The Impossible Photo

Submitted by LocutusOP on Sat, 09/15/2018 - 23:53
Author: 

AndyS,Tony Little,Dave, Anton P   ,   Pamela D’Arcy,  skyblaze, Andrew , MJ ,Jo Don  , Nicholas Brown,Moschops, skyblaze, They’ve got him on a B.O.T , Boris, Dave, Garth Carthy,      

 

 

Date: 
Saturday, September 15, 2018 - 23:45
Article link: 
The Impossible Photo

 

 

  • Reply ↓

    AndyS September 8, 2018 at 20:13

    This one does you no favours at all Craig, truly ‘Infowars’ standards of journalism.

    • Reply ↓

      Tony Little September 9, 2018 at 12:38

      The implication is either the photos are fake, OR two different people managed to walk at precisely the same pace to the exact same spot in two different corridors without being able to see each other and coordinate their movement. Do you think that this is plausible?

 ...

  • Reply ↓

    Anton P September 10, 2018 at 10:26

    https://goo.gl/dvUcYt

    https://postimg.cc/image/jk2wvfkd9/

    – Left column: with the two men, the red sign is on the right on both images.
    – Right column: red signs are on the right hand wall, which fits with the above.
    – Right column: no red signs on the left hand wall.

    This dismisses the flipped image theory.

    You go through these channels as you enter the main terminal after baggage collection. These channels are not that long as you can clearly see. Probably around 4 metres long. If you have two people walking alongside each other, as people do when they travel together, and they go through two identical parallel channels, they will be entering and exiting these at the same time. It takes less than 3 seconds to walk through them.

Reply ↓

Pamela D’Arcy September 9, 2018 at 03:55

The description beneath the top photo says petrov arriving at 3pm (15.00) when the cctv pic shows the time being 16.22.43. You’d think they’d at least make sure everything matched up when your intention is to tell a whopping great big lie. Whoever made this up really wants to think about paying attention to details, especially blatant obvious ones.

Reply ↓

Anton P September 9, 2018 at 09:40

3pm is the flight arrival

Reply ↓

skyblaze September 10, 2018 at 07:43

1 hour 22 minutes is a LONG time to get through even at Gatwick

Reply ↓

Anton P September 10, 2018 at 09:46

I was in Stansted last Tuesday. My wife, daughter and I were in a queue for 1 hour and 15 minutes. And you also need time to get from your plane to the passport control. But sometimes it can be quick. We were arriving at Stansted at the of July and it only took 15 minutes. And Gatwick is the same.

...

...

  • Reply ↓

    MJ September 9, 2018 at 11:23

    There is a distortion on the left of the top photograph (behind the 8, of 2018) of what could be construed as maybe a door handle or something like it, on the left. Yet it is absent from the other picture. That, and the fact that these two photos look like they are coming from slightly different angles suggest that if the security cameras are fixed, then there’s not much likelihood of the exact same camera having captured both of these photos, and therefore they may be different corridors altogether.

    I couldn’t tell you to be certain, I’ve never been there, but you can bet I’m still taking the official story with a pound of salt.

  • Reply ↓

    Jo Don September 9, 2018 at 11:39

    Don’t know if you’ve seen the latest version of this silly saga from the BBC News?
    They have posed yet more different version of the photos. Cropped and with the time stamp in a different position.
    Quite a lot of effort to stop us asking the rather more pertinent questions.
    Don’t you think?
    https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=2117355218592935&set=p.2117355218592935&type=3&theater

...

  • Reply ↓

    Nicholas Brown September 9, 2018 at 14:03

    I happen to think the photos are fake. But whatever your view on that, just take a step back and ask yourself – do you seriously believe that if the Russian government wanted them assassinated it would not have succeeded? If Russia wanted them dead, they would now be dead.

    • Reply ↓

      Moschops September 9, 2018 at 17:18

      So it’s possible for one government to produce amateurish fake photos – what a screw up of something quite simple – but impossible for another government to screw up an assassination?

      Pick one. Do governments screw things up or not?

      • Reply ↓

        skyblaze September 10, 2018 at 07:47

        no. this mess is deliberate smoke and mirrors with things that do not add up because 1 the vast majority of the voting public do not have the time nor inclination to car so will accept headlines and soundbites as the truth and 2 the people that do look into this stuff in more detail will be so preoccupied analysing this that that they are pulling off new stunts currently

...

  • Reply ↓

    They’ve got him on a B.O.T September 10, 2018 at 03:56

    Is Peter related to Stanislav Petrov,George Petrov, or Evgeny Petrov? By the time this false flag manure is over. Westminster will be claiming Peter Petrov is the son of the central foreign character of the ‘House of Cards’ . Who played as Russian President Viktor Petrov. Season 4 House of Cards themed (2017) was about the character President Viktor Petrov and poison. You can’t make this stuff up. Rotflmfao

...

  • Reply ↓

    Boris September 10, 2018 at 18:16

    3rd option, different gateways, fake timestamps because they arrived (days) earlier. The giveaway, MSM cropped the time stamps. A search on CCTV turns up 2 russian looking men in the location at the right time … but it requires they arrive just before the ‘hit’ aka they are not tourists, hence the fake date, the time was a screw-up. The fake names and grainy photos so noone can question the story for this time there are no details to question. The boys in the trench coats are learning.

...

  • Reply ↓

    Dave September 11, 2018 at 06:01

    I watched John McDonnell on Politics Live and it was very sad really, because you could see he was trying to appease the smearers by being reasonable, but they wouldn’t let it go, and he had to debase himself even more, hoping that would do the trick, but it didn’t and it wont. I.e. you can humiliate yourself by agreeing to every absurdity and its still not enough and you lose your dignity in the process. Sad, because he is normally an articulate advocate.

...

Reply ↓

Garth Carthy September 11, 2018 at 13:19

I still believe the photos were flipped. I can’t see any difference in the corridors and as I pointed out before the gates handles in the immediate foreground show one bending inward on the right hand side of one photo but on the left side on the other photo.
The camera position wasn’t necessarily changed in each shot: I think the finished print was cropped to give a skewed perspective.
I could be wrong but the more I look at these photos, the more suspicious I am becoming. There are various smudgy aspects relating to the subjects arms and hands which look to me like amateurish photoshop work.
Someone earlier pointed out that there is a notice on the right wall in both the original photos and therefore the photos haven’t been flipped.
It depends on the fact that there might well be a similar notice on both sides but one has been cropped out, deliberately or otherwise.

  • Reply ↓

    Dave September 11, 2018 at 16:04

    Yes its the same passageway, but with the bottom one cropped, so its nearer the gate, making it look different. I saw the same trick in another two photos of the two of them, with the top of the picture cropped so it made one of them look taller. The pictures have been edited onto the passageway, otherwise they wouldn’t be blurred, (airport cctvs will be good quality) and the blurring is to help (badly) disguise its the same person.

    If you put the left side of the man at the top against the right side of the man at the bottom, its a mirrored image. It seems a deliberate attempt to bring down the government by exposing the whole thing to even the blind and evidence of possible faction fighting with the secret services or simply contempt of the public running wild.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Own comment: 

The British police released images of people they claim to be suspects in the alleged Skripal poisoning. These pictures created more questions than they answered, not least due to the men having the same timestamp on the pictures which were released allegedly from the airport.

The comments show this debate raging, with some dismissing it and trying to explain that there are different gates, and others pointing out that there are distortions andotherodd things in the pictures.

The men have since come out and said that they always use the same gate at the airport so they have no idea how they could have ended up in pictures with the same timestamp without any sign of the other.