ireland was responsible for an almost $20bn swing in the deficit. The opposite (statistical) effect is thus going to be seen in Europe in Q2. Ireland yesterday reported a significant upward revision in Q1 GDP (which now points to a revision in Eurozone GDP growth to around +0.6% q/q (!) from 0.3% previously). But this will obviously turn to a significant drag in Q2 as those US trade numbers for April just signaled.
Staying in Europe, the ECB seemingly presented itself as an anchor of stability in these times of highs and lows. Lagarde’s new mantra is now “well positioned”, which could be viewed in our opinion as code language for “we’re done cutting, unless…”. This becomes even clearer when you compare it to the previous mantra Lagarde introduced in March when she called ECB policy “meaningfully less restrictive”. We had expected little to no guidance from yesterday’s policy meeting, but these new words – despite lower oil prices and a stronger euro – lead us to maintain our view that we have reached the terminal rate.
However, the ECB leaves ample room to respond if things do not work out the way they envisage. Indeed, it lowered its inflation forecast significantly with core inflation positioned around 2% for the coming years. Moreover, its new scenario analyses unveiled a dovish reaction function to a potential escalation of trade tensions. Should this happen, and paused tariffs were to be reinstated, the ECB’s economists estimate that this could lower GDP growth through 2027 by about 1% cumulatively. And, interestingly, they conclude that inflation would be somewhat lower as well: in such a scenario inflation would average 1.8% in 2027, and that includes the assumption that the EU retaliates. By contrast, our own econometric analysis indicates that European tariffs on the US would be (mildly) inflationary instead.
Lagarde did say that their modelling exercise assumed that higher tariffs could lead to lower demand for euro area exports and to countries with overcapacity rerouting their exports to the euro area thereby putting more downward pressure on inflation. However, she acknowledged that the ECB’s analysis did not include any inflationary impact from a disruption of supply chains. Although this effect, admittedly, is surrounded by even more uncertainty, we did take this into account in our own scenario analysis (which explains why we still have inflation somewhat above the ECB’s target even in 2026). And one only need to take a quick glance at container freight rates (benchmark composite by WCI up by a staggering 175% compared to last month) to understand why be believe the ECB the ECB could be under-estimating the potential highs.
Time will tell, of course. But one thing that the ECB may be right about, is the (initial) downward pressure on imported goods prices due to a diversion of trade. The European Commission yesterday published its first assessment from its trade diversion monitoring tool that was launched in April. The early warning system tracks shipments and prices of goods at a high level of detail. In the short-run lower prices may benefit European importers and thereby consumers, but if those prices are the result of overcapacity in other parts of the world (such as China) this could also undermine European producers. The South China Morning Post reported that “in the month to May 25, imports of light-emitting diodes surged 156 per cent, while their price fell 65 per cent. Shipments of industrial robots shot up by 315 per cent, paired with a 35 per cent price decline. And imports of some bars and rods made from steel alloy soared by over 1,000 per cent as their price plunged 86 per cent.”
Whilst such figures can be extremely volatile due to their level of detail, seasonal patterns etc. and make no distinction between the origin of the content, a heatmap by the Commission shows that China was a significant contributor to these changes. The FT writes that the surge in steel imports, driven by trade diversion, is setting off alarm bells in the steel sector. Forecasting the next steps by the European Commission is a rather speculative affair, but we’d not be surprised if this leads to some form of action. This year the Commission has already launched more than 10 cases against China and/or Chinese producers (based on our count of news articles on the EU’s trade defense website).
-
Site: LES FEMMES - THE TRUTH
-
Site: Zero HedgeUkraine Scores More Hits On Airbase, Defense Factories Deep Inside RussiaTyler Durden Fri, 06/06/2025 - 11:05
Ukraine overnight targeted key Russian sites with more drone attacks, while simultaneously Russian cruise missiles were fired against Kiev and other regions of Ukraine, killing at least four and wounding twenty in the Ukrainian capital.
"Kyiv came under another attack involving drones and ballistic missiles. Rescuers are responding to the aftermath at several locations across the city," the State Emergency Service of Ukraine announced on Telegram. Russia allegedly fired over 400 projectiles into Ukraine, though most were said to be downed by air defenses. On the other side, two airbases, a fuel depot and aviation were reportedly struck deep in Russia overnight.
Aftermath of Russian air strike in Kyiv on June 6, 2025, AFP
"A successful strike was carried out on the Engels airfield in the Saratov region, a place where enemy aircraft are concentrated," Ukraine’s General Staff said in a statement, in reference to the Engels-2 base which lies roughly 500 kilometers (300 miles) east of the Ukrainian border,
Several fuel tanks at the base were set ablaze, which dramatic images appeared to show following "multiple hits" on the site, per Ukrainian military statements.
Additionally, in the Ryazan Region, Ukraine said it targeted the Dyagilevo airbase, which supports Russian missile operations. The regional governor said the incoming drones were downed by anti-air defense systems.
And in the Tambov Region, drones reportedly targeted a high-tech aviation and missile control systems plant in Michurinsk. Ukrainian sources allege the plant is a military-industrial site, producing components for Russian missile and artillery systems.
Russian military-industrial complex attacked
One Ukrainian analyst describes the Tambov plant as follows: "Through facilities like this, Russia maintains serial production of Hyacinth, Msta, Tornado, and even components for Iskander missiles."
The analyst further says "the Progress plant is one of the key enterprises in Russia’s military-industrial complex, and its destruction represents a significant blow to the country’s defense production. This involves the loss of key components that power the military's missile and artillery systems."
BREAKING:
— Visegrád 24 (@visegrad24) June 6, 2025
Ukraine launches huge drone swarm attack against military targets across Russia:
- Fuel depot of the Engels Air Base hit
- Dyagilevo Air Base hit
- Military electronics plant in Tambov hit
- Bryansk Airport hit
+ Podolsk near Moscow & Crimea pic.twitter.com/bC15Tgop94Clearly Russia's anti-air defense systems have been struggling to thwart these now nightly waves of drone swarms. Likely Russia will continue stepping up its major aerial assaults on Ukraine in retaliation.
-
Site: LifeNews
Texas Senator Ted Cruz is making a bold move to honor preborn babies — by officially designating June as “Life Month.”
Cruz introduced a new resolution to honor the anniversary of the Supreme Court’s monumental decision to overturn Roe v. Wade in 2022 — a ruling that sent shockwaves across the country and empowered states to protect preborn children once again. Texas led the charge, becoming the first state to ban abortion.
Now, Cruz wants to ensure we never forget this turning point.
“Every human life is worthy of protection, and it is especially incumbent upon Americans and lawmakers to protect the most vulnerable among us,” Cruz said in a statement.
SUPPORT LIFENEWS! If you want to help fight abortion, please donate to LifeNews.com!
Momentum for this idea is growing. In the House of Representatives, Rep. Chris Smith (R-NJ) introduced a similar resolution and delivered a powerful call for the nation to face the reality of abortion.
“For decades abortion advocates have gone to extraordinary lengths to ignore, trivialize, and cover up the battered baby victim, fostering a culture of denial, disrespect, and bias against the unborn,” Smith said.
“This resolution designating June as Life Month highlights our moral imperative to protect innocent children’s lives from extermination. It calls our nation to reject willful blindness to the realities of abortion—brutally dismembering helpless babies with sharp knife-like curettes or poisoning babies with pills that literally starve them to death and often result in their bodies being flushed down a toilet. This resolution affirms that the cruel injustice of abortion need not be forever: instead, we must defend the unborn and show love and compassion to both mother and child through meaningful assistance and support.”
And the need for this couldn’t be clearer. In 2023 alone, Planned Parenthood committed over 402,000 abortions — its highest number ever. That’s more than 1,100 babies lost every single day. One in five people who walk into a Planned Parenthood choose abortion.
If passed, this resolution would give Americans a powerful opportunity every June to celebrate the value of every life — and remind the nation that the fight to protect the most vulnerable is far from over.
Cruz remains committed to seeing this through:
“Designating June as Life Month is a recommitment to the American principle that every life has dignity,” he emphasized once again. “I call on my colleagues in the Senate to swiftly pass this resolution.”LifeNews Note: Ashlynn Lemos is the communications intern for Texas Right to Life.
The post Ted Cruz Condemns Abortion: “Every Life is Worthy of Protection” appeared first on LifeNews.com.
-
Site: Zero HedgeFeds Say California Bullet Train Has 'No Viable Path', Threaten To Pull $4 BillionTyler Durden Fri, 06/06/2025 - 10:45
Authored by Chase Smith via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),
California’s long-delayed high-speed rail project is in default of federal grant agreements and may soon lose more than $4 billion in funding, the U.S. Department of Transportation said on June 4.
A report released by the department accuses the California High-Speed Rail Authority (CHSRA) of chronic mismanagement, unrealistic projections, and failure to meet key obligations, despite receiving billions in taxpayer money.
The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) concluded that the bullet train has “no viable path” to finish the project’s first operational segment by 2033, the deadline outlined in federal agreements.
In a letter to Ian Choudri, CHSRA’s CEO, the FRA stated that the agency intends to terminate two grants totaling roughly $4 billion unless California responds with a satisfactory corrective plan. CHSRA has up to 37 days to avoid a final termination.
The letter outlines nine key findings from a 310-page compliance review, including a $7 billion funding gap, missed procurement deadlines, and what the FRA referred to as “substantially overrepresented” ridership forecasts.
The FRA letter called the rail project “a story of broken promises and of waste of Federal taxpayer dollars.” It noted that what began as a proposed 800-mile system was “first reduced to 500 miles, then became a 171-mile segment, and is now very likely ended as a 119-mile track to nowhere.”
Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said the report justifies reprogramming the funds to other projects.
“This report exposes a cold, hard truth: CHSRA has no viable path to complete this project on time or on budget,” Duffy said in a statement.
“CHSRA is on notice—If they can’t deliver on their end of the deal, it could soon be time for these funds to flow to other projects that can achieve President Trump’s vision of building great, big, beautiful things again. Our country deserves high-speed rail that makes us proud—not boondoggle trains to nowhere.”
The FRA report found that CHSRA has not yet laid a single mile of high-speed rail track, despite more than $6.9 billion in total federal funding since 2009. It also said that CHSRA continues to rely on unstable funding sources, such as California’s cap-and-trade auction revenues, to fill budget gaps.
According to the FRA, CHSRA has already spent about $1.6 billion on change orders over the past two years and still faces legal disputes and procurement delays and hasn’t started construction on key segments.
The state originally promised an 800-mile rail line connecting San Francisco and Los Angeles by 2020 for $33 billion. Estimates now range from $89 billion to $128 billion.
In a statement last month, CHSRA said construction is active on 119 miles in the Central Valley and has created more than 15,000 jobs. The agency also said it was making progress on a 171-mile segment from Merced to Bakersfield.
But FRA officials say even that scaled-back version may be unreachable. The agency noted that CHSRA’s internal inspector general found no credible plan to close the current $7 billion gap for the Merced-Bakersfield stretch.
A CHSRA Authority spokesperson told The Epoch Times in an email that they “strongly disagree” with the FRA’s conclusions, which they said are “misguided and do not reflect the substantial progress made to deliver high-speed rail in California.”
“We remain firmly committed to completing the nation’s first true high-speed rail system connecting the major population centers in the state,” the spokesperson said. “While continued federal partnership is important to the project, the majority of our funding has been provided by the state. To that end, the Governor’s budget proposal, which is currently before the Legislature, extends at least $1 billion per year in funding for the next 20 years, providing the necessary resources to complete the project’s initial operating segment. The Authority will fully address and correct the record in our formal response to the FRA’s notice.”
The compliance review concluded that continued federal support would not achieve the goals of the High-Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Program. The FRA said it may redirect unspent funds from the grants to other infrastructure projects and is not currently seeking repayment of the funds already used.
Reuters contributed to this report.
-
Site: Zero HedgeThe Day After: Trump 'Not Interested' In Talking As Musk Continues To Make Case Against BBBTyler Durden Fri, 06/06/2025 - 10:25
After Thursday's grand meltdown between Elon Musk and President Donald Trump over the Big Beautiful Bill, it looked like things were set to simmer down - with Musk posting several things on X that suggested he was open to a path forward, while the Trump White House had scheduled a call with Musk, Politico reported.
On Friday morning, however, it was clear that Trump isn't ready to mend fences - he doesn't want to talk to Musk, and is looking to sell his Tesla - while Musk spent the morning (so far) making clear that Congress needs to fix government spending or America is going to be in a world of hurt.
"I’m not even thinking about Elon. He’s got a problem. The poor guy’s got a problem," Trump told CNN in a brief phone call. When asked if he had a call with Musk, Trump replied "No. I won’t be speaking to him for a while I guess, but I wish him well."
To recap:
- Earlier in the week, Musk came out against the 'Big Beautiful Bill' - which raises the debt ceiling by $5 trillion, and either raises the deficit by $2.4 trillion, or lowers it by $1.4 trillion - depending on who you believe, and fails to address any of the waste, fraud and abuse found by DOGE.
- Thursday morning, Trump was asked about Musk's opposition to the bill, telling reporters on Thursday that he's 'very disappointed in Elon,' and that Musk only opposes the bill because they eliminated electric vehicle tax credits from it.
- Trump then suggested he might pull government funding from Musk's companies such as SpaceX, which owns the only operational US spacecraft capable of transporting astronauts to and from the International Space Station.
"The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon’s Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn’t do it!" -President Donald Trump via Truth Social
- Musk went ballistic - announcing he would 'immediately' decommission the Dragon program (which he later walked back Thursday night), proposed a new political party (that's still his pinned post on X), endorsed another Trump impeachment, and said Trump is 'in the Epstein files,' which is why they haven't been released.
Peacemakers emerged - such as former State Department official Mike Benz, who defended Musk and called for the two to patch things up...
Elon Was Always The Secret Weapon Behind Trump 2.0 pic.twitter.com/ii1HBqTKza
— Mike Benz (@MikeBenzCyber) June 6, 2025While two attorneys associated with the Epstein case(s) flatly denied Trump had anything to do with Epstein's sex-trafficking operation.
Just confirming what we already knew. pic.twitter.com/ooZNVwHsjn
— C3 (@C_3C_3) June 6, 2025“The only thing that I can say about President Trump is that he is the only person who, in 2009... is the only person who picked up the phone and said, let’s just talk."
— Kyle Becker (@kylenabecker) June 6, 2025
"[Trump] was very helpful... and gave no indication whatsoever that he was involved in anything untoward… pic.twitter.com/u0FKJrWKejOn Friday, Musk re-posted the following posts and clips making his case;
"The Federal Government today pays more in interest on the debt than we do in budget for the Department of Defense. We pay $1.2B a year in JUST interest on debt. Total government spending is about $7T. Interest payments are $1.2T. DOD is $800B a year. Total debt is $35T and it… pic.twitter.com/fPg3Xo5dkZ
— Tesla Owners Silicon Valley (@teslaownersSV) June 6, 2025Jesse Watters: “The media said that Musk was the co-president… The media said Trump was doing favors for Elon Musk. Well, if you look at this big, beautiful bill, there’s no favors for Elon Musk in it at all”
— Defiant L’s (@DefiantLs) June 5, 2025
pic.twitter.com/9Py3TM5ZklIt’s a borrowing limit. It’s not a function / it’s a rule violated by a weak Congress regularly… https://t.co/4KEkl8aIKz
— Chip Roy (@chiproytx) June 5, 2025This is why Republicans will likely lose the House in 2026 and then Democrats will spend two years investigating and impeaching President Trump.
— Wall Street Mav (@WallStreetMav) June 5, 2025
Trump and the Republicans in Congress need to deliver. We want budget cuts. We want agencies shut down. We don't want big govt. https://t.co/3T3uheQEyfWhile Trump (as noted above) isn't ready to have a phone call with Musk to hash things out.
Meanwhile, DOGE chief architect Joel Fishback slammed Musk and said he's stepping away from the effort following Musk's comments, Politico reports.
"The truth is that Elon set expectations that he relayed to the president, me, and the country that he did not come close to fulfilling. That’s disappointing, but okay," said Fishback. "What’s not okay is his baseless personal attacks against President Trump."
To be continued...
-
Site: Zero HedgeRate-Cut Odds Plunge After Payrolls Beat; Trump Demands "Full Point Cut" From PowellTyler Durden Fri, 06/06/2025 - 10:20
A better than expected headline payrolls print has sparked a surge in stocks and bond yields this morning as the long-await (and hoped for by some) recessionary collapse in the labor market remains elusive.
Even if below the surface things are not so healthy, rate-cut expectations for 2025 have plunged to less than two total cuts (2026 expectations up marginally)...
Never one to miss an opportunity - even on a day when he should probably take a break from social media - President Trump dropped some more advice for Fed Chair Powell:
Strong unemployment, falling inflation, and no signs (except in partisan survey responses) of economic weakness from Trump's tariff-nado. One has to wonder what it is that Powell is waiting for... unlike in September of last year?
Finally, one thought - is this Trump pivoting his rage from Musk to Powell - a far easier, and less wealthy, opposition.
-
Site: AsiaNews.itThe state government wants to arm only indigenous people for self-defence. For BJP Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma, such a step is justified on security grounds, while the opposition sees the attempt to provide weapons to some communities as exacerbating tensions with Bengali Muslims.
-
Site: LifeNews
No parent ever wants to hear these words at an ultrasound: “Your baby may not survive.”
When doctors deliver a life-limiting diagnosis for a preborn child, families are often devastated—and pressured into abortion, with little guidance on choosing Life.
Now, Texas is changing that.
In a major step toward building a more compassionate, Pro-Life culture, state lawmakers passed the Perinatal Palliative Care Act during the 2025 legislative session. Senate Bill 1233 by Senator Kelly Hancock (R–North Richland Hills) and Representative Valoree Swanson (R–Spring) ensures that families receive real information and resources—not silence or pressure.
Prenatal tests indicate possible health issues in 2–3% of pregnancies, but up to 85% of those results are false. Most parents aren’t told that—and tragically, up to 90% of these babies are aborted. Only 19% of women are informed about specialized care options. Every baby deserves dignity, no matter the diagnosis.
SUPPORT LIFENEWS! If you want to help fight abortion, please donate to LifeNews.com!
Perinatal palliative care offers compassionate support to families after a baby is diagnosed in the womb with a serious or life-threatening condition. Care begins at diagnosis and continues until the baby’s first birthday, even if the little one does not make it that long. It includes medical, emotional, spiritual, and practical support from a team of specialists, religious counselors, and community support providers. SB 1233 clarifies that this never includes acts done to cause or hasten the baby’s death.
The law does this by connecting families to nonprofits like Abel Speaks, which walks alongside them through these heartbreaking circumstances.
God created us for community—especially in our hardest moments. The Perinatal Palliative Care Act ensures every family facing a difficult diagnosis receives the guidance and resources they need to love and care for their child, no matter how short that little Life may be.
Too often, families are told abortion is the only “reasonable” response. This law changes that. Texas now affirms: every life has value, no matter how brief or fragile.
One young mother’s story illustrates why this matters.
At her 21-week ultrasound, Ava Trammell was told her baby girl was “incompatible with Life.” Doctors gave her no real options—just a suggestion to fly to Colorado for an abortion or continue the pregnancy without support.
But, Ava chose Life.
“I know she’s not going to survive,” Ava said, “but I only have so much time with her. Why would I cut it any shorter? She’s safe in my womb… she only knows love and doesn’t know pain. Why would I give her such a painful death when she’s perfectly fine with me?”
Because of SB 1233, future mothers like Ava won’t have to face that decision alone.
This law embodies what it means to be truly Pro-Life: walking with families in both joy and sorrow. By equipping parents with life-affirming options and emotional care, Texas is saying clearly: we value every life, and we will walk with every family.
We are deeply grateful to Senator Hancock and Representative Swanson and their teams for standing up for the most vulnerable and helping families meet unimaginable challenges with dignity, compassion, and hope.
LifeNews Note: Ashlynn Lemos is the communications intern for Texas Right to Life.
The post 85% of Prenatal Tests are Wrong, 90% of Those Babies are Aborted appeared first on LifeNews.com.
-
Site: Ron Paul Institute for Peace And Prosperity
What has happened to Europe? Why is its rhetoric so bombastic and militaristic? Why are Europe’s leaders so afraid of democracy? Why is the continuation of the Ukraine war so important for them? And what does any of this have to do with so-called ‘European values’?
CrossTalking with Mats Nilsson, James Pearce, and Daniel McAdams.
!function(r,u,m,b,l,e){r._Rumble=b,r[b]||(r[b]=function(){(r[b]._=r[b]._||[]).push(arguments);if(r[b]._.length==1){l=u.createElement(m),e=u.getElementsByTagName(m)[0],l.async=1,l.src="https://rumble.com/embedJS/ujcwo5"+(arguments[1].video?'.'+arguments[1].video:'')+"/?url="+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+"&args="+encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify([].slice.apply(arguments))),e.parentNode.insertBefore(l,e)}})}(window, document, "script", "Rumble"); Rumble("play", {"video":"v6s71rn","div":"rumble_v6s71rn"}); -
Site: Steyn OnlineProgramming note: Tomorrow, Saturday, please join me for another eclectic edition of my Serenade Radio weekend music show, Mark Steyn on the Town, surveying the scene from French opera to Jamaican reggae. The broadcast starts at 5pm British Summer Time
-
Site: Steyn OnlineProgramming note: Please join Mark tomorrow, Saturday, for his Serenade Radio weekend music show, On the Town at 5pm British Summer Time - which is 6pm in Western Europe and 12 noon North American Eastern. You can listen from almost anywhere on the
-
Site: Ron Paul Institute - Featured Articles
Mutzig, France – First stop on my annual visit to France’s mighty Maginot Line forts is this lovely Alsatian town. Mutzig was built by the Germans 1893-1916 to defend against enemy approaches to the important city of Strasbourg. It was – and remains – the largest modern fortress in Europe.
The vast fortress, which covers over 800 acres, was never attacked during World War I by the Germans or French. But as Europe’s first important fortress made of concrete and fully electrified, it was eagerly studied by French engineers and served as a template for the Maginot Line forts two decades later.
Both world wars showed the vulnerability of fixed fortifications. An enemy will always find a way round them or discover a fatal weakness. In regard to the 200-mile-long Maginot Line, the forts did not fail. They held out to the bitter end. The reason for France’s stunning defeat in 1940 was the failure of its field army and its blockheaded generals. Interestingly, a French parliamentary deputy with the effervescent name of Perrier precisely predicted where the Germans would break through the Ardennes Forest in 1940.
Though vulnerable, the fixed defenses of the Maginot Line were hugely popular in France and wildly overestimated because they involved huge construction projects for many of the villages and factories along France’s eastern border with Germany. Just as New Deal make-work projects boosted the United States during the Great Depression.
We see a similar mania in the response to President Donald Trump’s plan to create a national ‘golden dome’ defensive shield to protect the nation from assorted nuclear threats. In many ways, it’s a re-run of President Ronald Reagan’s Star Wars missile shield which never got off the ground but was extremely popular among the public.
Frederick the Great of Prussia noted, ‘he who defends everything, defends nothing.’ As true today as it was in the 18th century.
A national missile defense system to cover the entire nation would be impossibly expensive for a nation already deeply mired in debt. The always powerful military-industrial complex will see Trump’s golden dome fantasy as a second Christmas though the basic technology has yet to be proven.
One wonders if the proponents of this defensive system have noticed that Russia has developed ballistic missiles that can alter course, change altitudes and switch targets? Or that China has ICBM’s aboard freighters in the Pacific. What about evolving electronic countermeasures that can fry enemy communications and guidance systems?
It would be far more prudent for the US to pursue disarmament talks and effective inspection regimes with its rivals than pie in the sky defensive systems that will certainly enrich military companies but fail to protect North America. What’s more, having even a partial anti-missile system will likely make the US more aggressive and prone to wars.
Better to spend the trillions on curing cancer or blindness than on space wizardry. Alas, we have a view of what awaits us. This week, Trump banned people from 12 mostly Muslims nations and imposed restrictions on 7 nations. Good work Mr. President. You and your New York City construction buddies have now made enemies of a quarter of the world’s population.
Reprinted with permission from EricMargolis.com.
-
Site: LifeNews
New evidence shows a widescale coverup regarding the dangers of chemical abortion pills.
A new peer-reviewed study by Charlotte Lozier Institute examined nearly 29,000 visits to emergency rooms by women who within 30 days had undergone either a surgical or chemical abortion.
The research revealed widespread miscoding of these ER visits. Women who were suffering serious effects of chemical abortion were often coded as having a miscarriage.
SUPPORT LIFENEWS! If you want to help fight abortion, please donate to LifeNews.com!
This in itself is not surprising but the sheer scale of deceit is stunning.
- The study revealed 79% of abortion pill ER visits were likely to be miscoded as miscarriages comparted with surgical abortions.
- Between 2016 and 2021 almost 84% of abortion pill ER visits were miscoded.
There’s more. Every case examined looked at acuity, meaning the measurement of the severity and complexity of each woman’s condition.
- The miscoded ER visits were 50% more likely to be high acuity when compared with correctly coded visits.
What accounts for this pervasive deception?
Those involved with the wholesale marketing and peddling of abortion pills, usually with no medical supervision, routinely and publicly tell women that if they require immediate medical attention to lie at the ER to cover up the abortion. Why? Because they are keenly aware of the high number of women who suffer serious and often life-threatening side effects. Making them of record is bad for business.
This duplicity runs deeper. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists actually advise medical personnel to not ask women if their urgent health condition is the result of chemical abortion. They claim this is to shield the women legally even though states protect women from prosecution.
Recent research uncovered that nearly one in 11 women who use abortion pills seek medical treatment. A frequent complication is that parts of the baby and/or placenta remain behind after a drug-induced abortion. This requires an additional abortion attempt.
Deceit in the ER impairs a doctor’s ability to fully and effectively treat her condition. Dr. James Studnicki, one of the study’s authors, called the situation “a public health crisis.”
Just days ago, Missouri Senator Josh Hawley published a letter on X. He had asked Dr. Marty Makary, Commissioner of the FDA to do a full review of the safety of chemical abortion pills. Dr. Makary responded that he would. This should give heartburn to the abortion industry and its supporters. For the last decade they and the former leadership of the FDA have been guilty of hiding the serious negative impact abortion pills have on women. Currently, abortionists need only report the complication of death.
The pills designed to kill preborn children can’t stand up to impartial scrutiny because at an alarming rate they are harming the health, fertility and lives of unsuspecting women. Further, there is considerable evidence these dangerous pills are used by sexual predators to cover up criminal activity.
This conspiracy has the potential to be the largest medical deception of our time with grave implications for millions of women and their babies.
LifeNews.com Note: Bradley Mattes is the President of Life Issues Institute, a national pro-life educational group.
The post The Abortion Pill is So Dangerous, Thousands of Women are Going to the ER appeared first on LifeNews.com.
-
Site: OnePeterFive
The Crusade of Eucharistic Reparation is a lay sodality run by OnePeterFive in partnership with Benedictus and LatinMass.com (Mass of the Ages). This crusade was called by His Excellency, Bishop Athanasius Schneider in June of 2020 in response to the profanations of Our Lord in the Blessed Sacrament during the COVID crisis. Now he has also added the intention of the reversal of Traditionis…
-
Site: LifeNews
Zack and Lindsay Knotts have filed a federal lawsuit against the city of Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio, following Zack’s arrest during a pro-life demonstration outside the Northeast Ohio Women’s Center on December 28, 2024.
The case stems from an incident in which Zack was arrested for using a battery-powered megaphone to share his pro-life message from a public sidewalk. According to the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ), which represents him, the megaphone was quieter than surrounding traffic, while abortion clinic escorts allegedly used whistles and kazoos in an attempt to drown out Zack’s megaphone.
Despite this, the ACLJ stated, only Zack was arrested for violating a Cuyahoga Falls Ordinance which prohibits “unreasonable noise” that causes “inconvenience or annoyance to persons of ordinary sensibilities.” The ACLJ argues that the ordinance lacks clear standards and was applied selectively in this instance.
The legal team pointed out that officers who made the arrest arrived after the megaphone had already stopped working, leaving them without any direct observation of its use. Because of this, the organization argues, police had no way of assessing whether the volume exceeded any legal limits.
Click here to sign up for pro-life news alerts from LifeNews.com
In addition, the ACLJ noted that the police relied solely on the account of one witness — an off-duty, private security officer employed by the abortion center — and did not interview any others, a detail the group argues presents a conflict of interest.
ACLJ’s case also includes allegations that the Knotts couple were subjected to threats from individuals on site, including a statement directed at Zack to “suck-start a shotgun.” During a prior encounter, Zack had shared that his mother-in-law once considered abortion while pregnant with his now wife, saying that if she had gone through with it, his wife “should be dead.” According to the ACLJ, an escort responded, “We can fix that.”
The ACLJ noted that when Lindsay reported these threats to law enforcement, officers stated that the comments did not constitute a crime.
Zack’s charges were ultimately dismissed at the start of the trial, as CatholicVote previously reported. However, the ACLJ maintains that the legal action had already created a deterrent effect on the Knotts’ future speech.
“The arrest, prosecution, and ongoing threat of future enforcement have already achieved the government’s apparent goal: silencing disfavored speech,” the ACLJ wrote.
The lawsuit seeks a court declaration that the ordinance is unconstitutional, a permanent injunction against its enforcement, the return of Zack’s megaphone, and compensation for alleged violations.
LifeNews Note: Rachel Quackenbush writes for CatholicVote, where this column originally appeared.
The post Arrested for Protesting Abortion, One Pro-Life Family is Fighting Back appeared first on LifeNews.com.
-
Site: Zero HedgeIs DEI DOA? Supreme Court Unanimously Rejects Added Burden For Whites In Discrimination Lawsuits
Yesterday, the Supreme Court handed down three major cases with unanimous decisions. One, Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services, raises additional questions over diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs that have been widely used in higher education and businesses. There is no reason to believe that DEI measures are DOA, but the decision is likely to accelerate challenges based reverse discrimination after the Court rejected the imposition of an added burden for members of any “majority group” including straight, white males.
The immediate question before the Court was a circuit split over the standard that applies to a member of a “majority” group who claims that he or she was treated unfairly based on majority characteristics. The Sixth Circuit, along with four other circuits, held that such litigants must shoulder additional pleading burdens under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.
Many of us long argued that this long-standing rule was itself discriminatory and at odds with both constitutional and statutory authority. It was a bizarre interpretation of a law that barred employees from discriminating based on “race, color, religion, sex, and national origin.” That would ordinarily require a plaintiff to support a claim of disparate treatment by showing that she applied for a position for which she was qualified but was rejected under circumstances giving rise to an inference of unlawful discrimination. However, judges began to add their own burden of white, male or straight litigants in requiring them to show additional “background circumstances” that show the defendant is an “unusual employer” that discriminates against majority groups.
In this case, Marlean Ames, a heterosexual woman, claimed that she was demoted at the Ohio Department of Youth Services after Ginine Trim, a gay woman, replaced her supervisor. Trim hired a younger gay man allegedly based on her sexual orientation and sex. Both the district court and the Sixth Circuit dismissed the complaint because Ames failed to identify any other “background circumstances” that demonstrated her employer discriminated against heterosexual women.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote for a unanimous Supreme Court that reversed the Sixth Circuit and rejected the “additional circumstances” test as at odds with the plain text of Title VII.
“As a textual matter, Title VII’s disparate-treatment provision draws no distinctions between majority-group plaintiffs and minority-group plaintiffs. Rather, the provision makes it unlawful “to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.” The “law’s focus on individuals rather than groups [is] anything but academic.” Bostock v. Clayton County (2020). By establishing the same protections for every “individual”—without regard to that individual’s membership in a minority or majority group—Congress left no room for courts to impose special requirements on majority-group plaintiffs alone.”
Justice Thomas, joined by Justice Gorsuch, filed a concurrence that chastised lower courts and “judges creating atextual legal rules and frameworks.”
The opinion has broader implications for businesses and higher education where DEI has been used to brush aside such reverse discrimination claims. Often such claims are mocked as suggesting that members of a majority group are “victims.” While not imposing this specific “add-on,” these controversies involve much of the same bias against reverse discrimination claims. Litigants complain that they often face greater demand and resistance to their claims as opposed to employees who are part of minority groups.
The Ames decision is a welcome development in bringing greater uniformity in the treatment of discrimination claims. It is also a shot across the bow of businesses and universities that have used DEI to dismiss the countervailing interests and claims of majority-group employees.
Here is the decision: Ames v. Ohio Dep’t of Youth Services
-
Site: LifeNews
Three days after FDA Commissioner Marty Makary promised to “closely monitor the post-marketing safety data on mifepristone for the medical termination of early pregnancy” and a week after National Right to Life wrote Commissioner Makary urging him to reexamine “studies not sponsored by the abortion industry,” four Democrat-led states asked the FDA to remove what pitifully weak “limitations” still exist.
The attorneys general of California, New York, Massachusetts and New Jersey filed a petition Thursday saying the “limitations” are “medically unnecessary.”
The FDA “must follow the science and lift these unnecessary barriers that put patients at risk and push providers out of care,” New York Attorney General Letitia James said Thursday, citing the abortion medication’s alleged “25-year safety record.”
Click here to sign up for pro-life news alerts from LifeNews.com
Their strategy was outlined in the always compliant and agreeable New York Times.
“The F.D.A. is required to respond to the petition within 180 days by granting or denying the request, or saying it needs more time,” according to the New York Times’s Pam Belluck. Belluck, who “covers reproductive health,” added, “it would prevent the F.D.A. from changing mifepristone regulations while the petition is pending.”
New Jersey Right to Life Executive Director Marie Tasy blasted state Attorney General Matthew Platkin.
Attorney General Platkin once again prioritizes the interests of the abortion lobby over the safety and well-being of women. The FDA’s decision to review the safety of the abortion pill comes in response to studies revealing severe adverse effects experienced by many women—including sepsis, infection, hemorrhaging, and other serious medical complications within 45 days of taking the drug. Women deserve leaders who advocate for their health and safety, not activist attorneys general who use their office to advance the agenda of the abortion industry.
NRLC writes the FDA
In its letter to Commissioner Makary, NRLC wrote that the FDA had “deregulated” mifepristone “in 2016, 2021, and 2023 so it can now be prescribed online without an in-person physical examination, shipped by mail to women’s homes or made available for pickup at local pharmacies, creating significant concerns over its safety and oversight.”
The letter cited the new study by the Ethics & Public Policy Center (EPPC) which concluded that “10.93 percent of women experienced complications,” 22 times the less-than-one-percent touted by sponsors of the abortion pill.
The letter ended
It isn’t merely that people need assurances that the FDA is ensuring that unsafe, ineffective drugs are kept off the market, but that women are entitled to know the truth about drugs the abortion industry is aggressively, and we believe dishonestly, promoting.
Both mothers and their children need to be protected from false advertising about what these drugs are and what they do. States which wish to protect those women and their unborn children from these dangerous drugs should be able to do so without having to fight the FDA’s official but erroneous assertions of the drug’s safety and efficacy.
Even with its limited reporting and a less than cooperative abortion industry, the FDA itself already knows of at least three dozen deaths and thousands of serious adverse events experienced by American women this past 25 years. Please put an end to this moral and medical travesty before more women and their innocent unborn children die or are injured.
LifeNews.com Note: Dave Andrusko is the editor of National Right to Life News and an author and editor of several books on abortion topics. He frequently writes Today’s News and Views — an online opinion column on pro-life issues.
The post Democrat AGs Push for Abortion on Demand With No Limits appeared first on LifeNews.com.
-
Site: The Josias
Our hosts, Fr. Jon Tveit and Amanda, are joined by Gideon Lazar for a conversation about Pope Leo XIII, his pontificate, writings, and whether there will be a Leonine revival under our newly elected pontiff, Leo XIV.
Bibliography:
- Longinqua Oceani (1895)
- The Josias Podcast, Episode VI: Ralliement
- Felix de St. Vincent, “Four Catholic Political Postures: Lessons from Leo XIII and Ralliement” (The Josias)
- The Josias Podcast, Episode XXIII: Liberty: the Highest of Natural Endowments
- Gideon Lazar, “Why I am Whitepilled by Pope Leo XIV“
- Pater Edmund, “Divisio Textus of Leo XIII’s Libertas Praestantissimum” (The Josias)
Header Image: Biagio Barzotti, Pope Leo XIII with Cardinals: Rampolla, Parochi, Bonaparte and Sacconi (c. 1890).
If you have questions or comments, please send them to editors(at)thejosias.com.
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook.
Many thanks to our generous supporters on Patreon, who enable us to pay for podcast hosting. If you have not yet joined them, please do so. You can set up a one-tim
-
Site: PaulCraigRoberts.org
The Ever-widening War
Paul Craig Roberts
Scott Ritter says the attack on Russia’s strategic bombers was a British operation that the CIA knew about. https://www.youtube.com/live/5p_faUdJT3w
According to the White House, Trump was not informed. As Russian war doctrine calls for a strategic response to such an attack, both British and US intelligence risked launching a nuclear attack on the country or countries that Russia decided was responsible.
In other words, security agencies, not the president or Congress can launch a nuclear war. A stop must be put to the unaccountability of “security agencies” as clearly they have an independence of action that makes us very insecure.
Putin avoided his responsibility as defined by Russian war doctrine by classifying the attacks as terrorism and not acts of war. Putin substituted pretense for reality and has accepted an attack on Russia’s triad of nuclear forces as a non-event in order to keep alive the Kremlin’s unrealistic hopes of a peace deal that could turn into a broader agreement.
The ever-widening war continues to widen. The consequence of Putin’s good will is likely to be more provocative attacks. Sooner or later Russia will have to respond or surrender.
Can Reality Any Longer Be Acknowledged?
Paul Craig Roberts
https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2025/06/05/can-reality-any-longer-be-acknowledged/
The attack on Russian strategic forces by Ukraine, with or without President Trump’s knowledge and with or without help from Washington and the British, could have been the most dangerous event in East-West relations during my lifetime. The reason is that recently revised Russian war doctrine states that an attack, even by a non-nuclear country, on the Russian strategic triad requires a strategic response. Strategic usually means nuclear or at least a disabling response.
Putin dodged the responsibility (more later), but no one knew for certain that he would. In other words, whoever is responsible for the attack on Russia’s strategic bombers subjected Ukraine, Europe, the US to the possibility of nuclear attack, depending on whom the Russians decided was responsible. This person or persons is a madman, a maniac who must be identified and removed from his position. Try to imagine how it is possible for, say Zelensky, to launch an attack that could result in nuclear war between the US and Russia. How can control over whether or not the US faces nuclear war be in the hands of Zelensky? If Zelensky is responsible, the US and NATO have a massive failure in command and control. If Trump or someone in the Trump administration gave the green light, they should be removed for committing the most potentially dangerous act during my lifetime.
The extraordinarily reckless and extremely dangerous attack on Russia’s nuclear triad is being treated by all concerned as a nothing event, a mere terrorist act, not an act of war. The fact that there is no acknowledgement in Washington, Europe, Moscow, or the media of the seriousness of an attack on Russian strategic forces, and thereby no measures put in place to prevent such dangerous acts, means either full scale, not proxy, war between Russia and the West or Russia’s surrender. Perhaps Putin would like to surrender in order to avoid nuclear war, but he won’t be permitted to surrender.
Putin took the lead in burying the seriousness of the attack on Russia’s nuclear triad. By designating the attack a “terrorist act” he evades the responsibility that Russian strategic doctrine imposes on him for a strategic response.
Nothing of consequence has happened, says the President of Russia. Amen say Washington and Europe. Therefore, whoever is responsible for the attack knows that the next attack can go further. It too will be unacknowledged as an act of war.
How many times can Putin pretend that attacks on Russia’s sovereignty, which is what attacks on Russia’s nuclear triad are, are mere terrorist events before he discredits himself with the Russian people?
The purpose of the recent revision of Russian strategic doctrine was to discourage or prevent attacks by Western proxies such as Ukraine on Russian strategic forces. It failed because Putin has taught the West not to take him seriously. He is ever ready to turn the other cheek. Now Putin has shown that he will not acknowledge attacks on Russian strategic forces as anything other than a terrorist event, not an act of war. So Putin has negated Russian strategic doctrine. It means nothing. Now that the West knows this, Russia can expect escalating provocations. All of Putin’s good intentions have ended in disaster, and a major war will be the consequence.
It could be that Russia is doomed. Decades of successful Western propaganda have turned most of the Russian professional and intellectual class into Atlanticist Integrationists. They think that Russia belongs as part of the West and are willing to make concessions of sovereignty to be part of the West. Clearly this point of view is strong in the Kremlin and the Russian Foreign Ministry.
The zionist American neoconservatives are very much aware of this Russian weakness, and they are adept at taking advantage of it. They don’t have to do much, because Putin does their work for them.
Putin has declared Ukraine to be conducting terrorism, not war, against Russia. Putin’s declaration also absolves Washington and Europe for any responsibility.
Here are English language Russian headlines of Putin’s hiding from reality that apparently he is unable to face up to. Or perhaps he is not yet ready, being at work constructing a powerful military that US/NATO cannot resist.
“‘Illegitimate Kiev regime’ turning into terrorist organization” – Putin
“The latest terrorist acts carried out by Ukraine in Russia are the outcome of decisions made by the Ukrainian political leadership.” Putin added that “the decisions to carry out such crimes were, of course, made in Ukraine” by the political leadership in Ukraine. In other words, Washington and Europe have no responsibility for the act of war, which is not an act of war, but merely terrorism. https://www.rt.com/russia/618651-kiev-regime-rejecting-peace/
In other words, the Kremlin has said that Washington and Europe have nothing to do with the attack on Russia’s strategic triad, and that Ukraine is merely creating terrorist incidents, not making war against Russia. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2025/01/31/russia-ukraine-rubio-trump/? utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=wp_opinions
I find it hard to believe that Putin is this stupid. My bet is that he is not yet ready. He keeps the minor Ukraine conflict going while he builds up to remove NATO from Russian borders.
Trump can remove the coming conflict by giving Putin the mutual security agreement Russia has been requesting for years. This would be the costless solution, but Trump is not really in power, and the power and profit of the US military/security complex needs the Russian Enemy.
So, how will a devastating war be avoided? Information such as I have just presented is banned by the official narratives. The American foreign policy community avoids it like the plague.
-
Site: PaulCraigRoberts.org
The Camp of the Saints
Whites to become minority in UK in 40 years
The British government is destroying the British.
White people can’t afford to have children. They are taxed too heavily in order to support immigrant-invaders.
https://www.rt.com/news/618666-study-whites-to-become-minority-uk/
-
Site: PaulCraigRoberts.org
In Latvia if you watch Russian TV they put you in prison
https://www.rt.com/russia/618630-latvia-russian-tv-channels-arrest/
-
Site: PaulCraigRoberts.org
-
Site: AsiaNews.itThe discovery was made thanks to the work of the Rubber Research Institute of Sri Lanka (RRISL). The global problem affects plants by delaying the production of the nutrients they need, impacting latex output. With the disease, yields drop by up to 40 per cent. The problem could get worse in the future.
-
Site: Zero HedgeTrump Nominates Slew Of New Generals To Command Europe, Mideast & AfricaTyler Durden Fri, 06/06/2025 - 07:45
The Trump administration has just nominated a slew of new generals to head up top US military commands in the Middle East, Africa, and Europe.
Importantly, Air Force General Alex Grynkewich has been nominated as NATO’s new Supreme Allied Commander in Europe (SACEUR) and head of U.S. European Command (EUCOM).
Gen. Alexus Grynkewich, via CENTCOM
This comes amid reports that the US under the Trump administration is growing frustrated enough to 'step back' from NATO leadership, with lack of collective defense spending out of Europe.
For example, Defense News last month acknowledged, :The nomination to head European Command, which is not yet final, comes at a moment of uncertainty for America’s military commitment to Europe, potentially including cuts to U.S. forces on the continent and a lesser role in the NATO alliance."
Brussels is meanwhile pushing plans for NATO buildup plans in connection with a new spending goal, also at a moment Washington has told the UK that it should reach a target of 5% of GDP spending on defense, according to The Telegraph.
Grynkewich currently serves as Joint Staff Director for Operations and was formerly the top US Air Force commander in the Middle East, which means he oversaw the aerial response to CENTCOM's prior bombing raids against the Houthis of Yemen, as well as previously 'counter-ISIS' ops in northern Syria.
According to his official Air Force bio:
Lt. Gen. Grynkewich received his commission in 1993 after graduating from the U.S. Air Force Academy. He has served as an instructor pilot, weapons officer and operational test pilot in the F-16 Fighting Falcon and F-22 Raptor. Lt. Gen. Grynkewich has commanded at the squadron, wing and Air Expeditionary Task Force levels. His staff assignments include service at Air Combat Command, U.S. European Command, U.S. Central Command, Headquarters Air Force, and the Joint Staff. Prior to his current assignment, he served as the 9th Air Force (Air Forces Central), Shaw Air Force Base, South Carolina, and the Combined Forces Air Component Commander for U.S. Central Command, Southwest Asia.
President Trump also nominated Navy Vice Admiral Brad Cooper, currently CENTCOM’s deputy commander, to lead CENTCOM. Additionally, Dagvin Anderson, director for Joint Force Development, has been tapped to lead US Africa Command (AFRICOM).
The Pentagon announces U.S. Air Force Lieutenant General Alexus Grynkewich as NATO's new Supreme Allied Commander and head of U.S. European Command. pic.twitter.com/IIofVrs7W3
— Clash Report (@clashreport) June 5, 2025This fresh crop of commanders are likely being tapped for their loyalty to Trump's vision of 'make deals, not chaos' for the Middle East and Eastern Europe.
While there's no peace on the horizon as yet when it comes to Ukraine, Gaza, or Yemen - there's been noticeably quiet from the White House these past few days as both conflict theatres heat up. This could be a good thing, given Trump is not issuing threats, but could be patiently waiting for how Russia's retaliation on Ukraine - for example - plays out.
-
Site: Zero HedgeFutures Rise On Easing Trump-Musk Spat As Payrolls LoomTyler Durden Fri, 06/06/2025 - 07:26
S&P 500 futures rose 0.4% as Tesla shares rebounded 4% in premarket on signs that the spat between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk is cooling. Market gains had little conviction as traders brace for Friday’s main event: a pivotal payrolls report (full preview here) that’s likely to set the direction of travel for markets. Nasdaq futures also add 0.5% even as Broadcom shares fall 3% in premarket after giving a a lackluster revenue forecast for the current quarter. European stocks are little changed. Bond yields are 1-2bp lower; the USD is higher; the yen dropped after BBG reported that Bank of Japan officials are likely to discuss slowing their pullback from buying government bonds at a policy meeting later this month. Commodities are mostly higher: Gold climbs $6 to around $3,358/oz while silver tops $36/oz. WTI falls 0.6% to $63 a barrel. Bitcoin rises 3%. Macro headlines were largely muted overnight; All eyes on NFP today.
In premarket trading, Mag7 stocks are higher, led by Tesla, whose shares are set to rebound, rising 4.9% premarket, after plunging on Thursday as the feud between Elon Musk and President Donald Trump showed signs of de-escalation (Amazon +1%, Meta +0.8%, Apple +0.6%, Alphabet +0.6%, Nvidia +0.5%, Microsoft +0.4%).
- Broadcom (AVGO) dropped 3% after the company gave a lackluster revenue forecast for the current quarter, suggesting that the AI spending frenzy isn’t as strong as some investors anticipated. Lululemon added to the gloom after its latest earnings report highlighted the risk posed by new tariffs and exacerbated concerns about slowing growth.
- Docusign (DOCU) shares are down 18% after the e-signature software company gave a second-quarter billings outlook that is weaker than expected.
- Lululemon (LULU) shares plunge 21% after the upscale athletic clothing company cut its earnings per share forecast for the full year.
Markets are still reveberating from the spat between Trump and Musk in which Trump proposed cutting off the billionaire’s government contracts. Musk, who sparked the public feud by criticizing Trump’s signature tax bill, later signaled that he’s keen to dial down the hostility. White House aides have reportedly scheduled a call with the world’s richest person for Friday in an effort to cool things down. Their public back-and-forth triggered the most spectacular real-time destruction of wealth ever, with $34 billion erased from Musk’s net worth. Tesla shares are rebounding in premarket, after tanking 14% Thursday.
“Futures are edging higher, perhaps as Musk has started to suggest on X that he would be open to a cooling-off period in his war of words with the President,” said Jim Reid, global head of macro research and thematic strategy at Deutsche Bank AG.
Moves in other asset clases were more muted as traders awaited Friday’s nonfarm payrolls report for fresh insight on how the Trump administration’s trade war is affecting the economy. Turning to today's main event, economists see payrolls rising by 125,000 after job growth in March and April exceeded projections. The unemployment rate is seen holding at 4.2%. Weak payrolls data would be bad news for markets, with a big miss potentially sending stocks down 1.5%, according to Goldman Sachs traders (full preview here). A softening labor market would support expectations that the Federal Reserve will cut interest rates at least twice this year.
“Investors are getting used to all the noise and are looking at concrete matters like the jobs report or budget,” said Mabrouk Chetouane, head of global market strategy at Natixis Investment Managers. “There is a cooling trend in the labor market, which I expect will show this afternoon. That should further reinforce our call for two or three cuts from the Fed this year.”
Meanwhile, BofA’s Michael Hartnett is warning that global stocks are close to triggering sell signals as both fund inflows and market breadth are running too hot. The strategist said inflows to stocks and high-yield bonds have totaled 0.9% of AUM in the past four weeks. The sell signal will be set off if that exceeds 1%.
European equities are little changed as investors search for fresh catalysts on trade negotiations between the US and China and look ahead to a key US jobs report. The real estate and health care sectors outperform, while consumer shares are among the biggest laggards. Among individual movers, Adidas and Puma fall after Lululemon’s disappointing quarter fueled concerns over rising competition and tariffs. Here are the biggest European movers:
- Chemring gains for an 18th straight day, rising as much as 5.1% following an upgrade to buy at Berenberg which gives the UK defense firm a clean sweep of positive analyst ratings
- Galderma shares gain as much as 3.3%, to the highest level since February after Kepler Cheuvreux initiated coverage of the Swiss pure play dermatology group with a recommendation of buy and a new street high price target.
- Demant shares jump as much as 6.7% as the stock trades for the first time since being upgraded to buy at Citi.
- Huber + Suhner shares rise as much as 4.6% after Berenberg said the Swiss electrical products manufacturer is especially well-positioned for growth as it started coverage with a buy rating.
- Canal+ rises as much as 8.1%, reaching highest since mid December, after the media and entertainment company confirmed its full-year expectations and said it has reached an agreement with France’s cinema agency to settle a tax dispute.
- Recordati shares gain as much as 3.4% to a three-month high after JPMorgan lifted its price target on the stock, saying the Italian pharmaceutical company’s growth outlook is “strong and sustainable,” even before more M&A activity.
- Norwegian salmon stocks gaining after a broad cross-party agreement to delay any sweeping changes to the licensing system for several years, according to a statement from the parties after markets closed on Thursday.
- European athleisure stocks fall as US-listed Lululemon posted a second straight disappointing quarter, fueling concerns around the impact of rising competition and new tariffs.
- Allegro shares drop after two of its major holders — investment vehicles of Cinven and Permira Holdings, sold a 5.2% stake in the company.
- PostNL falls as much as 12.5% as Kepler Cheuvreux analyst Marc Zeck downgraded his recommendation from hold to reduce.
- Dassault Systemes shares decline as much as 2.5% after the company said it aims to double its non-IFRS diluted EPS by 2029, pushing out a more ambitious 2028 goal.
- Polish banking stocks fall after Szymon Holownia, the leader of junior coalition party Polska 2050, told Polsat News that he wants to include a windfall tax on lenders into a renegotiated coalition agreement.
Earlier in the session, Asian stocks traded in a tight range as a much-anticipated call between Donald Trump and China’s Xi Jinping offered little details on how trade negotiations would progress. The MSCI Asia Pacific Index was little changed. Indian stocks rose after the central bank cut interest rates more than projected and unexpectedly reduced the cash reserve ratio for banks. Gauges in Hong Kong fell, while those in Japan rebounded. Markets in Indonesia, Philippines and South Korea were closed for holidays.
In rates, treasuries edge higher ahead of the jobs report, with US 10-year yields falling nearly 2 bps to 3.37%. Bunds outperform their US peers, pushing German 10-year borrowing costs down 5 bps to 2.54%.
In FX, the Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index rises 0.2%. The Japanese yen and Swedish krona are the weakest G-10 currencies, falling 0.4% each. The euro dips 0.3% with little reaction seen after euro-area GDP was revised up for the first quarter. ECB policymakers largely stuck to Thursday’s messaging after they cut rates by a quarter point. USDJPY rose 0.4% to 144.08 after BBG reported that Bank of Japan officials are likely to discuss slowing their pullback from buying government bonds at a policy meeting later this month.
In commodities, gold climbs $6 to around $3,360/oz while silver tops $36/oz. WTI falls 0.6% to $63 a barrel. Bitcoin rises 3%.
Looking at today's calendar, the payrolls numbers are due at 8:30 a.m., while consumer credit data is due later in the day. The Fed’s Bowman is scheduled to give a speech on supervision and regulation.
Market Snapshot
- S&P 500 mini +0.5%
- Nasdaq 100 mini +0.5%
- Russell 2000 mini +0.6%
- Stoxx Europe 600 little changed
- DAX -0.2%, CAC 40 little changed
- 10-year Treasury yield -1 basis point at 4.38%
- VIX -0.3 points at 18.18
- Bloomberg Dollar Index +0.2% at 1210.26
- euro -0.3% at $1.1413
- WTI crude -0.5% at $63.03/barrel
Top Overnight News
- Elon Musk signaled he would move to cool tensions with US President Donald Trump, after differences between the two exploded Thursday into an all-out public feud.
- White House aides scheduled a call with Elon Musk today to take down the temperature after a public feud erupted with Donald Trump. Musk signaled he’s open to cooling tensions. Premarket, Tesla shares (+4.3%) pared some of yesterday’s plunge. Musk also backed off on a threat to decommission SpaceX’s Dragon spacecraft. BBG
- In the midst of the trade war and administration efforts to disentangle the U.S. and Chinese economies, US pharma companies have simultaneously supercharged their interest in China-based biotechs, announcing what are likely to be the biggest deals ever for the rights to experimental medicines invented by Chinese companies. Barron’s
- The US Treasury called on the BOJ to raise rates to strengthen the yen, making a remarkable policy recommendation in its semiannual currency report. Japan’s finance ministry said it doesn’t comment on the views of a foreign government. BBG
- Expectations in the market are intensifying that the Japanese government may adjust debt issuance as soon as next month by increasing sales of shorter maturity securities and trimming offerings of longer-dated ones to prevent a further rise in yields. BBG
- The European Central Bank is approaching the end of its interest-rate cuts, according to two Governing Council members, as others declared inflation has been vanquished.
- The Reserve Bank of India cut its key policy rate on Friday by an unexpectedly sharp 50 bps to 5.5%, its lowest level in nearly three years, as tepid inflation allowed the bank to focus on spurring economic growth. Nikkei
- Iran orders thousands of tons of ballistic missile material from China as Tehran looks to rebuild its arsenal and provide more weapons to proxies in the Middle East. WSJ
- We estimate nonfarm payrolls rose by 110k in May, below consensus of 125k and the three-month average of +155k. On the positive side, big data indicators suggested a healthy pace of job creation. On the negative side, trade policy uncertainty was very high across the survey period and we expect another 10k decline in federal government payrolls from workforce reductions. GIR
- The ECB is approaching the end of its interest-rate cycle, Madis Muller said. Fellow Governing Council member Yannis Stournaras told BTV that the bank should take a break to give officials a chance to assess recent shocks. BBG
- Trump told Senate Republicans he’s open to a SALT cap below the $40,000 in the House-passed tax bill. BBG
Tariffs/Trade
- German Chancellor Merz said Europe is looking for more independence from China and tariffs are having a "terrible" impact on German automakers, while the Chancellery and White House agreed to even closer cooperation on trade talks, according to CNN. Merz also commented that US tariffs are threatening our economy and we are looking for ways to bring them down, according to a Fox News interview. German Chancellor Merz said this US admin is open for discussions, and hearing other opinions; no doubts US will stick with NATO
- Canadian PM Carney spoke with Chinese Premier Li Qiang and exchanged views on bilateral relations, while they emphasised the importance of engagement and both leaders agreed to regularise communication channels between Canada and China. Furthermore, they also discussed trade between the two nations and Carney’s office stated that both governments committed to collaborating on addressing the fentanyl crisis.
- Chinese Premier Li held talks with Canadian PM Carney, according to Xinhua; China willing to safeguard multilaterals and free trade with Canada. There is 'great potential' for cooperation between China & Canada. Both should strengthen cooperation in clean energy, climate change, and innovation.
- Japan's government said trade negotiator Akazawa met with US Commerce Secretary Lutnick and Akazawa strongly sought a review of US tariffs, while they discussed non-tariff barriers and trade expansion.
A more detailed look at global markets courtesy of Newsquawk
APAC stocks traded mixed following the subdued handover from the US where a stunning online bust-up between US President Trump and Elon Musk overshadowed the recent call between President Trump and Chinese President Xi in which the leaders agreed to start a new round of talks ASAP. ASX 200 saw two-way, rangebound trade as outperformance in the energy and utilities sectors was counterbalanced by losses in gold miners and the top-weighted financial industry, while a lack of pertinent data releases also contributed to the uneventful picture. Nikkei 225 gained with the index supported by recent currency weakness although further upside was capped following disappointing Household Spending data which showed a steeper-than-feared M/M decline and a surprise Y/Y contraction. Hang Seng and Shanghai Comp were indecisive despite the recent phone call between US President Trump and Chinese President Xi which the White House had been touting throughout the week, while Xi reiterated calls for the US to handle the Taiwan issue with caution.
Top Asian News
- RBI cut the Repurchase Rate by 50bps to 5.50% (exp. 25bps cut) and changed its stance to neutral from accommodative, while it cut the Standing Deposit Facility Rate and Marginal Standing Facility Rate by 50bps each to 5.25% and 5.75%, respectively. RBI Governor Malhotra said growth remains lower than aspirations and it is important to stimulate growth, as well as noted that front-loading rate cuts to support growth was felt necessary. Malhotra also stated that inflation has softened significantly over the last six months and inflation is likely to undershoot the full-year target at the margin, while he noted that monetary policy has limited space left to support growth and they retained the FY26 Real GDP growth forecast at 6.5%. Furthermore, the RBI Governor announced to cut the Cash Reserve Ratio by 100bps in four equal tranches, which will release INR 2.5tln, as well as noted that they will continue to monitor and take measures as necessary and that the CRR cut is to reduce the cost of funding of banks and help accelerate policy transmission.
- PBoC set USD/CNY mid-point at 7.1845 vs exp. 7.1935 (Prev. 7.1865).
- Japan's former top FX diplomat says narrowing US-Japan rate gap will likely support the yen at around 135-140 against USD by year-end.
European bourses - Flat/lower trade across Europe following the fallout of the dramatic Trump-Musk spat, but with traders setting their sights on the US jobs report due 13:30 BST/08:30 EDT. On the week, futures of the broad Stoxx 600 and Euro Stoxx 50 indices are currently poised for a second week of gains, though not by much at this stage, and will depend on how the aforementioned data comes in. European sectors - Sectors display a mixed picture with the breadth of the market also narrow, with no real bias. Top gainers at the time of writing include Health Care (+0.6%), Energy (+0.5%), and Retail (+0.3%); losers include Basic Resources (-0.9%), Industrial Goods and Services (-0.4%), and Media (-0.3%). European movers - HSBC (+0.3%) chairman Mark Tucker will step down on September 30th. Adidas (-1.3%), JD Sports (-0.5%), and Puma (-1.6%) are all slipping after US apparel maker Lululemon (LULU) saw its shares tumble by over 20% in extended trading. Airbus (-0.9%) confirmed that it delivered 51 jets in May (-4% Y/Y),
Top European News
- UK government unveiled new concessions to private equity firms regarding its tax break crackdown in which it proposed changes to tax treatment of carried interest that will make the regime less onerous, according to FT.
- ECB's Holzmann says "I dissented" at the rate decision on Thursday (as expected)Lowering rates at a time of high savings and low investments ha no effect except a monetary effectCurrently expansive in monetary policyLagarde said we are at the end of the cycle, wanted to discuss whether that is the caseCurrent nominal neutral rate is around 3%
- ECB's Muller said ECB can be happy with inflation where it is; and he agrees with ECB President Lagarde that cycle almost finished. Hard to say what's coming next on rates.
- ECB's Villeroy said the ECB has won the battle against inflation in Europe, and we will not again see the low rates we saw a few years ago, and added that French inflation is now under control but debt remains a serious issue, "France cannot continue like this", according to Bloomberg.
- ECB's Simkus said interest rates are now at neutral; its important to keep full flexibility, according to Reuters. Stournaras said the best thing for the ECB is to wait and see, ECB rate cutting is nearly done, ECB has achieved a soft landing, and ECB may cut if the economy weakens and inflation falls. Stournaras noted of downside risks to growth, and the bank is "quite" confident in its forecasts, and said he's afraid the Dollar may lose some of its status.
- Bundesbank semi-annual report: German recovery delayed further; economy to tread water in 2025; German GDP to stagnate in 2025, grow by 0.7% in 2026. Increased defence, infrastructure spending to significantly increase growth by the end of 2027. German exports will decline significantly in 2025, increase only slightly next year.
- Italian Stats Bureau ISTAT cut Italy's 2025 GDP growth to 0.6% from 0.8% forecast in December.
- SNB noted that it does not engage in any manipulation of the CHF; does not seek to prevent adjustments in the balance of trade or to gain unfair competitive advantages for the Swiss economy. In addition, the use of FX market interventions may be necessary under certain circumstances to ensure appropriate monetary conditions. SNB monetary policy is geared towards the needs of Switzerland.
FX
- USD - USD is slightly firmer in what has ultimately been a week of losses for DXY. Attention now is firmly fixated on today's NFP report which is set to see payroll growth slow to 130k from 177k and unemployment rate hold steady @ 4.2%. As it stands, the next 25bps cut is not fully priced until September with 54bps of loosening seen by year-end. DXY is towards the top end of yesterday's 98.35-98.94 range.
- EUR - EUR is trivially softer vs. the USD after gaining yesterday on account of the ECB rate decision which saw policymakers pull the trigger on a 25bps rate cut, whilst noting that policy is "well-positioned"; suggesting that the ECB could be nearing or at the end of its cutting cycle. ECB speak this morning hasn't shifted the dial with policymakers signalling flexibility going forward, whilst acknowledging progress on inflation. EUR/USD is contained within yesterday's 1.1404-1.1495 range.
- JPY - JPY is the laggard across the majors following disappointing Household Spending data. Subsequently, USD/JPY briefly made its way back onto a 144 handle with a current session peak @ 144.13, stopping shy of the WTD high @ 144.39. On the trade front, Japan's government said trade negotiator Akazawa met with US Commerce Secretary Lutnick and Akazawa strongly sought a review of US tariffs. Elsewhere, Japan's former top FX diplomat says narrowing US-Japan rate gap will likely support the yen at around 135-140 against USD by year-end.
- GBP - GBP is softer vs. the broadly firmer USD with UK-specific newsflow on the light side ahead of next week's UK spending review. On which, UK Chancellor Reeves reaffirmed she will not have a UK budget like October's again, but can't rule out any tax changes over the next four years. For today's agenda, BoE Chief Economist Pill is due to speak @ 13:00BST, but given the subject matter of "AI and Households", it is unclear how much he will touch on monetary policy. After printing a multi-year high yesterday @ 1.3616, Cable has since retreated and moved back below the 1.3550 mark.
- Antipodeans - Antipodeans are steady vs. the USD following a light data docket and relevant newsflow overnight. Both continue to keep an eye on US-Sino relations following the Xi-Trump call yesterday given their trade exposure. However, the readout had little follow-through into either currency. AUD/USD has moved back onto a 0.64 handle and pulled back from yesterday's YTD peak @ 0.6538. NZD/USD has also retreated from yesterday's YTD high @ 0.6080 but is still holding above the 0.60 mark.
- NBP's Litwiniuk said they need to be cautious regarding the disinflation path; MPC can return to the subject of cuts in July or September; rates can still be cut by 100-125bps this year.
Treasuries
- USTs - USTs are a touch higher ahead of the US jobs report and following yesterday's ECB-led losses which outmuscled a spike higher in weekly claims metrics. As it stands, the next 25bps cut is not fully priced until September with 54bps of loosening seen by year-end. Sep'25 USTs are currently within yesterday's 110.23+ to 111.14+ range. From a yield perspective, the US curve is fractionally in bull flattening mode, whilst the 10yr yield has moved back to the 4.37% after venturing as low as 4.318% yesterday.
- Bunds - Bunds are attempting to atone for yesterday's losses which were seen in the wake of the ECB rate decision. Sep'25 Bunds have been as high as 130.72 but are still some way away from yesterday's peak @ 131.47. The 10yr yield is back below the 2.55% mark after climbing as high as 2.581% yesterday.
- Gilts - Gilts are currently being led by the upside in German paper as UK-specific newsflow remains light ahead of next week's UK spending review. Sep'25 Gilts have been as high as 92.31 but still have some ground to cover before approaching yesterday's best @ 92.63. The 10yr yield currently sits just above the 4.6% mark and within yesterday's 4.557-4.648% range.
Commodities
- Crude Futures - Subdued trade amid a firmer Dollar and overall cautious risk tone heading into the US jobs report before the weekend. Contracts saw a leg lower likely on technicals as WTI dipped under USD 63.00/bbl at the same time as Brent fell under USD 65.00/bbl, although prices thereafter stabilised. News flow has been light for the complex, with nothing major to report in geopolitics either.
- Precious Metals - Spot gold and silver are largely treading water amid a lack of catalysts during the European morning in the run-up to the US jobs report. Spot gold currently resides in a current USD 3,351.49-3,375.29/oz range, well within yesterday's USD 3,338.29-3,403.15/oz parameter.
- Base Metals - Mixed trade across base metals, in fitting with the cautious risk tone ahead of the US jobs report, with the Trump-Xi phone call doing little to keep broader prices underpinned during this session. 3M LME copper dipped back under USD 9,700/t to trade in a USD 9,659.00-9,768.00/t range at the time of writing. Dalian iron ore futures rose to a one-week peak overnight with traders citing strong Chinese demand coupled with some optimism following the Trump-Xi call, with the front-month contract ending daytime trade +0.9%.
- HSBC expects OPEC+ to accelerate supply hikes in August and September; weaker fundamentals after the summer, raise downside risks to the Bank's USD 65/bbl brent forecast from Q425.
- LME has intervened to make Mercuria roll its "huge" position in aluminium, according to Bloomberg.
- India's Mines Minister said exploring critical mineral assets in Australia, Argentina and Chile.
- EU Ags Commissioner said EU-Ukraine trade has reverted to conditions of pre-war trade deal, after the expiry of wartime exemptions; could conclude a longer-term trade arrangement by summer. New EU-Ukraine trade arrangement will be in between the quotas under pre-war trade deal and war-time exemptions
Geopolitics: Middle East
- Israel assured the US it won't strike Iran unless talks fail, according to Axios.
- Iran is said to have ordered material from China that could make hundreds of ballistic missiles, according to Wall Street Journal.
- "Lebanese Army: Israel's continued violation of the agreement may push us to freeze cooperation with the monitoring committee regarding site inspection", via Al Hadath.
Geopolitics: Ukraine
- Ukraine said Russia launched a drone and missile attack with explosions and air defence activity heard over Kyiv.
- Russian Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Ryabkov said returning to the arms control agreement with the US is becoming less and less realistic amid the US' Golden Dome project.
- EU is weighing adding Russia to its money laundering 'grey list', according to FT.
- French Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs hopes the European Commission will put new Russian sanctions package before the end of June, according to Reuters.
US Event Calendar
- 8:30 am: May Change in Nonfarm Payrolls, est. 126k, prior 177k
- 8:30 am: May Change in Private Payrolls, est. 120k, prior 167k
- 8:30 am: May Change in Manufact. Payrolls, est. -4.5k, prior -1k
- 8:30 am: May Unemployment Rate, est. 4.2%, prior 4.2%
- 8:30 am: May Average Hourly Earnings MoM, est. 0.3%, prior 0.2%
- 8:30 am: May Average Hourly Earnings YoY, est. 3.7%, prior 3.8%
- 3:00 pm: Apr Consumer Credit, est. 10b, prior 10.17b
Central Banks
- 10:00 am: Fed’s Bowman Gives Speech on Supervision, Regulation
DB's Jim Reid concludes the overnight wrap
Markets had a volatile session yesterday, as they grappled with a barrage of news that each pushed in different directions. Those included positive US-China headlines amid a call between Trump and Xi, a hawkish ECB decision and more weak data from the US. But the most remarkable was an extraordinary war of words between Trump and Elon Musk that ultimately left risks assets losing ground. Tesla’s shares plunged by -14.26%, while the S&P 500 fell -0.53% despite earlier briefly moving into technical bull market territory as it climbed just over +20% since its recent low on April 8.
The dramatic feud between the US President and the world’s richest man emerged after Trump said during a meeting with Germany’s chancellor Merz that he was “disappointed” and “surprised” in Musk’s recent criticism of the Republicans’ budget bill, with Musk responding on X by suggesting that Trump would have lost the election without his support. The war of words then escalated on social media, with Trump posting that “The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon’s Governmental Subsidies and Contracts”, while Musk posted that Trump’s tariffs “will cause a recession in the second half of this year” and responded “yes” to a suggestion that Trump should be impeached.
Following the Trump-Musk spat, Tesla’s shares slumped -14.26%, which together with a -3.55% decline on Wednesday marked its worst two-day decline (-17.30%) since 2020. The feud also weighed on US risk assets more broadly, with the S&P 500 (-0.53%) seeing ten of its eleven sector groups move lower on the day. Meanwhile, the VIX volatility index rose +0.87pts to 18.48, having been earlier on course to fall to its lowest level since late March. The tech mood has stayed subdued overnight as Broadcom’s results delivered a lackluster revenue forecast. The chipmaker, which is now the 7th largest company in the S&P 500 and around $300bn of market cap ahead of Tesla, saw its shares slide by more than -4% after-hours. However S&P 500 (+0.25%) and NASDAQ 100 (+0.14%) futures are edging higher, perhaps as Musk has started to suggest on X that he would be open to a cooling-off period in his war of words with the President.
Earlier on in the session we had seen a clear risk-on move on both sides of the Atlantic as a surprise Trump-Xi call raised the prospect of fresh US-China talks, leading to growing optimism that trade tensions would ease. The news of a call by Chinese state media led to an immediate jump in US equity futures. Shortly after, the rally got a further boost after Trump posted that it was “a very good phone call” which “resulted in a very positive conclusion for both Countries.” In the post, it said that their respective teams would soon meet, and also that “There should no longer be any questions respecting the complexity of Rare Earth products.” So that helped to boost market optimism, particularly after Trump had posted the previous day that Xi was “VERY TOUGH, AND EXTREMELY HARD TO MAKE A DEAL WITH!!!”.
The trade headlines outweighed an initial negative reaction to the latest weekly US jobless claims, which added to fears that the US labour market was finally deteriorating after Liberation Day. Initial jobless claims (one of the most timely indicators we get) moved up to 247k in the week ending May 31 (vs. 235k expected), reaching their highest level since October. Moreover, that followed the very soft ADP report the previous day, which had private payrolls up by just +37k in May. The one caveat to the claims data is that seasonals tend to boost the number a bit at this time of the year. However it’s not the only evidence of a slightly weakening labour market. So that’s really heightened the focus on today’s jobs report for May, as any softness there would really magnify those fears. In terms of what to expect, our US economists forecast nonfarm payrolls to come in at +125k, dipping down from the +177k in March, with the unemployment rate remaining at 4.2%.
Those competing factors drove a big turnaround for US Treasuries yesterday. They initially fell back, with the 10yr yield hitting an intraday low of 4.31% just after the claims data. But the hawkish ECB decision and the Trump-Xi call led to a significant turnaround, with the 10yr yield ultimately closing up +3.7bps at 4.39%. The moves were even larger at the front-end of the curve, with the 2yr yield up +5.4bps to 3.92% as investors dialled back the likelihood of Fed rate cuts.
Meanwhile in Europe, the ECB was the biggest market driver yesterday. They cut rates by 25bps as expected, taking the deposit rate down to 2%. But significantly, President Lagarde signalled that they had “nearly concluded” the easing cycle, suggesting that policy rates weren’t likely to go much lower from here. She also signalled little urgency to cut rates, saying that the current level left them “in a good position to navigate the uncertain conditions that will be coming up.” As such, the ECB appears to be saying that it may have now reached the appropriate level of rates, a stronger message than a soft signal of a pause our European economists had expected. That said, our economists see expected soft growth in H2 and more significant disinflation than projected by the ECB as still favouring some further easing. See their full reaction here.Lagarde’s comments immediately drove a clear market reaction, with another 25bp ECB cut now being less than fully priced, the 2yr German yield surging +7.8bps on the day and the euro itself strengthening +0.25%. Several other details also fed into the hawkish narrative, with the policy statement saying that although trade uncertainty would be a short-term drag, “rising government investment in defence and infrastructure will increasingly support growth over the medium term.” Later in the day, Bloomberg also reported that ECB officials thought a pause at the next meeting in July was the most likely scenario, with mixed views on whether another rate cut was likely after that. By the close, yields on 10yr bunds (+5.2bps), OATs (+4.7bps) and BTPs (+3.5bps) had all moved higher. Otherwise, equities ended the day higher with the STOXX 600 up +0.16%, but that was mainly thanks to the Trump-Xi call, as the index had been in negative territory after the hawkish ECB news.
In Asia markets are relatively subdued this morning. The Nikkei (+0.24%) has risen a little on weak Japanese economic data that might delay further rate hikes by the BOJ (more below). Meanwhile, the CSI (-0.12%) and the Shanghai Composite (-0.06%) are struggling to gain traction while the Hang Seng (-0.21%) and the S&P/ASX 200 (-0.19%) are seeing minor losses.
Coming back to Japan household spending (-0.1% y/y) unexpectedly fell in April, attributed to consumers curbing spending due to rising prices. This contrasted sharply with market expectations of a +1.5% gain following the previous month's +2.1% increase.
Elsewhere yesterday, data showed the US trade deficit narrowed sharply to $61.6bn in April, reflecting the impact of the new tariffs. That was the smallest monthly deficit since September 2023, and a huge decline from the prior month's $138.3bn trade deficit. Given that lower imports mechanically add to GDP, this is expected to lead to a strong bounceback in GDP for Q2 after the Q1 contraction. Indeed, the Atlanta Fed’s latest GDPNow estimate is pointing to annualised growth of +3.8% in Q2.
To the day ahead now, and the main highlight will be the US jobs report for May. Over in Europe, there’s also Euro Area retail sales for April, and German and French industrial production for April. Otherwise, central bank speakers include ECB President Lagarde, and the ECB’s Holzmann, Simkus and Centeno.
-
Site: Zero HedgeDo We Really Need Home Robots?Tyler Durden Fri, 06/06/2025 - 07:20
Authored by Jeffrey Tucker via The Epoch Times,
Maybe there was a time—when I was a kid watching “The Jetsons”—when I fantasized about a walking, talking, productive robot in my house. It would do the laundry, the cooking, the cleaning, answer the door, walk the dog, dress the kids, make the bed, and so on.
Many companies, most notably Tesla, are working on this now. We see the prototypes all over social media. Artificial intelligence (AI) language models have made their speech very impressive. Their movements are looking ever more natural. They do seem to be on the way, and Elon Musk says they will be the biggest consumer product in history.
These days, I’m not so sure. In fact, the prospect seems absurd to me, destined to make our lives worse not better. Do we really need fewer routines and more excuses to sit and stare at our computers while machines do even more work for us?
Count me among the skeptics. We have been replacing household routines with machines for a century. Some have merit because the manual way is too arduous. I would rather have a vacuum cleaner than beat out rugs, even if the latter method is better in the long run. Same with dishwashers and washing machines. I get that they save time.
But there comes a point when it is all too much. The trigger for me was the “smart” lightbulb. That’s where I drew the line. I would rather stand up and turn it off and on than become nothing but a couch potato with a smartphone. There are reasons perhaps for the ability to remotely manage household temperature, but if I were building today, I would look long and hard for analog over digital thermostats.
After my decision to reject smart bulbs, I started de-digitizing my domestic space. No more home assistants. I can stand up and turn the volume on the speaker up and down with my fingers. I can look through a hole in the door to see who is there. I can walk to the car and turn it on. And so on. I also appreciate not being surrounded by tools of surveillance.
As this process unfolded, I began to realize something culturally insidious about all of these new technologies. They all teach us to regret however it is we are using our time except and to the extent we are frittering away our lives on digital devices. They teach us that everything else we are doing is a waste of time.
We are encouraged always to get things done faster and with ever less effort. Whatever we are doing is regrettable. Adopting a new tech means saving time and energy. But ask yourself: For what are we actually saving this time and energy? Very likely it is something else that you are supposed to regret.
This becomes a major attitude problem. It creates a culture of grumbling and discontent. That attitude invades our hearts and souls, so eventually the normal stream of life itself becomes nothing other than a big pain in the neck. This then fuels the consumer demand for ever more products that promise to do everything for us.
How many actual skills are we losing along the way? Plenty.
Quick story about how I had wax melted all over a linen cloth. I had no idea what to do about it. So I looked it up on Grok. The suggestion came in two parts. First, freeze the cloth and scrape off the excess with a credit card. Second, iron it with a hot iron with a brown bag or newspaper between the iron and cloth.
I did it and was utterly astounded. It worked like a dream.
I thought, “Thank goodness for AI for teaching me this amazing trick.”
But in talking with others about it, it turns out that this is not some great secret. This is how people have been removing wax from cloth for centuries.
Apparently, our grandfathers all knew this. But for me, I somehow missed out on that lesson. Now it can be part of my routines.
One wonders how much other knowledge is being lost as we turn over more and more parts of our lives to AI and robots. There is a genuine danger here of intellectual and spiritual atrophy. We should think about this carefully before we plunge full-on into a machine-run world.
Every new technology brings benefits, but also costs. Musical skill is evaporating in the home, for example, and has for decades. Most young people today have no idea how to iron. When inflation hit restaurants so hard a few years ago, many people had to learn how to cook for the first time.
Most people have no clue about how clothing comes to be washed without a machine and would not even know how to begin cleaning a pair of socks by soaking them in hot water. Instead, we think the machines do some mysterious magic inside a rumbling box.
This is not a case against streaming music or washing machines but only a heads-up that they come at the cost of our own capacity to manage our lives in their absence. We become less useful as human beings. That surely must be recognized as something to regret, even if only a bit.
We should be more aware of the way the product market thrives off feeding our disgruntlement. It’s not evil, and that’s the market at work. There’s always going to be a better mousetrap.
But we should still be aware of the effect on our lives and attitudes. There is merit and joy in simple routines such as cleaning, cooking, folding, walking the dog, standing up from time to time and doing things, and even gardening and hard work.
If we come to think of all these things as pointless expenditures of time and energy, better done by a machine, a major swath of our lives becomes nothing but drudgery.
This is all about the attitude we bring to routine tasks. If we go into them with a sense that someone or something else should be doing them, we have a downcast mind, do a sloppy job, and let our brains be invaded by all kinds of negative energy.
If you look at the same task as an opportunity to be scrupulous, to be useful, to achieve something with one’s own hands, to better our little part of the world, and to take pride in what we have done, the opposite happens. Our blues turn to joy, gradually over time.
As I’ve written, this is how farmers think. They rise early to feed the chickens, repair the fences, fix the water well, brush the horses, or whatever else, not with a sense that all of this is terrible but rather that this is how life is, its very essence. It is all about using one’s own energy to exercise some controlling and civilizing cooperative relationship with the natural world around us.
Most of us are not farmers, but we can adopt the same patience, persistence, and joy that they have, even if we are dealing with urban commutes, buying groceries, or keeping our homes and spaces clean and orderly. Or gardening. We don’t need robots for this. We can do this with our own hands.
Again, what precisely are we preparing to do with the time we supposedly save with all this automation and rushing around? If you think about it, you are probably merely doing something else that you are regretting just as much as the previous thing. Honestly, this is no way to live.
It’s all about the attitude we bring to the conduct of daily life. If we listen to the constant screams that our lives are miserable—that it is darn near slavery to fold clothes and do dishes—so we need robots to do things for us, the result will be sadness all around instead of a constant sense of achievement.
Maybe there is a role for these machines for the sick and infirm, just like autonomous driving can be a dream for those in no position to drive themselves. But as usual with new products, we have a tendency to wildly exaggerate their merits, believing that they will take away all the demons that surround us. When that doesn’t work, we turn to substances.
Buy a robot if you must, but it is just as crucial to learn and do so-called menial tasks with joy, if only to remind ourselves of the high place of the human person—ourselves—in the unfolding of our lives. Maybe we should stop spending money on toys that encourage us to believe that we are ever less useful as human beings.
Every new technology in the 21st century seems to go in the same direction: overpromised results, wild enthusiasm, roaring stock markets, release, disappointment, and finally reality. Remember the way we were all going to wear headsets and live in the Metaverse? That did not happen.
Similarly on robots for domestic use. I’m bearish. My intuition is that society has already seen peak techno-utopia and is now ready for a return to the physical world with all its beautiful routines, the mastery of which requires human hands.
Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times or ZeroHedge.
-
Site: Mises InstituteAs a bookend to last week‘s critical article on Thomistic Aristotelianism of Alasdair MacIntyre, Dr. David Gordon in Friday Philosophy scrutinizes the libertarian-tolerant philosopher Henry B. Veatch. Dr. Gordon finds Veatch‘s arguments much more tolerable.
-
Site: Novus Motus LiturgicusPfarrkirche Lunz am See: Lunz Parish Church, AustriaThere is a special joy in seeing something that one has only read about for years. I experienced this joy in Lunz am See, Austria, last week. This tiny town in Lower Austria, not far from the crystal-clear lake of Lunzersee, has a quaint parish church that was built around 1502. It is described both as a Marienkirche (a church dedicated to the Michael P. Foleyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02649905848645336033noreply@blogger.com0
-
Site: Zero HedgeJapan's iSpace Spacecraft Crashes On Moon, Shares Crater Back On EarthTyler Durden Fri, 06/06/2025 - 06:55
Tokyo-based ispace Inc.'s second uncrewed lunar landing attempt ended in failure on Friday, as its Resilience lander crashed during the final descent phase. The lunar mishap marks another setback for the Japanese firm.
"As of 8:00 a.m. on June 6, 2025, mission controllers have determined that it is unlikely that communication with the lander will be restored and therefore completing Success 9 is not achievable. It has been decided to conclude the mission," ispace wrote on X.
As of 8:00 a.m. on June 6, 2025, mission controllers have determined that it is unlikely that communication with the lander will be restored and therefore completing Success 9 is not achievable. It has been decided to conclude the mission.
— ispace (@ispace_inc) June 6, 2025
“Given that there is currently no… pic.twitter.com/IoRUfggoiQThe mission, which was positioned as a pivotal moment for Japan's entry into lunar exploration and a cornerstone for its commercial space ambitions, has sidelined moon missions from the company for now. The loss follows a failed 2023 mission due to a software error.
Meanwhile, Texas-based rivals Intuitive Machines Inc. and Firefly Aerospace Inc. have already achieved lunar landings. Firefly became the first private company to successfully land a functioning spacecraft on the moon in March, while Intuitive Machines managed a hard touchdown—but its lander lost functionality just hours later.
Ispace provided color on the sequence of events that led to the failed landing:
ispace engineers at the HAKUTO-R Mission Control Center in Nihonbashi, Tokyo, transmitted commands to execute the landing sequence at 3:13 a.m. on June 6, 2025. The RESILIENCE lander then began the descent phase. The lander descended from an altitude of approximately 100 km to approximately 20 km, and then successfully fired its main engine as planned to begin deceleration. While the lander's attitude was confirmed to be nearly vertical, telemetry was lost thereafter, and no data indicating a successful landing was received, even after the scheduled landing time had passed.
Based on the currently available data, the Mission Control Center has been able to confirm the following: The laser rangefinder used to measure the distance to the lunar surface experienced delays in obtaining valid measurement values. As a result, the lander was unable to decelerate sufficiently to reach the required speed for the planned lunar landing. Based on these circumstances, it is currently assumed that the lander likely performed a hard landing on the lunar surface.
After communication with the lander was lost, a command was sent to reboot the lander, but communication was unable to be re-established.
In markets, iSpace shares in Tokyo crashed on Friday, closing down nearly 29%... What goes up must come down.
Earlier, Ispace CEO Takeshi Hakamada held a news conference following news of the failed landing attempt. He compared iSpace to SpaceX: "SpaceX has also failed several times, but now SpaceX occupies the launching market."
Ispace CFO Jumpei Nozaki recently told CNN that the company has already secured funds for a third attempt at landing a craft on the lunar surface.
-
Site: Zero HedgeDoug Casey On Silver: Money, Markets, & The Metal's Role In The Coming Chaos
International Man: What is it about silver that makes it viable as a monetary metal—that is, something people actually use to store and exchange value?
Doug Casey: Let’s look at the definition of what makes a good money. There are basically six characteristics. A good money has to be durable, divisible, convenient, consistent, have use value, and some limit on supply. Using those six key characteristics, gold ranks first, silver second, and copper third. That’s why those three metals have been preferred money throughout history. They were superior to seashells, salt, cows, paper, and other commodities. In today’s world it makes sense to bring Bitcoin, which also satisfies those six characteristics into the mix.
So, to answer the question: Silver has always been a monetary metal, and it likely always will be.
International Man: Do you think gold functions better as money than silver—and if so, why? If not, why not?
Doug Casey: Gold is much scarcer than silver. It has an extremely high unit value. And its value relative to silver has increased throughout history. In the days of Ancient Egypt, gold traded at only three times the value of silver. In Rome, at the time of Caesar, the gold aureus was worth about 12 times more than the silver denarius. The US initially fixed the value of gold against silver at 17.5 to 1. Incidentally, fixing the value of any commodities—which fluctuate widely for many reasons—is always a bad idea. As of now, the ratio is about 100 to 1. The increase in gold’s value relative to silver is a trend that, with fits and starts, has been in motion for over 3,000 years.
It’s important to have an adequate quantity of money available for use in commerce. This was a problem in the early days of the US, when there was neither enough gold nor silver in circulation. Of course, the terms “adequate” and “enough” are rather arbitrary. That’s one reason why money itself should be strictly a function of the free market, not government. If there’s not “enough” gold or silver, more will be mined at a profit. When there’s too much, mining becomes unprofitable, and stops. Unlike government money, free market money is self-regulating.
Out of maybe 7 billion ounces of gold that have ever been mined, almost all is stored in vaults, safe deposit boxes, or worn as jewelry. Most is owned by governments and their central banks. It doesn’t circulate in any meaningful way.
Governments—including the US government—used to hold large amounts of silver in storage too. But now none do.
International Man: The long-term trend has been for silver to be demonetized and increasingly treated as an industrial metal. Do you see that continuing, and what are the implications?
Doug Casey: Let’s look at silver as an element. In the past, it was only used as jewelry. But out of the 92 elements, it’s the most reflective and the most conductive of both heat and electricity. There’s every reason to believe that silver is going to gain many more industrial uses over time because of these properties. It’s a high-tech metal.
A great deal of silver used to be consumed in photography and X-rays, until a generation ago, but it’s hardly used there at all anymore. Digital photography has nearly replaced it.
About 850 million ounces of silver are mined every year, and about another 150 million ounces are recycled. The available supply of bullion, therefore, is about a billion ounces—versus about 100 million ounces of gold. That’s roughly a ten-to-one ratio on the supply side, although most of the silver is “consumed,” whereas almost all the gold is added to inventory. Since 2019, silver has been in deficit. Roughly 150 million ounces a year have been taken from various stockpiles. That explains why its price has risen to a new base level in the $30 to $35 range, and done better than gold, percentage-wise.
And while we’re talking about silver’s unique qualities, it’s worth mentioning that gold also has unique metallic properties. It’s the most non-reactive of all metals; gold doesn’t oxidize. It’s the most ductile, meaning it can be drawn into the thinnest wire of any metal. It’s the most malleable, meaning it can be beaten into the thinnest sheet of all metals.
When people talk about gold and silver, they often treat them as if they were one metal. While they do share a lot of characteristics, they each have unique qualities. You’ll notice that, on the Periodic Table of Elements, copper (with 29 protons) is at the top of the file, above silver (with 47), and gold (79). The three metals are closely related atomically, as well as by their traditional use as money.
International Man: During times of monetary chaos and runaway inflation, people tend to rush into traditional forms of money—assets that hold value better than rapidly depreciating government paper.
Silver often sees a surge in demand during these moments, despite its limited monetary role today.
Do you see something like that happening again?
Doug Casey: I don’t think there’s any doubt that we’re heading into a massive monetary crisis. The dollar is going to lose value at an accelerating rate because of the US government’s profligate spending policies.
DOGE, which was an excellent idea, has failed; the deficits are going to rise from $2 trillion to $3 trillion. And when the economy takes a downward turn, the government’s tax revenues will fall, even while its obligations rise. I expect that within the next five years, we’ll see $5 to $6 trillion annual deficits.
That’s why bonds are in a world of trouble, for reasons we’ve discussed in the past. The stock market is grossly overpriced. Real estate is also in bubble territory, with large carrying costs aggravating the problem. The average guy is likely to rediscover gold, and especially silver.
International Man: Where do you see silver prices heading, and what do you think are the best ways to speculate on a rise?
Doug Casey: Both gold and silver are in major bull markets. Silver is the poor man’s gold. The average guy, who can’t lay his hands on $500 cash if he needs it, really can’t afford gold. But when he gets scared enough about what’s going on, silver will still be relatively affordable. The average guy will start accumulating silver as a place to hide.
I’ve accumulated silver for many years, just like gold. I’ve only bought it, never sold it. The problem with silver is that its unit value is so low, you’d need a vault like Uncle Scrooge to store a substantial amount. That’s not true with gold.
That said, everybody should have 100 ounces of silver coins. If you can, set aside a few thousand ounces as a savings vehicle. If the US government succeeds in destroying the dollar, many people are likely to prefer being paid, and buying and selling, with gold and silver coins. They’ll want something real and tangible, not a digital abstraction, or pieces of paper.
It really doesn’t matter how high the price of silver goes from a supply point of view. That’s because almost all new silver is a byproduct of mining other metals—gold, copper, lead, and zinc. To major mining companies, silver is only a nice bonus. Even at $100 it won’t have a material effect on their production plans.
Years ago, there was a Spokane Stock Exchange. It closed in 1991. Most people are unaware the US used to have a number of regional stock exchanges—Denver for oil, Salt Lake for uranium, and so forth. Scores of small silver stocks were traded in Spokane. From about 1960 to 1970, those little penny stocks went up by orders of magnitude. The boom was chronicled in a book called “Small Fortunes in Penny Gold Stocks.” The best one was Coeur d’Alene Mines, which went from 2 cents to $20. That kind of thing could happen again.
There are a few pure publicly traded silver companies now, and they’re generally very small-cap stocks. Institutions don’t own them, and few care about them. However, I think we’re going to see $100 or $200 silver in the next few years, and these stocks should catch fire. There used to be a whole class of investment advisors who published newsletters and made a living beating the drum about silver. They no longer exist. That tells me that silver is under-owned, nobody cares about it, and it’s going higher.
I consider silver stocks a superb speculation.
* * *
Doug Casey’s analysis lays bare the forces reshaping our financial future—and why silver may once again emerge as the “people’s money” during times of crisis. In a must-watch video, Doug pulls back the curtain on what the mainstream media won’t tell you about precious metals. Click here to watch it now.
-
Site: Catholic Conclave"The Association of Roman Catholic Women Priests (ARCWP) and the Christian community 'Home Novo' invite everyone to the ordination of Christina Moreira Vázquez as bishop." This is the wording of the invitation currently being circulated, announcing a unique event (at least in Spain): the ordination of a woman as bishop.The association, to which Moreira belongs as a priest, has already ordained Catholic Conclavehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06227218883606585321noreply@blogger.com0
Pages
