Catholic Author Does Away with the Fairy Tale of A "Misinterpreted Vatican II"

Date: 
Monday, October 12, 2020 - 23:45
Article link: 

 

MyronM

3 sep.

 

Our Lady of All Nations [Amsterdam' apparitions] to Ida Peerdaman on May 31, 1965 – the final year of Vatican II. Quote:

“Go to Pope Paul and tell him in the name of ‘the Lady of All Nations:’

“This is the last warning before the end of the Council.

The Church of Rome is in danger of a schism."

“Warn your priests. Let them put a stop to those false theories about the Eucharist, sacraments, doctrine, priesthood, marriage family-planning.

THEY ARE BEING LED ASTRAY BY THE SPIRIT OF UNTRUTH – by Satan — and confused by the ideas of modernism. Divine teaching and laws are valid for all time and newly applicable to every period." Quote end.

...

Chris Benischek

3 sep.

 

Feast of Pope Saint Pius X
3rd September, A. D. MMXX

Thank you Myron--you are spot on. Of course Our Lady of Fatima warned of Apostasy in the Church at the highest levels, in the message to have been revealed by 1960, but which was not on direct command of John the XXIII, the Un-Saint, who instead suppressed it.

She also, most likely, warned in this message of a false pope to come leading people into a Church of Hell, which describes Bergoglio to a "t". The indisputable part of the Secret, re "Apostasy in the Church at the highest levels," also captures Bergoglio, and his minions, to a "t".

Happy Feast of today's great pope, saint and man, Beppo Sarto, from an era when Popes were fearlessly Catholic.

 

MyronM

3 sep.

 

The 3rd Secret of Fatima was first published on the Internet in 2O10, so there's no need to guess at its content. Here is its full text [quote *]:

"Tuy, April 1, 1944

JMJ

Now I am going to reveal the third fragment of the secret: This part is the apostasy in the Church!

Our Lady showed us the individual who I describe as the 'holy Father' in front of a multitude that was cheering him.

But there was a difference from a true holy Father, his devilish gaze, this one had the gaze of evil.

Then, after some moments we saw the same Pope entering a Church, but this Church was the Church of hell; there is no way to describe the ugliness of that place. It looked like a gray cement fortress with broken angles and windows similar to eyes; it had a beak in the roof of the building.

Next, we raised our eyes to Our Lady who said to us: You saw the apostasy in the Church; this letter can be opened by the holy Father, but it must be announced after Pius XII and before 1960.

In the kingdom of John Paul II the cornerstone of Peter's grave must be removed and transferred to Fatima.

Because the dogma of the faith is not conserved in Rome, its authority will be removed and delivered to Fatima.

The cathedral of Rome must be destroyed and a new one built in Fatima.

If 69 weeks after this order is announced, Rome continues its abomination, the city will be destroyed.

Our Lady told us that this is written, [in] Daniel 9: 24-25 and Matthew 21: 42-44" Quote end.
* Surce: www.traditioninaction.org/Questions/B352_Secret.html
Sister Lucy wrote this secret down on the Saturday before Palm Sunday AD 1944. Pope Benedict XVI celebrated the 69th Holy Week in 2012. During the 70th Holy Week we could already see Jorge the Apostate, the destroyer of the Roman Catholic Church, in action.

Sept. 3rd, also the feast of Saint Gregory the Great, Pope and Doctor of the Church

...
Baptist John

3 sep.

 

The New Evangelization!
Francis preached to worshippers in one of Muhammad's Mosques in Africa, "Christians and Muslims are brothers and sisters". (Doukoudou Mosque2015)
Knowingly or not, Muhammad's followers worship Satan. They deny Jesus' Blood Sacrifice, of Himself for the forgiveness of man's sins.
.
Jesus teaches mankind,
"And stretching forth His hand towards His disciples, he said: Behold my mother and my brethren.
For whosoever shall do the will of my Father, that is in heaven, he is my brother, and sister, and mother." (Matthew 12:49-50)
Own comment: 

It is indeed impossible for any honest person who studies the facts to maintain the facade of a misinterpreted Vatican II. Whatever may have been in Vatican II must be considered to have been interpreted correctly by the very peole who wrote it, and they are the very ones who put it in action.

Anyone claiming otherwise is obviously dishonest.