Italian Philosopher: What if Francis Were the Last Pope of the Roman Catholic Tradition, & a Different Christianity Were Being Born?

Date: 
Saturday, October 17, 2020 - 22:30
Article link: 

 

  •  Avatar

    I am no theologian, just an observant pew-sitter. My good, young priest during his sermon on Oct. 4, Feast of St. Francis, clearly stated that St. Francis "has been high-jacked by the tree huggers." I believe he spoke the truth.

  •  
  •  

     

    ... 

      Avatar

      A Christianity without belief in Heaven and Hell, or the Divinity of Christ, is by definition not Christianity at all. IT's just empty sentimentalist with some vague Theistic elements.

      Also, a Pope cannot change the nature of the Church, and if he tries he would be guilty of heresy.

  •  
  •  
      Avatar

      Francis seems already to have tested the waters of Lake Heresy with the nonsense he spouts concerning the moral liceity of the death penalty, Johann. I think he finds those waters very attractive.

     
    Avatar

    He is doing his damnedest to definitively metamorphosise the Church into a soft atheistic cult and no one dare defy him as he and his element have have hijacked the papacy to vaporize it from within, only to leave a façade from which to promote their own vacuous notions.

  • The state of affairs in the Church indicates a deliberate, diabolical and comprehensive plan. This plan’s mission statement was indicated by Bergoglio’s 2016 announcement; “It is not to be excluded that I will enter history as the one who split the Catholic Church.”

    Various naïve attempts have been made to explain away the Bergoglio phenomenon ─ well intentioned mistakes, gaffes or simple incompetence. Churchill warned; “Never underestimate your enemy for he is cunning.”

    Christopher Ferrara wrote in Socci on Bergoglio as Jesus II (Remnant Sept 26, 2017). “What Bergoglio is attempting is precisely the destructive process foretold by the atheist philosopher Feuerbach, who predicted that the Church would (per impossible) be destroyed through “an irreversible transformation of Christianity into atheistic humanism, with the aid of Christians themselves, guided by a concept of charity that will have nothing to do with the Gospel.”

    Ferrara asks “Is it possible that we have underestimated the extent of the Bergoglian Debacle?”

    The typical military intelligence estimate should answer a number of enemy questions: Who is he? What is he? Where is he? What is he likely to do? In this estimate “What is he” is not apparent. Consider the estimate of Fr E Berry in his analysis of the Book of the Apocalypse.

    “There will be a complete organization ─ a church of Satan set up in opposition to the Church of Christ. Satan will assume the part of God the Father; Antichrist will be honoured as Saviour, and his prophet will usurp the role of Pope.”

    “The beast arising from the earth is a false prophet – the prophet of Antichrist. Our divine Saviour has a representative on earth in the person of the Pope upon whom He has conferred full powers to teach and govern. Likewise, Antichrist will have his representative in the false prophet who will be endowed with the plenitude of satanic powers to deceive the nations.”

    “The earth whence comes the second beast is a symbol of the Gentile nations in revolt against the Church. The two horns denote a twofold authority – spiritual and temporal. As indicated by the resemblance to a lamb, the prophet will probably set himself up in Rome as a sort of antipope during the vacancy of the papal throne mentioned above. But the elect will not allow themselves to be deceived; they will recall the words of Our Lord: ‘Then if any man shall say to you: Lo here is Christ, or there, do not believe him.’”
    (The Apocalypse of St John, pp 135-138, Rev E Sylvester Berry, 1921.)

    Prophetically it seems, Ven Fulton Sheen described this counterfeit church; “The False Prophet will have a religion without a cross. A religion without a world to come. A religion to destroy religions. There will be a counterfeit church. Christ’s Church [the Catholic Church] will be one. And the False Prophet will create the other. The false church will be worldly, ecumenical, and global. It will be a loose federation of churches. And religions forming some type of global association. A world parliament of churches. It will be emptied of all divine content and will be the mystical body of the Antichrist. The mystical body on earth today will have its Judas Iscariot and he will be the false prophet. Satan will recruit him from among our bishops.”

     

    Regretfully there in not a syllable of yours which is not possible or even likely. I'm taken aback by the quote from Feuerbach. There is nothing presently underway to which to appeal to render it an absurdity.
    The unveiling of the Pachamama coin from the Vatican on October 13th was simply chilling. It appears all of a design.

     


    We must surely have reached the point where the identification of Bergoglio with the Anti-church can no longer be doubted. Perhaps it is time for actual Catholics to formally recognise this, and to elect a true Pope. I know schism is a great sin, but we have not created it - that has been the work of the Modernists, who have brought into being this sham church.

     

    “Perhaps it is time for actual Catholics ..... to elect a true Pope.”

    Unfortunately, it is not within the power of Catholics, hierarchical or lay, to depose a pope, apparent or otherwise.

    You claim that “the identification of Bergoglio with the Anti-church can no longer be doubted” and I agree. Additionally, all the evidence indicates that Bergoglio is the False Prophet of the Apocalypse. If this is the case then he will continue until his mission is completed. Then .....

    And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet: who wrought signs before him, wherewith he seduced them, who received the mark of the beast, and who adored his image. These two were cast alive into the pool of fire burning with brimstone ….. where both the beast and the false prophet shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever.
    Apoc 19:20 & 20: 9,10.

     

     

    Own comment: 

    One of the reasons why I early on decided to refer to Bergoglio by his family name and not the name he chose as pope - an action which seems to have spread even to the highest levels, with Archbishop Vigano now doing the same (not that he copied me necessarily) - is because I did not want to associate the name "Francis" or the word "pope" with negativity. If I call him Bergoglio then I can speak the truth of him without ever leading to anyone disdaining either Francis or the papacy.

    The comment by James (the other one)  makes this obvious, and it is perhaps the case that had he also decided to refer to the big destroyer as Bergoglio and not Francis, he might have avoided this:

    All that garbage, and the exploiting of St Francis in the interests of false religion by JP2 as well, has totally put me off St Francis of Assisi 

    We cannot allow Bergoglio or his ilk, or those who claim our saints, to be the ones who determine how we view them. This is part of the devil's plan and must be resisted vigorously.

    Finally, the man at the centre of this piece is an atheist and I am left wondering: If an atheist can tell that Bergoglio is not Catholic, what excuse do Catholics have? Something is very amiss if atheists recognise Catholicism better than those who call themselves Catholics do.