Bergoglio priorities

Some thoughts on the fake consecration of Russia about to take place tomorrow

As most Catholics will no doubt have heard, Bergoglio will allegedly consecrate Russia tomorrow the 25th of March, the Feast of the Annunciation, at 6:30 P.M. CET, I presume.

News broke on the 15th of March and I first heard of it from Kennedy Hall of the YouTube channel "The Meaning of Catholic". I believe he also does work for the Fatima Center.

Here was my immediate reaction after receiving the link from a friend:

If Bergoglio consecrates Russia and Ukraine then I am not sure it will be a valid response to the request. In fact, I fail to see how it can be.

I don't really know what's so difficult about doing what Our Lady asked. 

Russia means Russia, not Russia and Ukraine, not Russia and the world, not the world. 

Given that there are so many questions surrounding Bergoglio he is definitely not the right man to be doing this, but then again, God works in mysterious ways.

As my comments indicated, I was open to the possibility of Bergoglio actually consecrating Russia even though I have grave doubts about the man's character, Catholicity and office. I should have learned by now to never assume anything Bergoglio does is devoid of evil intentions.

As few days later, on the 21st of March, I learned of Bergoglio's intention to reform the Roman Curia, in essence abolishing it. He wishes to open up the Roman Curia to lay people, destroying what is at the very least proximate to Apostolic Tradition in the process. This was my reaction to that, writing in a group chat:

I commented  a while back of Bergoglio's trick of distraction and destruction in which he will distract with something which may seem Catholic one day then often within the same week do something which completely attacks the Faith.

I have now become convinced without any reasonable doubt. that the so-called Consecration of Russia is just another prop of the Bergoglio show, now in it's 10th diabolical season.

As Bergoglio has taken lessons from the secular world in distracting everyone from Covid-19 tyranny using the Ukraine crisis, Bergoglio uses the fake Consecration of Russia and Ukraine to attack the very essence of the Church hierarchy.

I have scoured my usual sources for information but nobody else but FrontLineTV seems to have picked up on it, which leads me to wonder where they got their information and whether Bergoglios bait-and-switch has worked....It turns out they got it from LifeSiteNews - their usual source.

In this short piece they explain Bergoglio's intention to reform the Roman Curia - in essense, destroy it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AMPpxIefTIk

The only thing we need to take home is that Bergoglio wishes to laicise the Church's hierarchy. So no longer will one have to be a bishop or even priest to head a congregation or dicastery. All of them have been demoted in terms of importance and placed under the political wing of the Vatican, which now has ultimate power.

Intention is very important in the Church's rites, rituals and Sacraments. You are going to work very hard to convince me that the same man who wants to destroy the Church's age-old structure and hierarchy cares enough about God to heed demands from Our Lady.

Even if he had done it in the manner requested - which he won't - his intention is obviously deficient.

So while Catholics are distracted with what must now be considered a fake Consecration of Russia the real story of the week from the Vatican passes by almost unnoticed.

It's classic Bergoglio and I am frankly disappointed that I didn't already conclude when I heard of the fake consecration that there would be a far worse story lurking underneath the headlines. He has done this so many times.

The good thing is that if you're been looking for dicasteries run by pink-haired Muslim lesbian transgender nuns, you might soon get lucky.

For ordinary Catholics though, this is absolutely horrible news.

It is, in essence, turning the Church's structures into just another bureaucratic arm of the U.N. agenda. 

This is the true Catholic news story of the hour, not the fake consecration which is currently garnering headlines.

The comment I had made a while back eluded to the Bergoglian tactic of saying something Catholic on Monday then something heretical by Thursday, for instance - although he normally course corrects back to heresy within the week. The semi-Catholic thing remains in the news while the Thursday statement is typically ignored.

I stand by those words. Whenever Bergoglio says something Catholic you can be sure that within a week he will say something horrendous, as this episode proved. Bergoglio is now using Our Lady as a prop in his circus act which is the Bergoglian papacy.

More proof of this was to come as the very next day, the 22nd of March, we learnt that he wasn't even going to consecrate Russia, but "humanity, especially Russia and Ukraine", to which I again responded:

So the fake consecration of Russia is not even a fake consecration of Russia and Ukraine, but of "humanity, especially Russia and Ukraine". 

Well, at least he manages to squeeze Russia in there somewhere.

So much for what I have written elsewhere thus far.

We have seen over the past 9 years of this demonic pontificate that Bergoglio has no respect for Christ, no respect for the Holy Family, no respect for Sacred Tradition, the teachings of the Church and in fact even a general God, never mind The Holy Trinity. That he would stoop so low as to invoke Our Lady as a prop to obscure the real story of the day, which is his Roman Curia reforms, makes him just as loathsome as they come. 

Yet I cannot help but see that people are spending column inches on this fake consecration of Russia which even on its face is not even that. It is difficult to understand how anybody can be fooled by...

A review of my article on Donald J. Trump written on the eve of the 2016 U.S. election, previewing this one

I shall attempt to briefly review the article I wrote on the eve of the last U.S. presidential election in 2016, and see how my expectations of candidate Trump compare with president Trump. It was difficult to understand why I titled it "There is none that calleth upon justice, neither is there any one that judgeth truly...". However, it didn't take me long to realise that I was in the phase of titling all my articles after Bible quotes. That didn't last long, sadly, but I might well pick it up again.

The quotes seem to have been directed at the U.S. bishops, for their attempts to muddy what should have been quite a clear option between a candidate who professed a preference for very many good things and had no intrinsic evils in his campaign platform, and one who promised all sorts of intrinsic evils in her campain, with none of the goods that Trump had.

Everything I wrote about Hillary Clinton applies equally to Joe Biden, except with Biden we have the extra scandal of him being Catholic. He is, of course, not Catholic in any meaningful sense, but as he has not been excommunicated and was baptised Catholic, we have to live with the fact that he can identify as such, as indeed can Bergoglio. That is what makes both Biden's and Bergoglio's preferences for perversions and evils that much more condemnable, and damnable.

In the article was a list of top 10 reasons to vote for Donald J. Trump. He won the elections, as it turned out. I rather expected him to do it, and truth be told I am even more confident that he will win it this time, once again defying the polls which seem even more fake this time than they did the last. As little enthuasiasm as there was for Clinton, there virtually none for Biden. At least she had the novelty of being the first female presidential candidate. With Biden, all they can muster is "At least he's not Trump." I do not dismiss that those who hate Trump do it fervently, but it is difficult to see how it translates into waiting in line possibly for hours, and possibly in the rain, in order to vote for a man one more than likely finds distasteful. In just over a day or so, we shall see if the disgust for Trump among the anti-Trumper's translates into votes for creey Joe and his ghoulish running mate.

For full disclosure, I must preface this by writing that I am not a particularly big fan of Donald Trump, though I do find him amusing. I am definitely not a NeverTrumper, but nor am I an AlwaysTrumper. I am, however, a NeverBiden, and cannot fathom what would ever possess me to vote for a man as morally distasteful as Biden. In other words, I think I can offer a relatively dispassionate analysis of Trump's record.

So, what will follow is a walk-through of my 10 points with grades on how right I was compared to Donald Trump's actual record. Given Trump's erratic nature and lack of interest in details, it can be difficult to know just how much blame or credit we can give him for his record. Still, he appoints his underlings and signs off on the checks, the bombings and the priorities. His record belongs to him, and if nothing else, it allows us to see where his priorities lie, whether he has met success in his endeavours or not.

The points will be in bold text, with the score next, and the analysis below. Mind you, this is an analysis of how I predicted, or thought I understeood, candidate Trump's versus how president Trump has actually done. Of course, my analysis has do do with his campaign pledges, so it cannot be entirely divorced from what he actually pledged, but still, it is not a grade of how president Trump has succeeded versus some impeccable standard of perfection.

1. Donald Trump  is not a career politician. He is a man who has built a fortune on hard work and taking risks, and done a good job at it. In fact, he has managed doing what I would argue 99.999% of the world wants to do in a much better way than 99.999% of the world has managed. (7/10)

More of a statement of fact than anything else and hardly gradeable. I would define a career politician as someone willing to do anything and rid himself of any principle to get to the very top, regardless of whether it is good for his country or not. That would score a 0, so 7/10 means I think Trump has not behaved as a career politican would. Sadly, however, on many of the big decisions - big banking, military-industrial complex, continuing wars - he has toed the line of the political schemers.

He has still managed to incur the wrath of many of the right people, and often by being unconventional, so I'll give him a pretty high grade and conclude that I was right in claiming that he didn't behave as a career politican.

2. The man seems genuine. When he speaks, one gets the impression that he means what he says, and not that he is saying it because pollsters told him it would be good to do so. (5/10)

If Trump had not shut the country down in March, he would probably have got an 8 on this point. However, shutting down a country on account of a 'pandemic' he obviously did not believe was going around simply because he thought it more politically expedient to do so will in many ways come to become his defining moment - at least of his first term, if he should lose the re-election bid.

The one good thing about Trump is that he is not a particularly convincing liar when reading off a script. It has therefore been quite easy...

Pages

Subscribe to Bergoglio priorities