Francis tells U.S. Novus Ordo Bishops he supports public Benefits for Sodomite Couples

Date: 
Wednesday, February 5, 2020 - 23:00
Article link: 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  •  
     
    Avatar

    Par for the course for Jorge. He is consistently pro homosexual. He is as queer as a three dollar bill. 

    Avatar

    I'm really beginning to suspect that since the high water mark of Freemasonry in 1959 -- the year after "John XXIII" was "elected" -- that homosexuals (and worse) have replaced Freemasons as the prime secret society driving the human race to hell.

Could be homosexual Freemasons 

...

        • Avatar

  • What advantage does the state derive from their unnatural acts and their cohabitation?
    ....................................................................................

    A DISadvantage to the American taxpayer would be astronomical increases in health and mental care costs:

    https://www.catholiceducati...

      Avatar

      Thank you for pointing out this study. Most informative and eye-opening. If the study's concluding paragraph is correct, that "those who engage in same-sex practices or identify themselves as gay, lesbian or bisexual constitute a very small percentage of the population. The most reliable studies indicate that 1-3 percent of people and probably less than 2 percent consider themselves to be gay, lesbian or bisexual, or currently practice same-sex sex," then they enjoy an influence which is all out of proportion with their numbers! For such a statistically small percentage of society, the gay lobby is the tail wagging the dog, as it were.

      Avatar

      What bothers me more than the actual sodomites themselves doing what they do is those who are heterosexual that tolerate, support, or encourage it.

    The disadvantage to any taxpayer ...

    So let me state, that as a Traditional Catholic and sedevacantist I have nothing against sodomite "marriage", per se. Because as Romans 1:32 has it, perverts are worthy of death (meaning official execution, as a law of the land, not some vigilante action), so then why would it bother me if they get "married" two minutes before they are burned at the stake?

    Here in Lisbon, Portugal, in Jan 2010, there was a demonstration against the queer marriage. It was exactly at that point that I became a legal immigrant (as I was illegal before), so I went to the demonstration (without the legalized status this would have been be problematic). In the beginning it looked normal, because the people I talked to initially were also opponents of sodomy. So we started the march, during which I conversed with a bunch of others, stating that they have no problem with "gays". I had to ask why are they here. For some economical reasons, tax benefits, etc., they responded. Had I known this before, I would have not participated.

    ...

    As Mr. Jorge continues to pile turd upon turd on his heap of malodorous "papal" pronouncements, what is left to us who pray for restoration, to do.
    I get no comfort from the fact that he is not Pope. It causes anguish and sadness to us who eagerly await his public burning as heretic and apostate - whether figuratively or actually -
    this would console and comfort us.

    Maybe we should pray a novena for a visible Divine chastisement. May the earth open beneath him, for all of us to see. There was a novena like this decades ago on SedeList, which I am no longer able to find.

     

    I believe we are living in a visible Divine chastisement.

    But would it not be better for us all to pray a novena, or more importantly, pray a daily Rosary as well as individual daily prayers, penances and mortifications for the conversion of all of these arbiter's of evil? Are we not to love our enemies?

     

    Loving our enemies? You are right, but Frankie is not only our enemy. Remember, even the Book of Psalms contains some prayers for justice (and Our Holy Mother the Church makes us say the whole Psalter, as part of the Divine Office so don/t tell me that this is only the Old Testament). God does not only have His merciful side, but also His just side. There must be a balance. The visible chastisement I mentioned was meant for the enemies of our holy Mother the Church.

    ...

    It would just relieve some of the burden from the NO clergy. They’ve been embezzling money from parishes and dioceses for years and giving some of it to their boyfriends. If Jorge has his way the taxpayers will now cover it. That’s more money with which the clergy can line their own pockets.

    ...


    There is a reason why husband and wife are entitled to certain social and tax benefits from the state, and that’s because marriage is a great blessing to society because by its nature it results in offspring and thus maintains and increases the number of citizens.

    I sure hope there's more to it than that given many of us can not have children due to age/infertility. 

     
     
     
    •  
       
      Avatar

      In case it wasn't clear, I meant procreation as the goal of marriage in principle. It is the reason why marriage exists to begin with -- it is the natural and intended goal of the union of husband and wife. That in some people this goal cannot be realized for natural reasons beyond their control is understood, but it does not follow from this that marriage as such does not benefit the common good. 

        Avatar

        I understand. It just seems that those of us who can not procreate are often forgotten in discussions such as these. And I fully admit that it's a very sensitive topic for me especially at this time.

     

     

     

    Own comment: 

    Naturally, an entry such as this will elicit a large number of responses.

    There is good reason - based on a multitude of his own statements and a multitude of alleged scandals - to suspect that Bergoglio himself is a sodomite. Therefore we ought not be surprised when he actively promotes sodomy in his role as whatever-the-heck-he-is.