Feminist: “Bible Much More Violent than Koran, I Know, I’m a Former Catholic”

Author: 

Baseballmom, c matt , Tim, Magdalene P         

Date: 
Monday, December 11, 2017 - 23:45
Article link: 

 

1. Baseballmom - November 30, 2017

I think you are spot on with those last paragraphs. I would add only that women instinctively desire to be treated “as a lady.” But their religion (feminism) does not allow them to accept that fact. Their religion is at war with their nature.

 
...
2. c matt - November 30, 2017

The Bible is full of violence because it covers human history . . . which is full of violence. I don’t get her beef.

 
Tim - November 30, 2017

She doesn’t either….she suffers from diarrhea of the mouth.

Liberalism….find a cure!

https://teespring.com/stores/markdice

...

 
5. Magdalene P - November 30, 2017

And now we have all these women who are allegedly victims of groping, etc. Some are, probably some are not but many are piling on the bandwagon. And it only takes an allegation to bring a man down; that used to be reserved to priests. So women are just victims all over the place…except when they are not. And men? Masculinity and fatherhood under attack as never before.

...

6. Tim - November 30, 2017

“I’ve read passages [of the Koran] and the Bible is a lot more violent. I should know, I’m a former Catholic.”

No Miss, you’re former Novus Ordo, not the same thing.

Sadly, even if she did “grow up”(her presence at such an event shows she hasn’t) Catholic, the likelihood of her having knowledge of Scripture is low as Catholics(yes, even some Traddies) have embarrassingly low Scriptural literacy rates.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Own comment: 

Millenials and thought don't seem to go hand-in-hand. As Tantumblogo writes:

“I’ve read passages [of the Koran] and the Bible is a lot more violent.  I should know, I’m a former Catholic.”  Another triumph for the post-conciliar Church!

A commenter, Tim, commented:

“I’ve read passages [of the Koran] and the Bible is a lot more violent. I should know, I’m a former Catholic.”

No Miss, you’re former Novus Ordo, not the same thing.

Sadly, even if she did “grow up”(her presence at such an event shows she hasn’t) Catholic, the likelihood of her having knowledge of Scripture is low as Catholics(yes, even some Traddies) have embarrassingly low Scriptural literacy rates.

 

It is indeed difficult to argue that the Novus Ordo religion in any substantial way equates to the Catholic religion. It's biggest fruit seems to be apostasy.

The more controversial statement in the piece is the following:

Which brings me to my final point – I will probably offend some in saying this, or how I say this, but I have long had a sense that many feminists are really little more than out of control teenage daughters who keep acting more and more outrageously in the increasingly forlorn hope that “dad” – society, males at large, whatever – will rein them in.  And the longer they are allowed to continue acting out, the more hurt and upset and, subsequently radicalized, they become.  It’s like they are a toddler constantly trying to find some boundary that daddy will set for them.  In their rage in finding none in the collectively weak Western men of the past 60 years, they will even turn to the cruel, draconian authoritarianism of islam to find some entity that seems to care about them enough to tell them no, to set firm limits, and make them turn over the dang car keys.

I find it quite accurate though, to be honest. These feminists by and large seem to be out-of-control rebels without a cause and the only thing they seem to know is that Christianity is bad and they will run off to whichever bad boy they can find to spite the old faith. Sadly for them, the joke is on them, as one cannot claim for even an instance that feminism is associated with joy or levity. It's pre-dominant drive seems to be finding somethigg else to complain about.

I am also at a loss to understand what these women are marching for, given that the laws in most formerly Christian countries can hardly favour women more. The only way they would favour women more than men would be if they did something akin to the U.S. in slavery or segregation times - what it did to blacks - and deemed men as something akin to an inferior class of human beings officially.

The favouritism in the law nowadays actually is based on the exact opposite premise: That men are superior to women who thereby have to be protected by all manner of laws to level the playing field.