Distinction Matter - Subscribed Feeds

  1. Site: Zero Hedge
    4 days 12 hours ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    "There's A Lag In The Real Economy... And It's Hitting Now" - Ed Dowd Warns Of "Huge Credit Crisis Coming"

    Via Greg Hunter’s USAWatchdog.com,

    Former Wall Street money manager Ed Dowd is a skillful financial analyst.  Even though he has a wildly popular book on CV19 vax deaths and injuries called “Cause Unknown,” he is now turning his attention back to the economy. 

    Dowd warns the economy can fall out of bed at any time.  Dowd explains, “What’s coming up next is a credit cycle..."

    "We are going to see commercial real estate go into problem mode.  There are a lot of loans that need to be rolled over in 2024 and 25.  A lot of these properties are down 80%...

    There is huge credit risk coming.  The prediction of bank failures is accurate.  We are going to see, over the next 12 to 24 months, banks go belly-up.  Then, they will have to get merged with bigger banks.”

    What happens to the Biden economy?  Dowd says,

    “The economy is going to take a nosedive sometime in the next 12 months.  The real economy is not doing well...

    The only thing that has been holding up the GDP growth is government spending. 

    We are spending $1 trillion every 100 days.  That’s adding $1 trillion to the deficit. 

    The only job creation is government jobs, and they don’t actually add to the economy...

    Reports are coming out now that the low-income consumer is getting absolutely hammered.  McDonald’s talked about it in their most recent earnings call...

    So, low-income and the middle-class are getting squeezed while the rich continue to plug along.”

    Dowd told me off camera that the economy could get into trouble without warning.  Dowd explains,

    “You’ve got to look at history.  In 2008 and 2009, everyone talks about the crisis, but bank failures started showing up in 2007...

    I suspect as we roll through time in the real economy and the money supply issues start to hit the economy, we will see more bank failures and more businesses shut down. 

    46% of small businesses are having problems paying their rent.   There is going to come a time in the next 6 to 12 months this huge shock that we saw in the 2008 financial crisis, and the 2000 bubble where massive layoffs start to happen–it’s inevitable. 

    This is what happens when you crank up interest rates from 0% to 5.5%.  There is a lag in the real economy, and it’s hitting right now.  It’s only going to intensify as time goes on.

    Dowd likes gold as a core asset.  He also thinks the dollar has a way to go before it tanks, but it will tank someday. 

    Dowd also thinks that the CV19 bioweapon shot pushers are trying to change the narrative to admit “some deaths” happened, but the amount is small.  Dowd calls BS on that, and he thinks the death and injuries are at least 33 million in the USA alone. 

    According to Dowd’s research, the CV19 vax was a criminal enterprise that murdered and seriously harmed millions.  Dowd thinks the deaths and injuries from the CV19 vax are going to get worse.  Dowd thinks Johns Hopkins and the rest of the medical community are trying to change the narrative, so they don’t get blamed for pushing a massive death and disability CV19 vax program.

    There is much more in the 53-minute interview.

    Join Greg Hunter of USAWatchdog.com as he goes One-on-One with money manager and investment expert Ed Dowd, author of the recently updated book called “Cause Unknown: The Epidemic of Sudden Deaths in 2021, 2022 and 2023” for 5.11.24.

    *  *  *

    To Donate to USAWatchdog.com Click Here

    You can order Dowd’s newly updated book called “Cause Unknown” by clicking here. If you want to go to Dowd’s website called PhinanceTechnologies.com, click here.

    Tyler Durden Mon, 05/13/2024 - 14:40
  2. Site: RT - News
    4 days 12 hours ago
    Author: RT

    Opponents of new law say it will turn pimps into state-sanctioned ‘managers’

    A new labor law concerning Belgian sex workers will allow a pimp to demand that the government mediate in cases where a prostitute refuses sex with clients too frequently. Anti-prostitution activists say that the law will allow prostitutes’ managers to “further entrench and maintain their power.”

    Passed earlier this month, the law allows sex workers to obtain employment contracts from their pimps. These contracts classify prostitutes as hospitality employees and entitle them to health insurance, pensions, unemployment benefits, holidays and maternity leave.

    Pimps must be licensed by the government to issue employment contracts, and must allow prostitutes to refuse or to stop sex with clients for any reason. However, if a prostitute refuses or stops sex more than ten times over six months, their pimp can open a labor dispute and involve a government mediator.

    Belgium decriminalized sex work in 2022, allowing prostitutes to work as freelancers. However, employing a sex worker under contract remained a criminal offense, meaning that agreements between pimps and prostitutes existed in a legal gray area and contained no legally-binding protections for the prostitute.

    Read more General view of Red Light District on December 10, 2022 in Amsterdam, Netherlands Amsterdam plans to move ‘red light district’

    UTSOPI, a trade union for sex workers in Belgium, hailed the new law. “Without a labor law, sex workers would still be legally discriminated against,” UTSOPI spokesman Daan Bauwens said in a statement. “That is now over.”

    “We hope that other countries will copy this text, as they did on topics such as same-sex marriage, abortion, euthanasia and transgender rights,” Bauwens added. 

    However, anti-exploitation activist Andrea Heinz argued that the new model simply allows pimps to “become ‘managers’ with the backing of the state to further entrench and maintain their power.”

    “Pimps see women they sell as products, not people deserving of full dignity and respect,” Heinz wrote on X (formerly Twitter). “And ‘government mediator’...Wtf is that? Someone to mediate pimp-victim ‘contracts’, ie. gently encourage women to get back in the brothel bed when they are ‘not fulfilling their [sexual] obligations?’”

    According to official estimates from 2022, there are around 3,000 sex workers active in Belgium. However, some studies put that number at ten times higher. The Belgian Federal Police claimed in 2015 that around 26,000 women were working as prostitutes, and that 80% of them were being exploited by trafficking gangs from Bulgaria, Romania, Spain, Portugal, Hungary and Nigeria, among other countries.

     

  3. Site: RT - News
    4 days 12 hours ago
    Author: RT

    Former Kazakh cabinet member Kuandyk Bishimbayev was found guilty of the torture and murder of his 31-year-old spouse

    A court in Kazakhstan on Monday sentenced a former cabinet minister to 24 years in prison for brutally beating his wife to death. Kuandyk Bishimbayev, 44, was found guilty of the torture and murder of 31-year-old Saltanat Nukenova.

    The shocking murder took place in early November last year at a restaurant in the country’s capital Astana, where the two had apparently met to resolve their problems before the intoxicated Bishimbayev murdered the woman.

    Evidence presented to the court suggested that Nukenova had tried to leave her husband multiple times, claiming that he beat her on several occasions.

    CCTV footage played during the trial reportedly showed Bishimbayev repeatedly punching and kicking his wife, and dragging her into a room by her hair while nearly naked. The CCTV footage, which the former minister tried to destroy, was reportedly so graphic that members of the jury were driven to tears while watching it.

    Videos were also found on Bishimbayev’s mobile phone showing him humiliating and insulting his visibly bruised wife in the final hours before her death.

    During the trial, Bishimbayev admitted to beating his wife, but denied torturing or planning to murder her. He also claimed that some of her injuries were self-inflicted.

    Members of Kazakhstan diaspora and supporters hold banners while attending 'Justice for Saltanat' rally at the Main Square in Krakow, Poland on April 21, 2024. © Getty Images / NurPhoto / Contributor

    The murder sparked vocal public condemnation and helped build support for a recently passed law criminalizing domestic violence.

    Bishimbayev was ultimately convicted of “murder with special cruelty” and “torture,” but the prison term he received was less than the life sentence that his wife’s family had demanded. He reportedly gasped ‘why’ as the verdict was read by the judge.

    The politician’s cousin, Bakytzhan Baizhanov, was jailed for four years for helping him cover up the crime.

    Bishimbayev served as Kazakhstan’s economy minister from May-December 2016 under the country’s then-president Nursultan Nazarbayev, with whom he reportedly had a close relationship.

    He was previously sentenced to ten years in prison on corruption charges in 2018 before being pardoned by Nazarbayev after serving less than two years.

    Current Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev, who replaced Nazarbayev five years ago, has criminalized domestic violence; last month he enacted new laws which protect women and children.

  4. Site: Novus Motus Liturgicus
    4 days 12 hours ago
    Julian of Norwich was a medieval anchoress who wrote two extraordinary books about sixteen visions of Christ granted to her when she was thirty years old, in 1373. Though she was never beatified or even widely venerated, she is informally honored on May 13th, the approximate date when she was healed from the grave illness that prompted her mystical experiences. It is characteristic of Julian’s Robert Keimhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02834375772428838593noreply@blogger.com0
  5. Site: Zero Hedge
    4 days 12 hours ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    With "Exceptionalism" Like This, Who Needs Enemies?

    Authored by Peter Tchir via Academy Securities,

    Last weekend we suggested that “I Like My Exceptionalism to Be Exceptional” and highlighted data that was anything but exceptional. As the Citi Economic Surprise Index continues to fall, and CONsumer CONfidence showed anything but confidence, it seemed like a good idea to add to last weekend’s theme.

    More on “Exceptionalism” In Jobs

    Let’s start with “full-time” jobs. Full and part-time jobs come from the “Household” part of the NFP data. From my perspective, full-time jobs are more important than part-time jobs. There are certainly other views on the matter, but I prefer full-time jobs.

    I find a few things “interesting” on this chart (and by interesting, I mean less than exceptional).

    • Depending on the time horizon, we are below trend growth in full-time jobs (this time horizon captures that).

    • We had a strong post-COVID rebound, and by March 2022 we had created 832k more full-time jobs than we had prior to the pandemic. In the over 2 years since then we have added 1.4 million full-time jobs. That is 56k per month – hardly “exceptional.”

    • The high level was 134.8 million in June of 2023. That dropped to 132.9 million as of March 2024. So, in a 9-month window, where “exceptionalism” was the story, the Household Survey (which admittedly was nowhere near as strong as the Establishment Survey) showed a loss of almost 2 million full-time jobs! Last month’s Household report showed a big gain of almost 1 million full-time jobs, making the data look less bad. One can wonder (and I often do) why we even bother collecting the Household data if it is not taken seriously? Or maybe it should be?

    Maybe this is one reason why the “perception” of the economy isn’t as good as the data suggests? Because we pick and choose which data people should pay attention to, that is distorting the reality of the economy most people face.

    Now let’s look at the CES Net Birth-Death Model. You know the movie where they say, “you had me at hello?” Well, this “explainer” loses me at about the 2nd line. Maybe I should struggle through more carefully and try to build my own model. Many I am sure have, but I’m not sure if I could, and I definitely don’t care enough to do it. So, with that as a caveat, I often wonder about the impact this has on jobs and how accurate it really is. Maybe it is the awkward name which scares me (seriously, birth-death is the best name someone could come up with for this important component of NFP?).

    Since January 2021, the Establishment Survey says we have added 8.5 million jobs, of which 3 million were generated from the birth/death model. Seems reasonable that this “plug” or calculation is about 35%.

    In the past year (April 2023 to April 2024), 53% of the jobs created can be attributed to this model. 1.6 million of the 3.1 million jobs created (according to the Establishment Survey). Presumably, this data is correct, yet maybe this explains why there is a difference between the perception of the economy on many fronts, and what Wall Street touts as the “actual” data. Maybe some portion of these “estimated” jobs aren’t really jobs?

    I am not sure which data series is “correct“ or which “calculations” we should place more faith in. Yes, according to the BLS, the margin for error is materially higher in the Household Survey than the Establishment Survey, but both are quite high relative to the “precision” with which the data is presented.

    CONsumer CONfidence “Exceptionalism”

    I’m not sure in which direction this weekend’s report would have gone had it not been for Friday’s University of Michigan report. Given the ongoing glut of weaker than expected data, and a lot of feedback on last weekend’s piece, I probably would have done the same report. But CONsumer CONfidence solidified the direction we had to go. For those of you who read the T-Report regularly, you know that I am suspicious of the validity of the CONsumer CONfidence survey (hence the double CON). But apparently the devil can quote scripture for his or her own purposes, so why can’t I?

    Confidence plunged to 67 from 77 and had one of the biggest misses versus expectations of all time. Current conditions and future conditions didn’t matter – it was bad across the board. Inflation expectations (which the Fed pays attention to) seem to be “less anchored” than they were as the one- year inflation expectation jumped to 3.5% from 3.2% (the highest since November). The 10-year crept back to 3.1%. It had gotten to 3.2% in November, but other than that one print, this is tied as the highest longer-term inflation measure since this whole mess began!

    I promised myself I wouldn’t use the word stagflation, since that is nowhere close to my base case, but it is increasingly difficult to dismiss the possibility. So maybe I will just say Stag and Flation and leave it at that as a way to hint that it is creeping into my scenario analysis without quite getting there.

    But I digress, the one chart I want to show is the sentiment for Democrats.

    University of Michigan provides the data broken down by party affiliation. I have no idea how useful that is in reality, but it is curious. There is almost always a better perception by those whose party is in charge. Any time we dip below the black line on this chart, we should be worried because that is lower than confidence was when Trump was president. We are not there yet, but it has declined to the lowest level in a year. The decline was so rapid that it raised eyebrows. Prior declines could easily be linked to COVID or to the Fed starting to unwind easy money. This one is less easy to pinpoint, especially with the cacophony of “exceptionalism” that I’m taking more notice of than I usually would.

    For what it is worth, I believe the University of Michigan itself published something to the effect that they double checked the data and confirmed that it is statistically significant.

    Maybe I’m just the devil quoting scripture for my own purposes, but this report (which I often dismiss) is at least somewhat troubling and doesn’t do much for the “exceptionalism.”

    The Exceptional “Doctor Copper”

    We are seeing the price of many commodities increase. I will highlight “Doctor Copper” as it is one of the strongest charts and is normally associated with global economic growth.

    IF the rule of thumb holds, then an acceleration of copper should be indicative of increased global activity, which should benefit everyone. Let’s start with what we know:

    Copper (along with other raw materials) is rising in price again, potentially sparking another round of inflation fears as commodity price increases are likely to impact either prices or margins – neither particularly appealing for markets. Let’s think about what could be driving this.

    • A shift in what the world is consuming (maybe it is data) which is creating unusually large demand for specific resources. Seems plausible and would indicate some sectors should do well, but the rise in these commodities doesn’t herald a new age of global growth.

    • A shift in who is consuming. India has certainly been a massive beneficiary of the shift away from manufacturing in China. I’ve posited that any real risk of a commodity inflation bubble, like we saw in the mid-2000s, would be a result of India’s rise and economic empowerment there. Could this be yet another sign of India’s growth and their need for raw materials? l like that idea, as it supports my India growth story and commodity price risk views, but it is mere conjecture (wishful thinking, even) on my part at this stage. My argument is that even if this is a part of the move, it will benefit India and not the globe.

    • China finally rebounding? That is possible. It is difficult for any economy, especially one being propped up by the government, to do worse month after month. At some point there will be a rebound. Here, I would argue vehemently that a rise in commodity prices due to increased manufacturing in China is not good for many companies. It will inflate prices for components, and I’m increasingly convinced that our The Threat of Made By China 2025 understates the risk due to competition with Chinese brands.

    Rising commodity prices are unlikely to be helpful from an inflation standpoint. They may be contributing to the inflation expectations in the University of Michigan Survey. What remains to be seen is are they reflective of an improving global landscape, or are they more tied to a theme that is unlikely to benefit domestic companies as much as in the past? It will be very interesting to see how this plays out, and I’m definitely in “trying to figure it out” mode, rather than having high conviction in how it fits my theory.

    Tariff Exceptionalism

    It looks like we are headed down the path of increasing tariffs. Since 2018, I was largely in support of tariffs, and I probably need to remain supportive. Back in 2018, many argued that the tariffs were going to “Start a Trade War.” My main argument in favor had been that “we’ve been in a trade war for two decades, where only 1 side fired shots.” I did miss how quickly and efficiently China would move into Mexico (as one example) to mitigate the impacts of tariffs.

    But since this entire report is a backhanded “compliment” to “exceptionalism” I only want to point out the absurdity of solar panels.

    • At one time the U.S. was one of the largest manufacturers of solar panels.

    • The production of solar panels, for a variety of reasons, shifted to China. While cost was clearly one reason, I suspect that the “ungreen” nature of making solar panels contributed to that shift as many nations seemed to be in the “if we don’t see it, it didn’t happen” mode of thinking in terms of production that wasn’t green. China was quick to fill that market need.

    • At the same time, or in parallel, we have pushed and legislated for the need to use sustainable energy, such as solar. We’ve created subsidies and rules to increase demand for solar panels.

    • Now, as we need more and more energy (anything from data centers to EVs has been adding to demands on our electric grids), we will put tariffs on Chinese made solar panels. This increases the cost, potentially substantially, on something public policy is driving us towards.

    It really hurts my head that over the past few decades (there is no single administration to blame), we have failed to tie together industrial policy, economic policy, and environmental policy.

    Not that “free markets” were ever free, but maybe there is a lesson in here somewhere. Though, as much as I’d like that lesson to be that laissez-faire works, I suspect the lesson would be that more control works better, c’est la vie.

    In any case, the trade war is ramping up. While the fight is between China and the U.S. (with countries like Germany weighing in), the battleground will likely be in markets across the globe, and I remain afraid that we are far less prepared for that than the market is currently pricing in!

    Bottom Line

    Lower yields. I still like 4.3% to 4.5% on 10s and am pricing in two cuts this year. I am convinced that the economic data will show signs of further weakness. What I am less convinced of, and need to reevaluate, is whether inflation can come down, or whether we’ve bottomed and are heading higher? I don’t like the notion of stagflation as a concept, but it has popped up on my radar screen. So, while I still think yields will drop, I have less conviction. If we get a drop in CPI, which seems plausible, I would probably look to fade any bond market rally on that. 

    What do lower yields mean for stocks? I think we are near the end of the lower yields/Fed Put rally that has helped stocks creep higher on anemic volumes. Last week we argued that the market might “gap” from “no landing” to some form of “bumpy landing” and I think that is in the midst of occurring, which won’t support risk assets. I still prefer China and think India as an investment will continue to outperform (I think I’ve been more focused on China as it fed my “contrarianism” more than India).

    Credit. Boring. Still prefer to reduce exposure to the riskiest credits but think credit will remain “boring” relative to rates or stocks.

    Hope you all had a truly exceptional Happy Mother’s Day and enjoyed time with your family!

    Now, we can get back to worrying about how “exceptional” or not the economy is!

    Tyler Durden Mon, 05/13/2024 - 14:00
  6. Site: Zero Hedge
    4 days 13 hours ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    At Least 360,000 Flee Rafah As Israel Touts 'Precision Operation' Against Biden Criticism

    An estimated 360,000 Gazans have fled the southern city of Rafah as the Israel Defense Forces concentrate a ground operation on the eastern half of the city, the main UN aid agency UNRWA says. This figure is likely to grow higher by the day as IDF tanks and ground units press forward.

    The official Palestinian death toll, issued by the Hamas-run Health Ministry, has surpassed 35,000 - tallied at 35,091 Gazans killed and other 78,827 wounded since Oct.7. The last 24 hours of fighting has seen 57 killed and 82 injured, according to the figures.

    Anadolu Agency

    Gaza's health system is "hours away" from collapse, the health ministry has told international aid groups and news outlets, due primarily to fuel shipments being not getting into the Strip amid fighting. Hospitals and clinics rely on generators to operate.

    "We are just hours away from the collapse of the health system in the Gaza Strip due to the lack of the necessary fuel to operate generators in hospitals, ambulances, and (for vehicles to) transport staff," the Gaza health ministry said.

    Israel has said that over the weekend it had transferred a large quantity of fuel into the Strip in order to ease the humanitarian crisis.

    Ongoing pressure to minimize civilian death from the Biden administration has resulted in the Israeli side claiming it is engaged in a 'limited' ground offensive. So far the IDF appears to have cut Rafah in half and is focused on actions in the east. Specific sectors of the cities have been ordered to be evacuated, with tens of thousands of flyers having been dropped from aircraft.

    In a Sunday night phone call Defense Minister Yoav Gallant sought to defend the operation, telling US Secretary of State Antony Blinken that Israel is undertaking a 'precise operation'.

    The readout says Gallant conveyed to the US top diplomat "developments in Gaza, including IDF operations across the Strip in the face of terror hotspots, and the precise operation in the Rafah area against remaining Hamas battalions, while securing the crossing."

    "The minister expressed his appreciation to Secretary Blinken for the ongoing support provided by the US administration for Israel’s security," the readout added.

    Israel “Likely” Used U.S-Supplied Weapons in Violation of International Law. That’s OK, Though, State Department Says https://t.co/SMFRB593zC by @ShawnMusgrave, @prem_thakker https://t.co/SMFRB593zC

    — The Intercept (@theintercept) May 10, 2024

    Blinken reportedly again conveyed the US stance which stands against a major operation in Rafah. The White House has warned it could withhold future offensive weapons from Israel, but so far it seems a mere one shipment has been confirmed as on pause.

    Meanwhile major IDF operations have restarted in the north too, with Reuters describing: Israeli forces pushed deep into the ruins of Gaza's northern edge to recapture an area where they had claimed to have defeated Hamas months ago, while at the opposite end of the enclave tanks and troops pushed across a highway into Rafah. Hundreds of thousands of Palestinians have again taken flight.

    * * *

    Israel settlers have continued to attack humanitarian aid shipments entering the Strip from Israel...

    Israeli right wing activists blocked aid trucks which were on their way to Gaza today at the Tarqumiya crossing in the West Bank pic.twitter.com/fUd3ywuDbr

    — Barak Ravid (@BarakRavid) May 13, 2024
    Tyler Durden Mon, 05/13/2024 - 13:45
  7. Site: LifeNews
    4 days 13 hours ago
    Author: Charlotte Lozier Institute

    A new peer-reviewed article highlights major flaws in the data used by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to remove medical safeguards and in-person administering of abortion drugs. These flaws illustrate the ongoing problem of lack of quality abortion reporting data in the U.S. as well as in the United Kingdom.

    In April 2021, the FDA removed mifepristone’s in-person requirements, temporarily allowing remote access to abortion drugs during the COVID-19 pandemic, later making these changes permanent in December 2021. The FDA identified four studies used to justify this decision.  The article’s authors highlight multiple flaws and limitations of the U.S. and U.K. data, including:

    • The FDA claimed there were only a small number of reported adverse events from abortion drugs in 2020. However, the FDA removed the requirement for abortion drug prescribers to report non-lethal complications in 2016
    • Three of the studies relied on by the FDA, in general, did not replicate the conditions of use the FDA approved. In any case, they showed considerable rates of failures requiring surgery, as well as many women lost to follow-up with unknown outcomes.  
    • The fourth study, by Texas pro-abortion researcher Abigail Aiken which reported 99.2% effectiveness in “telemedicine” abortions, relied on a U.K. reporting system that was frequently unaware of abortion drug complications.   
    • When considering higher quality data which more accurately identifies abortion drug complications in the U.K., there were at least five to ten times as many complications as initially reported – and likely many more.  

    The study notes that women risk serious complications by taking abortion drugs without in-person medical exams. These include (but are not limited to):

    • An inability to perform ultrasounds to screen for complications, such as ectopic pregnancy, which cannot be treated by abortion drugs 
    • An underestimation of the baby’s gestational age, which will lead to more failed-abortion complications 
    • An inability to screen pregnant women or girls for coercion and abuse by a partner, family member, or human trafficker 

    Follow LifeNews.com on Instagram for pro-life pictures and videos.

    Due to these safety concerns, even leading pro-abortion groups in the U.K., including the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health and the National Network of Designated Healthcare Professionals for Children, opposed mail-order abortion drugs, and the U.K. government subsequently sought to ban them. But that was later overruled by a parliamentary vote.

    Dr. Calum Miller, research fellow at the University of Oxford, and Dr. Ingrid Skop, a board-certified OB-GYN who serves as vice president and director of medical affairs at Charlotte Lozier Institute, co-authors of the article, added:

    “The FDA must follow the science by considering the highest quality studies examining the safety of abortion drugs, and they must follow the laws regulating their actions. They have done neither in their approval and subsequent loosening of safeguards surrounding mifepristone and misoprostol abortions. The FDA must protect the health and safety of women and girls by reinstating critical safeguards and be held accountable to the American people.”

    The FDA is currently facing intense scrutiny in the FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine Supreme Court case, a landmark case in which a group of doctors challenged the FDA’s reckless approval of mail-order abortion drugs. A decision is expected in June.

    The post New Study Reveals FDA Relied on Cherrypicked Data to Approve Dangerous Mail-Order Abortion Drugs appeared first on LifeNews.com.

  8. Site: Zero Hedge
    4 days 13 hours ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    Biden Calls Illegals Crossing The Border "Hispanic Voters"

    Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity.news,

    In a telling slip of the tongue earlier this week, Joe Biden referred to the unprecedented rise in illegal immigrants entering the US as an “influx” of “Hispanic voters.”

    During an interview with a Spanish radio show, Biden was talking about the border crisis, and stated “It’s even a bigger influx now in terms of Hispanic voters, or Hispanic – Hispanic citizens, who want to become citizens.”

    Listen:

    In a telling slip of the tongue earlier this week, Joe Biden referred to the unprecedented rise in illegal immigrants entering the US as an "influx" of "Hispanic voters." Full report here: https://t.co/FYpTpE1j1m pic.twitter.com/ybcjVggVih

    — m o d e r n i t y (@ModernityNews) May 11, 2024

    ILLEGAL ALIENS! Looks like Dementia Joe had a Freudian slip. He told the truth. Extremely rare for him.

    — Joe Blow (@srv2000) May 10, 2024

    This was always the plan.

    — RingoTyler (@PKLakeDog21) May 10, 2024

    Biden also ludicrously compared mass illegal immigration at the border to Irish people coming to America in the 1840s.

    He said it’s “a little bit like back in the 1840s and the great exodus of Ireland, because of the famine and the way Irish Catholics were treated. They said no, no, we don’t need any more of those folks. There was a large influx.” 

    Except the Irish weren't involved in human trafficking, drug smuggling, and corruption.

    — Tim Shorts (@TimShortsBBQ) May 10, 2024

    The difference is the Irish came her LEGALLY!

    — ML (@mlvercle) May 10, 2024

    “The Hispanic community is part of the future of America,” Biden further stated, adding “Twenty-eight out of every 100 students in school speak Spanish, the idea that you’re gonna ignore that? That’s our future.”

    He then repeated the claim that the economy is “good” because of mass illegal immigration, and suggested anyone who disagrees is xenophobic.

    “One of the reasons that we’re growing so much is we have a significant influx of immigrants coming into our country, only reason our economy’s so good. We’re not a xenophobic nation. Other nations are, we’re not, that’s why our economy is the best in the world,” he claimed.

    As we highlighted yesterday, amid the unprecedented explosion in illegals entering the US, there has been a six thousand plus percent increase in Chinese nationals being encountered at the border, with over 1000 being apprehended in just the past week.

    *  *  *

    Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.

    Tyler Durden Mon, 05/13/2024 - 13:25
  9. Site: LifeNews
    4 days 13 hours ago
    Author: Steven Ertelt

    While there are millions of moms deserving of praise, since it is Mother’s Day, I’d like to write about my favorite one, mine. Like all children, I know my mom isn’t perfect, but like most children, if you asked me to describe my mom’s flaws, I couldn’t think of one.

    After marrying my dad, my mom gave up a promising career as dean of students at a local community college to be a fulltime mom. My sister Marita’s birth was difficult, and doctors had to work hard to save both my sister’s life and my mom’s. After both their conditions stabilized, my dad introduced my sister to my mom saying, “We have been blessed with an angel.”

    Marita has a rare genetic disorder that causes multiple physical and intellectual disabilities. Because her condition is genetic, shortly after she was born a doctor advised my parents to pursue pre-natal testing for future children. Any “problems” he said, would just be “taken care of.” My parents — who believe all life is sacred from the moment of fertilization and were completely in love with their new baby girl — found a new doctor.

    Still, my parents proceeded with caution. My mom’s sudden platelet drop during labor almost ended her life, and the condition left my parents wondering if more biological children were part of God’s plan for their future. But, after briefly pursuing adoption, my mom’s health returned, and she soon became pregnant with my brother.

    Follow LifeNews.com on Instagram for pro-life pictures and videos.

    Once again, the pregnancy proved challenging, and while doctors were able to ensure a safe labor and delivery using steroids, after my brother’s birth, they advised my parents that it would be risky for my mom to become pregnant again.

    So, my parents used natural family planning (NFP) to avoid pregnancy, but God had other plans. After four years when, thankfully, her health improved, my mom unexpectedly learned she was pregnant with me. As she recounts the story, she told my dad they were having another baby and asked, “Do you think I’ll be okay?” He responded, “Yes. All we have to do is trust.” Despite her history of pregnancy complications and fears for her health, my mom knew that killing her unborn baby — me — wasn’t the answer. Today, my husband, children, and I are beyond grateful for her courage.

    My mom’s commitment to caring for unborn life was nothing short of heroic, but her respect for the dignity of every person didn’t start with a positive pregnancy test, and it didn’t end in the delivery room.

    Every day of her life she has modeled upholding the dignity of others. Whether serving herself last at dinner, caring for my sister, washing and ironing clothes at all hours of the night, or taking a “break” by volunteering at the pregnancy resource center — my mom’s life has always revolved around those she loves and those who are in need. Perhaps the most beautiful thing about my mom is that as she lives a life of total sacrifice for others, she does so with joy.

    My mom’s witness challenges the narrative that women need abortion to be happy, to preserve their health, and to prevent suffering. Her life presents the alternative path of pouring yourself out completely for others and finding your life filled in return. She could have chosen her career, her health, or eugenics, but my mom chose something different, something better. Love.

    While my mom’s story is unique, her self-sacrificial love for her children, which reflects the sacrificial love Christ has for each of us, is the hallmark of motherhood. This Mother’s Day, let’s give thanks to every mom for the sacrifices she has made, both large and small.

    To those moms who have lost a child though abortion, there is forgiveness, hope, and healing.

    To all those who have lost a child through miscarriage or death, and to those hoping to one day be a mom, you are in my prayers.

    And to those moms who are pregnant and considering an abortion, the future may look frightening, but there are people ready and willing to help. Be like my mom. Choose love! Choose life!

    LifeNews Note: Mary Szoch is the Director of the Center for Human Dignity at Family Research Council. This column originally appeared at Washington Stand.

    The post Be Grateful for Moms Like Mine Who Chose Life appeared first on LifeNews.com.

  10. Site: Zero Hedge
    4 days 13 hours ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    Melinda Gates Abruptly Quits Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

    Melinda Gates revealed on X that she is resigning as co-chair of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, with her final day being June 7.

    "After careful thought and reflection, I have decided to resign from my role as co-chair of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

    My last day of work at the foundation will be June 7th."

    She plans to focus on her own philanthropic efforts, supported by a $12.5 billion grant.

    Gates said:

    She continued:

    Gates explained more about her new chapter in life: 

    Let's examine the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in depth.

    Here, data from the research firm Sayari shows its complexity. 

    Source: Sayari

    Back to Bill and Melinda, they divorced in 2021 after a 27-year marriage

    Melinda ends her goodbye letter by saying she'll explain more about her new philanthropic efforts at a later date. 

    Why the sudden split, Melinda? 

    Microsoft Co-Founder Bill Gates and Melinda Gates are splitting up

    Could this split have anything to do with Bill’s relationship with Epstein? https://t.co/DRNXO6wtis

    — JC Oviedo (@JCOviedo6) May 3, 2021

    Hmm. 

    Tyler Durden Mon, 05/13/2024 - 13:05
  11. Site: AsiaNews.it
    4 days 13 hours ago
    Zhang Zhan, 40, was a leading human rights advocate in Shanghai. The Christian woman was supposed to be freed today after four years in prison, but her fate remains unknown while her family has been forced into silence. Activist groups following her case fear that, as in other cases, she might be detained under a different form.
  12. Site: The Remnant Newspaper - Remnant Articles
    4 days 14 hours ago
    Author: robert.t.morrison@gmail.com (Robert Morrison | Remnant Columnist)
    “For you know, venerable brothers, that these bitter enemies of the Christian name, are carried wretchedly along by some blind momentum of their mad impiety; they go so far in their rash imagining as to teach without blushing, openly and publicly, daring and unheard-of doctrines, thereby uttering blasphemies against God. They teach that the most holy mysteries of our religion are fictions of human invention, and that the teaching of the Catholic Church is opposed to the good and the prerogatives of human society.” (Blessed Pope Pius IX, Qui Pluribus)
  13. Site: Catholic Conclave
    4 days 14 hours ago
    The Rupnik scandal, a reality of manipulation that directly affects the Pope's governance.It is a very particular case, in Bergoglio's pontificate, the abuse scandal for which soon the former Jesuit - but still a priest - Marko Rupnik should be brought before a canonical tribunal. A particular case because it is not a bishop or a priest who committed his crimes in a distant country who knows Catholic Conclavehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06227218883606585321noreply@blogger.com0
  14. Site: Zero Hedge
    4 days 14 hours ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    Why The Establishment Fears A Trump-Led Fed

    Via SchiffGold.com,

    While in office, Trump blamed the Fed for tightening monetary policy.

    Now members of Trump’s team allegedly plan to give a re-elected Trump more power over the Fed, igniting panic from mainstream economists about a politicized Fed.

    Our guest commentator explains why the real risk, from the establishment’s perspective, is not that Trump will turn the Fed into a political organization but that he will expose that it already is one.

    The following article was originally published by the Mises Institute. The opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect those of Peter Schiff or SchiffGold.

    Discourse about the Federal Reserve is frequently full of myths, dishonest framing, and outright lies. Listen to a press conference by Chairman Jerome Powell or read an article from a major outlet’s lead Fed correspondent and you’re bound to hear at least a few. For instance, it’s common for the financial press to characterize the Fed’s current conundrum as “walking a tightrope.”

    It’s said that the Fed is working to guide the economy along without tipping it over into either high inflation on one side or a recession on the other.

    The last couple years, we’re told, saw the economy wobble too far toward the inflation side, with the Fed now attempting to pull the economy back to the thin line of stability without tipping over too far and plunging into a recession.

    But anybody who actually understands what causes recessions can tell that this framing is, at best, incredibly misleading. The Fed doesn’t prevent recessions, it directly causes them.

    These days the tightrope analogy contributes to the myth that, while difficult, a recession is possible to avoid. It isn’t. All the Fed can do is delay and amplify the painful correction that earlier monetary policy made inevitable.

    Another myth that has been getting more attention in past weeks is that the Fed as an organization is separate from, above, or independent from politics.

    The attention follows a Wall Street Journal report alleging that members of former president Donald Trump’s team are drawing up plans to give the president more power over the Fed should Trump win the election this November. Reporters cite an internal ten-page document that argues the president should be consulted on interest-rate decisions and have the authority to fire Fed chairs before their term is up. These plans sparked panic about a politicized Fed and provoked responses from several concerned economists.

    It is absurd that this needs to be spelled out, but the Fed is already a political organization. It was established by an act of Congress in 1913. Two decades later, Congress consolidated much of the Fed’s power in Washington, DC, and set up the position of chairman, who is appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate. It also created a single committee—most of which is also appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate—to direct open market operations for the entire country. Then in 1977, Congress passed another bill requiring the Fed to pursue specific policy goals.

    So, a bunch of politicians created an organization and consolidated its power in Washington, DC, where a committee of government officials appointed and confirmed by politicians directs monetary policy for the entire country according to policy goals defined earlier by other politicians. And we’re supposed to consider this organization to be nonpolitical.

    Moreover, the idea that the changes Trump’s team might be considering would represent a categorical change to the structure of the Federal Reserve is crazy. Fed chairs already consult with current presidential administrations through the Treasury Secretary. It’s not as if the Fed is isolated from the ambitions of the executive branch.

    The real risk, from the establishment’s perspective, is not that Trump will turn the Fed into a political organization but that he will expose the fact that it already is one.

    From the outset, the Federal Reserve System has represented the politicization of money and banking in the United States. It allows the government to finance its preferred programs with newly printed money and to manipulate the entire structure of the economy with centrally planned interest rates. This is great for politicians, government bureaucrats, and politically connected businesses that get the new money early. But it traps the rest of us in a recurring nightmare of unnecessary economy-wide booms and busts along with devastating, culture-destroying permanent price inflation.

    The illusion of an independent, nonpolitical Fed is critical to keep the scam going.

    Tyler Durden Mon, 05/13/2024 - 12:45
  15. Site: RT - News
    4 days 14 hours ago
    Author: RT

    A bipartisan group of MPs had earlier suggested creating a NATO-controlled area along the border with the EU

    Berlin opposes any initiatives aimed at establishing a no-fly zone over any part of Ukrainian territory that would be controlled by NATO forces, German government spokesman Steffen Hebestreit told a press conference on Monday. A group of MPs had earlier raised the idea.

    On Saturday, lawmakers from the opposition and the three-party ruling coalition said they supported targeting Russian missiles and drones over Ukraine by using defenses based in Poland and Romania. They also argued in favor of creating a 70-km-wide safe zone along the Ukraine-EU border.

    When asked what the federal government thinks of the idea, Hebestreit replied that Chancellor Olaf Scholz’s cabinet had opposed it in the past and would do so now. “We felt that it would cross the line into [NATO’s] direct participation” in the conflict between Kiev and Moscow, he said, referring to a similar stance taken by Berlin in November 2022.

    Read more  Rolf Mutzenich. Top German MP warns against Ukraine no-fly zone

    “The same applies to the considerations expressed in various ways [now],” the spokesman stated. According to Hebestreit, Kiev’s Western backers should focus on supplying it with air defense systems like the US-made Patriot, which Berlin has recently vowed to send to Ukraine. Germany had already “invested massively in Ukraine’s air defense,” the official said, pointing to the German-made IRIS-T air defense systems and Gepard self-propelled anti-aircraft guns that his nation also provided to Kiev.

    Earlier, the lawmakers’ initiative was also criticized by an influential MP. Using NATO air defenses against Russian targets would be “playing with fire,” warned Rolf Mutzenich, who chairs Chancellor Olaf Scholz’s Social Democratic Party (SPD) parliamentary group in the Bundestag. According to him, the involvement of the German Armed Forces in the defense of Ukrainian airspace would “immediately turn us into a warring party” and would require an approval by the Bundestag.

    The developments come amid reports suggesting that Kiev’s forces are increasingly struggling to ward off Russian missile strikes. According to data cited by the Wall Street Journal on Monday, Ukraine intercepted only about 46% of Russian missiles in the past six months, compared to 73% in a previous comparable period. In April, that figure dropped to 30%.

  16. Site: LifeNews
    4 days 14 hours ago
    Author: Kristan Hawkins

    As someone whose family once proudly embraced the Democratic Party, I mourn the decision by three Democratic presidents to make the loss of life made into a business by unleashing the chemical abortion pill on the U.S. market. Chemical abortion pills, which end hundreds of thousands of lives annually, represent the dark legacy of Presidents Bill ClintonBarack Obama, and now Joe Biden. Their administrations’ actions allowed the pills to be sold in ways known to harm women and girls as a financial gift for a powerful interest group: the abortion industry.

    The business of chemical abortion pills in America is a federal issue. Reversing the neglect and abuse of power by federal agencies will demand leadership and key appointments to undo Democrats‘ gift to the abortion industry.

    President Clinton manipulated the levers of federal power, working behind the scenes to bring the drug to the U.S. market in 2000 with assurances that protecting women’s safety would be a priority. To fast-track this means of abortion, the FDA deemed pregnancy an illness and death by abortion pills a treatment.

    Health and safety standards (known as REMS—risk evaluation, and mitigation strategies) put in place to protect mothers in 2000 came under attack during Barack Obama’s tenure. Obama’s head of the FDA, Dr. Robert Califf, supported efforts to make it easier to sell the life-ending pills. President Joe Biden followed in those footsteps, appointing a legal attack dog against pro-life groups and policies—former California Attorney General Xavier Becerra—to head the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. He also brought Califf back to the FDA for an encore performance.

    SUPPORT LIFENEWS! If you want to help fight abortion, please donate to LifeNews.com!

    The FDA knows these pills can kill women. But under the last three Democratic administrations, that fact became politically irrelevant in the push for policies that allow for a quick online sale.

    For example, chemical abortion pills will not end an ectopic pregnancy, which is when a human in embryonic form implants outside of the womb. While the combination of the two pills sold for abortions in the U.S. will cause bleeding, leading a woman to believe her pregnancy has ended, in fact, the life-threatening ectopic pregnancy continues. Requiring that pregnant women have an ultrasound to determine the location and length of pregnancy would save lives, but that requirement is missing from the REMS issued by Biden’s FDA.

    Also missing is any requirement for blood testing and treatment of Rh-negative status. About 15 percent of the population is Rh-negative, which means that a mixing of blood between mother and child during birth, miscarriage, or abortion can lead to antibodies forming in the mother that can attack future pregnancies, effectively leading to infertility without an injection of Rh immune globulin. But abortionists and illegal chemical abortion pill distributors don’t provide that treatment, since there’s no blood tests in the world of online distribution.

    And then there is the reality that anonymous online distribution makes chemical abortion pills the dream drug for abusers and sex traffickers, who have used them against mothers without their knowledge or consent.

    The risks of chemical abortion pills—injury, infertility, empowered abusers, and death—also include environmental harm. When the pills were rushed onto the U.S. market, Clinton’s FDA accepted an environmental assessment report from the pro-abortion Population Council that basically said littering was the only potential problem.

    But today, chemically tainted blood, placenta tissue, and human remains from more than 6 in 10 abortions are flushed into America’s waterways. That is why Students for Life of America has filed citizen petitions with the FDA to stop abortion pollution and led a coalition effort of more than 40 organizations to demand that the Environmental Protection Agency track the chemicals released by chemical abortion pills.

    Donald Trump has said he will soon announce his position on chemical abortion pills. To address Democrats’ abuse of federal power, Trump should take these steps in a second term:

    1. Make key appointments from the vice presidency to Health & Human Services, the FDA, and the Department of Justice to reverse and review the weaponization of policy.
    2. Demand that the Environmental Protection Agency track the forever chemicals of chemical abortion that have been flushed into America’s waterways.
    3. Require the FDA to do clean water and endangered species testing, which have been ignored every time the chemical abortion REMS have been changed.
    4. Champion health and safety standards for in-person care to address known harms to women and add environmental protections, like common-sense red bag medical waste disposal requirements to prevent tainting waterways.
    5. Instruct the Drug Administration Agency and the Federal Trade Commission to address the illegal, online abortion pill vendors operating in the U.S. in violation of state laws.
    6. End the Justice Department’s attacks against states and pro-life individuals, prioritized in the Biden administration, including using pro-life laws on the books, such as the Comstock Act.
    7. Cut taxpayer funding to schools distributing the deadly drugs as well as abortion vendors profiting from their reckless distribution.

    Confronting perhaps the most politically protected business in America, shielded from prosecution, from scrutiny, environmental oversight, and legal compliance, will require a champion who cares more about women, girls, and the preborn than the expedited sale of a deadly two-drug cocktail. But the abuse of federal power to push abortion pills must come to an end.

    LifeNews Note: Kristan Hawkins is president of Students for Life of America and Students for Life Action, with more than 1,400 groups on middle and high school, college and university, medical and law school campuses in all 50 states. Follow her @KristanHawkins or subscribe to her podcast, Explicitly Pro-Life.

    The post By Pushing Dangerous Abortion Pills, Democrats Have Failed Women For Decades appeared first on LifeNews.com.

  17. Site: LifeNews
    4 days 14 hours ago
    Author: S.A. McCarthy

    The British government is preparing to reject a global health treaty that critics warn gives power to “a new world order.” According to The Telegraph, the U.K. is opposed to signing the World Health Organization (WHO) global pandemic treaty, insisting the accord would undermine the U.K.’s sovereignty.

    The U.K. reportedly refuses to agree to any treaty which would not allow the nation to put its own interests first. In its present form, which is the ninth and final draft, the WHO treaty would require wealthier Western nations such as the U.S. and the U.K. to surrender 20% of their “pandemic-related health products” — including medicines, vaccines, and protective equipment — to be given to nations the WHO deems less developed. The terms of the treaty would grant the WHO 10% of those products for free and the other 10% “at affordable prices.” A spokesperson for Britain’s Department of Health and Social Care stated, “We will only support the adoption of the accord and accept it on behalf of the UK, if it is firmly in the UK national interest and respects national sovereignty.”

    The pandemic treaty was introduced in May 2021 in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, purportedly as a means of ensuring a united international global response to future pandemics. However, critics across the globe, including in the U.S., are urging nations to reject the accord, warning that it effectively grants the bureaucratic WHO unprecedented control over sovereign nations and their health care systems.

    Appearing on “Washington Watch” on Thursday night, Senator Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) cautioned against the “dangers of global governance” and “a new world order.” He explained that the WHO “engineered” the global response to COVID-19 but ultimately “gave cover” to China, where the virus originated. “I think it probably was manmade, probably from a lab in Wuhan,” Johnson said. “But again, there’s corruption. The Chinese exert way too much influence on the World Health Organization. Why would we want China’s influence dictating American actions or other nations’ actions as well?”

    SUPPORT LIFENEWS! If you want to help fight abortion, please donate to LifeNews.com!

    Johnson and his fellow Senate Republicans issued a letter last week to President Joe Biden, demanding he withdraw the U.S. from WHO pandemic treaty negotiations. Declaring the terms of the treaty “unacceptable,” the letter states, “Some of the over 300 proposals for amendments made by member states would substantially increase the WHO’s health emergency powers and constitute intolerable infringements upon U.S. sovereignty.” The letter also called on the U.S. to hold the WHO accountable for its “total” and “predictable” “failure” to respond adequately to COVID-19, a failure which the letter argues “did lasting harm to our country.”

    The letter concludes noting that any treaty must be approved by the Senate and that Biden is expected to “submit any pandemic related agreement to the Senate for its advice and consent.” On “Washington Watch,” Johnson explained, “The presidents are abusing their authority in terms of entering these agreements, calling them executive agreements when they clearly fall into the guidelines of what treaties should be.” He added that Americans should “understand what our president is getting America involved in.”

    Johnson and his Senate compatriots aren’t the only ones calling on Biden to withdraw from negotiations. Last week, 22 state attorneys general also sent a letter to the president, warning that the pandemic treaty would give the WHO “unprecedented and unconstitutional powers over the United States and her people” and cautioning against “relinquish[ing] more power to unelected and unaccountable institutions.” Referring to the pandemic treaty as “highly problematic,” the attorneys general wrote:

    “To varying degrees, these measures would threaten national sovereignty, undermine states’ authority, and imperil constitutionally guaranteed freedoms. Ultimately, the goal of these instruments isn’t to protect public health. It’s to cede authority to the WHO — specifically its Director-General — to restrict our citizens’ rights to freedom of speech, privacy, movement (especially travel across borders) and informed consent.”

    They further noted that the negotiations Biden has involved the U.S. in “would transform the WHO from an advisory, charitable organization into the world’s governor of public health” and “inappropriately cede American sovereignty to the WHO.” Additionally, they pointed out that the federal government does not have the constitutional authority to “delegate public health decisions to an international body,” observing that “responsibility for public health policy” is vested in the states, not in the federal government.

    Finally, the attorneys general warned that the WHO’s proposals “would lay the groundwork for a global surveillance infrastructure, ostensibly in the interest of public health, but with the inherent opportunity for control (as with Communist China’s ‘social credit system’).” They added, “The current draft instructs signatories to ‘cooperate, in accordance with national law, in preventing misinformation and disinformation.’ This is particularly dangerous given that your administration pressured and encouraged social-media companies to suppress free speech during COVID-19.”

    Nations are expected to either accept or reject the terms of the pandemic treaty at the WHO’s World Health Assembly in Geneva, Switzerland, later this month.

    LifeNews Note: S.A. McCarthy serves as a news writer at The Washington Stand.

    The post U.K. Rejects Radical WHO Pandemic Treaty That Could Undermine National Sovereignty appeared first on LifeNews.com.

  18. Site: RT - News
    4 days 14 hours ago
    Author: RT

    Democrats are polling normally in the Senate races, suggesting voters may see Biden himself as the problem

    Former US President Donald Trump would beat the incumbent Joe Biden in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada and Pennsylvania if the November election were held today, according to the latest poll by the New York Times and Siena College.

    The polls showed Trump leading by seven percentage points in Arizona and Michigan, ten in Georgia, three in Pennsylvania and a whopping twelve in Nevada. 

    The poll is “littered with bad news for Biden, whether it’s on abortion, the economy, Gaza, and so on,” said the New York Times’ chief political analyst, Nate Cohn. “Trump’s strength is largely thanks to gains among young, black and Hispanic voters,” he added.

    Muslim or Arab Americans have also swung around to favor Trump in “huge defections” from the Democrats, mainly driven by Biden’s support for Israel’s offensive against Gaza. Voters who are Muslim or of Middle Eastern/North African (MENA) origin now favor Trump 57% - 25% with 18% undecided, the poll showed; in 2020 56% favored Biden and only 35% backed the then-president. 

    “When we asked Arab or Muslim voters who didn’t back Mr. Biden about their most important issue in the race, around 70 percent cited foreign policy or the war in Gaza,” the Times noted.

    Read more US President Joe Biden listens to a question from reporters before boarding a limousine upon arrival at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, in SeaTac, Washington, on May 10, 2024. Biden ‘doing it all wrong’ – ex-Clinton adviser

    Almost 4,100 registered voters were surveyed between April 28 and May 9. According to Cohn, the answers given by voters who used to back Biden but are now turning to Trump were “typical: economy, wars, immigration” and “Biden skepticism.”

    The lone outlier was Wisconsin, scheduled to host the Republican convention in July, where Biden appeared to be two points ahead. 

    Suggesting that the problem was with Biden himself and not the party, the poll showed Democrats leading the Senate races in Arizona, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. The “ticket-splitting” was the most pronounced in Nevada, where many likely Trump voters said they backed Senator Jacky Rosen, the incumbent Democrat, over a hypothetical Republican challenger. The GOP is scheduled to pick its Senate candidate there in a June primary. 

    The New York Times called this good news for Biden, suggesting that “these voters haven’t yet abandoned Democrats in full, and they might still be available to return to his side.”

    Biden won all six swing states in the 2020 election, which Trump has disputed as irregular. The two are now set for a rematch in November, once their nominations are formally confirmed at the party conventions this summer.

  19. Site: RT - News
    4 days 14 hours ago
    Author: RT

    Democrats are polling normally in the Senate races, suggesting voters may see Biden himself as the problem

    Former US President Donald Trump would beat the incumbent Joe Biden in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada and Pennsylvania if the November election were held today, according to the latest poll by the New York Times and Siena College.

    The polls showed Trump leading by seven percentage points in Arizona and Michigan, ten in Georgia, three in Pennsylvania and a whopping twelve in Nevada. 

    The poll is “littered with bad news for Biden, whether it’s on abortion, the economy, Gaza, and so on,” said the New York Times’ chief political analyst, Nate Cohn. “Trump’s strength is largely thanks to gains among young, black and Hispanic voters,” he added.

    Muslim or Arab Americans have also swung around to favor Trump in “huge defections” from the Democrats, mainly driven by Biden’s support for Israel’s offensive against Gaza. Voters who are Muslim or of Middle Eastern/North African (MENA) origin now favor Trump 57% - 25% with 18% undecided, the poll showed; in 2020 56% favored Biden and only 35% backed the then-president. 

    “When we asked Arab or Muslim voters who didn’t back Mr. Biden about their most important issue in the race, around 70 percent cited foreign policy or the war in Gaza,” the Times noted.

    Read more US President Joe Biden listens to a question from reporters before boarding a limousine upon arrival at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, in SeaTac, Washington, on May 10, 2024. Biden ‘doing it all wrong’ – ex-Clinton adviser

    Almost 4,100 registered voters were surveyed between April 28 and May 9. According to Cohn, the answers given by voters who used to back Biden but are now turning to Trump were “typical: economy, wars, immigration” and “Biden skepticism.”

    The lone outlier was Wisconsin, scheduled to host the Republican convention in July, where Biden appeared to be two points ahead. 

    Suggesting that the problem was with Biden himself and not the party, the poll showed Democrats leading the Senate races in Arizona, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. The “ticket-splitting” was the most pronounced in Nevada, where many likely Trump voters said they backed Senator Jacky Rosen, the incumbent Democrat, over a hypothetical Republican challenger. The GOP is scheduled to pick its Senate candidate there in a June primary. 

    The New York Times called this good news for Biden, suggesting that “these voters haven’t yet abandoned Democrats in full, and they might still be available to return to his side.”

    Biden won all six swing states in the 2020 election, which Trump has disputed as irregular. The two are now set for a rematch in November, once their nominations are formally confirmed at the party conventions this summer.

  20. Site: RT - News
    4 days 14 hours ago
    Author: RT

    After granting amnesty to hundreds of separatists, Spain’s socialists won regional elections in Catalonia

    Pro-independence parties in Catalonia have lost their parliamentary majority, with the socialist allies of Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez emerging as the region’s largest party. 

    The Catalan Socialist Party (PSC), a sister party of Sanchez’ Spanish Socialist Workers’ Party, won 42 out of 135 seats in regional elections on Sunday. Although the party fell short of the 68 seats needed for an absolute majority, the result represents a significant increase from the 31 seats it won in 2021 and makes the PSC the largest single party in the region.

    Despite the separatist Together for Catalonia (Junts) gaining four seats to finish in second with 35, losses for other pro-independence parties meant that the separatist movement no longer enjoys a parliamentary majority. The Republican Left of Catalonia, a pro-independence party that has led the region’s government since 2021, lost 13 seats to finish with 20, the most significant fall in support for any party contesting the election.

    Read more A banner saying 'PSOE sells Spain' is seen among protesters during a demonstration called by Spanish civic organizations that opposesanner the amnesty for Catalan independentists presented by the PSOE to ensure the inauguration of Pedro Sánchez as president of of the government of Spain. Thousands rally against Catalan amnesty law

    Sanchez’ conciliatory position toward the separatists is widely seen as having defanged the pro-independence movement. The most controversial of his policies is an amnesty law passed last year, which once in effect will pardon hundreds of separatist leaders involved in organizing an independence referendum in 2017. The passage of the law outraged Spain’s right-wing parties and triggered massive protests in Madrid.

    Speaking after votes were counted on Sunday evening, PSC leader Salvador Illa said that his party’s victory was the result of “the policies implemented by the Spanish government and its prime minister, Pedro Sanchez.” 

    Although the 2017 referendum passed overwhelmingly, it was declared illegal by Spain’s constitutional court. Junts leader Carles Puigdemont fled to Belgium after the failed independence bid, dodging charges of rebellion, sedition and the misuse of public funds. The sedition charges against Puigdemont were dropped last January, and the Junts leader is expected to return to Catalonia when the amnesty bill comes into force later this month.

    With Illa now seeking coalition partners, Puigdemont has called on the ERC not to join forces with the PSC. A former ally of ERC leader Pere Aragones, Puigdemont said on Sunday that “if Esquerra is willing to rebuild bridges” and build a coalition of pro-independence parties to keep the PSC out of government, “we will also be willing.”






  21. Site: RT - News
    4 days 14 hours ago
    Author: RT

    Sweden would accept nuclear weapons on its soil but only in the event of war, Ulf Kristersson has said

    Sweden could potentially allow the US to station nuclear weapons on its territory, but only if the country is drawn into a military conflict, Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson has said.

    In an interview with Sveriges Radio on Monday, Kristersson stressed that since joining NATO, the government has submitted two proposals to parliament, stating that Stockholm will not host permanent foreign troops or nuclear weapons in peacetime.

    However, he said such prohibitions would be lifted if Sweden, which has not been at war since 1814, becomes part of an active military conflict. “In a war situation, it is a completely different matter,” the prime minister said, adding that “all of NATO benefits from the nuclear umbrella that must be in place in democratic states as long as Russia has its nuclear weapons.”

    Kristersson also emphasized that it is up to Sweden to decide which foreign weapons – if any – would be stationed on its territory.

    The premier’s comments come ahead of a June parliamentary vote on a Defense Cooperation Agreement with the US, which would give Washington access to Stockholm’s military bases.

    Read more  Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski. Polish foreign minister rebukes president over US nukes

    Unlike its Nordic neighbors Finland and Norway, Sweden has no explicit ban on accepting nuclear arms, but maintains a long-standing policy against hosting such weapons in peacetime.

    Critics have urged Stockholm to change its stance on the matter, warning that the lack of legislation on a complete ban of nukes could create problems in a critical situation, given Sweden’s NATO membership.

    The US currently maintains nuclear weapons in five fellow NATO countries – Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium, Italy and Türkiye – as part of the bloc’s nuclear sharing program.

    Sweden, along with Finland, applied to join the US-led military alliance shortly after the start of the Ukraine conflict. While Finland became a member state last year, Sweden did not officially join until March, with progress hampered by Hungary and Türkiye, which voiced grievances in bilateral relations.

  22. Site: AsiaNews.it
    4 days 14 hours ago
    Outgoing Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, 72, is stepping down two years later than planned because of COVID-19. His successor, who will be sworn in on Wednesday, now has to tackle some of the city-state's toughest issues, like housing, an aging population, and an inadequate welfare system.
  23. Site: LifeNews
    4 days 15 hours ago
    Author: Right to Life UK

    Diana Johnson and Stella Creasy have tabled amendments to the Criminal Justice Bill that would make extreme changes to our abortion laws.

    How would they change the law?

    Both amendments would make it more likely that healthy babies are aborted at home for any reason, up to birth.

    Diana Johnson’s amendment (NC1) would remove offences that make it illegal for a woman to perform her own abortion at any point right through to birth.

    Stella Creasy’s amendment (NC40) would remove key deterrents against performing an abortion at any point right through to birth.

    These amendments would likely lead to a significant increase in the number of women performing late-term abortions at home, endangering the lives of many more women.  They would also lead to an increased number of viable babies’ lives being ended well beyond the 24-week abortion time limit and beyond the point at which they would be able to survive outside the womb.

    SUPPORT LIFENEWS! If you want to help fight abortion, please donate to LifeNews.com!

    Stella Creasy’s amendment would also remove key deterrents against hiding the body of a dead baby. These deterrents are in place to help prevent individuals from obstructing an investigation into the cause of a child’s death when infanticide is suspected.

    In addition, Stella Creasy’s amendment would also remove key safeguards provided by the Abortion Act through to 24 weeks. Abortion would be available on demand, for any reason, up to 24 weeks.

    Sex-selective abortion would become legal – women could obtain, and abortion providers could perform, abortions for sex-selective purposes up to 24 weeks.

    The legal safeguard requiring two qualified doctors to approve an abortion would be removed, the legal requirement that abortions take place under the care of a qualified doctor would be removed and there would be no restrictions on where abortions could be performed.

    There would be no legal deterrent against women performing their own abortions at home using abortion pills up to 24 weeks, beyond the current 10-week legal limit for at-home abortions. This would present a grave risk to women’s health.

    LifeNews Note: Republished with permission from Right to Life UK.

    The post British MPs Want to Legalize Abortions Up to Birth appeared first on LifeNews.com.

  24. Site: Zero Hedge
    4 days 15 hours ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    Even If Powell "Can't See The Stag And Can't See The Flation", Consumers Can

    By Benjamin Picton, Senior Macro Strategist at Rabobank

    Bumps and Potholes

    UK Q1 GDP surprised to the upside at the end of last week to print at +0.6%, rather than the more modest 0.4% that market economists had been expecting. That means that Britain is officially out of recession. Perhaps even more importantly for Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, GDP per capita grew for the first time in two years and the Governor of the Bank of England has been talking about rate cuts. The FT reports that corporate takeover activity for UK companies has hit the highest level since 2018 as international capital managers realise that UK stocks are comparatively cheap. Suddenly, everything is coming up Rishi, but that’s unlikely to save him from an electoral drubbing later in the year.

    Of course, faster economic growth can in some ways be a double-edged sword. If the economy is turning over more quickly, it raises questions about inflationary pressures – which might delay those rate cuts that Governor Bailey was hinting at. In the case of the UK this might not be an issue because the stronger GDP result was driven by fixed capital formation – suggesting that businesses are investing to raise the speed limit of the economy – while households seem to have taken Huw Pill’s advice to accept that they are poorer and kept a lid on their own spending.

    Over in Canada it might be a different story. Labour market figures for April showed employment growth of 90,000 in the month. That’s a mighty bounce back from the loss of 2,200 jobs in March, and well above the consensus estimate of +20,000 jobs. The unemployment rate duly fell (despite a 1-tick climb in the participation rate) to a still high 6.1%, and hourly wages growth also came in firmer than expected at 4.8% y-o-y (albeit down on March’s 5% figure).

    Consequently, the 65% probability of a June rate cut that the OIS futures were suggesting last Thursday has suddenly fallen to a 45% probability. The market is still fully-priced for a cut by July, but only just.

    There were further bumps in the road for the global crusade against inflation last Friday when the latest iteration of the University of Michigan consumer sentiment report was released. Consumer confidence dropped like a rock, all the way from 77.2 in April to 67.4 in May. Both ‘current conditions’ and ‘future expectations’ looked grim, which perhaps suggests a “plague on both your houses” attitude to the two leading contenders for the Presidency. Crucially, 1-year inflation expectations leapt from 3.2% to 3.5%, and 5-10 year expectations (generally a low volatility number) edged higher from 3% to 3.1%. Even if Jerome Powell “can’t see the stag and can’t see the flation”, it appears that consumers can.

    Powell is scheduled to speak tomorrow, but the timing presents a few potential landmines for the Fed Chief. Powell’s remarks will come after the release of April PPI figures, but ahead of the CPI report. CPI is likely to be the key point of interest for financial markets this week, but there’s also the not-insignificant issue of big new tariffs on Chinese EVs (amongst other things) expected to be announced tomorrow. The CPI numbers are expected to print at +0.4% m-o-m, as they did in March. Unfortunately, 0.4% m-o-m is incompatible with 2% annual inflation, so Powell might still be a little cagey on there whereabouts of the stag and the ‘flation.

    Japan, China and Australia have lately thrown up some potholes in the road back to at-target inflation. Japanese March labour cash earning figures reported last week showed year-on-year growth of less than half the expected number. China PPI slipped further into deflation at -2.5% in April (although CPI nudged up slightly to 0.3%) and aggregate financing actually fell for the first time since 2005.

    China’s housing woes are clearly ongoing, and it appears that this has started to worry Xi Jinping, who is reportedly looking at ways to protect state-owned developers that may also help to staunch the balance sheet recession being experienced by Chinese households. The long-awaited stimulus bazooka might be on the way (of sorts), but almost certainly not for private sector developers who might be too close to decadent Western-style capitalists for Xi’s liking.

    The fortunes of Chinese real estate developers are of particular interest to Australia, since bulk commodities used in the production of steel and concrete (iron ore, coking coal) sit atop the list of Australia’s major exports.

    The Australian Government will deliver a budget tomorrow night - Treasurer Jim Chalmers’ third, and likely his second successive surplus. The now traditional pre-budget leaks to the media suggest a more growth-oriented fiscal impulse which would ordinarily be a concern for the RBA - who inexplicably maintained their neutral outlook on interest rates last week, despite big upward revisions in their inflation forecasts and downward revisions to unemployment forecasts.

    One suspects that the RBA dead-batted the strong Q1 inflation print of a week earlier with the benefit of advance warning from Treasury that budget initiatives would substantially reduce measured CPI. Treasury is reportedly expecting CPI to be back below 3% by the end of the year as new subsidies for electricity bills, rent assistance and childcare shift the burden of payment from households to government. Those increased subsidies will mechanically reduce measured CPI, but they won’t reduce underlying cost pressures, which will instead be paid through the tax system. Happily, the budget will also include income tax cuts.

    So, there have been a few bumps to inflation here, and a few unanticipated drops there. Ultimately the US CPI report will be the main game of the week as markets look for continued signs of an upward trend in price pressures.

    Tyler Durden Mon, 05/13/2024 - 11:30
  25. Site: Zero Hedge
    4 days 15 hours ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    Household Finance Fears Worst Since COVID As Inflation Expectations Surged In April, NY Fed Survey Finds

    Well if Fed Chair Powell couldn't see the 'flation' before, perhaps he can now...

    After flatlining around 3.,0% for the last four months the median one-year-ahead inflation expectations increased to 3.3%, according to The New York Fed's April Survey of Consumer Expectations.

    They also increased to 2.8 percent from 2.6 percent at the five-year-ahead horizon, while decreasing to 2.8 percent from 2.9 percent at the three-year horizon.

    Home price expectations ticked up to 3.3 percent after seven consecutive months at 3.0 percent, reaching their highest level since July 2022.

    Consumers also anticipated faster price growth for gasoline, food, medical care, a college education and rents, according to the New York Fed survey.

    The data follow a string of reports that have indicated sticky inflation and a relentless run-up in home prices.

    Data out this week is projected to show US consumer prices still rose at stubborn pace last month, and shelter has been consistently responsible for boosting measures of inflation.

    All of which is hammering household budgets as the share of consumers that expect they’ll miss a minimum debt payment over the next three months is at the highest since the onset of the pandemic.

    Finally, views of the labor market worsened, with earnings growth expectations decreasing and the probability of higher unemployment rising.

    Respondents were also less confident in their ability to find a new job if they lost their current one, falling to the lowest reading in three years.

    So - all things considered - not the shiny basket of awesomeness that 'Bidenomics' keeps being promoted as eh?

    Tyler Durden Mon, 05/13/2024 - 11:19
  26. Site: RT - News
    4 days 15 hours ago
    Author: RT

    An all-out attack on the city of Rafah in Gaza would only provoke “anarchy,” the US secretary of state has insisted

    US Secretary of State Antony Blinken has criticized Israel’s conduct of the war in Gaza, claiming that an all-out offensive on Rafah in the south of the Palestinian enclave would only provoke “anarchy,” rather than eliminating Hamas.

    In a pair of TV interviews on Sunday, Blinken underscored that Washington believes Israeli forces should “get out of Gaza” as their tactics have failed to neutralize Hamas and could drive a lasting insurgency.

    The top US diplomat told CBS that a full-scale invasion of Rafah could come “potentially at an incredibly high cost” for civilians, and that even a massive assault on the southern Gazan city was unlikely to end the threat from Hamas.

    “Israel is on the trajectory, potentially, to inherit an insurgency with many armed Hamas left, or if it leaves [Gaza] a vacuum filled by chaos, filled by anarchy and probably refilled by Hamas,” Blinken stated.

    He pointed out that the militant group had already returned to certain areas of northern Gaza that Israel had “liberated.” 

    Washington is waiting to see credible plans from West Jerusalem for Gaza once the war is finally over, Blinken said in another interview with NBC, adding “we’ve been talking to them [Israeli authorities] about a much better way of getting an enduring result.” 

    Blinken’s comments come as Israeli forces have been pushing deeper into the densely populated Rafah, where more than a million Palestinians have crowded in hopes of refuge.

    Read more Gaza residents search for survivors in the rubble of a house destroyed in an Israeli strike on Nuseirat Refugee Camp, May 10, 2024 US unveils results of Israel war crimes probe

    The bombardment in the eastern parts of Rafah has already sent 300,000 Gazans fleeing, according to local authorities. Israel has claimed that the city hosts four battalions of Hamas fighters.

    On Friday, Blinken delivered a report to Congress on the Israeli military’s operations in Gaza that said it is “reasonable to assess” that the Jewish state has violated international humanitarian law. The report, however, stopped short of formally finding that the Israeli military had already done so. It also claimed there is no “complete information” about whether US weapons were used in those actions.

    US President Joe Biden admitted last week that at least some Palestinian civilians in Gaza were killed by American-made bombs, and vowed to halt the supply of any weapons that Israel could use in a major military operation in Rafah.

    The White House recently suspended the supply of some larger-payload bombs that Israel could use in its new offensive, outraging staunch supporters of the Jewish state.

    Israel declared war on Hamas in Gaza following the militant group’s deadly October 7 incursion, which claimed over 1,200 lives and saw hundreds of Israelis taken hostage.

    Over 35,000 Palestinians have been killed and 78,755 wounded as a result of the Israeli retaliatory offensive in Gaza, according to the health ministry in the Hamas-run territory.

  27. Site: LifeNews
    4 days 15 hours ago
    Author: McKenna Snow

    Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) is backing an Indiana high school student’s legal challenge of how her school shut down her pro-life club because it was accused of “being too ‘political.’”

    “Students don’t forfeit their free speech when they walk into the school building. All students have the constitutional right to express their ideas without fear of being silenced by school officials and having their clubs derecognized,” ADF stated in a May 8 news release.

    In April, ADF joined legal firm Charitable Allies’ appeal of a federal court’s decision that had sided with the public school in the case, E.D. v. Noblesville School District.

    In 2021, a freshman student at Noblesville High School (NHS) in Indiana started a pro-life club aimed at “[raising] awareness and [generating] discussion about the abortion issue while also doing something about it through volunteering,” according to the news release.

    The freshman who started the club, who is referred to in the news release as “E.D.,” received official approval of the Noblesville Students for Life club from the principal after going through the school’s required steps. The club gained 30 member sign-ups at the fall activities fair soon after.

    E.D. made a flyer about the club’s upcoming meeting that included photos of students outside of the U.S. Supreme Court holding signs that read, “Defund Planned Parenthood,” “I Reject Abortion,” and other, similar statements.

    SUPPORT LIFENEWS! If you want to help fight abortion, please donate to LifeNews.com!

    School administrators told her that she needed to remove the picture that referenced Planned Parenthood because it was “political,” and that if she refused, she could not post the flyer.

    ADF noted that there was no written policy prohibiting the flyer.

    E.D. met with an administrator again about the flyer, but shortly after, the principal derecognized the club.

    In December 2021, Charitable Allies filed a lawsuit on behalf of E.D. in federal court, but the court later sided with the public school. Charitable Allies appealed the decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit in March 2024. In April, ADF lawyers joined Charitable Allies in the Court of Appeals to represent the pro-life club and E.D.

    ADF noted in the news release that other clubs at the school include the Campus Crusade for Christ, Gender and Sexuality Alliance, Noblesville Young Democrats, and Young Republicans.

    “This isn’t just about a flyer—it’s about a public school telling a high schooler that she can’t express a message that’s important to her,” ADF stated in the news release.

    The post High School Shuts Down Pro-Life Club for Being “Too Political” appeared first on LifeNews.com.

  28. Site: Zero Hedge
    4 days 15 hours ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    Jen Psaki Claims Biden Never Looked At Watch, Suggests Gold Star Parents Lied

    You know it's bad when Axios is calling out Jen Psaki for lying about President Biden checking his watch during a ceremony for soldiers killed during the botched 2021 Afghanistan withdrawal.

    In her new book, "Say More," the former White House press secretary claims that Biden looked at his watch only after the ceremony had ended, contradicting fact-checks (even Snopes) and on-the-record statements from Gold Star families who were there.

    Psaki says Biden critics were engaged in "misinformation" and used the image to make "him appear insensitive, concerned only about how much time had passed."

    The Associated Press photographer on the tarmac snapped two photos of Biden looking at his watch twice and 10 minutes apart, as fact-checkers at USA Today and Snopes noted soon afterward. -Axios

    Psaki also 'mistakenly cited' a passage from the Washington Post to reinforce her lie - when what she quoted was actually from USA Today's fact check article, not the post. The fact check noted that Biden looked at his watch at the end of the ceremony, but also concluded that "photos and video show [Biden] also checked his watch during the ceremony."

    More via Axios:

    Many family members of the 13 soldiers killed during the explosion at the Abbey Gate base in Kabul have consistently said in interviews and appearances before Congress that Biden checked his watch as the caskets went by.

    • Mark Schmitz, the father of Marine Lance Cpl. Jared Schmitz, told Congress in August of 2023 that "while I stood there on the tarmac watching you check your watch over and over again, all I wanted to do was shout out, 'It's two f***ing thirty, asshole.' "
    • The day after the ceremony on Aug. 29, 2021, Shana Chappell, the mother of Marine Lance Cpl. Kareem Nikoui, wrote on Facebook: "I watched you disrespect us all 5 different times by checking your watch!!! What the f*** was so important that you had to keep looking at your watch????"

    .@jrpsaki I’ve spoke to these parents.

    Calling Gold Star families liars - even when there’s photographic proof - is a pathetic partisan attempt to defend your boss and a bad look. https://t.co/XoZi6VTETX

    — Rep. Mike Waltz (@michaelgwaltz) May 13, 2024

    Psaki Responds

    While initially declining to comment, Psaki told Axios that the "detail in a few lines of the book about the exact number of times he looked at his watch will be removed in future reprints and the ebook," adding "The story on Afghanistan is really about the importance of delivering feedback even when it is difficult told through my own experience of telling President Biden that his own story of loss was not well received by the families who were grieving their sons and daughters."

    https://t.co/dr3KFWKTQO pic.twitter.com/7y9URnyPXU

    — Peter J. Hasson (@peterjhasson) May 13, 2024

    Democrats consistently rewrite history.

    This is a particularly despicable instance of this.

    What do the Dems running for Congress in #WI03 have to say about this disgrace?

    Nothing.

    They will not even bother to protect Americans on social media, what do you think they would… https://t.co/DCKiDSdvU8

    — Derrick Van Orden (@derrickvanorden) May 13, 2024
    Tyler Durden Mon, 05/13/2024 - 11:00
  29. Site: Zero Hedge
    4 days 16 hours ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    Lindsey Graham Suggests Nuking Iran And Hamas

    Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity.news,

    Warmonger in chief Lindsey Graham suggested Sunday that Israel, with the help of the US, should use nuclear weapons on Iran and Hamas fighters in Palestinian territories.

    Appearing on NBC News’ “Meet the Press,” the Republican Senator asked “Why did we drop two bombs, nuclear bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?”

    “To end a war that we couldn’t afford to lose,” Graham continued, adding “You don’t understand, apparently, what Israel is facing. They’re facing three groups: Iran, who has received $80 billion in aid… They’re taking that money to kill all the Jews.”

    Graham claimed that Israel is facing a significant threat to its existence, and therefore should do whatever it takes, just as the US did in World War Two.

    Lindsey Graham suggests dropping big fat NUKES on Iran and Hamas. Doesn't explain how that would work, just says 'it was ok when we did it to Japan'. Full report here: https://t.co/I5kmBiK9OQ pic.twitter.com/LdHXnNVTYd

    — m o d e r n i t y (@ModernityNews) May 13, 2024

    “Why is it okay for America to drop two nuclear bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki to end their existential threat war?”

    Graham continued, adding “Why was it okay for us to do that? I thought it was okay. To Israel, do whatever you have to do to survive as a Jewish state.”

    “Give Israel the bombs they need to end the war they can’t afford to lose and work with them to minimise casualties,” Graham urged.

    Host Kristen Welker provided some pushback, noting that there are now more advanced weapons that could be deployed, rather than just dropping a big fat nuke, and that there might be an alternative to all out war.

    But Graham wasn’t having it, stating “When you’re telling the world you’re going to restrict weapons delivery to the Jewish state who is fighting a three-front war for their survival, it emboldens Iran, it emboldens Hamas.”

    It’s hardly surprising coming from Graham, who has been calling for wiping Iran off the face of the Earth for years now. But how exactly is Israel going to nuke Hamas without causing more untold carnage to millions of innocent people, including those in its own country?

    *  *  *

    Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.

    Tyler Durden Mon, 05/13/2024 - 10:40
  30. Site: LifeNews
    4 days 16 hours ago
    Author: Steven Ertelt

    Robert F. Kennedy Jr. tried to walk back his stance on abortion over the weekend, but probably ended up making it worse.

    As LifeNews reported on Friday, RFK Jr. gave an interview in which he confirmed he supports abortions up to birth.

    “Even if it’s full-term,” Kennedy said in response to a follow-up question.

    This weekend, Kennedy clarified that he means that he supports killing babies in abortions up to birth only if they’re disabled. He says he meant that late-term abortions should be reserved for babies with major health problems that affect their viability.

    “Cases like this are why I am leery of inserting the government into abortion,” Kennedy wrote. “I had been assuming that virtually all late-term abortions were such cases, but I’ve learned that my assumption was wrong. Sometimes, women abort healthy, viable late-term fetuses. These cases of purely ‘elective’ late-term abortion are very upsetting. Once the baby is viable outside the womb, it should have rights and it deserves society’s protection.”

    Click here to sign up for pro-life news alerts from LifeNews.com

    The problem is this so-called health exception essentially continues allowing abortions up to birth, even on health babies. First, studies have confirmed that prenatal tests are notoriously wrong and often show false positives that may prompt abortions of health babies. Secondly, thousands of anecdotal stories over the years have confirmed the studies to be true as mothers and couples have rejected doctors’ suggestions to have abortions of supposedly disabled babies only to give birth to babies who are either healthy or have problems that can be corrected with treatment or surgery.

    Even taking Kennedy’s comments at face value, he still supports abortion on demand through viability – meaning he’s fine with 90% of the 65 million abortions that have killed babies since Roe.

    Although Kennedy may not support late-term aboritons personally, his answer Friday makes it crystal clear that his policial policy would allow late-term abortions with no limits.

    During an interview with podcaster Sage Steele, the former ESPN host asked Kennedy what the limit should be for women to have an abortion. “Should there be a limit or are you saying all the way up to full-term, a woman has a right to have an abortion?” she said.

    Kennedy answered that he doesn’t think anyone would want to do that at eight months of pregnancy, but abortion should be out of the hands of the government and in the hands of women.

    Steele continued to push Kennedy, asking if he agrees with the Roe v. Wade standard or with abortion being left up to the states, and Kennedy reiterated that the decision should not lie with the states but with the mother.

    “Even if it’s full-term,” Kennedy said in response to a follow-up question. “I don’t think it’s ever okay,” he added. When Steele says that would allow late-term abortions, Kennedy said, “I think we have to leave it to the women rather than the state.”

    Kennedy and his campaign clarified last year that he supports abortions up to birth without limits.

    Kennedy will be on the ballot in Utah, Michigan, California, Delaware, and Oklahoma, according to his campaign and its working to get him on the ballot in New Hampshire, Nevada, Hawaii, North Carolina, Idaho, Nebraska, Iowa, and Ohio.

    The post Robert F Kennedy Jr. Says It’s Okay to Kill Babies in Abortions Up to Birth if They’re Disabled appeared first on LifeNews.com.

  31. Site: RT - News
    4 days 16 hours ago
    Author: RT

    Beijing’s close ties with Moscow “cast doubt” on its relationship with Europe, Germany’s ambassador to China has said

    China’s stance on the Ukraine conflict and close ties with Russia call into question its relationship with Germany and Europe, Berlin’s ambassador to Beijing has said.

    China has ramped up trade with Russia since the start of the conflict, while refusing to condemn Moscow’s actions, Patricia Flor said in an interview with the South China Morning Post on Monday.

    ”For Germans and Europeans, Russia’s aggression is an existential threat. This is a nuclear power next to us that just invaded its neighbour. It has really shaken up people,” Flor told the news outlet. “The situation casts doubt on China’s relations with Germany and Europe.”

    German Chancellor Olaf Scholz paid a visit to China in April, and met with President Xi Jinping, who outlined four principles to prevent the conflict in Ukraine from escalating. Among them was for the West to stop “adding fuel to the fire,” which he said would lay the groundwork for peace.

    Read more Chinese President Xi Jinping at the Elysee Palace in Paris, on May 6, 2024. Xi refuses to back Zelensky’s unilateral ‘peace conference’

    Germany, a NATO member, has emerged as a top supplier of military equipment and weapons to Kiev, and has trained Ukrainian soldiers. In 2022 and 2023, Berlin spent around €6.6 billion ($7.13 billion) on military assistance to the country, according to government data.

    Beijing has insisted it remains neutral in the Ukraine conflict, and repeatedly called for the crisis to be settled through negotiations. 

    Economic ties between China and Russia are also “of great concern” to Germany, Flor said, referring to the alleged supply of dual-use goods and components by China to Russia. Western countries claim that the goods can be used by the Russian military. The US said in April that it was ready to impose secondary sanctions against Beijing over its alleged support for the Russian defense industry.

    READ MORE: German party disciplines regional MP over visit to Moscow

    China has denied selling weapons to Russia. In April, Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning insisted that China “regulates the export of dual-use articles in accordance with laws and regulations,” and urged “relevant countries” not to “smear or attack the normal relations between China and Russia.”

    Following the introduction of sanctions against Russia by the US, the EU and their allies, Russia redirected its trade flows to the Asia-Pacific market, primarily to China. Trade between the nations hit an all-time high of $240 billion in 2023. 

  32. Site: Zero Hedge
    4 days 16 hours ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    Market Manipulation Trial Over Bill Hwang's Spectacular $36 Billion Implosion Begins This Week

    The trial over Bill Hwang's Archegos Capital Management begins this week.

    The charges in Hwang's trial come from the 2021 collapse of the $36 billion dollar Archegos and Reuters has said that testimony could last up to 8 weeks. Prosecutors have said that Archegos' collapse led to $100 billion in shareholder losses at companies he held.

    The trial is set to shed a light on how major Wall Street players accommodated, and potentially turned a blind eye, to risky tactics from a wealthy client. Hwang is being accused of using total return swaps to take massive positions in companies without holding their underlying stock. 

    As Reuters notes, the company faced crippling margin calls in March 2021 due to falling stock prices. This, in turn, led to significant losses for Archegos and its lenders, including Credit Suisse and Nomura Holdings.

    Archegos founder Bill Hwang and CFO Patrick Halligan, charged with racketeering conspiracy and multiple counts of fraud and market manipulation, have pleaded not guilty.

    They contest the prosecutors' claims of market manipulation, which some legal experts view as a challenging case for the government. The trial is expected to feature testimony from Archegos’s guilty-pleading head trader and Chief Risk Officer, alongside potential appearances from bank executives.

    Hwang was arrested in April 2022 and charged with racketeering conspiracy, securities fraud and wire fraud in connection with a scheme to manipulate the share prices of public companies in order to boost profits. He was then released on $100 million bail. At the time, he told authorities that he had "lost his passport" and so his wife surrendered hers instead. As we noted, he also lived just minutes from Teterboro airport in New Jersey. 

    Chief Financial Officer Patrick Halligan, also pleaded not guilty and was freed on $1 million bail and had his travel limited.

    According to the 40-page indictment, Hwang engaged in a "fraudulent scheme" that included "interlocking deceptive acts and misconduct, through false and misleading statements to security-based swap ("SBS") counterparties and prime brokers and manipulative trading designed to artificially move the market, which, in tandem, increased Archegos’s assets under management from around $4 billion to over $36 billion in just under six months."

    In order to overcome this issue, Archegos "chose not to rely on ordinary market forces," and instead "engaged in a brazen scheme to manipulate the market for the securities of the issuers that represented Archegos’s top 10 holdings" by purchasing both securities and SBSs related to those issuers.

    Archegos, through Hwang and Tomita, effected this scheme by dominating the market for its Top 10 Holdings, as well as by “setting the tone” (i.e., engaging in large pre-market trading), bidding up prices by entering incrementally higher limit orders throughout the trading day, and “marking the close” (i.e., engaging in large trading in the last 30 minutes of the trading day) and by other non-economic trading, all with the goal of artificially inflating the share prices of its Top 10 Holdings.

    To fuel the alleged manipulation, Archegos used margin extended by counterparties - which Hwang and crew 'deliberately misled', because had they answered truthfully after they began asking questions, it "would have led Archegos to exhaust the finite trading resource that its Counterparties provided."

    As a reminder, Archegos amassed a concentrated portfolio of stocks well in excess of $100 billion by using borrowed money in the form of TRS, which kept the exposure on the books of the various prime brokers working with Archegos, thus allowing Hwang to hide his full exposure.

    Hwang is a former protégé of hedge-fund titan Julian Robertson, who founded Tiger Management in 1980, which as the Wall Street Journal reports, turned $8.8 million into nearly $22 billion. Several investors trained by Robertson became known as the "Tiger cubs."

    Tyler Durden Mon, 05/13/2024 - 10:20
  33. Site: AsiaNews.it
    4 days 16 hours ago
    The University of Santo Tomas announced a new course on the 58th World Communications Day, to start with the next academic year. For Prof Felipe Salvosa II, it will provide the tools to assess 'the impact of misinformation and disinformation on various fields of study and the democratic system'. The course "Digital Literacy, Fact-Checking, and Verification" is a response to Pope Francis' message on the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI).
  34. Site: Mises Institute
    4 days 16 hours ago
    Author: Frank Shostak
    Contrary to mainstream economists, credit expansion that is not backed by real savings leads ultimately to an economic downturn.
  35. Site: Mises Institute
    4 days 16 hours ago
    Author: Frank Shostak
    Contrary to mainstream economists, credit expansion that is not backed by real savings leads ultimately to an economic downturn.
  36. Site: Steyn Online
    4 days 16 hours ago
    Just ahead of Part Twenty-Five of our vernal diversion, The Secret Adversary by Agatha Christie, a quick thank you for all your kind words on this seventh birthday of The Mark Steyn Club, and especially about Tales for Our Time. We always like to hear
  37. Site: Steyn Online
    4 days 16 hours ago
    Last week was the seventh birthday of The Mark Steyn Club and we thank all those First Week Founding Members who decided to re-up for our eighth season. We hope our First Fortnight members will want to do the same in the days ahead. One of those renewing
  38. Site: Zero Hedge
    4 days 16 hours ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    Musk Wins Latest Censorship Battle In Australia As High Court Rules Against eSafety Commissioner

    Authored by Rebekah Barnett via 'Dystopian Down Under' blog,

    Can Australia’s eSafety Commissioner block content globally on demand? Not today, ruled the Australian Federal Court, in a win for Elon Musk’s social media platform X.

    US billionaire Elon Musk (left), Australian eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant (right)

    In a decision this morning, Justice Geoffrey Kennett refused to extend a temporary injunction obtained by eSafety last month, which forced X to remove footage of the Wakeley church stabbing, an alleged religiously motivated terror attack.

    Under the Online Safety Act (2021), the eSafety Commissioner, Julie Inman Grant, has the authority to order removal of such ‘class 1 material’ within Australia under threat of hefty fines.

    eSafety argued that X had not gone far enough to block the content from Australians, as a geo-block can be circumvented by a VPN. X argued that eSafety was effectively seeking a global ban on content, straying outside of the Australian online harm regulator’s jurisdiction.

    eSafety applied to the Federal Court to extend its temporary injunction against X, with a hearing taking place on Friday 10 May. The temporary injunction was due to expire at 5pm on Friday, but was extended to 5pm today, presumably to allow time for Justice Kennett to deliver a decision on the matter.

    This morning, Justice Kennett determined that, “The orders of the court will be that the application to extend … is refused,” meaning that at the time of publishing, the injunction is no longer effective. A written decision with the Judge’s reasoning is yet to be published.

    In a statement on the Federal Court decision, eSafety said that the matter will return to Court for a case management hearing on Wednesday, 15 May.

    Source: X

    "The application for this injunction should have never been brought," said Dr Reuben Kirkham, Co-Director of the Free Speech Union of Australia (FSU) in a statement today, questioning the validity of the Commissioner’s bid to enact a global content ban on X.

    “The eSafety Commissioner is overreaching and behaving more like an activist than a responsible public servant.”

    Dr Kirkham, who was present for the hearing on Friday, told Dystopian Down Under that he counted 12 lawyers present (seven for X, five for eSafety), which, if eSafety is ordered to pay costs, will lump tax payers with “a considerable amount of unnecessary legal costs.”

    Digital civil liberties nonprofit the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) echoes FSU Australia’s position, stating that, “no single country should be able to restrict speech across the entire internet,” and likening the Commissioner’s actions to “[using] a sledgehammer to crack a nut.”

    An affidavit submitted by the EFF to the eSafety vs. X proceedings last week called for the Court to consider the international impact that a ruling in eSafety’s favour would have in setting a precedent for allowing one country to enforce content bans on citizens of other countries.

    “If one court can impose speech-restrictive rules on the entire Internet—despite direct conflicts with laws [in] a foreign jurisdiction as well as international human rights principles—the norms of expectations of all internet users are at risk,” stated the EFF in an article summarising the affidavit.

    X’s Global Government Affairs posted about the hearing, stating, “We’re glad X is fighting back, and we hope the judge will recognize the eSafety regulator’s demand for what it is—a big step toward unchecked global censorship—and refuse to let Australia set another dangerous precedent." At the time of publishing, no updated statement on the Judge’s decision had been issued.

    Source: X

    Dr Kirkham calls the Commissioner’s application to extend her injunction against X “part of a pattern where the eSafety Commissioner’s office seemingly engages in gamesmanship rather than respecting the rule of law or acting as a model litigant.”

    Indeed, today’s ruling in X’s favour comes amidst mounting controversy over the eSafety Commissioner’s ongoing stoush with X, which appears to be driven partly by Julie Inman Grant’s global censorship ambitions, and partly by personal feelings.

    Inman Grant, who formerly directed Twitter’s Public Policy (Australia and Southeast Asia), has repeatedly criticised Elon Musk since his purchase of the Twitter platform in 2022.

    Moreover, Musks’s advocacy for a broad interpretation of free speech on the internet conflicts with Inman Grant’s professed view of free speech as a right that needs to be “recalibrated” for online spaces.

    For its part, X has failed to comply with routine reporting to the eSafety Commissioner’s satisfaction, leading eSafety to initiate civil penalty proceedings against X in December last year. If found non-compliant, X could be fined up to AUD $780,000 per day, backdated to March 2023, when the determination of non-compliance was made.

    Perhaps the biggest controversy between X and eSafety centres on the highly charged and subective issue of gender ideology.

    Inman Grant has enforced removal of a string of posts on X questioning gender ideology, including one suggesting that men can’t breastfeed, and another about a trans-identified male who allegedly injured female players during a women's football game in NSW.

    In an internationally high-profile case, the Commissioner recently issued a removal notice over an acerbic gender-critical post by Canadian activist Billboard Chris, raising questions over whether the Government should be able to police opinions and censor statements of biological fact on the internet.

    FSU Australia is currently involved in Administrative Appeal Tribunal proceedings on behalf of Billboard Chris (real name Chris Elston) against the eSafety Commissioner. Additionally, X has threatened to sue eSafety over the matter.

    Source: X

    Returning to the issue of the Wakeley stabbing footage, Inman Grant’s attempt to globally ban the content has been supported by the Australian Government, which leveraged the incident to call for more censorship, including the reintroduction of an unpopular misinformation bill.

    Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has also responded to calls to address violence against women by proposing to further expand eSafety’s budget and remit, which could see deep fake pornography and “other misogynistic material” censored by the regulator.

    No one will argue against explicit pornography being blocked from children’s view, but it is around the grey edges of definition creep on terms like ‘harm’, ‘adult cyber abuse’ and ‘misogynistic material’ where disagreements will undoubtedly kick-off.

    In a move of ‘no confidence’ against eSafety, FSU Australia has launched a petition to abolish the office of the eSafety Commissioner altogether, arguing that a combination of parental controls and platform incentives will suffice in keeping children safe on the internet.

    A more moderate approach may be to curtail eSafety’s remit to its original function of dealing with child abuse content (as in 2015), and revenge porn (as in 2017), before the regulator’s purview and powers were significantly expanded with the introduction of the Online Safety Act in 2021.

    However, in the media and political conversation, there is little appetite for a moderate approach, as conveyed in a viral guest appearance by media personality Tracey Holmes on a recent episode of the ABC’s failing show Q+A.

    Calling out the double standard in the censorship conversation, Holmes told the studio audience,

    “I don’t agree with any kind of censorship in a general sense. I don’t think Elon Musk is contributing to any social cohesion split inside this country. I think our mainstream media is doing enough of that. I think our politicians do enough of that…

    “Of course there are fault lines everywhere, but there’s only one way you can stop those fault lines from getting bigger, and that is to have the ability to have the town square to hear different points of view…

    “And I think unfortunately we’ve been fed ‘this side or that side’ for so long, people are giving up on mainstream media, that’s why they’re tuning out. That’s why they’re going to YouTube… we have let them down.”

    Hopefully, some higher-ups in the corporate media tuned to hear what Holmes had to say.

    *  *  *

    To support Rebekah's work, share, subscribe, and/or make a one-off contribution to DDU via my Kofi account. Thanks! Follow her on X

    Tyler Durden Mon, 05/13/2024 - 10:00
  39. Site: Zero Hedge
    4 days 17 hours ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    Key Events This Week: All Eyes On CPI As Fed Speakers Galore

    After a very slow week, the key event for markets this week will be US inflation data with April’s PPI (Tuesday) and CPI (Wednesday) the highlights. We’ll see if the higher-than-expected US inflation seen in Q1 extends into Q2 or not. Markets will also hear from Powell (tomorrow) and Vice Chair Jefferson (today) as the highlights of a busy Fedspeak calendar that are included in the day-by-day list at the end. The next most important US data release is Retail Sales on Wednesday.

    Elsewhere China’s monthly activity numbers (Friday) are important, and staying in Asia, we also have Japanese PPI (tomorrow) and Q1 GDP (Thursday). In Europe tomorrow’s ZEW survey in Germany and UK labor market stats are highlights. Swedish CPI (Wednesday) may get a little extra attention after last week's Riksbank cut, only the second G10 currency to ease this cycle after Switzerland earlier in the year. Earnings season quietens with only 7 S&P 500 companies and 69 Stoxx 600 companies reporting.

    Previewing the main events now and let’s start chronologically with regards to US inflation. For PPI tomorrow, the headline (+0.3% consensus, vs. +0.2% previously) and core (+0.2% consensus vs. +0.2% last month) are always less important than the key components that feed into the core PCE deflator – namely, health care services, portfolio management and domestic airfares. As DB economists point out, whilst the March health care services print was relatively soft (+0.1%), the six-month annualized growth rate of 3.5% was still higher than at any point in the decade prior to the pandemic. They also highlight that with respect to portfolio management, the strength in asset market performance leading up to March should result in a strong print for April, given the typical lags.

    With regards to CPI, DB economists think that given the 3% rise in seasonally adjusted gas prices, headline CPI (+0.37% forecast vs. +0.38% previously) should grow faster than core (+0.29% vs. +0.36%). This would lead to core YoY CPI falling two-tenths to 3.6%, and headline falling a tenth to 3.4%, both in-line with consensus. The three-month annualized rate under this scenario would fall by four-tenths to 4.1%, but the six-month annualized rate would tick up a tenth to 4.0%. As ever all eyes will be on whether rents finally respond more in keeping to the numerous models that have suggested they should already be well below where they currently are.

    For Wednesday's US Retail Sales, DB’s headline (+0.5% vs. +0.7% previously), ex-autos (+0.4% vs. +1.1%) and retail control (+0.3% vs. +1.1%) forecasts suggest some payback from a strong March release. There will be a few extra eyes on initial jobless claims this week given the spike to +231k last week after months of relative stability around the +210k level. DB economists think the spike could have been mostly due to NY school holiday dates having been shifted and would therefore expect much of the spike to reverse. We also have US housing starts and permits on Thursday which include a 2019-2024 seasonal revision which could be of note. Various regional factory surveys are out which will help fine tune PMI forecasts.

    Courtesy of DB, here is a day-by-day calendar of events

    Monday May 13

    • Data: US April NY Fed 1-yr inflation expectations, Japan April M2, M3, Germany March current account balance, Canada March building permits
    • Central banks: Fed's Mester and Jefferson speak
    • Earnings: SoftBank, Tencent Music, Petrobras

    Tuesday May 14

    • Data: US April PPI, NFIB small business optimism, UK Q1 output per hour, March weekly earnings, employment change, April jobless claims change, Japan April PPI, machine tool orders, Germany and Eurozone May Zew survey
    • Central banks: Fed's Powell speaks, ECB's Knot speaks, BoE's Pill speaks
    • Earnings: Alibaba, Tencent, Rheinmetall, Home Depot, Vodafone, Sony, Bayer

    Wednesday May 15  

    • Data: US April CPI, retail sales, May NAHB housing market index, Empire manufacturing index, March total net TIC flows, business inventories, Italy March general government debt, Eurozone Q1 GDP, employment, March industrial production, Canada March manufacturing sales, April housing starts, existing  home sales, Sweden April CPI
    • Central banks: Fed's Kashkari speaks, ECB's Villeroy speaks, China 1-yr MLF rate
    • Earnings: Cisco, Allianz, Burberry, RWE

    Thursday May 16

    • Data: US April industrial production, import and export price indices, housing starts, capacity utilization, building permits, May Philadelphia Fed business outlook, New York Fed services business activity, initial jobless claims, Japan Q1 GDP, March capacity utilization, Italy March trade balance, Norway Q1 GDP
    • Central banks: Fed's Harker, Bostic and Mester speak, ECB's financial stability review, Panetta, De Cos, Nagel and Villeroy speak, BoE's Greene speaks
    • Earnings: Walmart, Baidu, JD.com, Applied Materials, Deere, Siemens, Take-Two, Deutsche Telekom, BT

    Friday May 17

    • Data: US April leading index, China April retail sales, industrial production, new home prices, property investment, France Q1 ilo unemployment rate, Canada March international securities transactions
    • Central banks: ECB's Vasle, Guindos, Vujcic, Holzmann and Kazaks speak, BoE's Mann speaks

    * * *

    Focusing on just the US, Goldman writes that the key economic data releases this week are the CPI and retail sales reports on Wednesday and the Philadelphia Fed Manufacturing Index on Thursday. There are several speaking engagements from Fed officials this week, including an event with Vice Chair Jefferson and Cleveland Fed President Mester on Monday and an event with Chair Powell on Tuesday.

    Monday, May 13

    • No major economic data releases scheduled.
    • 09:00 AM Fed Vice Chair Jefferson and Cleveland Fed President Mester (FOMC voter) speak: Fed Vice Chair Phillip Jefferson and Cleveland Fed President Loretta Mester will take part in a discussion on central bank communications at an event hosted by the Cleveland Fed. Q&A is expected. On April 16th, Vice Chair Jefferson noted that his baseline “continues to be that inflation will decline further with the policy rate held steady at its current level, and that the labor market will remain strong, with labor demand and supply continuing to rebalance.” Vice Chair Jefferson also said that “if incoming data suggest that inflation is more persistent than I currently expect it to be, it will be appropriate to hold in place the current restrictive stance of policy for longer.” On April 17th, President Mester noted that she was still “expecting inflation to come down,” but that she thought the FOMC needed “to be watching and gathering more information before we take action.” President Mester will retire from the FOMC in June.

    Tuesday, May 14

    • 06:00 AM NFIB Small business optimism, April (consensus 88.1, last 88.5)
    • 08:30 AM PPI final demand, April (GS +0.3%, consensus +0.3%, last +0.2%); PPI ex-food and energy, April (GS +0.2%, consensus +0.2%, last +0.2%); PPI ex-food, energy, and trade, April (GS +0.2%, last +0.2%)
    • 09:10 AM Fed Governor Cook speaks: Fed Governor Lisa Cook will deliver a speech at an event hosted by the New York Fed. Text is expected. On March 25th, Governor Cook noted that while disinflation “has been bumpy and uneven,” “a careful approach to further policy adjustments can ensure that inflation will return sustainably to 2% while striving to maintain the strong labor market.”
    • 10:00 AM Fed Chair Powell speaks: Fed Chair Jerome Powell will take part in an event with European Central Bank Governing Council member Klaas Knot hosted by Netherlands’ Foreign Bankers’ Association. Q&A is expected. At the press conference following the FOMC’s May meeting, Chair Powell pushed back strongly against the possibility of rate hikes, saying that he thinks “it’s unlikely that the next policy rate move will be a hike.” He added that the FOMC would need to see evidence that policy is not sufficiently restrictive in order to hike but is not seeing that. Chair Powell also suggested that he did not take much signal from the inflation uptick in Q1, emphasized the “lag structures built into the inflation process,” and noted that he expected sequential inflation to slow this year.

    Wednesday, May 15

    • 08:30 AM Empire State manufacturing survey, April (consensus -10.3, last -14.3)
    • 08:30 AM CPI (mom), April (GS +0.37%, consensus +0.4%, last +0.4%); Core CPI (mom), April (GS +0.28%, consensus +0.3%, last +0.4%); CPI (yoy), April (GS +3.42%, consensus +3.4%, last +3.5%); Core CPI (yoy), April (GS +3.61%, consensus +3.6%, last +3.8%): We estimate a 0.28% increase in April core CPI (mom sa), which would lower the year-on-year rate by two tenths to 3.6%. Our forecast reflects a 2.5% pullback in airfares and net declines in auto prices (used -0.8%, new unchanged) based on rising inventories, mixed auction prices, and a pullback in incentives. We also assume another decline in communication prices (-0.25%) now that post-holiday price normalization has run its course; Adobe data also indicates falling prices for consumer electronics. We estimate a further slowdown in the primary rent measure (+0.37% vs. +0.41% in March) reflecting the continued softness in apartment inflation, but we assume continued strength in OER (+0.45% vs. +0.44% in March) given the resilience of the single-family segment. On the positive side, we forecast another large gain in car insurance rates (+1.6% vs. +2.6% in March) based on online price data, and we assume a 2bp boost to core CPI from this year’s tax preparation price hikes (within financial services CPI). We estimate a 0.37% rise in headline CPI, reflecting higher energy (+1.7%) and food (+0.3%) prices. Our forecast is consistent with a 22bp increase in core PCE in April.
    • 08:30 AM Retail sales, April (GS flat, consensus +0.4%, last +0.7%); Retail sales ex-auto, April (GS -0.2%, consensus +0.2%, last +1.1%); Retail sales ex-auto & gas, April (GS -0.4%, consensus +0.1%, last +1.0%); Core retail sales, April (GS -0.4%, consensus +0.1%, last +1.1%)... We estimate core retail sales fell 0.4% in April (ex-autos, gasoline, and building materials; mom sa). Our forecast reflects payback from strong Easter spending in March, as well as sequential softness in credit card spending across retailers and restaurants. We estimate unchanged headline retail sales, reflecting higher auto sales and gasoline prices. 10:00 AM Business inventories, March (consensus flat, last +0.4%) 10:00 AM NAHB housing market index, May (consensus 51, last 51)
    • 12:00 PM Minneapolis Fed President Kashkari (FOMC non-voter) speaks: Minneapolis Fed President Neel Kashkari will take part in a fireside chat at the 2024 Williston Basin Petroleum Conference. Q&A is expected. On May 7th, President Kashkari said that he thought “the most likely scenario is we sit here [at the current fed funds rate] for an extended period of time.” President Kashkari noted that the FOMC could cut rates “if inflation starts to tick back down or we saw more marked weakening in the labor market,” but that “if we get convinced eventually that inflation is embedded or entrenched now at 3% and that we need to go higher, we would do that.”:
    • 03:20 PM Fed Governor Bowman speaks: Fed Governor Michelle Bowman will speak at the DC Blockchain Summit 2024 in Washington D.C. Q&A is expected. On May 10th, Governor Bowman said that she had “not written in any cuts” for 2024 in the FOMC’s latest Summary of Economic Projections. Governor Bowman noted that her “expectation would be a number of months of progress, … and a number of probably meetings as well before I might be comfortable with” interest rate cuts.

    Thursday, May 16

    • 08:30 AM Philadelphia Fed manufacturing index, May (GS 9.0, consensus 7.5, last 15.5); We estimate that the Philadelphia Fed mane the economy and eventually get us to 2%,” but that he was not “in a mad-dash hurry to get there if all these other good things are happening.” President Bostic also emphasized that if “inflation starts moving in the opposite direction away from our target, I don’t think we’ll have any other option but to respond to that,” noting that he would “have to be open to increasing rates.”

    Friday, May 17

    • There are no major economic data releases scheduled.
    • 10:15 AM Fed Governor Waller speaks: Fed Governor Christopher Waller will deliver a speech on the payments system at the International Organization for Standardization Technical Committee. Text is expected. On March 27th, Governor Waller noted that he continued to “believe that further progress will make it appropriate for the FOMC to begin reducing the target range for the fed funds rate this year. But until that progress materializes, I am not ready to take that step.” Governor Waller also emphasized that “the strength of the US economy and resilience of the labor market mean the risk of waiting a little longer to ease policy is small and significantly lower than acting too soon and possibly squandering our progress on inflation.”
    • 12:15 PM San Francisco Fed President Daly (FOMC voter) speaks: San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly will deliver a commencement address at the University of San Francisco School of Management. Text is expected. On May 9th, President Daly noted that the policy rate was “restrictive, but it might take more time to just bring inflation down.” She also emphasized that “it’s far too early to declare that the labor market is fragile or faltering.”
    • 05:45 PM Fed Governor Kugler speaks: Fed Governor Adriana Kugler will deliver a commencement address at the Frank Batten School of Leadership and Public Policy at the University of Virginia. Text is expected. On April 3rd, Governor Kugler noted that her “baseline expectation is that further disinflation can be accomplished without a significant rise in unemployment,” and that “if disinflation and labor market conditions proceed as I am currently expecting, then some lowering of the policy rate this year would be appropriate.”

    Data Sourced from DB, Meta and GS

    Tyler Durden Mon, 05/13/2024 - 09:40
  40. Site: LifeNews
    4 days 17 hours ago
    Author: Joshua Mercer

    Sentencing hearings for nine pro-life advocates are set to commence Tuesday.

    The defendants – often called “rescuers” by fellow members of the pro-life movement – partook in a 2020 peaceful protest against a notorious Washington, D.C. abortuary that performed late-term abortions.

    Last year, all nine were found guilty of violating the controversial Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act. They each face a sentence of up to 11 years in federal prison.

    Senior Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotely will preside over the hearings, which are slated to take place at the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia just a few blocks from the U.S. Supreme Court.

    On Tuesday, May 14, Kollar-Kotely is scheduled to sentence Lauren Handy at 9:00 a.m., John Hinshaw at 10:30 a.m., and Will Goodman at 3:00 p.m. All times are in Eastern Daylight Time.

    Handy, a Catholic, is a well-known pro-life voice on the political left. She was the primary organizer and leader of the peaceful protest that led to the ongoing court cases.

    Click here to sign up for pro-life news alerts from LifeNews.com

    The sentencings will continue on Wednesday, May 15, with Herb (born Rosemary) Geraghty at 9:00 a.m., Jonathan Darnel at 11:00 a.m., Jean Marshall at 1:30 p.m., and Joan Andrews Bell at 3:00 p.m.

    On Friday, May 17, the judge is scheduled to sentence Heather Idoni at 9:30 a.m.

    Kollar-Kotely was also originally going to sentence the final defendant, Paulette Harlow, on Friday. However, Harlow’s sentencing was postponed until two weeks later on Friday, May 31, at 1:30 p.m.

    LifeSiteNews reported last week that “[e]ight of the nine defendants are being held in federal custody at the Alexandria Detention Center in Alexandria, Virginia, and the ninth is under house arrest.”

    “During their nine-month incarceration, several of the prisoners have already suffered serious mistreatment that meets the definition of torture both according to American law and international standards,” according to LifeSite:

    Heather Idoni, 59, was placed in prolonged solitary confinement for 22 days and deprived of sleep with the lights of her cell kept on continually. The mother of five and adopted mother of 10 was forced to appear in full shackles in federal court in March 2024 for a pre-trial hearing in a manner usually reserved for dangerous or violent criminals.

    Jean Marshall, 74, was deprived of sufficient clothing and heat during extreme freezing winter cold, resulting in the contracting of pneumonia, which went untreated for three weeks. She has been denied an urgently needed hip surgery, contrary to her physician’s instructions, resulting in excruciating pain and debilitating use of her right leg.

    LifeSite’s report added: “Paulette Harlow, 75, a devout Catholic, has been refused allowance to attend Mass at a Catholic Church while under house arrest despite her express request to the judge while in court.”

    Defendant Will Goodman told LifeSite that he is “trying to cultivate what St. Ignatius describes as ‘holy indifference’” as his sentencing looms.

    “I don’t care what happens. Whatever transpires, it will be an opportunity to try to love and serve and obey God,” Goodman told the publication. “I simply want to try to do my best in following His will. So whatever happens will be for my good.”

    In a column for LifeSite, defendant John Hinshaw wrote: “The fact is that from Thoreau through Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. all the way to the recent pro-Hamas demonstrations, NEVER have peaceful civil disobedience faced such legal violence as our federal law enforcement is now practicing!”

    He added: “From the abolitionists, the suffragettes, the civil rights movement, anti-Vietnam war protests, anti-nuclear protests, climate alarmists, and even the ‘mostly peaceful’ riots of 2020, NO ONE was threatened with 11 years!!!”

    Starting on May 5, Hinshaw’s niece Clare Hinshaw has been praying a daily Novena to St. Jude for her uncle and posting the prayer to X.

    “Uncle John’s sentencing will be at 10 am May 14,” the younger Hinshaw wrote on the social media platform:

    I’m starting a novena to St. Jude today that the Lord would soften the judge’s heart. I’ll be posting the prayers each day if you’d like to join me.  And, of course, any prayers for this intention would be much appreciated!

    On August 29, 2023, CatholicVote reported: “After a drama-filled trial, five pro-life advocates were found guilty of violating an almost three-decade-old federal law that has been used to prevent pro-lifers from exercising their right to free speech.”

    CatholicVote continued:

    The five defendants—Lauren Handy, William Goodman, John Hinshaw, Heather Idoni, and Herb Geraghty— were each found guilty “for conspiracy against the right to reproductive health services” and for violating the 1994 Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act.

    Lila Rose, president of Live Action, a pro-life organization, called the trial a “sham.”

    “This trial has been a sham with a biased pro-abortion judge who has made a mockery of our justice system,” said Rose. “This decision will be appealed, & we demand it be overturned.”

    The other four co-defendants currently awaiting sentencing were convicted later in the year.

    LifeNews Note: Joshua Mercer writes for CatholicVote, where this column originally appeared.

    The post Biden Wants to Put 9 Pro-Life Advocates in Prison for 11 Years for Protesting Abortion appeared first on LifeNews.com.

  41. Site: LES FEMMES - THE TRUTH
    4 days 17 hours ago
    Author: noreply@blogger.com (Mary Ann Kreitzer)
  42. Site: Ron Paul Institute - Featured Articles
    4 days 17 hours ago
    Author: Melkulangara Bhadrakumar

    A study by the Harvard Business School in experimental psychology relating to people’s tendency to “shoot the messenger” came up with a  startling finding that such human behaviour stems in part from a desire to make sense of chance processes. 

    Simply put, receiving bad news activates the desire to sense-make, and in turn, activating this desire enhances the tendency to dislike bearers of bad news.

    In the current churning around the Ukraine war, French President Emmanuel Macron and the UK foreign Secretary David Cameron fit the description of messengers with malevolent motives — Macron keeps  repeating his pet idea of combat deployment by European countries in Ukraine and Cameron arguing for the escalation of the war theatre to Russian territory. 

    Moscow disliked them both as bearers of bad news. But if further evidence was needed, the US national security advisor Jake Sullivan provided the “big picture” at the FT Weekend Festival in Washington last Saturday when he expressed the hope that Kiev would have the capacity to “hold the line” over the course of this year, and expects Ukrainian military to mount a new counteroffensive in 2025. 

    Sullivan will not rule out “Russian advances in the coming period” on the battlefield, because “you can’t instantly flip the switch,” but insisted that Ukraine intended to “to move forward to recapture the territory that the Russians have taken from them.” 

    FT added a nice little caveat “His [Sullivan’s] comments about a potential counteroffensive by Ukraine represent the White House’s clearest articulation of how it views the conflict evolving if president Joe Biden wins re-election in November.” Now, as things stand, that’s a big “if”, isn’t it?

    Meanwhile, Bloomberg reported on May 3 that the US “is leading talks among the G7 nations to develop a military aid package to Ukraine worth up to $50 billion, which would be “funded by the profits generated by accrued interest on frozen Russian assets.” 

    The US calculates that the Russian assets estimated to be around $400 billion, including assets of oligarchs, predominantly held by the EU countries, will generate windfall profits annually, which would allow for repayment as Western allies provide additional aid funding for Ukraine. 

    The US Congress last month passed legislation known as the REPO Act that would allow the administration to seize Russian assets held at American banks and funnel them to Ukraine. Moscow has repeatedly warned that it could lower the level of diplomatic relations with the US if Washington seized Russian assets. 

    Taking all these hostile western moves into account, the upcoming Russian military exercise held to practice the use of non-strategic nuclear weapons is anything but a knee-jerk reaction to some inflammatory remarks by Macron and Cameron. 

    The Russian ambassador to the US Anatoly Antonov called the training activity “a forced measure in response to the arrogant and aggressive policy of the ‘collective West’… unhinged strategists in Washington and their satellites in Europe must understand that in the escalation of stakes they are spurring, Russia will use all means to protect its sovereignty and territorial integrity. The West will not be able to play a game of unilateral escalation.” 

    The Russian Foreign Ministry statement on May 6 in this regard focused on the US’ intention to inflict a “strategic defeat” on Russia and announced an appropriate response in terms of stepping up the upgrade and manufacturing of intermediate-and shorter-range missiles and termination of Moscow’s “unilateral moratorium” on the deployment of these weapon systems as well as the future deployment of these weapon systems “at our discretion.” The statement viewed the transfer of F-16 to Ukraine as a deliberate provocation, as it is a “dual-capable” aircraft that can carry both conventional and nuclear weapons. 

    It highlighted that Moscow has taken “special note of the models of US-made ATACMS missiles, which have been recently sent to Ukraine and are capable of reaching targets inside Russia.”

    The statement concluded that the upcoming training exercise will convey “a sobering signal” — to the US and its allies that their hostile moves are “pushing the situation ever closer towards the explosive tipping point.”  

    The heart of the matter is that the US and its G7 partners are in panic mode. They lack conviction about Ukraine’s capability to disrupt the momentum of a major Russian offensive that is widely expected in summer. There is even a sense of dark foreboding that the Ukrainian military may simply pack up in the coming months. 

    Defense Minister Sergey Shoigu said last week that Russian forces are in full control of the battlefield situation and are steadily advancing along the frontline. In Shoigu’s estimation, Kiev’s military losses stood at 111,000 during the first four months of this year.

    In reality, therefore, the facts on the ground suggest that Macron and Cameron’s remarks fall more in the realm of hyperbole by two beleaguered governments staring at the impending defeat of their Ukraine policy. 

    In a reality check, the prominent Swiss military analyst, Colonel Alexander Votraver who is also Deputy Chief of Staff to the Chief of the Swiss Armed Forces’ Military-Strategic Staff and editor-in-chief of the prestigious Swiss Military Review (RMS+), put matters in perspective while speaking on the French TV channel, “The question must be asked: is the French army sufficiently equipped in terms of training and with modern weapons to contribute to offensive operations against a superior enemy? 

    “The forces we could move are two brigades of 5,000-6,000 soldiers, with a deployment duration of 1-3 months at most. But if we are talking about a longer term, as obviously in the case of Ukraine, it is only 2 battalions, which today are in the Baltic States and in Romania. The bad news is that these forces are absolutely insufficient to confront a half-million-strong Russian army.”

    Doesn’t Moscow know already what the Swiss colonel laid bare with brutal frankness? As for Cameron, his uncharacteristically belligerent remark about carrying the war into Russia was apparently some publicity stunt choreographed by 10 Downing Street, Foreign Office and Reuters in the run up to Putin’s inaugural ceremony in the Kremlin on May 7 and even as results were pouring in from the local elections in Britain that dealt a historic defeat for the Conservative party, which, with a general election looming, is being viewed through a national prism. 

    After Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman in Moscow Maria Zakharova told Tass that Russia has the right to strike British facilities in Ukraine or elsewhere if London’s threats about Ukrainian attacks with British weapons on Russian territory materialised, HMG reacted by expelling  Russia’s defence attache, imposing new restrictions on Russian diplomatic visas and removing diplomatic status from some Russian properties! 

    But Home Secretary James Cleverly announced in parliament that the UK sought to “make sure that we protect our ability to have lines of communication with Russia, even during these most challenging of times, routes for de-escalation, of error avoidance and the avoidance of miscalculations are really important.” What a humiliating retreat!

    Presaging the tides on the battlefield in Ukraine where Moscow is focusing, the Russian defence ministry announced on Wednesday military gains in the Kharkov Region. 

    RT commented that “The development apparently signals an intensification of combat on the Kharkov axis, where the front line… has remained largely static for months.” The final countdown for Russia’s summer offensive seems to have begun. 

    Reprinted with permission from Indian Punchline.

  43. Site: Zero Hedge
    4 days 17 hours ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    "I See Dead People": Bragg's Case Against Trump Goes Paranormal

    Authored by Jonathan Turley,

    Below is my column on the completion of the testimony of Stormy Daniels and the start of the testimony of Michael Cohen. With a dubious legal theory, the testimony has only magnified the criticism of the prosecution as parading sensational rather than material evidence before the jury and the public. Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg is losing even CNN hosts and legal analysts. Fareed Zakaria noted “I doubt the New York indictment would have been brought against a defendant whose name was not Donald Trump” Elie Honig has observed that, if brought in a less democratic district, “I would say there’s no chance of a conviction.” The Bragg case was never “normal” but last week it seemed to go paranormal.

    Here is the column:

    “I see dead people.” Before this week, that claim was most associated with the nine-year-old character Cole Sear from the 1999 film “The Sixth Sense.” But now it is one of the talents claimed by former adult film actress Stormy Daniels in her bizarre testimony in Manhattan during former President Donald Trump’s trial.

    It turns out that speaking to the dead was one of the few relevant things Daniels had to offer in the case, which is now on a collision course with a motion for acquittal before the case even goes to the jury.

    The Daniels testimony will live in infamy in the annals of criminal justice. For two days, she offered lurid and completely irrelevant details whose only possible purpose was to humiliate Trump. Admitting that she was coached by the prosecution in her testimony, it was clear that she was there not to win a case but to win an election. Judge Juan Merchan allowed this legal burlesque to unfold in his courtroom, later blaming defense counsel who had vociferously objected to her appearance and the scope of the examination.

    The cross examination was devastating.

    It shattered her laughable claim that she had not really been seeking money in shaking Trump down for a non-disclosure agreement, a claim contradicted by her own former lawyer. Daniels also revealed that she had spoken with the dead, and that a ghost had once held her boyfriend under water in a bathtub. She also said that she lived in a haunted house, only to discover later that the spirit haunting it was actually a large possum.

    In a case based on a dead misdemeanor and a rapidly falling heart rate on the manufactured felony, one can understand the appeal of witnesses who can speak for the dead.

    Indeed, Daniels’s graphic testimony may prove the moral high point of this trial, since serial perjurer and disbarred attorney Michael Cohen is scheduled to testify Monday.

    Cohen recently broke his pledge, midway through the trial, to stop attacking and taunting Trump. Cohen has insisted that he deserves the protection of the gag order by Judge Merchan as a witness, despite serious constitutional concerns. Merchan continues to threaten Trump with jail if he responds to Cohen’s unrelenting attacks. Merchan waited for the weekend before his testimony to suggest that the prosecutors tell Cohen to stop the public antics.

    But it remains unclear what the order is protecting Cohen from. Not only is he trolling for money on social media with reference to the trial, but he is also widely being attacked by others. It is only Trump who cannot address his attacks, including political opposition to his campaign.

    Cohen’s testimony will be the culmination of this travesty of a trial. But Bragg already jumped the shark with Daniels. After three weeks, legal experts are still debating what the crime was that Trump was seeking to conceal by recording payments for a standard non-disclosure agreement as a legal expense.

    (That is the same characterization used by Hillary Clinton’s campaign for its funding for the infamous Steele dossier.)

    It is still unclear that Trump even knew how the payments were characterized, and the alleged false record was not even created until after the election was over. Yet he stands accused of using the “false business records” to somehow steal or rig an election that was already over.

    After this circus with Cohen is complete, Trump will be allowed to testify.

    He would be insane to do so. Merchan has already said that he will allow a broad scope to cross-examination, making any appearance unlikely.

    That is when Merchan will face a key test of judicial ethics.

    He has failed to protect the rights of the defendant from a baseless, politically motivated prosecution. He could insist that he simply felt Bragg had a right to present his case. He will soon be done and, as expected, it is entirely based on Cohen, a disbarred perjurer who will ask for his former client to be sent to prison for following his own legal advice.

    After Bragg closes the prosecution’s case, the defense will make a standard motion for dismissal. Merchan should grant that motion.

    There has been no showing of an actual crime, let alone a clear record tying Trump to key decisions or actions.

    Merchan will then have to decide whether he has the courage that Bragg lacked. Bragg knew that this case was ridiculous. The Justice Department had declined any prosecution for a federal campaign finance violation, the theory referenced in the case. Indeed, it did not even seek a civil fine over the payments. Bragg’s predecessor had also rejected the prosecution.

    When Bragg took over, he similarly balked and stopped the move toward an indictment. But two prosecutors in his office, Carey R. Dunne and Mark F. Pomerantz, then resigned and started a public pressure campaign to get New Yorkers to demand prosecution.

    Pomerantz went even further and took an action that some of us viewed as deeply unethical and unprofessional. Over the objections of his own former office and colleagues, he published a book on the case against Trump — then still under investigation and not charged, let alone convicted. It was a pressure campaign directed at Bragg. In New York, Bragg knew that he would either have to indict Trump or forget about reelection.

    Merchan will now have to make the same choice in yielding to politics or principle…or to the paranormal.

    He has already allowed every effort to bring this dead misdemeanor back to life.

    But even Stormy Daniels may not be able to serve as  Merchan’s medium in reaching back eight years.

    Tyler Durden Mon, 05/13/2024 - 09:20
  44. Site: LifeNews
    4 days 17 hours ago
    Author: Ryan Bomberger

    Mother. It’s a word that invokes the deepest of emotions for both the woman and her child (whether biological, adopted or step). None of us would be here without her. Yes, her. There’s no question from which of the two genders we are all birthed.

    Every major dictionary (surprisingly) still defines mother as “the female parent”. The Oxford dictionary expands on this, saying: “a woman in relation to a child or children to whom she has given birth.” It’s a biological relationship that is wholly unique and differentiates female from male parents. The definition continues, describing a mother as “a woman who undertakes the responsibilities of a parent towards a child.” My mom chose to take responsibility for me – an adopted child whose purpose she would lovingly help unleash.

    Motherhood is everything yet is being reduced to a semantic nothing in our culture today. In an effort to degender language and erase what is feminine, a woman is referred to as “a pregnant person”, “a person with a uterus”, “a uterus owner”, “a birthing person”,  “a person with a period” or simply a dude. Sorry fellas, only She is She! (Check out my wife’s and my new children’s book here).

    Whether linguistically, culturally or medically, motherhood is being attacked. The very thing that provides all of us (barring situations of brokenness and neglect) with protection and loving care is recklessly disregarded and discarded. Pregnancy, for instance, is seen as a disease that needs the violence of abortion to remedy it. Motherhood is considered an inferior option to being a narcissistic celebrity or work-obsessed CEO. It’s viewed as an obstacle instead of an opportunity to become more than you ever thought you could be. (That slightly reworded quote is from my amazing wife, Bethany, who became a single mom in her late twenties as the result of an unplanned pregnancy). Planned Parenthood offers the exit plan: kill the clump of cells. I mean, there’s nothing special about a relationship between a pregnant person and the products of conception, right? The truth? Abortion harms women.

    Click here to sign up for pro-life news alerts from LifeNews.com

    What’s bizarre is at the same time our society tries to erase womanhood, it feigns outrage over maternal mortality. The same “feminists” who dismiss the value of motherhood, demand we do more to stop the (relatively small) number of tragic maternal deaths. Planned Parenthood leads this charge as they exploit maternal deaths due to pregnancy complications. Their final solution, of course, is to kill the child. They did it 392,715 times in their last reported year. Yet, Maternal Mortality Review Committees never recommend abortion as the answer. They do, however, heavily emphasize the need for prenatal care, something Planned Parenthood has all but aborted; it’s less than 0.1% of their services.

    Just to put things into perspective, in 2021 there were 1,205 maternal deaths in the United States within 42 days of delivery. (Keep in mind, some of these deaths have nothing to do with pregnancy.) That same year, there were 12,051 vehicular deaths of females. That’s ten times the number of maternal deaths reported. Yet you don’t hear groups-formerly-known-as-women’s-rights-groups crying for Automotive Justice! Should we all demand fewer women get in cars?

    Abortion numbers have risen since 2017. Maternal deaths have also climbed since 2017 from a rate of 12.7 per 100,000 live births to 32.9 per 100,000 live births in 2021. So, the argument that abortion reduces maternal mortality has always been a lie. Better healthcare does. But that doesn’t fit the anti-motherhood narrative where pregnancy makes women victims who need to be rescued by the violence brought to us by seven male justices in black robes. Wait. Isn’t that patriarchy?

    To be honest, our national stats are a mess. A recent Rutgers University study says that the CDC’s maternal mortality reports grossly overestimate the number of annual deaths. In 2013, for instance, the CDC included 382 of deaths of women over the age of 60 because the checkbox indicating “pregnant at the time of death” was erroneously checked. “The NVSS still misclassifies the deaths of many non-maternal and incidental deaths as maternal deaths,” the study claims. By the way, the CDC stopped reporting maternal deaths between 2007 and 2017 (thank the Obama administration).

    That being said, we can only go with the CDC’s statistics to give us an understanding of these avoidable deaths. In the end, it comes down to less than 1,000 (mostly avoidable) maternal deaths versus over a million (even more avoidable) abortion deaths. But don’t worry, fake feminists and their pro-abortion political allies constantly manipulate maternal mortality to justify abortion mortality. Vice President Kamala Harris has been doing just that since taking office (herehere, and here), saying: “I would challenge the hypocrisy of people who say they care about life and then ignore the maternal mortality crisis.”

    Pro-lifers don’t ignore maternal mortality. And it’s a tragedy, not a crisis. It’s why more and more pregnancy centers offer prenatal care. It’s why the American Association of Pro-life OB/GYNs (or AAPLOG) speak directly to this issue to dispel media myths and political propaganda surrounding induced abortion and maternal mortality. According to the CDC, these are a “small number” of events, and over 80% of them are preventable. Harris ignores these facts. Also, how does she address the “racial” disparity in maternal deaths but stands in solidarity with the leading killer of black lives – Planned Parenthood?

    Mothers nurture and protect. They don’t disinform and neglect. Sorry, Drew Barrymore, our nation doesn’t need Kamala to be America’s “Mamala”.

    So, the next time someone tries to sell you death as a form of combating death, reject it. The next time someone tries to tell you motherhood and womanhood can be repackaged to include men who can “become pregnant” and men who can discover their “girlhood”, reject it.

    But the next time your mother – the female parent who birthed or adopted, nurtured and cared for you – wants to give you a hug and tell you how much she loves you, fully embrace it.

    The post If You Want to Value Women, Value Motherhood Not Abortion appeared first on LifeNews.com.

  45. Site: Zero Hedge
    4 days 17 hours ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    Apple Reportedly Near Deal To Infuse ChatGPT Into iPhones

    Apple is nearing a deal with Microsoft-backed OpenAI to infuse its large language model, known as ChatGPT, into the future iPhone operating system, according to Bloomberg, citing sources familiar with the discussions. 

    The two sides have been finalizing terms for a pact to use ChatGPT features in Apple's iOS 18, the next iPhone operating system, said the people, who asked not to be identified because the situation is private. Apple also has held talks with Alphabet Inc.'s Google about licensing that company's Gemini chatbot. Those discussions haven't led to an agreement, but are ongoing. -Bloomberg

    Bloomberg reported a few weeks ago that the discussions with OpenAI had intensified. 

    In a note to clients on Monday, Wedbush analyst Daniel Ives "expect exclusivity around a number of...advanced OpenAI features on the iPhone that Apple will build around a broader AI strategy on iPhone 16 and iOS." 

    Last May, Apple CEO Tim Cook expressed cautious optimism about the proliferation of artificial intelligence services hitting the market, indicating that "there are a number of issues that need to be sorted."

    "We've obviously made enormous progress, integrating AI and machine learning throughout our ecosystem," Cook said, adding, "And we weaved it into products and features for many years." 

    News of ChatGPT potentially being added to iOS 18 comes ahead of Apple's annual Worldwide Developers Conference next month, where artificial intelligence is expected to be a significant focus of the event. 

    In markets, shares of Google in premarket trading fell nearly 2%, while Apple shares were higher by more than 1.5%. 

    Now, ChatGPT is set to become mass-adopted across iPhones worldwide - as long as the user updates the operating software. There are more than 2 billion active Apple products (iPhones, iPads, Macs, and other hardware devices).

    Tyler Durden Mon, 05/13/2024 - 09:00
  46. Site: Ron Paul Institute - Featured Articles
    4 days 17 hours ago
    Author: Ron Paul

    According to new reports from the Social Security and Medicare trustees, Social Security and a Medicare fund that pays for hospital expenses will both begin running deficits in 2035 and 2036. Disappointingly, but not surprisingly, Congress was too preoccupied spending billions more on military aid for foreign countries and banning TikTok to pay attention to the looming bankruptcy of the two largest federal entitlement programs.

    Many in Congress no doubt believe they can ignore the impending bankruptcy of Social Security and Medicare because they can count on the Federal Reserve to do the “dirty work” of cutting real benefits and raising taxes. This result can be produced via the hidden, and regressive, “inflation tax.”

    The Federal Reserve makes the debt-financed welfare-warfare state possible by monetizing the federal debt. This is one reason why, even though interest on the debt is now the third largest item in the federal budget behind Social Security and Medicare and ahead of military spending, there are so few in Congress serious about cutting welfare or warfare. Those few who seek real spending cuts in welfare are smeared as “heartless” while those seeking real cuts in warfare are smeared as “anti-American” by the uniparty.

    The government’s excessive spending and debt is leading to what some economists call “fiscal dominance.” Fiscal dominance occurs when a central bank must prioritize monetizing ever higher levels of government debt, giving Congress de facto control over monetary policy.

    The Federal Reserve’s purchase of federal debt will result in price inflation. It will also encourage more government spending by reinforcing the uniparty delusion that, as former Vice President Dick Cheney said, “deficits don’t matter.” The Federal Reserve’s inflationary policies artificially lower the interest rates, which are the price of money. The artificially low interest rates distort the signals sent to investors and entrepreneurs, leading to malinvestment. This creates bubbles resulting in illusionary prosperity. Eventually, economic reality will catch up with the Fed-created illusions and the bubbles will burst, causing an economic downturn.

    The next economic crisis will likely either be caused by or result in a rejection of the dollar’s world reserve currency status. Congress will be forced to make drastic cuts in spending while the Fed will be enabled to monetize the debt. This will result in massive public unrest potentially resulting in violence, the rise of authoritarian movements on the left and right, and increasing authoritarianism.

    The only way to avoid this fate is for a critical mass of Americans to demand Congress immediately begin rolling back the welfare-warfare state, starting with our bloated military budget. The savings from this can be used to help protect those currently reliant on government welfare and entitlement programs as those programs are phased out and the job of providing aid is returned to private charities, churches, and local communities. Congress should also rein in the Federal Reserve by passing the Audit the Fed bill, legalizing alternative currencies, and forbidding the Fed from purchasing government debt.

    Since the 2008 meltdown, Federal Reserve apologists have spent a lot of time saying that Audit the Fed puts Congress in charge of monetary policy while ignoring the fact that a real threat to the central bank’s autotomy is the growth in federal spending and debt. The goal, though, should be to abolish the Federal Reserve, not protect it. Those who truly want a monetary system free from political interference should join the movement to restore government’s constitutional limits and separate money and state.  

  47. Site: Zero Hedge
    4 days 18 hours ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    Nvidia Rivals Gold As Shield Against Inflation

    Authored by Edward Harrison via Bloomberg,

    The biggest US tech stocks are not only a bet on innovation but also a possible hedge against inflation, according to some respondents in the latest Bloomberg Markets Live Pulse survey.

    Gold, the haven of choice for decades, is still seen as the best safeguard against the risk of rising prices, according to 46% of survey participants.

    But nearly a third said the tech behemoths are their first pick for the role.

    Source: Bloomberg MLIV Pulse survey May 6-10. Respondents who chose `other' wrote in: bonds, cash, commodities, large caps.

    The response highlights the dominant role that companies like Nvidia Corp., Amazon.com Inc., and Meta Platforms Inc. are playing in the US financial markets as they expand their sway over major swaths of the economy.

    That has allowed them to generate steady profits, stoking rallies that are making investors confident that they will continue to be a source of solid gains.

    Inflation in the US has come down significantly from the scorching levels in 2022, but it surpassed economists’ expectations during the first three months of the year and has remained stubbornly above the Federal Reserve’s 2% target.

    That has left price increases by and large the biggest concern among investors.

    A majority of the survey’s respondents - 59% of 393 - cited resurgent inflation as the top tail risk facing financial markets between now and the end of the year.

    The next reading of the consumer price index is scheduled for this Wednesday and is likely to come around 3.4%.

    Nvidia, for example, has surged more than six times since inflation first rose past 2% in March 2021. Even Apple Inc., which has seen peaks and valleys, has outperformed the broader market in that timeframe, gaining over 50% to the S&P 500’s roughly 30%. Still, like other growth stocks, tech companies are sensitive to changes in inflation and interest-rates, because their valuations hinge largely on future profits.

    About a quarter of respondents pointed to a US recession as the top risk of 2024. In that case, Treasuries and not stocks would offer a better shield, the survey shows.

    Source: Bloomberg MLIV Pulse survey May 6-10

    The surprising resilience of the economy despite the Fed’s tighter monetary policy has kept cash flowing into the US, where bond yields are high and corporate profits continue to grow.

    The influx has been fueling a renewed rise in the US dollar, which is overwhelmingly seen as the best currency for weathering times of market turmoil.

    Almost three-quarters of the respondents said the dollar was the best haven currency, with the Swiss franc getting about 23% of the vote and the Japanese yen about six times less. Among respondents from the US and Canada, dollar got 86% of the vote, while in Europe, 43% of participants went for the Swiss currency.

    The yen has lost its haven status because of its depreciation against the dollar and due to Japan’s ultra-easy monetary policy, the survey showed. The yawning gap between interest rates in Japan and the US has sent the yen to the lowest levels since 1990 earlier this year.

    Gold is up almost 15% this year with the People’s Bank of China as one of the largest sources of demand. 

    With the confiscation of Russia’s dollar assets in the wake of the war in Ukraine, many countries are trying to diversify away from the dollar, with gold a natural beneficiary.

    Only 13% of respondents in the MLIV Pulse survey said that the search for geopolitically unaligned assets has benefited Bitcoin.

    Tyler Durden Mon, 05/13/2024 - 08:40
  48. Site: AsiaNews.it
    4 days 18 hours ago
    Milton Samadder, a 36-year-old nurse and founder of a charity for the disabled and elderly, was arrested after getting caught up in a media storm. Voices from the Christian community call for a fair and transparent investigation, urging the authorities to avoid sensationalising the case.
  49. Site: Zero Hedge
    4 days 18 hours ago
    Author: Tyler Durden
    Futures Gain With All Time Highs In Sight As Key CPI Report Looms

    US equity futures extended last week's solid gains when they traded just about 1% below all time highs, as investors awaited key CPI later this week that will shape the Fed's actions in coming months. As of 7:30am, contracts on the S&P 500 rose about 0.2% (but still below Friday's highs), after the index posted a third straight week of gains; meanwhile contracts on the Nasdaq 100 climbed 0.3% even though Alphabet dropped 2% in premarket trading after Bloomberg reported that Apple is closing in on an agreement to use OpenAI’s technology on the iPhone. Treasury yields dipped and the dollar was steady. In addition to the week's inflation data(both PPI and CPI) a handful of Fed speeches will also be in focus this week, including Cleveland Fed President Loretta Mester and Fed vice chair Philip Jefferson, who speak later in the day.

    In premarket trading, Alphabet shares fall 2% as Apple is said to be closing in on an agreement to use OpenAI’s technology on the iPhone. Amusingly, GameStop shares soared and on track for the best month since March 2021 after the first (rather cryptic) tweet by Roaring Kitty after 3 years of silence on the platform, has sparked yet another massive short squeeze in the otherwise worthless company, and is allowing Keith Gil to dump stock at a huge gain.

    pic.twitter.com/YgjVqtgcNS

    — Roaring Kitty (@TheRoaringKitty) May 13, 2024

    Here are some other notable premarket movers:

    • AC Immune shares jump 53% after Takeda signs a worldwide option and license agreement for the biotech’s active immunotherapies targeting amyloid beta, including ACI-24.060 for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease.
    • Cisco Systems shares tick 0.5% higher after losing its only negative analyst rating as BNP Paribas Exane upgrades to neutral from underperform, with limited downside now seen to consensus estimates for the networking equipment maker.
    • Incyte climbs 5.5% after announcing that its board approved a share repurchase authorization of $2 billion.
    • Intel rises 1.2% after the Wall Street Journal reports that the chipmaker is in advanced talks for a deal in which Apollo Global Management would provide more than $11 billion to help the company build a plant in Ireland, citing people familiar with the matter.
    • Penn Entertainment (PENN) drops 2.9% after BofA downgrades the casino and gaming company to neutral following what it describes as disappointing results.
    • Squarespace (SQSP) rises 13% after entering into a definitive agreement to go private with Permira in an all-cash transaction valued at approximately $6.9 billion.
    • Tencent Music Entertainment’s US-listed shares are up 3.5% after the online music platform reported first-quarter results that beat expectations.

    Ahead of Wednesday's all-important CPI report, all eyes will be on US producer prices due Tuesday. Data last week pointed to an economy that is slowing amid stubborn inflation, posing a challenge to the outlook for Fed policy.

    “We need a catalyst to break the range on rates or change our view on risky assets,” said Mohit Kumar, Jefferies Europe chief economist. “US CPI data this week could be a potential catalyst. Even though US data has started to show some signs of moderating, inflation remains sticky, creating fears of stagflation.”

    In Europe, the Stoxx Europe 600 index was little changed after posting its best weekly return since January (as we previewed just days prior) amid optimism the ECB is poised to ease policy as soon as next month. The autos and health care sectors led gains, while construction and utilities stocks were the biggest laggards. Among individual European movers, AP Moller-Maersk A/S jumped as much as 10% in Copenhagen after analysts at Citigroup Global Markets lifted their earnings estimates on the stock to reflect a recent rise in freight rates. Shell Plc rose to a record in London. Here are the most notable movers:

    • Maersk shares jump as much as 10% to touch a three-month high, as the shipping stock catches up after Danish markets were closed for holidays on Thursday and Friday last week. Analysts at Citi lifted their earnings estimates on the stock to reflect the recent rise in freight rates.
    • OX2 shares gain as much as 44% as private equity firm EQT is offering 16.4 billion kronor ($1.5 billion) for the wind park developer.
    • Gulf Keystone shares jump as much as 15% after the oil and gas producer operating in the Kurdistan region of Iraq demonstrated it can be profitable and generate cash from selling its output locally, according to analysts, with a key export pipeline still closed. This is reflected by the $10m share buyback announced this morning.
    • Diploma shares rise as much as 11% to touch a record high, the biggest gainer on the FTSE 100 index on Monday. The construction components firm reported solid results and upped its revenue and margin forecasts for the full year, while analysts noted a strong tailwind from M&A.
    • Nobia gains as much as 9%, the most in a month, after Nordea reinstated its coverage of the Swedish kitchen-interiors firm with a buy rating, expecting a recovery in construction market and consumer confidence to be a boon for the company.
    • NKT gains as much as 9% after Nordea “firmly” reiterated its buy rating for the Copenhagen-listed power-cable manufacturer, predicting that the continued electrification of society will be a huge boon for the firm in the coming years.
    • Almirall rises as much as 8.7% as the skin-health focused pharmaceuticals company delivers sales ahead of expectations. The beat was led by the performance of its Ilumetri psoriasis product. Meanwhile, guidance for the full year has been maintained.
    • Ceconomy rises as much as 6.2% after the German retailer of consumer electronics gave a better-than-expected profit forecast for the year. Baader Bank and Oddo point to Western/Southern Europe segment as a main driver.
    • Victrex shares drop as much as 5.6% after the polymer maker reported a 92% drop in pretax profit for the first half of the year due to high inventory levels and destocking among medical device customers. The firm has “a lot of work” to do in the second half of the year, according to Jefferies, which expects double-digit downgrades to 2024 consensus estimates.
    • BAE Systems shares in London fall as much as 2.9% after closing at a record high on Friday. The UK defense company was downgraded to neutral by analysts at BofA Securities, who see limited upside following the stock’s recent re-rating. That comes amid broader pressure on the European defense sector this morning.

    The euro-area economy will expand more quickly than previously thought this year as the bloc’s biggest member, Germany, exits more than a year of near-stagnation, a Bloomberg poll of analysts showed. The results capture the improving mood in the region, with first-quarter GDP readings surprising to the upside and inflation is receding toward 2%.

    Earlier in the session, Asian stocks were mixed with Chinese technology companies gaining ahead of earnings and the release of eco data this week. Hong Kong’s equity benchmark climbed to the highest since August, and mainland China equities also rose. But shares in South Korea, Japan and Australia fell. The MSCI Asia Pacific Index climbed as much as 0.3%, reversing earlier losses of as much as 0.2%, after reports that China is planning to issue ultra-long bonds to support its economy. TSMC, Alibaba Group and Tencent Holdings were the biggest contributors to the gauge’s gains. Mainland Chinese shares pared declines after initially falling amid concerns over an escalation of US tariffs and weak local credit data. Benchmarks in Hong Kong gained, with a gauge of technology stocks listed in the financial hub headed for its highest close since November. Taiwan shares also rose, while indexes in Japan fell.

    News of the China’s plan to sell ultra-long special bonds boosted sentiment after weak data from the country published over the weekend had led to initial Asian stock losses. The specter of further US-China trade tensions also weighed on equities with a report on how much President Biden is set to increase tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles.

    “You are looking at a slightly muddied growth outlook” for China, Sonal Desai, chief investment officer at Franklin Templeton, said in an interview on Bloomberg Television. Regardless of who gets elected in the US presidential election in November, we are going to see an escalation of US-China trade tensions, he said.

    In FX, the Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index edged 0.1% lower.  “After the dovish FOMC meeting and the soft April NFP sucked the momentum from the dollar’s upside, the question is whether price data can actively contribute to the dollar’s downside,” FX strategists at ING write in a note, adding that a softer PPI reading could point to a lower core PCE deflator figure, the Fed’s preferred inflation reading, due on May 31. This week’s data follows a US labour report earlier in the month which showed a slowdown in jobs growth and raised speculation that the Fed may start cutting the rate in the coming months

    Traders are betting on a 73% possibility that the Fed will start cutting rates in September, little changed from late last week; roughly 40 basis points of cuts are priced in through the end of the year

    In rates, treasuries are slightly richer across the curve, following similar gains for bunds and gilts during European morning. US yields richer by 1bp to 2bp across the curve with 10-year around 4.48%, about 1.5bp lower than Friday’s close, slightly underperforming bunds and gilts in the sector. Curve spreads are steeper by less than 1bp. Wednesday’s April CPI report is poised to provide the biggest test yet of the bond rally that started this month, when Jerome Powell swatted away worries that the Fed may raise interest rates; PPI data on Tuesday will also be in focus. Trading ranges narrow ahead of critical PPI and CPI reports Tuesday and Wednesday. A busy corporate new-issue slate is expected, with a weekly total of about $30 billion anticipated. The next scheduled Treasury auction is 20-year bond sale on May 22

    In commodities, oil gained on optimism China’s bond plan may boost growth, and traders assessed the willingness of OPEC+ to agree to extend supply curbs at its upcoming policy meeting. Iron ore and copper extended gains

    It has been a strong session for Bitcoin, climbing back up over 63k, while Ethereum is looking to reclaim USD 3k.

    Looking at today's calendar, the US economic data slate includes April New York Fed 1-year inflation expectations at 11am; retail sales and industrial production are also ahead this week. Fed officials’ scheduled speeches include Mester and Jefferson at 9am; Cook, Powell, Kashkari, Bowman, Barr, Harker, Bostic, Waller, Daly and Kugler appear later in the week

    Market Snapshot

    • S&P 500 futures little changed at 5,251.00
    • STOXX Europe 600 little changed at 520.98
    • MXAP up 0.3% to 178.02
    • MXAPJ up 0.5% to 556.98
    • Nikkei down 0.1% to 38,179.46
    • Topix down 0.2% to 2,724.08
    • Hang Seng Index up 0.8% to 19,115.06
    • Shanghai Composite down 0.2% to 3,148.02
    • Sensex little changed at 72,722.04
    • Australia S&P/ASX 200 little changed at 7,750.03
    • Kospi little changed at 2,727.21
    • German 10Y yield little changed at 2.51%
    • Euro little changed at $1.0777
    • Brent Futures up 0.3% to $83.04/bbl
    • Gold spot down 0.7% to $2,343.69
    • US Dollar Index little changed at 105.30

    Top Overnight News

    • China’s CPI rose for a third straight month in April, increasing at a pace of 0.3% compared with a year earlier, according to official data released Saturday, edging up from March’s 0.1% reading and surpassing the 0.2% growth expected by economists. Meanwhile, the PPI fell 2.5% in April from a year earlier for a 19th consecutive month of declines. WSJ
    • China’s credit in April shrank for the first time as government bond sales slowed, while loan expansion was worse than expected in a sign of weak demand. Aggregate financing, a broad measure of credit, decreased by almost 200 billion yuan ($27.7 billion) in April from the previous month, according to Bloomberg calculations of data released by the PBOC. That’s the first time the measure has declined since comparable data began in 2017, reflecting a contraction in financing activity. BBG
    • Chinese authorities have kicked off plans to sell Rmb1tn ($140bn) of long-dated bonds, as Beijing raises spending to stimulate the economy. FT
    • In the past three days, Russian troops, backed by fighter jets, artillery and lethal drones, have poured across Ukraine’s northeastern border and seized at least nine villages and settlements, ¬and more square miles per day than at almost any other point in the war, save the very beginning. In some places, Ukrainian troops are retreating, and Ukrainian commanders are blaming each other for the defeats. NYT
    • Iraq’s oil minister on Sat said the country won’t agree to any additional voluntary oil production cuts, although he expressed support for the overall OPEC+ alliance in more conciliatory comments on Sunday. RTRS
    • Stubbornly sticky rent is preventing the Fed from winning the “last mile” portion of its war on inflation and commencing policy easing. WSJ
    • Biden’s campaign considers Haley voters as a core part of its coalition in Nov, and has been heartened by the fact she continues to perform so well in GOP primaries despite being out of the race for weeks (Trump meanwhile has made little effort to court Haley or her supporters). Politico
    • McDonald’s is looking to launch a $5 meal plan in the US, a sign the company is becoming more aggressive on price to recapture market/mindshare as consumers dial back spending. BBG  
    • Apple has closed in on an agreement with OpenAI to use the startup’s technology on the iPhone, part of a broader push to bring artificial intelligence features to its devices, according to people familiar with the matter. BBG

    A more detailed look at global markets courtesy of Newsquawk

    APAC stocks were mostly cautious after mixed inflation and soft financing data from China over the weekend, although Chinese markets found some solace from China's plans to issue ultra-long treasury bonds.  ASX 200 was led lower by underperformance in the energy sector and amid a tepid NAB Business survey. Nikkei 225 lacked firm direction with price action choppy amid a slew of earnings releases. Hang Seng & Shanghai Comp were initially pressured after mixed inflation data and disappointing financing data which showed a rare contraction in Aggregate Financing, while expectations of increased US tariffs on Chinese EVs also provided early headwinds. However, the Hong Kong benchmark then recovered and climbed above the 19,000 level amid tech strength, while the mainland pared the majority of its losses as the attention turned to China's plans to issue ultra-long treasury bonds on May 17th.

    Top Asian News

    • Chinese authorities kicked off plans to sell USD 140bln of long-dated bonds, according to the FT. It was later reported that China's Finance Ministry is to issue ultra-long treasury bonds on May 17th in which it plans to issue 20yr, 30-year and 50-year treasuries worth CNY 300bln, CNY 600bln and CNY 100bln, respectively, while it plans to complete the issuance of long-term treasury bonds by end-November.
    • Country Garden (2007 HK) said it repaid onshore coupons within the grace period, according to Reuters.
    • BoJ offered to buy JPY 375bln in 1-3yr JGBs, JPY 425bln in 5-10yr JGBs and JPY 150bln in 10-25yr JGBs (reduced 5yr-10yr purchases from a previous JPY 475bln).
    • Australia’s government cut its 2024/2025 real GDP growth forecast to 2% from 2.25% and cut its 2025/2026 growth forecast to 2.25% from 2.50%, while it said inflation could slow to the RBA’s 2%-3% target range by year-end which is sooner than previously expected, according to Reuters.
    • Tencent Music Entertainment Group (TME) Q1 2024 (USD): EPS 0.13 (exp. 0.14), Revenue 0.94bln (exp. .91bln).

    European bourses, Stoxx600 (U/C) are mixed and trading on either side of the unchanged mark, in what has been a very quiet European morning. European sectors are mixed; Autos tops the pile, with optimism potentially deriving from Chinese CPI as well as new long-dated bond sales, which will help to provide liquidity for the Chinese markets. US Equity Futures (ES +0.1%, NQ +0.1%, RTY +0.3%) are very modestly in the green, following the tentative price action also seen in Europe.

    Top European News

    • UK PM Sunak is set to declare the UK stands 'at a crossroads' as he readies the Tories ahead of an election, according to FT.
    • Socialists were ahead in the Catalan regional election with 41 seats out of the 135-seat chamber and separatists Junts were second with 36 seats after 91% of votes were counted, according to Reuters.
    • S&P affirmed Poland at A-; Outlook Stable.

    FX

    • Dollar is modestly softer, having spent much of the European morning flat, with recent EUR strength pushing the index lower, albeit marginally so. Currently, the DXY is towards the bottom end of today's 105.36-20 range.
    • EUR is incrementally firmer vs the USD, catching a slight bid in recent trade though with specifics light. Currently holding around its 50DMA at 1.0786.
    • GBP is flat vs USD, with very modest early morning weakness petering out. Focus this week will be March’s job data, as well as potential commentary from BoE Chief Economist Pill.
    • USD/JPY is incrementally firmer, having wobbled very briefly after the BoJ said it reduced its purchases of 5yr-10yr JGBs. The announcement led USD/JPY to as low as 155.57, before quickly paring the move. As it stands, the pair holds above its 20DMA, with the high for today at 155.95.
    • Mixed trade for the Antipodeans, initially softened by the cautious risk tone in APAC trade and after the PBoC set a weaker reference rate setting. Weakness in the Kiwi, after inflation expectations, has led NZD/USD as low as 0.60.
    • PBoC set USD/CNY mid-point at 7.1030 vs exp. 7.2284 (prev. 7.1011).

    Fixed Income

    • USTs are a touch firmer but near unchanged overall as the benchmark takes a slight breather from Friday's marked bearish action but remain within a couple of ticks of the 108-21+ trough from Friday with last week's 108-19+ base below.
    • Bund price action has been very contained and largely directionless. Drivers thus far have been exceptionally limited and the European docket ahead is very light.
    • Gilts in-fitting with the UK docket thin today with the narrative much the same as for EGBs above. Gilts themselves in a thin 20 tick range after a very contained open. Currently around the 97.75 mark above the 97.66 low.

    Commodities

    • Crude benchmarks are on the front-foot, however action is modest and we remain within around a USD 1/bbl of Friday's base. Focus today has been on commentary from the Iraqi Oil Minister and awaiting updates out of Rafah. Brent July current holding at USD 83/bbl.
    • Precious metals are slipping a touch but with the action more of a gentle decline than a pronounced fall thus far. Specifics light and impetus from broader assets limited as overall market action is fairly contained; XAU near session lows around USD 2,240.
    • Base metals largely followed the fortunes of China overnight with initial action bearish on the overall soft tone and weak financing data from the region.
    • Iraqi Oil Minister said on Saturday that Iraq has made enough voluntary production cuts and will not agree to any future reduction taken by OPEC. However, it was reported on Sunday that the Oil Minister said the voluntary oil output cut is subject to agreement between OPEC countries and any negotiable proposals may be presented at the time, while he added they are part of OPEC and it is necessary to comply with any decisions made by the organisation. The state news agency also reported the Oil Minister said Iraq is committed to voluntary output cuts made by OPEC members and is keen on cooperating with members to achieve more stability in global oil markets.
    • Iraqi Oil Ministry launched 29 oil and gas projects within the fifth and sixth licensing rounds.
    • Qatar set June marine crude OSP at Oman/Dubai plus USD 1.75/bbl and land crude OSP was set at Oman/Dubai plus USD 0.85/bbl, according to a pricing document.
    • QatarEnergy is to acquire two new exploration blocks offshore Egypt in which it signed a farm-in agreement with ExxonMobil (XOM) to acquire a 40% participating interest in the exploration blocks.
    • Russian Deputy PM Novak said Russia will be able to increase fuel output in the future, according to TASS.

    Geopolitics: Middle East

    • Israel’s IDF said it ordered residents of additional east Rafah areas to evacuate and head to the humanitarian zone in Al-Mawasi, according to Reuters.
    • Israeli military spokesperson said Hamas has been trying to re-establish military capabilities in Gaza’s Jabalia and Israel is trying to prevent that, while it announced that Israeli forces in Gaza’s Zeitun killed 30 Palestinian militants. It was separately reported that Israel's military opened a new crossing into the Gaza Strip in coordination with the US government for humanitarian aid, according to Reuters.
    • US State Department said Secretary of State Blinken stressed to Israeli Defence Minister Gallant the urgent need to protect civilians and aid workers in Gaza and urged to ensure humanitarian access to Gaza, while Blinken reaffirmed to Gallant US opposition to a major ground military operation in Rafah, according to Al Jazeera and Sky News Arabia.

    Geopolitics: Other

    • Ukrainian President Zelensky said battles are ongoing at seven border villages in Kharkiv and the Donetsk situation is particularly tense, while Ukraine’s military chief said fighting is ongoing and warned of a difficult situation in the Kharkiv region, according to Reuters.
    • Ukrainian shelling killed at least 9 people and injured more than a dozen in an apartment block collapse in Russia’s Belgorod, according to Reuters.
    • Russian President Putin conducted a surprise reshuffle of top security officials whereby he removed Patrushev as head of the Security Council who will be moved to a new job and proposed that Defence Minister Shoigu become the new head of the Security Council, while he proposed economic adviser Belousov to become the new Defence Minister, according to FT.
    • Russian Defence Ministry said its forces have taken five settlements in Ukraine’s Kharkiv region.
    • Ukrainian drone attack has damaged an oil depot/power substation in Belgorod and Lipestk regions of Russia, via Reuters citing Ukrainian intelligence.

    US Event Calendar

    • 11:00: April NY Fed 1-Yr Inflation exp; prior 3.00%

    Central Bank Speakers

    • 09:00: Fed’s Mester, Jefferson Discuss Central Bank Communications

    DB's Jim Reid concludes the overnight wrap

    After perusing my social media accounts, I think I’m the only person on the planet who couldn’t find the aurora borealis this weekend. All I have to show for my efforts are a few black sky pictures on my iPhone. I had more success in finding a decent song at Eurovision which is saying something.

    The main thing that will light up the skies for markets this week will be US inflation data with April’s PPI (Tuesday) and CPI (Wednesday) the highlights. We’ll see if the higher-than-expected US inflation seen in Q1 extends into Q2 or not. Markets will  also hear from Powell (tomorrow) and Vice Chair Jefferson (today) as the highlights of a busy Fedspeak calendar that are included in the day-by-day list at the end. The next most important US data release is Retail Sales on Wednesday.

    Elsewhere China’s monthly activity numbers (Friday) are important, and staying in Asia, we also have Japanese PPI (tomorrow) and Q1 GDP (Thursday). In Europe tomorrow’s ZEW survey in Germany and UK labour market stats are highlights. Swedish CPI (Wednesday) may get a little extra attention after last week's Riksbank cut, only the second G10 currency to ease this cycle after Switzerland earlier in the year. Earnings season quietens with only 7 S&P 500 companies and 69 Stoxx 600 companies reporting.

    Previewing the main events now and let’s start chronologically with regards to US inflation. For PPI tomorrow, the headline (+0.4% DB forecast, +0.3% consensus, vs. +0.2% previously) and core (+0.3% DB, +0.2% consensus vs. +0.2% last month) are always less important than the key components that feed into the core PCE deflator – namely, health care services, portfolio management and domestic airfares. As our economists point out, whilst the March health care services print was relatively soft (+0.1%), the six-month annualised growth rate of 3.5% was still higher than at any point in the decade prior to the pandemic. They also highlight that with respect to portfolio management, the strength in asset market performance leading up to March should result in a strong print for April, given the typical lags.

    With regards to CPI, our economists previewed it in full here (see "April CPI preview & webinar registration"), and think that given the 3% rise in seasonally adjusted gas prices, headline CPI (+0.37% forecast vs. +0.38% previously) should grow faster than core (+0.29% vs. +0.36%). This would lead to core YoY CPI falling two-tenths to 3.6%, and headline falling a tenth to 3.4%, both in-line with consensus. The three-month annualised rate under this scenario would fall by four-tenths to 4.1%, but the six-month annualised rate would tick up a tenth to 4.0%. As ever all eyes will be on whether rents finally respond more in keeping to the numerous models that have suggested they should already be well below where they currently are.

    For Wednesday's US Retail Sales, DB’s headline (+0.5% vs. +0.7% previously), ex-autos (+0.4% vs. +1.1%) and retail control (+0.3% vs. +1.1%) forecasts suggest some payback from a strong March release. There will be a few extra eyes on initial jobless claims this week given the spike to +231k last week after months of relative stability around the +210k level. Our economists think the spike could have been mostly due to NY school holiday dates having been shifted and would therefore expect much of the spike to reverse. We also have US housing starts and permits on Thursday which include a 2019-2024 seasonal revision which could be of note.

    Various regional factory surveys are out which will help fine tune PMI forecasts. Over the weekend Chinese consumer inflation edged higher but producer prices stayed very weak. CPI came in at +0.3% YoY in April from +0.1% YoY in March and a tenth above expectations. PPI however fell -2.5% (-2.3% expected and -2.8% in March). So, deflation still remains intense in manufacturing sectors. Mainland Chinese stocks are lower with the CSI (-0.11%) and the Shanghai Composite (-0.09%) both trading slightly lower on prospects of more US trade tariffs on China across various industries with electric vehicles expected to be a particular target according to Bloomberg.

    Elsewhere the KOSPI (-0.28%) and Nikkei (-0.20%) are also edging lower in early trade. Meanwhile, the Hang Seng (+0.38%) is bucking the regional negative trend. S&P 500 (+0.04%) and NASDAQ 100 (+0.07%) futures are trading just above flat with USTs fairly stable as I type.

    Coming back to China, the government plans to sell the first batch of its 1 trillion yuan ($138 billion) of ultra-long dated bonds on Friday, ramping up its spending to stimulate the economy. The total issuance will include 300 billion yuan 20-year bonds, 600 billion yuan 30-year notes and 100 billion yuan in 50-year tenor and the bonds will be sold from May through November.

    Recapping last week now. On Friday we had a weak reading for the University of Michigan’s preliminary consumer sentiment index for May. The headline sentiment index dropped well below expectations, falling from 77.2 to 67.4 (vs 76.2 expected), the lowest level since November. Respondents’ view of current conditions also deteriorated in May, falling from 79.0 to 68.8 (vs 79.0 expected).

    Notably, the year-ahead inflation expectations rose from 3.2% last month to 3.5% (vs 3.2% expected), erasing all the index’s decline earlier this year. The 5-10yr expectation also rose from 3.0% to 3.1% (vs 3.0% expected).

    The University of Michigan release helped pare back some of the week’s upbeat tone. The upside in inflation expectations saw the number of Fed rate cuts expected by December decline by -5.1bps on Friday (-4.9bps over the week), erasing mid week optimism that monetary policy was heading to a less restrictive stance. Over in Europe it was a similar story, with the amount of ECB cuts priced by December coming down -3.2bps on Friday (and -5.0bps over the week) to 69bps.

    Off the back of this, US Treasuries sold off. The 2yr yield rose +5.1bps on Friday, and +4.9bps on the week. Similarly, 10yr yields rose +4.3bps on Friday, although this failed to fully wipe out the decline in yields earlier in the week, as yields ended the week down -1.3bps at 4.50%. Meanwhile in Europe, yields on 10yr bunds were up +2.2bps (+2.2bps on Friday).

    In the equity space, the S&P 500 had traded nearly +0.5% higher early on Friday before the University of Michigan survey but then gave up those gains, finally closing the day +0.16% higher. It finished the week up +1.85% in its third consecutive week of gains, the longest winning streak for the index since February. The NASDAQ followed suit, rising +1.14% last week (-0.03% on Friday).

    Moreover, global equities were also on the stronger side, as the STOXX 600 gained +3.01% (and +0.77% on Friday). The UK FTSE 100 hit another record high last week, supported by a strong beat to the UK GDP data for Q1 which rose +0.6% quarter-on-quarter (vs +0.4% expected). This saw the FTSE 100 gain +2.68% (and +0.63% on Friday).

    Finally, in commodities, oil prices lost ground on Friday, with Brent crude down -1.30% (-0.20% on the week) to $82.79/bbl, its lowest level in nearly two months. By contrast, gold was up +1.32% on Friday (+2.55% over the week) to $2,361/oz, its highest level in three weeks.

    Tyler Durden Mon, 05/13/2024 - 08:03
  50. Site: Novus Motus Liturgicus
    4 days 18 hours ago
    A splendid announcement to make in Our Lady's Month of May, and on this day dedicated to the Fatima apparitions!Roman-Seraphic Books has created a new edition of the Traditional Little Office of the Blessed Virgin Mary, in accordance with the rubrics of the St. Pius X 1910 reform. This edition seeks not only to preserve but to rejuvenate a venerable form of prayer that has been the Marian Prayer Peter Kwasniewskihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02068005370670549612noreply@blogger.com0

Pages

Subscribe to Distinction Matter - Subscribed Feeds