One can readily admit that the Magisterium's manner of expression does not seem very easy to understand at times. It needs to be translated by preachers and catechists into a language which relates to people and to their respective cultural environments. The essential content of the Church's teaching, however, must be upheld in this process. It must not be watered down on allegedly pastoral grounds, because it communicates the revealed truth.
Telegram Channels
Today's Mass
Traditional Liturgical Calendar
Tags
abortion
anti-Catholicism
anti-Christianity
anti-Russian propaganda
apostasy
Bergoglio anti-Catholicism
Bergoglio effect
Bergoglio heresy
Bergoglio homosexualism
Bergoglio idiocy
Bergoglioism
Bergoglio pontificate failure
Bp. Athanasius Schneider
CallMeJorge
Cardinal Müller
Cardinal Robert Sarah
Cdl. Raymond Burke
China
Church in Germany
Church revival
Covid19 coronavirus totalitarianism
culture of death
diabolical disorientation
DNC
Donald Trump
E.U.
EponymousFlower
euthanasia
feminism
Fr. Allan J. McDonald
Fr. John Hunwicke
Fr. John Zuhlsdorf
Fr. Peter Carota
Fr. Ray Blake
France
Germany
GlobalResearch
Gloria.tv
Gregory DiPippo
Holy Communion for lechers
homosexualism
homosexuality
intra-Church persecution
ISIS
Islam
Islamisation
Laura Wood
leftism
LifeNews
LifeSiteNews
Louie Verrecchio
Maike Hickson
marriage
Matthew Archbold
Michael Matt
modernism
Mundabor
Novus Motus Liturgicus
Novus Ordo
Novus Ordo apostasy
Novus Ordo filth
Novusordoism
Novus Ordo Missae
NovusOrdoWatch
OnePeterFive
papal heresy
papal piracy
papal scandal
persecution
Peter Hitchens
Peter Kwasniewski
political correctness
Pope Benedict XVI
Roberto de Mattei
Ron Paul Institute
Rorate Caeli
Russia
SSPX
Steve Skojec
StrategicCulture.org
Sweden
Syrian war
Tantumblogo
The Remnant
totalitarianism
traditionalism
transgenderism
Tridentine Mass
U.K. decline
U.S. circus
U.S. decline
U.S. militarism
U.S. roguery
Ukraine
Vatican II
Vladimir Putin
VoxCantoris
Western civilisation downfall
Western decadence
Western intervention
SA,Hatuey,michael norton , Goose, Michael
SA September 22, 2019 at 07:17
Hatuey
This article is nine years old. Little has been done since about Israel’s illegal activities against the human rights of the Palestinians since. It is a case that the so called upholders of law internationally feel that this is not a universal law but that some countries can be exempt from them because they are an ethnically based democracy, itself a glaring contradiction.
Hatuey September 22, 2019 at 11:17
I know, SA. Nothing is ever done. And my lengthy comment which I apologise for, given that most people who come here know about this stuff, is another waste of time and effort that will result in nothing. I’m under no illusions.
When I see people on here defending Israel, though, and excusing their genocidal attacks on innocent people on the basis of population growth, we have no option but to go through the routine of reminding them that we know the truth.
Everybody with a conscience should be boycotting Israeli produce wherever they can and drawing attention to their crimes against humanity. Stealing the organs of kids that you murder is as sinister as you get in this world.
...
michael norton September 22, 2019 at 15:08
It is not that likely that Iran is directly involved.
Iran does not want all out war, especially if they have not done this thing.
However, Iran has offered all out war, including on the allies of America,
one of the states that is an allie of America, is of course Israel.
At the moment Israel does not have a functioning government.
So no real war until the new administration in Israel is installed and up and running, then only if they give all out war the thumbs up, which they will not.
...
Btw, Vietnam and Iraq don’t compare. I don’t expect the US would be in any hurry to send in troops on the ground in Iran. A win in the terms I’m using would mean hammering Iran back to the year dot.
Goose September 22, 2019 at 16:36
The most depressing thing living in the west, is our so-called free press and their willingness to believe without question everything coming out of Washington and Riyadh.
Maybe Jamal Khashoggi launched the missiles from the Turkish Saudi embassy car park?
...
Hatuey September 22, 2019 at 16:50
SA, I listened to the interview carefully. You can be sure that the drones were of Iranian origin, nobody is disputing that.
The US and U.K. want to violate the normal rules of proxy war and argue that by supplying the Houthis with these drone, Iran is basically responsible.
If we were to take them seriously, the US and U.K. as the world’s top two arms exporters would be straightforwardly responsible for more violence and destruction than the rest of the world put together.
But that would be a break from the normal rules of the proxy war game that the U.K. and US invented. Nobody in England or America who wanted to be taken seriously in the field of international relations would support that because proxy war is so central to everything when it comes to arms sales and foreign intervention.
Goose September 22, 2019 at 18:14
By that standard a certain Mr Kalashnikov would be responsible for every war on the planet.
What is it Trump and the NRA are fond of telling us every time there’s a mass shooting : weapons don’t kill anyone, people do.
Michael September 22, 2019 at 18:20
Russia and China could change the nature of warfare forever. If drawn into a war by western gangsters they could use their modern missile systems to personally target western leaders. They must know several addresses these savages live and frequent. Take war to their own front door and ensure some of them are amongst the first to die in this one. Very soon they’d realise this is personal, where they’re at extreme risk of being wiped out in a missile strike. After which the survivors will no longer be so keen to start war.
The article is primarily about how ridiculous is the notion that people should react stronlgy to oil installations in Saudi Arabia being bombed while ignoring massive bombings of civilian population sin Yemen over the past 4-5 years. Naturally, this tends to devolve into a pro- or anti-U.S. and pro- or anti-Israel debate which takes people off the main point.
The smart thing would be to stay out of it altogether, but since the West is led by idiots, they have taken the side of the worst culprits in the region - Wahhabists and Talmudists - and therefore we should not be surprised when they show little regard for common decency.