Distinction Matter - Subscribed Feeds

A physician who faced the specter of losing his license over his helping women try to save their unborn children exhorted pregnancy help professionals at the 2024 Heartbeat International Annual Conference to stay the course in doing the right thing when it come to standing for life.

“Never, ever get tired of doing what is right,” Dr. Dermot Kearney said. “It can be discouraging. There will be opposition. Sometimes you’ll fall and fail, but just get back up and never, ever get tired of doing what is right.”

Kearney, a cardiologist practicing in northeast England and president emeritus of the Catholic Medical Association (UK), addressed the Heartbeat Conference held in Salt Lake City, Utah, April 24-26.

Kearney was blocked by the UK medical authorities from providing Abortion Pill Reversal (APR) treatment and faced false charges of misconduct. Kearney withstood the suppression and eventually prevailed, as there was no evidence for the claims against him. Following this, another colleague in the UK who’d faced similar repression was also allowed to resume offering APR.

Click here to sign up for pro-life news alerts from LifeNews.com

Heartbeat is the largest network of pregnancy help in the U.S. and globally and manages the Abortion Pill Rescue® Network (APRN). Kearney was administering APR through the APRN.

Despite facing tremendous opposition of his own, Kearney said he and other UK providers have saved at least 61 babies so far—with more on the way—since 2020, when he began administering abortion pill reversal, the proven progesterone treatment to counteract mifepristone, the first abortion pill.

“I’ve been practicing medicine since 1989 and in those 35 years I’ve done various things in cardiology and general medicine and emergency medicine,” he said as photos of him with babies he’s saved covered the big screens beside him. “But this far and away is the most rewarding aspect of medical practice that I can obviously say that I’ve enjoyed.”

Kearney reported at least a 50% success rate (i.e., continued pregnancy and live birth) for his own patients who receive progesterone after taking only mifepristone. He compared this to a 1-2% survival rate when women take both mifepristone and misoprostol (the second pill in the abortion regimen), and a below-20% survival rate if women take only mifepristone but do not receive progesterone.

“On the basis of the data that we have managed to collect, if they go ahead with the abortion rescue treatment, we can more than double the rate of survival of the babies,” Kearney said. “I have found that if we can get to 15 weeks there’s a very good chance that their baby will be okay.”

(In the U.S., success rates tend to be closer to 64-68%, he noted, due in part to easier ultrasound access.)

On the occasions when he was unable to restore a pregnancy, he drew encouragement from his colleague Dr. Eileen Reilly, the first UK doctor to attempt abortion pill reversal, who reminded him, “Even if you save one life, it’s all worthwhile.”

Opposition to saving lives

Kearney’s success in saving lives, however, drew fire from the UK medical establishment.

Before implementing the protocol himself in 2020, Kearney had approached the National Health Service, the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, and the Royal College of General Practitioners, hoping they would get behind this life-saving treatment, given the accumulating evidence of its effectiveness. They did not.

Instead, unbeknownst to him, an investigation by the General Medical Council, UK’s medical licensing authority, began in January 2021 after the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, along with the pro-abortion organization Marie Stopes International, accused him of professional misconduct. In all, 10 allegations and charges were brought against him.

On May 12, 2021, Dr. Kearney was taken before the medical tribunal and there prohibited from prescribing, administering, or recommending progesterone for Abortion Pill Reversal treatments—a step back from the General Medical Council’s call to completely suspend his license.

“The result is that I’m the first doctor in history, I think, to be banned from saving lives,” he said.

Ironically, on May 11, just one day before this decision, another baby he had saved with progesterone was born.

A legal team from Christian Concern’s Christian Legal Center took Kearney’s case out of the hands of the medical tribunal—where only the charges were being evaluated, not the evidence—and carried it to the High Court in London. Kearney was scheduled to appear on February 24, 2022. A mere six days beforehand, he learned that all charges were dropped.

“The words they used were, ‘there was no prospect of obtaining any evidence to support the allegations of professional misconduct,’” Kearney said.

Coercion, misinformation, and pressure to abort continue for UK women

Peppering his Conference presentation with a mix of statistics from his practice and stories of his patients’ desperate search for a way to save their pregnancies, Kearney pointed out that women in the UK are often pressured to pursue abortion.

One woman with the pseudonym “Victoria,” depressed by her boyfriend’s abandonment, was told by her family doctor that she wasn’t ready to parent and should abort her baby. Following that advice, she took the first abortion pill and immediately regretted her choice. She contacted Kearney, who successfully sustained her pregnancy with progesterone.

Later in that preserved pregnancy, her psychiatrist again recommended abortion. Instead, she went on to deliver a healthy baby boy several months later. However, social services took her newborn away from her, apparently because she had refused to follow her psychiatrist’s advice. Only after a legal battle was she able to regain custody of her son.

“Sarah,” already raising a daughter, considered abortion out of fear of financial difficulties. Though she cried hysterically in her doctor’s office, the doctor handed her mifepristone and a glass of water and said, “Well, are you going to take it or not?” Sarah swallowed the pill, convinced she had no other option.

As she left the office with misoprostol in hand for later use, “Sarah” wished she could vomit up the pill she had taken. She rushed home and searched online for help, found the Abortion Pill Rescue Network, and a nurse connected her with Kearney. After treatment with progesterone, she went on to deliver a baby boy.

In December 2023, Kearney received a call from another woman who had heard of his success with “Sarah” and needed the same help. Her rescued baby is due within a few months of this writing.

“Sometimes we get these new cases that come to us when there’s no other way, because the women now go to abortion providers to be actively told, ‘If you change your mind—you shouldn’t—but if you do, do not seek abortion reversal,’” Kearney said.

“There was a time in 2020, early 2021, I was getting six calls a week, three some days, weekends especially,” he said. “But now it’s down to two or three a month. With the other providers, it is more or less the same. So, the numbers have dried up largely because of the opposition.”

Hope through a window of opportunity

Kearney estimated that in 2023 there were about 250,000 abortions among a population of 60 million people in the UK, “and close to 90% are carried out by drug-induced means.”

“That gives a window of opportunity,” he said.

“When surgical abortion takes place, once that instrument is introduced there’s no going back,” said Kearney. “But there is a slight window of opportunity, at least in some cases, if the mother changes her mind after she’s taken that first abortion pill. That’s where the Abortion Pill Rescue Network comes into play.”

As part of the Network, Christa Brown, Heartbeat International’s Director of Medical Impact, spoke of Kearney’s remarkable determination to help women save their babies.

She said, “There are very few who would tell a team of hotline nurses, ‘Call me anytime day or night because women deserve the right to abortion pill reversal.’”

“There are very few who would ask a patient, ‘Do you have a way to get to the pharmacy?’ and if not, send a taxi on their own dime,” Brown said. “There are very few who would ask the woman, ‘Do you have funds to pay for this prescription?’ and if not, send their dear wife Mary with a credit card to pay for that life-giving progesterone.”

“There are very few who,” continued Brown, “when their very livelihood and medical licensing and professional reputation are threatened and they’re under investigation and faced with restrictions for months on end, when colleagues turn their backs and all they’ve worked so hard for is at risk, will stand strong and say, ‘I work for the Lord, not man.’

“Today there’s a call to courage for all of us, just as in the days of the Underground Railroad and the times of the midwives who were ordered by law to end the lives of the baby boys,” Brown said. “This is not a time for retreat. This is a time for courage.”

Heartbeat International presented Kearney with it’s Servant Leader Award following his address, Kearney unaware he would be receiving the honor. The Servant Leader Award honors those who, in the example of Christ, lead and serve concurrently.

LifeNews Note: Karen Ingle writes for PregnancyHelpNews, where this originally appeared.

The post Pro-Life Doctor Shares How He Saved Babies From Death in the Middle of the Abortion appeared first on LifeNews.com.

Pro-abortion groups have become bolder and more aggressive since the Dobbs decision was handed down in June 2022.

The latest pro-abortion messaging says it all: “Roe was always the floor, not the ceiling.”

We know that pro-abortion groups and their allies are bent on making abortion available on demand until birth so it’s not surprising that they have shifted from saying abortion should be “safe, legal, and rare” to “Roe was always the floor, not the ceiling.”

Roe was not enough and has never been enough for pro-abortion groups.

The latest PR campaign by pro-abortion groups is to muddy the water by claiming that abortion is “health care” and that women will die without it. The go-to arguments from pro-abortion groups involve rage, misinformation, rage, lies, and more rage.

Abortion groups have a lot of sympathizers and allies – everyone from the American Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists to the editorial board at the New York Times. Pushing back against the pro-abortion agenda can feel like we are rolling a boulder uphill only to have it slide down again at the end of the day.

SUPPORT LIFENEWS! To help us fight Joe Biden’s abortion agenda, please help LifeNews.com with a donation!

It can feel frustrating, tiring – even fruitless.

But you can help and make an impact by doing three things:

Be knowledgeable

Know the facts about abortion statistics, the number of women seeking abortions and why. Learn about the development of the preborn baby and how she is growing at every stage of development. Read NRL News cover-to-cover and subscribe to NRL News Today. There is no greater way to learn accurate information in one place—unless you are planning on attending the National Right to Life Conference in June!

Be compassionate

Many of us respond on social media to comments made by family and friends on everything from someone’s new haircut to their new job. However, on issues that can be deeply painful and personal, we all know how cutting remarks and harsh words can come across. When responding to family and friends who may be pro-abortion, we need to respond with compassion. Social media can hinder communication because we can’t see facial expressions or gestures. People can gauge intent only by reading the words we choose. Even when dealing with reporters, we have to remember that they, too, may have had an abortion and will write a story through the lens of personal experience.

Be bold in your response

Don’t hesitate to respond to things you see in the news. While newspapers still publish op-eds and letters to the editor, the majority also allow comments directly below an article. Getting an op-ed or a letter published can delay a response to mean not getting one in at all if your op-ed doesn’t make the cut. However, responding in the comments section with concise and compassionate arguments can make a difference by addressing errors in reporting and winning hearts and minds.

We have truth on our side, but we need to present it and let people see it. They need to see the pro-life movement as it is—wonderful caring individuals who love and cherish life for both mother and child.

LifeNews.com Note: Laura Echevarria is the Director of Media Relations and a spokesperson for the National Right to Life Committee.

The post They Don’t Just Want Roe v. Wade, They Want Abortions Up to Birth Nationwide appeared first on LifeNews.com.

A Florida bill, the Heartbeat Protection Act (HPA), went into effect on Wednesday, which increases protections for the unborn after six-weeks, as opposed to the state’s previous 15-week rule. The HPA initially became law in April 2023 as part of the Florida Supreme Court’s decision that abortion is not a given right under the Constitution. That decision was key in upholding the 15-week law, and only a month later, proved relevant to the six-week law.

Several Democrats have made their opposition to the bill known. For instance, Vice President Kamala Harris claimed the law was “extreme,” blaming former President Donald Trump for the so-called “harmful state abortion bans.” Additionally, Planned Parenthood Vice President of Communications Michelle Quesada sent an email to WORLD Magazine that “claimed the new law is devastating for Floridians.” But as Family Research Council President Tony Perkins highlighted on Wednesday’s episode of “Washington Watch,” the bill is far from devastating for most Floridians.

“[T]he reality,” he stated, “is the American people are not where the Democratic Party and Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are at on this issue.” He added that Democrats “want abortion until birth with taxpayer funds. That’s what they’re calling for,” whereas Florida at large is a proponent of life. In addition, Florida State Rep. Mike Beltran (R) pointed out, “Florida is well in line with the rest of the region of the country.”

Beltran recalled how Florida’s 2022 15-week bill coincided with the Dobbs decision, which ultimately led to an increase in “the number of abortions in Florida.” Why? Because, as he explained, Dobbs allowed states to pass stronger pro-life laws which caused people seeking abortion in the surrounding area to go to Florida, where the threshold was more moderate. For Beltran, “the idea that Florida is some sort of an outlier, I think is absurd.”

Click Like if you are pro-life to like the LifeNews Facebook page!

(function(d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js#xfbml=1&version=v2.10"; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); }(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));

Even so, Perkins noted that the Democrats are still trying to “paint Florida as extreme.” But as Beltran pointed out, Florida’s bill is “still more lenient than much of the rest of the deep … mid-South and parts of the Midwest.” Ultimately, he urged, “I think that [pro-abortion] folks in the rest of the South and maybe people in the North are aggrieved that it’s going to be a little bit harder to practice abortion tourism.”

He added, “And I make no apology for that. We have beaches, and we have parks, and we have good weather. Abortion is not part of what we’re marketing for tourism to the rest of the country.”

Despite the good news of HPA taking effect, Perkins raised the concern that this fall “… the pro-abortion crowd has put onto the ballot initiative” a measure that “would enshrine abortion into the Constitution at the point of viability.” He asked, “How does that stand, and what do pro-life voters in Florida need to be doing?”

Beltran answered, “People need to understand just how extravagant this proposed constitutional amendment is. It gets rid, up until viability … all restrictions on abortion.” It gets “rid of mandatory ultrasounds, waiting periods, health and safety regulations, informed consent laws — even parental consent is going to go out the window.”

“[W]e need to get the word out,” he insisted. The abortion activists’ ballot measure is “not a moderate thing. It’s not just targeted at our heartbeat bill. … It … completely gets rid of all our [pro-life efforts].”

LifeNews Note: Sarah Holliday is a reporter at The Washington Stand, where this originally appeared.

The post Florida’s Heartbeat Law Now Protects Babies, But We Must Stop Amendment 4 and Abortions Up to Birth appeared first on LifeNews.com.

Today the “Committee for Constitutional Freedom” (to kill babies and harm women) has delivered signed petitions to Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft. The signatures must be from six of eight Congressional districts and must equal 8% of the votes that were cast in the last Gubernatorial election in each district, so the total number needed varies depending on the districts in which they collected signatures.

This process, which began a year ago in March, started with the filing of multiple pro-abortion petitions. Secretary of State Ashcroft wrote truthful ballot language which was challenged by the abortion advocates and ultimately ended with the court using the pro-abortion ACLU language as the deceptive ballot language. To read the truth about this deceptive initiative petition go to Devastating-Impact-of-Pro-Abortion-Initiative-Petition-2024-086-MRL-Legal-Analysis.pdf (missourilife.org).

The next step in this process will be the Secretary of State’s office verifying all signatures.

In our Decline to Sign Campaign, Missouri Right to Life has educated and activated countless Missourians to fight the battle to “Keep Missouri Pro-Life!” We have done polling, hired trusted political consultants to develop messaging, done major gifts fundraising and continue to engage more and more people to fight this battle. We have developed a network of pro-life organizations from across the state as partners in this effort and this network will grow as we work together in the days ahead.

We thank everyone who has worked to get the truth out about the extreme pro-abortion initiative petition. We will continue to work to protect innocent babies and their moms from the lies of the abortion industry.

To join our efforts go to: Donate – Missouri Right to Life (www.missourilife.org).

The post Missouri Pro-Life Group Will Fight Amendment to Legalize Abortions Up to Birth appeared first on LifeNews.com.

Yesterday, May 1st, the Pro-Abortion Group “Dakotans for Health” held a press conference in Sioux Falls to unveil their Abortion Constitutional Amendment’s 55,000 petition signatures.  They have now turned them into the South Dakota Secretary of State’s Office in their hopes of placing this Abortion Constitutional Amendment on the ballot this November.

Across the street from the press conference Pro-Life SD Friends stepped up to the plate in opposition of this Amendment and for the Sanctity of Human Life (see photo below).

The deceptive language of the Abortion Amendment not only inserts cruel abortion up to birth into our state’s constitution but eliminates a parent’s right to know if an abortion is going to be performed on their minor daughter.

On top of this, the so-called “Dakotans for Health” organization used such underhanded tactics to secure signatures that the Attorney General issued a warning. Matters did not improve.

South Dakota Right to Life, along with the Life Defense Fund, and our many Pro-Life Allies, will make every effort in protecting our constitution, the rule of law, and the well-being of South Dakota’s women and children.”

In response to the submission of the Abortion Amendment Petition, Jon Hansen and Leslee Unruh, Co-Chairs of Life Defense Fund, said they will challenge the legitimacy of the Abortion Amendment Petition. They issued the following statement.

HELP LIFENEWS SAVE BABIES FROM ABORTION! Please help LifeNews.com with a donation!

Despite clear warnings from the Attorney General, thousands of signatures were collected by Rick Weiland’s organization in violation of South Dakota law.

If you signed this petition, did they tell you the Abortion Amendment would legalize late-term abortion after the baby is viable outside the womb and up to birth? Did they tell you the Abortion Amendment endangers women by banning safety standards for most abortions? Did they tell you the Abortion Amendment takes away parents’ right to know when their minor daughter is seeking an abortion?

In response to the unlawful and misleading actions of Rick Weiland and his paid petition circulators, Life Defense Fund will challenge the legitimacy of the Abortion Amendment petition in court.

Background: Life Defense Fund has collected evidence showing that Rick Weiland’s paid Abortion Amendment petition circulators failed to distribute the required circulator handout information to petition signers, failed to personally witness petition signatures, and even told citizens to sign the Abortion Amendment petition twice–all serious violations of South Dakota petition law. Moreover, Life Defense Fund has documented numerous instances where members of the public, upon asking to sign the petition to repeal the tax on groceries, were handed the Abortion Amendment petition to sign instead.

LifeNews Note: Dale Bartscher is the Executive Director of South Dakota Right to Life

The post South Dakota Voters Should Oppose Radical Abortion Amendment to Make Killing Babies a “Right” appeared first on LifeNews.com.

“The extraordinary Red stress on confession betrays the extreme importance they attach to it . . . . Something intrinsic in communism makes this confession phenomenon indispensable to it; it can’t exist without it.” 

Edward Hunter, Brainwashing (1956)

We normally associate the word confession with an admission of guilt, as when a criminal confesses to his crime, or when a Catholic unburdens himself in the confessional.  We may however begin to suspect that there is more to confession that this when we consider that many Christian churches use the word confession as a synonym for creed.  Thus, we have the Westminster Confession, or the Augsburg Confession.

This second usage is much closer to the original meaning of the word, which was to admit some truth together. Con (together) + fateri (to admit) = confession.

The Christian confessions are described as “confessions of faith,” so that a “confessor” is one who agrees with every article in the public declaration of faith—the confession—with which he agrees.  With this in mind, we can see that, strictly speaking, a wrongdoer confesses only when he is confronted with an accusation and, rather than deny it, he agrees that it is true.

As noted in my epigraph, confession was an important part of Communist mind control, and confession remains an important element in contemporary Leftism.  We see this when a public assembly opens with collective acknowledgement of an “historic injustice,” such as slavery or the Holocaust, or with the avowal that the assembly is taking place on “stolen land.”  Participants in these rituals do not, so far as I know, thump themselves on the chest in the manner of penitent Catholics, but their public confessions tell us that they are engaged in ritual behavior.

Confession is ultimately submission to the authority with which one joins in admitting the truth of the confession, and it becomes a double submission when that truth is that one has one’s self been bad.  If a policeman accuses me of speeding and I confess, I am agreeing that the officer is not only correct about the velocity of my vehicle, but that he is also correct in thinking that the velocity of my vehicle is the concern of the police and the politicians who tell him what to do.

When I admit the crime, I submit to the officer and the official world of which he is a part.  I acknowledge their authority and place myself in their power.

Once we see the connection between confession, submission, and power, we will begin to understand why confession is so central in mind control.  If I, for instance, confess to whiteness, transphobia, and a preference for plastic straws, I submit to the official world that proscribes whiteness, transphobia, and a preference for plastic straws.  I confess that that world is the correct world, and that I, myself, have wronged.

To confess a truth is submission.  It is a double submission when the truth I confess is that I have wronged.  It is a triple submission—an absolute humiliation or abasement—when the wrongs that I confess are preposterous and absurd.

“I confess to almighty Gaia,
And to you, my brothers and sisters,
That I have greatly sinned;
Through my unprogressive thoughts,
And in my non-inclusive words,
In carbon footprints I have made,
And reparations I have failed to pay,
Through my fault, through my fault,
Through my most grievous fault;
Therefore I ask blessed Harriet Tubman,
All BIPOCs and queers,
To pray for me to Mama Earth and the Arc of History.

Humiliation and abasement are preparations for instruction, for one acutely feels the need for instruction when one has just confessed to gross errors and preposterous wrongs.  Propaganda is combined with confession because the ego is naturally proud, and therefor resistant to instruction and correction.  Rites of Leftist contrition confess, most essentially, a desperate and crying need for instruction.

“‘Learning’ and confession are inseparable from brainwashing . . . . Learning in this sense means only political teaching from the communist standpoint.  Confession is an integral part of the rites.”**

Propaganda is also combined with confusion because confusion creates a feeling of helplessness, and hence intense craving for help.  Confession plants the idea of moral inferiority; confusion plants the idea of intellectual inferiority.  The means is to set the mind a puzzle that cannot be solved, and to thereby break the thinker’s confidence in his independent power to make sense of the world.  This is done by battering his brain with mumbo-jumbo, false logic, and contradiction.

“Brainwashing is a system of befogging the brain so a person can be seduced into acceptance of what otherwise would be abhorrent to him.”***

Curiously, the effectiveness of confusion positively correlates with the intelligence of the one who is confused.  A stupid man is confused most of the time, so he is hardly discouraged by the discovery that there is one more thing in this world that he does not understand.  His brain has been befogged since birth.  It is the intelligent man whose will can can be broken on the rack of confusion.

Communists learned this from Pavlov’s experiments, although wily men have understood the demoralizing power of mumbo-jumbo for a very long time.  What Pavlov first discovered is, of course, that a dog can be conditioned to salivate at the sound of a bell.  This conditioning is accomplished by repeatedly ringing a bell when the dog is fed, until the dog at last reacts to the sound of the bell as it reacts to the presence of the food.  What Pavlov next discovered is that a dog thus conditioned will be demoralized, perhaps even suffer a nervous breakdown, if the sound of a bell is sometimes accompanied by food, and sometimes is not.

The demoralizing effect is worse in an intelligent dog that had figured out the old bell-chow connection, and was therefore proud to think it had figured out how the world works.†. This dog feels the defeat of its intellect when it fails to find the hidden meaning in a new pattern, which is not in fact a pattern, and which has in fact no meaning.   This may be why intelligent men are so often sedated and seduced by preposterous theories.

*) Edward Hunter, Brainwashing: The Story of the Men Who Defied It. (New York: Farrar, Straus, and Cudahy, 1956), p. 237.
**) Hunter, Brainwashing, p. 222.
***) Hunter, Brainwashing, p. 223.
†) John B. McConaughy, “A Review of Soviet Psychological Warfare,” Military Review, 40.9 (Dec. 1960), pp. 3-13.

Donald Trump has reminded pro-life voters at recent rallies that there are important consequences on abortion for not voting for him for president over Joe Biden.

Trump says pro-life Americans need to vote for him because Joe Biden will push abortions up to birth if he is elected for another four year term.

Biden has repeatedly said he would sign measures to put Roe v. Wade back in place, overturn every pro-life law nationwide and appoint radically pro-abortion judges to the Supreme Court to overturn the Dobbs decision. In addition he’s already push abortion funding, turning VA clinics into abortion clinics and fought in court to force pro-life states to kill babies in abortions.

On the other hand, Trump crafted the most pro-life record of any president since Roe v. Wade.

But, as Trump reminds voters, he can’t stop Biden’s abortion agenda if he’s not elected.

Trump said at one point during a recent speech that “getting elected is also important … a lot of bad things will happen beyond abortion if you don’t win.”

SUPPORT LIFENEWS! To help us fight Joe Biden’s abortion agenda, please help LifeNews.com with a donation!

Trump also told supporters that abortion is a risky issue for Republican candidates, and “you have to get elected” in order to get anything done about protecting more babies from abortions.

The Biden administration has employed a whole-of-government approach to promoting abortion, using every lever of power at its disposal to make abortions more available and more common, with no thought of the innocent unborn children who will die or the mothers who could be harmed.

“This administration has done more to bring harm to mothers and their unborn babies through abortion than any other administration,” said Carol Tobias of National Right to Life.

The post Trump: Vote for Me to Stop Biden From Pushing Abortions Up to Birth appeared first on LifeNews.com.

Abortion supporters falsely claim that abortion bans cause higher maternal mortality. But, new data from the CDC shows that maternal mortality is down in 2023 even after 20 states passed abortion bans to protect moms and babies.

In fact, the new CDC numbers show that the maternal mortality rate was cut almost in half from 2021 before the Supreme Court issued its Dobbs ruling until last year when 20 states had passed abortion bans.

If claims from pro-abortion groups were true the maternal death rate would be higher.

Here’s more:

The agency on Thursday released a report detailing the final maternal mortality data for 2022.

About 680 women died last year during pregnancy or shortly after childbirth, according to provisional CDC data. That’s down from 817 deaths in 2022 and 1,205 in 2021, when it was the highest level in more than 50 years.

The CDC counts women who die while pregnant, during childbirth and up to 42 days after birth from conditions considered related to pregnancy. Excessive bleeding, blood vessel blockages and infections are leading causes.

REACH PRO-LIFE PEOPLE WORLDWIDE! Advertise with LifeNews to reach hundreds of thousands of pro-life readers every week. Contact us today.

There were about 19 maternal deaths for every 100,000 live births in 2023, according to the provisional data. That’s in line with rates seen in 2018 and 2019.

Experts confirm that higher maternal mortality is not linked to pro-life laws or abortion bans.

The former director of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Dr. Julie Louise Gerberding, demonstrated that a comparison between the two statistics is inappropriate. In 2004, she wrote that maternal mortality ratios and abortion mortality rates “are conceptually different and are used by CDC for different public health purposes.”

In fact studies show that childbirth is better for women than abortion. Studies from countries with good data show that a woman is at least three times as likely to die from any cause following abortion than after childbirth.

Dr. Monique Chireau Wubbenhorst, a senior research associate at the DeNicola Center for Ethics and Culture at the University of Notre Dame and a board-certified OB-GYN, told a U.S. House committee that legalized abortion does not help reduce maternal mortality. On the contrary, countries with pro-life laws have some of the lowest maternal mortality rates in the world, she said.

“… until recently in countries where abortion was criminalized and prohibited, I’m thinking particularly of Chile, Ireland and, I think, Cyprus had the lowest rates of maternal mortality in the world. For several years consecutively, Ireland had zero maternal mortality at a time when abortion was completely illegal,” Wubbenhorst said at the time.

Many studies suggest the widespread legalization and availability of elective abortions harm women as well as their unborn babies. In a column at The Federalist in October, Dr. Grazie Pozo Christie, a radiology specialist in Florida, said some researchers have found that abortions are more dangerous than childbirth for mothers.

Pro-life laws save lives: mothers and babies. In Texas alone, a new study by Johns Hopkins found that nearly 10,000 more babies were born after its heartbeat law went into effect in 2021. In the past year since the Dobbs v. Jackson ruling, researchers believe tens of thousands more babies also have been saved.

Meanwhile, there have not been any reports of pregnant mothers dying because of pro-life laws. Every abortion ban or restriction includes clear language that protects pregnant mothers as well as their unborn babies. Pro-life laws include exceptions to save the life of the mother and allow miscarriage care.

The overturning of Roe v. Wade will lead to more lives being saved – a fact that abortion activists want Americans to ignore.

The post Maternal Deaths Fall From Pre-Dobbs High as Almost 20 States Ban Abortions appeared first on LifeNews.com.

A CNN report on the head of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, Kristen Clarke, is drawing accusations that the outlet sought to curry favor with President Joe Biden’s DOJ through its framing.

After The Daily Signal published a report on Tuesday highlighting evidence that Clarke had not disclosed an arrest and an expungement during her nomination process to the DOJ—and then explicitly denied ever having been arrested to Arkansas Republican Sen. Tom Cotton—CNN published a report on Wednesday headlined “DOJ civil rights leader says she was a victim of abuse in extraordinary statement.”

CNN’s Hannah Rabinowitz framed the story around an “exclusive” statement from Clarke to the outlet, in which Clarke confirms that she did not disclose her arrest and expungement and alleged that her ex-husband, Reginald Avery, had domestically abused her for years. Avery, who previously said that Clarke attacked him with a knife in 2006 while they were married, denied his ex-wife’s allegations in a statement to The Daily Signal on Thursday. He also called CNN’s story “a hit piece.”

“Clarke’s now-expunged arrest, which reportedly occurred during a domestic dispute, quickly became a cause célèbre among right-wing media and lawmakers who claim she lied during her 2021 Senate confirmation hearing, with some calling for her resignation,” wrote Rabinowitz, who did not clarify to The Daily Signal why she did not link to the original Daily Signal report.

LifeNews is on GETTR. Please follow us for the latest pro-life news

CNN did not immediately respond to The Daily Signal’s request for comment on the story.

Commentator Stephen Miller called out Rabinowitz in a tweet Wednesday evening.

“To be clear what happened here,” he tweeted. “1. Kristen Clarke, the head of Biden’s DOJ Civil Rights Division, did not disclose an arrest from a domestic fight 2. CNN took the original report, omitted that fact she lied under oath, did not link to the original story, and framed Clarke’s own statement.”

The Federalist Editor-in-Chief Mollie Hemingway similarly accused Rabinowitz of running cover for the DOJ: “CNN propagandist Hannah Rabinowitz was asked by DOJ to spread this info op and she complied, hiding the explosive journalism which provoked it.”

Author Steve Krakauer, the executive producer of “The Megyn Kelly Show,” said it was “outrageous journalistic malpractice for CNN leadership to hang a young reporter out to dry like this, slapping her byline on propaganda spin of an administration, and diminishing actual journalism in the process.”

Chuck Ross, an investigative reporter at The Washington Free Beacon, also weighed in on CNN’s framing.

“Amazing,” said Ross. “After @MaryMargOlohan reports that DOJ’s Kristen Clarke lied about being arrested, Clarke runs to CNN with a claim that she lied only because she was the victim of domestic abuse. And CNN spins it with the typical ‘conservatives pounce’ framing.”

“Domestic abuse is never okay,” said Republican Utah Sen. Mike Lee, in response to the CNN story. “U.S. Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke said ‘no’ when asked by the Senate Judiciary Committee whether she had ever been arrested for a violent crime. That wasn’t true.”

New York Times reporter Glenn Thrush quickly criticized Lee for the remark, appearing to defend Clarke without acknowledging her omission to the Senate Judiciary Committee. “Clarke said she was subjected to years of abuse by her ex-husband—and her arrest for slashing his finger was expunged,” he wrote, in response to Lee. “She said she’s still ‘terrorized and traumatized.’ The senator, who initially presented this incident without that context now makes this statement.”

Ross followed up on Thrush’s remark, challenging him: “Come on. She lied to the Senate about ever being arrested. DOJ didn’t reply to the reporter who broke this story, @MaryMargOlohan. The White House mocked her when she asked for comment. Then Clarke goes to CNN with a defense of her arrest that may or may not be true.”

“Clarke deceived the Senate too many times during her confirmation regarding her position on defunding police and writing anti-white essays in college for anyone, much less an NYT reporter, to take her claims at face value,” Ross added.

LifeNews Note: Mary Margaret Olohan writes for Daily Signal, where this article originally appeared. 

The post CNN Covers for Biden Staffer Kristen Clarke, Radical Abortion Activist Who Lied Under Oath appeared first on LifeNews.com.