No one is forced to be a Christian. But no one should be forced to live according to the "new religion" as though it alone were definitive and obligatory for all mankind.
Bishop Schneider: “Convert” or “renounce the papacy”
Submitted by LocutusOP on Sat, 03/04/2017 - 23:49
Author:
Dennis ,Ana Milan , Lynda , Caimbeul, crusader, Al The Silent, my2cents , AlphonsusJr
Date:
Saturday, March 4, 2017 - 23:45
Article link:
-
Ana Milan February 23, 2017
Possibly because Bishop Schneider is an Auxiliary Bishop from a relative outpost of the CC & not yet a Cardinal (which one day please God he will be) gives him more scope for speaking his mind in this forthright way. It is long past time that ‘niceness’ to this disrespectful occupant of the Papal Office was discarded. PF does not esteem the position he was questionably elevated to & has done untold damage to the historic view that the Vicar of Christ can only be judged by God. This held fast since VI in 1870 but now, given the completely inappropriate &, one might say, anti-Catholic disregard for such reverence given to this Office, PF has driven a great axe into the belief of Papal Infallibility. The disgraceful circus acts played out in front of him on the feast of the Chair of St. Peter is enough to turn anyone’s stomach. His denial to answer the Dubia & silence when Bishops use strong-armed tactics to force seminarians to comply with AL even if in doing so they commit sacrilege, says it all. He is, apparently, quite willing to see them leave the seminaries (worldwide) if they dare to question AL, yet as he signed that document he must own it & therefore must also be able to confirm what exactly he meant to bring about. If not, he displays his inability to uphold the True Faith & must be formally & publicly asked to resign.
Lynda February 23, 2017
The papacy is charged with the defence and proclamation of the objective, unchangeable Deposit of Faith given us by God’s Revelation and the Tradition of His Holy Church; and the governance of the Church for that purpose. A dictatorship is arbitrary and total control without objective valid authority.
...
-
Caimbeul February 23, 2017
“….or “Renounce the Papacy,”” indicates that Bishop Schneider believes that Francis is the Pope. He isn’t saying that Francis isn’t the Pope.
-
Lynda February 24, 2017
He still holds the exterior office of the papacy, even though he may have been a heretic/apostate for a long time (and thus not joined to the soul of the Church). For a visible office, visible action must be taken by visible authority in the Church.
...
-
crusader February 24, 2017
If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, then it has to be a duck; if somebody acts like heretic, speaks like heretic, then you know what he is. Don’t cheat yourself with some sophisticated theories, the horrible TRUTH is much simpler.
“But let your speech be yea, yea: no, no: but that which is over and above these, is of evil.”(Mt5:37)
-
Al The Silent Crusader February 24, 2017
I agree with you. I would add that Francis further condemns himself by not only what he says, but what he has written and attempted to pass off as official doctrine/dogma. For those of us who have eyes to see, and a brain that can process thoughts in a critical, analytic manner, we know that Francis is a public, manifest heretic. But, I get it. I am only a mere layman- not a member of the Catholic clergy. As such I cannot make this pronouncement. But I digress…
...
-
my2cents February 24, 2017
Francis the Hubris could never renounce the papacy. He is having too much fun doing and saying anything he wants without fear of consequences. Actually I think he loves negative attention the best because it empowers him to be a loose cannon. God bless Bishop Schneider, but his words have no impact on this miserable “papacy”. We need an army of Bishop Schneiders to invade the Vatican with an eviction notice.
-
AlphonsusJr February 25, 2017
An army of Bp. Schneiders would be woefully insufficient. Bp. Schneider refuses to speak directly. He’s milquetoast. We need an army of Abp. Lefebvres.
Own comment:
I can do little else than agree with my2cents, who writes:
Francis the Hubris could never renounce the papacy. He is having too much fun doing and saying anything he wants without fear of consequences.
He also seems to enjoy trying to send souls to hell and mocking the Catholic Church and the Holy Trinity far too much for a resignation to be plausible.
- Log in to post comments
Telegram Channels
Today's Mass
Traditional Liturgical Calendar
Tags
abortion
anti-Catholicism
anti-Christianity
anti-Russian propaganda
apostasy
Bergoglio anti-Catholicism
Bergoglio effect
Bergoglio heresy
Bergoglio homosexualism
Bergoglio idiocy
Bergoglioism
Bergoglio pontificate failure
Bp. Athanasius Schneider
CallMeJorge
Cardinal Müller
Cardinal Robert Sarah
Cdl. Raymond Burke
China
Church in Germany
Church revival
Covid19 coronavirus totalitarianism
culture of death
diabolical disorientation
DNC
Donald Trump
E.U.
EponymousFlower
euthanasia
feminism
Fr. Allan J. McDonald
Fr. John Hunwicke
Fr. John Zuhlsdorf
Fr. Peter Carota
Fr. Ray Blake
France
Germany
GlobalResearch
Gloria.tv
Gregory DiPippo
Holy Communion for lechers
homosexualism
homosexuality
intra-Church persecution
ISIS
Islam
Islamisation
Laura Wood
leftism
LifeNews
LifeSiteNews
Louie Verrecchio
Maike Hickson
marriage
Matthew Archbold
Michael Matt
modernism
Mundabor
Novus Motus Liturgicus
Novus Ordo
Novus Ordo apostasy
Novus Ordo filth
Novusordoism
Novus Ordo Missae
NovusOrdoWatch
OnePeterFive
papal heresy
papal piracy
papal scandal
persecution
Peter Hitchens
Peter Kwasniewski
political correctness
Pope Benedict XVI
Roberto de Mattei
Ron Paul Institute
Rorate Caeli
Russia
SSPX
Steve Skojec
StrategicCulture.org
Sweden
Syrian war
Tantumblogo
The Remnant
totalitarianism
traditionalism
transgenderism
Tridentine Mass
U.K. decline
U.S. circus
U.S. decline
U.S. militarism
U.S. roguery
Ukraine
Vatican II
Vladimir Putin
VoxCantoris
Western civilisation downfall
Western decadence
Western intervention
I don’t see how anyone can hear his comments and think anything other than what you say, Mr. V. He speaks the truth in more boldness, it seems, with each interview. So how it is that he (and others) can do so and not be exiled or punished in other ways by the current regime? Cdl. Burke was being ill-treated some time before the dubia. What’s the difference?