No one is forced to be a Christian. But no one should be forced to live according to the "new religion" as though it alone were definitive and obligatory for all mankind.
Telegram Channels
Today's Mass
Traditional Liturgical Calendar
Tags
abortion
anti-Catholicism
anti-Christianity
anti-Russian propaganda
apostasy
Bergoglio anti-Catholicism
Bergoglio effect
Bergoglio heresy
Bergoglio homosexualism
Bergoglio idiocy
Bergoglioism
Bergoglio pontificate failure
Bp. Athanasius Schneider
CallMeJorge
Cardinal Müller
Cardinal Robert Sarah
Cdl. Raymond Burke
China
Church in Germany
Church revival
Covid19 coronavirus totalitarianism
culture of death
diabolical disorientation
DNC
Donald Trump
E.U.
EponymousFlower
euthanasia
feminism
Fr. Allan J. McDonald
Fr. John Hunwicke
Fr. John Zuhlsdorf
Fr. Peter Carota
Fr. Ray Blake
France
Germany
GlobalResearch
Gloria.tv
Gregory DiPippo
Holy Communion for lechers
homosexualism
homosexuality
intra-Church persecution
ISIS
Islam
Islamisation
Laura Wood
leftism
LifeNews
LifeSiteNews
Louie Verrecchio
Maike Hickson
marriage
Matthew Archbold
Michael Matt
modernism
Mundabor
Novus Motus Liturgicus
Novus Ordo
Novus Ordo apostasy
Novus Ordo filth
Novusordoism
Novus Ordo Missae
NovusOrdoWatch
OnePeterFive
papal heresy
papal piracy
papal scandal
persecution
Peter Hitchens
Peter Kwasniewski
political correctness
Pope Benedict XVI
Roberto de Mattei
Ron Paul Institute
Rorate Caeli
Russia
SSPX
Steve Skojec
StrategicCulture.org
Sweden
Syrian war
Tantumblogo
The Remnant
totalitarianism
traditionalism
transgenderism
Tridentine Mass
U.K. decline
U.S. circus
U.S. decline
U.S. militarism
U.S. roguery
Ukraine
Vatican II
Vladimir Putin
VoxCantoris
Western civilisation downfall
Western decadence
Western intervention
Elisabeth F. ,
Sad that this is no joke. Here we have and adulterous wedding that the whole world thinks is wonderful . Except God.
Reply
Was the first marriage of HRH the Duchess of Sussex in the Church? I doubt it, since her first husband was Jewish. Also, she was not baptized until she was preparing to enter the Royal Family. I believe that the Pauline Privilege would apply in this case.
First marriage was on a beach and took 15 mins
Has the Archbishop of Canterbury the power to allow an Anglican to exercise the Pauline privilege. Surely such a matter requires the authority of the Holy See? I hope that I am wrong.
The first marriage is both valid (and ratified) given that neither party was a Catholic, but non-sacramental as neither were baptised.
The Archbishop of Canterbury would need to put himself and the entire English church under the authority of the Roman Pontiff and then apply to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith to examine the individual case and, if it is warranted, to submit the petition to the Supreme Pontiff requesting the favour.
As part of the examination of this individual case Meghan's first husband would need to be questioned as to whether he would wish to stay married to her!
Perhaps the Archbishop (and all the bishops) would be willing to be one with Rome once again over the matter of a marriage of a Royal Highness named Harry!
I think the Archbishop of Canterbury has the power to allow Anglicans to do whatever they want. At least retrospectively or under force majeure
...
Mrs. Trevor Engelson remains the wife of Trevor, as he is still very much alive. There is another word for the relationship between the prince and Mrs. Engelson. You can find out what is is in Matthew 5 and 19.
...
There was nothing about marriage because the preacher thinks that two people of the same sex can be married to one another.
...
William was smart enough to marry into a family. He's going to have be the example for his younger brother, since no one else in the Windsor family (except Uncle Edward and the Queen) understands fidelity.
It is hard to think for one moment that Harry and Meghan had actually ever previously been part of any religious or cultural occasions from which they were familiar with the choir, ministers, soloists. How often have they worshipped in the Coptic Church ? All sound and fury signifying nothing.
How very sad for the bride's mother, for whom I see nothing for her to be proud of, nor has she "acquired" inlaws who will have anything to do with her in the future.
...
Everybody has nice things to say about the bride's mother, and lovely woman she may be. But if Meghan Markle was not baptized, the woman failed her primary responsibility to her own child and jeopardized the child's soul.