The nine lives of Msgr. Dario Edoardo Viganò

Author: 

SOL, Charles E FlynnFather Peter StravinskasSteve Seitz, Robert Brown, just another Catholic... , Johann du Toit , James,  Joseph,Ranger01, Arthur McGowan          

Date: 
Sunday, September 8, 2019 - 23:00
Article link: 

 

 


  1. Dysfunction that goes all the way to the top.

 

...

 


  • XI: Thou shalt not be on the wrong side of the AP’s ethical standards for news photography.


    • Father Peter Stravinskas

      August 31, 2019 at 8:03 pm

      Has there ever been a pontificate in the modern era serving as the greatest magnet for corruption? The Sicilian proverb is apt: Fish rots from the head!


      • Fr. Stravinskas,
        They say that Pope Francis was elected to reform the curia. I guess the electors didn’t specify whether he was to reform it in holiness or in corruption.


      • Not to defend Francis, but it was JPII who named Bernardin to Chicago.
        Later, it was McCarrick to head Metuchen, then Newark, then DC (with a redhat). And it was his hand picked Sec of State, Sodano, who protected Maciel.

        It was Paul VI who promulgated a highly Protestantized mass, and strong armed priests to make sure it was said versus populum in the vernacular. And the great punch line was canonizing him. Whatever happened to the necessity of Pastoral Prudence in the holiness of a pastor? Or a pope keeping his word (cf Cardinal Mindszenty)?

 

...

 


  • As John Zmirak noted, we have a Renaissance Papacy. All the same financial corruption, scheming and sexual misconduct, but sadly without any of the art (and no, that blasphemous pornographic mural that Archbishop Paglia commissioned in his Cathedral does not deserve to be called “art”). No wonder Gregg Burke resigned as the Vatican’s head of communications; he clearly concluded he could not spin what is unfolding.

...

 


  • “Teatro Francesco” is so extensive and dense one can be excused for allowing “lettergate” to slip
    from awareness. Ah, I do now remember that matchless howl from the guts as I read “…a new 11-volume set of books on the theology of Pope Francis…”
    That was a good one.
    Eleven volumes!
    On theology!
    Doubtful he could independently produce eleven sentences on his preferred perspective of third world Marxist social analysis. Yet I should not jump to judgement. Who can yet determine what the Anaconda Synod will inspire?
    Nevertheless this display of Bergoglian nepotism does seem to have moved the earth under the feet of the “Crux” arm of the fan club. Even John Allen perceives the shameless absurdity to some extent. The ascent of Viganò “the less” serves at least the purpose of rallying to marginal awareness those subsumed in the Bergoglian opioid. It is perhaps the best we can expect before they slip into jungle fever.
    Can we look forward to the editorial staff of Crux and checkbook Carl Anderson and his Knights of Columbus sporting safari attire come October?

...

 


  • Our story begins in Buenos Aires, with a little boy who had a dream of blending the “conservative” pieties of old women, the rhetoric and dance moves of Juan Peron…and as required…varieties of materialism. What ultimately worked best for him and summed it all up? Machiavelli!…a name that sounded delicious to him and yes, he liked his pasta! The best part? It wasn’t “boring” or “static” like another Italian…Thomas Aquinas…

...

 


  • I’m just so proud of what I see and hear coming from this Vatican, I could burst.
    NOT. Not now, not ever.
    This pope and his lieutenants are doing evil things for evil reasons. Something wicked this way comes.
    Bet on it.

...

 


  • “…fake news scandal…”

    A scandal that is itself “fake news”? Or, a scandal caused by someone’s fabricating “fake news”?

    Viganò fabricated (via photoshopping) an apparent “endorsement” by Pope Benedict of a set of “little books” (as he called them) about Bergoglio’s “theology”–books which Benedict assured the world he would never find time to read.

 

 

 

Own comment: 

If a man is the sum of the company he keeps then Bergoglio is a liar, a thief, a sodomite, a child molestor, a Talmudist, a drug addict, a lover of sodomitical orgies , a coprophagian, a hater of truth and goodness knows what else. Furthermore, as far as his vices go, that is just for starters...That is only what we can discern from the people he choose to keep closest to him.

Perhaps he is not the sum of these men, but he simply likes the stench of evil they exude. Either way, we ought to be happy when Bergoglio makes it his business to appoint the most discredited people to made-up positions that he himself makes up just to have them around him.

As I have written many times before: This makes the job of condemning him and with him the diabolical Vatican II Council which he uses as his anchor point all the easier.