church architecture

There are many problems with sedevacantism, but the major one is assuming that a Pope has to be faultless. The Pope is a sinner, just like the rest of us, and part of the problem with sedevacantism is that it rests on the assumption that a Pope who has faults cannot be a legitimate Pope,  which is of course, non-sense and goes against much of what the Church teaches with regards to sin and concupiscence.

The secular awards just keep piling up on Pope Francis, who has evidently been named Fortune Magazines top world leader. From the small excerpt contained in the article, it is clear they don't much understand anything about either the Catholic Church or the Catholic faith, or the history of the Catholic Church. Nonetheless, I am curious as to how they define leadership.