Pope Benedict XVI signals he was forced from power, in new Biography

Submitted by LocutusOP on Sun, 05/10/2020 - 23:39
Author: 


Ana Milan , From Rome Editor ,   Em S      

Date: 
Sunday, May 10, 2020 - 23:45
Article link: 
Pope Benedict XVI signals he was forced from power, in new Biography

 

Ana Milan
May 2, 2020 at 5:38 pm

 

I cannot understand why PBXVI would be so concerned about being rejected by the globalists. Surely that is what you’d expect if you were the true pontiff? He could have excommunicated them & put a stop to the CC being implicated in any way with them. If this would have led to schism then so be it – it would be they that would be the schismatics! Desertion should not have been an option as by so doing he has debased the Papacy, which I’m sure he didn’t intend, but that’s the outcome. His successor has added to that error by denying the title Vicar of Christ &, of course, denying the Deity of Jesus, the Abu Dhabi statement & introduction of paganism to the Vatican. He could have made a number of appointments to ease the day to day administrative burden without calling for a conclave, especially if he knew that such would not be in conformity with Canon Law or the rules set down by PJPII governing papal elections.

In order to stop this confusion which is tearing Catholics apart it might be prudent to allow PBXVI to either revoke his renunciation of the PO or to resign properly in accordance with Canon Law & call for a new conclave which would be transparently carried out in accordance with PJPII’s rules – without electioneering or promised favours. We cannot have two popes – neither a pope emeritus; it only plays into the hands of the Devil & has already shattered the Unity of the OHC&A Church.

 

...

From Rome Editor
May 2, 2020 at 5:53 pm

 

Ana, as I have said many times, read the article How Benedict has defeated Francis.

...

Ana Milan
May 3, 2020 at 9:22 am

 

He technically defeated Antipope F by a canonical trick which may, or may not, have been inspired by the Holy Ghost but which has left the Church devastated & good people without the leadership of Christ’s true representative on earth. Instead of preventing the catastrophe it has enhanced it as it has given a great excuse to those who didn’t like PBXVI within the prelature not to serve & those of little courage to join with them. As we all can see AF has appointed men of little or no faith who can be easily manipulated by him to positions of strength within the curia & the continued silence from those who should speak will, bar a miracle, ensure their evil agenda is carried through to its final conclusion.

It is very hard to see how the Papacy of the future can survive in the same format as it has for the past two thousand years. There will have to be radical changes in its structure. If AF has taken the power to do whatever he wants despite Canon Law & without any real opposition then one has the right to ask why didn’t PBXVI take the same power & mandate the consecration of Russia, TLM & reveal to us the entire Third Secret of Fatima while he was visibly acting as Christ’s Vicar?

We mustn’t forget that the watering down of Catholic Doctrine was promoted by all popes since VII & that this has led to AF being where he is, so to make the case that PBXVI was completely in the clear is not true. He has his own earlier writings leaning towards Liberation Theology & his inactions as Pope to bring back Tradition to the OHC&A Church which was ditched at VII to answer for. It will take generations to regain the trust & aura that has always surrounded the Pope & it is quite possible that the Papacy, as we have known it, will end with Benedict.

...

Em S
May 2, 2020 at 7:16 pm

 

Exactly Brother. Benedict XVI did not flee from the wolves. He struck them right where it hurts (the Munus), like the lightning bolt that struck St. Peter’s Dome. BOOM!

 

 

Own comment: 

It ought to be clear to anyone who has been following Bergoglio that it was a coup which forced Pope Benedict XVI out and installed that vicious unfunny clown on the throne.

The interview does not give as much away as Br. Bugnolo claims, however, and we ought not to expect it to come out from interviews which are obviously surveilled by the Bergoglio regime.