One can readily admit that the Magisterium's manner of expression does not seem very easy to understand at times. It needs to be translated by preachers and catechists into a language which relates to people and to their respective cultural environments. The essential content of the Church's teaching, however, must be upheld in this process. It must not be watered down on allegedly pastoral grounds, because it communicates the revealed truth.
Telegram Channels
Today's Mass
Traditional Liturgical Calendar
Tags
abortion
anti-Catholicism
anti-Christianity
anti-Russian propaganda
apostasy
Bergoglio anti-Catholicism
Bergoglio effect
Bergoglio heresy
Bergoglio homosexualism
Bergoglio idiocy
Bergoglioism
Bergoglio pontificate failure
Bp. Athanasius Schneider
CallMeJorge
Cardinal Müller
Cardinal Robert Sarah
Cdl. Raymond Burke
China
Church in Germany
Church revival
Covid19 coronavirus totalitarianism
culture of death
diabolical disorientation
DNC
Donald Trump
E.U.
EponymousFlower
euthanasia
feminism
Fr. Allan J. McDonald
Fr. John Hunwicke
Fr. John Zuhlsdorf
Fr. Peter Carota
Fr. Ray Blake
France
Germany
GlobalResearch
Gloria.tv
Gregory DiPippo
Holy Communion for lechers
homosexualism
homosexuality
intra-Church persecution
ISIS
Islam
Islamisation
Laura Wood
leftism
LifeNews
LifeSiteNews
Louie Verrecchio
Maike Hickson
marriage
Matthew Archbold
Michael Matt
modernism
Mundabor
Novus Motus Liturgicus
Novus Ordo
Novus Ordo apostasy
Novus Ordo filth
Novusordoism
Novus Ordo Missae
NovusOrdoWatch
OnePeterFive
papal heresy
papal piracy
papal scandal
persecution
Peter Hitchens
Peter Kwasniewski
political correctness
Pope Benedict XVI
Roberto de Mattei
Ron Paul Institute
Rorate Caeli
Russia
SSPX
Steve Skojec
StrategicCulture.org
Sweden
Syrian war
Tantumblogo
The Remnant
totalitarianism
traditionalism
transgenderism
Tridentine Mass
U.K. decline
U.S. circus
U.S. decline
U.S. militarism
U.S. roguery
Ukraine
Vatican II
Vladimir Putin
VoxCantoris
Western civilisation downfall
Western decadence
Western intervention
Popular Threads
Recent Comments
-
Lina Cata
great!
A decade of being graced with the Tridentine Mass · 1 year ago
-
olhg1
Fr. Kloster. Inside the monstrance and tabernacle is Jesus, God Almighty, not His Name. Jesus and His Name are two different realities.
-
Mary Ann Kreitzer
I can't remember who referred me to your article, but I thought it was very sound. Thanks for following my blog. May God keep our little apostolates of truth on the right track doing His will in...
On the Cardinal Pell case only the facts of this case matter, a point seemingly lost on most · 5 years ago
-
LocutusOP
I am honoured you took time to visit my blog. I have been a long-time follower of yours and I suppose you found mine through a pingback. The appeal decision comes out this week, if I'm not...
On the Cardinal Pell case only the facts of this case matter, a point seemingly lost on most · 5 years ago
-
BlackMario
Poor!!!
YdraftEven by Bergoglio's insanely absurd crazy standards, the ring-kissing switcheroo is weird... · 6 years ago
...
...
...
DMill • 11 days ago
...
Jerry • 11 days ago
...
Robert Dahl • 11 days ago
...
Suriani • 11 days ago
...
Christopher Mayerle • 11 days ago
...
jola szymanska • 11 days ago
...
...
...
Rory Donnellan • 10 days ago
...
...
...
...
Antrodemus • 8 days ago
Nothing here quite adds up. It is odd, to put it mildly, to bomb ISIS one day and to bomb ISIS's main Syrian enemy (i.e., the Assad government) the next day. And if the alleged or real use of chemical weapons by bad actors is a suitable cause for military action, it is equally odd that, by implication, we are suggesting that the bad actors are safe if they stick to bombs, bullets, clubs, and rocks to kill people. It is hard to believe that Trump does not have the sense to see these points.
Under the previous and unlamented administration, the theory was allegedly that we would overthrow or at least tame Assad, so that the Syrian people could sally forth to create a liberal democratic state in which all would live happily ever after. Again, it is hard to believe that Trump, the man who can readily identify a foreign poop-hole, is unable to see that Syria is and is going to remain a poop-hole, regardless of what we do or whom we do or do not bomb.
Is Israel putting us up to it? But if Iran is an "existential threat" to Israel because of its alleged or real nuclear weapons program, bombing an Iranian pawn in Syria does nothing to make it less of a threat. (If your enemy is bringing his shotgun down to point at your midriff, the penknife in his pocket is probably irrelevant.) And if Iran is not deemed by Israel to be an "existential threat" because of its alleged or real nuclear weapons program, then the point of all the propaganda is to stir us into a confrontation that would harm Iran and benefit the Sunni Arabs. But why would Israel, unless insanity has seized their government, think that ISIS-dominated regimes on its own borders are a good idea for its security?
There has to be something else going on here. Perhaps the point of the entire exercise was to send a message to North Korea and Iran that they cannot stop us from attacking them successfully
We can certainly trust likely bona fide traditionalists to see through the lies of the corrupt Western establishment, just as they see through the lies of the corrupt NOChurch hierarchy. It gives me comfort that readers of The Remnant do not side instintively with war, but apply their mind to current events.
Not a single commenter was in favour of NATO's hypocritical aggression towards Syria on account of the latest chemical weapons hoax/false flag - this particular one was a hoax. The Remnant deserves credit for that.
For sheer comedy, I shall have to highlight Jerry's contribution:
The best analysis though comes from Suriani, and he/she touches on a theme I myself have mentioned before, although the Japan connection I have not mentioned on this blog, not yet anyway, though I have mentioned it privately:
I am quite certain that the outcomes are intentional because I cannot see anybody being so stupid as to commit the same mistakes all over again despite receiving very nearly the same warnings time and time again. They want Christianity to die over there, as well as over here, and everywhere. Everything else is just smokes and mirrors.
The 'West' is the thing that ate up Christendom, and the U.S. is the free-masonic state upon which the de-Christianisation of the Christian continent is based. One can either defend Americanism or defend Christianity. One can either defend 'Western civilisation' or defend Christendom, but we can neither serve nor defend both at the same time since that would be defending that against which many of our forefathers in the faith died fighting.