Vatican Forcing Communion on the Tongue -- But the Proud Resist

Author: 

 

Ana Milan, JoeA, Anonymous, JBQ John Kennedy 

Date: 
Thursday, June 21, 2018 - 23:45
Article link: 

 

 

Recently I witnessed a man in front of me stoop to retrieve the Sacred Host which the priest had dropped while offering it to him in the hand. The priest just put it back into the ciborium & gave him another. I presume the dropped Host would be offered to some other unsuspecting person but he was careful it wasn't me as I receive on the tongue.

 ...

About thirty years ago when I still went to the NO Mass,
I was in a rural parish in Georgia at a Sunday Mass and the priest dropped a Host during Communion and just left it there on the floor until it was convenient for him to pick it up.I have witnessed many other horrific stories like this. May God have Mercy on His Church!

...

Unknown at 11:45 am is correct. They are members of the Sistine Choir. They dress as priests in amaranth red cassocks similar to monsignori. That has been their traditional dress in Papal choir since the Italian Renaissance(believe it or not). But they are laymen.
I doubt of Francis gives a damn. He doesn't kneel at the Consecration, and will not participate in the annual Papal procession with the Blessed Sacrament on Corpus Christi.
I think this is some good Cardinal's doing, someone from the reign of Benedict XVI.
Francis would rather speak about the plight of Muslim immigrants (like last week), that concern himself with any disrespect towards Our Lord Jesus Christ in the Holy Eucharist.
Damian Malliapalli

...

JoeA:

Just to share a similar story with you, when I was in college as a junior ten years ago, I went to a Mass, invited by a friend. It was sponsored by what was called the Spirit of Light group. I thought the name weird at the time, but went anyway.
When I went into this parlor(not a church), where the Mass was being held, everyone was sitting on the floor on pillows. The "altar" was a coffee table. The priest dressed in a beige flannel shirt snd jeans with a purple stole around his neck. He was about 68-70. He was a Jesuit.
The priest ad libbed the whole Mass including the Consecration. When it came time for Communion, everyone received in the hand (including me...unfortunately), but when they passed around the Chalice with no respect (it sloshed around in the cup and splattered on the rug) I was shocked. It was like they were passing round a mug of beer for everyone to share. When the chalice was passed to me, I declined to drink from it, but took a tissue from my pocket to try to wipe some of the Precious Blood that was dribbling down the cup. As I was doing this, one of the girls who had sponsored this "Mass" whispered, "Hurry up!" to me. I handed off the chalice to the next person, and gave the tissue to the priest after Mass, explaining what I had done. He shoved the tissue in his pocket, and I am sure he threw it away.
Needless to say, I never went to another one of their MAsses. Around that time, I started reading about the TLM.
The priest is retired now, and the group on campus is gone. But their damage was done. Your experience was 30+ years ago, mine was 10. And I'm sure that same things go on today....and probably worse.
Damian Malliapalli

Reply

Replies
 
  • There are viable rumors that a new Mass of unity is being prepared which will not have a Consecration.

  • It wasn't Precious Blood nor the Sacred Body at that sham, so don't worry. You could have gargled from the chalice or sent out a stream through your front teeth at hit the hippie between the eyes and would have committed no sacrilege.

    On a side note, you seem to be differentiating between the Body and Blood; Christ's Body and Blood are equally present BOTH in the Host and also Christ's Body and Blood are equally present BOTH in the Chalice.
    In other words, you're not receiving only His Body in the Host and only His Blood in the Chalice. That's heresy to believe that, and this is exactly why the practice of receiving from the Chalice has been condemned, because it fosters the heresy.

  • "It wasn't Precious Blood nor the Sacred Body...." so "no sacrilege."
    Not true. To mock/pretend the sacrament and then falsely accept it and worship it as God is sacrilege.

  • The author did not mock or pretend anything, and went along in good faith, even showing reverence. That's the point. His or her conscience is clear. And there was no Sacrament.
    The Jesuit committed blasphemy but we already know that's SOP for that lot.