Has Bergoglio been told by Cardinals that he is at risk of losing the Petrine Office for heresy?

Date: 
Tuesday, April 3, 2018 - 23:30
Article link: 

 

Ana Milan said...

We all know that PF has been using Scalfari, with his consent, to test the waters for his secular innovations which have but one aim - the total destruction of the CC. Scalfari, being an obdurate Atheist, would be an ideal source to propagate such ideologies. If, at last, the silent Cardinals are beginning to stir themselves & wag their fingers at PF then it is undoubtedly an answer to our prayers. Our Lady did say the pope would consecrate Russia to Her Immaculate Heart but that it would be late. Maybe, just maybe, the straw that broke the camel's back is being used to get PF to retract his daily heresies, blasphemies etc. & do what he & other popes before should have done & carry out this act of consecration. Maybe the prelates at long last have decided enough is enough & their faith in PF's 'pastoral' abilities is leading to the desecration of what was once the OHC&A Church. With the public announcement of the betrayal of Chinese Catholics to a filthy Communist regime to the consternation of the world's Catholics, & Lettergate on top of all that has gone before (criminal & obscene behaviour of clerics), even the most hardened Mason amongst them are beginning to see that their own positions within the Vatican & its Episcopates are severely at risk if it all goes down the drain.

Let's continue to pray & vocalise our dissent of this tyrannical Destroyer Pope to pressure these old & embittered men who are about to meet their Creator to give up their pertinacity & return to preaching the Word of God.

...

Dorota Mosiewicz-Patalas said...

I believe that bringing back the topic, with the same person, five years later, and at this time, was very deliberately done, calculated for shock (on those who can still be shocked) value, desensitization, and irreversible change in the end.

All who take an issue with the alleged non-existence of hell, are meant to look like evil hypocrites, who wish eternal damnation on other people.

Here we have our humble and just saviour, willing to corrects God for the sake of equity (social justice, after all, is equity for here and now only), and we still complain! How inhumane, how barbaric, how legalistic, how rigid!

The key concept here is equity - equal outcomes for all. It is very popular with progressive governments. Like Bergoglio, they attack meritocracy, competence, hard work. Accomplishments and inequalities are always unjust, they must be evenly distributed. So must Bergoglian salvation.

 

M. Prodigal said...

Not the first time this pope has said something like this. He likes to tell others and let them do the proclaiming of course. And at the very least is derelict of duty to not end confusion and clearly state the truths of the faith. Rather, he assures and promotes others in their dereliction too.

Anonymous said...

The impression I got when reading Socci's article is that the cardinal would have had to be one who sides with Bergoglio and probably helped him be elected. Why? It sounds like they are warning him - not because they necessarily want him to correct his errors - but that they don't want anything throwing them off their masonic course, as in unseating this imposter.

...

11rhymesandreasons said...

I don't really see this as being about PF anymore. It's about the bishops, our shepherds. It's about what happened when 3 years of schema were thrown out a week into V2, about the Novus Ordo rollout, about all the official ambiguity and thinly veiled heresy promulgated from 1962 up to Amoris Laetitia. You read about the universal dereliction of episcopal duty that happened during the English reformation and wonder, did the historians make this up? How is it possible that only one bishop stood his ground? Don't they take an oath to defend us unto death? We could understand a few hirelings, and with a big stretch maybe even a sizeable minority. But this boggles the mind.

...

Kathleen1031 said...

Friends, just like the formal correction that never arrived, and never will arrive most likely, this stuff can keep us all going for years.
We've got an apostate on the Chair of Peter, and he's there as long as he's there.
We are going to have to exercise our best efforts with the virtue of patience, because while the vile papacy could end tonight, we see what the conclave would consist of, and we have to be realistic.
Hang on to personal holiness and the faith. They can't take that away from us, no matter how bad it gets.

...

 
Anonymous said...

@ Paul Morphy

Only one cardinal has reacted? The entire college of cardinals should be demanding the pope issue a statement saying that Hell exists, and that all souls are immortal.

 

Own comment: 

It is not entirely out of the question that the story was an April fool's joke, but assuming that it is true I hope that other cardinals will follow and try and force Bergoglio to lay off his anti-Catholicism.