Final Declaration of Rome Conference Restates Catholic Doctrine and Answers the Dubia

Author: 
Date: 
Friday, April 13, 2018 - 22:15
Article link: 

 

 

    • Avatar

      Well and good, but... it would have been better if something like this was also part of the declaration:

      We are convinced that the Catholic Faith is being intentionally undermined by many prelates and clergy of the Church.

      We are convinced that the Supreme Pontiff has undermined the Catholic Faith by sowing confusion throughout the Church by his words and deeds, by his support of those who are deliberately undermining the Catholic Faith, and by his obstinate refusal to speak the Truth of Christ to the Church when he has been begged to do so by the Faithful and is ordered to by the very office he holds, especially when his name and office are being used by the unfaithful to undermine the Catholic Faith.

    • Avatar

      Yes that is key. Even many if not most of the pope supporters would agree with the declaration. Archbishop Chaput would agree with the declaration in one breath and in the next breath tell you, with a straight face, that Amoris Laetitia upholds everything in the declaration and that the Pope has done nothing to, as you say, "undermined the Catholic Faith by sowing confusion throughout the Church by his words and deeds." The schizophrenics like Chaput would not oppose one word of this declaration.

  • Avatar

    A huge one...a chasm, if you will...

  • Avatar

    Chaput, against all logic and common sense, apparently holds out hope he'll get a red hat from this heretic charlatan if only he behaves himself.

    • Avatar

      This is a judgement one must not make. While we can accuse prelates of certain things based upon what they have objectively said or done, you should not accuse Archbishop Chaput of earthly or ecclesiastical ambition because you do not see his heart. In fact, those who know the man see absolutely no thread of this in him. There is no objective proof of your claim and thus you might be guilty of calumny.

    • Avatar

      You're right, but I didn't make the judgment. I said 'apparently.' It has always appeared to me that Archbishop Chaput is not saying publicly what he knows to be true. His rhetoric is always 'this and that' as if he were hedging a bet. The views of a person who writes as often as he does should be clear and, in these times, emphatic. See Archbishop Schneider, for example.

 

Own comment: 

It would be better if it was not the same gang of resisters who oppose Bergoglio.

At least this time Cardinal Zen of Hong Kong joined in on a dotrinal matter, as opposed to only the political matter of Bergoglio's sell-out deal to China, in which he has unfortunately been the lone public dissenter. Otherwise it's the same old group of Cardinal Burke, Cardinal Brandmüller and Bishop Athanasius Schneider.

Let us hope this is the beginning of a Justice League of sorts to root out the Bergoglians from the Church.