consecration to Virgin Mary

Some thoughts on the fake consecration of Russia about to take place tomorrow

As most Catholics will no doubt have heard, Bergoglio will allegedly consecrate Russia tomorrow the 25th of March, the Feast of the Annunciation, at 6:30 P.M. CET, I presume.

News broke on the 15th of March and I first heard of it from Kennedy Hall of the YouTube channel "The Meaning of Catholic". I believe he also does work for the Fatima Center.

Here was my immediate reaction after receiving the link from a friend:

If Bergoglio consecrates Russia and Ukraine then I am not sure it will be a valid response to the request. In fact, I fail to see how it can be.

I don't really know what's so difficult about doing what Our Lady asked. 

Russia means Russia, not Russia and Ukraine, not Russia and the world, not the world. 

Given that there are so many questions surrounding Bergoglio he is definitely not the right man to be doing this, but then again, God works in mysterious ways.

As my comments indicated, I was open to the possibility of Bergoglio actually consecrating Russia even though I have grave doubts about the man's character, Catholicity and office. I should have learned by now to never assume anything Bergoglio does is devoid of evil intentions.

As few days later, on the 21st of March, I learned of Bergoglio's intention to reform the Roman Curia, in essence abolishing it. He wishes to open up the Roman Curia to lay people, destroying what is at the very least proximate to Apostolic Tradition in the process. This was my reaction to that, writing in a group chat:

I commented  a while back of Bergoglio's trick of distraction and destruction in which he will distract with something which may seem Catholic one day then often within the same week do something which completely attacks the Faith.

I have now become convinced without any reasonable doubt. that the so-called Consecration of Russia is just another prop of the Bergoglio show, now in it's 10th diabolical season.

As Bergoglio has taken lessons from the secular world in distracting everyone from Covid-19 tyranny using the Ukraine crisis, Bergoglio uses the fake Consecration of Russia and Ukraine to attack the very essence of the Church hierarchy.

I have scoured my usual sources for information but nobody else but FrontLineTV seems to have picked up on it, which leads me to wonder where they got their information and whether Bergoglios bait-and-switch has worked....It turns out they got it from LifeSiteNews - their usual source.

In this short piece they explain Bergoglio's intention to reform the Roman Curia - in essense, destroy it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AMPpxIefTIk

The only thing we need to take home is that Bergoglio wishes to laicise the Church's hierarchy. So no longer will one have to be a bishop or even priest to head a congregation or dicastery. All of them have been demoted in terms of importance and placed under the political wing of the Vatican, which now has ultimate power.

Intention is very important in the Church's rites, rituals and Sacraments. You are going to work very hard to convince me that the same man who wants to destroy the Church's age-old structure and hierarchy cares enough about God to heed demands from Our Lady.

Even if he had done it in the manner requested - which he won't - his intention is obviously deficient.

So while Catholics are distracted with what must now be considered a fake Consecration of Russia the real story of the week from the Vatican passes by almost unnoticed.

It's classic Bergoglio and I am frankly disappointed that I didn't already conclude when I heard of the fake consecration that there would be a far worse story lurking underneath the headlines. He has done this so many times.

The good thing is that if you're been looking for dicasteries run by pink-haired Muslim lesbian transgender nuns, you might soon get lucky.

For ordinary Catholics though, this is absolutely horrible news.

It is, in essence, turning the Church's structures into just another bureaucratic arm of the U.N. agenda. 

This is the true Catholic news story of the hour, not the fake consecration which is currently garnering headlines.

The comment I had made a while back eluded to the Bergoglian tactic of saying something Catholic on Monday then something heretical by Thursday, for instance - although he normally course corrects back to heresy within the week. The semi-Catholic thing remains in the news while the Thursday statement is typically ignored.

I stand by those words. Whenever Bergoglio says something Catholic you can be sure that within a week he will say something horrendous, as this episode proved. Bergoglio is now using Our Lady as a prop in his circus act which is the Bergoglian papacy.

More proof of this was to come as the very next day, the 22nd of March, we learnt that he wasn't even going to consecrate Russia, but "humanity, especially Russia and Ukraine", to which I again responded:

So the fake consecration of Russia is not even a fake consecration of Russia and Ukraine, but of "humanity, especially Russia and Ukraine". 

Well, at least he manages to squeeze Russia in there somewhere.

So much for what I have written elsewhere thus far.

We have seen over the past 9 years of this demonic pontificate that Bergoglio has no respect for Christ, no respect for the Holy Family, no respect for Sacred Tradition, the teachings of the Church and in fact even a general God, never mind The Holy Trinity. That he would stoop so low as to invoke Our Lady as a prop to obscure the real story of the day, which is his Roman Curia reforms, makes him just as loathsome as they come. 

Yet I cannot help but see that people are spending column inches on this fake consecration of Russia which even on its face is not even that. It is difficult to understand how anybody can be fooled by...

The gullibility of Catholics when presented with false opposition continues to horrify me

There has recently been a coup in Bolivia. If you only get your information from more established news sources, or even most Catholic alternative sources, you are probably under the opinion that it was an overthrow by the people of a violent government, instead of a military coup.  You are mistaken.

I had certainly heard of the protests in Bolivia for a while but I did not expect them to lead to the overthrow of the government. It took me quite some time after the coup to realise that it was actually a military coup the likes of which the U.S. had unsuccessfully attempted to implement in Venezuela, but which bore much greater success in Bolivia when the army issued what essentially was an ultimatum to Evo Morales: Resign or be removed, or worse.

It shocks me not one bit that the established media has carried the line of the U.S. government - selling state ideology being its primary role, with the choice of whether to use a leftist or rightist lens seemingly being the only one left open to debate. What has shocked me is how positively the news of a military coup, the violent consequences of which are ongoing, has been received by Catholics who should know better. I am not talking about EWTN types, who get their news from Fox News in Catholic drag, but from those who at first hand don't seem to swallow every government lie unquestioningly.

As anybody familiar with Evo Morales will know, he is the source of the infamous communist crucifix with which Bergoglio was gifted on his state visit to Bolivia, I would presume. I believe Morales has also been at the Vatican a few times. He is the first elected indigenous president of Bolivia, or so I have been informed. I have also been informed that Bolivia is about 60% 'indigenous' - i.e., the majority - with most of the rest presumably being either wholly or partially of Spanish descent. He was a 'populist' figure in the true sense of the word, as proved by his multiple election victories. He had just won his 4th term, reportedly with the required margin of more than 10% which prevents a candidate having to have a run-off election. Under his rule, the levels of poverty drastically reduced and the native population of Bolivia was left much better off, in a country which had experienced one of  the  highest rates of economic growth in South America under his leadership, if not the very best. In other words, we cannot accuse him of having failed his base, unlike many other populists, some of whom are quite popular with Catholics right now.

Those are the facts. Now comes the conjecture.

I do now know whether the man is Catholic. Nothing of his public behaviour has implied to me that he is - his close relationship with Bergoglio would naturally imply that he is not Catholic, but he may well be. I do not know anything about Bolivia's record on the rights of the unborn, nor of Morales' stance on killing or saving them, and I have not bothered to look it up as it is not relevant to this piece. He is said to have lost a referendum on running for a 4th term yet ran anyway as the ban was ruled unconstitutional by the high court - or something to that effect. Regardless of that, his victory margin was well in line with the vast majority of polls ( I have read figures of 5/6 from one source). Whatever people may have felt at the time of the referendum, that he would win the presidential election seems to have not been in any doubt.

It is widely assumed that the CIA was behind this coup, and I have not come across anyone - for or against - who even questions this assertion. The fact that Donald Trump - himself somewhat of a victim of a CIA coup attempt - was one of the first to congratulate the new junta in charge, and the fact that Juan Gaido - the self-appointed president of Venezuela, a CIA stooge - also joined in should be enough to alleviate any doubts about who was behind it.

One would expect Catholics who claim to be against globalism and in favour of nationalism and populism to support a man who was obviously popular in his own country, and who had obviously improved the economic conditions of the poorest sections of his country. Yet, that is not what seems to have happened. Here is where the dreaded pachamama comes in.

It has been reported that one of the leaders of the coup declared “Pachamama will never return”, which was evidently enough to get Catholics on the bandwagon . Then we had the self-declared president posing with what seems to be to be a liturgical book and what is reported to be the Gospels, and that was enough for others to give jump over to her side. Even Gloria.tv, which is generally against americanist interventions and American imperialism, has not criticised what is obviously an externally-orchestrated coup and has reported on the anti-Pachamama statements and the holding-the-Gospels show without much question or suspicion.

It seems that Catholics, even those against NOChurch, are quite easily fooled. All you need to do is utter some words against pagan statues, and hold a liturgical book, and all of a sudden you will have even battle-hardened Catholics jumping for a coup like a bitch in heat. To me though, the ostentatious anti-paganism is in and of itself a mark of the whole thing being plotted from abroad.

What seems obvious to me is that the coup plotters would have been following what happened at the syond of the Amazon. They would know that a lot of Catholics would have been against pachamama. They would have known that it was a trending word so they had one of their guys stand in front of a camera and say something against...

Subscribe to consecration to Virgin Mary