Day's Links - 2018-08-26

Today's news could be called "Sexual abuse - Bergoglio implication edition". All the articles have to do with the implication of Bergoglio in the McCarrick scandal.

The news that Bergoglio has been firmly implicated in covering up for sodomitical homosexual abusers should in all earnesty surprise absolutely nobody. The man has had an attraction towards perversion as far back as his known history goes, and he has done very little to hide it either.

If one has not suspected Bergoglio of being partial to molesters and sodomites of various types then one has failed in the art of prudence.

I am joyous that this information has come out because it not only confirms what I and many others honest observers of Bergoglio have long concluded, but it also makes it easier for a Catholic pope in the future to consign his papacy with all its destructive legislations and confusions to the trash heap of history.

Many are already calling for him to resign, but I doubt he will. In fact, I dare to write that the most astonishing thing about this is how the media will ignore it after initial coverage. Bergoglio works for the other side, and has been enough dirt on him for the media to go after him long before the testimony of former nuncio Abp. Carlo Vigano. The fact that the media has not done it should be enough to prove a conspiracy involving Bergoglio, because ordinarily there is nothing the media revels in as much as a sexual scandal in the Catholic Church. The only way that the media will follow this up is if Bergoglio's NWO handlers deem him far too toxic and decide to take him out.

That the story broke on the climax of Bergoglio's homosexualising trip to Ireland for the World Meeting of Families only makes this story all the sweeter. It will be difficult for Novus Ordites to defend Bergoglio now, at least not while feigning outrage at sexual abuse. If nothing else, we should be gleeful in that.

The best thing about this story is that it now increases the likelihood that the Bergoglio brand will be so toxic that at the next conclave - soon, we hope - will select a man exactly the opposite of Bergoglio, or at least as close to that as one can come from the present College of Cardinals. It is highly unlikely that they would take the chance on another pervert in the Bergoglio mould, because the man is more trouble than he is worth. Mind you, it is not that I think they will suddenly adopt Catholicism as their creed, but rather that it will be in their best interest to at the very least do their best to distance themselves from the anti-Catholic and wordly ideas of Bergoglio and his ilk.