Francis Claims: Church "Seriously Violated" the "Right to Life" Until He "Changed" Catechism

Date: 
Sunday, March 3, 2019 - 23:45
Article link: 

 

eticacasanova

1) Of course, he is a communist atheist, he has to affront God's order. Because, besides, he is a kabbalist jew, a gnostic at war with reality and its order. Being a jew, he is, besides, at war with Logos, Christ and reason, but in a desperate struggle against the Church. PERIOD

eticacasanova

2) Penalties are a feature of commutative or retributive JUSTICE, not a means of defense. The death penalty is no exception, it is a means of justice for very extreme violations of the order and the damage they cause.

...

Rafał_Ovile

Consequence of heresy is cognitive error which leads to distorted thoughts of reality. Heresies were present and will be. However (post)-modern exceptional phenomena is that remaining Catholic Hierarchs/ Princes do not want to resist and condemn. (i.e. Heresies Index). Admonish the sinner through spiritual work of mercy with gentlness, kindness and consequence.

...

CatMuse

No! Francis teaches error. He has not modified the catechism since he does not have the authority to overthrow Catholic moral principles.

...

sheepette

What does changing the Catechism do? He hasn't changed official teaching by doing that has he? Isn't it just like a reference book?

mattsixteen24

Teaches them garbage and leads them into error. He can't change doctrine. No one can.

Prayhard

His Jesuit doctrine chief Ladaria or another used clever words which avoid explicitly changing doctrine. Said it was unsuited to these times, or words to that effect.

 

"Garbage in Garbage out"

...

Eva

An error for two thousand years?

...

De Profundis

Pope Francis seems to have found the teaching of intrinsically evil acts. But: Death penalty is not among them. (Adultery is-)

...

Prayhard

This public heresy holds God, the prophets, Popes and Saints to be in error. Wickedness.

...

Don Reto Nay

I am strongly against using the death penalty. But to say that it is in every case a serious violation of the right to life is nonsense. I am with Pope Francis when he dissuades governments from applying the death penalty but by doing it in such a sloppy and intellectually lousy way, he may well achieve the opposite.

...

alex j

A question for Francis and all fellow Catholics who support his stand against capital punishment. Have you ever thought that without capital punishment we would have no Christianity??? Go and figure!

 

Own comment: 

Certainly the argument that without the death penalty there would not be Christianity is not one in favour of the morality of the death penalty. Christ died to free us from sin, so without sin there would not be Christianity either, but that does not mean that sin is licit.

I do, however, agree with alex j's statement :

Garbage in Garbage out

Whether the garbage is Bergoglio himself or the nonsense he was taught in seminary makes no material difference in reference to Bergoglio.

Finally, I do not think Bergoglio is a Jew, lest it be concluded that I included that statement because I agree with it.