Distinction Matter - Subscribed Feeds

  1. Site: OnePeterFive
    3 days 16 hours ago
    Author: T. S. Flanders

    Editor’s note: under the new pontificate of Pope Leo, we will now publish this monthly reminder of the proven, time-tested method to end heresy and the responsibility of every bishop for this, the “greatest act of charity.” Back in 2023, all orthodox Catholics of good will heard the news of His Excellency, Bishop Paprocki’s condemnation of heresy in one of the most prominent American journals…

    Source

  2. Site: AsiaNews.it
    3 days 16 hours ago
    Jomana Solman, project manager for the Syria Justice and Accountability Centre, told AsiaNews that no remains have been found where the Italian priest was abducted in 2013. The organisation continues to work on mass graves in northeastern Syria, but identifying remains is complex and expensive. A recent spate of fake news has fuelled hope among the families of the missing.
  3. Site: LifeNews
    3 days 16 hours ago
    Author: Emily Davis

    Remember when Taylor Swift’s last-minute endorsement of Kamala Harris won her the presidential election? Or remember how just calling something “brat” (inspired by singer Charli XCX) was enough to catapult voters into liking and voting for Democrats?

    Yeah, I don’t remember that happening either.

    That is why it is so maddening and confounding when the Left pulls celebrities out of a hole. Because it almost never works.

    Enter the latest tone-deaf Leftist experiment.

    Last week, 250 rich, elite celebrities, alongside Planned Parenthood, took out a full-page ad in the New York Times insisting we plebeians forcibly fund Planned Parenthood through our federal tax dollars. How is that for freedom?

    HELP LIFENEWS SAVE BABIES FROM ABORTION! Please help LifeNews.com with a donation!

    This has all the awareness of the peak cringe COVID-19 Imagine celebrity sing-along.

    According to Planned Parenthood’s exclusive Rolling Stone write-up, the celebrity campaign includes the following slogans: “I’m for Planned Parenthood. For Freedom. For Healthcare. For You and Me.”

    Here is why all that sloganeering is a load of rubbish.

    Planned Parenthood would not be paying tens of thousands of dollars and calling on over 200 celebrities for a New York Times ad, if they weren’t nervous about something. That nervousness stems from the fact that Democrats no longer oversee the federal purse. Rightfully so. The current administration and Congress recognize that Americans cannot sustain giving another $800 million to fund the largest abortion giant in the country.

    Last week, the House passed President Trump’s “One Big Beautiful” bill and as of today, it is with the Senate. As part of promises to cut waste, the bill stops hundreds of millions of forced taxpayer dollars to Big Abortion. Naturally, Planned Parenthood sees the writing on the wall. No longer will everyday Americans be forced to use their money to artificially keep this organization alive. They are crumbling and they know it.

    But don’t just take my word for it; take the word of the newspaper that they placed the ad in.

    In a direct counter to the campaign’s “For Healthcare” line, a recent article in theNew York Times argues that money is not being used to help patients, but rather to fund the politics of its abortion lobby. The grisly New York Timesstory features atrocious conditions at Planned Parenthood, like botched abortions and leaking sewage that caused patients to vomit. A Missouri branch was shut down for using moldy abortion equipmenton women. Staffers confessed to botching STI tests and not informing patients when they tested positive for sexually transmitted diseases. Story after story in the article shares testimony from staffers painting a scary reality on the ground. It leaves the reader without a doubt that Planned Parenthood lacks basic health and safety standards.

    However, the New York Times ad campaign emphasizes Planned Parenthood providing birth control, cancer screenings, STI testing, and then at the bottom of the list they mention abortions and trans treatments. But in Planned Parenthood’s recently released annual report, their own data confirms cancer screenings, pap smears and breast exams plummeted by 50%. Their STI testing was down 38%. In fact, the top three items were: abortion, transgender treatments, and political spending–those have all skyrocketed. Last year, they spent nearly $70 million to try and elect Kamala Harris and other Democrats.

    So, why on earth are our country’s richest and most famous clamoring for us to provide our hard-earned dollars to an organization that is actively causing harm to women and children? Your guess is as good as mine.

    What are we really looking at here? A flailing political machine desperate to rake in taxpayer dollars with glitter and hashtags, hoping we will be too dazzled to notice the rot underneath.

    But Americans are not stupid—we do not need Hollywood to tell us what health care is, or what it is not. We do not need millionaire activists lecturing us about “freedom” while demanding our money to fund an organization with a failing record and a partisan agenda. We all know that Hollywood Leftists love Planned Parenthood. But they should not demand that the rest of us foot the bill for their pet projects.

    The era of celebrity politics is over. The American people are wide awake—and we are not buying it.

    LifeNews Note: Emily Davis is the vice president of communications at the non-profit organization, Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America.

    The post We Don’t Care What a Bunch of Hollywood Liberals Say, Defund Planned Parenthood appeared first on LifeNews.com.

  4. Site: LifeNews
    3 days 16 hours ago
    Author: Susan Berry, Ph.D.

    About 250 Hollywood stars joined with Planned Parenthood last week in a full-page New York Times ad that called for continued taxpayer funding of the abortion industry giant.

    “I’m for Planned Parenthood,” proclaims the ad. The celebrities, among them singers Stevie Nicks, Sheryl Crow, and Cyndi Lauper, and actor George Lopez, cite three reasons for their support, including because they’re for “freedom” and for “health care.”

    Their third reason echoes Planned Parenthood’s common deceitful claim that they support getting “the government” out of decisions about abortion. In reality, Planned Parenthood and its allies are, in this very ad, pushing for all Americans to be forced, by the government, into paying for abortions.

    HELP LIFENEWS SAVE BABIES FROM ABORTION! Please help LifeNews.com with a donation!

    Former Planned Parenthood facility director-turned national pro-life activist Abby Johnson told CatholicVote the abortion lobby’s ploy of using leftwing Hollywood celebrities to influence Americans – who overwhelmingly voted for President Donald Trump in the last election – is futile.

    “This publicity stunt shows that the abortion industry has not learned its lesson from the past election,” said Johnson, the foundress of And Then There Were None and Pro-Love Ministries. “No one cares about celebrity endorsements of a multi-billion-dollar industry whose sole purpose is to destroy innocent life. It would be laughable if it didn’t deal with life and death. This isn’t what true empowerment of women looks like.”

    In an op-ed Monday at Fox News, Emily Davis, vice president of communications at Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, agreed.

    “The era of celebrity politics is over,” Davis asserted. “Enter the latest tone-deaf Leftist experiment.”

    The ad appeared in the wake of the House passing Trump’s “One Big Beautiful” bill and sending it along to the Senate. The bill cuts hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars to Planned Parenthood through Medicaid and grants. The abortion business’ latest annual report shows it took in $792.2 million in the form of these government health services reimbursements that Americans are forced to support through their taxes.

    “What are we really looking at here?” Davis asked. “A flailing political machine desperate to rake in taxpayer dollars with glitter and hashtags, hoping we will be too dazzled to notice the rot underneath.”

    Ironically, the ad appeared in the same New York Times that, in February, published a shocking report exposing numerous examples of Planned Parenthood’s alleged malpractice in performing abortions and other procedures.

    The report revealed allegations, uncovered by the Times through a review of clinic documents and legal filings, that include complaints claiming Planned Parenthood abortion facilities are operating with “aging equipment” and “poorly trained staff.” The malpractice complaints allege practices that endanger the lives of women.

    The Times report also revealed that, since the US Supreme Court’s 2022 decision overturning Roe v. Wade, Planned Parenthood “has enjoyed a fund-raising boom, with $498 million in donations” in that year alone.

    “But little of it goes to the state affiliates to provide health care at clinics,” the Times reported. “Instead, under the national bylaws, the majority of the money is spent on the legal and political fight to maintain abortion rights.”

    Additionally, Planned Parenthood has used taxpayer-funded grants to promote gender ideology in its “education” programs in government schools.

    report published Friday at the Daily Caller News Foundation revealed that, in the Philadelphia School District, nearly $40,000 in taxpayer funding was granted to Planned Parenthood Southeastern Pennsylvania by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to provide up to 79 training sessions that present biological sex as a “myth.”

    According to uncovered documents, the sessions, held during the 2023-2024 academic year, taught from the perspective that children should be able to receive medical intervention to live as the opposite sex, and that men who believe they are women should be allowed to compete with real women in sports.

    Planned Parenthood’s investment in gender ideology-based “education” is interesting, at best, in light of the fact that it’s now also one of the nation’s largest providers of cross-sex hormones.

    Lila Rose, foundress of Live Action, recently exposed Planned Parenthood’s alleged prescriptions of cross-sex hormones for minors via virtual appointments.

    Johnson argued that, by supporting the abortion industry in the New York Times ad, the Hollywood stars are once again missing a real opportunity to help women and their families.

    “When these celebrities wake up and start giving money and time to help women in desperate situations to get their lives back on track without taking the lives of their children, then let’s have a conversation,” the pro-life leader said. “Until then, I imagine Americans are using the NYT to start their summer campfires with families so at least the paper is being put to good use.”

    LifeNews Note: Susan Berry writes for CatholicVote, where this column originally appeared.

    The post Stevie Nicks, Sheryl Crow, and Cyndi Lauper Want to Force Americans to Fund Planned Parenthood appeared first on LifeNews.com.

  5. Site: Ron Paul Institute - Featured Articles
    3 days 17 hours ago
    Author: Rep. John J. Duncan Jr.

    For years, Jake Tapper, the leading newsreader for CNN, has been very unfair to and very biased against Republicans in general, and to President Trump in particular.

    Now, in an attempt to restore some of his lost credibility, he has written a new book with Alex Thompson of Axios about the Biden health cover-up.

    He apparently is embarrassed and/or feels guilty about all he did in a very partisan way to try to keep a very unhealthy Joe Biden in office as president, but I will give him credit for now admitting to some extent how wrong he was. Of course, he is putting most of the blame on the White House staff.

    I will not try to help Tapper in this personal campaign of his by buying his book. However, I have read and heard many things he has said and I have read some of the reviews.

    He said: “Alex and I are here to say that conservative media was right and conservative media was correct and that there should be a lot of soul-searching, not just among me, but among the legacy media.”

    In an interview with Piers Morgan, Tapper said the cover-up of Biden’s health by the White House, aided by Tapper and most of the national media, was “maybe even worse” than the Watergate scandal. In fact, he used those words three times in the interview.

    He added: “It is without question and maybe even worse than Watergate in some ways because Richard Nixon was in control of his faculties when he was not drinking.”

    In its story about Tapper’s book, the U.S. edition of the Daily Mail (a British newspaper), led this way: “CNN star Jake Tapper has been branded a ‘fraud’ and a ‘phony’ over his self-righteous rants about former President Joe Biden’s health cover up.”

    The story said “many believe the journalist was complicit in Biden’s cover up” and added that early reviews “were quickly overshadowed by allegations that Tapper himself was part of the cover up and is now seemingly trying to rewrite history.”

    The national media hated Trump so much that reporters were eager to jump on and exaggerate anything unfavorable to him and to emphasize anything favorable to Biden.

    Tapper’s book apparently says that Biden’s inner circle “couldn’t believe how easily (the media) swallowed campaign lies” and how eager reporters were to say something Trump said was false.

    Much of the mainstream media was doing everything it could to protect and promote Biden. They would never ask him tough questions or criticize him for not holding press conferences and for not having anything on his schedule.

    In the summer of 2023, the New York Times reported that “people who deal with him regularly, including some of his adversaries, say he remains sharp and commanding in private meetings” and “he has at times exerted striking stamina.”

    His two young press secretaries said at different times they were having trouble keeping up with him and that videos shown by Fox News and other conservative media were “deep fake.”

    Yet, several months before the election, the Biden campaign tried to film a town hall meeting to use on TV ads, but they couldn’t use it because, according to the Tapper book, Biden “couldn’t put together coherent thoughts.” The book also said Hunter Biden was “effectively chief of staff.”

    In a survey released on Dec. 30, 2023, Syracuse University’s School of Public Communications said the number of journalists identifying themselves as Republicans fell from 18% in 2002 and 7.1% in 2013 to only 3.4% in 2022.

    I received my journalism degree in 1969 and worked as a full-time reporter for the Knoxville Journal, our morning daily newspaper, during my senior year at U.T. in 1968-69. I taught journalism for one year. In those years, newspapers felt it was important to have a separation between the news pages and the editorial pages.

    They never would have allowed a reporter to use words like “obviously false” in what were supposed to be news stories unless some official made the accusation. Reporters were supposed to be reporters, not editorial writers, and especially not flunkies for one political party.

    Finally, not only did they hide the truth about Biden’s health, but Tapper and the national media also pushed the story that Russia had aided the 2016 Trump campaign. After paying 18 very anti-Trump lawyers for two years and spending many millions of taxpayer dollars, they found no proof at all of this Russian hoax.

    Reprinted with permission from Knoxville Focus.

  6. Site: LifeNews
    3 days 17 hours ago
    Author: Illinois Right to Life

    Illinois Right to Life is celebrating the close of the 2025 legislative session with a significant victory: the defeat of a dangerous Physician-Assisted Suicide (PAS) bill that would have legalized physician assisted suicide in our state.

    The Illinois Legislature attempted multiple strategies to push this bill through, including a legislative sleight of hand: after identical PAS bills stalled in both the House and Senate, proponents amended a food sanitation bill, stripping its original content and replacing it with PAS language. The maneuver allowed the bill to reach the House floor, where it passed. However, the Senate did not vote to concur with the amended language—effectively killing the bill for now.

    “This is a critical win for Illinois’ most vulnerable citizens,” said Mary Kate Zander, President of Illinois Right to Life. “Our lawmakers heard from thousands of Illinoisans who refused to allow death to become a state-sanctioned ‘treatment.’ We are grateful to our coalition partners, and most of all, to the countless constituents who made their voices heard. We give glory to God.”

    Get the latest pro-life news and information on X (Twitter). //

    Despite this victory, Illinois Right to Life is disappointed by the passage of two deeply troubling chemical abortion bills, both of which are now headed to the Governor’s desk.

    HB3709: Forced Promotion and Dispensing of Abortion Drugs on College Campuses

    This bill amends the Public Higher Education Act, forcing public universities to:

    • Provide access to abortionists authorized to prescribe chemical abortion drugs
    • Dispense these drugs through campus pharmacies
    • Promote chemical abortion on their official websites

    “These drugs starve preborn children to death and pose serious risks to women’s health,” said Mary Kate Zander. “No woman should be committing her own abortion alone in a dorm room. This bill not only endangers lives—it targets young women at one of their most vulnerable moments.”

    Unprecedented Defiance of Federal Drug Safety Standards

    In an unprecedented act of political overreach, Illinois lawmakers have decided they know better than the FDA. Apparently, when it comes to women’s health, politics trumps science.

    The Illinois Legislature passed a bill that will allow Illinois to ignore FDA safety decisions on chemical abortion pills—as long as the World Health Organization (WHO) supports their use.

    Illinois Right to Life remains committed to protecting women, children, and the medically vulnerable. We will continue to educate, advocate, and build a culture that respects every human life.

    The post Dangerous Illinois Bill to Legalize Assisted Suicide Has Been Defeated appeared first on LifeNews.com.

  7. Site: Ron Paul Institute - Featured Articles
    3 days 17 hours ago
    Author: Andrew P. Napolitano

    Last week, the Trump administration announced the streamlining of access to illegally seized personal data from unsuspecting Americans, thereby making warrantless domestic spying easier for the spies.

    Here is the backstory.

    The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees the right to privacy. Like other amendments in the Bill of Rights, it doesn’t create the right; it limits government interference with it. President Joe Biden often misquoted the late Justice Antonin Scalia suggesting that Justice Scalia believed that the Bill of Rights creates rights. As Justice Scalia wrote, referring to the right to keep and bear arms but reflecting his view on the origins of all personal liberty, the Bill of Rights secures rights; it doesn’t create them. It secures preexisting rights from interference by the government.

    Those who drafted the Bill of Rights recognized that human rights are pre-political. They preceded the existence of the government. They come from our humanity, and in the case of privacy, they are reinforced by our ownership or legal occupancy of property.

    The idea that rights come from our humanity is Natural Law theory, which was first articulated by Aristotle in 360 B.C. The natural law teaches that there are aspects of human existence and thus areas of human behavior that are not subject to the government. Aristotle’s views would later be refined by Cicero, codified by St. Thomas Aquinas, explained by John Locke, and woven into Anglo-American jurisprudence by British jurists and American revolutionaries and constitutional framers.

    Thus, our rights to think as we wish, to say what we think, to publish what we say, to worship or not, to associate or not, to defend ourselves from crazies and tyrants, to own property, and to be left alone are all hard-wired into our human nature by God, the uncaused cause. Nature is the means through which God passes along His gifts to us. We come about by a biological act of nature, every step of which was ordained by God.

    His greatest gift to us is life, and He tied that gift to free will. Just as He is perfectly free, so are we.

    In exercising our free wills, we employ rights. Rights are claims against the whole world. They don’t require approval of a government or neighbors or colleagues. The same human rights exist in everyone no matter their place of birth, and each person exercises them as she or he sees fit. The government should only come into the picture when someone violates another’s natural rights. So, if someone builds a house in your backyard, you can knock it down and expel the builders or you can ask the government to do so.

    Suppose the builders haven’t consented to the existence of the government? That does not absolve them. Though government is only moral and legal in a society in which all persons have consented to it — this is Thomas Jefferson’s “consent of the governed” argument in the Declaration of Independence — the poignant exception to actual consent is the use of government to remedy a violation of natural rights.

    Professor Murray Rothbard examined all this under his non-aggression principle (NAP): Initiating or threatening force or deception against a person or his rights is always morally illicit. This applies to all aggression, even — and especially — from the government. The folks building a house in your backyard have either used force or deception to get there. Both violate your natural rights and the NAP.

    Now, back to the Fourth Amendment and privacy. In a famous dissent in 1928, which two generations later became the law of the land, the late Justice Louis Brandeis argued that government surveillance constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment and thus, per the express language of the amendment, cannot be conducted by the government without a warrant issued by a judge. He famously called privacy the right most valued by civilized persons and described it as “the right to be let alone.”

    Today, this is the most violated of personal rights; not by judges signing search warrants for surveillance, but by government officials — local, state and federal — ignoring and evading the natural right to privacy and pretending that the Fourth Amendment does not apply to them. The linchpin of the amendment is the judicial determination of the existence of probable cause — meaning that it is more likely than not that a crime has been committed, and that there is evidence of that crime in the place to be searched and in the things to be seized.

    Today, the feds, and this has been picked up and mimicked by local and state police, have told themselves that so long as they are not looking for evidence of crimes, they needn’t follow the Fourth Amendment.

    Today, the government rarely bothers to obtain a search warrant for surveillance because it is cumbersome to do so and because it is so easy to surveil folks on a massive scale without one.

    Today, the National Security Agency — America’s 60,000-person strong domestic spying apparatus — captures every keystroke on every desktop and mobile device, and every conversation on every landline and mobile device, and all data transmitted into, out of or within the United States.

    Moreover, you’d be hard-pressed to find a geographic area that is not covered by police using hardware that tracks the movement and use of mobile phones. When Edward Snowden passed on to journalists the facts of massive warrantless spying in the Bush and Obama administrations, he had the journalists put their mobile devices where his was — in his refrigerator in his hotel room, as anywhere else would have alerted his former colleagues of their collective whereabouts.

    The government spends hundreds of billions of dollars annually just to watch and follow us. Who authorized this? Why do we tolerate it? Whatever the answers to these questions, warrantless spying on Americans just got a lot worse.

    To learn more about Judge Andrew Napolitano, visit https://JudgeNap.com.
    COPYRIGHT 2025 ANDREW P. NAPOLITANO
    DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM

  8. Site: Mises Institute
    3 days 17 hours ago
    Author: Ron Paul
  9. Site: Steyn Online
    3 days 17 hours ago
    Hello once again and welcome back to another batch of Laura's Links. The timing of this week's column worked out well because earlier in the week it was the Jewish holiday of Shavuot, so I was quite busy with preparations and of course, scarfing down
  10. Site: Zero Hedge
    3 days 17 hours ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    Dark Irony: 75th Anniversary Edition Of Orwell's 1984 Comes With Trigger Warnings

    Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity.news,

    A new 75th anniversary edition of George Orwell’s dystopian classic 1984 includes ‘trigger warnings’ in the introduction written by an American professor.

    The College Fix reports that the warning comes:

    Courtesy of Dolen Perkins-Valdez, who according to her website has “established herself as a pre-eminent chronicler of American historical life,”and teaches literature at American University.

    According to the report, the introduction, authorised by the Orwell estate, makes note that “there are no Black characters at all” in the novel.

    What? Why is this relevant to the book?

    I'll have to wait till I finish my read to see exactly what you are referring to, but I took a look at the introductory essay by Dolen Perkins-Valdez, and am in dismay at aspects of it:

    "That sliver of connection can be difficult for someone like me to find in a novel that does… pic.twitter.com/NPMPaSmi51

    — Mark Blair (@mblair) June 2, 2025

    When Orwell wrote the novel in the late 1940s, black people made up less than 1% of the English population.

    The report adds:

    For a “contemporary reader” such as herself, Perkins-Valdez says this gives her “pause.” She also says a “sliver of connection” is difficult with a book that “does not speak much to race and ethnicity.”

    Yeah, the novel isn’t supposed to be about race and ethnicity.

    In your world where you have to make absolutely everything about race, this book isn’t going to connect.

    It is all she knows how to do: look for herself in other people's stories. Use her own racial identity as a lens through which to judge (not truly evaluate, but judge) everything she encounters. This sort of narcissism is endemic.

    — Brian Patrick Eha (@brianeha) June 3, 2025

    Perkins-Valdez continues, “I’m enjoying the novel on its own terms, not as a classic but as a good story. That is, until Winston [Smith] reveals himself to be a problematic character.”

    Yeah. He’s supposed to be. But in what way do you mean?

    “For example, we learn of him he dislikes nearly all women. And especially the young and pretty ones,” she further explains.

    Faceplam.

    “Winston’s views on women are, at first, despicable for the contemporary reader. He is the kind of character that can make me put a book down,” she adds. 

    Imagine if Orwell had instead written Winston as a woke liberal policing his own thoughts. The Party wouldn’t even need Big Brother.

    Journalist Matt Taibbi, along with his podcast host Walter Kirn pointed out how idiotic this all is, given that the book is a warning about the erosion of language and freedom of thought.

    In which you will learn that the current leading paperback version of 1984, its official Orwell-estate-approved 75th anniversary edition, includes a 1984-ish trigger-warning introduction calling the novel's hero "problematic" because of his "misogyny."

    I am not making this up. https://t.co/U9UAR3dsdQ

    — Walter Kirn (@walterkirn) June 2, 2025

    The 1984 part of the discussion begins at 1 hour 36 mins:

    America This Week, Live on Monday 6-2-25 https://t.co/Lc1K4WEGC1

    — Matt Taibbi (@mtaibbi) June 2, 2025

    The material in 1984 is supposed to be traumatising, that’s the entire point of the book. Putting trigger warnings on it is ludicrous and only proves Orwell was prescient.

    Having this drivel as an introduction to one of the most iconic dystopian works of literature is like something out of Idiocracy.

    It mirrors the novel’s own warnings about ideological conformity and the rewriting of art to appease dogmatic sensitivities.

    It’s insulting.

    Who on Earth commissioned it?

    Perhaps the same people who agreed to a politically correct modern day re-write of 1984 from a feminist perspective.

    *  *  *

    Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.

    Tyler Durden Thu, 06/05/2025 - 09:45
  11. Site: AsiaNews.it
    3 days 18 hours ago
    The measure was introduced in 1989 after the war to reduce the pressure on scarce resources. Removing the limit is meant to reverse the declining birthrate and the aging of the population. The drop is not uniform and affects mainly large centres like Ho Chi Minh City.
  12. Site: LifeNews
    3 days 18 hours ago
    Author: Nathan Moelker, Liam Harrell

    The ACLJ is taking decisive action to defend the constitutional rights of pro-life advocates who faced discriminatory enforcement and wrongful arrest for peacefully exercising their First Amendment freedoms. We’ve told you about our defense of the Knotts family, who faced criminal charges for simply advocating for the lives of unborn babies outside an abortion clinic. As the trial began, with a packed courtroom watching, the prosecution folded. It dismissed the wrongful criminal charges entirely.

    Now we’ve gone on the offensive to defend pro-life advocacy. We’ve filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of Zack and Lindsay Knotts, challenging their unconstitutional arrest and an unconstitutional city ordinance that silences disfavored speakers while protecting those with opposing viewpoints.

    The Story So Far

    What happened to the Knotts family in Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio, represents a textbook case of viewpoint discrimination – an egregious violation of the First Amendment. The shocking details of their treatment reveal a deliberate pattern of government censorship based solely on the content of their pro-life message.

    Get the latest pro-life news and information on X (Twitter). //

    On December 28, 2024, the Knotts traveled to the Northeast Ohio Women’s Center, an abortion clinic, to peacefully exercise their First Amendment rights, engaging in sidewalk evangelism and pro-life advocacy. What happened next exposed a troubling pattern of government officials weaponizing local ordinances to silence religious and pro-life speech.

    Zack used a battery-powered megaphone – quieter than ambient traffic noise – to share his life-affirming message from a public sidewalk. Meanwhile, abortion clinic escorts actively worked to drown out his speech using their own sound devices, including whistles and kazoos, while making threats against the couple.

    One escort even told Zack to “suck-start a shotgun.” During a previous encounter, Zack had told escorts how his mother-in-law had considered an abortion while pregnant with his now wife, and if she had gone through with it, his wife “should be dead.” An escort interrupted, stating, “We can fix that.”

    Despite this harassment and the escorts’ use of the same types of sound devices prohibited by the city’s noise ordinance, only Zack was arrested and cited.

    The Discriminatory Arrest

    The circumstances of Zack’s arrest reveal the true motivation behind the police action:

    1. A Biased Complaint: A nearby resident supposedly called the police complaining specifically about Zack’s pro-life message – notably, she did not complain about the escorts’ kazoos and whistles, only the pro-life speech.
    2. No Firsthand Witness: The arresting officers, Sergeant Dobney and Officer Paratore, never personally witnessed Zack using the megaphone. By the time they arrived, the megaphone’s batteries had already died. So they could not possibly have known if his megaphone was loud enough to violate the ordinance – which it wasn’t.
    3. A Biased Investigation: The police only took a statement from Officer Oldham, who was working off-duty as private security for the abortion clinic – creating an obvious conflict of interest. No other witnesses were questioned.
    4. Selective Enforcement: Despite knowledge of the escorts’ threats, noise-making, and harassment, only Zack was arrested, cited, and prosecuted.
    5. Chilling Threats: When Lindsay tried to report the threats against her husband, she was told they were “not a crime.” Sergeant Dobney then threatened that Zack would be arrested again if he caused “annoyance” in the future – even without amplified sound.

    The impact of this unconstitutional enforcement extends far beyond one arrest. The Knotts now fear exercising their constitutional rights, knowing they face arrest while their opponents remain free to engage in identical or worse conduct. This chilling effect on protected speech is precisely what the First Amendment was designed to prevent. When citizens must self-censor their constitutionally protected speech due to fear of government retaliation, the Constitution has been violated.

    An Ordinance Designed To Discriminate

    Cuyahoga Falls’ Ordinance § 509.03(a)(6) prohibits amplified sound that might cause “inconvenience or annoyance to persons of ordinary sensibilities” – vague language that invites arbitrary enforcement. But the biggest constitutional problem lies in the ordinance’s exemptions, which favor certain organizations while discriminating against individual citizens. The law specifically exempts amplified sound from educational organizations and charitable organizations, for example.

    This creates an impermissible hierarchy of speakers, in direct violation of the First Amendment. The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that the government cannot grant preferred status to certain speakers while silencing others, especially in traditional public forums like sidewalks.

    Three Constitutional Violations, One Clear Pattern of Discrimination

    Our lawsuit challenges this discriminatory ordinance on several constitutional grounds. In our motion for preliminary injunction, we reveal three distinct ways Cuyahoga Falls’ ordinance violates the Constitution:

    1.   Facial Invalidity Under the First Amendment: The ordinance’s speaker-based exemptions transform what should be a content-neutral noise regulation into an unconstitutional content-based restriction on speech. Such regulations are presumptively unconstitutional and subject to strict scrutiny – a test this ordinance clearly fails. This creates a two-tiered system where politically favored institutions can use amplification freely, but individual citizens exercising their constitutional rights cannot.
    2.    Unconstitutional Vagueness: The ordinance prohibits causing “inconvenience, annoyance, or alarm” through “unreasonable noise” – but fails to define any of these subjective terms. What constitutes “unreasonable noise”? What level of “annoyance” triggers enforcement? The law provides no guidance, leaving enforcement entirely to the personal discretion of police officers.This vagueness creates exactly the kind of arbitrary enforcement we witnessed: Zack’s amplified pro-life message was deemed “unreasonable,” while equally loud pro-abortion counter-protesters using musical instruments specifically mentioned in the ordinance faced no consequences.
    3.   Viewpoint Discrimination: The selective enforcement against pro-life speakers while tolerating identical or worse conduct from pro-abortion advocates constitutes impermissible viewpoint discrimination. Most troubling of all is the selective enforcement pattern. The Knotts and abortion escorts were engaged in directly comparable conduct – using sound devices to amplify their messages on the same public sidewalk. Yet only the pro-life speakers faced arrest and prosecution.When Lindsay informed officers about the threats made against them, she was told these statements were “not a crime” – while her husband sat in the back of a police cruiser for using a megaphone.

    One of the central cases we rely on to defend pro-life advocates is our very own victory against an abortion buffer zone law in Louisville, Kentucky. That court decision requiring an injunction against a speech-suppressing buffer zone is crucial to holding the government accountable for vague laws that infringe on speech. The First Amendment demands that pro-life advocates have their rights protected.

    Why This Case Matters

    This lawsuit represents more than just one family’s fight for justice – it’s about preserving fundamental constitutional principles that protect all Americans.

    The government prosecuted Zack for months before ultimately dismissing the case on the day of trial – but only after the constitutional damage was done. The arrest, prosecution, and ongoing threat of future enforcement have already achieved the government’s apparent goal: silencing disfavored speech.

    This case exemplifies why the ACLJ exists: to defend the constitutional rights of Americans against government overreach and discrimination. We refuse to allow local officials to use vague ordinances as weapons against unpopular speech, and we will not stand by while religious and pro-life voices are silenced through selective enforcement.

    The First Amendment doesn’t guarantee freedom from annoyance or inconvenience – it guarantees freedom of speech, especially for unpopular viewpoints that challenge the status quo. When government officials start deciding which messages deserve protection based on their own preferences, we’re all at risk.

    Our lawsuit seeks:

    • A declaration that the ordinance is unconstitutional
    • An injunction preventing future discriminatory enforcement
    • Compensation for constitutional violations
    • Return of Zack’s seized megaphone
    • Attorney’s fees under federal civil rights law

    The Broader Battle for Religious Freedom

    This case is part of a larger assault on religious freedom and pro-life speech across America. From college campuses to city sidewalks, government officials are increasingly willing to silence religious viewpoints while protecting secular ones.

    The Supreme Court of the United States has repeatedly affirmed that the First Amendment does not permit the government to make such distinctions. In Reed v. Town of Gilbert, the Court emphasized that content-based restrictions on speech are presumptively unconstitutional. In Rosenberger v. University of Virginia, the Supreme Court held that viewpoint discrimination is an “egregious form of content discrimination.”

    These precedents are clear: The government cannot silence speakers based on the religious or political content of their message.

    The Knotts family courageously chose to stand up for their constitutional rights rather than submit to government censorship. Their willingness to challenge this discrimination in federal court will help protect the rights of all Americans to engage in peaceful religious and political expression.

    Your support enables the ACLJ to take on these critical cases without charging our clients, ensuring that constitutional rights aren’t limited to those who can afford expensive litigation. Together, we can continue fighting for the fundamental freedoms that make America exceptional.

    LifeNews Note: Nathan Moelker is Senior Associate Counsel at the ACLJ’s Washington, D.C. office. Liam R. Harrell is Associate Counsel at the American Center for Law & Justice (ACLJ) Washington, D.C., office.

    The post Pro-Life Advocate Fights Back After He’s Arrested for Preaching Gospel Outside Abortion Biz appeared first on LifeNews.com.

  13. Site: Rorate Caeli
    3 days 18 hours ago
     From reader N.A. in Sweden, in a letter sent to friends and acquaintances of John Bogärde, a pioneer of the revival of the Traditional Latin Mass in Sweden and a father of seven, who recently passed away at 44: I would also like to share with you these photos from John's funeral. It was such an astonishing and moving experience. The Requiem Mass was celebrated in the Church of Husaby; New Catholichttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04118576661605931910noreply@blogger.com
  14. Site: Mises Institute
    3 days 18 hours ago
    Author: Thomas J. DiLorenzo
    If we really want America to be "great" it must first be free.
  15. Site: Mises Institute
    3 days 18 hours ago
    Author: Ryan McMaken
  16. Site: LifeNews
    3 days 18 hours ago
    Author: Matthew Clark

    The numbers coming out of Planned Parenthood’s recently released annual report are horrifically vulgar. One thing is undeniably clear to anyone brave enough to look under the hood: Despite its lies, Planned Parenthood’s core business is abortion. Yet Planned Parenthood desperately throws up smokescreens, attempting to mask the reality that abortion remains its primary focus – and its most profitable one.

    The abortion behemoth would like you to believe otherwise. The problem for Planned Parenthood is that the numbers just don’t lie.

    Gone are the days of maintaining a facade of providing comprehensive healthcare. Planned Parenthood’s sharp decline in non-abortion services continues to drop like a rock. Fewer resources than ever are being devoted to life-affirming services or preventative care despite the massive increases in taxpayer funding.

    Record-Breaking Numbers for Killing Babies

    In its latest annual report, paradoxically titled “A Force for Hope,” Planned Parenthood appears to be living its best life, boasting about the 402,230 babies it killed last year – an all-time high for abortions. This represents roughly 40% of all abortions performed in the United States during the same period. Regrettably, the organization has brought anything but “hope” to the women it targets, to those damaged by abortion, and not to mention the millions of babies who don’t make it out of a Planned Parenthood clinic alive.

    LifeNews is on GETTR. Please follow us for the latest pro-life news

    Disturbingly, this increase occurred after the Dobbs decision that overturned Roe v. Wade. Even as many states restricted abortions, Planned Parenthood found a way to end more lives.

    Also worthy of note, through Planned Parenthood Direct, which sounds like a diabolical subscription service of death, it speedily provided an additional 560,000 “emergency contraception kits” – code for abortion pills like the morning-after pill – an increase over the previous year. As we’ve explained before, Planned Parenthood does not count these potential abortifacients (any drug or chemical that induces abortion) in its abortion total. Yet we know that “emergency contraception kits” will be used to end the lives of innocent babies.

    And to further their abortion numbers, Planned Parenthood has continued its new niche in the post-Dobbs era: abortion tourism. According to the report, in its second year of providing such services, it spent over $3.4 million in “direct patient assistance” to help transport 12,500 women across state lines to kill their babies – a disturbing practice tailor-made for sex traffickers. This support covered not just the abortion procedure but also transportation, meals, hotel stays, and even dependent care. On average, that’s $275 per baby to help facilitate the death of an unborn child.

    Taxpayer Funding Ballooned Under the Biden Administration

    As Americans struggled with inflation and worked harder than ever just to get groceries into their refrigerators, Biden and his political allies threw huge amounts of funding at Planned Parenthood as it raked in nearly $800 million in taxpayer dollars – also an all-time high. The jump in taxpayer funds received by Planned Parenthood last year was game-changing for the organization, receiving nearly 12% more than the previous year. To put that into perspective, this single-year surge in taxpayer support nearly matches the total increase Planned Parenthood saw over the previous five-year span (2018–2023).

    For the first time, it directly admitted that this massive influx of taxpayer dollars increases abortions. In response to the House of Representatives voting to defund the abortion giant, Planned Parenthood actually put out a press release stating, “If this bill passes, people will lose access to essential, often lifesaving care – cancer screenings, birth control, STI testing, and yes, abortion.”

    Shockingly, Planned Parenthood actually said the quiet part out loud.

    This statement admits what pro-abortion groups often deny: that abortion is included in the “essential” care funded by taxpayers. By warning that abortion access is threatened if funding is cut, it proves that tax dollars are directly tied to abortion services. It exposes the reality that defunding Planned Parenthood would impact abortion – confirming our tax dollars support the killing of unborn babies.

    Cancer Screenings Take a Back Seat at Planned Parenthood

    Planned Parenthood is also engaged in a bold-faced lie. While publicly claiming that defunding the abortion giant would cause “people [to] lose . . . cancer screenings,” the data tells a VERY different story. Since 2009, Planned Parenthood’s cancer screenings have dropped by 76% (with last year being the second-lowest on record), even as their taxpayer revenue has nearly doubled during the same time period – even as cancer diagnoses have exploded among our population. In the most recent report, pap tests and breast exams amounted to just 364,600 services – a shockingly low number for an organization that claims to care about women’s health. In comparison, abortion accounted for nearly as many services (402,230) as all cancer screenings combined.

    Breast exams have especially seen a significant drop. Planned Parenthood performed a paltry 191,000 exams in 2024 – a 77% drop since 2009, while breast cancer diagnoses nationwide have increased year after yearThat’s a troubling trend – and one that Planned Parenthood should be embarrassed to be on the wrong side of. Planned Parenthood continues to tell us it is focused on women’s health and not abortions. Yet the more money we give it, the less “good” it does and the more babies it kills.

    The Trend for Non-Abortion Services Is Ugly

    Consider these additional categories that saw steep declines in services – all while Planned Parenthood received a record amount of government funding. This stark contrast raises serious questions about priorities and accountability. If taxpayer dollars are at an all-time high, why are lifesaving services at an all-time low?

    • Since 2009, Planned Parenthood has seen a 76% drop in prenatal services such as ultrasounds. The last thing Planned Parenthood wants is for the mother to connect with her baby via ultrasound. According to the Lozier Institute, 75% of women at risk for abortion will deliver their baby after viewing an ultrasound.
    • Adoption referral numbers, another life-affirming alternative, tell a similar story. Last year, Planned Parenthood made just 2,148 adoption referrals. That’s roughly 1 referral for every 187 abortions performed. In 2011, that ratio was 1 to 145. The numbers speak for themselves, and they reflect a growing neglect of options that don’t end in abortion. So much for being pro “choice.”
    • Since 2016, Planned Parenthood has seen a 42% drop in well-woman exams and preventative care visits.
    • A drop of 75% in colposcopy procedures, or cervical exams, since 2009.
    • 129,594 preventive care visits were performed in 2024, down nearly 43% since 2016.

    As its latest report affirms, Planned Parenthood isn’t going down easily. In the wake of the undercover videos that exposed Planned Parenthood’s gruesome sale of aborted babies’ body parts, individual states across the country said enough was enough. They took legal and legislative action to defund Planned Parenthood – to stop giving our money to the abhorrent abortion industry. One of the first was South Carolina, which sought to block state taxpayer funds, or Medicaid reimbursements, from supporting abortion clinics, prompting an immediate federal lawsuit by Planned Parenthood.

    That case, Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, is now before the U.S. Supreme Court, and we filed an amicus brief supporting South Carolina. The case challenges whether individual Medicaid recipients can sue states that disqualify abortion providers like Planned Parenthood from Medicaid funding. In our amicus brief, we argue that post-Dobbs, abortion policy and funding decisions should lie with the states. Forcing states to fund abortion providers undermines state sovereignty and violates the principles of the Medicaid Act. We expect a decision by the end of June.

    In addition, we are urging Congress to pass legislation defunding Planned Parenthood at the federal level. Not another dime of our money should go to a deceptive killing machine like Planned Parenthood.

    The ACLJ is battling Planned Parenthood and the abortion industry from multiple directions. We are defending pro-life advocates whose constitutional rights are criminalized and whose voices are silenced. We are not only filing to defend Pregnancy Resource Centers but also running PR campaigns to counter state-sponsored smear campaigns. In a post-Dobbs world, we are battling in the states to protect pro-life policies through the implementation of a multi-state effort. And, of course, we are exhausting all avenues to defund Planned Parenthood of our taxpayer dollars – once and for all.

    The ACLJ has been relentlessly battling for the unborn for 35 years, and we have no plans of slowing down in our pursuit of justice for all, born or unborn. Join us.

    LifeNews Note:  Matthew Clark writes for the American Center for Law and Justice and is a staff attorney.

    The post Planned Parenthood Kills More Babies, Cancer Screenings Drop 79%, Breast Exams Drop 77% appeared first on LifeNews.com.

  17. Site: Zero Hedge
    3 days 18 hours ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    US Trade Deficit Shrinks By Most On Record In April As Imports Plunged

    As the front-running of tariffs abruptly ended, so imports to the US collapsed in April - by the most on record - shrinking the trade deficit by the most on record...

    Source: Bloomberg

    The gap in goods and services trade shrank 55.5% from the prior month, to $61.6 billion, the smallest since 2023 and more than completely reversing the sharp widening that occurred in the first quarter.

    Imports of goods and services declined a record 16.3% in April, while exports increased 3%.

    Source: Bloomberg

    The April trade report showed imports of consumer goods slumped $33 billion, largely due to a sharp decline in inbound shipments of pharmaceutical preparations.

    Imports from China plunged to their lowest since March 2020...

    Source: Bloomberg

    ...shrinking the trade deficit with China to its smallest since March 2020...

    Source: Bloomberg

    Canadian exports plunged by the most in nearly 17 years outside of the pandemic, widening the country’s merchandise trade deficit to the largest on record. The deficit far exceeded even the most pessimistic projection in a Bloomberg survey of economists.

    Source: Bloomberg

    The sharp narrowing in April puts trade on track for a large contribution to US GDP in Q2 after being largely responsible for a 0.2% annualized decline in first-quarter GDP. We look forward to The Atlanta Fed 'adjusting' their GDPNOW model again...

    Tyler Durden Thu, 06/05/2025 - 08:49
  18. Site: Rorate Caeli
    3 days 18 hours ago
    On the occasion of the consecration of the pilgrimage, a traditional mass was celebrated in the prestigious church of the Madeleine (Saint Mary Magdalen), in Paris. [Source: Notre-Dame de Chrétienté X account]New Catholichttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04118576661605931910noreply@blogger.com
  19. Site: PaulCraigRoberts.org
    3 days 19 hours ago
    Author: pcr3

    Israel’s Two-bit Punk American Puppet

    The United States has vetoed a draft UN Security Council resolution demanding a permanent ceasefire in Gaza and calling for removing Israel’s restrictions on aid deliveries to starving Palestinians.

    https://sputnikglobe.com/20250605/us-vetoes-unsc-draft-resolution-calling-for-gaza-ceasefire-1122194134.html 

  20. Site: PaulCraigRoberts.org
    3 days 19 hours ago
    Author: pcr3

    Lenin’s Question Is the Question of Our Time

    Paul Craig Roberts

    Now that some total idiot in the Trump regime has green-lighted an attack on Russian strategic forces, John Helmer raises for Putin Lenin’s question, “What is to be done?”  

    As I understand it, Washington’s attack on Russian strategic forces is grounds under current Russian war doctrine for Putin to push the button.  But Putin, unlike Lenin, is a balancer, not a person who acts.  Is Putin so desperate to avoid war that he is bringing war upon us?

    There seems to be more awareness among Russian people than in Washington and Europe of the seriousness of the situation.  With too long of a wait, it eventually dawned on the White House that Trump must be disassociated from the attack, as otherwise the attack is easily interpreted as Washington’s declaration of war on Russia.  According to the White House announcement, Trump was not informed in advance of the attack on the Russian strategic bombing fleet, which in keeping with the treaty is kept lined up openly on air fields. One problem with this disavowal is that the Secretary of State or the Defense Secretary reportedly watched via the digital revolution the attack as it happened. So Trump’s government knew, but Trump didn’t?

    What confidence does the attack on Russian strategic forces  give Putin that Trump is sincere about peace negotiations?

    Why does Trump announce constructing a trillion dollar dome to protect the US from incoming missiles when the costless alternative is a mutual security agreement, a great power agreement, with Russia and China?  The answer is that the US military/security complex wants the money.  The dome will be useless, because hypersonic missiles on random jig-jag trajectories cannot be intercepted.  If Trump is the peace president, why not simply agree to a mutual security agreement?

    Another problem with the White House’s disavowal is Trump’s competence as president. Let’s examine the implication of President Trump not being informed of an attack that under Russian war doctrine is sufficient to launch nuclear missiles against the United States and Europe.  How can it be that it is not in the hands of the President of the United States whether or not to undertake a military action that could initiate nuclear war?  Is this a sign of President Trump’s incompetence or of his irrelevance?

    It is not only the White House that is making light of a stupid action that could have unleashed nuclear war, but also all of Washington, Western Europe, and the Western whore media, a collection of despicable people who lie for their living. We are facing an existential threat to the continued existence of life on earth and the idiot whore media is telling us about some celebrity’s concern with her sex life.

    From the beginning of Putin’s ever-widening, never-ending war over a few kilometers in the Russian provinces Communist officials assigned to Ukraine I have said that Putin’s unwillingness to use sufficient force to terminate the conflict would result in opportunities for the US and NATO to become involved in the conflict with their prestige involved.  Consequently, the conflict would spin out of control, which it came close to doing with the attack on Russian strategic forces.  

    How many non-responses to provocations can Putin survive?  Are Russians so Westernized and brainwashed that they have no national pride?  Are they willing to be humiliated forever by leadership that declares red lines but always turns the other cheek?  Why is no one in the West concerned with these serious questions?  Is it because no one takes Russia seriously? Is Putin causing World War III because he has convinced the West not to take Russia seriously?

    Washington’s neoconservatives might succeed in destabilizing Putin, considering all the help Putin is giving them, but will his replacement be an American puppet or a person of action capable of recognizing an enemy when he sees one?  No intelligent Russian would sacrifice Russian lives in order to make unrealizable peace deals with people determined to destroy Russia. On what grounds can Russians believe in any agreement with the West?  

    If Putin is replaced by a Lenin, the Western World is over and done with.

    We are watching the Trump regime fall apart. Elon Musk, one tower of strength, has left.  Russian strategic forces are attacked, and Trump doesn’t know about it.  Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Secretary of Health and Human Services,  announces that the deadly Covid vax will no longer be recommended for pregnant women and healthy children.  The head of the CDC, a subordinate to the Secretary of Health and Human Services, gives the finger to his boss and announces that the Covid vax will be recommended for pregnant women and healthy children.  Robert Kennedy announces that no vaccines will be approved without tests, and the CDC approves Big Pharma’s vaccine without the tests.  

    In other words, there is no Trump Administration in place.  The Establishment rules.  Trump and his government are irrelevant. Trump does the bidding of Israel and the military/security complex. Big Pharma, not Secretary Robert Kennedy, makes the decisions.  Elon Musk gives up and goes home.  The FBI director validates the unbelievable Epstein suicide narrative.  The Trump Justice Department has held no one accountable for the attempted frame-up of President Trump by the CIA and FBI.  Attorney General Bondi says weaponized law is halted, but as those responsible have not been held accountable, the Democrats will again weaponize law.  The media remains weaponized.

    I warned that this would be the result.  I repeat what I wrote when Trump was making his comeback without opposition from the ruling establishment. The American Establishment decided to let Trump again be president.  The Establishment knew that they could use the judiciary, the civil service, and Trump appointees who would betray Trump for success in the Establishment.  I saw all of this in the Reagan administration with appointees, few being Reagan’s, betraying him for their advancement in the Ruling Establishment

    The Establishment reasoned that the easiest way to eliminate “populist opposition” is to put their leader in the presidency, block him at every turn, thereby demoralizing his supporters. With their hope eviscerated, defeated people go home and accept whatever happens.

    Trump was America’s last chance.  If he were a young Julius Caesar, he might have succeeded.  But like Julius Caesar, the Establishment was against him.  Trump’s entire government consists of Israel’s puppets.  They will do anything for Israel and little for America.  The Zionist Trump regime has again vetoed a UN Security Council resolution against Israel’s on-going slaughter of Palestinians by bullets, bombs, starvation, and disease.  War with Iran can still result from Iran’s refusals of Trump’s dictates that serve Israel’s interest.  We still await the problems that the Trump regime will create with China.

    Dear readers, you can expect war.  No one in the Western World, nor Putin, has sufficient intelligence to avoid it.  It is just a matter of time.  

  21. Site: Zero Hedge
    3 days 19 hours ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    US Jobless Claims Surge To 8 Month Highs

    The number of Americans filing for jobless benefits for the first time jumped to 247k last week (above the 239k expected) - the highest since October 2024...

    Source: Bloomberg

    A breakdown of weekly claims changes finds the biggest increases in Kentucky and Minnesota, and the biggest drops in Michigan and Florida.

    Continuing claims remain above the 1.9 million Americans level for the second week in a row...

    Source: Bloomberg

    ...with the DOGE-inspired 'Deep Tristate' region seeing claims surge to their highest since Dec 2021...

    Source: Bloomberg

    Despite Musk's obvious disappointment at the One Big Beautiful Bill's lack of spending cuts, he can be proud that he did his part to shrink the workforce of the leviathan...

    Tyler Durden Thu, 06/05/2025 - 08:38
  22. Site: Zero Hedge
    3 days 19 hours ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    ECB Cuts Rates by 25bps As Expected, Slashes 2026 Inflation Forecast

    As expected by 52 out of 52 economists, and as fully priced in by the market, the ECB just cut deposits rates by 25bps to 2.00%, the 8th consecutive cut and one which will hardly make Trump any happier that the Fed still remains on hold. 

    According to UBS, the ECB statement set a hawkish tone in that the central bank seems content with the inflation outlook and doesn't express any concerns about inflation undershooting.

    The ECB said in the statement: "Most measures of underlying inflation suggest that inflation will settle at around the Governing Council’s 2% medium-term target on a sustained basis". It also said inflation "is currently at around the Governing Council’s 2% medium-term target".

    It also said that wage growth is still elevated but continues to moderate visibly, and profits are partially buffering its impact on inflation. Meanwhile, "the concerns that increased uncertainty and a volatile market response to the trade tensions in April would have a tightening impact on financing conditions have eased".

    Taking a closer look at the ECB statement:

    STANCE:

    • Repeats will follow a data-dependent and meeting-by-meeting approach to determining the appropriate monetary policy stance
    • Repeats not pre-committing to a particular rate path

    TRADE:

    • While the uncertainty surrounding trade policies is expected to weigh on business investment and exports, especially in the short term, rising government investment in defence and infrastructure will increasingly support growth over the medium term

    LABOR MARKET:

    • Higher real incomes and a robust labor market will allow households to spend more.
    • Together with more favorable financing conditions, this should make the economy more resilient to global shocks.

    MACRO PROJECTIONS:

    • Lowers headline 2025 and 2026 inflation forecasts, raises 2025 core inflation forecast; 2025 growth unchanged
    • In the context of high uncertainty, staff also assessed some of the mechanisms by which different trade policies could affect growth and inflation under some alternative illustrative scenarios
    • Under this scenario analysis, a further escalation of trade tensions over the coming months would result in growth and inflation being below the baseline projections.
    • By contrast, if trade tensions were resolved with a benign outcome, growth and, to a lesser extent, inflation would be higher than in the baseline projections.

    HICP INFLATION:

    • 2025: 2.0% (prev. 2.3%)
    • 2026: 1.6% (prev. 1.9%)
    • 2027: 2.0% (prev. 2.0%)

    HICP CORE INFLATION (EX-ENERGY & FOOD):

    • 2025: 2.4% (prev. 2.2%)
    • 2026: 1.9% (prev. 2.0%)
    • 2027: 1.9% (prev. 1.9%)

    GDP:

    • 2025: 0.9% (prev. 0.9%)
    • 2026: 1.1% (prev. 1.2%)
    • 2027:1.3% (prev. 1.3%)

    To recap: the central bank revised down its headline CPI forecast for 2025 and 2026 by 0.3% to 2% and 1.6%, respectively, due to energy prices. 2027 headline inflation outlook is unchanged. Meanwhile, the central bank kept its core CPI forecasts unchanged. Core CPI is expected to be average 2.4% in 2025 and 1.9% in 2026 and 2027. Also, the central bank kept its GDP forecast unchanged. Staff see real GDP growth averaging 0.9% in 2025, 1.1% in 2026 and 1.3% in 2027.

    Of the above, perhaps the most notable highlight is and the most important change was the sharp downward revision of the 2026 inflation forecast to 1.6% from 1.9%.

    * * * 

    Earlier:

    As UBS economist Paul Donovan writes this morning, a total of 52 out of 52 surveyed economists - not to mention markets - expect a quarter point ECB rate reduction today, the 8th in a row, adding rhetorically "How could so many economists possibly be wrong?" More to the point, he adds that President Trump is likely to become even more irate after criticizing the Federal Reserve for not cutting rates. 

    Rhetorical questions aside, here is what to expected, courtesy of Newsquawk

    OVERVIEW: Given the uncertainties surrounding the trade outlook and progress on the inflation front, the ECB is expected to cut the  deposit Rate by 25bps to 2.00%. With a rate reduction nailed on, focus will be on any hints over future easing plans. While Lagarde might not make any explicit mention of the future policy direction, any signs of dissent, whether via remarks by the President or sources after the meeting, could provide a guiding star for markets. Currently, markets see a total of 54bps of loosening by year-end (including the expected June cut).

    PRIOR MEETING: Aprilʼs meeting saw a 25bps cut as expected and the old language around restrictiveness was removed. This took the ECB to the top end of its 1.75-2.25% neutral rate estimate. Accompanying forward guidance was unsurprisingly non-committal, though the statement did highlight increased uncertainty and an associated confidence impact that is “likely to have a tightening impact on financing conditions”; on this, participants were attentive to any hints around an offsetting policy response (i.e. dovish action). Just after the meeting, sources reported the decision to cut was unanimous. Lagarde didnʼt add too much, aside from stressing no argument was made for 50bps or other stimulus, though she made the point that they are viewing tariffs as a demand shock.

    RECENT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTS : Flash inflation data for May saw Y/Y HICP decline to 1.9% from 2.2% (below target for the first time since September 2024). Core inflation declined to 2.4% from 2.7%, whilst services inflation saw a notable fall to 3.7% from 4.0%. The ECB Consumer Expectations Survey for April saw the 12-month ahead metric rise to 3.1% from 2.9%. In terms of market gauges, the EZ 5y5y inflation forward has ticked higher to 2.06% vs. circa 2.03% at the time of the prior meeting. On the growth front, Q1 GDP is currently estimated at 0.3% Q/Q vs. the Q4 print of 0.2%. More timely survey data from S&P Global showed manufacturing PMI for May climbed to 49.4 from 49.0, services slipped to 48.9 from 50.1, leaving the composite at 49.5 vs. prev. 50.4. The accompanying release noted “the eurozone economy just cannot seem to find its footing”. The unemployment rate remains at the historic low of 6.2%.

    RECENT COMMUNICATIONS: Since the prior meeting, President Lagarde has remarked that levies are probably more disinflationary than inflationary. However, the net effect of tariffs is still uncertain. Chief Economist Lane is confident that the Bankʼs task to bring inflation back to 2% is “mostly completed”, however, services inflation is "still too high". The influential Schnabel of Germany is of the view that tariffs could be disinflationary in the short run but result in upside risk over the medium term. France's Villeroy has stated that interest rate normalisation within the EZ is probably incomplete. Typically-dovish, Panetta of Italy has remarked that there is reduced room to cut rates further, though the macro outlook is weak and trade tensions could weigh on this. Elsewhere, Cyprus' Patsalides has noted that a 50bp cut would only be justified if recession risks intensified with stronger disinflation. At the hawkish end of the spectrum, Austriaʼs Holzmann thinks the Bank should not lower rates in June or July.

    RATES: Consensus looks for the ECB to cut rates by 25bps with markets assigning a 95% chance of such an outcome. Since the prior meeting, whilst there has been an easing of tensions between the US and China, which led to an improvement in the global trade outlook, a deal between the EU and the US remains elusive. The lack of progress prompted US President Trump to recommend a 50% tariff on the EU as of June 1st. This threat has since been pushed back to July 9th and the EU is increasing efforts to get an agreement. However, large gaps between the two sides remain and the growth outlook remains uncertain. Furthermore, as detailed above, progress on the inflation front means that policymakers have the green light to ease policy (also aided by the stronger EUR and declining oil prices). Assuming the ECB cuts by 25bps this week, the focus will be on any clues as to what comes thereafter, given the apparent split of views on the GC. The accounts of the ECB meeting (albeit when trade tensions were higher) showed that some members would have been comfortable with a 50bps reduction. Some of the more hawkish members on the GC may opt to dissent to the decision with Holzmann of the view that the ECB should not cut rates in June or July. Currently, markets see a total of 54bps of loosening by year-end (including the expected June cut).

    MACRO PROJECTIONS: For the accompanying macro projections, Rabobank expects growth to be revised down a touch for both 2025 and 2026 while the inflation view is likely to be trimmed for 2025 to 2.0% (Mar. 2.3%) but increased for 2026 to 2.3% (Mar. 2.0%).

    HICP INFLATION:

    • 2025: 2.3%
    • 2026: 1.9%
    • 2027: 2.0%

    HICP CORE INFLATION (EX-ENERGY & FOOD):

    • 2025: 2.2%
    • 2026: 2.0%
    • 2027: 1.9%

    GDP:

    • 2025: 0.9%
    • 2026: 1.2%
    • 2027: 1.3%
    Tyler Durden Thu, 06/05/2025 - 08:35
  23. Site: Rorate Caeli
    3 days 19 hours ago
     by Caminante WandererArgentina, June 5, 2025Almost a month has passed since the beginning of thge pontificate of Leo XIV. In this blog we said that we would be waiting for the first one hundred days, and there is still more than half of it to go. However, that does not prevent us from gradually getting an idea of his character, based on his words and first decisions.I have the impression, New Catholichttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04118576661605931910noreply@blogger.com
  24. Site: Zero Hedge
    3 days 19 hours ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    US Equity Futures Unchanged Ahead Of ECB As Jobs Data Looms

    US equity futures are unchanged, as they struggle for direction ahead of Friday’s payrolls report, following a series of data releases that offered mixed signals on the health of the economy.  As of 8:00am, S&P futures are flat, having traded on either side of the unchanged line during the overnight session and followed a slurry of weak macro data releases which saw Wednesday's gains erase and recover, with the S&P ultimately ending the day flat. Nasdaq 100 futs are down 0.1% with Mag 7 stocks mostly higher except for TSLA (-1.6%). Stocks and bonds in Europe gained ahead of the ECB's expected 8th consecutive interest rate cut. The yield on 10-year US Treasuries steadied as Wednesday’s bond rally faded. The dollar reversed earlier losses even as gold surged to briefly top $3400. Commodities are mostly mixed with notable outperformance in silver (+3.1%). News flow since yesterday’s close has been largely muted: headlines continue to focus on trade negotiation development, particularly implication on rare earth curbs (BBG and CNBC) and upcoming Trump-Xi call.

    In premarket trading, the Mag 7 stocks are mixed (Alphabet +1.3%, Amazon +0.7%, Meta +0.2%, Microsoft 0%, Tesla -2.6%, Nvidia -0.5%, Apple -0.3%). Broadcom shares rise 1% in premarket ahead of earnings due after the bell. Chewy shares (CHWY) are down 2.4% premarket after Jefferies analyst Kaumil Gajrawala cut the recommendation on the online retailer of pet products to hold from buy, writing that valuation appears “primed” for a first-quarter beat and raise that’s unlikely to happen. Dollar Tree Inc. shares (DLTR) are up 1.6% in premarket trading, after JPMorgan upgraded the discount retailer to overweight from neutral. Here are some other notable movers: 

    • Five Below (FIVE) gains 6% in premarket trading after the discount stores company reported first-quarter results that beat expectations and guided for net sales in the second quarter that are above estimates.
    • Nebius shares (NBIS) gain 5.6% in US premarket trading after the AI infrastructure software provider is initiated with a buy rating at Arete Research, while peer CoreWeave declines 2% after getting new neutral rating.
    • PVH shares (PVH) drop 7.9% in premarket trading after the Calvin Klein owner cut its full-year adjusted earnings guidance, and noted that the outlook reflects an estimated net negative impact in relation to tariffs placed on goods coming into the US.
    • Planet Labs shares (PL) jump 20% in premarket trading after first-quarter revenue beat estimates. Analysts at Citizens said the satellite data provider had a “stellar quarter” and the stock remains an opportunity for long-term capital appreciation.
    • Visa shares (V) rise 1% in premarket trading on Thursday as Mizuho Securities raises the stock to outperform from neutral, saying the cash-to-card runway in the US still has room to grow.

    The wild swings in stocks that were sparked by the Trump administration’s tariff announcements in April — and subsequent rebound — have given way to more subdued daily moves in recent weeks. The US benchmark has remained largely flat since mid-May as traders assess the impact of the trade war on economic activity.

    Friday’s jobs report is expected to show that growth in nonfarm payrolls slowed and the unemployment rate remained steady. While the figures would chime with Wednesday data that showed a contraction in US services and a deceleration in private hiring, separate data earlier in the week unexpectedly showed a fairly broad advance in US job openings.

    “Consensus is for lower job creation,” said Ulrich Urbahn, head of multi-asset strategy and research at Berenberg. “I think there must be a big surprise to the downside for volatility to increase.”

    Some investors are warning that the current period of relative market calm could once again give way to volatility, as uncertainty lingers over the outcome of trade negotiations between the US and its biggest trading partners — and the full economic impact remains unclear.

    “Our bias remains to sell any rallies” in US bonds, said Mohit Kumar, chief European strategist at Jefferies International. “We are concerned over the fiscal deficits and the willingness of the rest of the world to continue financing US fiscal deficits.”

    The European Central Bank is set to cut rates for an eighth time later on Thursday. Another reduction is expected in September, when trade talks with the US should have concluded and fresh forecasts will reveal the full implications of the tariffs. And speaking of Europe, the Stoxx 600 is up 0.4%, rising for a third day ahead of a widely anticipated interest-rate cut by the European Central Bank. European stocks were on track for the highest close in more than two weeks. Technology, construction and health care stocks are leading gains while travel and retail provide a drag. Here are the biggest European movers:

    • Bayer shares rise as much as 5.1% after Goldman Sachs upgrades the German chemicals and pharmaceutical company to buy from neutral, saying it sees earnings as having bottomed out and thinks risks around litigation and pharma data are overdone.
    • Dr. Martens surges as much as 17%, the most since November, after the UK bootmaker releases its full-year results and outlines its new ‘Levers For Growth’ strategy update.
    • Redcare shares rise as much as 2.3%, paring some of Wednesday’s 14% drop that was spurred by a rating downgrade at Kepler Cheuvreux. Concerns about structural challenges related to the anticipated phaseout of the CardLink system are “unwarranted and lack concrete support,” according to Deutsche Bank analysts.
    • Wise shares rise as much as 9% to a record high after the money-transfer firm said it intends to seek a primary listing in the US to enhance visibility to the investment community and the stock’s trading.
    • Burckhardt shares gain as much as 6%, to the highest level since February, with Vontobel analysts saying the Swiss compressors manufacturer delivered significant margin progress compared to last year, driven by a good product mix.
    • Wizz Air shares fall as much as 27%, the steepest drop since the early days of the pandemic, after the airline’s cost guidance and fourth-quarter results disappointed analysts.
    • CMC Markets shares tank as much as 18% after reporting annual pretax profit below expectations after disappointing investors on costs, according to analysts at Shore Capital, while the dividend was also lower than hoped.
    • Akzo Nobel falls as much as 2.5% as UBS cuts the recommendation on the coatings and Dulux paint maker to neutral from buy.
    • Avolta shares drop as much as 7.9% after one of its investors sold shares at a discount to Wednesday’s close.
    • Hemnet falls as much as 8.4% to its lowest since Jan. 31 after Nordea double-downgraded its view on the Swedish real estate listings platform to sell from buy, saying recent monetization pushes for premium offerings “may have crossed a line where user price elasticity begins to invite disruption.”

    Earlier in the session, Asian stocks edged higher, as South Korean shares extended a rally on hopes of improved corporate governance under the new president. The MSCI Asia Pacific Index rose as much as 0.4%, heading for its highest level in more than three years. Korea’s Kospi Index jumped 1.5% after the ruling party said it will propose a revision to Commercial Act again, a key step in improving corporate governance. Benchmarks in Hong Kong and Taiwan also gained, with US economic data starting to soften and supporting the case for an interest-rate cut by the Federal Reserve. Japanese shares fell. Demand at the country’s 30-year bond auction was weaker than the average over the past year. The regional benchmark’s gain in recent weeks is in tandem with global peers, which closed at a record high Wednesday on expectations that the worst of higher tariffs may be over. Still, uncertainty remains high around the progress of US-China trade talks, with Chinese leader Xi Jinping making clear that a phone call doesn’t come without a price. That’s even as Trump is seeking a personal discussion with Beijing to prevent further escalation in trade tensions.

    In FX, the Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index is unchanged. The Japanese yen is the weakest of the G-10 currencies, falling 0.3% against the greenback. The kiwi tops the leader board with a 0.4% gain. The euro traded steady after advancing more than 10% against the dollar year-to-date.

    In rates, treasuries are mixed with gains only seen at the longer end of the curve. US 30-year yields fall 2 bps to 4.86%. European government bonds advance across all maturities, with UK and German 10-year yields falling 3-4 bps each. Japanese government bonds rose after an auction of 30-year debt was better than many investors had feared. Still, a bid-to-cover ratio of 2.92 at the offering pointed to a general lack of appetite for longer-maturity debt.
    Markets

    In commodities, oil prices are steady with WTI near $63 a barrel. Spot gold rises $12 to around $3,385/oz. Silver rises 3% and above $35/oz for the time since 2012.

    Looking to the day ahead, and the main highlight will be the ECB’s latest policy decision and President Lagarde’s subsequent press conference. Otherwise, we’ll hear from the Fed’s Kugler, Harker and Schmid, BoE Deputy Governor Breeden, and the BoE’s Greene. Data releases from the UK include the weekly initial jobless claims and the April trade balance. Meanwhile in Europe, there’s German factory orders for April, and the May construction PMIs for Germany and the UK.

    Market Snapshot

    • S&P 500 mini little changed
    • Nasdaq 100 mini little changed
    • Russell 2000 mini +0.1%
    • Stoxx Europe 600 +0.4%
    • DAX +0.4%
    • CAC 40 +0.4%
    • 10-year Treasury yield -1 basis point at 4.35%
    • VIX little changed at 17.58
    • Bloomberg Dollar Index little changed at 1208.49
    • euro little changed at $1.142
    • WTI crude +0.1% at $62.94/barrel

    Top Overnight News

    • White House official said Elon Musk's opposition is one disagreement in an otherwise harmonious relationship and it will not consult every policy decision with Elon Musk, while the official added that President Trump is committed to getting the bill passed, despite opposition from Musk.
    • The ECB looks all but certain to cut rates by 25 bps to 2% today. Another reduction is expected in September, but constantly changing US trade threats will cloud new economic projections and President Christine Lagarde’s press conference. BBG
    • Donald Trump and Republican senators discussed ways to scale back the $40,000 state and local tax deduction cap in the House version of the president’s tax-cut bill, Senate Majority Leader John Thune said. BBG
    • Treasuries edged higher as traders got a boost from Japan, where government bonds rose after a 30-year auction was better than feared. BBG
    • "There’s no resolution yet on SALT, which Senate Republicans want to change significantly. We’re told Trump didn’t object when GOP senators reiterated their desire to water down the House’s USD 40,000 deduction cap.": Punchbowl
    • Senate Republicans on Wednesday discussed the need to cut out waste, fraud and abuse in Medicare to achieve more deficit reduction in President Trump’s landmark bill to extend the 2017 tax cuts, provide new tax relief, secure the border and boost defense spending. The Hill
    • US Senate Majority Leader Thune said Senate Republicans had a positive budget bill talk with President Trump and feel good about where they are on the Trump tax bill, while GOP Senator Crapo said Republicans have very strong support and unity on the Trump tax bill.
    • OMB chief Vought said the White House doesn't support the debt ceiling being removed from the reconciliation bill and that the Trump spending bill will improve the deficit, while he added they are having very good conversations with the Senate on the Trump spending bill and opposing views from outside aren't hurting bill's prospects.
    • Trump signed a proclamation to ban travel from certain countries whereby the proclamation fully restricts and limits the entry of nationals from 12 countries, including Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen, while Trump said travel ban list is subject to revision and new countries could be added as threats emerge around the world. Furthermore, President Trump signed a proclamation to restrict foreign student visas at Harvard University.
    • Wall Street’s top regulator took a step toward toughening rules for foreign companies listed on American stock markets on Wednesday, saying many Chinese firms in particular unduly benefited from having to make fewer regular disclosures to investors. The regulator warned that foreign firms, especially ones from China, could face stricter disclosure rules. SCMP
    • US business optimism moved sharply lower, with only 27% of executives polled in May by the AICPA confident about the economic outlook for the 12 months ahead. BBG
    • A private gauge of China’s services sector signaled that activity picked up in May, despite a renewed fall in new export orders. The Caixin services purchasing managers index rose to 51.1 last month from 50.7 in April, Caixin Media and S&P Global said Thursday. That marked the 29th month above the 50-mark separating expansion from contraction. WSJ
    • China warned major EV makers including BYD, Geely and Xiaomi to stop unsustainable price wars, people familiar said. Officials urged self-regulation but gave no formal orders. They also raised concerns over unpaid supplier bills. BBG
    • German factory orders unexpectedly kept rising in April after Trump’s announcement of US reciprocal tariffs, defying expectations for a setback. BBG

    Tariffs/Trade

    • US President Trump is to meet with German Chancellor Merz at 11:45EDT/16:45BST today.
    • US auto supplier group said immediate and decisive action is needed to prevent widespread disruption and economic fallout across the vehicle supplier sector on the Chinese rare earth issue.
    • Vietnam sent a document with replies to US requests on trade and the Trade Minister met with USTR Greer to discuss the main points in Vietnam's replies to the US's requests on trade.
    • Chinese Foreign Ministry says there is no information to share on a US President Trump/Chinese President Xi call, via Bloomberg.
    • EU Trade Commissioner Sefcovic says China's "impressive" rise must not come at the expense of the European economy "Our objective is straightforward, to identify real and highest vulnerability across political areas. I am talking about advanced semiconductors, AI and quantum tech".
    • EU Businesses are lobbying Beijing to set up a "special channel" to fast track Chinese approval of rare earth export licenses for "reliable" companies, according to FT sources; proposal was made at a meeting with European companies and MOFCOM officials.

    A more detailed look at global markets courtesy of Newsquawk

    APAC stocks were mixed after the choppy performance in US where markets digested disappointing data and a drop in yields. ASX 200 struggled for direction following mixed data including the latest trade figures and household spending for Australia. Nikkei 225 retreated amid headwinds from recent currency strength and following softer-than-expected Labour Earnings. Hang Seng and Shanghai Comp were somewhat varied as tech and property names led the outperformance in Hong Kong, while the mainland was contained following mixed Caixin PMI data and as participants wait and see if a Trump-Xi call will materialise this week.

    Top Asian News

    • China's Commerce Minister met with the OECD Secretary General at the WTO meeting in France and said China is willing to share experience with the OECD in trade and investment, digital economy and green developments. China is willing to carry out personnel exchanges and promote practical cooperation with the OECD and hopes that the OECD will firmly stand on the side of international fairness and justice.
    • China warns BYD and rivals to self regulate as the price war heats up, according to Bloomberg.

    European bourses (STOXX 600 +0.4%) opened on either side of the unchanged mark, but soon after the cash open, indices caught a bid to depict a mostly positive environment. Nothing behind the move higher, but it occurred alongside a pick-up in US equity futures. Indices are currently trading at highs. Focus now turns to the ECB, where a  25bps cut is widely expected. European sectors are mixed, with the breadth of the market fairly narrow today. Construction takes the top spot, joined closely by Tech and then Healthcare. Travel & Leisure sits at the foot of the pile, with the downside stemming from very poor FY results from Wizz Air (-22%).

    Top European News

    • UK is to unveil pension reform aimed at boosting retirement savings with the parliamentary bill to be presented on Thursday set to include a reserve power that could force schemes to invest more in Britain, according to FT
    • Times Political Editor Swinford posts UK Chancellor Reeves will next week set out plans to restore winter fuel payments and then claw them back from millions of better-off pensioners through higher tax bills.
    • BoE Monthly Decision Maker Panel data - May 2025: Expectations for year-ahead CPI inflation remained unchanged at 3.2% in the three months to May. Expectations for three year-ahead CPI inflation remained unchanged at 2.8% in the three months to May. Expected year-ahead wage growth fell by 0.1 percentage points to 3.7% on a three-month moving-average basis in May. Across all questions on sales, prices and investment over 70% of firms reported that changes to US trade policy would have no material impact on their firms. US trade policy was reported to be one of the top three sources of uncertainty for 12% of businesses, significantly lower than the 22% who reported it to be a top-three source of uncertainty in April.

    FX

    • DXY is a touch higher with the USD showing a mixed performance vs. peers (weaker vs. antipodeans, firmer vs. havens). This follows a session of losses on Wednesday which were triggered by soft outturns for US ADP and ISM services PMIs. Newsflow since has been on the quiet side, aside from President Trump calling for a scrapping of the debt limit; something that appears to be very unlikely to be implemented. As such, focus will remain on the labour market for now (pending any major trade updates) with weekly claims, Challenger Layoffs due on today's docket, with Fed speak also due. DXY currently in a 99.68-94 range.
    • EUR flat vs. the USD as markets await the latest ECB policy announcement which is widely expected to see the GC deliver a 25bps cut in the Deposit Rate to 2.0%. With the decision itself nailed on, focus will be on any hints over future easing plans. Lagarde is unlikely to offer any explicit guidance on this front given the uncertainties presented by the trade war. EUR/USD briefly matched Wednesday's best at 1.1435 before ebbing lower as a beat on German Industrial Output failed to support the currency.
    • JPY softer vs. the USD and at the bottom of the G10 leaderboard alongside the other notable haven, CHF. Losses were spurred alongside a pick-up in risk sentiment in early European trade as the pair attempted to atone for Wednesday's USD-led losses. 143.39 is the high water mark thus far which is a point below Wednesday's best.
    • GBP is a touch firmer vs. the USD with UK-specific newsflow remaining on the light side as has been the case throughout the week. From a fiscal standpoint, Times Political Editor Swinford posts UK Chancellor Reeves will next week set out plans to restore winter fuel payments and then claw them back from millions of better-off pensioners through higher tax bills. Cable is yet to test Wednesday's best at 1.3580. If breached, the YTD peak from 26th May at 1.3593.
    • Antipodeans are holding onto recent spoils with both currencies underpinned by a pick up in sentiment in early European trade. AUD digested mixed Australian data overnight including the latest trade figures and household spending.

    Fixed Income

    • JGBs were contained through much of the APAC session before selling off on the 30yr JGB auction. A sale that featured a softer cover than the prior and a wider price tail, pushing JGBs lower by around 20 ticks to a 139.01 base. Then move did mostly pare given the outing was not as bad-as-feared.
    • USTs are higher by a handful of ticks and within a 110-12 to 111-07 parameters. Specifics light in the European morning and no catalyst behind it but US equity futures, and European peers, saw a jump just after the European cash equity open. This weighed on USTs slightly to a 111-00+ base. From a US standpoint, Fed speak, Jobless Claims and Challenger Layoffs are all due.
    • Bunds are on a stronger footing, a small bout of pressure following German Industrial Orders, which was a little better than expected. Pressure which then accelerated around the cash open when stocks caught a bid but this was short lived. Thereafter, a strong set of auctions from both France and Spain has, alongside a pullback in the risk tone, fuelled the upside. Currently trading at the upper end of a 130.79 to 131.35 parameter, going into the ECB where the Bank is expected to deliver a 25bps cut.
    • Gilts are heading into the resumption of trade, the bias for Gilts was for a contained to slightly softer open. As the benchmark closed towards highs on Wednesday and while USTs were contained Bunds had come off slightly after Industrial Orders. However, an announcement from the ONS that the most recent inflation headline was being revised lower by 0.1pps offset this and provided modest bullish impetus for Gilts, causing them to open higher by eight ticks and then extend a few more.
    • Spain sells EUR 5.5bln vs exp. EUR 4.5-5.5bln 2.40% 2028, 2.70% 2030 & 0.70% 2032 & EUR 0.563bln vs exp. EUR 0.25-0.75bln 2.05% 2039 I/L.
    • France sells EUR 12bln vs exp. EUR 10-12bln 3.20% 2035, 1.25% 2036 & 3.75% 2056 OAT.
    • Japan sells JPY 604.8bln 30-yr JGBs; b/c 2.92x (prev. 3.07x), and average yield 2.904% (prev. 2.941%). Lowest accepted price 91.45 vs prev. 91.10; Average accepted price 91.94 vs prev. 91.40; Tail in price 0.49 vs prev. 0.30.

    Commodities

    • Crude is slightly firmer and trading attempting to claw back Wednesday’s hefty energy specific losses, most notably the Bloomberg reports that Saudi Arabia wants more super size OPEC+ cuts. WTI and Brent reside within narrow USD 62.50-63.15 and 64.60-65.25/bbl bounds.
    • Spot gold is trading on a firmer footing but underperforming vs spot silver, which has caught a bid in recent trade. Nothing fundamental for the recent surge in silver prices, instead the move appears to be more of a technical breakout with perhaps some impetus coming from the risk tone easing from initial highs in recent trade. XAU/USD currently trades towards the upper end of a USD 3,361.27-3,390/oz parameter; Spot silver outperforms, just off a USD 35.80 peak.
    • Copper looks to build on the prior session’s gains, despite mixed Caixin PMIs, which showed the composite slip into contractionary territory, and services remain afloat, ticking up moderately. 3M LME Copper trades in a USD 9,622.65-9,692.2/t range.
    • Peru's government restored formal mining operations in violence-affected areas in northern Peru.

    Geopolitics

    • US President Trump has told people he met with in recent days that the Ukraine drone attack likely would push Russian President Putin to retaliate very significantly, according to Axios sources.
    • US President Trump said he spoke with Russian President Putin in which the conversation lasted 15 minutes and they discussed Ukraine’s attack on Russia’s docked aeroplanes, as well as various other attacks that have been taking place by both sides. Trump added it was a good conversation, but not a conversation that will lead to immediate peace, while Trump noted that Putin said very strongly, that he will have to respond to the recent attack on the airfields.
    • US is redirecting critical anti-drone technology from Ukraine to US forces in a move that reflects the Pentagon's waning commitment to Kyiv's defence, according to WSJ.
    • Ukrainian drone attacks hit energy targets in Russian-held areas of Zaporizhzhia and the Kherson region, with tens of thousands without power, according to Russian-installed officials.
    • Ukraine's Economy Minister said the first meeting of the Ukraine minerals fund is expected in July and Ukraine has discussed with the US about how to make the minerals fund operational by year-end.
    • China's Guangzhou Public Security Bureau issued a bounty for cyber attack suspects that it said are linked to the Taiwan authorities.

    US Event Calendar

    • 7:30 am: May Challenger Job Cuts YoY, prior 62.7%
    • 8:30 am: Apr Trade Balance, est. -66b, prior -140.5b
    • 8:30 am: 1Q F Nonfarm Productivity, est. -0.8%, prior -0.8%
    • 8:30 am: 1Q F Unit Labor Costs, est. 5.7%, prior 5.7%
    • 8:30 am: May 31 Initial Jobless Claims, est. 235k, prior 240k
    • 8:30 am: May 24 Continuing Claims, est. 1910k, prior 1919k

    Central Banks:

    • 12:00 pm: Fed’s Kugler Speaks on Economic Outlook, Policy
    • 1:30 pm: Fed’s Harker Speaks on Economic Outlook
    • 1:30 pm: Fed’s Schmid Speaks on Banking Policy

    DB's Jim Reid concludes the overnight wrap

    Markets put in a strong performance yesterday, after a weak batch of US data led to a massive rally for US Treasuries, which in turn supported risk assets. So investors became a lot more confident that the Fed would still cut rates this year, and the 10yr Treasury yield fell -10.0bps on the day to 4.36%. That decline in yields had the double benefit of easing financial conditions, whilst also relaxing fears about the fiscal situation. So equities held up despite the underwhelming data, with the S&P 500 (+0.01%) narrowly reaching a 3-month high. Indeed, the index is now up +19.83% since its closing low after Liberation Day, leaving it just shy of the 20% mark that would mark the technical start of a bull market.
    Of course, even with the rally, the data still raised fears that the US economy lost steam into May. That started off with the ADP’s report of private payrolls, which was the softest in over two years, at just +37k (vs. +114k expected). And shortly after that, we had the ISM services index, which fell to 49.9 (vs. 52.0 expected), and the details from the report weren’t great either. For instance, the new orders component slumped to a two-year low of 46.4, whilst the prices paid indicator surged to 68.7, the highest since 2022. 

    Nevertheless, investors weren’t too alarmed by these data prints, as the numbers weren’t so bad as to revive fears about a recession. Indeed, it’s worth noting that the ISM services index had a big move lower back in December 2022, at a time when the Fed were aggressively hiking rates, which was then followed up by a strong recovery the following month. So in general, investors were reluctant to over-interpret one day’s data, not least given the big test is coming tomorrow with the US jobs report. Moreover, there was a more positive signal from the final US composite PMI for May, which was revised up from the flash reading to 53.0. 

    In terms of the market reaction, both the ADP and the ISM services prints led investors to price in more rate cuts this year, with clear moves in response to the two prints. In fact by the close, futures were pricing in 58bps of rate cuts by the Fed’s December meeting, up +8.0bps on the day, and the highest number in over three weeks. And there’s growing confidence that we’ll see the first rate cut by September, with futures now almost fully pricing (97%) one by that meeting. Given the additional rate cuts being priced, that triggered a major surge for US Treasuries yesterday. So at the front end, the 2yr yield was down -8.5bps on the day to 3.87%. And for the 30yr yield, the -10.3bps move was actually the biggest daily decline since February, pushing the yield down to 4.88%. Only a small amount of that rally has unwound this morning, with the 10yr yield up +0.6bps, and the 30yr yield up +0.5bps.

    The large slide in Treasury yields had the added benefit of reassuring investors about the fiscal situation, which had been in growing focus as the 30yr yield hovered around the 5% mark. So even with the weak economic data, risk assets held up reasonably well with the S&P 500 (+0.01%) narrowly posting a 3-month high in a session that saw the lowest daily trading range for the index since mid-February. The S&P 500 now stands just -2.82% beneath its all-time high in February, although futures this morning aren’t suggesting much momentum, with those on the S&P 500 down -0.05%.
    Meanwhile in Europe, there were consistent gains, with the STOXX 600 (+0.47%) advancing for a second day. There was some support from the final PMI numbers, with the Euro Area composite revised up from the flash reading to 50.2 (vs. flash 49.5). So that meant it was no longer beneath the 50-mark pointing towards a contraction. Over in Germany, the DAX (+0.77%) even hit a fresh record, which came as the cabinet approved a new package of corporate tax breaks. For sovereign bonds, there was a steadier performance across the continent, with yields on 10yr bunds (+0.1bps), OATs (+1.3bps) and BTPs (-0.3bps) seeing modest movements. 

    Yesterday also brought headlines in the geopolitical sphere, although markets weren’t too reactive to the various stories. Before the European open, President Trump said that President Xi was “VERY TOUGH, AND EXTREMELY HARD TO MAKE A DEAL WITH!!!” So that led to a very modest slide in US equity futures. Meanwhile, Trump also posted about a conversation with Russian President Putin, which he said was “not a conversation that will lead to immediate Peace.” Otherwise on the trade front, there were positive noises from the US-EU trade negotiations. EU trade commissioner Maroš Šefčovič tweeted that “We’re advancing in the right direction at pace – and staying in close contact to maintain the momentum.” Similarly, US trade representative Jamieson Greer said that “I am pleased that negotiations are advancing quickly”. 

    Overnight in Asia we’ve seen a pretty mixed performance from the major equity indices. In Japan, the Nikkei is down -0.46%, which follows a weak auction of 30yr debt, where there was the weakest demand since 2023. However, bond markets haven’t reacted badly, with the 30yr yield coming down -6.6bps this morning. By contrast, South Korea’s KOSPI (+1.05%) has built on yesterday’s +2.66% gain, with the index currently on track to close at its highest level since mid-July. Otherwise, the Hang Seng (+0.42%) is on track for a third consecutive advance, whilst the CSI 300 (+0.07%) and the Shanghai Comp (+0.08%) have also posted modest gains this morning. 

    Looking forward, central banks will be in the spotlight today, as the ECB are announcing their latest policy decision at 13:15 London time. It’s widely expected that they’ll deliver another 25bp rate cut, taking their deposit rate down to 2%. However, after a succession of consecutive cuts, there’s more doubt on what happens after this meeting into year-end, as this cut would take them broadly into the middle of the neutral range. In their preview (link here), our European economists expect the ECB to keep the meeting-by-meeting, data-dependent approach to setting policy. However, they think getting the hawks to support a June cut might require a hint of conditional patience, including an implicit willingness to pause at the next meeting in July and wait until September. 

    Staying on central banks, the Bank of Canada left their policy rate on hold at 2.75% yesterday, in line with expectations. Afterwards, Governor Macklem said “there was a clear consensus to hold policy unchanged as we gain more information”. And in future, he said “members thought there could be a need for a reduction in the policy rate if the economy weakens in the face of continued US tariffs and uncertainty, and cost pressures on inflation are contained.” By the close, the Canadian dollar had strengthened +0.31% against the US Dollar to its strongest level since early October. However, that was mainly a function of US dollar weakness, with the US Dollar weakening against every other G10 currency yesterday after the weaker US data.

    To the day ahead, and the main highlight will be the ECB’s latest policy decision and President Lagarde’s subsequent press conference. Otherwise, we’ll hear from the Fed’s Kugler, Harker and Schmid, BoE Deputy Governor Breeden, and the BoE’s Greene. Data releases from the UK include the weekly initial jobless claims and the April trade balance. Meanwhile in Europe, there’s German factory orders for April, and the May construction PMIs for Germany and the UK.

    Tyler Durden Thu, 06/05/2025 - 08:15
  25. Site: Saint Louis Catholic
    3 days 19 hours ago
    Author: thetimman

    About 400 yards away. Zip—right on by.

    Not to be dramatic, it wasn’t a strong tornado like the one that devastated the city a a couple of weeks ago. Little damage.

    But still, I have to get my house in order. God gives us so many reminders of the real.

  26. Site: AsiaNews.it
    3 days 19 hours ago
    Several civil society groups have presented an appeal to the Ministry of Justice after it announced new legislation. They want the government to immediately and unconditionally scrap the existing law. But for Justice Minister Nanayakkara, it is 'essential'. Adopted in 1982, the PTA has been used to silence critical voices and oppress minorities, such as Tamils ​​and Muslims. ...
  27. Site: Mises Institute
    3 days 20 hours ago
    Author: Brae F. Sadler
    Accreditation in higher education began as a private effort to identify academic quality. Then the federal government took over the process and demanded that accreditation be based upon political standards.
  28. Site: Novus Motus Liturgicus
    3 days 20 hours ago
    From the homily of Pope St Gregory the Great read on the octave of the Ascension in the Roman Breviary. Concerning the glory of (Christ’s) Ascension, Habakkuk also said, “The sun was lifted up, and the moon stood still in her rank.” (3, 10-11) Who is here signified by the name of the Sun, if not the Lord, and by the name of the Moon, if not the Church? For until the Lord ascended to the heavens, Gregory DiPippohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13295638279418781125noreply@blogger.com0
  29. Site: AsiaNews.it
    3 days 21 hours ago
    A particularly brutal case of rape ending in the death of the victim raises serious questions about the conditions of disadvantaged groups. Ambedkar's grandson: 'The big parties say nothing because she did not belong to a higher caste.' Sr. Dorothy Fernandes to AsiaNews: 'The increase in gang rape is a sign of a sick society.'
  30. Site: AsiaNews.it
    3 days 21 hours ago
    Police forces are forcing worshippers to sign (illegal) statements pledging not to perform rituals, even in private homes. Local sources report people being detained or abused. Recently, a respected doctor, Sheikh Mahmood, was killed in Sargodha because he was Ahmadi. Activist groups and NGOs appeal to the government to protect religious rights and freedoms.
  31. Site: Zero Hedge
    3 days 21 hours ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    British Blasphemy Prosecution: London Man Convicted After Burning Qur'an

    Authored by Jonathan Turley,

    We recently discussed how the United Kingdom has continued its erosion of free speech by pushing an effective blasphemy law. Now, a London man has been convicted of a “religiously aggravated public order offence.” Hamit Coskun, 50, a Turkish-born Armenian-Kurdish atheist was arrested after burning a Qur’an.

    Coskun was protesting the government of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan in Ankara over his embrace of radical Islamic principles. Exclaiming “f**k Islam” and “Islam is religion of terrorism,” he burned the Qur’an and was then slashed by a Muslim man with a knife. Critics were outraged that the man (who later pleaded guilty) was released while police continued to hold Coskun.

    Despite arguing that his protest was protected speech, District Judge John McGarva convicted him and declared that his actions were “highly provocative” and that they were “motivated at least in part by a hatred of Muslims.” Judge McGarva made clear that his views of Islam would not be tolerated in the United Kingdom:

    “After considering the evidence, I find you have a deep-seated hatred of Islam and its followers. That’s based on your experiences in Turkey and the experiences of your family. It’s not possible to separate your views about the religion to your views about the followers.

    I do accept that the choice of location was in part that you wanted to protest what you see as the Islamification of Turkey. But you were also motivated by the hatred of Muslims and knew some would be at the location.”

    Coskun later correctly condemned the decision as “an assault on free speech” and added:

    “Christian blasphemy laws were repealed in this country more than 15 years ago, and it cannot be right to prosecute someone for blaspheming against Islam. Would I have been prosecuted if I’d set fire to a copy of the bible outside Westminster Abbey? I doubt it.”

    For years, I have been writing about the decline of free speech in the United Kingdom and the steady stream of arrests, including in my book, The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage.

    A man was convicted for sending a tweet while drunk referring to dead soldiers. Another was arrested for an anti-police t-shirt. Another was arrested for calling the Irish boyfriend of his ex-girlfriend a “leprechaun.” Yet another was arrested for singing “Kung Fu Fighting.” A teenager was arrested for protesting outside of a Scientology center with a sign calling the religion a “cult.”

    Nicholas Brock, 52, was convicted of a thought crime in Maidenhead, Berkshire. The neo-Nazi was given a four-year sentence for what the court called his “toxic ideology” based on the contents of the home he shared with his mother in Maidenhead, Berkshire. Judge Peter Lodder QC dismissed free speech or free thought concerns with a truly Orwellian statement:

    “I do not sentence you for your political views, but the extremity of those views informs the assessment of dangerousness.”

    Lodder lambasted Brock for holding Nazi and other hateful values:

    “[i]t is clear that you are a right-wing extremist, your enthusiasm for this repulsive and toxic ideology is demonstrated by the graphic and racist iconography which you have studied and appeared to share with others…”

    The fear is that an expanded hate speech law that includes criticism of Islamophobia will operate like a British blasphemy law. In 2008, the common law offences of blasphemy and blasphemous libel were abolished in England. This new effort could constructively restore such prosecutions as they relate to Islam.

    Tyler Durden Thu, 06/05/2025 - 06:30
  32. Site: AsiaNews.it
    3 days 21 hours ago
    At a meeting on relations between Central Asia and China, the Astana government praised the rapprochement between the 'two lungs of Asia', which is advancing in step with the internal transformations initiated by Tokaev. Despite protests from some opponents and activists, the president wants to project an image of 'inclusive democracy' by leaving the limelight to some of his collaborators.
  33. Site: AsiaNews.it
    3 days 21 hours ago
    Today's news: the US rejects the UN Security Council resolution on Gaza;First phone call between Pope Leo XIV and Russian President Vladimir Putin;Trump signs ban on entry from 12 countries, including Afghanistan, Myanmar, Iran and Yemen;Umar Patek, one of the 2002 Bali bombers, opens a café and intends to use the proceeds to compensate the victims;Phnom Penh and Bangkok to meet on 14 June to discuss borders.
  34. Site: Mises Institute
    3 days 21 hours ago
    Author: Ryan McMaken, Jonathan Newman
    Jonathan Newman joins Ryan McMaken to talk about the history behind the myth of "Fed independence." The Fed has never been politically independent of the US government, and it has enthusiastically helped fund the US government both in wartime and in peacetime.
  35. Site: OnePeterFive
    3 days 21 hours ago
    Author: St. Augustine

    From the Roman office. ℣. Grant, Lord, a blessing. Benediction. May God the Father Omnipotent, be to us merciful and clement. ℟. Amen. Reading 4 From the Sermons of St. Augustine, Bishop of Hippo. 3rd on the Ascension, 176th on the Season. Dearly beloved brethren, all the wonderful works which our Lord Jesus Christ did in this world, under the weakness of our nature…

    Source

  36. Site: Catholic Conclave
    3 days 21 hours ago
    Chartres Pilgrimage: "Between the Church and the traditionalists, when will there be a de-escalation?"It would be a horrible irony if the New Mass had an afterlife in the revival empowered by the Latin MassRome's demands regarding the Chartres pilgrimage organized this Pentecost weekend, from June 7 to 9 by Our Lady of Christendom, are fueling a controversy. For Father Pierre Amar, a priest Catholic Conclavehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06227218883606585321noreply@blogger.com0
  37. Site: LES FEMMES - THE TRUTH
    3 days 22 hours ago
    Author: noreply@blogger.com (Mary Ann Kreitzer)
  38. Site: Catholic Conclave
    3 days 22 hours ago
    The cardinal played an important role in the election of Leo XIV. But with the previous pontiff he was close to "losing his hat". Here's whyAll observers agree on the role played by Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke in the last Conclave. But in the circles around the sacred rooms, these days, more than one anecdote is being told about how (and why) the American cardinal was close to "losing his hat" Catholic Conclavehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06227218883606585321noreply@blogger.com0
  39. Site: Crisis Magazine
    3 days 22 hours ago
    Author: Eric Sammons

    Bishop Robert Barron recently appeared on the Tucker Carlson Show, in a wide-ranging discussion that covered prayer, evolution, AI, the New Atheist Movement, and about a dozen more topics. Naturally, the Catholic world was excited by a Catholic bishop—and one of our most well-spoken—appearing in front of such a large, and mostly non-Catholic, audience. How would he do? What would he say?

    Source

  40. Site: Crisis Magazine
    3 days 22 hours ago
    Author: Glen Sproviero

    A practical statesman and careful observer of human nature, John Adams viewed abstract formulas for the perfection of society with deep suspicion. So hard held was this view that he decried ideology—the premise that the ends of human existence, even salvation, can be achieved in the earthly realm through adherence to a set of secular beliefs—as “the science of idiocy.” Two centuries later…

    Source

  41. Site: Catholic Conclave
    3 days 22 hours ago
    Father Bergoglio, the writer Borges and doubts of faithAn interesting, but terrible, note on the judgment of the great atheist writer Jorge Luis Borges on the future Pope Francis, Jorge Mario Bergoglio."But there is something that alarms me a little; I noticed that he has as many doubts as I do. Which I don't know if it's right in a religious person. My mother would be horrified by something likeCatholic Conclavehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06227218883606585321noreply@blogger.com0
  42. Site: Mises Institute
    4 days 41 min ago
    Author: Daniel Morena Viton
    Nominalist ideas influenced the scientific revolution, shaping its departure from metaphysics, its mechanistic perspective, and the mathematization of all sciences. This paradigm has brought about some errors in economic thinking.
  43. Site: Fr. Z's Blog
    4 days 3 hours ago
    Author: frz@wdtprs.com (Fr. John Zuhlsdorf)
    Just lately, I’ve had a number of emails telling me things like: “My email was hacked, so here is my new address.” “My credit card info was stolen, so I have to change my donation method.” “Someone I know got … Read More →
  44. Site: The Unz Review
    4 days 3 hours ago
    Author: Paul Craig Roberts
    The attack on Russian strategic forces by Ukraine, with or without President Trump’s knowledge and with or without help from Washington and the British, could have been the most dangerous event in East-West relations during my lifetime. The reason is that recently revised Russian war doctrine states that an attack, even by a non-nuclear country,...
  45. Site: The Unz Review
    4 days 3 hours ago
    Author: John Helmer
    With the Oreshnik Moment on pause, who will say what is to be gained, what risked, what lost when President Vladimir Putin decides to play Molotov (lead image, lower right) to these two Ribbentrops (lead image, top left and right)? “We have so much in common”, President Donald Trump was told yesterday by Friedrich Merz,...
  46. Site: The Unz Review
    4 days 3 hours ago
    Author: Jonathan Cook
    It is long past time Tzipi Hotovely was expelled from London. Starmer’s inaction proves he has no intention of stopping his support for Israel’s crimes in Gaza Keir Starmer has been desperately searching for ways to make it look as if his government is getting tough with Israel. As public anger grows at images from...
  47. Site: The Unz Review
    4 days 3 hours ago
    Author: Mike Whitney
    Tucker Carlson has posted an extraordinary article on X that could potentially stop a war with Iran. As everyone knows, Carlson's political views are admired by President Donald Trump who sees the former Fox commentator as a blunt, but fair-minded analyst who sees the world in similar terms as himself. And while there's no evidence...
  48. Site: The Unz Review
    4 days 3 hours ago
    Author: Eric Margolis
    Mutzig, France – First stop on my annual visit to France’s mighty Maginot Line forts is this lovely Alsatian town. Mutzig was built by the Germans 1893-1916 to defend against enemy approaches to the important city of Strasbourg. It was – and remains – the largest modern fortress in Europe. The vast fortress, which covers...
  49. Site: The Unz Review
    4 days 3 hours ago
    Author: Philip Giraldi
    It often pays, literally, to be perceived as a perpetual victim, a status that Israel and the Jewish institutional constituency have exploited relentlessly since 1945. It is now eighty years since the Second World War ended and the numbers of those receiving “holocaust” reparations from the German government hardly seems to diminish and may now...
  50. Site: The Unz Review
    4 days 3 hours ago
    Author: Paul Craig Roberts
    Now that some total idiot in the Trump regime has green-lighted an attack on Russian strategic forces, John Helmer raises for Putin Lenin’s question, “What is to be done?” As I understand it, Washington’s attack on Russian strategic forces is grounds under current Russian war doctrine for Putin to push the button. But Putin, unlike...

Pages

Subscribe to Distinction Matter - Subscribed Feeds