Breaking News: John Salza leaves SSPX and returns to Novus Ordo church after "studying Sedevacantism." Who will publish Next 3 Vol. set???

Author: 

Gisèle A Demers , Unknown ,  Marle ,  patrickjamespaul ,          Dolorosa

Date: 
Thursday, October 22, 2020 - 20:45
Article link: 

 

Good and bad news... He is no longer a traditionalist, so will no longer be an obstacle to us...but sad news for the salvation of his soul none the less.... He is not a Catholic but a member of the masonic sect.

...

The Sacrifice of the Mass is the ultimate love for GOD not the Papacy------Jesus left everything entact for more than fifteen hundred years----has GOD Changed - not according to Revelations ( I Am The Alpha and Omega) I hope John can see that this Papacy is what has been foretold. God Bless Mr. John Salza hope he returns back to SSPX where Gods precious Son lives. SSPX is not sedevacants.

...

I tried to go to his blog but it is "by invitation only"...

Education himself on sedevacantism drove him into the arms of what will soon become the One World Religion?

Perhaps there will be more employment opportunities on that side of the fence.

You can take a man out of masonry but you can't take the mason out of the man.

...

... we were not quite sure that he had left the Masonary Brotherhood completely too.

...

I hear that someone saw him at the TLM this past Sunday. Robert Siscoe worked with John Salza on the book. Is he your source? Since you made the allegation public, I think we are entitled to ask questions. 

...

What I take from Mr. Salsa’s decision, is that he thinks, that the SSPX R&R position is untenable, for a Catholic, as it rubbishes Catholic doctrine on the papacy, and that one simply, has to decide, whether or not Vatican II alters the substance of The Faith or not. But I also think he probably saw that life is tough for sedevacantists. We need The Church, and sheep find it hard, without a shepherd. Most people go with the flow, and choose a bigger group with substantial benefits over a much smaller one, which doesn’t even have buildings in most countries. Sedevacantists were doing internet masses, even before COVID. Sedevacantism is a brave and tough choice, because it’s either stupid and foolish or it’s the truth. It can’t be fudged or synthesised, which is actually, one of the reasons, I think it’s true, because it’s the kind of choice God gives us (Mathew 5:37), an absolute either/or, that forces us to say, yes or no, unlike the other positions, which basically, encourage lots of talking, that never goes anywhere, makes everything unclear, and creates the absurd spectacle of people, from bloggers to bishops, telling the person, they acknowledge as the ‘final theological authority’, that he is wrong or defending the indefensible, the idea, that a man, who could not more clearly, condemn, what Saint Pope Pius X and every Pope in history, before Vatican II believed, when he is supposed to be defending it.

...

The Latin Tridentine Mass is the true mass before Vatican II. The Novus Ordo is an abomination and you never know what they'll do next when you attend one. I had one deacon get up to the altar and say there was no problem with having women priests and a lot of people started clapping for him. I left soon after when I found out the LTM was an hour away from me. I also trust Fr. Kramer over John Salza. I think Bergoglio is an antipope. The enemies of Christ were upset when Pope BVXI allowed the LTM. They hate that mass.

Own comment: 

I sincerely hope that reports of John Salza leaving traditionalism to embrace Novusordoism are false. I listened to a talk he once gave on freemasonry at the Fatima Center and it was quite enlightening.

It would indeed be extremely odd if studying sedevacantism had made him leave the SSPX - he is, of course, not a priest so is not technically a member of the SSPX - , which does not adhere to sedevacantism, and join NOChurch. That seems to be a conclusion which cannot be justified on account of opposition to sedevacantism, so if he no longer attends an SSPX parish   - if he did before - and this is disputed by one of the commenters, then it is more than likely to be a result of falling out with some other parishioners than an anti-sedevacantist action. Sadly, falling-outs among parishioners is not an uncommon thing.